Is that the Constitution in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
(Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: meanmelissa
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous I’m so glad the Civil Rights Movement made it possible | The “Bush Doctrine” in a nutshell Next »
Is that the Constitution in your pocket…
» 220 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
InGen Corp. on The Running Man The Dragon on Osombie InGen Corp. on Time to Get FLOTUS Fit InGen Corp. on Who You Gonna Call? Battle Scarred on Go Sieg Heil Yourself RS on Am I Doing This Right? Herman the German on How Far We Haven’t … MrsQ of Philly on Go Sieg Heil Yourself MrsQ of Philly on Keeping the Internet Hone… neoritter on Keeping the Internet Hone… 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
GIF: I Meant to Do That!
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Spreadsheet Hell
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
He Must Ride the Love Rollercoaster A Lot
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Great Escape
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Nom Distraction
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Reader Squees: Camera Hoggin' G-Peeg
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
Socially Awkward Gentlemen
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Slurm! It's Highly Addictive!
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Curse You, Spam Mail!
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
THE JOKE'S ON HIM
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Tom Hiddleston Totally Looks Like Young Robert Englund
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Epicute: Red Velvet and Pink Hot Chocolate
Hmm. Quite a thought provoking photo.
I have wondered what was going on here myself…
I know… They look smitten.
Now this is funny!
I’m glad it’s Rahm, Pelosi just weirds me out!
But eddie…she’s the Democratic Palin, think of the next few years of Pelosi HOT–NESS!!!
Oh God, now I need brain AND eye bleach! Make it stop, make it stop!
Not yet!!! Wait… just picture her (as a grandma) in her fluffy bustier, with little bunnies (strategically placed) and her fluffy slippers, sliding into your vision, her voice lowered in a sultry manner, saying “eddie, you’ve been a BAD republican, I’m her to CHANGE YOU…”
Sorry, that’s Change I Can’t Believe In! I’d rather have my eyes put out with a red hot poker.. in fact, I think will have to start now!
You thought about it…I know that you did!
( drools……Mmmmm…Pelosi !)
could be worse…we could be seeing Palin all over the news…
But Pelosi is HOT!!!
For the record, Al doesn’t care too much for Pelosi, judging from the things he said when he was still on the air. I’m just sayin’.
His mouth says one thing, and his pocket constitution says another
They wouldn’t know the constitution if it walked up to them and said, “Hi. I’m the constitution.”
I’m afraid most Americans wouldn’t…which is why they let the government get away with as much as it does.
*deep breath*
…
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*gasp gasp gasp*
AAAaaaaAaAaaAaAaaaaaaahhhhhhhhaahhahaahhaaahh….
*turns blue and dies twitching*
DWM, where’s your wang now?
The azis stowed it deep in the basement of the Reichstaag.
next to Nancy?
No, IN Nancy!
My wang has turtled and will be seeking fortifications soon. My underwear shall become uncomfortable.
I’ve changed my mind. Please forget I ever claimed relationship to you.
Good girl!
Wait a minute, she looks smitten, he looks like a tease.
He is.
Poor Nancy! He’s just using her to make me jealous. …tsk…tsk
me too
*sigh*
Suppressing a gag reflex, myself…
I’m gonna have horrible nightmares.
BLEAAAGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!
Recall the picture of McCain horking something up..
There were >20 of those. Could you be more specific?
Anyone will do.. I was just going for the visual..
LOL! Eds, you should practice that move. Evidently it works on heiresses.
Ouch!
Looking h-h-h-a-w-t, Eds! (Maybe a little jaundiced, tho…)
Not too well since Cindy has apparently been banging a used car salesman for the past 3 years.
O…..O….O…O..O.O.O.O.O.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Oh come on…we all know those two have no idea what the Constitution is…
LOL, how true.
Dude, no. eww
I’m quite sure it’s just the Constitution…. *shudders*
We the people…
Wee the pee pole?
And how fitting is it his name is Rahm?
He’s a muslin tourist… wait that’s already been worn out.
The constitution? A piece of paper? Not much of a compliment…
The constitution is about 28 by 23 inches. Roll it into a tube, and… O_O
Most of the time it’s flat…
And it’s old, might dissintegrate too…
The Constitution, or Pelosi?
Yes.
Win.
