Shhhh…be…completely… still…Cheney’s over there…behind the rose bush…with a shotgun…
(Barck Obama, George Bush)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Ahoy_Polloi
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous I can’t wait to get rid of this hideous f@$#ing chair… | Any last words FOX? Next »
Shhhh…be…completely… still…Cheney’s over there…behind the rose bush…with a shotgun…
(Barck Obama, George Bush)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Ahoy_Polloi
FIRST!!! lol
F*cking
Assh*le
Is
Lame
Here, let me explain it to him.
This Lol is funny because Cheney shot some guy in the face while hunting, now Bush is afraid that Cheney will shoot either Obama or himself in the face with said shotgun.
Here, let me explain it to you
qwertydude’s comment was not about the LOL but about Flump and his stupid “first” comment.
I know, but I though the First! poster needed a little explanation, considering they posted something with absolutely no relevance.
It was my attempt at being a condescending prick, apparently I need more practice…
So get your prick and start practicing dammit!!!
DWM, leave his prick alone!
Hmm, am I missing something interesting?
Can we watch?
No worries, Cheney can’t hit shit, anyway.
Mmm… If Cheney’s aiming at something else I’d be nervous. He seems to be one that oughtn’t to aim AT what he wants to hit.
Huzzah! In *gag* Cheney’s defense, the victim was a *lawyer.*
What’s the difference between finding a roadkill raccoon and a roadkill lawyer?
There are brake marks at the raccoon.
….
I applied to study law actually….
So his aim was good
Let’s just say it wasn’t a terrible shame.
I totally got your intent in the first place, so you’re a better prick than you thought, yes?
I find that it’s helpful to start in small steps and work up from there. Try being a condescending snot-nose at first, and see how that goes.
Ok. It didn’t come across that way to me b/c your comment was nested under qwertydude’s comment rather than Flump’s.
Seemed apparent to me since he said “Let me explain it to him” and not “Let me explain it to YOU”.
Re-read Cobrajoe’s comment. He is talking *to* qwertydude *about* Flump, yes?
you can see that whatever qwertydude said abbreviates “fail”
muahaha…
I think it’s neat that the caption goes so well with both facial expressions.
Yup, Obama looks like he’s thinking “Huh. Stalked by a Dark Lord of the Sith, never saw THAT coming!” while Bush is like, “Damn, not this again.”
LOL–I had a different take, with Obama thinking “WTF?” and Bush thinking “My underwear hurts.”
LOL
Tighty Wighty, not so good actually.
LOL–That would be a great caption for ICHC!
All that creeping around in barrows and scaring people, I hate wights. Does that make me racist?
Speciest? I don’t know, since wights are former humans (kings aren’t they?) can we still consider them the same?
Ack, never mind, I fail, I was think wraiths, as in ringwraiths. Damn it.
Oh, and I lol’d btw.
LOL Literally.
Me too. I was cracking up- my underwear hurts! Classy!
What? Can you say that again?
Gotta watch out for that Darth Cheney. You know, some say that Bush is going to maybe pardon himself, Cheney, etc. before he leaves office? If anything’s unconstitutional, that is.
Nope. They’ll be hung out to dry.
By a rope. In the Conservatory. With Colonel Mustard.
*guffaws* *loses balance* *falls back* *hits head on lead pipe* *in the library* *with Uncle Fester* Wait–that doesn’t seem right, somehow.
In..bed…??
No, no no. By a Candlestick. In the Billiards Room. By Professor Plum.
Thats my accusation, at least.
They can still be prosecuted for war crimes (like torture) under International Law once they’re out of office. Refer to a new book entitled “The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld”.
Assuming they leave the country again.
The common wisdom has it that Bush has purchased a great swath of land in Paraguay, which has no extradition treaty with the United States. I make no claim as to the validity of the common wisdom, but it does make an interesting tale.
