-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Does he | Pimpin’ Next »
» 174 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Nightshift100 on Progress Poker El Jefe on Has This Certain Ring to … Vikavid on Better Than Coffee Duncan on GREECE !neoritter on Progress Poker Geary on GREECE Geary on GREECE itsybit on GREECE formeraide on GREECE itsybit on GREECE 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Cyoot Kitteh of teh Day: Cup of Cute
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
No. Because you're a friggin' cat.
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Too Cute Too Resist
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Both Are Effective, But Only One Lets Me Sing
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
FLying Pig vs Marathoner
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Tiny Sniffs
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
OK
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Honestly Man, That Ain't Right
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Violation of Probation
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Wrong Luna
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Tom Hiddleston Totally Looks Like Gene Wilder
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Diamond Skull Cufflinks
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
Quick someone call this racist.
Nice oblique agitprop.
Get back under yer bridge.
Oblique is a cryptoracist term. Don’t think we don’t know what you’re trying to do, fascist!
You’re so crazy….you’re a genius.
Should be Frobamanation.
I don’t think it’s racist, just lame.
There is nothing racist about this, everyone else in that picture is blacker than Obama is.
It’s so sad that you are representative of other Americans. Have fun at Wal Mart today!
Something wrong with Wal-Mart?
US money directly pipelined to China.
What isn’t wrong with Wal-Mart?
I think lolnathan was told by his employers not to paint the company in a negative image.
Who said I was American? It’s so sad that you are a representative of supposed intelligence.
Yeah. But he can’t fool us, eh?
Blacker?
That threw me too, but I think he is saying Obama is not all that black??
Sarcasm.
…Dude, I’m literally colour blind, and I can tell that Obama’s the darkest guy in that picture.
From FroBama to NoBama…
The 70′s were much cooler, but this is pretty awesome. Maybe after he’s elected he can grow his hair back out again.
Yeah! I love big afros!
I like big fros and I cannot lie,
You other sistas can’t deny,
When a man walks by with pubes on his head
and Velcro above his bed
I get sprung out…
Oh, I get it… You are this generation’s poster image for “this is you brain on drugs” because we have now found something less intelligent than a fried egg and a single celled plant. On a positive note, isn’t this campaign great. I get to listen to all of the great 70′s funk music once again. Awesome!
So serious…so very serious. Go be negative on some othe website.
You’re an angry person- tell me about your childhood…..
Not heard of ‘Sir Mixalot’ then?
LOL! Not sure ‘sprung out’ works in this gender context tho…
I had nothing else. I tried. Oh wait! Nipples get sprung out!
YAY! GO ME!
D’uh! *Ob*viously!
My bad!
I’ve always thought of that as being more a firming process than a springing one, but I s’pose it’s both elastic and centrifugal.
Sadly, that may change my mind slightly on voting for him.
Good, Obama doesn’t need the retard vote. He knows McCain’s got that locked in.
I dunno. There are quite a few on either side of the aisle… Probably above and below… …
Srsly? Srsly. How can you think this is racist? He’s sportin’ a ‘fro; you can’t deny that (though I will admit it’s not a very impressive one). ‘Fro + Obama = FrObama. No racism, just an observation of a particular hairstyle.
*sigh* Noone’s called this racist. This happens all the time people going “Someone will call this racist” “I can’t believe people think this is racist” “OMG, people think everything’s racist!” when no-one’s actually said anything of the sort.
I know, this lol is probably a lost cause now, it will be full of nothing but explanations of how this is not racist…
This is not racist!!!11!1ONE!!!@!
Hawt.
he’s workin that fro and that plaid shirt!
Damn… I love old pictures…
Yeah, this makes me smile.
It’s certainly a different look…
So?Bama
Kind of wishing Obama were a fatty tatty, rather than a skinny um… skinny guy. Then it could be FATSObama.
In spanish he could be flacobama! (flaco = skinny)
Nice one!
I don’t care what other people think. I say Obama looks great in that afro.
High five.
Down low!
what he really needs though are votes left and right… oh well! he looks good.
He’ll get them. He’s got cross-party appeal, and the opposition has nothing going for him except being a white guy. (oh noes, reverse racism!)
Obama has nothing going for him except being a black guy. And he can’t even get the votes of all the Democrats, because the Hillary supporters are upset about the way she shafted him.
Yeah, hate to say it, with his poor VP choice in Biden. . .he has all ready lost the election.
I doubt that. Biden brings a lot to the table. It pisses off the Hillary folk, but they were already hard-wired to the pissed-off position, so that’s no loss.
Not true, I was a Hillary supporter and I’m not angry at all.
