she’s not the vp that you’re looking for
(Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Someone opened | Cindy McCain nude Next »
she’s not the vp that you’re looking for
(Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
Ok, this one just doesn’t make sense.
in star wars, a jedi uses the force on a storm trooper, and hes all: “these are not the people you are looking for”
so… yeah
It was ‘Droids’…
Oh, I understood the reference, but why would he be saying that about the opposing VP nominee? Unless he’s talking about Biden, which would then make a lot of sense..
tru dat!
Um, he is telling people not to vote for Sarah, chief. Least that is what I got out of it.
Ok, I’ll buy that.. I obviously had my other goggles on..
It’s okay, I usually sexualize Palin so I can tolerate her. I’m not proud of it but at least I can admit that I can’t stand her otherwise and sink to depraved means not to get angry at the sight of her.
Yeah. So is Joe Biden a girl?
I don’t want to see Biden in lipstick
Ouch. I can haz brain scrub, please?
He’d still look better than Giuliani, I’d wager…
National Crossdressing Day in Washington…
*eyebleach*
Rove in a thong.
Oh dear God. LOL Try getting THAT picture out of your head. :::shudder:::
Dark Lord of the Sith.
Thanks for clearing that up for me Yum Yum.
That’s racist.. He prefers Sith Lord of Color…
African-Sithican?
exactly
I think Sith-American is more accurate.
*high five*
You wish!
Have you seen the latest polls? Palin is failin’, hard. McCain isn’t even using her NAME in his ads anymore, she’s become that much of a drag on the ticket. The Republicans badly underestimated the intelligence of the American people by choosing her, and now that Americans have figured out exactly what Palin is, she is worse than useless to them. This election is already in the bag for us Democrats.
You are so grumpy today.
Huh? Have YOU seen the polls since she was put on the ticket? They’ve gone UP, not down.
Not for long, we just have to use simple talk so that the soccer moms who don’t have an edumacation to stop clinging to guns and religion and understand that she is another Bush we cannot afford, and she wants to set back women’s rights 50 years. Very soon the short bus will again be making that left turn, just as soon as the dems can churn out their edition of “Fascism for Dummies”.
“Tomorrow’s fascists will call themselves anti-fascists.” — Winston Churchill.
Looks like he was right.
Sounds about right, those who back Israel no matter what and back invading countries often do so under the pretence of fighting anti-semitism or “Islamofacists.”
Actually the national poll of polls this afternoon show Obama up by 3 points which is one more point than where we were at just before the conventions.
The Palin pick shows the lack of judgement that McCain has. It goes against all he has said this last year about what a VP should have for qualifications.
We still have debates to get to.
Oh my. You will be in for a rude shock then, Ema. Biden is a seasoned warrior, Palin is a grade school debater. Biden will eat Palin for lunch, it will be an absolute disgrace for you guys.
LOL. You’re in for a nasty shock.
Yes, for the spin will be “Biden’s such a misogynistic meanie, intellectually demolishing cute lil’ Sarah Barracuda like that. Has he no class?”, thus completely derailing any actual substance that had been in the debate…
I fear that you are correct. Either way it’s a loss for the Demos in any VP debate unless Biden pulls his punches.
I think that Biden is smart enough to adjust his game to be just enough above Palin to not look like a bully.
I can’t wait Seth.
Just gotta say, I saw some of your replies in the God thread, but they were at no-nest level. Suddenly I don’t feel like taunting you anymore. Way to go and ruin things for me by being cool and smart and spiritual AND Republican. I guess there really ARE miracles
WHAAAA???
I’m glad we can agree on some things!
You’re just lovable. XD
Thanks! You are too.
And from this side of the aisle, you’re great!!
Anyway, back to the topic at hand and enough of this *love fest* (j/k) While I truly do not like Biden, I have a horrible feeling that in fact he will rip Palin a new one. The only reason I believe that is because he does have years on committees in argumentative situations.
I agree, I am worried that Palin will stink it up. I will be rooting for her though. I would not be out of the question for Biden to stick his foot in his mouth once or twice. He does have that reputation, for example, saying Hillary may have been the better choice for VP. If I were a worshipper of the Obamanator, I would be a bit worried. Not as worried as a Palin supporter, but worried still.