I wish I could afford a Paraguayan bolt-hole in case things go sour…
The South American continent worked as a bolt hole Odessa and a bunch of Grandpa Bush’s mates afrer WW2, so he’ll have friends
Heh heh. You said “bolt-hole”.
LOL
I remember an American bought a bunch of land in South America to make a sanctuary. His name was Jim Jones, and his plan didn’t work out so much…
now I want Kool-aid
*gives allikf KoolAid*
Mmmmm cherry…wait why does it tast of almonds?
Die with some dignity, allikf!
Babe… cyanide is so yuck. Can we usw Iocaine Powder instead?
But I’ve spent the last several years building up an immunity to Iocaine powder!
As you wish.
Uh…leeedle late for suggestion, awchually…
OH YEAH!
i put 3 lemonade kool aid’s in a drink never do that its to sour WAAAAAAAY to sour
Also check out “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” by Vincent Bugliosi (Charles Manson prosecutor). His theory is that if Bill Clinton could be impeached for lying about sex with an intern, then George W. should be impeached for lying the country into war (the author’s words, paraphrased).
I’m having “Deja Moo”- it seems I’ve heard this bull before!
Or, “The Trial of George W. Bush for Murder” written by the prosecutor who put away Charles Manson for life.
There is legal precedent for extending executive privelege beyond the actual term of office. It would be interesting to watch a legal battle play out, but it’s not going to happen.
I’m sure Seth would go nuts if bush was found for something and Barack pardoned him.
Aye, just as many a conservative would go nuts if Bush gave in and announced that Iran should be allowed to have nukes. Both scenarios would be completely out of character for each man, and both scenarios are equally likely.
Still, if your scenario came true, Seth would be perfectly entitled to hold Obama to account for the betrayal.
Not really. It may come as a surprise, but I consider Obama to be in the ‘lesser of two evils’ category rather than the ‘heroic savior’ category. He is part of the same Corporatist government that both mainstream parties are semi-secretly members of. I think of the Democrat and Republican parties as the good cop/bad cop combo the rich use to screw us all. You’ll be seeing a lot more of that side of me now that the election is over.
I agree. He’s far from being the Christchild, nor is he the antichrist. He beats the hell outta having Palin way up there on the food chain, though.
The Anti-Christ would be liked by everyone (Obama got elected by like 52% or something, so not liked by everyone)
Most of the civilized world likes Obama, to the tune of like 80%. He’s not the AntiChrist though. Common views hold that the AntiChrist will be Italian, or more specifically Roman.
Either that or a Texan.
But only if he’s from Lubbock or Amarillo.. my bet is on Amarillo.
I know, i drive through there every summer on my way to NM and back, its gotaa be where Texans send their rejects.
Is this about the time you and Mom have your obligatory “gas fight”?
As a native Texan, I can verify that all of our rejects are, indeed, sent to Amarillo, with a few located in surrounding suburbs.
Or to Minnesota- to vote for Al Frankin.
Native New Mexican here.. The thing about Amarillo is, you can see it from 60 miles away, but you pick up the smell at 80..
LMAO!!
Amarillo is more likely, but I have an ex in Lubbock.
Va’fan’cul! I mean, dammit! I mean, oh really?, that’s interesting.
[combs bangs to cover horn buds]
And that everyone would like him. And Obama got elected by like 52% or something.
oh crap, didn’t I just say this before?
I like your interpretation…
Personally, I put both parties under the same banner:
“The United Party of Capitalism”
I’m paraphrasing, but I remember Bill Maher once said, “The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats have a slightly less scary group of lobbyests.”
Stole the words out of my mouth Seth.
Paranoid much, Seth? That whole Tri-Lateral Commission thing, maybe?
No politician is to be trusted. To paraphrase the late great Douglas Adams, no one who WANTS to be President should BE President! Which explains why a two-headed twit became President of the Galaxy…but I digress. Frequently.
this seems almost racist to me. The assumption that Bush and Chaney want ot kill Obama because he is black.
