Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


The new Minister of Goofy Walks was sworn in today.


Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

The new Minister of Goofy Walks was sworn in today.

What is going on in the picture? Tell us in the Comments

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: amtronic

» Recaption This

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 243 comments

  1. Slashydutchie says:

    Is the Ministry of Goofy Walks the American version of the British Ministry of Silly Walks?

    Are they required to keep a straight face as well?

    • rhorho says:

      That “Separation of Church and State” prevents the U.S. from having anything called a “Ministry.” As an avid MPFC fan, I’m donning a black armband. This is a dark day, indeed.
      *covers Silly Walks Honorable Mention plaque with black cloth*

      • Danbala says:

        ‘That “Separation of Church and State” prevents the U.S. from having anything called a “Ministry.”’
        .
        Umm… What?

        • rhorho says:

          In the U.S., there is a doctrine that separates Church and State. For that reason, we don’t have government offices called “Ministries.”

          • Danbala says:

            Oh, btw, does this mean there are Americans who think that all the other ministries and ministers of this and that around the world are some sort of clergy?

            • rhorho says:

              Speaking for myself only, Royalty as Head of Church is a baffling notion.

            • rhorho says:

              To answer your question accurately: No, we know the “Minister of ___” is not some form of clergy. That said, I (personally) don’t understand the business about the Queen being the head of the Church of England.

              • Danbala says:

                Hear, hear. But dem Brits are crazy like dat. ;P

                • rhorho says:

                  That has GOT to be the best explanation, EVAR!!
                  .
                  By the way, how is it that you are entirely OUTSTANDING in the English language?

                  • Danbala says:

                    Thank you for the compliment! Many reasons, I think, but mostly it’s a birth defect – having a mother who teaches the Swedish language (and religion, but that’s another story ;P ) has given me an interest in grammar and spelling, and most of all a fascination with the powers that good usage of any language gives a person.

                    • rhorho says:

                      I think what’s fascinating about you is your use of idiom, truly the most difficult part of a living language. Do you speak/listen frequently to British, American, or others?

                      • Danbala says:

                        (New theory: it’s the smilies that make posts not post. I’ll try to repeat my response-attempt, without smilies, and see what happens!)
                        .
                        Well, yes, we do subtitling (hur, hur, I wrote “tit”) in Sweden, not dubbing/voice-over (except for in shows and movies for little kids). So basically everything I watch on TV has the dialogue in American or British English, and I think that helps a lot. Then, of course, I’ve been an Internet-creature for well over ten years now, and that might be as important a source, especially when it comes to more colloquial expressions.
                        .
                        One fun thing about Swedes speaking English is that we tend to mix American and British words (and pronounciation, for that matter) rather wildly, since there has been a tendency to teach British English in our schools, while most of the popular culture has been dominated by American TV and music. I often mess up in the usage of lift/elevator, flat/apartment, subway/underground and such.

                        • slanagat says:

                          That’s all right, I often mix up BrE and AmE usage in my everyday speech and I’ve lived in the US all my life. In writing I’m usually consistent one way or the other; many of my side jobs editing translations are texts for publication in Europe where BrE is the norm so I’ve learned to write in “pure” BrE as well as AmE.

                        • Danbala says:

                          I’m glad there’s only one Swedish. ;oP

                        • rhorho says:

                          Your usage is stellar. Who said TV wasn’t edjakashunal? As for mixing English and American, you are likely in safe company here. Many of us have been exposed to “the other English” at some point, and can usually decipher the common usage glitches between us. Slan is a great example! : D

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          @slanagat: Having moved to Australia four years ago, I’ve had to change a lot about my writing/speaking style. I’ve learned the use of the letter ‘U’ in words like coloUr, favoUrite, etc. plus learning to drop ‘the’ in sentences. For example, here you don’t go to THE hospital, you just go to hospital. There’s a whole host of other words I’ve had to relearn and sometimes it just does my head in. The only reason I’ve adopted the style here is I was getting tired of people looking at me like I was ignorant!

