I built the Bridge to Nowhere and they get pissed about my house remodeling?
(Ted Stevens)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous super-oppressive | ‘Cuz this Next »
» 61 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
William Thompson on Vandals Cashing In keshet the adequate on Ballistic Marshmallows Dave on Must Be Blah History Mont… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Deacon Blues on Spock Facepalm imnotreallyhere on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… LaFeeVerte on Ballistic Marshmallows imnotreallyhere on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
You blinked
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
No gurls allowed
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
Maybe if I Stay Very Still I'll Be All Right
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Great Escape
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Nom Distraction
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Two-by-Snores
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
So Why Was It The Best I've Ever Had??
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Counteract That Yoga With Cookies
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
SUCK IT, NOT TREBEK!
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Accurate Claim is ACCURATE
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
American Idol Kyle Crews Totally Looks Like The Big Green Patrick Reena
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Big Head Harry Potter Characters
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Ring of the Day: I'm Batman
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
String Theory
Wedinator - Your special day... is hilarious.
Skyrim First Dance
Five Minute Getaway - Beautiful Travel and Vacation Photos
Gaudí-esque complex, Punta del Este, Uruguay
Set Phasers to LOL - Sci Fi and Fantasy LOLs
I Didn't Know
Animal Memes - A Meme-nagerie of Famous Internet Critters
Crazy Girlfriend Praying Mantis: It Was My Doctor. He Says I'm Dying. How Bad Do You Feel Now, Lady?
first!!!!
Congrats Kroenen! You are the first assnuggetdouchenozzlecrotchwafflebeyatchdingleberrynerdhagfooldick.
Congrats, Steve, on feeding the troll, and validating Kroenen’s existence. Also, congratulations on increasing your typing efficency by removing those pesky spaces.
Um… so trolls are feeding trolls. AT least they are taking care of their own.
thats a BAD thing
Prediction : score for this one will go up when Certain People realize there’s an (R) after the name of this guy they don’t recognize. Just sayin’.
Called it!
Instigated it even.
d00d… you don’t think the Live At Five Weatherman makes it rain, do yuh?
Building implies tangible progress. Senator Stevens just fussed about the bridge to nowhere in a national forum until the governor finally canned the project due to an overwhelming lack of funding.
Somewhere, the makers of the $1,500 toilet seat are mourning the loss of their best client.
The Internet is not a big truck. It’s a series of tubes!
Wow. Using the word “tube” as a metaphor instead of “pipe” or “pipeline” or “highway” or “wire” or “stream”. How. Terrible.
You heard this guys full speech from which that quote was taken? He’s an ignorant putz when it comes to the Internet. That said, ever since hearing that I’ve called the Internet the “tubes” when talking to people who get it. You can make a lot of neat analogies. Places like 4chan etc are corroded leaky pipes, with a lot of buildup on the inside.
Yes, I did hear it. And all that the speech indicates is use of a slightly different buzzword than the norm. Such “lapses” are exactly the kind of thing that (especially non-techie) folks fixate on, so they can feel smarter than someone else.
I think the reason that people fixated on this was because it illustrated how the question of net neutrality was in the hands of people who so obviously did not understand how the internet works.
… so you are merely assuming the premise. Using the word “tube” instead of “pipe” carries no difference in *meaning*. Simply assuming that someone who uses the term “tube” instead of “pipeline” (or any of the other, more standard metaphors) has very little foundation.
Now, if you’re REALLY saying that it was politically useful to pretend that thee was some kind of Deep Significance to the use of the word “tube”, I have no argument there – making the “other side” look bad is always USEFUL at some level… whether the means is honest or not.
It wasn’t just a different buzzword and it wasn’t some innocuous situation. He was explaining how a system works to a bunch of old, clueless curmudgeons like himself that are supposed to be making informed decisions for an entire nation.
He basically equated the Internet and all things related to the Internet as a nationwide system of Pneumatic Tubes. That’s like saying a graphing calculator is just a glorified abacus – while a graphing calculator performs some of the same functions as the abacus, it’s completely misleading and distorted, especially when you’re trying to describe to a large group of clueless people how it works.
Here’s Ted Stevens’ full “series of tubes” speech:
It’s called an analogy. People the people that developed the Internet and it’s underlying protocols use very similar analogies … and have for DECADES!
BTW, on a very real level, a graphic calculator IS similar to an abacus.
Sheesh.
Defensive Defensive.
A graphic calculator is similar to an abacus in the same way a pointy stick is similar to a tank. Yeah, you can get the same things done, but one is far more advanced and more effective than the other. The whole concept of distributed networks and packet switching goes against the tubes analogy. IF the internet were primarily circuit switching based, then yes, tubes would be appropriate, but its not.