^Agreed
Lol! I guess if you roll it… Might be a little thin though.
Eww this is just wrong…
hott!
or not.
NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT!!
if you put that backwards it spells TON, TON, TON, TON, TON of congressional fun…REPRESENT!
HOLLA!
Oh, my ~~~~~~~
brain bleasch XP
Ew. Just… Ew.
Is that a pearl necklace around your neck or . . .
uh, never mind.
lol
What a great idea for a B-reel horror flick.
heh, Pelosi’s hot for a 68-year-old, a lovely lady
Agreed. When I’m 85, I hope all my lady friends will be so hot
( sticks red hot poker in eyes to stop disturbing image!)
for the first time i wish i was an old broad, just so i can be that close to him..
that is A) the grossest thing I have heard all week and B) the gayest thing I have heard all week
It would only be gay if the poster is male. They didn’t indicate one way or the other.
no its gay either way because its gay. regardless of gender that is just a downright gay comment!
You use that word as if it were an insult. It isn’t.
I always wondered: how did “gay” go from meaning “happy” to meaning “homosexual”?
I really don’t want to type “gay” into google….
I believe it was in the 20s or 10s — the code was (IIRC) that they were “happy” to meet another of similar interests.
The phrase “gay” to mean “homosexual” was under the radar for many years; interestingly what began a witty in-joke in the 1938 movie “Bringing Up Baby” in which Cary Grant is asked why he’s wearing a woman’s bathrobe and he replies that he’s “decided to be *gay* all of a sudden!” now often goes unnoticed for the entendre that it was.
PK eating my links again. Sigh. I have a link that explains this. It may eventually turn up in it’s original form. Try this one.
10Q m’dear.
What so many people aphoristically forget is that while curiosity may have killed the cat, satisfaction brought it back.
I’m a huge nerd. If an interesting question is brought up, I try to find an answer.
As do I. *motions to post below*
Oh, right. Good one! LOL. Per Seth, “Wonder Dork Powers, Activate! Form of obscure etymology!”
Bundle of sticks, bundle of summin’summin’? Eh, eh? ;D
Nudge, nudge; wink, wink; say no more.
Or cigarette in the UK.
I think it’s because some folk like to burn both. I’m just sayin’.
Gay Is Not a Synonym For Shitty.
Oh god, I’m quoting Fall Out Boy song titles on PunditKitchen…somebody shoot me.
Pew Pew Pew!!!!!!!
On the other hand, can be so sure Pelosi is what she(?) protrays herself(?) to be?
It’s okay to be bi-curious, Eds. If you want to be more confident in your mixed feelings, I think Anne Coulter might be a safer bet, though.
Ouch! That was undeserved!
Oh, so you’re bi-partisan bi-curious?
Now *that’s* curious!! : )
wow. that just made me throw up in my mouth a bit.
I am a 23 yr old female, you fool !
and looking at his expression, seriously gets me off
i think i am gonna be sick…yep there it went…dammit. now i have to clean my laptop
You mean your computer, right?
Right?!
I’d tap pelosi. In a threesome with palin….mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…
Our country isn’t ready for that kind of bipartisanship. You’d all just end up masturbating in different corners of the room and hating yourselves afterwards.
LOL!!
We are already doing that but with China watching. God, typing that made me feel dirty.
O_O Whoa. I think we may have reached the Twilight Zone.
What he’ s really saying is “we are going to tax and spend like there’s no tomorrow now baby!”
Not all that much to stop them now.
not much at all, except maybe a little “change we can believe in”
I believe not only in change, but in large denomination bills!
And more discovered votes for me!!!!!
That’s ok, someday when you grow up you’ll understand reality.
I thought we had a rule to not respond to those using this type of username???
*beats CF with a big fish. Specifically a Hippoglossa hippoglossa. Not so much because he broke the rules, but moreso for the halibut*
oops. Didn’t we say something about people using political name? I think that I remeber sombody saying something… Hey, are you gonna eat that?
*calls PeTA, to report fish abuse and bad pun*
To be fair, Charlie may have been busy working on Mrs. Foxtrot’s shed when we decided this. I don’t think he knows. Even if he does know, his memory is sometimes unreliable. Unless, of course, it involves the answer to an obscure trivia pursuit question that the opposing team thinks he has NO WAY of knowing and he pull it out his ass (jerk). Then his memory’s just fine.