                        • froofrou says:

                          My parents lived in England for about 3 years while my dad was preaching. My mother said that it was so hard to learn to drive on the ‘wrong’ side of the road that she catches herself wanting to do it still, 30 years later. They also knew another American family living there who had two children who spoke British English at school (complete with accent) and American English at home. It was really rather confusing : )

                        • slanagat says:

                          Code switching like that is a surprisingly common phenomenon. You probably know several people who absorb accents like sponges, let them spend significant time away and they sound like they’ve lived there all their lives.

                          For added fun, I usually spend an hour or so a night on Skype with my sweetie in Northampton (UK). Not only do I absorb her accent when we’re talking, but it comes out when I’m tired in other contexts as well (we usually talk right before bed).

                        • froofrou says:

                          I have a bad habit of mimicing. (sp???). It drives my husband nuts! It used to be picking up slight accents everywhere I went, now it presents as picking up slang and ethnic-talk depending on who I’ve just spent 10 minutes around. I have to fight it. I was never as bad as actually using a completely different accent (it’s hard to do that when you have a country drawl, lol), but the staccato of my voice will change depending on who I’m listening to.

                        • rhorho says:

                          That reminds me of the Woody Allen movie, /Zelig./

                        • Danbala says:

                          Oops. My reply ended up being in the wrong spot. Alas, this time I can’t blame PK – I simply clicked the wrong “reply here”-link. :P

                        • AC says:

                          I spent about a week at camp with some folk from Glasgow. For ages afterwards the only adjective I used was “pure” and all my sentences had a Glaswegian “but” on the end. It was truly awful.
                          They all spoke like:
                          “Cannae be bothered but.”
                          and
                          “It’s pure minging but.”
                          Speaking like a wegie’s contagious.

                        • rhorho says:

                          @AC: The Glaswegians called. They want their buts back.

                        • slanagat says:

                          Have you been grabbing Glaswegian butts again? You’re liable to get yourself a Glasgow kiss that way.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Wow–I had to look that up. Thank you for the new fun term! One of my cats gives me a Glasgow kiss every morning and night, at least. Now we have a name for it! :o )

                      • Danbala says:

                        Well, it’s good to know that the AmE/BrE-switching isn’t too much of a bother. :o )
                        As for the pronounciation-switching I think I might be doing a bit of what froofrou describes and change it a bit according to how my discussion partner sounds. :o )
                        .
                        (I also do that in Swedish, though less now than when I was young. Er. I always worry that the person I talk to will take offense, thinking I am mocking their dialect or something. :o ( )

                        • martin says:

                          You wrote:
                          “I’m glad there’s only one Swedish”

                          You mean only one written Swedish. My guess is that you are from Svealand and don’t travel much outside your part of Sweden.

                          There are a lot of very different spoken Swedish dialects. Old English could easily pass as just another Swedish dialect.

                          As for myself, I think (and rarely speak) in a Swedish dialect that has kept most of the grammar from Old Norse and have not been as influenced by Low German as TV Swedish. Because of all inflections you can mix the order of words pretty much how you like and easily ignore saying half of them. Because I’m from a sea town where people have done a lot of trading with other parts of the world, since at least three thousand years, I have a very extended vocabulary compared to Sveamål. The most prominent influences being from Modern Norse, Scottish, English, High German, French, Italian, Spanish, Lingua Franca and Latin.

                          In my dialect the combination of consonants within a word change the pronunciation of vocals in it. As a side effect, people from some parts of my birth town don’t need to pronounce any consonants when they speak. I have yet to find any pronunciation of any vocal in any other language that don’t exist in my dialect.

                          Of course, my dialect (as many other Swedish dialects) is totally unwritable with Latin characters. I’m not even sure it is writable with any existing phonetic alphabet.

                        • Danbala says:

                          “My guess is that you are from Svealand and don’t travel much outside your part of Sweden.”
                          .
                          Oh, don’t make assumptions. ;oP My comment about only one Swedish was more light-hearted than serious.

