Comments on: This one

By: anonymous momma

anonymous momma — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:30:58 +0000

lol he’s a child molester!!!!

By: itsybit

itsybit — Tue, 17 May 2011 03:39:50 +0000

How? How did you?… Never mind.

By: TRINA

TRINA — Tue, 17 May 2011 03:22:00 +0000

I do not see anything funny at all about this picture. Maybe if some of you assholes that are laughing would dedicate your life for others like he does, we would’nt have so many of you losers in the world!!

By: katsRme

katsRme — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:39:47 +0000

How long are we going to keep this pic on the web? Old, just very old. And, it wasn’t funny the first time.

By: Danbala

Danbala — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:35:45 +0000

Great and all … but HOW did your post end up not being exactly at the bottom?

By: Bee

Bee — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:33:10 +0000

i think my grandma has that hat, dude….

By: Igor the Vigorous

Igor the Vigorous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:59:21 +0000

Who would EVER google a pope’s name and something that envelops the penis? I mean really, why would you even WANT to see the resulting pictures for that?

By: Clint

Clint — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:44:48 +0000

Poop!

By: Johny

Johny — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:48:56 +0000

I have to poop.

By: Johny

Johny — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:50:12 +0000

I can has a bite pls?

By: cáit ní léoid

cáit ní léoid — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:08:00 +0000

Men, white people, heterosexuals and Christians (and other false categories) are doing all right for themselves though really, aren’t they

By: patricia

patricia — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:18:13 +0000

…..

By: Kurt

Kurt — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:50:50 +0000

Can’t do that one Jane, I already put out the conspiracy that Dubya trolls these forums under the name Evil Pundit.

By: Guess Again

Guess Again — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:46:53 +0000

I was gonna do a “spanish inquisition” or “pimp hat” joke…but people beat me to the punch…so….I had to go with alternative homur….
must restrain…can’t…hold…back….no..noooooooooo….

What’s the difference between a pile of dead babies and corvette?

I don’t have a corvette in my garage…

MWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!

By: Guess Again

Guess Again — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:44:54 +0000

How many babies does it take to paint a wall?

Depends on how hard you throw them!

MWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:33:38 +0000

When you have something truely intelligent to say, noone cares about your grammar. The people who care about grammar, simply don’t have anything intelligent to say.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:20:38 +0000

You are over-reading. I did not say it was likely, nor would I have attempted to imply it. I said they were not 100% effective. I am not made up of opinions. In a very pragmatic sense, only 99% effective makes the Pope 1% right (ergo: not ‘totally wrong’). Provided they use latex ,and not natural membrane condoms (only 90% effective), or female condoms (34% effective, and the most popular form in Africa among professional women), then they can have sex with someone carrying the virus and be 99% sure you won’t contract it. I say only what I mean, and I mean what I say. I don’t imply. But, thank you for calling me out. It did force me to re-examine my source; a habit I sometimes need to be reminded to enforce. The size difference statistic applies to natural membrane condoms only. But, in the future, please don’t presume to tell me what I’m saying.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:28:42 +0000

It’s not enough to say something is wrong. Can you provide evidence to the contrary?

By: Ignatz

Ignatz — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:35:29 +0000

There is no medical procedure titled ‘partial birth abortion’. The term describes several different procedures, performed in approximately 1.4% of all abortion cases.

Misinformation fail.

By: Ignatz

Ignatz — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:25:19 +0000

needs a feather.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:59:48 +0000

Hehehe…..He said McCain is old *giggle-snort*

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:58:07 +0000

Yes and Saul was a persecutor of Christians before he became Paul. Oh people can’t change I guess.

By: Get real

Get real — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:59:56 +0000

Put him in the bouncy chair!

By: PortlandMark

PortlandMark — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:34:20 +0000

Troll much?

By: Kurt

Kurt — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:47:06 +0000

what’s wrong with twisted? My walking stick is twisted and it serves just fine. Same thing with licorice. It’s twisted and pretty darn tasty.

By: Kurt

Kurt — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:44:31 +0000

Is it called being tolerant when a conservative goes on a shooting spree in east tennesee churches because the churche’s views are too liberal for his liking?

By: lamelittleme

lamelittleme — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:22:01 +0000

lOLZ!1

By: Sra. X

Sra. X — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:40:47 +0000

In such a context imagination is a bad thing,and will lead people down many a twisted road.

By: bootlegmarkchapman

bootlegmarkchapman — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:40:38 +0000

Shit, really? Do you meet people who use words much?

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:33:29 +0000

In my effort to make sense out of my jumbled thoughts, I seem to have forgotten the difference between to and too. Fail on me.

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:31:33 +0000

This is a very well written post. I think it supports the position many independents are in when they say they don’t vote for the party but try to pick the candidate they like better. From my cynical point of view I have an overwhelming of mistrust in all politicians, the nature of the game is such that I can’t always believe they are going to do what they say they do. I think many people follow parties because they are reasonably assured that as far afield as their candidate may go, they are more than likely not going to go to far against their own party. It is a security blanket for many voters, so they pick a party that matches up with MOST of their ideals and then trust that their candidate cares more about their career and won’t stray to far from the party. Of course you also have the people that vote party politics because they’re lazy and it’s easy, but the above is my cynical reason for being a democrat. Also, being a democrat hasn’t prevented me from voting for republican senators for my home state that I thought would do a better job than their opposition.

