-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Hate to break it to you… | ROCK HARD PLACE Next »
» 182 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Vila Restal on Keeping the Internet Hone… William Thompson on Vandals Cashing In keshet the adequate on Ballistic Marshmallows Dave on Must Be Blah History Mont… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Deacon Blues on Spock Facepalm imnotreallyhere on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… LaFeeVerte on Ballistic Marshmallows 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
You blinked
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
No gurls allowed
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
Maybe if I Stay Very Still I'll Be All Right
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Great Escape
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Nom Distraction
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Two-by-Snores
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
So Why Was It The Best I've Ever Had??
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Counteract That Yoga With Cookies
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
SUCK IT, NOT TREBEK!
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Accurate Claim is ACCURATE
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
American Idol Kyle Crews Totally Looks Like The Big Green Patrick Reena
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Big Head Harry Potter Characters
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Ring of the Day: I'm Batman
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
String Theory
Wedinator - Your special day... is hilarious.
Skyrim First Dance
Five Minute Getaway - Beautiful Travel and Vacation Photos
Gaudí-esque complex, Punta del Este, Uruguay
Set Phasers to LOL - Sci Fi and Fantasy LOLs
I Didn't Know
Animal Memes - A Meme-nagerie of Famous Internet Critters
Crazy Girlfriend Praying Mantis: It Was My Doctor. He Says I'm Dying. How Bad Do You Feel Now, Lady?
Aren’t there false advertising laws in the US?
they’re not advertising anything.
They’re advertising Fox News.
Fail
I linked to my favorite Fox News clip. Ever.
That one is rather good.
The daily show’s intro last night was golden.
(linked btw)
Technically, there’s an asterisk after Fair & Balanced.
I think that might be a trademark symbol.
They trademarked Fair and Balanced??! What are the rest of us to do?
They have F&B trademarked but anyone can use it now. Al Franken used it on one of his books and defeated Fox News in court.
Anyone can use it as long as it is used in satire. That is how Al Franken won that case. Not anyone can use that name just because they want to.
That’s not a name, those are two concepts really. It sounds rather ridiculous.
It sounds utterly ridiculous.. you can’t just copyright a commonly used phrase. Oh.. except that America owns the rights to “peace and liberty” and no one else can have it.
You can copyright anything you want. The key lies in your ability to defend your copyright. Not everything that happens out there affects one’s copyright, to defend it, there has to be some chance of confusion. I.E. I could open “Fair and Balanced Chicken Palace” serving the finest fried chicken anywhere and it is likely that a court would find that I violated Fox’s copyright. But if CNN were to use the phrase in advertising in a NON-satirical manner, then that WOULD be a violation of the copyright.
IT IS NOT LIKELY.. that Fair and Balance Chicken violates… sorry, for some reason I haven’t been able to type all day…. Mad cow disease or something.
Might even be one of those sparkly things.
Ok morons, There are three liberals in that picture. Find a MSM line up with TWO conservatives in it.
howobamawon.com
I love how it’s OK for the media to be liberal, but as soon as a Conservative news show is advertised, it is immediately condemned as biased. sheesh.
Oh, please like all the other media ISN’T liberal.
“All” the other media?
Okay, NEARLY all the other media.
At least Fox News gives BOTH sides equal time, unlike the DNC propaganda network (aka MSNBC).
I wouldn’t call that equal time. I mean, they can do whatever they want with their network, but it’d be nice if they’d just own up to what it is. I flip over about once an evening and what I see is this “equal time” usually given to some hand-picked dufus or is spent in a shouting match of interruption. I mean, there’s no offense in having a conservative television station; let’s just call a spade a spade.
You could argue the same with MSNBC or even CNN.
Both of those networks had people believing that Obama had already won, and now look how close it’ll be.
I’ll concede that having O’riley is stupid because I don’t like him either, but I really believe that the media is biased. I’ve seen the way the cover news, I’ve watched them cover the back round of Joe the plumber more then Obama and I’m very certain that CNN, MSNBC and ABC would worship him if they felt there was a reason to.
Secondly, because these are main sources of media, anything that looks like it leans to the other side might look extreme just because it’s one out of the many that decide to be different. That one is going to stand out, even if it actually stands in the middle, it’ll look like it stands to the far right.
