Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Vote Obama

Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

Vote Obama He can conjure fire

(Barack & Michelle Obama)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: OJ

» Recaption This

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 277 comments

  1. twist says:

    No, no, it’s just smoldering a bit.

  2. Slashydutchie says:

    In Holland we picked a dude that looked like Harry Potter… didn’t work out that well.

  3. fred says:

    No thanks, I have matches.

  4. John U. Seed says:

    Nope, I will not vote for Obama. He betrayed us on the telecom immunity deal for an $11 million campaign contribution from the telecom companies. I will vote for Nader and urge everybody else to do the same.

  5. ema says:

    Poor man, I believe he really thinks he can.

    • Charlie Foxtrot says:

      But ema, Trust me…he really can. BTW I am glad that you are back!

    • OJ says:

      Meh, I didn’t thought this was one of the worst ones I’ve made. Most of the other, better ones didn’t even get picked. :(

      Having said that, I think both of the major party candidates have serious flaws in their policy that need to be modified.

      Our country is in a rough economic time, with $9.6 trillion in national debt. How will Obama pay for each family to receive a $1000 energy rebate? How will McCain fund a war that 64% of Americans oppose? I like both candidates, but each of them needs to re-evaluate the costs of their propositions. There’s only so long we can spend pretend money before it comes back to bite us in the rear.

  6. ryszard says:

    Wowzer . . . now, if he’d only finished his second year at Hogwarts . . .

    (Hi, ema!!!)

  7. God complex. He haz it.

  8. Rachel of Cyberia says:

    He puts on his robe and wizard hat…

  9. MegaBob says:

    First the Collider, now an Obama LOL ? OMG, the end of the world is here !

  10. MegaBob says:

    Obama was in Texas talking to some school children. Thinking of the upcoming election, he asked the kids to give an example of a “Tragedy”. One child said his dad wrecked their new truck. Obama said ” NO; that’s an accident-not a tragedy.
    The next kid said that his uncle lost his wallet full of money. Obama said ” No- that’s a loss, not a tragedy. The third kid said ” If you in your plane got hit by a missile over Texas and blew up!”. Obama says” Yes; that would be a tragedy! But why did you say that?”.
    The kid answers ” Well- it wouldn’t be an accident and it sure wouldn’t be a loss !”

  11. eddiepscetti says:

    I’ll bet he wishes he could conjur a wayback machine so he could rethink his latest comment. While it may not have come across as he intended, I’m sure he would gladly rewind his clock 24 hours and rethink the ‘lipstick’ comment.

    • n8 says:

      “Lipstick on a pig” is a not uncommon phrase. Heck, it was used in a superbowl ad a few years back, and there were no implications of misogyny. I like Obama’s response to the “furor” over this.

      ====

      “Enough,” Obama declared. “I don’t care what they say about me. But I love this country too much to let them take over another election with lies and phony outrage and Swift Boat politics. Enough is enough.”

      “We’ve got an energy crisis,” Obama said at a campaign event where he had planned to focus entirely on education policy. “We have an education system that is not working for too many of our children and making us less competitive. We have an economy that is creating hardship for families all across America. We’ve got two wars going on, veterans coming home not being cared for — and this is what they want to talk about.

      “You know who ends up losing at the end of the day? It’s not the Democratic candidate. It’s not the Republican candidate. It’s you, the American people. Because then we go another year, or another four years or another eight years without addressing the issues that matter to you.”

      • MegaBob says:

        “HOPE! CHANGE! LIPSTICK ON A PIG!” will go down in history…..

      • eddiepscetti says:

        n8, I wasn’t slamming Obama for it. I was simply saying I bet he wishes he could go back in time and not have made the reference. I mean seriously, I know what he meant by it as I’m sure most intelligent people do as well. But you have to admit that given the tone of the campaign on both sides, it wasn’t one of his smartest moves.

        • n8 says:

          I think the problem here is that Obama behaves as a mature adult and expects the same from others. That’s just not going to happen when the other side is employing a kitchen-sink strategy. This election has all the gravitas of a schoolyard “yo mama” throw-down, and it’s depressing as hell.

          • ema says:

            It’s all part of winning an election, if he can’t handle it he should go back to community organizing. Look at what they are doing to Sarah Palin, she isn’t making the same kind of remarks about Obama’s person.

            • MegaBob says:

              Personally, I’d like to see more jokes on here- either party. It’s not as depressing as listening to the insults and whining. Lighten up, folks !