You might not be, but here’s a quote from the latest CNN poll:
“Sixty-six percent of Clinton supporters — registered Democrats who want Clinton as the nominee — are now backing Obama. That’s down from 75 percent in the end of June. Twenty-seven percent of them now say they’ll support McCain, up from 16 percent in late June.”
Those twenty-seven percent apparently hate women’s rights, which Clinton and Obama BOTH stand for, and McCain stands against.
Because 100% of Clinton supporters are women…
People believe what they want to believe – it’s the parties that try to say what you *should* believe. McCain doesn’t stand *against* women’s rights, though he might not be *as* ‘for’ them as the alternatives. It’s rarely, if ever, only for *or* against, and people who believe thusly are a big reason for the breakdown in interpartisan communication in America.
Extending this thought process *beyond* America now and again wouldn’t hurt either, would it?
NB: not suggesting you personally don’t, TheLarrikin et al.
Very true. Glad to know that some people still have minds, on a site where they can so easily be lost.
Does a LOLcat have the Buddha Mind?
Sorry!
Obama stood against women’s rights by running a sexist campaignn against Hillary Clinton. That’s what her supporters are upset about.
McCain stands for women’s rights by supporting human rights — notably the right to life and the right to free speech, both of which Obama opposes.
Ah, yes, I remember the long chin stroke, the look of anguish, and the inability to say anything on the subject because he didn’t know enough… so did he come out and oppose it or just continued to ignore the birth control issue?
That’s right and McCain likes children, whereas Obama eats them. And Obama likes to kick puppies! McCain is all about rights, where as Obama wants to bring back slavery!
Funny to hear about free speech and human rights from a Bush supporter.
Bush has done more to protect free speech and human rights than any Democratic president since FDR.
You have got to be kidding.
YEE Haw! The funny Evil Pundit is back!!
Of course Bush wants people to speak freely … if we don’t then all those illegal wire taps aren’t going to be any use.
At least McCain doesn’t think the issue is ‘above his pay grade’.
Obama can’t even think about it until he gets a raise. Lol!!
It’s nice to be flippant but for some of us who are on birth control for medical reasons it’s not so funny to hear a presidential candidate say that he doesn’t believe insurance should cover it. Anyone who supported Hillary should know full well that John McCain is about as far from her political beliefs as you can get, to support him because she lost is pure spite and I though we ladies were better than that.
Nevertheless, many do, because:
(1) Obama is arrogant and would be a terrible president
(2) Obama’s negatives are huge and he may lose the election
(3) Obama won the primaries by using fraud and slander
(4) They hope to have Hillary as president in 2012
It is interesting that men, who are too old to responsibly bring children into the world because they will most likely die befor the child is an adult can get their Viagra paid for by insurance, yet women of regular child bearing years are denied the right to manage their bodies as they see fit. Looks like a little male domination in my book.
What about the babies in the womb? They are denied the right to manage their lives as they see fit.
When are they babes? Can you prove it? And isn’t it God’s perogative to sort it out?
If you are on birth control there ARE no babies in the womb. Many women are on birth control for reasons that have nothing to do with getting or not getting pregnant. Saying that birth control shouldn’t be covered by your health insurance means women will now have to pay that out of their own pockets, this is blatently sexist.
That question is above my pay grade, CF.
I just love how he wants to withhold the tools women need to avoid even the possibility of an abortion being considered.
You don’t want kids having abortions? TEACH them how to avoid it. He voted against any kind of rules on abstinence education. “Let’s not make it scientific, let’s just tell the kids they will burn in hell for doing what is on TV … that should solve the problem!”
If you want people to stop doing something (like abortion) give them a better option (like birth control)
No woman wants to kill babies. Sometimes they feel trapped by circumstances and don’t think they have options. God forbid your tax dollars help them after you force them to have that baby though right?
New gov’t plan: Leave no child a dime.
Calling it ‘women’s rights’ makes it sound much less debatable than ‘abortion’.
Biden brings some actual experience and credibility to the team.
Which just underscores Obama’s lack of same.
And your point is?
My point is that Obama has insufficient experience and credibility to be a president. His running mate is better qualified than he is himself.
With respect, answer me this question. Did you vote for George Bush in 2000?
No, though I would have if I was eligible to vote.
George Bush already had experience as a state governor, among other things.
Just curious. What gives someone the experience to be President? Who knows, I do recall VP Cheney being picked because he would “shore up” President Bush’s inexperience. What did their experience give them? Who knows, but whether you agree or disagree with this administration’s policies post- september 11th, you must admit that they made some critical mistakes in the actual execution of their decisions. While a Presidential candidate’s experience should be considered, when it comes right down to it, only being Presisent can give someone experience at being President, even then, it still might not work.