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:24:45 +0000

Thank you!!! [clappity clappity}

By: bittervoter

bittervoter — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:41:07 +0000

Um, dime in a basketball hoop? You’re saying the aids virus is very likely to be transmitted through a condom when you say that, which is flat out wrong. There’s a reason doctors use latex gloves, etc, because contamination through latex is virtually impossible, and when using a latex condom correctly, they are over 99 % effective.

By: Rosemary

Rosemary — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:01:03 +0000

Actually, this was pretty much exactly the standpoint of the Vatica under John Paul II.

By: Rosemary

Rosemary — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:59:26 +0000

Jadebullet, get your facts straight. For example, google “John Paul AIDS Ccondom” and look for Pope Benedict on Wikipedia.

And in Nazi Germany, you would probably have toppled the government single-handedly or at least would have died trying, right?

By: PiMan

PiMan — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:27:14 +0000

An interesting post. All you need now is the truth.

By: TheLarrikin

TheLarrikin — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:28:25 +0000

Most of us were not sympathetic to Nazism. In fact, most were only loyal for fear of death to themselves or their loved ones. We were lucky enough to be third generation Aussie Americans by this time. Some of the rest of our family was not. I’m 7th gen American, and stories are still told. Many of you have no clue, to put it simply.

By: Mesocyclops

Mesocyclops — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:49:55 +0000

You really are a self-righteous babe with no idea on what it means to live under a dictatorship.

By: Rosemary

Rosemary — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:37:52 +0000

Really?

The Vatican’s stand on condoms and AIDS under John Paul II:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29404-2005Jan22.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/oct/09/aids

And I reckon you yourself don’t want to be judged from characteristics of others…
So why do you do it with others?
http://bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/cjrelations/topics/new_pope_defied_nazis.htm
http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word101405.htm#five

And what does Pope Pius II has to do with this?

Get your facts straight.

By: Trainwreck Chaser

Trainwreck Chaser — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:04:53 +0000

Yes but….Seth doesn’t have a profile

The plot thickens

By: hueydoc

hueydoc — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:09:14 +0000

How about ” You can have my toy holster and cap guns, my child, but I’ma keeping the hat!”?

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:03:35 +0000

They did, but Obama killed the IL Born-live Infants Protection Bill as an IL Senate committee Chairman in 2003. That bill would only have protected infants born alive during abortion from being left to die. Partial birth abortions are illegal, but infants that would otherwise survive with food and standard medical attention can be neglected and left to die of starvation or preventable medical complication (whichever comes first). If a woman is not intending to have an abortion, they call this murder. The bill was copied off a Federal bill that passed by Congress in 2003, was not even opposed by NARAL.

Also Obama voted “present” as an IL Senator on a bill banning partial birth abortion. With a majority vote of “yes,” a vote of “present” means is counted as a no. And, he voted against a bill in 2000 banning State funding for partial birth abortion. Though both bills made provision for the life of the mother, they did not make allowances for the ‘health’ of the mother.

Even without supporting partial birth abortion, Obama’s views on abortion are still relatively extreme.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:52:28 +0000

Liberal and Conservative are both social theories. All theories are open to interpretation. From their pedestal of superiority, false pride, and hate the KKK interpreted conservative ideals in a way that suited their selfish nature. The problems come when we elevate theories to socio-political denominations. Wether it’s right or wrong, identifying yourself with a group is to have the blame for the actions of all others claiming the same associative identity projected on you. The most extreme interpretation of Liberalism results in emperial Communism. How many Liberals are willing to support that? About as many Conservatives would support the KKK. The ideal, of course, is to claim no association at all. Would you vote for a bad policy just because it has the label ‘Liberal’ or ‘Conservative’ attached to it? Don’t cheapen yourselves to be just one part of an idea that can never be 100% right in every situation.

By: jamisings

jamisings — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:27:11 +0000

But Soviet Russia doesn’t exist anymore. Therefore the jokes are obsolete. I mean, if you’re going to do Comunism jokes, do it based on a country that still lives under that regeime, like China.

By: Kurt

Kurt — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:12:02 +0000

no, he doesn’t eat babies, he’s catholic, he raises them so when they get to the age of 8 or so he’ll have someone to…….you know what, no good is going to come of me finishing this post, so I’ll let everyone use their imagination on where it was going.

By: Kurt

Kurt — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:07:22 +0000

SOME of them are still funny. Like any other joke, you gotta do it right or else it’s a fail.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:30:58 +0000

We can all agree that no party holds a monopoly on individuals disposed to closed-minded predjudices.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:28:52 +0000

Won’t be nearly as funny in the next decade.

By: HumorFail

HumorFail — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:26:53 +0000

Chances of not getting aids while wearing a condom are better, but it’s not 100% effective. The difference in size between the HIV virus and the microscopic holes present in all condoms would make it like throwing a dime through a basket ball hoop. From a strictly pragmatic point of view, he wasn’t totally wrong.

By: ema

ema — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:02:53 +0000

Actually I was thinking to myself, that baby looks plump enough for me! Hand it over here!! It is a cute baby….