Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Little Bill O’Reilly

Recommend other videos for Pundit Kitchen to post: punditkitchen@gmail.com

Incorrect source or offensive?

» 168 comments

  1. Lolnathan says:

    That’s creepy…

  2. oh says:

    that was the best thing i’ve ever seen.

  3. Matt says:

    Stephen Colbert’s “Baby Bear”?

  4. ladyrazzle says:

    I was not aware that it was possible to be creepier than Bill O’Reilly. I was mistaken.

    • Lolnathan says:

      This kid makes Bill O’Reilly look like a radical leftist commie.

      • German says:

        You aren’t very bright are you? He makes Bill O’Reilly look like the radical rightwing jackass that he is.

        • Lolnathan says:

          Probably a lot brighter than you. You don’t know how to behave on the Internet do you? Obviously I was referring to this character being so crazed that it even makes Bill O’Reilly look tame. Now, go back to whatever website you came from. Thanks.

          • wykkedfae says:

            What do you expect? He’s German, it can’t be helped.

            • MosesBad says:

              Rrrrright. Absolutely unbiased towards germany you are. Your statement could on the other side be used as a validation, all americans are 150% self-centered (mathematically impossible, for you not in the know).

              • wykkedfae says:

                Of course, that’s assuming that I’m an American… which I am. Oh, and also assuming that I’m serious… maybe I am, maybe I’m not. Now, toddle off elsewhere with your impossible math.

                • MosesBad says:

                  And you have what right to tell me to go away? ‘cuz you’re American? You make me chuckle.

                  • wykkedfae says:

                    No, I have the right to tell you to go away because I can say what I like. YOU have the right not to listen.

                    • MosesBad says:

                      And you have the right to take your beloved gun, kill your parents, then your children and then yourself – go ahead, it’ll be a blast – literally

              • Blackup says:

                Oh please, yes. Keep up the continued jackassery and dissing Americans.
                Your completely biased hate towards americans is probably due to the fact that your country won’t let you leave because you so desperately HATE the one you live in, so you think if you say “eff america” enough times they’ll send you over here on a suicide mission.

                Go back to Kazakhstan, you Arabic Nazi.

                • PiMan says:

                  The internet may not be serious business, but people like you aren’t helping anyone.

                  Anywhere.

                • MosesBad says:

                  No need to jackass Americans, you do that fine all by yourself.

                  • Carrera594 says:

                    Your just all pissy because even though we might be in “recession”, even though by definition we are not, our country is still doing better than your will ever do.

                    • Gio says:

                      Uh…Carrera. As a fellow American, I’m going to ask you to refrain from speaking anymore. Your lack of grammar skills as well as lack of knowledge as to what a recession is (considering we are, in fact, in one) does not help the cause any. Thank you.

            • MissStepha says:

              My father is German (which makes me “part German,” I suppose) and that still made me giggle.

              On a sidenote, is your screenname referencing Elphaba (of Wicked)? Utter win. ;D

              • wykkedfae says:

                It is not, but kudos on the uber-trivia! ^_^ Nah, I have an obsession with faeries, and most people do not realize that they are not the kind-hearted sprites they are portrayed.

                • JimButcherfanboy says:

                  What? But… but… Nooooooooo! Santa Claus! It says right here in this old english story-oh wait, they stranded him in time and space for 20 years. Uhm, here in this one-never mind, blood sacrafice. And in that one there, the fairies took a baby boy and raised him and-oh. They never let him go back and treated him as a dog.

          • wykkedfae says:

            Funny, my son didn’t. Damned c-section…

        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

          eh heh… Exaggeration, it is the word you didn’t realized applied to Lolnathan’s statement.

      • Jamieteevee says:

        And yet he uses Bill O’Reilly’s actual words. Don’t you hate it when mockery is so precise?

  5. ema says:

    I think that child will be permanently scared for having made that.

  6. DeathWyrmNexus says:

    Curse this place for lacking speakers on my computer…

  7. teh penguin of doom says:

    Is it me or does that kid’s head seem rather big?