He won’t be allowed to ‘rip her a new one’. If he does, could you imagine the backlash? Seasoned old Washington dude rips precious Palin to pieces. There’s one thing with respectable debating, but if he goes for any low blows, or says _anything_ that can be construed as a gender-based attack (which can be quite easy, considering the number of euphemisms in our culture) and it’ll be a huge blow to the Democratic ticket.
Especially after the lipstick nonsense that is still giving me cancer with nobody to sue over it so my family won’t be able to eat after I die from it. Bastards…
It was this comment: “Why is that? We could just be living inside the process of creation, we could also be active participants. If it is true that God is in us and we are in God as the bible says why would that be so far fetched?”
–
To me, it demonstrated that you have real spirituality, which I respect, rather than organized religion, which I tend not to. It seems like you’ve thought things through for yourself, rather than just heard what some preacher said, or read a book and went, “Eh, good enough for me.”
Well, thank you Seth! I’m glad you liked that statement. That’s a very nice compliment, I appreciate it.
Yes, we like ema. She is spunky, can argue her point well, and is a good human being.
I somehow missed this God discussion (been ill, and now busy) but ah well.
Not really, remember the Gore-Bush debates, Gore crushed Bush, but people were expecting Bush to be such a bumbling idiot that when he was only a simpering fool the “liberal press” convinced the country that he didn’t do THAT bad. In this case, Palin will most likely perform somewhat above moron level, then whine that everyone is picking on her.
Yeah, and Biden will make her cry just like he made Mrs Alito cry in the Senate hearings.
Sarah Palin will rip Biden to shreds.
Bwahahahahaha!
Nah. He’ll make sense, she’ll bs her way around the questions (such as they are from today’s media), and the vast majority of the people will love her because she’s purty.
“What a country!” Indeed.
You haven’t heard Biden speak much, have you?
Biden: 35 years of experience in the Senate, probably one of the sharpest tongues there is. Also, most likely, the most intelligent politician in the country. It’s the equivalent of the New England Patriots playing Stanford University.
Or the New England Patriots playing the New York Giants! Oh wait that didnt turn out so well for the Patriots. Me thinks you vastly under-estimate Palin and over-estimate Biden. How many times has Biden made WTF!-esque gaffs? How many years has he been a Senator? How many debates has he been in? I actually think Palin (who ran for both Mayor and Governor, both of which might have included debates) might have more experience then Biden in this.
In Alaska they don’t have debates, they pass around casseroles instead.
Damn, now I am hungry.
If McCain kicks the bucket Palin can get Biden to be her VP just like Obama and we’re good! She has as much foreign policy exp. as Obama does. Also, in case you didn’t know, there is no real consensus on what “The Bush Doctrine” actually means. It was just an attempt by Gibson to trap Palin, which didn’t work btw.
That was probably the stupidest response I’ve read on this thread. Of course there is no real cosensus on what the Bush Doctrine actually means, considering Bush is still attempting to figure out that one himself. Ema, did he trap Palin when he called BS on her bridge to nowhere claim and she sidestepped the question? Man, what partisan lowlife politics, eh? How sexist it is to question one’s lies in a time of political correctness!
Well, Tool, at least you admitted that the question from Gibson was at best flawed, at worst a trick question. Ema did not claim sexism, and never has. But you are too much a douchenozzle to pay attention. Ema’s point is not that Gibson is sexist, but he is biased. Not as biased as you, but then again, that is probably why he makes the big bucks.
Well if that is true Josh that Bush himself is still figuring out what “The Bush Doctrine” is, then why in the world would Gibson have used that question if it wasn’t to trap Palin? And tell me why anyone in their right mind would pay any attention to ANYTHING he ever had to say again, about anything?
I’m sorry, but calling her lie on the bridge to nowhere is a black and white question. Did you tell the truth or did you lie. It’s a known fact she lied through her teeth, and side-stepped the question. Democrat or Republican, she is unable to own up to her lies. Bill Clinton lied, and finally he owned up to it. Didn’t make it right either. That was my point, tool. I don’t hate her for her policies, I have a lot of republican friends, I just hate liars and people that defend her because she’s a woman. It’s politics, either deal with the heat or get out of the kitchen (and no, that wasn’t sexist).
Because she changed her mind about the bridge does not mean she lied. Are politicians allowed to change their minds?
