This operations manual is pretty vague…
Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Archive photo | In Russia Next »
This operations manual
» 93 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Nightshift100 on Progress Poker El Jefe on Has This Certain Ring to … Vikavid on Better Than Coffee Duncan on GREECE !neoritter on Progress Poker Geary on GREECE Geary on GREECE itsybit on GREECE formeraide on GREECE itsybit on GREECE 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Cyoot Kitteh of teh Day: Cup of Cute
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
No. Because you're a friggin' cat.
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Too Cute Too Resist
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Both Are Effective, But Only One Lets Me Sing
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
FLying Pig vs Marathoner
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Tiny Sniffs
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
OK
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Honestly Man, That Ain't Right
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Violation of Probation
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Wrong Luna
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Tom Hiddleston Totally Looks Like Gene Wilder
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Diamond Skull Cufflinks
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
YAY FIRST!!!
*ahem* It’s pretty damned clear for plenty of people though
Yes. Like this guy, they know the Koran instructs them to kill unbelievers.
Unfortunately for them, it does not provide instructions about how to operate an RPG-7.
wow, some people just make jerk pictures
Why is it OK to make “jerk pictures” about the Pope, but Muslims are off-limits?
And it doesn’t stop at the Pope either. Look at the way people savage Bush, but making fun of Obama is almost taboo.
Obama hasn’t F***ed up to badly yet
and people make fun of him all the time
I”m glad somebody said this. why do awesome posters like this guy seem to disappear from cheezburger? too liberal?
Actually, no. Al queda uses a modified Quran to “instruct” their members. It is an abomination. Like using the belief in god to justify waging a war in two unprovoked sovereign nations. oh wait…
Here Mr. Terrorist, let me help. You aim the pointy grenade end at your face, then you pull the trigger.
EPIC LOL
Uhoh….someone made a joke about the Kuran!
How do you know that that’s the Quran?
Great Gallopin’ Gonads of Allah! It is!
we haz one at home jus lik it in Green. it looks rite to me.
… aktually, we also haz a few translashuns of the thing.
Of course, we don’t store the Quran at the highest point in the room, so we’re very bad Muslims. Heck, we’re such bad Muslims, we’re Mennonite.
translating the Qu’ran is corruption, according to the book. Just sayin…
How many mennonite?
I don’t, but I’m going off the assumption that it is, lol.
wow. “herb” is an equal opportunity jerk
At least s/he sees the world as it is, and not through a peep-hole.
I agree with you, nice job
WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN!
OHHHHH, look for the passage that says “Thou shalt not hang thy rainbow flags”
Kinda dis respectful to make a joke about someones reliigous book, dont you think?
i think allah would think the same god would think – or what ever you want to call him/her/it – great advertisment…
i mean, c’mon… there are such a load of jokes about other religions, their books, there beliefs, their leaders… the only bad thing about it is, that extremists will see everything you say or do as bad, disrespectful or whatever they need to life out there extremism… and with them it doesn’t matter what religion it is about…
Just like one faction of the Roman Catholic church is “gunning” for Bill Maher because of his criticism of the new Pope. They’re calling for people to cancel their HBO subscribtions until he’s fired. Even most conservative Catholics think this is taking it way too far. (He sort-of apologized for calling him a Nazi because he was a youth when he took the oath to Hitler, but he didn’t rescind what he said about covering up the pedophelia scandals) . And at least HBO isn’t ABC. They’re a lot more willing to take some heat.
exactly… no matter what religion… extreme tendencies will always find something to “gun for” as you said. and the worst thing about it is, that they don’t even really do it because of the religion but for their own. and i my humble opinion… that is the real disrespect for any religion, to use it as excuse for such things.
Brava!! I totally agree.
these are methods also used by media matters and other left wing organizations, it’s a free country and people can make up their own minds, they have not put a fatwah out on him, that I know of.
no, I dont think so at all. IN fact, religiion in general is pretty disrespectful of the people it seeks to control.
Seconded…
true. That’s why Institutionalized Religion Sucks … It seeks to control people.
Personally, I like Religion that seeks to Love & Serve people. Whadda Concept, eh?
i agree… to love and serve… it’s rare but so real when you find a person who sees their religion or faith as teaching them to do that, rather than condemn. i’ve seen many people of many faiths, religions, and philosophies, who recognize the need to love and serve, and it’s really cool to see what they’re a part of in the bigger picture!