            • n8 says:

              Palin can be legitimately attacked on the issues. That whole “if he can’t handle it” shtick is BS; the Republicans should have more pride in themselves and respect for our country’s democracy than to act like bratty schoolchildren. As for community organizing, yeah, screw him for trying to make a difference in his community! What a loser thing to do. :-/

              • ema says:

                How is underhandedly calling her a pig attacking her on the issues?

                • ck says:

                  You must not fit into eddiepscetti’s definition of “most intelligent people”, huh?

                • n8 says:

                  He wasn’t underhandedly calling her a pig. He was using a common turn of phrase which translates to “make a bad idea look attractive”, and that’s all it was. The McCain campaign is twisting his words to look like a personal attack, and you’re buying it. I would implore you not to.

                  • ema says:

                    Oh, how convenient!! If he didn’t mean it as an attack he at the very least should have reconsidered using that phrase knowing how so soon after Palin’s acceptance speech it would be miscontrued. How could he be so stupid when there is a campaign to be won! I don’t believe he is stupid at all.

                    • eddiepscetti says:

                      ema, n8 is right. If you read it in context, there really isn’t any reference to Palin at all. You know that you and I probably agree on a lot of the issues, but seriously, don’t buy into this one. It won’t be worth the fight trying to defend McCain’s side because there really isn’t an issue. Now I agree that it wasn’t very smart on Obama’s part to make the reference, but it wasn’t meant as a personal attack.

                      • ema says:

                        I don’t happen to agree with you here, the pitbull and lipstick phrase is probably the most talked about phrase from Palin’s acceptance speech and he used it against her. He and his advisors are to smart to accidently put this in at this time.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          Part of the problem for me, since I live overseas, I have to rely a lot on the MSM for everything happening in the States. I didn’t really know about the lipstick/pitbull thing, I only know that from what I read Obama’s comment was taken out of context. Maybe it was a reference to Palin’s comment in her speech, but on the surface it just doesn’t translate that way.

                        • Jane St.Clair says:

                          Well, and McCain used the lipstick on a pig comment several times, once when he was describing Hillary Clinton’s health care plan. Sarah Palin does not hold copyright over the word lipstick just because she used it in a speech once.

                        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                          Glad we agree. :D

                        • truthtalker says:

                          The comment is one of two things:
                          1: a backhanded attack on Palin, as many people assume. Even the people there started laughing during the delivery “You can put lipstick on a pig” (pause, laughter begins, then he continues)
                          or
                          2: a striking example of poor decision making on the part of him or his speech writers. There are several other similar metaphors he could’ve chosen without drawing (accidentally or not) on the very highly played pitbull/lipstick comments. A major faux pas that should have been easily avoided.
                          -
                          Either way – is that something befitting a president?

                        • herb says:

                          Boy, it’s a good thing that the Repubs have used that phrase in referenc e to the Dems. That would just be tragic, what with the whining and victimization and all… it’d be terrible if someone where to look into the phrase and see if it’s ever been used before in politics.

                          Oh wait: it has. Link is in my name.

                        • fred says:

                          It’s the timing herb, the timing of it is not good.

                        • truthtalker says:

                          Seriously. Listen to the pause for effect. And anyway, I’m not saying which one it is. I’m just saying both possibilities are bad.

                        • herb says:

                          I can understand, tho’ listening to the speech it appeared more that he was trying to remember the full phrase and wait for the audience to quiet down so he can deliver the “punchline”. It didn’t seem like a calculated attack.

                        • lol says:

                          McCain has used the exact phrase three separate times when referring to Hillary and her health care policy. Is that something befitting for a president?

                        • fred says:

                          Trying to remember the full phrase?? It’s not that long, I hope he can hold more “words” in his brain than that.

                        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                          I hope to overcome that problem with the newest software update. I will have to recalibrate his ears though.

                        • truthtalker says:

                          lol. Cable works much better than sattelite – no weather interruptions. Though you do get more channels. ;D
                          -
                          In all seriousness, though, there’s nothing wrong with the phrase, and referring to Hillary’s policy is ok too (though aiming it at Hillary would be bad). The problem is all about timing. Obama (or his speech-writer) is not a great comedian. That was a classic example of “too soon”. Should have just gotten a different metaphor if he needed to make that kind of comparison right now. He did the fish one for McCain’s campaign, and it came off better, though it got tainted by the previous comment in many people’s eyes. Which again was because it was too close to the “insult” in question. A month from now he could probably have said that and gotten no reaction, but since ‘lipstick’ has become a large symbol for the conservative feminists at the moment, no one could make that kind of comment right now without people drawing that same connection to Palin.

                        • truthtalker says:

                          Pardon the typos. Typing fast gets me every time.

