And now, the six o’clock nudes. NEWS! Six o’clock NEWS!
Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: LolaBonne
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous nobody expects | John McCain Next »
And now
» 142 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Nightshift100 on Progress Poker El Jefe on Has This Certain Ring to … Vikavid on Better Than Coffee Duncan on GREECE !neoritter on Progress Poker Geary on GREECE Geary on GREECE itsybit on GREECE formeraide on GREECE itsybit on GREECE 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Animal Memes: Bad Advice Cat - I Claw When I'm Happy
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
Secret?
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Too Cute Too Resist
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Both Are Effective, But Only One Lets Me Sing
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
FLying Pig vs Marathoner
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
GOTTA MAKE UP FOR LOST TIME, SON
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Tiny Sniffs
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
OK
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Honestly Man, That Ain't Right
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Violation of Probation
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Wrong Luna
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Tom Hiddleston Totally Looks Like Gene Wilder
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Diamond Skull Cufflinks
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Unsettling Skirt of the Day
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
Ye Olde Fixer Upper
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
As a liberal, I’m all for animal rights. Animals have a right to be tasty and keep me warm.
Meat is MURDER!!
Tasty, tasty murder.
Is eggs kidnapping murder?
D:
No, it’s only abortion. Your conscience is clear.
unless the egg is fertilized it’s neither you r-tards.
Oh David, yet another spiteful comment…. Are you n Gomer like brothers or something? Me thinks David here also needs to get laid really really really super badly…. [David's woeful reply was redacted]
+12 points for speculation skills! But what does it mean to “need to get laid really really really super badly”? Does this involve Deckboy imagining that david has a raging hard-on that has been lasting too long? Or is it something else? Whatever it is, GET A ROOM!
cheerio
Ooh, can I have some Cheerios?
But if David gets laid BADLY, he still will be an unhappy person. One would think. Of course, to most males, even BAD sex is good. So, maybe I’m wrong! Carry on!
I am pretty sure he meant eggs as in the kind a chicken lays.
Chicken eggs can also be fertilized, thats how you get baby chickens…
David’s point, I expect is that the eggs we buy in stores are unfertilized.
True, eggs bought in stores are not fertilized.
But o’course, we must not forget that for all the chickens being born for the purpose of egg laying- all the males are thrown into a dumpster to die. Which is just delayed abortion.. kind of.
Anyyyhoo.
Don’t they get eaten?
Yeah I think we eat the males. Except for a few that are left to fertilize some of the eggs. As long as males, females, and eggs are kept in controlled, separate environments most of the time, the whole thing works quite well for us all.
your eating a period?
EPIC EWWWWWWWWW
BITTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You’re back! I’ve missed my bitter love.
Uh, charro? That’s from August.
Oh.. I’m not having a good day today.
*hugs* Iz okay.
No. The vast majority of the male chicks get ground up when they’re still chicks. Sometimes ALIVE.
lmao. Agreed.
LMAO!!!
Not exactly my own sentiment, but I laughed!
lol nice comment, and those girls arent that hard on the eyes xP
I dunno, Miss “Than” has some pretty odd wrinkles on her stomach…
She’s underfed! Too much skin, not enough meat. Damn hippies.
She needs to eat some steaks and fried chicken.
mmm nothing says sexy like heart disease
Uhh…. no. You can’t do that.
“She needs to eat some steaks and fried chicken.”
And, lo, there is something Evil Pundit and I agree upon.
Only…
Ketchup, steak sauce, or pan gravy for the steaks?
If it’s done right, nothing is needed.
mmm… nude steaks…. =D~~
but miss “fur” has some meat on her in the right places ^^
yeah, it looked like she had cancer
Mrs. McWrinkles needs to gain some weight instead.
I personally thought she was turning into a shark..
At least they remembered to “cross ‘em at the knees”…
You act as if thats a good thing.
Yeah, those skin ripples were not attractive.
I just hope those aren’t ribs…
Hm, sorry to ruin the party but I’m pretty sure those are ribs.