I can’t get anyone to play trivial pursuit with me for this reason.
You should play trivial pursuit with our family. We’ve taken to keeping a laptop close by so we can go to wikipedia to settle the flame wars that inevitably start. It’s never even about the question (although Charlie is famous for getting all angry and being all like, “I want the number of that card, that’s not right!”) but usually some offshoot discussion that only dimly relates to the question. No wonder games take hours to finish.
That’s an unreliable distortion…I want the number of that post!
Why would Norm not want to make sure that the votes were counted properly?
Why indeed!
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think Al is going to pull off an upset now. But how much does Norm suck to be in such a tight race against some SNL comedian? LULZ.
Truly! In his defense, he’s been much more strictly into satire the last few years with his books etc. Researching them is what got him into politics etc. in the first place! LOL
Not much of an upset when the gap was only 226 votes or so. I think Coleman’s going down on this one!
Also, many of the remaining precincts trend Democrat.
Hmm, “we’ll simply have to live with an increasing deficit for the next couple of years” seems vastly different from “deficit doesn’t matter”, which is the attitude of the Republicans. (Google “deficits don’t matter Cheney” if you don’t believe me.) I’m sure we’ll be paying the deficit down by the end of the Obama administration.
Typical Democrat tactic. Challenge and recount all the votes again and again until I win. SOunds like Sore-Loserman all over again. ALso sounds like the Ohio fiasco with Kerry and Jesse Jackson. Recounts only apply when it means a democrat could get into office.
The only change i see is back to a Clinton-esque cabinet.
The cabinet has not all been selected yet, let alone confirmed. I also heard a rumor that Obama will keep the current secretary of defense, but of course you ignore that one. Also, don’t forget that if a business, such as a restaurant, changes management, they may keep the existing employees, but your dining experience may be completely different. They might serve different dishes anfd have different policies for customer service. SO even though you still have the same people you’re in contact with, it IS different.
-
In other words, We can’t see what changes will be made yet as the man hasn’t even taken office yet!! Lets reserve judgment til we get some tenure in the white house, shall we?
Talking points propaganda is for those who can’t think for themselves.
You have a good point. I just want to see the ‘change’ that Obama was talking about for the last two years. If keeping the same employees or (God forbid) hiring old ones from the Clinton years is change, then that’s change we don’t need : )
I’m only saying it’s a bit soon to jump on that wagon. The Obama campaign was as successful as it was because he hired great people to run it with him. He’s (hopefully) still picking people who he thinks are goo at their jobs, but he’ll be the one giving them their directions now, not the Clintons. I say wait and see til he’s been in office for a while before making this determination.
*good, not goo. W left enough of that behind in the white house.
no, lol, that was bill …
Soooooo, it’s change yer wantin’? NOW you tell us!
I’ve got the whole article linked, but here’s a preview:
New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner is expected to be President-elect Barack Obama’s choice to head the Treasury Department. Reports of his selection sent stocks soaring at the close of trading Friday.
I replied you, but PK nommed it. Anyway, Wall Street reacted very favorably yesterday to Obama’s probable choice for Treasury. I’m not aware of any Clinton ties, but I’ve already covered that topic in another post. (link)
.
We need to develop a clever acronym for: “I’ve already replied, but PK ate it. Sorry if this appears as a duplicate post at some point.” Any ideas?
We could steal Rush’s shorthand and just say “Dittoes”?
No offense, but NO.
AMEN to that FrouFrou! We don’t need the “wonder years” of the Clintons all over again. But it looks like that what we’re going to get with Obama, which means everyone who voted for him got duped. Or maybe it means they just didn’t listen close enough to what he was saying.
Which part didn’t you like, the peace or the prosperity?
Oh wait, Republican. Must have been the peace.
You total robber baron! I was sooo waiting for a place to make that comment, and ya scooped meh! *shakes fist* I’ll get you yet, you rascal!
There was peace and prosperity during the Clinton years? Gee, I vaguley remember a useless war in Bosnia, and thats right didn’t Clinton get mad at his Chinese backers and bomb one of their embassies also? As for prosperity, yeah it was real prosperous, he moved affirmative action to the housing market and look at the mess we are in now. Thanks President Clinton, because of you there are so many home-foreclosures. And to top all that off we got a psychotic ex-vice-president running around telling everyone they are killing the earth and to buy carbon-offsets from his company to save the world from global warming….