That being said, I do come from a city where the left has begun to destroy whats great about it, and our newspaper doing NOTHING to cover some of the issues. It’s been frustrating, i don’t think this is what life is like in other places, but I’ve seen what strong bias has done and it’s very bad.
This is why I will be watching the BBC’s coverage. Even Ted Koppel defected to the BBC.
The media is a product, just like any other product. They have a target audience, and they cater to that audience to keep the advertising dollars flowing in.
So why deal with the media when you have THE DAILY SHOW and THE COBERT REPORT!!!
You sir win.
Let me draw your attention to the handle “jerseyGIRL”. Just sayin’…
I agree. Some people here at work keep putting on foxnews in the business lounge & it’s very annoying to have to listen to Cavuto or that chick afterward argue with people they don’t agree with. I actually shouldn’t even say argue because they yell over that person & you can’t hear what they’re trying to say. It’s ridiculous & unprofessional.
On that note, I think that Nancy Grace should be smacked.
Absolutely.
I watch FOX because they show videos of Dems saying things that you will never see on the Main media- shooting themselves in the foot, or getting caught in a hotel with their mistress while their wife is dying of cancer. It’s odd how those videos never get shown elsewhere.
So you’re saying, you watch FOX because they’re showing talkshow-material instead of news?
… sounds plausible.
Lol I’ll give you that. I watch the Daily Show for that same reason. The MSM really doesn’t show foot-shooting stuff like this toward either side of the spectrum, so… Moot.
Noooooeees!! It’s a librul conspricy!!1!
Look, folks, the straight truth in this matter is the mainstream media is not left-leaning or right-leaning, but dollar-leaning. Their only loyalties have been to their stockholders. Most of the standard news stations (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN) will pitch stories that are going to garner ratings. Close races are more watched than landslides.
When FoxNews came on the scene, Rupert Murdoch succeeded in blending journalism with punditry to the bastard result most Americans assume is what news is supposed to be. Rupie is a conservative, so he impressed a conservative agenda on the pundits. MSNBC decided to create the counter to FoxNews.
Hate to be the bucket of cold water waking people from a nice nap, but punditry has no place journalism. One is not meant to weasel one’s opinion into the news, nor is journalism intended to pander. All media is supposed to be “gotcha”. Its how we citizens are supposed to be able to check our politicians until election day.
Gotcha? Yeah, polititians are supposed to be accountable. “Infotainment” is such a bad concept. It had ruined news and journalism in general.
*buys min~ a beer & shot combo*
Drunk-o-posting!
Thanks man! I’ve been up for like 21 hours now. Not drunk, but giddy all the same.
Yeah MSNBC IS LIBERAL BUT THEY DON’T COME OUT WITH THIS BULLSHIT LIKE FOX NEWS THAT THEY ARE FAIR AND BALANCED. LOL THAT’S REALLY PATHETIC. ALL THEY DID FROM 4 IN THE MORNING UNTIL LATE AT NIGHT WAS ATTACK OBAMA. I THOUGHT GLENN BECK AND LOU DOBBS WERE HORRIBLE, WELL COMPARED TO SEAN HANNITY AND BILL O’REILY AND ALL THOSE DUMBASSES FROM THE STUPID COUCH THEY’RE ANGELS! BUT AS YOU CAN SEE BARACK OBAMA IS OUR PRESIDENT. GOD I WISH I COULD LAUGH IN SEAN HANNITY’S FACE!
Turn off the caps lock please… it makes you look like an idiot.
At least Fox News gives BOTH sides equal time,…. you’re on crack, right???? Since WHEN does fox give equal time???
Everyone once in a while, they do, when they need to bring on a leftie to talk over and interrupt.
Granted, given that definition of “fair and balanced”, MSNBC is just as bad…
The Right has Fox, the left has MSNBC… and except for an arrant shift one way or another, credible news sources are pretty evenly placed. I mean, I’ve heard claims that CNN is leftist, which is RIDICULOUS. It’s also hard to tell when these claims are being made about editorial pieces or actual news reports.
I dunno. I’m beginning to get the impression that it’s not so much a matter of whether a network is “left” or “right.” I get the impression that even moderate is too liberal for those among the right who claim they are being victimized by the media. It’s a complex issue, I’ll grant, but I’m not convinced.
CNN Pwns.
I love CNN’s fact check, which reminds us that they are all still politicians and they all still lie
BBC is the best for non-partisan, truthful news.
