Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


SENATOR FRANKEN



Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

SENATOR FRANKEN: Because he’s good enough, he’s smart enough, and just enough people like him.

(Al Franken)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 657 comments

  1. Jocasta says:

    Something about his expression creeps me out.

    • froofrou says:

      It’s the stomping his feet and suing like a little girl.

      • Nah, little girls would just make up rumors. He sued like a properly full grown brat.

      • John says:

        Kind of like how Coleman is bringing up a lawsuit, too?

      • Motas says:

        Wasn’t the recount automatic due to the small margin? And now his opponent is the one suing. At least Franken was actually on the ballot.

        • froofrou says:

          The recount was supposed to be automatic due to the margin, but Franken sued anyway. Hence the foot-stomping-like-a-little-girl image.

          • rhorho says:

            Whatever gets you through the night, Dear.

            • AtlasShrugged says:

              Sounds like the title of a musical ” Suing your way to the Senate”!

              • Seth says:

                Well, it’s catchier than ‘being elected to the Senate by a majority of
                your constituents,’ although less accurate. Lawsuits without the votes only gets you into office if your name is Bush.

                • Boris says:

                  If I remember correctly, it was Gore that started those lawsuits…

                  • rhorho says:

                    This thread is about Al Franken and Norm Coleman’s
                    2008 House race, not the 2000 Presidential race.

                  • Tessie says:

                    You remember incorrectly. The lawsuit was Bush vs. Gore.

                    • froofrou says:

                      What reason would Bush have to sue? He was winning.

                      • rhorho says:

                        Bush sued to halt the Florida recount, per the
                        Florida Supreme Court. In its finding, the U.S.
                        Supreme Court overruled the FSC, effectively
                        halting the recount, and reinstated Republican
                        Katherine Harris’s declaration of Bush’s victory
                        over Gore.

                        • forge says:

                          And if anyone doubts Katherine Harris was totally in the bag for the Republicans, well… you’ve got major reality issues, is what.

                      • Tessie says:

                        I can’t speak for anyone’s motives but my own, but the lawsuit was indeed Bush vs. Gore (linked).

                        • Bookman says:

                          Yeah, that nayghty, naughty Bush – he should have done the right thing, and allowed Gore to re-count in just his 4 best counties alone, and stood aside on Gore’s roadway to victolly!

                          That was the only ethical thing to do, after the Democrats botched those ballot designs in the first place.

                          Ah, well. Gore can keep trying to shill his carbon credits scam, even though the Global Warming curve got broked.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          even though the Global Warming curve got broked.

                          That depends on which piece of politicised junk science you want to embrace…

                          And I notice the even your beloved Republicans have embraced the fact they can turn a dollar on wrapping themselves in the cloths of the Green…

                        • rhorho says:

                          the Democrats botched those ballot designs

                          Fact fail: Republican governor of Florida at
                          the time was named…Bush, I think it was…

                          Oh, yes, that’s it. What a coincidence! That
                          was the same name as one of the candidates,
                          wasn’t it?

                          Botched ballot design is a great reason for
                          a closer inspection, to determine actual
                          voter intent. The Republicans cried foul, and
                          ran to the USSC, didn’t they? Want to know
                          why? They didn’t want voter intent to stand
                          in the way of their victory.

                          Dolt.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Above was @Bookman, of course.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Really? I wasn’t sure ;)

                  • Elliott says:

                    Yeah, but they resulted in Bush being declared the winner, so Seth’s comment is accurate

              • Tessie says:

                “a musical ” Suing your way to the Senate”!”
                `
                I’ll SING my way to the Senate!
                [cues background music]
                OK, no I won’t. You’re welcome.

          • PortlandMark says:

            Coleman sued as much as Franken did, so please to apply the tar and feathers equally, okay?

            • AtlasShrugged says:

              Coleman sued only after Franken and his 600 lawyers stole the election. Why doesn’t Minnesota just redo the election?