                        • Kittymouth says:

                          I can only imagine the lulz you get from us Americans when and if
                          you use the British meaning of “Rubber” (An eraser) since our
                          usage of “a rubber” means a condom. :P

              • Tessie says:

                So, does that also mean that the Secretary of State doesn’t have to type and file?

              • eddiepscetti says:

                I believe it goes back to the days of Thomas Beckett. Henry VIII wanted a divorce, the RCC said no, and Henry directed Beckett to split from the RCC. Hence, the Church of England and the Monarch being the head of the church.
                -
                If my history is incorrect, please, someone correct me.

              • Yonkel says:

                The probable reason you (and a lot of other people) don’t understand about HRH Elizabeth being the head of the Church of England is because she is not! The monarch is “Defender of the Faith”, a whole different ballgame. Parliament has more to do with the running of the English state church than does the crown, a fine example of why we Yanks have a consitutional prohibition of an “established church”.

                As to “ministers”, the governmental definition is “One to whom the sovereign or executive head of a government intrusts the management of affairs of state, or some department of such affairs.” (MyDictionary.net)

                • rhorho says:

                  Thank you, Yonkel! :o )
                  .
                  I’m impressed that you were able to pick my sincere question out of the confusing word choices. Do you work with the insane as a living? ;o)
                  .
                  When Danbala and I were writing each other, our posts were popping up, seemingly randomly, all over the threads. The general atmosphere at that time was one of confusion. (Our conversation makes a lot more sense in one place, in chronological order, truly!)
                  .
                  Thank you for clearing up the confusion about the Queen’s role in the Church. It’s none of my business, but I’ve been baffled about my mistaken impression that the top Royal Family member would be automatically regarded as the head of the Church. “Defender” sounds like a much nicer job. ~_O

          • rhorho says:

            …but we have “Administrations,” which is weird.
            *Note to self: Ask doctor for better sleep medication.*

            • Danbala says:

              Why is that weird? (I just seem to be getting more confozzled.)

              • rhorho says:

                Sorry to drag you into my personal hell, Dear! ; )

                • Danbala says:

                  No worries, being dragged into various hells is a favourite pastime of mine.

                • Hell Hath No Fury says:

                  I’m not yours, and wait…there are satirical site commentators in me?!

                  • rhorho says:

                    LMAO!! *hugs*
                    Sorry for the copyright infringement. I’m sure we can settle out-of-court.
                    *Hands HHNF a box of bon-bons*

                    • Hell Hath No Fury says:

                      I demand a sacrifice! I will say ni again to you if you do not appease me! I want….a shrubbery!!!!

                      • rhorho says:

                        *Sets healthy 3-gallon containerized Viburnum dilatatum ‘Cardinal Candy’ at Hell’s feet. Considers getting the bon-bons back, but abandons the idea. Dashes off quickly across the street, scooting deftly between honking cars. Hides in Starbucks, behind a Republican-looking dude.*

                        • froofrou says:

                          Ok Miss Master G, what the crap is a Viburnum Dilatatum? Dont’ make me google it. You won’t like me when I google. : )

                        • rhorho says:

                          Ooohhh noooeeezzz! Don’t Google!
                          The V. dilatatum, cultivar ‘Cardinal Candy’ is a purty-purty shrubbery. (link)
                          I ran in here because I was afraid of HHNF, but the Republican-looking dude turns out to be really nice. He’s been buying me fancy coffee products all day. I’ve learned a lot today. You conservatives look better through caffeine goggles.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Oops–Hopefully this link will work.

                        • Hell Hath No Fury says:

                          It’s okay, I live in the home of all evil names for fancy coffee, Seattle. And it’s mostly Liberals here. I’m not THAT scary, save for at 5am when I look like a homeless drug-addicted hooker. “give me all your taxes in the form of welfare!!!!” lol

                        • rhorho says:

                          LOL–”Homeless drug-addicted hooker” is my signature style. It’s not just for breakfast, you know…
                          I’m incredibly skittish about evil coffee names, but it’s mainly because it’s against my religion to doctor up a perfect thing. That said, I love Cafe du Monde coffee with chicory, and have been known to eat chocolate covered coffee beans.