Politicians are always allowed to change their mind, and I welcome it. It shows that they are able to think, learn and grow. There is a distinct difference between chaning your mind and lying, however. If she said “I was for the bridge, then after doing some thinking, soul searching, etc. realized that this was improper use of tax funds”, I would have whole-heartedly respected her. That is not what she did, she stated “Thanks but no thanks”. That was a LIE, no matter how you paint it. The truth is that she went against it when she knew congress was on a witch hunt over the bridge and she couldn’t get it approved, so to save face she turned against it. She was never always against it. Not to mention, she kept the $400 million already given to Alaska for the project and spent it elsewhere.
It’s politics, either deal with the heat or get out of the kitchen (and no, that wasn’t sexist).
The sexist version of that would have been “Deal with the heat or get INTO the kitchen I think”
And on the topic, did anyone else laugh their ass off at Rush playing the sexism card?
I didnt know that they taught parrots how to type, because you seem to use all of the Democratic talking points. The “Bush Doctrine” is G W Bush decisions, something that thankfully will end once he is out of office. Biden is so smart that he too voted for deregulation…but of course its not HIS fault (though it could be Bill Clintons, it was enacted 10 years ago).
You call Palin a liar but I see nothing to back that up. You call it sexist but ignore the fact that unlike Obama McCain chose someone from outside of Washington who is not beholden to anyone there and has actually gone against the system (much her own party) to actually make changes and reforms. To me Obama/Biden looks too much like Bush/Cheney. The new guy in Washington who offers “change” (Bush used that in his campain) who backed himself with a “veteran” and hasnt shown any capability to go against his own party (which will be needed).
I would rather hear my leader say “wow, things might get a little tougher, better start making better decisions” as McCain has then “GET YOU SHOOTING IRON TO HUNT SQUIRRELS BECAUSE WE ARE ALL DOOMED!!!!” while wearing doomsday robes and plaquard as Obama has. McCain has admitted that, gee, he isnt the best at the economy. You are fooling yourdelf if you think Obama is. He like everyone else will turn to an educated Economist for his advice. I would rather see intelligent deregulation than rampant regulation (look at NY city, not Wall St, to see just a little bit of the stupidity that is involved in over regulation).
So the best way to get out of this hole is to keep digging? Oh, oh wait, maybe if we dig -up-?
Despite Adam Smith not conceptualizing the Invisible Hand as people do today, and despite it being proven wrong mathematically, people still cling to the idea that we need to remove *all* regulations and let things sort themselves out. :sigh: God does not balance books, and Darwinism is not that extreme.
Funny, isn’t it, that it was a similar act of economic deregulation that lead to the Boston Tea Party?
Um, Bukendaa, you may want to re-think that I cannot back my claim that Palin lies. Let me post some links. It seems as if you cannot come to grips with reality, and I’m so sorry to hear that. Comparing Obama/Biden to Bush/Cheney?? Get real, that is quintesential apples to oranges.
http://www.factcheck.org/
It’s bipartisan, they even take cracks at the Obama campaign. The truth hurts, but if you can claim with a straight face that Palin hasn’t outright lied then you are lying to yourself. Pathetic.
Natural Selection is impeded by laws and regulations. Don’t kill Canadian Geese – they’re endangered. Don’t hit stupid people weaving in and out of traffic – they’re pedestrians.
Let nature take it’s course.
I’ll give you experienced, but Intelligent? Come on. He is so intelligent he asked a Democrat congressman, who is wheelchair bound to “stand up so everyone can see you.” at a rally? While looking at him? Come on. So smart he said Hillary might have been a better VP pick?
Well, there’s where we disagree. I would never call Biden one of the most intelligent politicians in the country. But I will agree that he has a sharp tongue.
Oh man, my sides…! I haven’t laughed so hard all day!
Thanks, EP!
ema, this is true. But, this is where Obama/Biden will put the final nail in the coffin. Biden’s gonna rip palin a new asshole! Drill Baby Drill! Bwahahahahahahahahaha!
I’m not at all worried.
Where iz zis – Poll of pollz.. I haz not been polled. Zerefore, ziz poll iz more media of liberality coming thru ze televizion zgreen to poizin ze mindz of ze peeplz.
Wait for it…
Wait for it…
lolz.
La Pequena Palin!