                        • truthtalker says:

                          Wow – never had WordPress randomly call me for “duplicate post” before. Especially when it’s the first time today I’ve tried to say “Pardon the Typos. Typing fast gets me every time.” O.o

                        • truthtalker says:

                          And then it posted it anyway *grumbles*

                        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                          And this makes Republicans look less childish or just stupid how? Getting butthurt over a phrase they have used over a half dozen times just makes them look like dumbasses. And playing the woman card just makes women look weak.

                          She did say she was a pitbull with lipstick but she can’t take somebody else using lipstick in a sentence. Sounds more like a yap dog to me. I call Toughness Fail.

                        • truthtalker says:

                          Wasn’t just Republicans that found it to be in bad taste. And not just women either. Again, the phrase isn’t the problem, it’s the timing – both when it was used and how it was delivered. To those that believe it was an attack, it made Obama look like a small person. To those who feel it was a poor choice of words it looks like Obama needs to fire his speechwriter at the least and shows poor judgement (an important characteristic to not be ‘poor’ in a leader) at the worst.
                          I’ve not heard Palin complain about it at all. Mostly various news sources and McCain’s people (though not Palin herself. She probably doesn’t care.)

                        • Charlie Foxtrot says:

                          The phrase is just perfect. The problem with the GOP is they want it both ways. Palin wants to play tough (the diff bet a H-mom and a pit bull is lipstick), yet don’t call me names (lipstick & a pig) even though he wasn’t. Obviously, she isn’t capable of playing in the big leagues. IF the GOP had a real plan, they wouldn’t need to fabricate non-issues.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          That was point as well. I don’t think it was meant as a slam at Palin and I think the GOP should have just let it pass. In all probability, it may have caused a stir, but the GOP would have come out on top for ignoring it.

                        • ck says:

                          The GOP is going to ride the waaaaaahmbulance all the way to Novermber.

                        • MegaBob says:

                          And after November when McCain’s won- tis the Democrats riding the Waaambulance with Gore, Kerry and Dukakis in it !

                        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                          Still doesn’t change the simple fact that McCain’s own people are saying WTF over the stir being caused. Doesn’t change the fact that he was talking about making a bad situation look good. Didn’t mention Palin.

                          Any inference came from the people inferring, not from him. Pause or no pause.

                • markmier says:

                  It seems to me that she is the lipstick. McCain is the pig.

                • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                  How about the fact that it is a phrase long used to refer to people trying to whitewash an issue to make it look pretty when it is still what it is. Nothing to do with Palin. Saying lipstick does not imply Palin. She doesn’t own the word.

                  • herb says:

                    But- but- but- she referred to herself as a pitbull with lipstick! See? Any time there’s a reference anywhere to any non-human wearing lipstick, it is automatically an insult against Palin. Unless a Republican said it.

                    • DeathWyrmNexus says:

                      Now I just want to wear an “I’m with Stupid” t-shirt to a Republican gathering and just stand by people who are offended by that.

                      • Kurt says:

                        See if you can get your pic taken with McCain while wearing that. Wear a windbreaker over said shirt, and when you’re beside him for the photo, open the jacket.

                  • wundawomun says:

                    Yeah just like Paris Hilton doesn’t own the word hot! How long before she got on tv were people saying that? That really bugged me. Sorry….

            • eddiepscetti says:

              I’m a registered Republican and as such will probaby vote Republican. But seriously, when I first heard about this I thought, “Oh man, here we go..” But when I read it in context, it’s clear that it wasn’t directed at Palin. And truthfully, I really really wish McCain’s campaign had not even said a word about it. It would have made them look a whole let better. The fact remains, Obama said it but I can imagine we wishes he hadn’t. Not that there was anything wrong with it, but he should have known it would be taken out of context.

              • Kurt says:

                HA!! you said Probably vote republican, our efforts are gradually swaying you over to the blue side.

                • eddiepscetti says:

                  No, I’ve tasted the kool-aid and went GAH!!

                  • n8 says:

                    Kool-aid aside, even though your natural political home is the Republican party, I would encourage you to consider giving them a time-out for four years, at least. They haven’t executed their duties faithfully nor well over the past eight years, and giving them another term will only reinforce the idea that poor performance is permissible so long as the right words are mouthed at speech time.