If you look at her arm and leg she doesn’t have the meat for those be bulges. Or the boobs for them either.
Those don’t look like ribs at all. FYI: vegan does not mean anorexic. There are such things as not-thin vegetarians and vegans.
Is it a botched lipo job? Or maybe she just recently lost a lot of weight.
might just be the way she’s sitting.
I’m all for that statement, but the way they do it is kinda creepy.
Correction: “but the way they make it is kinda creepy.”
I agree. I don’t wear fur, but I’m not about to parade around naked to make the statement. Granted, I also eat meat, which might have something to do with it.
All we need now is a counter-protest across the street, with a bunch of people uncomfortable with their body image draped in (at the very least, faux) foxskins and leathers, all carrying signs that say, “I’d rather wear fur than go naked.”
win
Run! It’s the PETA Police!
Honestly, no one is forcing them to wear fur, right? So…they can wear cotton and not go naked and not show off botched lipo job.
Yes please! put on some clothes! There’s a time and a place.
oh shut up. there are worst demonstrations to be worried about.
there can only be a time and a place to stand up for something? give me a break. voice your opinion, unless it offends or makes someone feel guilty!
Yes, there are infinitely worse demonstrations. Zombietime’s photos of the “Breasts Not Bombs” march … *shudder*
*gags* Thanks. Thanks a lot. *runs away crying from the image now burned into mind*
Nudity in public is very unattractive to me, I’m voicing my opinion on that.
you might want to avoid the internet–or the public–or the world post 1950s.
i am no supporter for public nudity but seriously being ashamed of your body is pathetic. they are about as naked as a bathing suit. when you pop out of the womb in a knitted 3 piece suit, let me know.
um, you can use the internet without seeing nudity you know, or maybe you don’t… also, it is illegal to be nude in public, thank goodness. im not ashamed of my body and i don’t see any reason to parade it around in front of strangers for any reason, thats because i have self esteem, not because i am ashamed. the 1950′s had it right in my opinion.
I don’t know what repressive country you live in, but public nudity isn’t not a crime. Not in Oregon, at least. That said, I wouldn’t advise trying it at the next PTA meeting…
public indecency (such as being nude on public property, or where people can easily see you from public property) is illegal. That’s why you don’t generally see a bunch of people going around in their birthday suits during the hottest days of the summer.
In Ontario, it’s perfectly legal for a woman to go around topless. Something about equal rights – men are allowed to go topless in hot weather and all.
That being said, I don’t think it’s a good idea. Hell, I dno’t think it’s a good idea when men do it. Most men, anyway, from what I’ve seen.
It seems that anyone who really does have anything to show off (male or female) tends to keep it politely under wraps.
yay im really really late but if it is to protest somthing public nudity is allowed
So, you’re saying that if your opinion offends someone, you shouldn’t voice it? If that were the case, there would be no protests ever, and America would still be under British rule. One person’s opinion will ALWAYS offend at least one other person.
And I’m offended by people sitting around naked o_0
AND I don’t think ema was saying that there’s a time and place for a protest, I think she was s aying there’s a better time and place to be naked…
but that’s my rant for the morning, please continue with your regular programming.
I agree. Some people just don’t now how to read.
I agree. Some people just can’t read.
Or are capable of writing. do you shower with your eyes closed?
people dont shower in public either, hopefully
Reading comprehension fail.
“I don’t think ema was saying that there’s a time and place for a protest, I think she was s aying there’s a better time and place to be naked…” – Psilence
“I agree.” – me
You’re the one who checked your brain at the door (as in, left it, in case you can’t comprehend the phrase).
“seriously you are voicing your opinion on stating that someone shouldnt be offended by someone being offended?”
how does this make any sense, oh logic master?
Now, it’s the 1800′s, what happened to the 1950′s? Seriously, I see nothing so great about any of the new progressive morality of the 1960′s and beyond. It’s brought us nothing but venerial diseases and teenage pregnancy. But that is not the point. I don’t care if these people protest all they want buck naked with there rears in the air, I don’t have to like it and if I am disgusted by it I am going to say I am disgusted and I have a perfect right to say so.