  8. They played this on Fox News’ “Strategy Room” webcast this afternoon. Mike Straka (the show’s producer/director) then informed the panel that O’Reilly himself had seen it and found it rather funny.

    Personally, I think it’s a little over the top, but it’s not a bad parody.

  9. angrycat says:

    Your dirty sex makes God send hurricanes…win.

  10. robinhoo says:

    Holy crap, that’s disturbing. I want to get that horrid wig-thing off that little boy, and then take him and give him candy and let him play on the playground. You know, be a child… not a creepy hatemonger like Papa Bear.

  11. froofrou says:

    Ok, my stupid work computer (that won’t let me install Flash) won’t let me play this video. Where is it on YouTube?

  12. AliCat says:

    That was really disturbing seeing a kid saying that kind of hate speech…

    • KoS says:

      No kidding. I don’t really find that funny, so much as…disturbing. Kids shouldn’t be saying that kind of stuff.

    • glenn says:

      Honesty is tough for you isn’t it.

      • some guy says:

        no a kid hoping someone drives their car into water,
        e.i their impending death,
        is disturbing.

        • Blackup says:

          Umm. NO.
          A kid acting and hoping someone drives their car into water is NOT disturbing.

          It’s called Dark Humor.

          And for KoS:
          I guess kids shouldn’t be playing in R-rated films, or playing in horrorshow PG-13′s.

          • PiMan says:

            That could only be the case if the kid found humour in said death.
            It is possible the kid doesn’t find such a death humorous. What then? It isn’t dark humour where there isn’t humour.

            • Gio says:

              All depends on who’s watching. He may not find it funny, but I sure would.

              • Ben says:

                I say, it’s disturbing AND funny. Frankly, these days the only things I find funny are both, actually. All this “laugh at disturbing shit because it’s better than swearing at it” stuff seems to have altered my brain somewhat…

  13. JustErin says:

    Who are this kid’s parents? I know its supposed to be a joke or whatever but my God if my kid ever said half the words that kid was told to say…

  14. tygrr says:

    That is extremely offensive and inappropriate for this site. I’m surprised and disappointed in the LOLsite.

    • notnaive says:

      Have you ever been to this site before?

    • ryszard says:

      Don’t get out much, do you?

    • ethana2 says:

      This is the internet, tygrr.

      Love it or LEAVE IT. And when you leave it, take all the prudes with you!

      • seren000 says:

        I think this is a disgrace. So far the people objecting to this have been called prudes, lacking in humour and told to put up with this sort if thing or leave. What I want to know is why does the internet have to appeal to the lowest common demominator? Isn’t there soom for decent people here?

        • ck says:

          Dude, you’re on a damn LOL site.

        • Jenessa says:

          It’s just supposed to be funny. So the kid said the f-word, big deal. It’s just words and clearly this is made to make fun of Bill, so it’s not like the kid or the people who handed him this script actually believe any of the bigoted things they said

        • Christine says:

          You didn’t have to click play. No one was forcing you to watch the whole thing. If you didn’t like it that much, I feel you could have figured it out within the first 10 seconds and hit pause and moved on. As for disgrace, there are a lot more disgraceful things on the internet, and if this is your far end of the spectrum, then I suggest you stick to Cute Overload.

          • seren000 says:

            The video is a disgrace and yes I could have clicked pause. You have misunderstood however. What I was also objecting to is the bullying tactics being uses on anyone who has the nerve to object to it. The comments quickly turn insulting.

        • DeathWyrmNexus says:

          You could have just hit stop at any time instead of watching it all the way through. I have had to do that with some videos from time to time then again, not for a long time now. Tis the internet. If you don’t like something, nobody is making you stay.

        • wykkedfae says:

          There is plenty of ROOM for decent people, but what makes it your right to define decent? If you object to it, that automatically makes it indecent?

  15. Wesley says:

    There’s hope for this country’s future after all.