I’m talking TODAY’S polls, Admiral. The ones that show McCain down below pre-convention numbers. The one’s that show women overall now prefer Obama. The one’s that show that Americans are smart enough to see through the Republicans transparent ruse. They see that Palin is a theocratic, vindictive, power hungry windbag with no experience. Americans know that Palin is utterly incapable of running the country should McCain be unable to. You know, RECENT polls, not last weeks polls.
–
By the by, has McCain figured out that Spain is not in Central or South America yet? Seriously, that was scary, I think he’s really, no joke, no lol, losing his mind.
Last week the polls were the other way around. Polls change.
I wonder what the impact of the criminal hacking of Palin’s email account will be, now that it’s been linked to the Democratic Party? Interesting times.
Dude, your tinfoil needs adjusting. 4chan are the inbred hicks of the Internet. The /b/-tards are their retarded cousins. They don’t do things for political reasons. They do things to hurt people, because they think hurting things is funny. There is no link to anybody, and they would have done it to Obama or anyone else just as fast, and laughed just as hard, if they could have. /b/ on 4-chan makes this place look like a Quaker’s meeting. Seriously, you will need a full case of the brain soap if you go anywhere near /b/.
Bzzt! Wrong again.
The link is under my name.
pwnd by anonymous!
Great, the VP wannabe blabs about political work on a damn yahoo email account with piss poor password choices. Potatoe, anyone?
Wrong again.
It was a personal account, with pictures of her children on it.
Yet you blame the victim, like a typical conscienceless liberal.
Lemme guess, you tried to use “penis” as your email password but got the error “sorry, your password is too short”
Enema wins @comments!
Can we nominate that for burn of the week?
Nah- no one answered the statement- just fired off an insult.
( Dodging the issue- WIN)
Check the kerning!!!!!
If anything, the whole e-mail thing has a decidedly Rovian aroma about it….
“Your honor, since they were criminally* released to the public, we feel this evidence is seriously compromised and therefore inadmissable as evidence. And as the witness understood Chenyian logic enough to try to protect official state business communiques of dubious nature by using a private, non-official account to make said communications, there is therefore nothing in official state logs of relevance to this inquiry. We therefore ask this case be dismissed, and the American public eat this giant, steaming fecal-matter pie while we sit in our newly renovated, tax-payer paid office and laugh. Thank you.”
ding-ding-ding.
Fillerbunny advances to the lightening round.
Thank goodness a VP doesn’t have to do anything super secret! Whew, it’s hard being a hockey mom!
Just because someone has connections with a political party, doesn’t mean everything they do is politically motivated. Seth is right in that /b/ would, and does, do this to everyone they can.
Palin’s email being hacked is only notable because she was breaking the law by doing government work with the account. And that account is not subject to the same record keeping standards as real government email accounts.
This hacker was politically motivated. In an email explaining his actions, he said: “I read though the emails… ALL OF THEM… before I posted, and what I concluded was anticlimactic, there was nothing there, nothing incriminating, nothing that would derail her campaign as I had hoped, all I saw was personal stuff, some clerical stuff from when she was governor…. And pictures of her family”
Wanting to derail someones campaign doesn’t necessarily have to be politically motivated. Derailing her campaign is just a way of hurting someone, and some people just want to hurt other people to satisfy their own pathetic egos. And some people do things like this because they enjoy the attention, or the confusion it may cause. To paraphrase a line from Dark Knight. Some people just want to watch the world burn.
Yes, clerical stuff from when she was governor. That stuff should have been on her government provided email account, not her personal one.
She broke the law by using the wrong account. Using the account that didn’t have adequate record keeping standards.
PiMan please cite said law that she has broken. I don’t believe I have ever heard of a law that designates your work e-mail must be conducted on a work account. Government agencies instruct employees not to use work e-mail to conduct personal business and inform employees that any correspondance on work e-mail is open to public record. I agree that it would be a poor decision ethically to conduct such business on a personal account purely to avoid public record, but does that constitute a legal infraction?
You see, there is no law. PiMan will not be able to provide one.
I will not be able to find the exact law because exact laws are difficult to find. Websites dedicated to that sort of documentation have some of the worst search engines used today.
But that fact is, that general (political) correspondence is required to be archived for at least 3 years. A personal Yahoo account doesn’t have that sort of record keeping standard.
*dodge*
*dodge*
*skirt issue*
*dodge*
Whew! You must be skinny with all that moving around!