Actually, there were “venereal diseases” (now called STDs and STIs) and teenage pregnancies before the 1960s. In fact, in the 1800s (and before.. and even into the 1900s..), teenage girls were sold off like chattel and impregnated under the guise of “marriage”; sometimes to men much older than they. Perhaps you should get an updated Human Sexuality book..?
But they called STDs nice names like ‘the pox’ back then.
you’re an idiot.
the slogan is “I’d rather go naked than wear fur”, not “I’d rather wear cotton than wear fur”. It’s a radical statement, not a kitten soft version. Hell, I wear cotton and not fur, but my every day life isn’t this protest.
hmm…I wear cotton and not fur because fur is freakin expensive, unless one my hunter friends would like to make me something out of deer fur or better yet, bear fur. warm and cozy. and leather is expensive too, which is why I only have one genuine leather bound book and no real leather coats or shoes or gloves or something.
shes a sharpei
duh
That was totally my first thought. *sporfle*
what is Sporfle ?
It’s a powdery substance that adheres to crotchwaffles.
Laughing so hard that anything you might have been drinking at the time comes out your nose/gets spat out
The looks on their faces suggest they might not be 100% comfortable with the decision they just made.
“Here come the police! Act clothed!”
As much as I am for animal rights, no one would ever get me to sit outside naked >.< I bet they are having really awkward conversations there.
… or maybe they thought that the photogs wouldn’t be at 45 degrees…
Ms. Than would rather wear ET’s skin than Fur.
did anyone notice miss fur’s nose ring
septum ring
shes pretty
Ewww, gross.
dude are you 50 or from the 1950s?
No, I’m just normal.
Normal is weird.
I see nothing wrong with fur, no one would have a problem with it if we all just started eating endangered animals, they would’nt be endangered cause people would raise them on farms! pretty soon it’ll be the cow going endangered!
are you retarded or are your parents just first cousins? go read a f**cking book or something.
anger issues ?
sanity issues. i’d like to believe that half the world isn’t a mass of idiotic ditzes bopping around thinking this shit.
like we should totally just like farm like nearly dead things cause like then they totally wouldnt be almost dead anymore and we could like eat a dinosaur oh em gee!
sadly, the at least half the world IS a a mass of idiotic ditzes. *sigh*
And exactly how do you expect these endangered animals to be bred? If conservationists who actually give a damn are having a hard time reproducing populations in their facilities, why would a farmer who just wants to make money have success?
Good lord, somebody get this idiot a book.
On a side note, I totally agree with the girls in this photo, though PETA itself is a useless joke of an organization.
Which is really sad, because PETA is a nice concept. It makes me sad, because I would like to support PETA, because I support the concept of “People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals”.. But the actual group themselves.. I have a hard time supporting.
I just love how it’s a Monty Python quote.
PETA – People for the Eating of Tasty Animals
EW what is wrong with that girl’s side?
judging from pic, id say looks like she was much heavier b4 as suggested earlier. and is excess skin after whatever miracle cure she chose.
use cure losely as someone who prefers well rounded women
I don’t even think it’s that. I think she’s just sitting at an awkward angle and the camera captured it at just the right spot. I’m sure many a thin girl looks like that when she sits, but she’s usually not naked with a camera on her.
WE HAVE A WINNER.
You’d think no one here had ever seen their side wrinkle when they sat before.
maybe a staple job gone wrong????
The scrutiny that people put a naked woman’s body through is incomprehensible to me. Maybe this has nothing to do with what they look like, no matter what your own opinion is on animal rights. but the American public has more “important” things to consider, such as “Ew that girl is not ‘perfect’ in this undoctered photo! How can I even stand to look at it?” When that has nothing to do with the issue at hand at all. (Which is. for those who can’t think past the naked girls, the issue of killing animals for fashion purposes.)
Well maybe they should have thought of a more effective way to protest that would draw attention away from them and onto the thing they are concerned about. Standing around naked has the natural effect of drawing scrutiny to yourself, period. Look at most all the comments in the lol are not about factory fur farms or the killing of animals for the fur industry. In my opinion, a womans body was created the way it is for a particular purpose, and it was not for these kinds of protests. But, people can do what they want, just don’t complain when you don’t get the reaction you would like.
