Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Dear Lord,


Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

Dear Lord, protect our nuts from Jesse Jackson.

Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: bbrucker2

» Recaption This

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 71 comments

  1. lolbammy says:

    Nuts to you, who wanted to type “first”.

  2. Wait… the last two LOLs have been about “balls” and “nuts”.

    I know what you’re doing there.

    Stop it; you’re making me TESTY!

  3. haha wat says:

    lol mccain is old

  4. Brucker says:

    Aw, crap. I was going to pull this one down because I had second thoughts on its tastefulness, and now everyone’s favoriting it and it’s my first one to be put up on the main page. Obviously, I’m not being nearly crude enough.

  5. ema says:

    “our” nuts? there is at least one other person in that picture that doesn’t have to worry about Jesse Jackson!

  6. Ryan says:

    Oh great, another Bush is stupid joke.

  7. ema says:

    Obama is a rock star

  8. mutta says:

    This is Bobby Rush (D-Chicago) announcing that he is cancer-free after a serious battle with (I think) salivary cancer. Jesse’s brood were among those angling for Bobby’s office as soon as his illness was disclosed. Good job, Bobby! May you remain healthy & happy.

  9. hueydoc says:

    Ummm- Is it just me or did the pictures just shrink and the ads grow on this page ?

  10. 3ntropy says:

    AAAAYYYYYYYYY-MEEEEEEEEEEEN! penis.

  11. jellybeans says:

    And protect our 14 year old daughters from Republicans!
    Anyone else disgusted by the fact that a guy who “engaged in deviate sex against her will” with the 14 year old daughter of his extra-marital love bunny is being charged with a class C felony – not to exceed 7 years?
    Another champion of the moral high-ground is wallowing in the gutter.
    Defend him if you can Repugs, you like baby rapers right?

    • Wolvie says:

      Do baby murdering democrats take the moral high-ground then? Oh wait that is right dems are all about having no morals I forgot.

      • jellybeans says:

        You can talk about democrats having no morals? Seriously?
        You have one guy caught soliciting sex in an airport bathroom.
        One guy using the page system as a dating service (starting when they are underage)
        One guy getting caught with hookers on the tax payer’s dime
        The new guy raped a 14 year old …
        Thank GOD Democrats don’t share your morals.

    • Evil Pundit says:

      Take your meds and lie down.

      • Seth says:

        That’s your response when one of yours rapes a 14 year old? Are your TRYING to earn the name ‘Repug?’ I guess defending the indefensible is what you do best, and you’ve got plenty of practice.

        • Evil Pundit says:

          No, this is my response when a libtard goes hysterical for no apparent reason.

          • ema says:

            Obama has a thin lead in the polls and Hillary is demanding her supporters be counted at the covention – bad news for Obama. Expect more shreaking…

            • jellybeans says:

              From you guys? maybe.

              • steve says:

                Actually, all complaining about “McCain is old” and “Bush is Dumb” jokes aside, the Republicans by and large have been happy to, once again, sit by and let the Douchnozzles continually shoot themselves in the foot.

          • Evil Pundit's Evil Twin Brother says:

            I am forced to agree with you. The apocalypse is coming.
            What does Jesse Jackson saying that we must neuter our politicians have to do with this!?!?

        • ema says:

          ANYONE that rapes a 14 year old should be shot. First neutered, then shot.

          • Evil Pundit says:

            I don’t see what this has to do with Republicans, though.

            It’s just a smear. Expect a lot more as Obama slips in the polls.

            • ema says:

              Exactly, it has nothing to do with Republicans or Democrats, there are assholes in BOTH parties, also we have laws that take care of these things.

              • jellybeans says:

                Ah but the laws seem to go more gently for some … less than 7 years for raping a 14 year old?

              • jellybeans says:

                It is a “republican” issue because your party tries to claim some sort of moral high-ground on sexual issues but then your elected officials are the ones breaking all these highminded ideals.
                This baby raper signed a bill toughening sentencing for sex crimes against children – he gets “not to exceed 7 years or $5,000″?
                Your party is against gay marriage and pretty much gays in general and yet 2 of your officials have been busted in lurid gay sex scandals including soliciting teenagers.
                Your party is full of hypocrites it seems.