NEVER insult ANY republican!!!!!
Wow…. you just can’t get it in your head that some things aren’t “Republicans vs Democrats” … can you?
Heh… you have no clue, do you? Metaphors and analogies have no requirement to describe EVERY part of a system, just the aspects that are under discussion.
I note, in passing, that the more standard “pipe” terminology is just as bad as the “tube” terminology that you are obsessed with. I guess a few decades of computer scientists, network engineers and programmers have all been wrond.
Sheesh.
Actually, I AM a computer engineer, and for the most part, WE don’t use that terminology, marketing people and the media do.
“For the most part” == weasel words.
I’m a software engineer and my last three jobs have been at major internet companies … and such terminology is used all the time … WHEN THAT IS THE CORRECT LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION.
It’s unclear to me that you are working at the level where the metaphor applied; it is fairly clear that the analogy applies; it is silly, though, to infer that the lack of application to you particular job means that “pipe” terminology is always and everywhere invalid.
People use “tubes” all the time?
Read the context. I was obviously referring to the word “pipe”
There is no difference between “pipe” and “tube” with respect to the analogical use…. semantically, they are the same.
You have no case.
acshully, teh apropriat wurd is teh “intarwebs”
get it rite!!
lol speak
ur doin it rong!
kthxbai
lolbammy == weasel words.
Fact remains, you needed to qualify your statement.
So, I don’t know if you realize this, but it really isn’t necessary to defend a guy that everyone knows is wrong just because he is a member of the party you support. He gets made fun of for the tubes speech not because its a different metaphor (pipeline is a crappy metaphor as well BTW), but because the speech made it clear that he had no idea what he was talking about, yet he was trying to influence policy. This is a problem with politicians as a whole, left right, up the middle, whatever. They feel like because they can legislate things, they should (in order to justify their own existence), even when they are fawking clueless. SO get over the whole Rep vs Dem thing, because that has nothing to do with it.
BWAHHAHAH!
WTF are you talking about? I thought this wanna-be technoid fixation on the word “tubes” was funny long before I knew the guy’s party affiliation. I find it doubly funny here, where silly assumptions about party add to the silliness of the fixation.
And yet you contradict yourself. You claim you thought it was funny long before you knew his party (I find that hard to believe since there is a little R or D next to everyone nowadays.), but then you rush do his defense “Wow. Using the word “tube” as a metaphor instead of “pipe” or “pipeline” or “highway” or “wire” or “stream”. How. Terrible.” when others say it is funny. So which is it? Is it funny or isn’t it. Maybe you should be a politician, you seem to want it both ways.
You need to read for comprehension. I found the FIXATION ON HIS USE OF THE WORD “TUBES” to be funny, long before I knew if he was an (R) or a (D) Not the use of the word itself.
BTW, I first read about this silly “issue” on a blog that didn’t specify his party affiliation.
Way to focus on the issue at hand, which is of course the “witch hunt” of Stevens, and not whether policy should be made by people who are ignorant of the subject matter (which was my original point. I could give two shits about which party the guy is tied to). I am just as critical of Al Gore attempting to influence environmental policy when he doesn’t practice what he tries to force on everyone else.
And, once again, you simply assume his complete ignorance, presumably based on your terminology fetish.
Furthermore, you’re the ones that made an issue of party affiliation, not ,e…
Actually, no. I heard his speech, from which it is evident that he does not have a clue. Take off the blinders, man. You DON’T have to defend him just becuase he is a member of your party. I never said anything about party affiliation. You don’t know what party I belong to, if any. I merely said you don’t have to defend every republican, even when they are wrong.
u r so rite!!
yay
You also missed my whole point that people without a clue about the subject matter have no business attempting to legislate it based on what their “employers” tell them. I could give two shits about which party the guy belongs to, he still doesn’t know what he is talking about. I criticize Al Gore just as much (and many others from both parties) for trying to influence environmental policy when he doesn’t even practice what he preaches.
The problem, though, is that your case is built on use of the word “tubes”. That’s it.
Uhm, no. Its built on his lack of understanding (gleaned from the overall context of the speech, which I’ve pointed out numerous times). Please provide even one citation showing he has even basic knowledge of what he was talking about.
No, the man actually does think the Internet is a series of tubes. He was not speaking metaphorically.
Hmm… that makes it all the more amazing that he was able to generate an analogy that legitimate computer scientists, such as Edward Felten, have been able to identify as valid.