              • PortlandMark says:

                Are you insane, dense, or willfully ignorant? Coleman has spent at least as much money and hired at least as many lawyers as Franken, how do you figure the election was stolen? Are you completely unaware of how our election and judicial processes work, or do you just have no respect for either one?

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  Are you insane, dense, or willfully ignorant?

                  Actually just a whiney republican who was doubtless up in arms that there were whiny democrats…

                  Basically, there are arseholes on all sides… at the moment it’s just Atlas and Frou throwing Urine and Vinegar about it… rather like spoiled children in fact…

                • Susanq says:

                  You don’t find it in the least big questionable that he now beats Coleman by about the same number of votes that Coleman beat him? And that the ‘missing’ votges were all in Franken’s favor? A statistical impossibility. And that there were just certain counties where the votes were recounted. In counties were Franken won on election night, the votes were certified. In counties where he lost, there had to be recounted. That doesn’t strike you as strange? If you don’t, I’m guessing you deserve Franken.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Cites, dear one, CITES!!!

                    PKers are largely news junkies, so if you have a source
                    for your claims that are not commonly known, you need
                    to provide sources. Otherwise, you’re just pulling from
                    your memory/impression of what you may or may not
                    have understood clearly from a source that may or may
                    not be correct.

                    For example:

                    And that the ‘missing’ votges were all in Franken’s favor?

                    You’re going to have a hell of a time pinning that bug
                    to the styrofoam, let me assure you!

                    To answer what is answerable:

                    There is nothing scary or spooky about recounted
                    votes going the other way, even to a similar degree.
                    Considering the tight race, it’s predictable, even.

                    Votes were recounted by mandate in *all* affected
                    counties due to the rules in place, so your statement
                    is wrong.

                    Thank you. Franken has the makings of a great
                    Senator.

                    • PortlandMark says:

                      [LINK]

                      Nice article at Salon that says what I believe better than I can. Title: Al Franken Stole the Election? Prove it or Shut Up.

                      • PortlandMark says:

                        Yeah, I should really include the link when I say I’m going to…

                      • rhorho says:

                        PM, I hope you don’t mind, but I took this from
                        your source:

                        “…the Minnesota Canvassing Board, whose decisions have so displeased the Republican right, was impeccably nonpartisan. Nobody in their right mind in Minnesota believes that the board was biased — and, in fact, Powerline blogger Scott Johnson, no friend of Democrats or Franken, has specifically spoken up to defend it. “There was no noticeable partisan division among the board,” he wrote. “Minnesotans are justifiably proud of the transparency and fairness of their work.”

                        Two of its five members are Supreme Court judges appointed by Tim Pawlenty, the state’s conservative Republican governor, each with a long record of loyal service to the GOP; a third is a nonpartisan elected judge; a fourth was appointed by former independent Gov. Jesse Ventura; and only one, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, is a Democrat. At the outset, Coleman’s own lawyers accepted the panel’s membership, as did everyone else, including Franken, who might have protested that his own party had only one member.

                        Their decisions against Coleman, which led to Franken’s provisional victory by 225 votes, were unanimous.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Damn you Rho, and your facts! I notice Atlas took a huge steaming cup of STFU over that one…

                        • rhorho says:

                          Atlas lives closer to me than froo does. Perhaps you see why I hang out on PK…

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          I sort of envisioned Atlas living out of a supermarket trolley and periodically stinking up a library somewhere to went his spleen…

                          but now, I find he lives in TX, which is almost the same…

                        • AtlasShrugged says:

                          Does your mother ever let you out of the basement much ?

                        • rhorho says:

                          @Unc: Told you so!!

                          Now give Atlas his blanket back so he will
                          quit post-stalking you…

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                          @Atlas: In Unc’s defense, at least his mother gives him clever,
                          RELEVANT things to say… instead of insults.

                  • PortlandMark says:

                    I’d laugh, but it hurts too much. Do you realize you now sound exactly like a liberal democrat on November 5th, 2000, and again on November 5th, 2004?