                • ema says:

                  Democrats are against the death penalty and killers routinely get out of jail and rape and kill children again.

                  • jellybeans says:

                    Some in less than 7 years! I bet he gets house arrest.

                    • jellybeans says:

                      You are missing my point here though Ema – your party in general are against Sex ed, Gay rights and Women’s rights (in so far as abortion and birth control are concerned). So far your party officials have been caught in situations involving gay airport sex, gay underage solicitation for sex and raping a minor.
                      To add insult to injury this rapist is not charged with statutory rape or with rape at all. He is charged with a class C felony and will be softballed on the sentence.
                      Yay for Republican morals!!!

                      • ema says:

                        Just because a person does not live up to the rules, does not make the rules bad, or others who claim to want to live by the rules bad. Also, I would like to see some details of the case, who and how the sentence was decided by, etc. I am not sure at all the light sentence had anything to do with his party affiliations. I still think it is wrong what he did even if she was consenting I would think it wrong.

                      • steve says:

                        Republicans are not against sex ed, they disagree about who should be doing the educating. Why are we going to let school systems that fail to teach elementary math and english teach about sex? As far as gay rights, I would argue that Gays have extra-equal rights in terms of protection under hate crimes legislation. Marriage is not a right under law, it is a privelege. I cannot marry whomever I want to either. Marriage is granted as a right only by certain states and several churches. Want to make things better all the way? Get government out of the marriage business all together and let people’s churches decide. All legal issues should be handled through contract law. And we Republicans must apologize for fighting for babies’ rights more than we do women’s rights. I wish that Dems would consider babies’ rights once in a while. I cannot believe they get away with hating babies the way they do.

                        • jellybeans says:

                          So .. no marriage for agnostics?
                          Freedom of religion?
                          If more parents actually taught their children about sex and consequences there would be fewer abortions.
                          Women should have the right to chose what they do with their bodies. Sometimes that right is taken away as in this little girl’s case. Would you honestly condemn a 14 year old rape victim to a life of misery by making her carry that child? Sorry Becky, no future for you. I guess you should have been a good girl and not gotten yourself raped.

                        • EF-AH-GEE says:

                          Of course what you say makes perfect sense, that is if you completely discount an unborn babies right to be considered human. Yes it is unspeakably horrible that someone would become pregnant as the result of a rape. But does that mean we condemn the innocent baby to an unspeakably horrible death by abortion. Rape used to be a capitol offense crime, but we became too “”civilized” to put the offenders to death for their crimes. But now we put the unborn children to death in ways that no semi-civilized nation would do to the most heinous of murders.
                          The only way someone can justify abortion is to ignore science and try to pretend that a “fetus” is not a human being. Which any honest, thinking human being cannot believe for a second.

                      • Free2B says:

                        I claim no side, no party (you can’t fly with only a right or only a left wing). You present a fallacious argument. You cannot claim that an evil man who has acted hypocritically against a set of morals makes anyone who follows that set of morals a hypocrit. It makes no logical sense. It is not the fault of the ideal, if the ideal was never persued. It is the fault of that truely evil man, and anyone who defends him. If the Republican party, as a unit, defends him then they are guilty. The people involved and responsible for any sentance less than life imprisonment, castration, or death are also quilty. But, you can not blame a group of people for the sins of the one who claims an association.

                • steve says:

                  So because one does it, that means the point is wrong? Hardly. Republicans do claim the moral high ground. The result of the claim is that when one does something wrong, they are forced to resign. The result of Democrats constantly avoiding any sense of morality is that when they do something they shrug their shoulders, say “What did you expect?!”, and pretend like nothing happened.

          • Trainwreck Chaser says:

            I honestly believe that those who molest underage children need castration. But I am not a law maker so my opinion doesn’t matter.

  12. Trainwreck Chaser says:

    ANyone see the add below this (may have changed) that endorses ‘John McCain’ and it isn’t the current McCain running?

    I’m guessing the name John and Jon play a significant difference here, but if not, FAIL!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up