Uh, sorry – I’ll take my news a little closer to the source.. If anyone’s tampered with my news, or wants to put a spin on it, I prefer it be the evil plot of a fellow American – not an evil plot of a … BBC watching person.
I consider them the most reliable myself. And local news is good no matter where you’re from.
Unless your local news team consists of a bag of douches.
And yet most of the media is owned by conservatives. Hmm.
Exactly… I often have pondered the same question.
maybe the conservatives own them but they don’t pay attention to whom they’re hiring
Sure. That’s why McCain got a free 30 minutes on Larry King the night Obama had his psid 30 minutes on several networks. (Which CNN wouldn’t air)
This.
It isn’t. Just because most media is to the left of “neocon wingnut” does not make it left wing.
Exactly. I feel like what conservatives consider to be “unbiased” just means biased in their favor. Even moderate is too liberal, apparently.
That would be the “other media” that faithfully, almost sycophantically repeats “Ayers Resko Wright Whitey Muslim Inexperienced Increase Taxes” over and over and over again while making McCain look like the Messiah?
There are no liberal news stations in the US.
Not one.
Amen! I competely agree…all you liberals can have every other media outlet, let us have this one!
Umm… Then why are there two DEMOCRATS on that billboard?
O’Reilly weighs that out
It’s more along the lines of conservative/liberal than Republican/Democrat. Greta’s a Democrat, but she’s a conservative Democrat.
And who’s the guy second from the left that looks possessed?
That would be Shepherd Smith.
Fox loves to have its punching bags, centrist Democrats trotted out just to be shot down.
With Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity dead center, you could have Ted Kennedy, both Clintons, Barack Obama and Che Guevarra up there and the board would still slant to the right at least 70 degrees.
The democrats never get veto power over the microphones. The “conservatives” do. (Quotes, ’cause real conservatives hate the wingnut neocons!)
How many commentators and politicians of all stripe have to say that only Foxnews gave fair coverage to the DNC convention to wash the koolaid out of some democrats? Even your leaders agree that Foxnews is fair and balanced.
Sean Hannity there I disproved your argument you lose.
Fox News is actually news?? From this side of the pond I just assumed it was satire. That doesn’t bode well for tonight…
Well, it is satire – it just doesn’t know it is.
It’s the inspiration for the Colbert Report, which IS actually satire.
Then all the other news networks must be the satire that is the inspiration for Jon Stewart, which also is actually satire on the other side of the spectrum.
If only unbiased media actually existed any more…
Pretty much since the Daily Show came first. It was an attempt to poke fun at the super serious business 24 news channels and eventually did develop a bit of a left lean. Stephen Colbert played a classic “Fox News Pundit” against Steven Correl’s classic “Liberal Media Pundit”. Eventually, Colbert was given his own show.
CNN all the way baby
I’m a former journalist and university journalism instructor and my take on this “fair and balanced” palaver is that it’s just a tag line used to try put all the other news sources on the defensive. It has no meaning whatever as far as the actual content of the programming.
There is no legal requirement for “equal time,” nor, as far as I’m concerned, should there be. We have multiple news sources available to us in the US and we have access to foreign sources as well, in print, broadcast and online, so we can see hear and read multiple viewpoints on important issues.
I always told my students that “fair and balanced’ is nothing but a show business slogan…what a true journalist must do is dig for and analyze the facts and present them with clarity and honesty. That transcends viewpoint and politics. So-called “liberals” and so-called “conservatives” are both capable of incisive thought and intellectual honesty even though they come to different conclusions.
The problem is that people think “objective” means “shows both sides of an issue” rather than “shows the truth.” Unfortunately, true reporting–digging in and finding out the truth–isn’t flashy or visually intense, and the American public tends to respond better to conflict and noise and soundbites.
A really good thing to remember when watching TV is that the audience is the product. When you realize that shows primarily are crafted to bring in the most viewers, rather than to show the best content, it puts lots of things into perspective.
Hey! Who are these commies bringing facts and reason into this discussion?!?!?!?
Sure you are! A “university journalism instructor” is another name for a socialistic propaganda tool !
You are one of the bad “conservatives”: the kind that’s afraid of education.
So is “Minor” a clever disguise for “Miner”?
Well spoken. Very thoughtful.
Stoopid liberal humor.
Yeah. There seems to be way more of it on here than conservative humor. It’s bad marketing since there are plenty of conservatives on here waiting for anti-obama lolz
Isn’t this user-driven content?