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1042
What makes him legit, the fact that he has a blog? In all seriousness, the “cleaned up” transcript shows that he doesn’t know what he is talking about. As your guy points out, Stevens’ claims about traffic slowdown are ill-informed at best. The majority of traffic slowdowns result from Server Loading and local (consumer) bandwidth restraints, NOT because the “tubes” are full. You CAN always add more fiber lines and switches to the internet to provide near-infinite capacity (at least with IPv6). Your example of Felten even agrees, though in a softer manner, that Stevens was wrong: “The bottom line? Stevens may have been trying to make a coherent argument. [u]It’s not a great argument[/u], and his examples were poorly chosen, but it’s far from the worst argument ever heard in the Senate.”
Heh. Cuz Ceiling Cat told you so?
Hmm. So you’re objection is that you think that the Internet IS a “big truck”? You might be thinking of UUCP.
Hmm. So your objection is that you think that the Internet IS a “big truck”? You might be thinking of UUCP.
Regardless of whatever. We love him. He brings us monies so we can has more tubes.
Teh Dems hate teh tubes, cuz tehy thinks u can pump oils in dem.
What?
He may be old and stupid, but anyone who is from AK and has had to go to Ketchikan by plane (and I’ve lived there) knows they need the bridge. It’s not to nowhere, it’s to the freakin airport, and currently the whole situation sucks because you have to wait for the little ferry to cart everyone in front of you to the other side before you cram in with your group. They might actually save money in the long run because they wouldn’t need to maintain the boats, pay for the fuel, pay the captain, etc.
Here’s a write up by a Computer Science Prof. Note that he states that the “tubes” analogy is ok… even though he disagrees with the Senator. Y’all could learn from his example.
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1042
The tubes analogy would make some sense if he weren’t using it to imply a limited capacity to the internet (a la plumbing) that does not actually exist.
Heh. Sooooo…. you imagine that the pipe/wire/offramp/tube/stream that runs to any individual house has UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH? When was this magical infinite-speed transmission invented?
For that matter, you seem to imagine that “pumping” has some kind of upper bound, as if pipes can’t be made larger or more pipes added to a system.
You seem to be wrong on both sides of the analogy.
Actually, HE was talking about the internet backbone, not internet to your house. Net neutrality has NOTHING to do with individual houses. The very nature of packet switching was designed so that the networks DO NOT act like a pipe with limited throughput, due to the myriad paths available to each data packet. Obviously, the end points will always be the same for a given file, but the path through the middle need not be. By the way, bandwidth is not a measure of speed, but capacity, which is an entirely different matter. Maybe you should come back when you have a grasp of the underlying technologies.
Once again, you are trying to avoid the issue by focusing on pipes and tubes. As i said before, a lot of the furor is not over the word choice, so much as the ignorance implied by the word choice in the context of his speech. Come back when you actually have something relevant to the issue to say.
I can’t recall who mentioned it, but I second a comment heard on the airwaves: if Stevens was going to funnel elicit funds into his house, he should of hired a better designer. Thing looks like crap.
But hey, at least it wasn’t an under-aged immigrant call-boy in a bus station toilet!
“But hey, at least it wasn’t an under-aged immigrant call-boy in a bus station toilet!”
Nah, it was a toothless Eskimo with a pick-up truck under an incomplete bridge abutment…or maybe it was Colonel Mustard in the Den with the blender…I dunno…
“Bridge To Nowhere”: *almost* a Talking Heads reference.
Ok, first off, the inter-tubes is now a slang reference to the internet. The man’s added to the lexicon. Give him some credit there (or the lobbyists who wrote the speech for him).
Next, does no one realize that this is the same jerk who screamed (literally) when the Senators were attempting to make the Oil Company executives swear to tell the truth when they we called to DC? So, in their “explanations” they were free to (and took great liberties to indulge in) lie through their teeth to the Senate and the American people, and not in any way be held accountable for it!
Ugh, do you guys have any idea how many politicians here in the AK have been convicted of bribery among other kinds of corruption in the past year or so? Everyone was involved in Veco, a company that bribed a LOT of people involved with things mostly dealing with the oil (highly lucrative business, just look at the PFDs {Permanent Fund Dividends} Not that I’m complaining about them, though, haha).
I have no faith in the state at the moment, and Ted Stevens… Go to jail, please. Get the heck out of our government. We don’t need you here. Seriously.
I’m personally glad Palin is cracking down on gvt. corruption with these new bills, and regardless of anything about her she has done some pretty good things for the state. While I’m a bit iffy about the government spending so much money with these Energy Rebates, I’m sure it will help a lot of the villages (8 dollars a gallon for gas?!) and rural community.
Also, love this pic. Makes me crack up, as long as I don’t think about the seriousness of the whole matter.