        • rhorho says:

          Yes, the margin forced the recount, then the suing–from both sides–
          commenced.

          • rhorho says:

            Check that: Coleman’s first suit (his fourth suit attached to a political race) was filed 30 October, six days before Election Day.

      • PortlandMark says:

        Yeah, I hate that too… oh, wait you weren’t talking about Coleman?

      • actorsandcrew68 says:

        Oh, you’re referring to that loser Coleman, who did a bunch of suing in this matter, right? You know, the FRIVILOUS, sore-loser kind?

      • Ceefax says:

        Who’s the guy currently taking legal action because he doesn’t like the result of the election again?

    • Uncle Fester says:

      TBH, his ‘I’m an “Eraserhead” fan boy hair cut” doesn’t inspire me…

  2. MLD says:

    Oh did he finally win, then?

  3. PKLurker says:

    He thinks that’s confetti, but it’s actually just every Minnesotan, conservative shredder taking a collective dump on him.

  4. Mark says:

    I saw him at the gym the other day.

  5. AC says:

    …And this is funny, how?

    • Jane St.Clair says:

      It references Al Franken’s SNL routine. Unless you already knew that and still didn’t think it was funny.

    • It requires knowledge of events here in the states that even I haven’t been following that much. He and another were sissy fighting over a position and apparently he won the sissy fight is what I am gathering. The just enough people like him bit did get a chuckle from me.

      • Or it could be a SNL skit that proves I haven’t watched television in eons…

        • rhorho says:

          The movie, based on the SNL character, was released in 1995. I guess
          it depends on your definition of “eons.”

          • 95 I was would been leaving 8th grade and heading into 9th in MS. I haven’t watched television since late 2000.

            Eons enough for me.

          • dissimilitude says:

            I was never a huge Franken fan (when he actually did comedy) but his Stuart Smalley character always cracked me up completely. I was even one of the approximately 12 people who liked the movie. Especially the intervention with his dad.

            For explanation, the character was this kinda wimpy guy from a dysfunctional family who had a tv show (public access, maybe?) called Daily Affirmation. He would always end it by looking at himself in the mirror and saying “…because I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!” I think the “just enough people”in the caption refers to the teeny tiny margin by which he won the recount.

            • rhorho says:

              Remember when the star basketball player did his affirmations
              with him? I forgot which player, but that was waaaay funny!

              • pittypat says:

                Funniest thing is, the Louise Hay affirmations worked for a
                time, then the poor shmucks fell into deep despair …

                • Seth says:

                  That’s how the ‘self help’ industry works. It’s like a drug, it makes you feel better about yourself for a short while, then comes the crash and you need to rush out and buy more. Think about it. If even a single self help book actually worked, then no more would need to be published.

                  • rhorho says:

                    I agree in part. Sometimes people need help, and self-
                    help books can offer advice, provide systems for
                    organizing thoughts, and/or the assurance that the
                    problems are not unique to them. Some people lack the
                    funds or are embarrassed to seek professional help.
                    Someone going through a divorce may not want to
                    share with a close friend, for fear of being avoided,
                    dragging the friend down, or, in a case where the friend
                    is close with the former spouse, repeated, rejected, etc.

                    Here’s the part where I agree: Like anything, self-help
                    books can be abused or given too much merit. My
                    psychologist neighbor actively reads self-help books.
                    I had assumed she read them for professional reasons,
                    but she told me that she reads them more for
                    personal insight than for use with clients. Now it seems
                    as though she’s “addicted to help.” Her library rivals
                    the self-help section at our local Barnes & Noble.

                  • pdq says:

                    Bill Waterston did a great riff on self-help in Calvin & Hobbes. Calvin wrote a self-helper titled Shut Up & Stop Whining, then worried that if it actually sold, there’d be no way to publish a sequel to make more money.

              • froofrou says:

                Michael Jordan. It was all Jordan could do not to crack up while he was speaking to the mirror.