*passes out the burn cream*
He didn’t say experience *at being* president. He said experience *to be* president.
Of course the only way to have experience at doing something is to have done something, but that doesn’t mean that a fighter pilot cannot have the experience to be an astronaut. *loses faith in humanity*
So as far as experience goes, Obama has the same flaws as Bush?
^ = troll?
*just realized EP is younger than she is*
*is horrified*
Lol! Experience at being a Governor in a state where the Gov’s only job is to preside over a state legislature meets once every two years! That explains his constant vacations…
That’s still more than Obama-lama-ding-dong ever did.
No, Obama has life experience, Bush just lived with a silver spoon in his hand.
“Life experience”? Going to a private school, then a rich man’s university, and then straight into the corrupt Chicago political machine?
That isn’t life experience. That’s Affirmative Action.
Which publican are you currently talking about now?
That’s Obama’s life experience. He never had to make any effort, he was lifted along all the way.
He’s never even fought an election before. All of Obama’s previous contests had his opponent removed by legal machinations before voting day.
Barack is an empty suit, and it shows.
No black man could get into Harvard on merit huh EP?
Like Bush got into Yale based on his grades?
clearly he lost that election
Yeah, all that intelligence and goodwill means nothing. The man’s clearly running on melanin. Why not just put Jesse Jackson up there? *eyeroll*
Considering that Obama spent 20 years soaking up racism in Jeremiah Wright’s church, he might as well be Jesse Jackson. I doubt he has any goodwill toweard the people who Wright blames for “creating AIDS to wipe out blacks”.
Is there any evidence that Mr Obama agreed / agrees with those sentiments?
There is the fact that Obama regards Wright as his mentor, and took the title of his book, ‘The Audacity of hope’, from one of the preacher’s speeches. And the fact that Obama was married by the man, attended his church for 20 years with his family, and donated $20,000 to it.
Seems a pretty close relationship for someone who rejects a philosophy. He could have gone to one of the many other churches in the area if he’d disagreed.
I rather like Obama, but how can you guys think he’ll win? You had a relatively solid candidate in Kerry, and he lost to the goddamn shrub. What’s changed since then? Did some of you move out of New York and California into the swing-states?
Kerry? Solid candidate? Riiiiiiight.
Well, Kerry was a complete doofus. But he was a solid candidate, compared to Obama.
Maybe McCain will haz Ur Baby?
Kerry’s mistake was in NOT countering the smear campaigns early enough. He tried to take the high road and it backfired. Obama is refuting the lies that McCain’s campaign is spreading. Hopefully he will stop complimenting his opponent and start laying down some of the negative FACTS about McCain to help counter the lies against Obama
It’s not facts against one person because you’re against them and then lies against someone because your for them. Generally, historical documentation is key – and there is historical documentation on both sides of the line. Bad things will be dug up about any presidential candidate, and a lot of bad things will be true, considering presidential candidates will have a political background. So, if you don’t want your reputation smeared on a national level, don’t run for president. Easy as that.
Actually there is some pretty extensive documentation that McCain ads are running lies. The tax ads are particularly full of them.
So, these “lies” — are they the words of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden in McCain’s ads? Because you’re calling your own team liars.
Nope, those are comments they made.
The lies are that Obama is going to raise taxes on families making more than 42,000 a year.
He is going to raise taxes on SINGLE people making more than 42,000 a year ADJUSTED Now factor in the deductibles and all that good stuff and that is like 75k a year pre tax. The tax increase on this $75,000 a year SINGLE person would go up about $15 a year. If you start taking in head of household and child credits a single mother would have to make over 90k before her taxes saw any increase at all. A family of 4 would have to make over $250k a year before any increase in taxes.
McCain’s ad’s show distressed families worrying over taxes, single mothers clutching children worrying over tax increases of under $100 a year when they are banking close to 6 figures? Get real.
There are some blatant lies in these ads too, not just pictures. One spanish language ad actually said working families making over $32,000 a year would pay higher taxes.
Obama wants the rich people to pay higher taxes, not the middle class. McCain wants us all to pay higher taxes so he can give another 4billion in tax relief to companies that ship jobs over seas.
What kind of scum bag does that?
Solid man, SOLID !!
Signed,
Link
Kind of off topic, but his friend there is hot in a 70′s geek way.
Apparently Obama went to school with the dude who played Salami on “The White Shadow”.
Speaking of nostalgia … click my name for a picture of Barry’s friends from the 60s.
Eh, at least he never sold out his friends to the VC.