Be at peace. When she is VP she won’t be allowed to use e-mail any more than McCain will be allowed, because anything in an email is not protected under a subpoena. Lots of presidents and vice presidents in the past who have been e-mail junkies before their terms had to stop using e-mail entirely during their tenure in the Oval Office.
If keeping a few work emails mixed in with the personal ones in a personal e-mail account is the worst they can find on her, I’d say she’s doing pretty good. At least she’s not breaking bread with unrepentant terrorists and agitators.
Bzzt… you fail this time.
Even if Seth didn’t know that the supposed perpetrator is the son of a Dem, the kid is a frequenter of /b/, which makes him a /b/tard first and everything else second, especially when it comes to “hacking” email accounts and causing random raucous on the internet. /b/tards live for the thrill of “pwning” people and defending themselves against people they feel have slighted them (ie. Church of Scientology).
You want to see into the soul of /b/ without actually visiting? Read this:
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/B/
They have a great page for Palin too.
I’m sure a liberal hacked her account, but I highly doubt that a serious campaign would risk everything by trying to read her personal email. That’s something the republicans would do vice-versa. lol
Think “Watergate”
Maybe this will be Yahoo-gate! Lol!
You do realize that the minute you say that, Murphy’s Law is going to kick us in the balls. And when my balls are hurting from that kick, I am going to curse your name and the names of your descendants…
Who are you kidding, you don’t even KNOW the names of his descendants… pfft… lol
That’s it, your descendants too.
Damn.
these are not the polls your looking for…
I don’t think it’s possible to underestimate the intelligence of the masses
A better caption would have been ” I shall unleash my media minions upon Pailin!”
That would have been epic. I might do that.
“You have failed me for the last time, Admiral.”
Tis made, btw. Just for you homie.
You have made my bowels happy
Can’t we just cuddle instead?
“Bad Touch ! BAD Touch !”
Is someone breaking the two adult rule?
Are you offering?
Or ” Release the flying monkeys”
Or, release the Democratic Party hackers to break into Palin’s email account.
Watergate, anyone?
Can’t wait until they catch those creeps too.
Didn’t you hear? One of them has already been tracked down (probably). Hit my name for the link.
No, I couldn’t find the story on aol or yahoo just now although it was front page this morning, probably hiding it like usual. Thanks for the link!
Considering the main suspect is the son of a Democratic state representative, I’m not surprised the liberal media would want to keep it hidden.
Democrats love their dirty tricks, but they don’t like to be called on them.
Watch out…Here come the BLACK helicopters on whisper-mode! OH MY GOD, they’re wearing BLUE helmets!!!
Obama =/= every Democrat in the country. Every basket has it’s rotten apples, if the Watergate burglars weren’t connected to Nixon in any form, but still Republicans, that wouldn’t make Nixon an evil guy just because the burglars were Republican as well!
Obama has well-known criminal connections. Convicted slumlord Tony Rezko, and admitted terrorist Bill Ayers, to name just two close associates.
It’s no surprise that his campaign is connected to criminal activity. Obama is closely connected to the voter-fraud organization ACORN as well.
Don’t divert from the subject: does Obama support this crime or have anything to do with it, yes or no.
The Bill Ayers crap is old news, when Ayers commited his crimes, Obama was just finished sh*tting in his pants, lots of years later when Ayers was a free man again they were both in the same education board. Wow, whát a criminal connection. I’ve not heard about the others yet, sounds interesting and will read up about it. But first it’s sleepy time, it’s already over 2 AM here in Europe.
Ayers never did any time. He was always a free man. And, although it has been known that Obama and Ayers are connected for a while, there has been no clear addressing of the issue by Obama. At least not in a way that would explain his connection to a domestic terrorist.
If he is a terrorist, how is he a free man in plain sight of the federal government?
Should John McCain sever his ties with convicted felon — who certainly would be the dog to orchestrate something like this — Gordon Liddy?
Half of Congress are convicted of some type of crime, maybe more. And as far as Liddy is concerned (not that he amounts to much), there is a difference between burglarly and blowing up government buildings and cars. Neither defenseable, but there is a difference. Also, Liddy served his time. Ayers never did.
The Gub’mint dropped the charges on Ayers, mind. He turned himself in after being underground for a decade, and the government decided thst, in the end, blowing up a toilet didn’t amount to much.