Didn’t catch the Cheney quail hunting debacle, eh?
Heck, I remember the Mad magazine cover for that incident.
William, are you kidding?
I might be giving too much credit, but surely he is kidding.
*sigh* Must. Resist. The. Need. To. Lecture.
ah g’wan, shure you know you want to.
Hey, where’ve you been!? We could’ve used your help a few threads ago!
She made it back there, and gave us all a throttlin’. *rubs backside*
Rhorho, do explain to the rest of us how she managed to throttle
your backside. . .
It was just a joke. We wanted her help, but she was unavailable for comment. (Something about a J-O-B she had to do.) We tried to fill in for her, but only managed to say something weak.
Very carefully. In bed..
Very carefully. In bed..
You usually indulge it… what’s new on this thread?
Unc, I *told* you to say “red pill.” Why didn’t you listen? Now you can’t see the Matrix, and you want all of us to explain it to you… *sigh*
No, I want to know why the Thought Police is holding back on this numpty when short of clubbing her to unconsciousness you can’t usually stop her…
And it’s less the Matrix and more Wonderland, just with less inherent sense.
What did you say? I can’t really understand whine-ese
Seriously, Unc, why are you being so snarky lately? It’s starting to get really annoying…
Because I told him to stop acting like a child and he didn’t like it, so now he’s going to post stalk me instead of froofrou.
So we’re having trouble playing nice?
Uncle Fester is, I didn’t even call him any names, I just told him to lay off froofrou for awhile, now he’s going all megabob on me. I swear, some people need to get out more.
*sigh* Why can’t everyone just play nice? Will brownies help? *offers brownies*
*Eyes brownies suspiciously* Is there pot in these brownies?
If there is, will you have extra?
If there is, everybody may indeed get along better…
That’s what I’m thinking.
*Gobbles 3 brownies, on the chance they may be the good kind*
Oh! I want some! Me! Me! Pick Me!!!11eleventy!
*scarfs brownie* Try them and find out! ;D
As a “I know the secret handshake so there” member of the Thought Police, I must officially request that you reread the post in question. The guy is wrong, but not a troll. Wrong is usually let go/ignored. This guy was sooooo wrong that Jane’s thrown into a dilhemma. Still, as wrong as he is, he deserves to be spared.
Knock wood, but have you noticed fewer trolls today? I’m thinking today was some sort of troll holiday, so only the trolls with low-end jobs came out. The ones I discovered were quashed easily. Gratifying, yes, but now I feel like a soldier without a war. It ain’t easy bein’ polizzy!
Rhorho, I don’t think you realize that UF was not making a comment about the trollness of the poster, but sneaking in a snide insult to me.
Are you sure he isn’t just kidding? If you read his words with a fun spin, it sounds like he’s admiring your moxy (sp), as do I. I hope you don’t think I ever meant anything un-fun towards you. I like you both.
I’m thinking Jane is right.. sort of like UF tossing the hypocrite comment? The comment was snide adn undeserving. From what I have seen, UF really does like to start bagging on people in an effort to get a rise out them – and not in a good way.
I agree that calling you a hypocrite was wrong. He should have asked you to clarify. Your statement was easy to misunderstand, but, even though I misunderstood it, my reaction was “WTF?”, not “attack–no holds barred!” I’m not saying I’m right, but, in a way, I am. I’ve known you for less time than Unc has, but I know an inconsistency when I see one. Having said that, I’m going to give him a day, “hide and watch,” (TX phrase) and hope he smoothes back down.
No, his history of calling my opinion worthless in a previous thread because he was harrassing froofrou and I told him to lay off supports my assessment.
I want you to know that I’m not ignoring you. I simply don’t know what to say. I didn’t see the posts, so I’m keeping my nose out of that business. I don’t know who drew first blood, why, et c. In most cases, I respond to good comments, and ignore bad comments. That policy works for me. (Of course, you know I have a b-it-ch slap in me, but that’s reserved for special occasions.