                        • froofrou says:

                          *goes into caffeine shock*
                          -
                          *lays twitching on the floor*

              • rhorho says:

                I need to hit the books, and decipher “ministry.” I’m sure “ministry” is related to “administration,” but I’ve never thought about why we use one word and not the other. Did we screw everything up? (Flamers beware: I’m mean!)

                • Danbala says:

                  Yes… As far as I can figure it out, both words stem from the latin word for servant. Apparently (in English) “minister” and “ministry” have been tainted with ambiguous religious usage (as in “servant of god” etc., I suppose). In Swedish we don’t have any religious versions of the minister-word, hence my initial confusion. “Administration” probably has had the good fortune to steer clear of religious connotations.

            • Danbala says:

              Just for explanation’s sake: I have posted about 7 or 8 posts responding to various posts of yours today. Most seem to get eaten by PK. I feel a bit consored. So, if things are not making sense, it might be that posts are just stuck in some Pundit Lardery somewhere.

              • rhorho says:

                PK is definitely acting up, but I think our posts are in one place. Anyway, as patchy as this conversation is, I started out thinking that we didn’t use the word “ministry” because we strictly adhere to separating church and state. That said, to me, it’s clear that the word “administration” comes from the same root as “ministry.” It’s kind of hard to follow our conversation, as some of it has appeared at the top, and some at the end of the posts.

                • slanagat says:

                  It all sorted eventually. Girl, this lack of a sleep pattern will be the end of you….

                  • rhorho says:

                    Tell me about it–Jeez! Lately, it seems that every 4-5 days I pull an all-nighter. I’m not much for medication, but this situation is making me crazy. Well, at least the upcoming holiday will sort out my schedule…
                    *headdesk*

          • Charlene says:

            That isn’t just wrong, it’s stupidly wrong.

            The use of “minister” to mean “clergyman” is about 100 years younger than the use of “minister” to mean “government officer”. American word usage has nothing to do with it.

            Daft.

            • rhorho says:

              I certainly didn’t indicate that American usage changed the meaning of the word, and I clearly stated that I didn’t know the usage history. (…and neither did you, before you Googled it.) Pull that stick out and don’t be so quick to judge: It’s not attractive.

        • Shiny says:

          Sarcasm.

          It cannot be explained, it must be experienced.

      • Sune says:

        There are no separation of church and state since the first Bush in the white house.
        lol rednecks in power!

  2. Brandon_ha says:

    amtronic you fail the internet. It’s silly walks.

  3. Sarah says:

    it’s SILLY walks people. SILLY walks.

  4. Cecona says:

    caption fail

  5. Megan says:

    *headdesk*….big time caption FAIL

  6. Pythoner says:

    Gah, yes you EE-DIOT, it’s SILLY WALKS, the bloody Ministry of SILLY WALKS…. sheesh!

  7. may300m says:

    Would be a lot better if this person knew their Monty Python well enough to put SILLY walks…

  8. desikitteh says:

    … i want to cry.

  9. faetal says:

    Gold Star for effort —-> *

  10. Paul says:

    Gawd… I really don’t know what to say about this… It’s just a complete travesty to all that is Monty Python. Way to go, dipshit.

  11. Adam says:

    lol @ all the angry poms

  12. Cardinal Ximinez says:

    What will be next?

    Nobody expects the Portuguese Inquistion!

  13. Tessie says:

    Honestly? I never wanted *that* good a look at John Cleese’s ass.

  14. padawan says:

    The second, beggining from the left, is the (kind of) governor of Euskadi, a part of Spain, and the man in his right is the king of Spain

  15. Kent Wayne Logan says:

    Wow. People get crazy about accurate quotation.

    Seriously people, Monty Python probably misquoted himself a few times. The idea was just to crazy go nuts and have a good time. Not tear people down on ‘quotation fail’ after they put together a good piece.