Except for the minor fact that they were connected to Nixon.
Please name said dirty tricks and the sources. Until then, please stop posting.
So nice of that nice commenter to wish violence (beating out his eyeballs? Nice.) on someone who hasn’t been indicted of anything yet.
I think violence is not called for.
Prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is appropriate.
When a political party commits crimes to try to win an election, democracy is in danger.
So ANY crime committed against the repug party is automatically perpetrated by the Democrats? Even if the one who committed said crime is a democrat, that doesn’t mean it was some evil plan on part of the entire democratic party to defame somebody by exposing their email to the world. Do not judge the entire party based on the actions of an individual. If I did that, I’d have already painted the entire repug party as being propaganda parroting douchenozzles.
You have. But that is just you playing your part in the evil plan.
I have? How so.
Maybe she shouldn’t have been doing official business on a free e-mail service that has been known to be hacked into. It’s kind of asking for it in my opinion.
Would you say that a woman wearing a short skirt is asking to be raped?
She was violating policy. Women are free to wear short skirts.
Blame the victim, eh?
There was no policy violation, just a crime. A political crime perpetrated by a Democrat.
Whatev. No one’s been arrested yet.
And it’s interesting that you cry victim now when the Bush admin’s been tapping phones and monitoring library records for years now. Kinda like the suddenly feminists of last week.
Can’t have it both ways, plus the federal government tapping phones to catch terrorists is a lot different than democrats hacking into the private email of a state governor.
I’m not saying that what happened wasn’t a crime and shouldn’t be prosecuted. make it sound like it was Obama himself hacking into her e-mails. It was possibly the son of a Democrat, political affiliation unknown.
Are you sure that the feds are only tapping into terrorists lines? The whole point of the Constitution was to limit Government power, because our founding fathers knew that unchecked government powers led to tyranny. The problem that you are arguing is that a governor used a private menas to communicate government business — not the same as the government using private means to track private business. NOW before you give me the TERRORIST BS…Having written and developed a counter-terrorism course for the US Army Intelligence School, I think that I understand counter-terrorism, so I know their is a balance to achieve, I am merely stating the differences in your argument.
Not when they’re listening to all of us!
But they aren’t.
Are you sure?
Say yes.
OMG ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry, the disgruntled son with no power NOT linked to running the country is a lot different than the Commander in Chief doing it. Your comparison failed, please try again. Thanks for playing!
Commander in Cheif doing it to keep us safe from terror threats, and NOT doing it to everyone.
Then why did the government install splitters in most of the major phone companies? Devices designed to copy and record all phone calls, that could be monitored for any illegal activity without a warrant, then go to the FISA court with it and have the whole transaction retroactively legalized. Nice.
But Ema, if our founding fathers, the one’s who fought the revolution and who wrote the Constitution didn’t trust the benevolence of the CINC, should you? What if Bill Clinton had all those powers? WHo gets to decide who is a terrorist, if the process is kept out of the public eye? Sarah Palin?
FYI Rapes in general aren’t something that happen from men or women jumping out of alleys and tearing clothes off of an innocent pedestrian. The vast majority of rapes occur from an acquaintance. And it’s used as a power tactic. It has nothing to do with what a woman was wearing.
However, Palin using Yahoo! for e-mail is the exact reason why it was hacked. Try an analogy that works. If she had chosen to use the state issued e-mail, like state workers are supposed to do, then it wouldn’t have been hacked.
Men OR women? When does a woman ever jump out of an alley way and tear off anyones clothes? I mean seriously?
I would love to walk down your alley, ema. I would even wear easy pull off clothes.
Lol! I think she was being PC, I mean women can do anything a man can do? Right?
Nope.
Women rape too. It happens, whether you believe it or not.
And the point was that rape isn’t someone jumping out of an ally to tear off someone’s clothes.
Good to know that you can focus on semantics and not the issue at hand.
It is a good point ema. Rape isn’t about sex, it is about power.
Well, she may not have been asking for it but if she lived in Palin’s town she’d have to pay for the rape kit afterwards.
Would you say you have 47 chromosomes?
Oh I knew this was coming!! Blaming the victim, that was federal crime and if convicted that guy is looking at some real jail time. This will look real bad for the dems too.