You can lie all you like about McCain — but the truth about Obama’s friends remains.
Link under my name.
Hey, just because you’re lying about Obama doesn’t mean I’m lying about McCain. But I’ll extend the same “courtesy”… feel free to continue your transparent campaign of lies against Obama.
heh…. Obamabots will say anything.
Wow, that’s a whole new level of “got nothing.”
“I’m rubber, you’re glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!”
About the level of discourse I’d expect from conservatives. Carry on…
Everything you’ve said about McCain has been a lie. The points I’ve raised about Obama are documented and true.
That’s the difference in our discourse.
I love that zealot’s certainty you display. Don’t ever change that.
I love the way you simply ignore the facts.
They’re linked under my name.
So you have a monopoly on truth? Interesting. Do go on.
I don’t have a monopoly on truth, no. But I am telling the truth about Obama, and this is easily verified. Obama worked closely with Bill Ayers, who is an unrepentant terrorist. This is simple fact.
Whereas your claim that “McCain sold out his friends to the VC” is just a lie.
Your article is nothing but more froth from pajamas media, Michelle Malkin’s merry band of lunatics. I wouldn’t trust them to tell me the correct time, much less present an unbiased POV on an opposition politician.
As for the “war hero” McCain, I’ll direct you here:
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_mccain_lost_five_u.htm
Oh wow, McCain told them his ship’s name. Big freaking deal.
But Obama is closely allied with an unrepentant terrorist. Obama’s friendd and business associate, Bill Ayers, bombed the Pentagon. In 2001, Ayers said he had no regrets, and wished he had committed more terrorist acts.
That’s the kind of person Obama works with. Jeremiah Wright the racist, Tony Rezko the crook, Bill Ayers the terrorist. All closely tied to Obama over decades.
These are proven facts. You can google all the names and find the truth.
Ayers is a snore, the Rezko thing is murky at best, and
Wright is old news. I’m not at all convinced on the first two,
and I’m certainly not going to change my opinion of Obama
based on Wright’s views. (Which aren’t all that severe, for
all the fuss your side and the Hillarites spewed over it.)
Wright basically claimed that the USA had done un-Christian things and deserved to take some heat for it. He’s also of the opinion that black people are still subject to racism, and he’s pissed about it enough to respond in kind. Fair enough, accountability and all that, and he’s entitled to his view. It sure beats the pollyanna view that we’re always right and can do no wrong. And did I mention, it’s old news.
If that’s all you’ve got, prepare for Obama to administer a
severe beatdown on your boy Johnny this November.
Of course a fanatical leftist like you won’t be concerned by all the radical extremists in Obama’s orbit.
But I think most Americans will be worried as they learn more.
Assessment fail. I’m an independent; I vote for the party and candidate I feel are best qualified on a per-election basis. The Republicans have failed me and sold out the country; they’ve forfeited my vote, at least for this contest. More than that, Obama is charismatic, young, and has good ideas. His opponent has none of these qualities, and thinks the current administration has the right idea. Sorry, but no. Not this go-round, check back in four years.
Ah yes, the old pretend-to-be-independent trick.
It only works when you don’t singlemindedly support one side.
Think what you like. (As if anyone could stop you.)
Obama just put out an ad trying to defend his relationship with the terrorist Bill Ayers.
Can you smell the panic yet?
Isn’t unrepentant terrorist a redundancy?
The only panic is smell is coming from you, bot.
No, because a etrrorist can repent by admitting that he was wrong, apologising and trying to make up for his crimes. Ayers is unrepentant, since he has said he has no regrets and wished he’d planted more bombs.
As for panic, Obama is trying to use legal means to shut down an ad that explains the truth about Ayers. He’s running scared. Click my name for details.
Boring troll is boring.
OK, I have had enough… not that it will make any difference, but I will at least throw in my two cents worth. First and foremost… I will not sit back and second guess any american service member who has been a POW unless I am placed on a board that is specifically designed to look at the events surrounding that service member’s status as a POW. ANYONE who thinks that they can question a former POW without access to all information is WRONG. Second, knock off the bullshit about how Barak Obama is or supports terrorists. HE IS NOT and HE DOES NOT. You want to get shitty, I guarrentee I can connect ANY american Preisident to Terrorism using select “facts”. GET REAL people, this is not a game… if you oppose a candidate, do so with some level of maturity and reality. I may be a pain in the ass, but as a career soldier turned teacher I can’t help myself…It is a perfect fit, because I do teach 14-15 year olds.