)
your comment has FAIL
Your comment was MEAN.
O’ RLY?
Yes, RLY.
How exactly? William said that the caption seemed racist, when it’s obviously a refferance to when Cheny shot his friend in the face. How is calling Will on his failure to know current events mean? Everyone else here is being critical of Will’s comment.
Okay, how about this way:
William, I totally disagree. I think this is a reference to the time when Dick Cheney shot his lawyer friend during a hunting trip.
or I could just type FAIL
so much easier
Yes, but this is an LOL site, meant to be fun. William isn’t a troll, so no need to attack. Besides, if Jane gives in to temptation, you can save yourself a lot of typing, anyway.
So it’s ok for Jane to go off on him?
She’s resisting. So far, so good.
Resisting, working my second job… well the end result is the same. Also, I’ve been working for about 13 hours now and I’m too tired. *snore*
Well I will say this in comment cop’s defense. William made a completely baseless assumption. How do I know this? I read the captions, reading comprehension tells me that Bush is more afraid than Obama and is warning him. Thus any racial assumptions are made up by the reader.
Thus William earned his fail. There wasn’t a racist statement to be had and if there was, it was only because the viewer brought their own baggage to the LOL or simply failed at reading.
I hate to argue with the birthday boy, but “This seems almost racist to me” isn’t emphatic enough to earn fail. Enlighten William, and he’ll learn, and change his thought direction. Call him fail, and he goes away thinking the threads are full of bigots. Conversely, if William had trolled off on us, we would unleash The Jane and pot shot at will.
Usually takes three strikes for my unpleasantness glands to kick in on people…
once is chance, twice unfortunate, three times and they’re doing that crap on purpose…
ATM William is at strike 1
I like your style, Unc!
NO WAI! (Sorry, couldn’t resist…
)
O RLY O’ReiLY?
*SNORK!!* :LOL:
YA WAI!
(Resist nothing. I was expecting it, and if you didn’t do I would have.
If I had thought of it, I would have gone sock for that one–GOOD CALL!
I think it’s the idea that Cheney will shoot anything that moves…
I still like it that the guy he shot ended up apologising to the Prince of Darkness… now that is the Dark Side at work…
I don’t usually do this, but, *gag* in Cheney’s defense *gag*, the guy evidently violated some sort of hunting rule. I don’t remember what the name of the rule was, but, at the time, I likened it to being “off sides.”
However, Cheney violated hunting rule #1: ALWAYS know what you’re shooting at.
“Cheney violated hunting rule #1: ALWAYS know what you’re shooting at”
Uh, yeah, he didn’t know… THAT’s the ticket!
I think the rule was ‘getting in front of a guy shooting’… he was lucky it was quali and not deer… expanding rounds are hard on the tweeds…
LMAO! *checks bra for extra hollow points* I don’t think the guy was directly in front of Cheney, but was off to the side somewhere? Oh, who am I kidding? I think the guy was lying about being in the wrong place, anyway!
Indeed… but to get scatter shot like that you have to be a way in front, while not necessarily being in the direct line of fire (it’s a long time since I used a shot gun in anger, but I think the ‘ballistics’ is more like the behaviour of hyperbolic ly deformed cones)
When you fire a shotgun, the normal hunting rules dont always apply because there is a scatter at play instead of a simple straight line. If you are with someone using a shotgun, you stand to the side AND behind, not just to the side. I think both of them were doing it wrong because Cheney should have verified were everyone was.
*hugs* That’s exactly what I was trying to remember!
Please forgive the spelling in that last post. L dont have a computer where i am and cant type like i’m used to
The guy was at Cheney’s side, and Cheney shot sideways, after having followed the flight of the bird with his aim.
So, the rule he broke was standing next to a dipshit with a gun…
ROFL! The sheet’s getting deep! I’ve been on a dove hunt. It’s pretty straightforward: Don’t shoot if you don’t know where everybody is, and don’t move without letting *people with loaded weapons* know your new position. Perhaps quail hunting is more complicated than that. *smirk* At the time of the initial reporting, mention was made of beer consumed at lunch.