Eww! What’s that smell?
I heard they were talking about Hillary for Sec. of Defense.
I heard Sec. of State?
Ah damn, that’s what I meant, I fail.
I responded to this. It was eaten. It’ll show up eventually, but to clarify, I read defense, it turned into state in my mind, I typed out my comment and it turned back to defense when I was typing. I really DID know this, promise!
It’s State, and it looks highly likely now. The announcement is expected after Thanksgiving.
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. What Obama’s trying to prevent, will just happen from the inside. He’s trying to apease Satan, and offering Satan a piece of fruit when he (she) wants your soul isn’t going to work. She’ll take the job, and then somehow manage to undermine him from the inside.
Cabinet members serve at the pleasure of the President. If she tries to undermine him or initiate her own policies from within, we will hear an announcement that she’s leaving her office to “spend more time with her family.”
That said, Hillary is not stupid. She knows what restrictions she will face if she takes this post. Still, sometimes I wish one of those imaginary bullets in Bosnia had come from an expert marksman…
I think Hillary is a great idea. Here’s what I’m confused about. We heard all election about how inexperienced Obama is and how he wasn’t ready to be president. Now when he is nominating experienced advisors he’s being criticized for it? He’s damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t. If he’d brought in new people he would be criticized for having an inexperienced cabinet. Listen, we need to have a little bit of commen sense here. Politics as usual may frustrate the commen man, but the fact of the matter is Obama has a whole mess of problems waiting for him and if he wants to get anything done in a timely fashion he needs to have people who know how the game is played. That being said, they are ADVISORS. He doesn’t have to listen to him, and it’s his agenda being carried out, not the other way around.
Them, not him. That may have been a fruedian slip on Hil’s sexuality?
Oh no no no, I’m not criticizing his choices based on his own experience, I’m criticizing them because he’s getting people who have been part of the problem for the last (up to) 30 years. If he really wants change, let’s go for it! I’m all for shaking up Washington, but bringing in the same old tired people is not the way to do it. It’s almost as though he said something (“I will change Washington!”), and didn’t commit.
-
I promise I’m still giving him a chance to screw up before I condemn him, though. He’s still president, and I respect the office if not the man. I want him to do well, I really do!
Well, where exactly is he going to get new people who have experience and know how to get things done in Washington. Sadly, the way it’s set up you get either one or the other, experience but “part of the problem” (although that’s a matter for another debate) or not “part of the problem” and no experience. Bill Clinton was criticized for bringing in all new people and then not getting anything done because no one knew how the system worked and how to do anything. The change, as I see it, is the ideas and the way we look at things, bringing in experienced people will mean they can give (hopefully) realisitic advice on the best way to enact these new ideas.
*crossing fingers* I really honestly hope he does a good job. We need a good president.
That’s what I like about you and ema. You may not have chosen him, but you want him to succeed because it’s good for all of us, whereas some people are so party blinded they would rather he fail (and the rest of us get screwed even worse than we are) so they can have a win next time around.
Our mommas raised us to be good losers ; )
*gives a virtual shout out to froo and ema’s awesome mom’s*
Why thank ya! I agree, I hope he does well too.
*a-hem*
-
what am I, chopped liver?
*hugs* Not as icky as chopped liver, no.
Aww, thanks!
At least I get one vote..
If you think about it, Dems experienced on the national stage would *have* to be associated with the Clinton administration, or one degree of separation. Otherwise, Obama’s transition team would be vetting Carter’s people…by seance???
Except all of those Blue Dog Democrats that just got elected…
I wonder how many people caught on to what you’re saying. I’m not sure everybody understands the difference between Yellow Dog Democrats and Blue Dog Democrats. As a Blue Dog, I *woof* approvingly!
I know yellow dog, but what’s blue dog?
Boiled down, a Blue Dog Democrat is fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
So does that make me a blue dog Repub? Maybe a purple cat repub. I like that ; )
How about “Cheshire Cat Conservative?”
My teeth aren’t that big. What about ‘Horse Of A Different Color Conservative’ so that I don’t fit into any easily defined category and get along with everyone?