  16. wykkedfae says:

    This is so full of win and awesome that to continue living seems bleak and pointless

  17. Suma says:

    That was sooo stupid, I’ve just wasted 53 seconds of my life

  18. Kat says:

    I don’t know who Bill O’Reilly is, and from the clip I can tell I wouldn’t like him, but the kid was so freaking cute. I needed a good laugh today thankyou!

    • well says:

      Most conservatives don’t much like him either. He’s just an oddball who got a T.V. show.

      • Musicmom870 says:

        That actually makes me feel better about conservatives. I’m glad to hear you say it. When I was young my dad would watch Mr. Buckley and nod in agreement about how wonderful Reagan was (seems like Thatcher was in there, too). I grew up thinking that’s how conservatives were–brilliant like my dad and eloquent like Bill Buckley (though mistaken, of course!). I’ve been shocked to this day that the “conservatives” I meet now are mouth-breathing whackos ready to parrot whatever Limbaugh or O’Reilly said. It makes me sad because at one time conservatives were civil and (most of them) moral. They could discuss issues and reason over problems. Maybe there’s hope out there yet, if what you say is true.

    • Jenessa says:

      He’s basically a really conservative pundit and most people don’t like him because he’s very rude and interrupts and attacks people without any really reason or provocation.

      • Gio says:

        Also, he has a tendency to make up facts, or completely disregard the real facts and go on with his own inane ramblings. If I felt like doing it, I’d find the video where a CNN anchor basically tells O’Reilly to get his shit straight or shut up. It was classic.

  19. Ryan says:

    Nobody saw the Frank interview yesterday? Bill O screams worse than that kid did. Awesome clip though.

  20. Taco says:

    That was funny. If anything though, the democrats are more like communists, and the republicans are more like nazis.

    • well says:

      Not really. Nazi is short for the National Socialist Party (in German of course, thus the ‘z’ instead of an ‘s’). They were socialist and anti-capitalist, very much like the modern Democratic party. Communist is a better descriptor for the Democrats though, because Nazi implies the fascist ideals which used the state as a vessel to promote the Master Race. So neither Democrats or Republicans are really like Nazis, though Democrats would be closer to them if you absolutely had to call someone (inaccurately) a Nazi. Democrats are more Communist in ideology, whereas Republicans (current candidate excluded) are generally more Capitalist.

      • froofrou says:

        Do your research a little better. The Nazi party were fascists, not socialists. The two ideals are almost always mutually exclusive. *shakes head and walks away*

        • ryszard says:

          Luv ya, but–do SOME research. The above was written by someone who really knows something about Poli Sci. Don’t get much of that here.

        • DERP says:

          BUT DATZ NOT WUT RUSH LIMBAH SED!!111LMAO

        • well says:

          You’d best take your own advice. But here’s some info for you.
          Socialist was the name of the party (National Socialist German Workers’ Party in full), and was how they got their start. They had a welfare state ideology (like Socialists), the catch was it only applied to “fit” Germans (i.e. Aryans).
          Nazi fascism was very different than Italian fascism. The fascism of Italy could be considered mutually exclusive to socialism. Not so with the Nazi version. Fascism in general draws elements from both the left and the right. Like socialists, Nazis were anti-Capitalist.
          Now I’m not saying the two words are synonyms. They are very *very* different. But the part you seemed to miss was the comparison of Nazis to Republicans and Democrats. And as I said, Nazi is not an apt term for *either* party, but it is *closer* to the Democrats than Republicans because they are more socialist in nature and have some ideas that at least in theory could be supported by the Nazi viewpoint. By the same token Democrats would be closer than Republicans to Communists and Socialists as well (and obviously I’m not saying Democrats are exactly communist, socialist, or nazi – they’re their own thing, though socialist is close). Republicans are capitalist, which is in direct opposition to communism, socialism, and nazism.

          • froofrou says:

            I can admit when I’m misinformed without losing dignity :-) I bow to your superior knowledge on the subject and consider myself pwned :-) I will admit that my schooling in poli-sci was rather sparse, but I had always been taught what I posted: that fascism and socialism are opposite sides of the left-right spectrum.