I think it’s our God given right to kill animals for fashion purposes and check out the naked girls who don’t like it. But that’s just my opinion.
Amen and Hallelujah!
I’d like to burn this EF-AH-GEE.
And for the record, just because God gave humans the right to do something doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing to do.
Way to contradict yourself, genius.
How did I contradict myself? For those who believe in God, there’s the idea that he gave people free will and the ability to do whatever they choose. However, just because he gave people the ability to slaughter animals for fashion and have perverted thoughts about random naked women on the street doesn’t mean that it’s justified or moral.
I suppose in retrospect that since EF-AH-GEE only referred to the fact that it was a right and not a moral choice, my point may seem somewhat misplaced, but his flippant attitude just kind of irked me, somehow…
It was the part where you said you wanted to burn him/her and then said that just because god gave you the “right” (which you probably meant to say “ability”) to do something doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing to do..
What I’d like to know is who makes the rules as to what’s morally right and wrong? If there’s an objective moral standard, where do these ladies get the idea that it’s less wrong to be naked in public than to sport a leather jacket? If we all have to work out for ourselves what’s right and wrong, where do these ladies get the idea that they have any right to try to change anyone else’s mind by protesting in what is supposed to be a shocking manner?
Oh get over yourself. I don’t care for PETA, I’m not a vegan, I wear leather, and my only problem with fur coats is that they’re horribly out of fashion. That being said these girls aren’t hurting anyone or anything by sitting around naked. They appear to be assembling in a peaceful protest and that is something our nation embraces. Why don’t you save your offended sensibilities for something that’s worthwhile.
lol
I never said I was offended or even that I don’t care for PETA. I was simply musing on the way people arrive at the morals that they live with.
In that musing vein, my question to you is whether “not hurting anyone” is an objective moral standard or one that you decided on for yourself. If it’s objective, I’m also “not hurting anyone,” so phrases like “Oh get over yourself” are unnecessary. If you decided on it yourself, phrases like “Why don’t you…” are also unnecessary, since your decisions about morality don’t extend to me.
And no, I’m not offended by you either, slightly rude though your comment may be.
)
“where do these ladies get the idea that they have any right to try to change anyone else’s mind by protesting in what is supposed to be a shocking manner?”
Before I begin I will repeat that I don’t care one way or another about PETA and its issues. That being said the right to protest, yes even in a “shocking” manner, is one of the cornerstones of our nation. The Boston Tea Party was shocking to the British, not to mention signing the Declaration of Independence. During the civil rights movement, it was shocking to many white americans used to the status quo when African Americans sat at their lunch counters and refused to give up their seats on the bus. By your logic we can say morality is an individual decision so where do they get the right to try to change the minds of others as to the morality of they way they were being treated. Margaret Mead said, “Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” The right to peaceful, nonviolent protest is a luxury a lot people in the world don’t have and one in which you seem to take for granted. And yes, when I see somone as pompous as you I don’t need to torture myself with self-important musings on objective moral standards. I just have to know that I have the right to tell you to get over yourself.
I think the problem is that in a forum such as this, it’s easy to read too much into one another’s comments. You seem to have taken my first post as a rhetorical question, which could easily make you think that I feel myself morally superior. It wasn’t meant as such.
I only meant to poke a little fun by suggesting that they may be wrong either way, and that the only way they could support their (moral) claim that it’s better to be naked than wear fur is if there is an objective moral standard which supports it. I wasn’t necessarily saying they were immoral, only that they may be illogical.
I think the question is a good one to consider, though. Who creates moral standards? I’d be interested to know your opinion at the very least, but even more interested if you had a good argument to support it.
BGurl, your point is exactly right on the mark. They have decided that their moral standard supercedes the accepted moral standard of the vast majority of the population. And therefore they acted in a way that undermines the moral standard of that majority to make their point. Oh, and given us all an interesting picture to comment on in the process.