Beer?? Sheesh! When I was a re-enactor (and this was loading only
gunpowder and not lead shot) we weren’t allowed within sniffing
distance of alcohol before a display!
Well, the people who ran the hunting lodge said that Cheney’s tab showed only one beer. However, what is the lodge’s motivation to lose a powerful customer and face the legal ramifications of serving too much alcohol to a hunter?
.
I’m still laughing about this, because I had forgotten a lot of the details since the time. Uncle Fester reminded me that, shortly after his release from the hospital, the victim held a press conference to apologize for the accident. I’m sure he apologized for fear that Cheney would go all I-find-your-lack-of-faith-disturbing on him!
.
Ah, the good ol’ days!
And the poor victim had to stay extra at the hospital, because the stress of getting shot had triggered a modest heart attack. And yet he apologizes to Cheney?!?! Maybe Cheney really is Sith?
Yes, but only on his mother’s side.
You have GOT to be kidding. Get back under your rock and leave us alone.
carful rhorho will call you mean.
She often tells me I am… I ignore it…
… (*ignoring you!*) …
Oh thanks, CC. I missed this one.
.
ICDK, you’re going to be nicer to people from now on, aren’t you?
Yes, my friend CC is right. I’m afraid you could have put that in a nicer way. If you’ll notice, other people have already explained the situation calmly and sensibly, the way grown-ups do.
told you
I liked you better when you were that cute “Home Alone” kid.
Ok I completely missed that reference.
(Hmmm. Do I say FAIL and make him feel bad, or do I explain…?)
Come to the dark side… we have pink toaster ovens…
Sure, as long as they’re pink! *Grabs wind breaker, trudges after Uncle Fester*
*voice fainter, and fading still* How’d ya know I like pink?
The power of the Dark Side…
Do they have hello kitty on them???
No but I’ve seen a Hello Kitty AK…
Man, I totally want one.
Won’t make me feel bad in the least. I fully admit FAIL on my part for that one. I still don’t know what on earth you were talking about.
I still think it’s funny that you consider the use of FAIL as some sort of horrible mean comment on a site with a page called FAIL BLOG.
That would work, if *this* were fail blog. It’s tiring to see “fail” written all over a thread, more annoying as the “first” and “sacked” comments out of sheer volume.
.
“I liked you better when you were that cute ‘Home Alone’ kid” means that your comments put your age at prepubescent: no longer a cute kid, but not mature, either.
William, William, you pot-stirrer, you…waiting to see what floats to the top, eh?
Made of WIN! I’ll be glad when Chey… Bush is no longer president.
LOL!
Whoa. I lol’ed on Pundit Kitchen! Love it when they’re actually funny.
Rare but funny !
LOL! And if he misses, Darth Cheney can just choke you with his mind…”I find your lack of faith disturbing.”
I find his abundance of fail disturbing.
Darth Cheney: The ability to invade Iraq, is insignificant next to the power of Shooting Someone’s Face Off.
He can smell fear, you know.
Hopefully Cheney gets both of them and then the gun misfires killing him.
So … um … after reading all the comments, I just wanted to say: I thought this one was pretty funny.
i would suggest you remove this item and others like it immediately
it is in bad taste, despite any attempt at humor
see link
get over yourself. This was poking at Cheney, not implying any particular threat to Obama.
Link, shtink…nobody’s gonna get near the AntiChr–, I mean the President-Elect. Except maybe everyone who voted for him thinking he’s going to (Yes We Can) Change Things, after they realize he’s going to screw them. Boys and girls, BH Obama is a politician and he ain’t thinkin’ about the little people, ya dig?
Ooh, this one was funny.
lol dick cheney (or as i like to call him DICK cheney) shot someone in the face i get it!!!!!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!