                    • eddiepscetti says:

                      You’re referring to Bush, right? I don’t disagree that Bush has been worse then mediocre, but the fact is, a lot of what has been going in the country is the result of a Democratically controlled Congress. While Bush has mishandled several key issues (i.e. War in Iraq, the Economy, Foreign Policy to name a few) Congress, led by the Democrats, hasn’t done much better. The polls show that on average, Congress is right around 55% in the negative (a bit higher in some areas, a bit lower in others.) It’s the issues that I think really matter is where Congress has gone off the rails. I’ll be honest and say that I’m just not overwhelmed by Obama. Neither am I by McCain, but I see him as the lesser of two evils (despite his choice in VP). And frankly, I just plain don’t like Biden. Never have, never will. Also, I don’t necessarily agree that Palin was the best choice either. To put it the simplets terms possible, I just haven’t been happy with Politics du jour and while Obama is proclaiming “Change”, I just don’t see it happening for him.

                      (you can click on my name if your interested in what the polls show.)

                      • Luke says:

                        Speaking of mediocre, do you even have an opinion?

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          Hey Luke, reread the post, ok? I was replying to n8 as to why I won’t ‘switch’ sides. If you can’t understand, go back to school.

                        • Kurt says:

                          Not switching sides? Fine. No cookies for you :p
                          In all seriousness though, I don’t really consider myself to be a Democrat. I consider myself to be an independent who, lately, agrees with the Democrats on alot of issues. I think to blindly say you’re a dem or a rep is to sacrifice a small part of your ability to think for yourself.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          Yeah, do agree with you. However, I was only trying to clarify my party of registration. I still believe in voting my concience though. Maybe I’m a Republicrat?

                        • Kurt says:

                          That works. But you’re still not getting any cookies.

            • Char says:

              “Look at what they are doing to Sarah Palin, she isn’t making the same kind of remarks about Obama’s person.”

              Are you out of your mind? Did you not hear her speech at the RNC?

              “What does he actually seek to accomplish after he’s done turning back the waters and healing the planet?”

              Lies, mud-slinging, distortion of facts, and pandering are all a part of winning an election, but they are still wrong and the fact is (and you can look at FactCheck.org to confirm this) that the Obama campaign has been running much cleaner than the McCain campaign (who, ironically, just referenced FactCheck in an attempt to mislead people).

              Obama does exaggerate and he has used the facts to his advantage. And that is wrong.

              But McCain has flat-out lied. Not cherry-picking facts to make Obama look bad. He’s explicitly saying things that AREN’T TRUE. And that’s far worse than anything out of the Obama Campaign.

          • eddiepscetti says:

            Yes, well.. the more things change, the more they stay the same. It would be nice, just once, in ANY campaign, if it was about issues and policies and not about what either one said. But hey, they’re human too.. it’s a natural defensive reaction to go for the personal attacks.

            • ema says:

              Yes, but the ones that give in and go for the personal attacks are the ones that are generally looked down on eventually and lose. The ones that can stick to the issues will always look better.

              • Charlie Foxtrot says:

                Exactly.. so I guess that you will be voting for Obama now, since the GOP has nothing but personal attacks, unless you count the made up responses to the made up “attacks” on the gov with such thick skin and lipstick… no wait, sorry, the lipstick was on her pitbull.

                • ck says:

                  McCain’s camp have been smearing and slandering this whole campaign. Their recent ads are simply embarrassing. It must be the only tactic they have, if they kept to the issues then McCain’s similarities to Bush would be even more obvious. No wonder Bush didn’t go to the RNC.

            • n8 says:

              Can’t disagree with you there. I was shocked to hear McCain declare that this election wasn’t about issues. My reaction: “Sorry pal, but that’s not up to you.”

            • herb says:

              So, I’ll tell ya what: you run on the Repub ticket and I’ll run on the Dem ticket and we will have civil discourse and debate, interrupted by periodic bouts between our respective VPs beating the shit out of each other in a steel cage.

              (I’m trying for that broad appeal)

        • MegaBob says:

          sota like “I voted for it before I voted against it”?

      • lol says:

        Look forward to 2 more months of Palin playing the victim card.

        • MegaBob says:

          And 2 more months of Obama playing the Race card?

        • ema says:

          Obama just needs to stay at home and take care of his family. He has two young girls that need him at home! WAAAAA!!

          • ck says:

            Neither of his children require the special attention needed for Down’s syndrome or pregnancy. Fail!

            • ema says:

              I was being semi-sarcastic there.

              • herb says:

                I would just like to underscore (not to beat on you too much, ema) but not only are neither of the Obama girls special needs, but neither is an infant -and- neither is being denied the presence of Mom at that crucial juncture.

