Comments on: PALINDROME

By: parcel natal

parcel natal — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 03:32:52 +0000

Thank you a lot for sharing this with all people you actually recognise what you’re talking approximately! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally discuss with my site =). We may have a link trade arrangement between us

By: design

design — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:16:56 +0000

Its such as you learn my thoughts! You seem to understand so much approximately this, such as you wrote the ebook in it or something. I believe that you could do with a few % to power the message house a little bit, but other than that, that is fantastic blog. An excellent read. I will definitely be back.

By: PQ

PQ — Mon, 30 May 2011 17:42:51 +0000

No, that’s the opposite of what x-bert said, actually.

By: StatisticsNotRhetorics

StatisticsNotRhetorics — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:48:16 +0000

Bull-crap. Revenue goes down, jobs are lost, and so do wages. ever since Reagan started Trickle down economics, things have been steadily been getting worse.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/nov/09/mike-pence/mike-pence-says-raising-taxes-lowers-tax-revenues/

By: Inrock

Inrock — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:04:24 +0000

Well they’ll need a reason then won’t they?

By: Lifecolor

Lifecolor — Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:08:56 +0000

As a person whose name is a palindrome, I must say that the definition is wrong. But it’s hilariously applied here.
Another fun twist on words regarding Sarah Palin can be found here:
http://cheezburger.com/View/4142067712

By: kokopelli1000

kokopelli1000 — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:14:44 +0000

Ya know, Democrat pre 1970s would often equate to “racist Southern hick,” so I wouldn’t say they were really all that wonderful. It was around the late 60s/early they started getting better.

By: moonrunner

moonrunner — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:31:45 +0000

I don’t see why every forum on the web has to wind up being a political flame-fest. If you want to bash each others’ chosen political beliefs go over to sodahead.com. They love this sort of thing

By: McKavian

McKavian — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:01:04 +0000

That is why I just refer to the ‘two party system’ as the republocrats. They are they same people taking the same money.

By: LG

LG — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:00:25 +0000

fail

By: Meredith

Meredith — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:04:34 +0000

Too awesome for words. Isn’t this frightening?

By: DeathWyrmNexus

DeathWyrmNexus — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:36:01 +0000

Lovely, stay safe.

By: Leah

Leah — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:26:34 +0000

STFU
Palin fails as a woman anyway.
Every time i hear her voice, it makes me want to gouge my ears out with a rusty spoon.

By: Peter

Peter — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:45:54 +0000

To start with, I am talking about land stolen in 1948, when Israel was the aggressor. However, I would not support the violence inherent in Ahmeninejad’s statement.This is the way we in the west used to talk about Germany, North Vietnam, and Russia, but hopefully we have moved on.
If the Palestinians disarmed unilaterally, there would be peace, but only the kind of peace enjoyed by France and Poland in WW2, or by Latvia and Estonia and Georgia, among others, in the days of the Soviet Union.
The Palestinians are not even demanding all their land back – they are only demanding justice. It has been consistently denied them, by Israel and its allies.

By: Rorsc

Rorsc — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 08:09:42 +0000

Outsource them to India ?

By: Seriously?!?

Seriously?!? — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:08:27 +0000

Oh wow, you cant be serious. The Israeli’s could crush and kill all the Palestinians right now with little or no problem if they wanted to they dont need the Palestinians to disarm. That they haven’t, in the face of all the attacks they have endured, is telling. Now I will agree that the Israeli’s are no angels, they have commited some horrible crimes.
However lets do a pop quiz:
Of the two sides which is known for strapping on semtex vests loaded with ball bearings and hopping on a school bus or a sidewalk cafe?
Which side is known for, when a agreement has been made and a settlement has been abandoned than uses that land as a new place to lauch rockets indiscriminately into civilian centers.
Which side has a childrens show where a rabbit leads children in sing songs about killing jews.
My point here is that while israel isnt perfect by any means I am sick and tired of hearing about the “poor oppressed Palestinians’ when alot of their problems are self made.

By: Steph

Steph — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:33:34 +0000

Same to you, since that line is long overused.