                • Mike says:

                  Actually, it was Charles Barkley (or maybe both). Barkley was on for his “anger issues”, and also had on his teammate Mugsy Bouges.

                  • froofrou says:

                    Michael Jordan was my favorite. Mostly because he couldn’t keep a straight face.

                    • rhorho says:

                      I saw both, but was remembering the Michael Jordan
                      episode. Both were good, but Michael Jordan’s turn
                      at the mirror was classic!

                      I have hunted, but can only find the movie trailer
                      for Stuart Saves his Family, which is okay,
                      but doesn’t show the “Daily Affirmation.”

                  • Motas says:

                    Charles Barkley also went one-on-one with “Barney”-as-Godzilla in that episode. Hysterical!

  6. Whiney Republican says:

    WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

  7. Alden Bugly says:

    Franken is a douche bag who is not funny any longer and will be an embarassment to the Senate in the long run. Two bozso’s running for the same seat, neither worth a vote. Blech

    • Blinky says:

      Franken, wow, he’d be a great sidekick for Obama since they’re both asshats. The fine people of Minn. deserve the crap they voted into office.

      • PortlandMark says:

        I think we can all agree, these two demonstrate the difference between liberal and conservative people: the conservatives are just profane.

        • rhorho says:

          *observes trolls*

          Look, Mark… *points*

          Bugly and Blinky are married…

        • Steve says:

          I’m not sure how you can trivialize their comments when they use such intelligent and descriptive vocubulary such as “douche bag” and “asshats”. How can you dispute such factual statements?

      • AtlasShrugged says:

        But they didn’t vote him into office- he’s trying to sue his way in.

        • Seth says:

          Wrong. He won. That’s what happens when a majority, even a tiny majority, of people vote for you. He is now a Senator. He might not be seated yet, but he is a Senator. Sorry, but nowadays even an out of work comedian can beat an incumbent Republican. Now that’s funny!

          • Hana says:

            Actually, no, he didn’t. They were covering part of the recount on the news. They recounters were giving him votes that were OBVIOUSLY not for him. If a person marked the empty circle between Coleman and Franken, they give it to Franken. If there was a stray mark ANYWHERE near his name, they gave it to him.

            And my favorite…after he stomped his foot and demaned they recount because EVERY VOTE HAS TO COUNT!, (which is good. They should all count!) he came out 202 ahead. And yet, when Coleman’s team pointed out there were almost 2000 absentee ballots that were never opened and counted, Franken refused to let them be included. That’s why Coleman is now suing.

            Honestly…since we didn’t seem to learn our lesson after Ventura, I’d say we in MN deserve whatever we get. Bah. Franken wasn’t funny when he was a comedian. Maybe he’ll be funnier as a Senator. At least he can’t whine when no one takes him seriously!

            • rhorho says:

              Fact Fail.

              Please post after you have re-read about the topic from a reliable
              news source, or post on a topic in which you are better versed.
              Most people on PK are avid news readers, so please don’t
              substitute fantasy for fact. It’s too easy to check your false claims.

              I don’t want to speak for the GOPers, but believe the responsible
              ones here will cringe at your post, wishing you didn’t make their
              side look bad.

              • Hana says:

                Oh…so the news show that was showing the ballots they were recounting was totally faked??? WTH? I may not be totally versed in all your bs, but my eyes work pretty good.

                • froofrou says:

                  Take it easy, and show your work. If you bring a cite here to prove what you saw that isn’t a blog, then it will be easier to back up your point. Go get an address of a website that shows what you’re saying and come back. Otherwise, please stop making my side look bad.

                • rhorho says:

                  I am aware of your source. The claims as to the status
                  of the ballots you saw on TV were *implied,* not factual,
                  and you willingly fell for it. Didn’t you find it peculiar at the
                  time that no opposite examples were given? Of course not!
                  That would have gone against the conclusion you wanted.

                  Get the hook out of your mouth:
                  You’ve been Rickrolled by your own infotainment.

