Nice.

This isn’t a jab at Obama, asshat; it’s a cheeky joke about getting a call for groceries and those wonderful little moments where the spouses don’t seem to be on the same page.

Snopes.com explains/debunks this and many other Obama myths.

I hope that the submitter done this as a mockery of the original intent or to expose it to shame…but i fear that’s not this case.

It’s amazing how after all this years the word “communism” (and it’s associated “socialism”) spread fear into ignorant masses of USA.
Pavlovian conditioning communism=stalin&gulag?
As a foreigner i cannot be more astonished and by some means sad for this waste of brain. Obviously Obama is a rich bastard, who people think can reach so high? But after all a mean bastard is still better than an old creepy warmongering meaner conservative bastard.

But in the end whathever side win Usa are stil lucky…they don’t got Berlusconi.
Goddamn he both raise taxes and cut budget at the public services beyond every reasonable measure, still leaving in place parasites and lakey.
It’ll can make someone desire Mc Cain instead. Or Putin. (Uhm mentioning him late night could cost me nightmares…he scares me… )

That’s Pittsburgh

I think that’s a pro-Obama slap at Bush and, by extension, McCain.

Still funny though…

The original intent of my reply was to point out the nearly total hijacking of PunditKitchen by “the left” or “libs” or whatever by illuminating this LOL as an exceedingly rare thing: An LOL with some “negativism” towards Saint Barack. Some (eddiepscetti, CarmenT) questioned whether or not there really was ANY negativism towards Him, which prompted my 2nd reply clarifying that, well…. not “negative” as such… and certainly not aimed at The Savior directly.

Interestingly, the degree of negativity towards Him is immaterial to my central point:
* If the prevailing thought was that there was a LOT of negativity, that would make this LOL stand out like a forehead zit.
* If CW says there’s NO negativity, then the purity of the site’s anti-right (or at least never-anti-left) standing is unblemished.

I sure didn’t expect the outlandish repartee that it seems to have sparked. For those willing to listen, this wasn’t meant to be negative, in any respect.

As a forty year old husband and father I was merely poking at the irony that two years on the campaign trail has to have created in Sen. Obama’s life. It’s folly to think that “picking up groceries” would even be a theme in a conversation with his wife, at this point in time. Ironically enough, I’m sure they’ve got staff for that sort of thing, as well. However, I also know that Sen. Obama calls home EVERY SINGLE DAY to spend time talking to his kids. With all of the jumping around that he’s done, recently, and the number of states he’s had to hit in his battleground campaign it juts seemed silly not to wonder if Michelle is able to keep track of it all.

Liberative, conservital, republicrat, demican… whatever. It’s not about parties and policies any more. The lines have blurred. Pick the person you believe most in. Support the policies you believe the most in. Vote your heart… BUT GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

Let’s try to keep laughing and smiling, people. Sadness is too contagious.

I was waiting for the “stick of butter” though…..

…like “Hey everybody, Obama’s a Muslim, and he sucks, and the world is going to end when he gets elected, and and and WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA”

Whatever negativity is there is directed at Mrs. Her Holiness, the implication being that she’s so:

* domineering that she can’t resist making hubby bring home groceries despite his being 1) a leading presidential candidate and 2) in another state.
or
* stupid that she doesn’t REMEMBER that hubby is (1) and (2).

Anyway, I’ll check back in about 6 months, which is about the time a new lib-bashing () LOL will be posted and manage to scrape together enough votes to get “published”.

Who said this? Carl Marx? Vladimir Lenin? Barak Obama?

No. Teddy Roosevelt. Who was, you may recall, a Republican.

Here’s another quote for you:

“It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more in that proportion.”

Again, was this said by a socialist or a communist? No; it is from Adam Smith.

A News & Politics LOL that’s actually somewhat kinda-sorta negative about Barry O.

Of course, it’s not negative towards Him (or his policies, statements, views, etc.) directly as that would be in violation of the Annointed One Love-Fest Policies & Procedures (Chris Matthews, Editor). But still, I’m glad I caught the Halley’s-Comet-rare zing(ish) aimed at a lib.

A News & Politics LOL that’s actually somewhat kinda-sorta negative about Barry O.

Of course, it’s not negative towards Him (or his policies, statements, views, etc.) directly as that would be in violation of the Annointed One Love-Fest Policies & Procedures (Chris Matthews, Editor). But still, I’m glad I caught the Halley’s-Comet-rare zing(ish) aimed at a lib.