If so, isn’t what you see here what the users themselves create? If you so-called conservatives can’t be bothered to create content, they have no cause to complain.
How exactly do we get lols we make to even show up on the voting page? I’ve made them before and submitted them but they never ever showed up for anyone to see. So they didn’t get voted on as good or bad.
I’ve created dozens of them. I’m no comedic genius, but you can’t tell me half of these anti-Palin lolz are even close to funny. Some are just digustingly sexist and sad.
They’re created and voted on by users. The anti-Obama lols either aren’t that funny, or they’re not being voted on by all those conservatives that want them.
Most humour probably seems stupid to you, seeing as we’ve already established in the Epoch Fail comments that you’re incapable of understanding even simple comedy techniques such as puns.
Except this caption isn’t a pun. Its a joke older then McCain and lamer than an Obama excuse.
*than
Read my comment again. We found out in the comments of a lol that WAS a pun that Pirate77 couldn’t grasp them.
Ok, as far as NEWS coverage, they ARE fair and balanced. As far as TALK shows like Douchebag and Colms and O’Yelly Factor, they are horribly slanted.
Who else voted today? WOOT WOOT, HOLLA.
I voted a week ago.
I stuck my early ballot in the box last night.
Then go back and vote again for me !
Not funny – as apparently, it’s happening….
OH? where? I’m sure you have much evidence for this.
/Nod
Liberal tears… it sustains me.
The only liberal tears you’re going to see tonight are tears of joy…
Don’t zip up before you’re done. You may end up pissing yourself.
My guess is it will be a landslide that leaves Democrats solidly in control of congress, a supermajority in the senate, the presidency, and a clear mandate from the people. I guess we’ll see, won’t we? Finally.
A very common mistake is to assume knee-jerk voting is a “mandate” from the people. It isn’t. Often times it’s an attempt to prevent something else, not to authorize the only other option they had. I hope to God we don’t get the House, Senate, and Presidency all of one party or the other. They need to keep each other too tied up to mess up our lives.
As an outrageous example to show my point: Imagaine 2 candidates, A and B. Candidate A runs on a platform of “I like eating babies”. Candidate B runs on a platform of “I like kicking babies”. If Candidate B wins in a landslide it’s not a mandate from the people that kicking babies is ok. It’s just the lesser of the two evils. But that’s *not* what the politicians or media will tell you.
That’s not fair, kicking babies is horribly worse, that’s just a waste of good meat.
We do not need an ineffective, ‘tied up’ government at this juncture. We need swift, decisive action to fix the horrible mess eight years of Bush and trickle down economics have gotten us into.
If you don’t keep the government tied up, they’ll ram all sorts of stupid programs down your throat and you won’t even know about half of them. You need the second party to keep them honest. Even that doesn’t always work. If one party gets full control it’ll be pet projects out the wazoo. They might even forget they have actual work to be doing.
That is your opinion. As I have stated, my opinion is that we need decisive action to fix the mistakes of the last eight years. Government is NOT always bad. It is only bad when controlled by people who think that government is always bad.
As long as the decisive action is the right action to take and not a huge mistake in the other direction. Businesses and free markets are not always bad either. Time will tell I suppose.
No fair – you got your post to go where it was supposed to. ;P
Lol! But at least I agree with you!
Conservatives believe all government is bad and inefficient, and when they get elected, they endeavor to prove it.
Wait a minute. Republicans/Conservatives thought that one party holding Congress and the presidency was Just Fine up until 2006 when they lost it.
Exactly. And look at all the garbage that went on when one party controlled the House, Senate, and the White House.
Sounds like fascism!
Screw minority rights. Screw checks and balances!
I want socialism! I want a civilian cult!
I’m right, and you’ll damn well abide by my rule!
Dude, re-read some John Adams.
Ummmmmm, Seth actually does want socialism. I’m not sure this is an insult to him. I’d have to check with him about the others though.
And it looks like Al Franken is going to win here. Al Damn Franken. Wow.
I was amused at some of the names on the ballot I hadn’t even heard of. There was even a Constitutional Party. Nice sounding name. Gonna have to see what they’re about.
We have one called Working Families in NY. Not sure if they are everywhere or not.
It’s pretty much about what you would think it’s about: protecting the constitution.
Let me rephrase, they’re for restoring the constitution.