Doesn’t stop the Pope bashing here, you may have noticed.
You right, lets going back to openly mocking christianity. Thats so much easier and not politically wrong.
Sorry, if fallen soliders were game at least once, Quran is definately no exception.
Well, the Catholics won’t saw your head off with a dull knife if you mock their religion.
I know some that most certainly would.
Um… metaphorically speaking… hopefully?
I guess that’s the choice : metaphorical, slanderous or insane…
Over the past decades in the UK Catholic militants, shielded and aided by local churches and apologist priests, have been merrily bombing shopping malls, killing babies with nail bombs, massacring families attending war memorials, knee-capping teenagers, running a brutal drugs trade, doing arms deals with Libya, gouging informers eyes out with flick-knives, aiding Maxist FARC guerillas, selling surface to air missiles to ETA, developing and distributing the infrared roadside bombs which are still killing British and American soldiers in the Middle East today… Oh well, at least they’re not terrorists like those Muslims.
It has nothing to do with furthuring Catholicism now does it? It is a political movement done in the name of Catholicism isn’t it? That’s what I thought.
Islamic extremists don’t want to further Islam either. They wouldn’t care if you converted. It is a political movement in the name of Islam. There are extremists of all types, not even just religious, and no one is worse than another, they are all equally bad.
But their doctrine openly endorses as current doctrine to discriminate thsoe that aren’t in agreement with their religion. While their are musilms that aren’t in agreement with furthering it….it kind of contradicts it since many parts of the Quran endorse waging war in some way or another against those non believers.
I have no doubt in my mind that their are those that don’t agree to wage war. I’d bet 1000 dollars on it. But…..they are contradicting it.
Baloney. Their stated goal is furthering Islam.
Firstly who are “they”? There are thousands of these groups, some of which are only responsible for one attack and are never heard of before or since and many which have differing goals (to the point of fighting with each other.) But I’d like you to show me at least one with a stated goal like you say.
If you ask an islamic terrorist group about their justification they will pretty much ALWAYS talk about political justification. It’s political islam which is causing the problems and their goals are indeed political and not religious.
(Not sure if I can post urls, so google “Muslim true/false” for the souce)
“Moreover, it’s politics, not piety, that drives the small minority — just 7% — of Muslims to anti-Americanism at the level of condoning the attacks of 9/11. Looking across majority-Muslim countries, Gallup found no statistical difference in self-reported religiosity between those who sympathized with the attackers and those who did not. When respondents in select countries were asked in an open-ended question to explain their views of 9/11, those who condemned it cited humanitarian as well as religious reasons. For example, 20% of Kuwaitis who called the attacks “completely unjustified” explained this position by saying that terrorism was against the teachings of Islam. A respondent in Indonesia went so far as to quote a direct verse from the Koran prohibiting killing innocents. On the other hand, not a single respondent who condoned the attacks used the Koran as justification. Instead, they relied on political rationalizations, calling the U.S. an imperialist power or accusing it of wanting to control the world”
7% of billions of people aint a small minority rtard
Maybe you should look up the definition of minority, rtrd.
Besides what is in your skull and your pants, what is the definition of small idiot?
This site is just oozing well considered retoric and class.
If 7 out of 100 people is a small minority, 7% out of any number is a small minority. You can say it’s not a small number of people, or that 7% isn’t a small minority if you like, but saying because there’s billions of people that it’s not a small minority is evidence of total maths fail.
And 9.9999 out of 10 muslims won’t as well, ignorant tard.
Quite a lot of them will.
Islam on Campus is the most comprehensive survey ever undertaken of Muslim student opinion in the UK, based on a specially commissioned YouGov poll of 1400 students, fieldwork and interviews. The report examines students’ attitudes on key issues including religious tolerance, gender equality and integration. While the majority of Muslim students’ support secularism and democratic values, are tolerant towards other groups and reject violence in the name of their faith, Islam on Campus has also uncovered significant findings.
Killing in the name of religion:
- Just under a third of Muslim students polled (32%) said killing in the name of religion can be justified – the majority of these said killing could be justified if the religion was under attack, and 4% of all respondents supported killing in order to promote and preserve that religion.