I bet they smell bad.
Ah yes, Lovely.
Brake the law by being naked in public to show your opinion.
Isn’t that what those terrorists do? Breaking the law to show opinion?
Anyway, Im British so I dunno.
What’s PETA anyway?
Hahahaha, and notice the person behind Mrs. Fur who is wearing Fur?
XD LOL!
People for the
Ethical
Treatment of
Animals
Their goal is to have every animal freed from what they consider slavery. This includes animals in zoos as well as pets. The main issue on their website appears to be getting people to stop using animals for food or clothing, and many members feel as strongly about this issue as people feel about human slavery. These ladies may or may not be acting for PETA, but it’s an illustration at least of how strongly they feel. Some people actually feel even stronger about the issue, and these people have been known to firebomb laboratories that experiment on animals. I don’t think PETA is publicly supportive of these organizations, though.
To better answer your question, PETA is a pathetic and phony organization that gets very little done and would rather spend their millions of dollars of annual income harassing obstinate women in fur coats and shoving edgy propaganda than actually saving any animals. They waste their time parading around and stirring up controversy and then go right back to their facilities and euthanize as many as 90% of their “rescued” animals because, as their president openly admits “It costs more money to care for and adopt out animals.”
It’s so frustrating when people don’t stand for what they speak for.
Yes, it disgusted me when I found out that PETA “animal shelters” simply killed the animals, because they spent all their money on propaganda.
They are total hypocrites.
see i personally don’t care what the women look like.
they are trying to point out the evils of killing animals so you can wear their skin. would you kill a human being to wear their skin? hello, silence of the lambs much! they are making a point through shocking means. it’s quite intelligent.
Intelligence is being able to get your point across without relying on shock value. _This_ is not intelligent
I hope the stadium cleaned those setas after they left……ewwwww!
Seats! I mean seats!
yeah. nice xtra skin there… definitely not ribs – if your ribs were that far apart, uhhhh u have issues. but seriously folks, animals will be killed, whether you eat/wear them or not. humans were omnivores – meant to eat veges and meat and grains and all that good stuff. so do what nature intended. eat em all.
Actually, its just as bad for animals if nobody eats meat or uses animal products as if we do. Its called competition for limited resources.
ew.. look at the wrinkles..
Haha. Great one! Miss fur is a fox.
Is that Simonetta Stefanelli? The girl who was Apollonia in The Godfather? Sure looks like her!
I completely support these womens rights to protest in this manner. Everyone has the right to a peaceful protest.
I also support what they’re saying. Those of you who are comparing wearing fur to wearing leather are a bit mixed up.
Leather comes from cows. We also eat the cows. If we didn’t make leather clothes from the skin of the cows, then the skin would just rot away and be wasted. Making leather coats and things is resourceful and as a carnivore, and an animal lover, I respect that.
It’s what the Indians did, using every part of the animal. I’m not against leather.
I am against fur, however. The animals that fur coats and things are made from are not a food source. They’re simply killed, skinned, and tossed away like trash. They live only to give their skin and fur, which we as a culture in this day and age do not need. Fur was used for warmth and comfort, and it was the only thing available to our ancestors. We don’t NEED fur any more. We have plenty of other things to use in it’s place. The killing of animals only for their fur is needless and cruel.
P.E.T.A.
People
Eating
Tasty
Animals
I agree with Palie Q… well, mostly. I am against ANYTHING that comes from animals, including meat and leather. How would you feel if you were killed just to be eaten or worn? And if you think you cant live without murdering these innocent animals, you are wrong. There are many fake meat prodcts that taste just like the real thing, especially food made by Morning Star. There is also faux fur, suade, and leather. They even make ugg-like boots with no animal products. How can you say you are a true animal lover if you support eating and wearing them?
I wonder what lions eat?
Why, Oh Why did they have to invent paper?
They’re sluts.
People Eating Tasty Animals
Miss Fur is fine as hell, too bad she’s a crazy vegan ecoterrorist.
What’s up the left-most woman’s torso?
*with