So because a completely crazy marine gets home from Iraq and guns down a full supermarket, and his uncle worked for Hillary’s campaign, that would make Hillary evil and a crook all of a sudden? C’mon…
Disclaimer: this is a completly fictional story, any correlation with reality would be plain spooky.
The Democrats have been encouraging this sort of crime with their hysterical hate-mongering against Republicans. It’s no coincidence that a Democrat appears to be responsible.
And how do you know the person is a Democrat, or a Democrat supporting Obama, having ANYTHING to do with Obama’s campaign or is even guilty to this crime?? You’re trolling is starting to look more and more pathetic, you’re just generalising the whole of the Democratic supports, Obama and Obama’s campaign, do you really think Obama supports this crime?? It seems that tinfoil is poisonous.
Obama encourages his followers to use dirty tactics, such as intimidating radio stations that mention his connection to Ayers. While he may not be directly involved in this hacking, his attitude would have encouraged it.
The suspected hacker is the son of a Democratic politician with leftist views. He admitted in an email that his motives were political. Can you put two and two together?
plz to give evidenses. kthxbai.
Which designer drug did you abuse during your formative years?
What republicans see as hate mongering by dems is nothing more than the dems calmly pointing out the truth. Only thing we hate is when McCain posts an ad stating that Obama wants to teach sex ed to kindergartners when anyone with half a bush brain knows that he voted for legislation that would teach AGE APPROPRIATE sex education. I.E. teach kidnergartners what is innapropriate touching and to know the signs of a sexual predator. I don’t know about you but I’d want my youngin to be educated to know when a grown up is up to no good. It’s pathetic, low, no class, no morals, and just plain cheap. That ad was as unamerican as Republicans like to paint libs.
If your side can continue with the hateful rumors about Palin which end up being untrue in the end then maybe we can do the same thing. Everytime a new rumor comes up it is proven false no one apologizes, they just come up with a new one! Like he one about Palin not really being pregnant and it was really Bristol that gave birth to a Down’s Syndrome baby? She proved that one untrue didn’t she, but no apologies let’s just go after her parenting skills now!! I mean something must be wrong with her, right? She is a conservative woman, isn’t that the equivalent of stone age monster!?
Was that an unintentional funny, ema? I.e. the reference to CREEP: the Committee to ReElect the President through which the money to finance the Watergate breakins was funneled? Win either way.
Didn’t that sign claim Obama was a muslin?
Brilliant ticket, a VP candidate who uses yahoo for political emails (with security roughly equivalent in strength to wet paper, please don’t tell me her email was ‘hacked’ – if that kid’s a hacker I’m Kevin Mitnick) and a Presidential candidate who can’t use email in the first place.
Vote Luddite/n00b 08!
Luddite/n00b vs. Bigger n00b/establishment? Seems like a fair fight.
And the reason McCain does not use computers is because of injuries from Vietnam. I am not one of those people constantly talking about his war service (though I do appreciate it), but he is essentially handicapped when it comes to using a computer. (of course, now all you douchenozzles are going to flame him for being handicapped.)
The latter course of action being particularly easy for the douchenozzles on account of his being a straw man.
Let her choose the passwords for the nukes!!
Ex POW and his Special education teacher wife= EVIL ?
She’s not VP at all.
Not yet.
My, my, my but don’t some of our McCain supporting friends love to count their chickens before they’ve hatched.
When Obama kills all the Deacons, dissolves the Senate and unveils his country destroying super laser, will you all began to realize what a mistake this is?
you know, i’ve been coming here for a while, and all this mudslinging and talking in absolutes (democrats love their dirty tricks, it’s all the republicans fault, blah blah blah) it’s all bull, and it’s irritating when i come on here for lolz and all you guys can talk about is how terrible the other party is… it’s clear that BOTH parties have messed up time and time again, and both parties have their scandals. but how about showing a little back bone and own up to something once and a while, than acting like idiots saying it was the other sides fault, hm?
now i’m just going to leave a link to an interesting article i found, and i’m going to go laugh at some cat attacking a printer, excuse me. (after studying the article, i found a lot of people doing these kinds of things)
http://www.cracked.com/article_16656_6-brainwashing-techniques-theyre-using-on-you-right-now.html
In the words of your leader – ENOUGH! Please check the link on my name for the debunking of your rumors, especially the insideous rape kit rumor.
Sorry, not the debates that I watched. But you keep on believing that, just like the whole debacle of his Presidency.