- 60% of active members of campus Islamic societies said killing in the name of religion can be justified. By contrast, only 2% of non-Muslims agreed.
That’s some reather misleading cherry-picking from a report that concluded “British Muslim students hold a diverse and broad range of opinions. The majority of Muslim students have tolerant ideas towards other minorities, reject violence in the name of their faith and support Britain’s secular and democratic society as well as its system of governance” And it doesn’t say WHAT kind of killing can be justified – although I don’t think it shoud be justified in the name of religion I think we can agree that when Judaism was under attack it was right to go to war and kill, or do you disagree with “killing could be justified a religion was under attack”?
You can produce scary sounding statistics about anything, the What the World Thinks of God survey found that 71% of Americans would die for their God compared to 19% of Brits and that to me sounds terrifying.
Your comparison sucks. To die for God doesn’t mean the same thing as Killing in the name of Religion.
But many of them sure call for your rejection from your college if you sneak a “holy” wafer out.
“Kinda dis respectful to make a joke about someones reliigous book, dont you think?”
No. I respect everyone’s RIGHT to believe whatever they want to, but I don’t have to respect WHAT they believe. Impossible stories are still impossible no matter how they are dressed up and gilded. I enjoy reading fantasy fiction, but I am very much aware that it IS fiction; the authors are not demanding that I accept their tales as fact.
God has a sense of humor. How else would you explain Britney Spears “singing” career?
Heck, God probably spends all his/her free time on this site and all the others linked to it. And also notalwaysright.com – or watching Kevin Smith’s Dogma.
Caution: beware of the Caretrolls
Call something insane and completely lacking in proof Religion and slap it in a fancily covered book and PRESTO; instant protection from logical thought and criticism! Genius!
….
What r u calling insane stupid donkeys ass?
U r the insane one
yes its awfully disrespectful
Rule1 – Kill all the non-believers.
Rule 2 – Treat your women like livestock.
Yeah, what’s so hard to understand about that?
The second rule, I mean do we treat them as free range livestock, or battery farmed?
Well that aren’t allowed to be witnesses in Court unltess there is…..3 of them?
If they get raped it sthere fault
Stoned in public…..
Oh go ahead and point out any rules of the old testament bible, and then tell me how they have inacted them recently with in the last 500 years?
Crusades? Strictly the catholic church, a denomination of chrsitianity, they’ve since the apologized, and tell me how a priest that says you’ll go to hell/make up time in purgatory if they kill muslims how in the whold you can consider them christians.
Okay rant over….I already got my one chance so I have no excuse here.
… I don’t understand a thing you’re trying to say here… I’d love to respond, but it just makes no sense to me…
Up to Stoned in public is rules of strong islamists and what they believe.
The rest is counteracting the arguements that people might use to associate the bible as the same thing….which it isn’t.
Battery farmed, of course. That’s what polygamy is all about.
Actually, the Quran (is that how you spell it in English?) says that women are equal to men.
Why is it that only the mediocre jokes get on this site?
It’s the same reason only mediocre presidents get elected… voting by two opposing sides – only the most inoffensive middle of the road one wins
I read this as a defence of the Koran. “I’m looking in the index for a how-to on IEDs and all I can find is this lefty there-is-no-compulsion-in-religion guff” . The implication is the same as asking for the verse where Jesus talks about the Royal Ulster Constabulary.
Either way, I’m holding my sides.
Um, all religious talk aside, this guy looks like Zach Braff, to me…perhaps lost in a “Scrubs” related fantasy while taking a bunch of new residents through diversity sensitivity training…
Agreed
No Catholic oppression? Well, maybe not really this century…The Inquisition anyone? oh sorry…they didn’t cut people’s heads off with blades, the iron maiden was MUCH more humane…
ALSO, outside of a few inhumane extremists communities, you’ll find the present-day stoning-to-death in Saudi Arabia, supported by and allied with the U.S., a so-called “modern” Muslim country, so don’t blame Islam, it’s those crazy Wahabi – once again, POLITICS.
As far as polls go, the question was probably loaded, and 1400 people surveyed is HARDLY a good sample size to represent the Muslim population in the west.
Also, when you have a religious or social movement under attack or going through a major shift in its ideas or philosophy, of COURSE people are going to go on the offensive, he feel under attack. Those Muslim students probably experience prejudice and racism on a DAILY basis. If you were Cristian, and everyone was attacking Cristians, and you felt the heat of prejudice and racism continually, wouldn’t YOU be defensive? I think you WOULD.