Horse is too close to donkey, and I know you would hate that. Hmm. How about Purple Lizard Conservative? Everybody likes lizards, amirite?
…and BONUS: You can change colors any time you want!
And eat flies! ; )
-
I hereby align myself with the Purple Lizard Conservatives of the world! I have no idea what we stand for, but I’m sure it will be fun!
And eat flies! ; )
-
I hereby align myself with the Purple Lizard Conservatives of the world! I have no idea what we stand for, but I’m sure it will be fun!
*puts Froo on plaid cloth to see if it’s true that she will asplode*
*asplodes*
Careful, it might make you a….
*whispers*
…Libertarian…
LOLZ!! Please let’s not go there! Besides, Libertarians don’t have any cool animal mascots…
I’m thinking it’s going to be hard to top Junior’s spending. Anyone wanna talk me down on that point?
*crickets chirping, with faint sound of vacuum cleaner, down the hall*
Junior can’t spend a dime without Congress. There! How do you like them apples!! ; )
Thank you for throwing me a bone, but I’m thinking Obama will throw less money to the winds. Despite your efforts, I’m still not talked down.
Oh, believe it or not, I agree with you. I think ema said it best: “Bush spends money like a drunken sailor on shore leave.”
Yeah, if the drunken sailor had billions of dollars on loan from China, that would work! ; )
Please, the republicans are much better at spending than the democrats have ever been. They just put it on the old National Credit Card. I much prefer that we tax enough to pay that republican deficit down a bit. And who better to pay it than those who’ve been financial winners under the republican economy?!?
I thought Obama recently said the deficit doesn’t matter? Recent 60 minutes interview?
Correct. In the context of trying to prevent a massive meltdown, he said that we’ll simply have to live with an increasing deficit for the next couple of years.
Back-into-context WIN!!
Yes, and PortlandMark’s post above has a d@mning piece of Cheney 411 on the same topic, if you care to see it.
As opposed to not tax and spend, spend, spend? Why can’t a lol just be a lol any more?
You mean like the Santa one, just after this one? If not, IHAH and ICHC have lols that are just lols.
Wow not one comment on how unlikely it is that a pair of democrats would be turned on by the constitution. Unless some judge was thinking of “interpreting” it.
Actually, I was just thinking they look relieved the Constitution is finally safe from the reaming it’s been getting for the last 8 years.
Well, if you consider that any such putative Constitution in Rahm’s pocket would be crushed and disintegrated…
Er wait, isn’t that what the Patriot Act did?
No – you’re thinking the “Fairness Act”- just use a razor to cut out that darn old First Amendment!
Bush’s approach to the Constitution: tl;dr.
and dk;dc
Bush’s *actual* opinion of the Constitution: “It’s just a God d@amned piece of paper!” (link)
Nope, not one stupid comment like that Doubts. Except, of course, yours…Hmmm…
Oops–We hoped too soon. (next car down)
Oops–*different* stupid comment–fail.
certainly is NOT the Constitution… that would be the forbidden C word to those two.
Right, because a couple of legislators like those two would be all turned on by the anti-Constitutional unitary executive we’ve been subjects of for the past two terms.
GTFO, eejit.
Two words: Patriot Act
“Gee, your hair smells terrific!”
“… would you be offended if he was a midget?”
” Filibuster me all night long, Big Boy !”
Wrong house…Fail
Sexy sentiment WIN
Rahmification in …3 …2 …1
(not mine, but it was up for votes)
Oh the horrible…horrible images this has brought to my mind. The only thing that can wash that away is the ‘offended’ article on ED.
“President Pelosi ? Say it again !”
“it”
( facepalm)****
This is too F$%^#ed up for words! There is no excuse or pardon for that. I think the caption did the photo justice.
oddly reminiscent of the McCain and Palin pic. these people in Washington are Horndogs!!!
LOL there’s just no way I couldn’t send this to my favorite conservative Republican coworker! Awesome lolz atm.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwww……that’s icky on so many levels.
fap fap fap
what the…ewwwww..urghhh…my head hurt..
Hmmmmm, She does look like she has a vitamin ‘F’ deficicency… Doesn’t she?
If this is the way Israel’s enemies speak, I’ve just changed my mind about whether Israel bears any responsibility for their war with the Palestinians.