                • truthtalker says:

                  While we’re doing the serious side notes, there’s a couple things that I find borderline offensive about the way this argument comes up. One is that the kids have a dad, too, and not acknowledging that kinda makes it seem like people think fathers are all dead-beat dads that can’t care for kids. The other is that special needs children are not ‘fragile eggs’ that require constant fawning attention by one or both parents. Yes, they can be a bit more work, but nothing insurmountable, especially since with Palin’s case, dad’s gonna be with the kids full time. And the older the kids get, the more they can help out too. Even 3 and 4 year olds can do some simple house chores usually, which can help pick up some of the slack when the baby’s needing more attention. And it lets them be involved in their family and help, which kids usually love to do.

                  • herb says:

                    In a perfect society, the mother needs to be there for the child during the first year. Paternal involvement is almost as important but, as someone pointed out else-LOL, men don’t (usually) lactate. Breastfeeding is the single most important act a mother can do for her child (and her own health — my wife lost 40 lbs in a month). I could go on about the attachment needs between mother and child, but I’m sure people are quite capable of reading the La Leche League’s website.

                    I have no problem with a politically-ambitious woman running for office. The problem I have with Palin in this regard is how she was willing to leave her child after 3 days (neverminding the risk of her pelvic floor collapsing) and now hitting the campaign trail when Trig is only 5 mos.

                    Mr. Palin’s involvement with his kids is fine. He has my kudos. In the end, though, fathers are not mothers.

      • jellybeans says:

        McCain used the same phrase when talking about Hilary’s health care plan and Cheny used it when talking about Kerry. Obama is not the first to use that VERY common phrase and he will not be the last.
        The false outrage is hysterical though.
        Keep it up Pugs, the press is starting to turn on you, pretty soon they will actually talk about the Palin/McCain (let’s face it, she is top of the ticket) lies and then lets watch those numbers fall.

    • Charlie Foxtrot says:

      Come on, Eddie, don’t tell me that you are about to drink the kool-aid, it might be green, but that only works for M&M’s.

  12. MegaBob says:

    That is one SCARY picture of Michelle Obama in the ad here “Likely to cheat”.
    Give me the Borg queen any day.

  13. Jessica W. says:

    Barack Hussein Obama, President of The United States of Hell.

  14. Marshy says:

    Well, Obama isn’t perfect, but I like him better than McCain. McCain is okay, but he’s too conservative. And his VP pick, Palin, is kind of nuts.

  15. MegaBob says:

    McCain and Obama were getting their hair cut at the Capital barber shop. Neither spoke to each other. Obama finished first and the barber offered him some spray on cologne. ” No thanks! I don’t want my wife thinking I’ve been in a brothel !”.
    When McCain was offered the same cologne, he said ” Go ahead !
    MY wife doesn’t know what the inside of a brothel smells like !”.
    (rimshot)
    Heard this on the radio and almost wrecked I was laughing so hard.
    Now , please enter your own GOOD jokes- McCain or Obama !

  16. Totema1 says:

    There are some who call me…Tim. But they’re wrong, it’s Barack.

  17. Dexaan says:

    Call me when he can cast Magic Missile.

    • Kurt says:

      At the darkness even.

      • truthtalker says:

        Heh – here we go again. ;D

        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

          I always have to bite my tongue lest I reveal how much of a dork I really am. Technically the darkness isn’t a creature and thus can’t be targeted by Magic Missile. So while the joke is funny, the reference is fail and usually causes eyerolling every time it is brought up the minute magic is brought up as we hear every single time like clockwork.

          Damn, forgot to bite my tongue. … Ow…

  18. Charlie Foxtrot says:

    LAST!!!

  19. Kevin says:

    There are some who call me….
    Barack

  20. Questioning the American Bolshevik views
    1. Is wealth redistribution taking money from stockholders and redistributing it to those who don’t pay taxes?
    2. Is it more important to make sure that illegal votes are not disenfranchised or making sure that groups like ACORN do not nullify honest votes.
    3. Would premature U.S. withdrawal from Iraq grand jihadists a victory and make all of our accomplishments, money spent and lives lost a big waist?
    4. Can this country afford to grant socialist Democrats total control of the government and allow them to sacrifice our safety by cutting the military budget by 25%?
    Now comes the big question. How do we stop socialism from ruining our lives?
    The answer is simple. Don’t vote American Bolsheviks into power and boycott the socialist propaganda media into bankruptcy.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjvBEKrGkDI
    Cybercorrespondent

  21. cgray says:

    Affimative Action Boy better stay far away from those flames. He hasn’t got the sense to piss on himself if his pants were on fire. Maybe Michelle could whip hers out and help.

  22. Gucci Shop says:

    Your aritcle is very helpful for me,good job!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up