“The Constitution Party’s third party conservative political platform is focused on restoring the Federal Government to the Constitution’s provisions..”
-
“The Constitution Party advocates a platform which aims to reflect the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights.”
I hope to God I can tune into Fox in time to hear O’Reilly say “Al Franken won his seat in the Senate” and then see his head explode.
If you’re lucky enough to get him as your senator, I’ll bet you a dollar that in six years, you’ll quietly be saying, “Stupid Al Franken, always making things better so my republican candidate can’t get elected!”
If you’re dumb enough to elect him– you deserve him.
Probably not, but you’re right: too soon to start the party.
^^^ Wow it’s ironic that my name is so similar to Sig’s.
Thisposterdidn’tneedacaption/10
The Whitey Network, now with Token Female!
Here’s your $50 for posting that !
My ex-friend (11 years of friendship gone because of an election) tried to tell me that Fox News isn’t Right Wing. I was like ‘WUT?’
I’m sorry to hear that. I hope you all can mend fences someday.
Is his name Anti-Seth ?
We’re gonna have to agree to disagree on this one I think. I don’t see any way a single party (either one) with no opposition will make the correct decisive actions. They’ll make actions alright. Lots of them. But with no one making them have to *think* about their choices, they’ll have the freedom to throw whatever they want up against the wall and see what sticks. To me that means a *lot* of unneccesary government action, and the government isn’t known for giving out *more* liberties. Only taking them away. And if they don’t think a decision through but just act because they can, they can do far more harm than good.
I have had my lols on the voting page, they just got voted down. But I’m ok with that, at least I tried. But teebird is right, this site is user-driven.
(In case this doesn’t nest – this is in respone to eddiepscetti.)
.
I’ve never managed to get them to the vote page so they can be voted down (or up! 8D ). Is there something special you need to do?
Nope, nothing special. You know they make it to the voting page if you get a confirmation e-mail thanking you for the lol.
-
On a side note, PK is obviously having issues with posting as I usually get a default for my name, e-mail, and URI but they aren’t appearing. Hope they fix that soon!
It’s not 100% user driven, but I believe it is close…
Sorry, I should have qualified that by saying as far as the voting is concerned. It doesn’t always mean your lol will hit the front page, but at least we still get to vote..
For the record, none of mine have ever made the front page either. I’m not certain that “bias” is the only criterion for posting.
I did, however, make the coming soon page once! I sure felt like a winner that day!
I typed out a response but PK ate it. I’ll wait a bit to see if it comes back.
My comments are being eaten, too. Is word press hungry today????
Well, my response came back, but it refused to nest. This should be under Seth’s comment up above. And it probably will be there later knowing PK. ;P
Seth, I don’t disagree with you about cleaning up the mess, but what blah is saying is valid. If you have every branch of government controlled by one party, you then have the possibility of having an abuse of that majority. Also, just because the Democrats think their way is the best way doesn’t necessarily make it so.
I’ll take that chance. We need a strong central government right now. What some see as abuse, I see as justice.
Would you say the same if it was Republicans in charge of everything?
Would you ask that question eight years ago?
I’m going to assume that was an honest question, though it does sound more like a flippant put-off to me. For the record mine was an honest question as well. As to the answer:
.
I don’t know. If I knew then what I know now, then yes. I don’t think *either* party does well when left to it’s own devices. I was still a dumb college student 8 years ago, and pretty much apolitical, so my thoughts at that point really have no bearing on anything today. Politics just didn’t seem so important back then. Not as much as a 2 a.m. hockey game. ;P
Thanks for your response. I thought YOU were being flip.
Nope. There’s that darn internet/type thing again. ;D I’ve just been rather introspective the last couplea days. Even came up with an interesting analogy to explain why things in Washington don’t work, then came to find out someone I’d never heard of had written a book about the almost exact thing.
Nope. Republicans believe that government doesn’t work, and every time they gain power, they prove it by screwing things up. We need solid control by people who believe that government works, which is thankfully what we are about to have.
Republicans *know* how government can work, which is why they don’t trust it. And one of the big problems is the Republican rhinos that’re basically Democrats-in-disguise. It’s one thing to *say* you’re a conservative, and another entirely to act like one. One party with full control, Democrat or Republican, *will* use the opportunity to get their corrupt little plans through that’d never happen if you had both parties having to work together. What we need is new blood in Washington. One way or the other, Obama or Palin, we’ll get a little. But we need more. Especially the congressional lifers that have no clue how the real world works. Time to just vote out the incumbents and start with new, hopefully less corrupt, people of both parties.