PLUS, it was on a college campus, where everything from religion, politics, and social ideas are ALWAYS going to be more radical than the rest of the population. Come on people – read a history book.
Uh, it isn’t politics, it’s Islam. Islamic countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia don’t distinguish between religious and secular rule.
Catholics had their Inquisition, 400 years ago. Islam is still in the stage of evolution that Catholicism has surpassed.
The entire basis of Islam is proselytization by force. When Muslims kill non-Muslims, they are obeying the dictates of their Prophet.
That isn’t entirely true. The Koran specifically advocates non-violence when dealing with Christian and Jewish people.
It also says it is perfectly okay to kill them so “advocating non-violence” is meaningless. Plus it seems like many Islamofacists skipped that chapter.
Except for that one part that goes, “and on that day even the rocks and the trees will cry out, ‘Behind me hides a jew. Come and kill him.’”
Islam is not in the stage of evolution your brain is the thing that is in the stage of evolution
Also, one more thing. I DO NOT support the extremists. As other people have said, extremists of any form are not a good idea.
I’m surprised no one commented on the fact that that grenade is some serious BLING.
Don’t you mean BLAM! ?
It doesn’t matter what “stages of evolution” a religion is in. The point remains that Catholics still did prosecute and kill thousands because they misinterpreted their religious text. Being “past” that “stage” does not matter – the fact that a religious doctrine was misinterpreted and endorsed by the heads of the Catholic church occurred. Being in the past doesn’t make it any better – otherwise a major case of hypocrisy is quite apparent. PLUS – you say that Catholicism has “surpassed” Islam, as if it’s a ‘better’ religion – that’s one of the most shallow things I’ve read on this site.
The Christian Bible endorses slavery, female subjugation to males, and violence against female pagans and homosexuals… yet, thankfully, most Christians do not accept these verses. It is good that many do not adhere to the ancient exhortations of their holy books. The fact is that many religious texts tell believers that they are REQUIRED to subjugate, convert, and if not, kill those not converting to that belief system. Even if the Quran does tell a person to kill non-believers, so does the bible. They all encourage violence against non-believers. Again, fortunately, most people do NOT do so, they realize that many of these ideas are OUTDATED and they just want to live in peace with their often very multi-ethnic/religious/belief system community. History is still history, and extremists are extremists because they are few and far between.
Except that Muslim extremists are doing all those things RIGHT NOW, not hundreds of years in the past.
lama lama lama ooommm lama lama lama deerka deerka deerka jihad
You just have to get the last word in, even if your repeating yourself…how pathetic.
Just because it’s in the past doesn’t make it any less valid. WWII War Criminals committed atrocities, including mass murder. Should they get away with it just because it happened more than 60 years ago? NO! Think about what you type!
How are you going to punish people who have been dead for 300 years? Dig up their bodies and put them in jail?
Hypocrisy is still hypocrisy. All major religions like to dominate. Your comment shows just how ignorant you are…you just won’t come down from your ivory tower, will you? How sad…
omg i cant beleve your trying to blame the modern catholic curch for things the church did hundreds of years ago almost no catholics today even thing killing in the name of god and religion is anyware near exeptibal and is a ticket strait to hell and you cant say becuse it happend 400 years ago ,is still bad, i IS still bad but there isnt a single person alive that did those things. so why would you blame pepole today for it becuse there in the same church as thos pepole long ago?
The isn’t a single person alive in America that was enslaved by the Confederate States, but they still blame people today for the enslavement and think they deserver reperations. Kinda the same stuff.
Religion and race are the tools of a hateful mind. They’re a crutch for those that allow themselves to descend into the nature of humanity that leads the to lash out and attempt to kill thier own kind. Humanity by nature is violent. Look at our history. Look at all of animal kind. Humanity should be trying to overcome these base instincts leading them to violence but we don’t. Face it in the majority of all scientific advances we try to find a way to weaponize it.
Of course humanity is violent by nature, but that doesn’t always have anything to do with your religion. Some of the history’s worst atrocities have been committed by aithiests. Just look at Stalin and Mao. These were men who realized that if there’s no God, then there’s no right or wrong, and so every man can do what’s right in his own eyes.