            • froofrou says:

              It was a worm hole.

            • PiMan says:

              Click name for an explanation of the situation that I like. Left/right alone is not descriptive enough.

              • froofrou says:

                Oooh, I like that! I’ve never seen it spelled out that succintly, but, as I said before, I had been taught one thing and one thing only. I’m totally going to use that in the future!

                • well says:

                  I used to know an online test that gave you an idea of where on that chart you personally would fall, but I can’t for the life of me find it. It also kindly marked certain sections of the graph so you could see what region would be considered, for example, Totalitarianism. If I do I’ll post a link here or tack it onto a future lol if it takes me a long time to dig it up.

                  • froofrou says:

                    I love you guys :-)

                  • froofrou says:

                    I found one. Don’t know if it was the one you were looking for, but it was on the site PiMan sent me to. I tested pretty much exactly where I thought I would, LOL. Left/Right: 2.12, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.54.

                    • well says:

                      It’s not the same, but it’ll do. ;D

                    • PiMan says:

                      (New image under my name). I find the chart to be skewed to the right. Nearly every politician, from nearly every country, falls in the top right quadrant. I think the centre point needs to be moved to where ever the median of all politicians are.
                      I also find this test to be skewed to the left, in that almost everyone I know who has done the test has ended up on the left side, even when they vote for the right wing party.

                      • well says:

                        It depends on if you follow the intent of the questions. Many of them it would be easy to say “this is how it is” when you should be answering “this is how I feel” and vice versa (which can turn an agree to a disagree and skew your results). It’s not so much the test is skewed, as it is not quite clear enough on how they want you to answer (though I still ended up on the upper right when I took it). I don’t think the chart is skewed to the right so much as most politicians fall in that area as they define it. If you read all the boring text it makes sense. Adjusting the graph wouldn’t be mathematically sound either.

          • Blackup says:

            Mr. Goodwin strikes again.

            • nah says:

              It’s Godwin

              • um says:

                Would it even apply since the conversation *started* from a video mentioning Nazis, since it wasn’t like something unrelated was being talked about and it devolved into a discussion that turned to someone being compared with Nazis.

      • ryszard says:

        Thank you for reasoned and accurate exposition of subject (FINALLY). Srsly.

        “The logical extreme of the right is anarchy. The logical extreme of the left is totalitarianism.” -Unk.

      • PiMan says:

        The Nazis themselves were actually very much centrists economically. Their name was a bit of a misnomer.

      • PortlandMark says:

        They were so *not* anti capitalists. They loved to see government and corporations fused into one entity. Kind of like, hmm, gimme a second, it’ll come to me. What’s that country with the huge economy that just started buying worthless securities?

        • well says:

          They very much were anti-capitalist. It’s part of why they hated America. If you want to do some easy research look at the wikipedia entry for “Nazi”. Just a small section of that I’ll post here for you:
          “Nazi publications and speeches included anti-capitalist (especially anti-finance capitalist) rhetoric. Hitler attacked what he called “pluto-democracy,” which he claimed to be a Jewish conspiracy to favor democratic parties in order to keep capitalism intact. The “corporation” was attacked by orthodox Nazis as being the leading instrument of finance capitalism, with the role of Jews emphasized. The National Socialist party described itself as socialist, and, at the time, conservative opponents such as the Industrial Employers Association described it as “totalitarian, terrorist, conspiratorial, and socialist.””
          Did they always follow what they preached? No, but then again – they were the Nazis. A group considered so deviant that their symbol was banned by religions that had used it for ages prior, and who became a staple “bad guy” for Indiana Jones and a number of other pulp stories.
          The other half of ‘nazi’ is Nationalist – which is where they deviate from traditional socialism (which opposes the idea of nations), in that all of the actions of the people are to be considered in service to the Reich. Which was, of course, an instrument to further the betterment of the ‘true German’ people.