By: Lallz

Lallz — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:15:08 +0000

Not to mention last night he said the $5000 insurance tax credit proposal “will go straight to the insurance company”. No shit, Joe.

By: DeathWyrmNexus

DeathWyrmNexus — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:04:33 +0000

In bed with a book.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:20 +0000

*cuddles Jackie*
mmmm warm ….

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:01:10 +0000

are you saying leftists don’t read? I beg to differ sir, I beg to differ.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:00:03 +0000

mine usually are because the word I am typing is outside of the visible range in this little posting block … no red squiggles to see = no spelling correction for me

By: i_tego_arcana_dei

i_tego_arcana_dei — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:39:26 +0000

YOU’RE NOT?!?!

i kid…

By: Christine

Christine — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:58:49 +0000

If the Palestinians laid down their arms, the Isrealis would take their chance right then to attack. The Isrealis do just as much attacking as the Palestinians do. And it’s absurd to think that if a specific side laid down their weapons the other side would be just perfectly okay with it. No one side here is the total aggressor and no one side is completely a victim, and you are delusional if you think so.

By: froofrou

froofrou — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:07:59 +0000

I love my husband’s .45. Stopping power or not, it’s a BIG ASS GUN and looks really scary, especially in my relatively small hand

By: DeathWyrmNexus

DeathWyrmNexus — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:53:28 +0000

As for your killing your own son scenario. If my kid out of the house that late, I will be waiting for them when they get home. I don’t gamble and people who are that jumpy shouldn’t be Ramboing down the stairs anyway.

By: x-bert

x-bert — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:49:04 +0000

You betcha it doesn’t!

By: x-bert

x-bert — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:44:58 +0000

also makes it easier to drop snakes on them

By: x-bert

x-bert — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:43:43 +0000

Sorry, but the way I see it… really the only people who see a wage increase are those making minimum wage.

By: Seriously?!?

Seriously?!? — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:25:40 +0000

You, of course, are talking about lands taken after being attacked? you also neglect to mention that every time they give some land back the Palestinians use that land to launch rockets into Israel. Lets not forget if the Palestinians disarmed their would be peace, what do you think would happen if the Israelis disarmed? As for your Iran comment I haven’t seen any comments from the Israeli PM saying, “Country name” shall be wiped off this Earth in a sea of fire.” So, you go ahead and make baseless comparisons between a democratic country and a cesspit that routinely hangs gays and whips rape victims if it makes you feel better.

By: shaztastic

shaztastic — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:44:00 +0000

Oh my God she said “nucular” last night.
I swear to God, recent republican candidates make drinking games out of debates.

By: cobrajoe

cobrajoe — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:30:11 +0000

Yeah, Omaha is a little rough.

That’s why I have a 12 gauge in my bedroom.

By: Peter

Peter — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:13:19 +0000

Wake up, America! They both say they “love Israel”. .What is this all about? Israel is a regime which seems hell-bent on outdoing Nazi Germany as a brutal invader and occupier of other people’s lands,and nuclear-armed as well. And you people say Iran must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. It is just rank hypocrisy.

By: DeathWyrmNexus

DeathWyrmNexus — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:23:47 +0000

I find that I don’t have to be conservative to be in favor of the death sentence. I just have to be pragmatic enough to realize that some people honestly don’t belong here. I am not the one saying this, they are. They’re actions speak louder than my words ever will.

If you see a rabid dog, you put him down. If you see a child killer, you put him down. I have argued til I feel the blood pulse in my head over this. The death penalty is not barbaric, what the killers did to be put there is barbaric.

By: DeathWyrmNexus

DeathWyrmNexus — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:19:05 +0000

Compare gun related deaths to car related deaths. Cars make it easier to kill people. We should ban cars. Object does not equal intent.

By: D'oh

D'oh — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:43:52 +0000

@
Christine
October 2nd, 2008 at 8:18 am:
That’s an old mantra, and it’s nonsense. It’s not about the fact that people kill people, it’s about the fact that guns make it really easy for people to destroy people’s lives.

By: D'oh

D'oh — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:40:08 +0000

@froofrou
October 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm:

Yes that would be YOUR mindset Perhaps not the mindset of a completly crazy guy who wants nothing but sweet sweet revenge. You can’t speak for everyone.