    That said, the correct line is ‘ministry of silly walks’, bro, just so’s you get it right next time. But this was awesome.

  16. Chris says:

    its SILLY walks. i can tell tht uve never actually seen Monty Python’s Flying Circus….No Sir, I dont approve!!

    • Hell Hath No Fury says:

      Disapproving Rabbit? Is that you, the cousin of killer bunny? The most foul, cruel, bad-tempered rabbit you’ve ever set eyes on?

  17. Roflmao says:

    Ministry of the silly Basques

  18. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA says:

    I’m sorry I’m late, my walk has gotten SILLIER lately.

  19. Selkhit2 says:

    One does not silly walk into Mordor.

  20. Skip says:

    It’s SILLY walks. Not GOOFY walks.

    But aside from the error, that’s pretty funny. :D

  21. Wholesome says:

    DAMN IT! I WANTED THAT JOB!!!

  22. Ma.Belle.Fleur says:

    Monty Python reference-FAIL

  23. Nich says:

    That’s Silly, SILLY!

  24. Jon Y. says:

    ITS SILLY Walks. lol Can someone please put this as a FAIL picture? lol

  25. Guess Again says:

    You know…this is one of those times that the comments made me rofl waaaaaayyyyy more than the pic+caption…and not by just a little, A LOT!

  26. Bossy says:

    OP = knob jockey. Talk about cringe-inducing.

  27. Dr_M says:

    PYTHON FAIL “Silly walks” YOU LOSE!!!11!!!!!1111EXCLAMATIONPOINT!!!

  28. Etxebarriak says:

    The guy in the middle of the five guys in suits in the back is Rey Juan Carlos, the king of Spain; the guy doing the weird walk/dance (called a dantza) is Basque. The king came to Bilbao a few days ago to talk about ETA, and the dantza is an honorary dance for him.

  29. Joel says:

    Americans shouldn’t make monty python references.
    they FAIL

  30. Jack says:

    All right. It was supposed to be the Ministry of Silly Walks. But it was one skit, and this is one user who watched it and forgot the name. This is not evidence that “America shouldn’t make monty python references.” Gaff. Deal with it.

  31. Bcd says:

    Anyone knows that the man dressed in white was dancing?

    It’s a Basque Country [Spain] traditional dance. It’s called “Aurresku”, and it’s quite difficult to do, but pretty beautyfull to see.

  32. Wendy says:

    That should be “The Minister of SILLY Walks.” Someone doesn’t know their Monty Python.

  33. M. says:

    Everyone knows Monty Python’s “Ministry for Silly Walks”. Everyone knows the “Parrot Sketch” as well. Americanizing the caption takes the humour out of it- who cares if you don’t have Ministries…
    You never hear anyone talk about “Cat Sketch Not Included”, do you? I’m from Canada, so yes, that IS how humour is supposed to be spelled.

    • rhorho says:

      If you had reading comprehension, you would probably know the difference between the main point and an aside. I brought up the word “ministry” as a trivial point, and everyone else but you and a sad troll had no trouble comprehending.
      Oh, yes, and it’s likely that the captioner simply didn’t remember the word “Silly,” and substituted the word “Goofy” by mistake. The mistake drew disgust from all.
      You know, it’s not all about Americans trying to Americanize everything. It sounds like you have a huge chip on your shoulder. Getting your back bowed up about the spelling of “humo(u)r?” Seriously?? Now you’ve just downgraded yourself to pathetic.

  34. Floraatje says:

    It’s SILLY walks, ignorants… but nice pic anyhow ^^

  35. Josh says:

    ITS SILLY WALKS YOU NOOB

  36. PHB says:

    Silly walks, noob!

  37. poultryshake says:

    Why don’t you people ever get it right?! It’s Ministry of SILLY Walks! Not crazy, funny, or goofy! Silly!

  38. perromacho says:

    US Education suxs: learn some Latin (Now someone will say “is the language of the latin people” so i will LOL)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up