But… but… why isn’t Fox News airing the attacking ads?!? I thought they were Yay Republicans, Die Democrats… I can’t believe I was wrong this one time… *sigh*
Obama may not be a terrorist, but he has worked together closely with a terrorist. He made his bed and he’ll have to lie in it.
Also disturbing is the fact that Obama is trying to shut down the free speech of the group that’s pointing this out. Obama has no respect for human rightts.
Deeming anyone who’s ever “worked closely with a terrorist” unfit for office seems like a rather serious FAIL in the get-them-talking-rather-than-bombing department, doesn’t it? You could write off more or less every member of both English and Irish Parliaments at that rate.
Hyperbole, OK!?
Less hyperbolically: refusing office to anyone who’d worked closely with a terrorist would drastically reduce the terrorism-abatement capacity of both Parliaments.
Dealing with terrorists, try President, “He is the new right hand of God” Reagan (Iran-Contra, Saddam, Comandante Cero, just to name a few) and George HW Bush (Saddam until he didn’t do as he was told, Noriega, until he didn’t do as he was told).
Consider Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers’ wife and the co-host of Obama’s career-launching fundraiser. When she was in the Weather Underground she was one of those members typically fascinated with Charles Manson (I discuss this briefly in my book). Speaking of Manson’s famous murders she exclaimed, “Dig It! First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach! Wild!” In appreciation, her Weather Underground cell made a threefingered “fork” gesture its official salute.
Ah, nuts. I was enjoying the Funny Pundit – bot until he agreed that Obama wasn’t a terrorist. I like him better when he runs his absolutes program – the justuposition with reality is hilarious!
I’m an independent. I’m voting for Obama beacause I think 4 more years of a republican president will probably lead us to WWIII, not to mention the population of the US being further stripped of its rights.
Also would like to note: Obama wouldn’t have even been a candidate if he was as horrible as he’s made out to be by certain blind right-wing folks….
*cough*
Bush wouldn’t be president if he’s as horrible as he’s being made out by some blind left-wing folks.
EP, where is that exceprt from about Ayers wife?
It’s from Jonah Goldberg. Link under my name.
Jonah Goldberg!!???!! THERE’s some credibility!
ANd the funny Pundit strikes again! Keep running this program; it’s what we tune in to see!
I’m pleased to help my adoring fans.
There’s another trove of Obama-Ayers links for you under my name now.
Been watching the polls, by any chance? There’s some amusement!
I’ve always thought that to be one of the least catchy children’s rhymes/phrases.
What are you talking about?! That one was classic when I was growing up! Right along with the game of Flinch, which was always in play whether you wanted it to be or not.
Didn’t anyone ever tell Barry that ya don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows?
I think it was just the popular style at the time, just like mullets.
We need a new hairstyle for the 21st century — the AFROMULLET!
I’m sure dagerotypes of McCain from when he was a young man look just as silly as this snapshot of Obama.
No he just looks like your typical white person.
McCain probably had a typical white teenager hairstyle in 1957, which probably looks just as silly today as Obama’s typical black teenager hairstyle from 1981.
My brother-in-law had a large fro in 1972 which was in a different league from these guys. He had red hair and freckles, so he had the Ronald McDonald look.
Every adult was once a teenager. Teenagers following current fashions look silly, teenagers from decades ago look far sillier, because of the double whammy of looking like a teenager, and doing it in the fashion of decades ago.
I’m voting based on the men they are today. I choose the well spoken, computer literate, professor of constitutional law.
I don’t know, I think Emo teens are possibly the most ridiculous fashion trend I’ve ever seen. I can’t wait till their kids drag those photos out.
Thanks for explaining it all to us. I am so glad you cleared that up.
WARNING: MCCAIN IS OLD AHEAD
Yeah, with his buckle-hat and pitchfork? Except it would have to be a painting, being way back then and all.
*giggles* I enjoyed that fresh presentation of McCain is old.
Probably have to be cave art…
Ha!
It’s racist because it calls attention to the fact that the black man in the photo is, inded black.
OMG!
RACISTS!
Someone called Obama BLACK!
BLACK!? I thought he was a n*shot*.
The picture = AWESOME.
Obama with a ‘fro = SEXY.
The pun = CUTE.
Everyone flailing “omg, he has the “bad hair,” now I can’t vote for his nappy ass” = RACIST.
Nobody is saying that Obama has bad hair. You’re hallucinating.
Has anyone seen EP since those 3 guys were arrested for a “plot” against Obama?
I am guessing he was the one in the middle.
is it me or does youg obama look like nick cannon and his friend looks like harry potter? Also, the girl in front of them looks like Ms. Swan from madtv
Picture taken at Occidental College. Hubby was in Sciences track, so he never saw Mr. O…