By: NeoApocalypse

NeoApocalypse — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:04:13 +0000

This….
one….
is….
AWE-SO-ME….
:-O

By: i_tego_arcana_dei

i_tego_arcana_dei — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:54:53 +0000

I’m a poly-cotton blend

*the crowd roars*

“STONE HIM! LEVITICUS SAYS WE HAVE TO!”

By: i_tego_arcana_dei

i_tego_arcana_dei — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:52:28 +0000

THANK YOU!

I make typos all the time, it’s not cause I can’t spell or properly use grammar. it’s because I SUCK AT TYPING….

By: PiMan

PiMan — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:58:59 +0000

USA has at or near the highest rates of gun ownership, and one of the highest rates of crime (and gun related death) in the OECD. I see a correlation.
But conversely, Italy has one of the lowest rates of gun ownership and the just slightly lower rates of crime and homicide than the US (but still a decent margin lower than the US).
Most other countries have lower ownership rates and lower crime rates.
.
This led me to the honest(ish) conclusion that, guns don’t kill people. Americans and Italians kill people.

By: Christine

Christine — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:57:35 +0000

You have every right to look at a statement and go “huh.” But to make broad assumptions based on that statement, without doing the research as to his actual position makes me go “huh.” If you don’t want to admit that, then fine with me. But I have repeatedly stated both candidates positions on the issue and the statement f clinging to guns really does not relate to leave the decision to the local municipalities. Nor does it say anything about controlling guns, banning guns, not banning guns giving everyone a weapon, or prosecuting a gun manufacturer. (I’m not saying that you said this. And for the record, I have never attributed any kind of those statements that you keep getting so defensive about to you either.) And your interpretation of :clearly criticizing” is not the way that everyone else interpreted it, it’s just the way it was reported. I’m not denying that it could be interpreted that way, but I’m also admitting that it could be seen in other lights.

By: PiMan

PiMan — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:42:49 +0000

So your saying that it takes almost a decade for the president to get anything done?

By: PiMan

PiMan — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:38:52 +0000

And a similar amount as the one he was replying to.

By: Noel

Noel — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:36:38 +0000

When did I say otherwise? o.o The conversation had nothing to do with Obama. Someone claimed Palin wasn’t influenced by God, when she has said she is. Relevance fail?

By: Seriously?!?

Seriously?!? — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:33:40 +0000

heh well click on my name now for the slate article.

By: Seriously?!?

Seriously?!? — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:32:56 +0000

fired as well*

typing FAIL

By: Seriously?!?

Seriously?!? — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:32:05 +0000

Slate has throughly debunked the rape-kit myth. Click on my name to read the article. The gist being that they would attempt to charge the insurance company for the cost of the kit, but doesnt say what would happen if the company refused. However it does go on to quote the current mayor as saying that there is no record of any victim being charged for a rape-kit.

As for the banning of books, so it is now illegal to ask about the process for banning books? Were these books ever banned? if the librarian was fired for refusing to ban the books did the following librarian ban them or was he/she fired as we?

By: MAD

MAD — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:16:52 +0000

Excuse me? Are you serious? I’m swedish and I can tell you
that gun ownership here is far from 100%. Presently we have
635 000 licenced gun owners in a population of 9 million (I
have no idea how many adults etc.) In the northern parts
there’s quite a few hunters who have several rifles and
that gives us a higher percentage but those people use it for
hunting, not for self defence. We have laws saying that it is
illegal to keep your gun and the trigger/cartridge for ammo
in the same place which means you can never store a fully
assembled gun at home. We also have a lot more strict law
then the US both for getting a permit and for what type of gun
you are allowed. E.g. it’s almost only possible to buy a
handgun if you compete in shooting or a rifle if you’re a hunter.

Also it’s near impossible to get any kind of semi- or fully
automatic guns unless you’re in a profession that would call
for it. And if you do get a license you only get it for a maximum
of 5 years, then you have to get it renewed.

In my opinion I’d say that’s a reason to why we have so few
incidences related to guns here

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:41:47 +0000

Well played.