  21. Aloha says:

    ewwwww! (the video not the discussion) that was just disturbing…

  22. redswinglinestapler says:

    BAHAHAHAHA

  23. J says:

    LOL, I think I just peed a little. The end is priceless.

  24. Vectoor says:

    No longer available :(

  25. Failerella says:

    It’s still there, just not at that link.

    Try this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nEmPvGS3Ts

  26. JenniLamb says:

    Was this removed by YouTube? Wow, they’ve gotten really Chinese about the free speech thing, if you know what I mean.

    • Lolnathan says:

      YouTube’s content removal policy is terrible. Just about anyone can have anything taken down. Its a “remove first and ask questions later” policy.

      • lol says:

        IIRC, they pull down thousands of anti-Scientology vids one day because they were threatened somehow. Next day they were back up.

    • Donkephant says:

      It’s a good thing there’s about a half dozen of these and YouTube only bothered to take down the one that’s getting thousands of hits because it’s up on Pundit Kitchen. I wonder how long this duplicate will take to get taken down.

  27. J says:

    Someone who can’t take a joke probably complained. I wish I would have downloaded it before they killed it.

  28. disturbed says:

    That was horrible! That kid’s parents should be ashamed of themselves.

  29. Carey says:

    PRICELESS! Great acting from the kid, too.

  30. divaofpanic20 says:

    AH HA HA! LO freaking L!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  31. Ruth Morrison says:

    That kid’s gonna be messed up….

  32. quintazz says:

    parenting FAIL

    • Blackup says:

      I bet you are/will be a parenting fail.

      Let the kid have some fun.
      He OBVIOUSLY signed up for it.

      And in fact. It’s probably not a kid. Just a midget.

      (PS: Wrong website.)

      • PiMan says:

        Just listen to him for a moment. That is not the voice of an adult. Not even of a midget adult.
        You are right that the kid would have signed up for it.
        Failblog tends to bleed onto here a lot. That only makes sense when we are talking about politicians.

  33. ChicaLellow96 says:

    Hey–i wuzn’t abul to see deh videoh. saiz it waz no longer avalabul.

  34. me says:

    Could you just stop leaving comments that say “I can’t believe I watched the whole thing” or “No one made you click play”

    The kid should’ve been spoofing an NBC corespondant.

  35. Hallelujah.! says:

    That’s actually super creppy.

  36. skutr says:

    Boy people sure read waaaaaay more into this than was intended. It was political PARODY(though scarily accurate and not that far removed from reality) in the best of the Saturday Night Live tradition. The humour would have stood by itself if an adult performed it, but people have always gotten a kick when a child “plays grown-up” frequently better than grown ups do themselves and being a child reinforces the fact that the real O’ Reilly can come off acting like a spoiled immature brat so why not have a child portray an adult who actually does display the worst ascpects of childlike behaviour? We are talking layers of social commentary here and innuendo here. And what about how TALENTED the child ACTOR is. THAT is the real kick to it!! He probably had FUN doing it. To be so young and to be able to effectively pick up the characteristics of the source and spit them back out in an such an over the top manner is impressive for any performer especially one of his age. And to him the thoughts and words were a script and I am sure ( at least I hope so, and this is where some of you have expressed your concerns that so disturbed you) his parents let him know in no uncertain terms what is acceptable for a skit is NOT acceptable at home and have explained to him that the script is just that something to lampoon a celebrity and the thoughts and behaviour expounded therein are not to adopted as anyway once off camera, or no XBox and McDonalds for you young man if you act that way at home!

  37. swa says:

    Being from ouside the usa, i didn’t know the guy.
    So i ‘youtubed’ him and wow… what a dick.

  38. shelli says:

    That was really disturbing.

    First off, that a parent would allow their child to speak like that, secondly that he might actually know what he’s saying, and thirdly, that he will grow up to think those things.

    Shudder.

  39. Ember says:

    This video made me LOL. The comments made me LOL. A win win I’d say.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up