As long as the lobbyists are there handing out bagfuls of cash and calling it free speech, the new blood will inevitably become corrupt.
I’m fine with getting rid of them too.
Eddie: Usually I would agree with you, but I think this country needs a few years of democratic dominance to get us out of the crises (plural?) we’re in. We can start sharing again in four, or six, or eight years, thank you.
I laugh out loud at this billboard every time I walk down 7th Avenue. Srsly.
Please look at the facts, people.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hiE-7-7YbMg-msHxLrN2b_g8RF7gD945QUT81
I trust the Associated Press, but since it disagrees with you, you will denounce it. What is says: Liberal slant, and the most balanced station was fox news.
Please, please stop posting and upvoting false pictures/captions.
My name for an article by the same person.
just because fox is not run by a buch of commies who are completely democratic, doen’t mean it favor repulicans.
Maybe not, but come on, it’s right there. You can put a dress on a pig but it’s still a pig.
Don’t you mean lipstick?
you seem to portray the demgraphics that watches that station…fortunately for the rest of us your numbers are dwindling…
I wish Bill O’Reilly would meet his maker earlier rather than later and preferably painfully.
add this to the fail blog…
where are the black guys??? you call that fair and balanced???????
idiots
Juan Williams, Mark Lemont Hill, Angela McGlowan, Sherod Smalls not to mention many other regular fox news contributors.
Yet none are on the billboard.
(Fox news lover, ahoy.)
Let’s be honest with ourselves. Fox is not fair and balanced.
Every woman on there who gets more than thirty seconds of airtime is a blonde.
No, seriously.
what a disgusting line-up of rhetoric-bashing demonspawn
Where is my third party media network?
Yet I’m sure you all think CNN is “fair and balanced” as well. Yes Fox News is generally conservative and yes CNN is generally liberal. However, Fox News seems to stand out more to you people because every other news station is overwhelmingly liberal in nature. That’s simply how the media is nowadays and that makes it a hell of a lot harder for people with common sense (read: conservatives) to deliver a story filled with truthiness.
Media Studies Fail.
If the hypocrisy of liberals on this issue was mass, they’d form several black holes.
Fox is SUCH a terrible network for merely permitting conservatives to speak and be heard, but networks like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, PBS, CNBC, MSNBC, etc. are legit, objective, neutral, and are merely observing and reporting events.
Liberal Americans: The Stalinist media just completed the engineering of a presidential election. Meanwhile some still have the gall to mention Fox.
Also, to post this on election day is really without class.
You have to work on your sweding…plus…not that funny. Now if you did something with greta and ann coulter discussing who looked and/or was more of a man then it would be hysterical.
The last thing FOX News is is a news station….
OMG, YES! this is soo f*cking true! Fox News is the most biased and unfair news network in the world. look at the Fox Attacks: Barack Obama videos, and you’ll see what i mean
I only ever watched fox news, even before I decided who I was voting for.
Unlike CNN and MSNBC they actually gave the republican party AND democratic party equal coverage.
I want to see every party answer hard questions. Not see a news organization critisized for asking them.
I concur! The only reason the Radical Left hates Fox News is because they *are* fair and balanced. When they’re critical, they are critical of both Democrats and Republicans. CNN, MSNBC, and the broadcast networks, only seems “fair and balanced” to those on the extreme left because CNN, et al., are also far to the left.
Okay, the talking head opinion shows may not be “fair and balanced”, but they balance the lefty drivel from CNN and MSNBC and Oprah. We don’t need to balance Bill O’Reilly. He *is* the balance for Keith Oberman.
its ok if fox is really right wing, this website overly compensates for it in its linberal shit
It’s not only if your a republican it’s only if you actually pay attention to the issues and care about what happens to America!
By fair and balanced you mean that Bill O and Hannity make Nancy Grace seem like a balanced, polite commentator, than sure.
As for FOX NEWS, I watch it to see what the other side says along with MSNBC and CNN. Here’s a news flash: EVERYONE THINKS THEY’RE RIGHT!!11 I believe it all lies in the discussions and interviewing techniques that are presented every night as opposed to the shouting, interupting, downright mudslinging dickery that happens primarily on FOX.
this picture doesn’t even need a caption to be funny.