                • AtlasShrugged says:

                  Don’t worry- when you prove the left wrong here, their only defense is to claim your facts are wrong and demand you cite endless sources- then claim your sources are biased. You’ll see it frequently here.

            • PortlandMark says:

              Please to document your assertions, thanks.

          • rhorho says:

            It amazes me how Atlas and others can argue without benefit of
            insight.

            Seth, before these people attack again, this seems like a nice time to
            interject the light of day on these proceedings.

            Norm Coleman knows all about lawsuits: Don’t be fooled.

            FACT: Prior to this race against Fanken, Norm Coleman initiated
            three lawsuits late in the course of previous races.

            Lawsuits are Norm Coleman’s political modus vivendi.

            FACT: Prior to the end of this race, Coleman sued Al Franken for
            defamation of character. Really? Yes, really! October 30, 2008,
            in fact.

            Who started the lawsuit slinging? Norm Coleman did, that’s who!

            [LINK] under my name to Crew’s Most Corrupt Members of Congress.

            • froofrou says:

              I give it a year before there’s at least one more name added to that list.

            • froofrou says:

              What are they basing their label of ‘most corrupt’ on? Because i can think of a few off the top of my head that should be on that list, and aren’t.

              • Ev says:

                Hey, it’s a stiff competition. Your guys are just going to have to try harder.

              • rhorho says:

                That list only covers Senators and Representatives.

                • froofrou says:

                  I know that, I’m asking what gets them that label? Actual police records? Or smarmy tactics? What are the standards?

                  • rhorho says:

                    I could go to a lot of trouble finding out, but you would
                    conclude “smarmy tactics,” so let’s save me some
                    trouble, ignore the facts listed, and go with “vile,
                    corrosive, underhanded, diabolical smarmy tactics.”
                    There. Done.

                    • rhorho says:

                      Okay, that was harsh. It was frustrating to be
                      questioned about a website’s protocol, when my
                      purpose in providing the link was to show the
                      information.

                      Imagine if I were to ask you how CNN decided
                      which stories to air on a particular day, when you
                      were trying to show me a clip from one show.

                  • PortlandMark says:

                    From the CREW website:

                    Since 2003, CREW has closely monitored government ethics, bringing egregious conduct to light and holding public officials accountable for their misconduct. On our website you’ll find exhaustively investigated reports on corruption prepared by our research staff, high-impact lawsuits filed by our legal team, as well as the latest national ethics news. Thank you for your support.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                What are they basing their label of ‘most corrupt’ on? Because i can think of a few off the top of my head that should be on that list, and aren’t.

                List:

                The Executive Branch
                The Senate
                The House of Representative
                State Governance
                Judges
                State Legislature

                Did I miss anyone? It was just off the top of my head…

            • Beth says:

              It amazes me how people like you will state bald lies against people who do not blindly follow the liberal ideology.

              • froofrou says:

                Now hang on a minute, what lies has she stated? She’s got sources backing her up. I don’t like Huffington, but that particular article seems to be based solely on police records.

              • rhorho says:

                I didn’t lie. You have, and you are a troll. You’re not a very
                *bright* troll, but maybe you can work your way up in the
                ranks. Best wishes.

              • Eric-in-STL says:

                Hey, hey, those aren’t bald lies! Those are facts wearing a toupee! Watch it!

              • Uncle Fester says:

                @Beth

                No that should read

                It amazes me how people will state bald lies against people who do not blindly follow the same ideology.

                There… that’s now sane… what you’d written was just male bovine droppings and made you seem terribly, terribly stupid.

                • rhorho says:

                  If you boil tea made from the mushrooms growing from
                  those bovine droppings, you may see things her way…

                  *watches walls breathe*

            • BattleCry says:

              Just because Norm Coleman is a complete douche doesn’t mean that Al Franken isn’t a total chode.

              • rhorho says:

                It doesn’t mean anything at all about Al Franken, in fact.

                That said, it would be funny if Coleman’s *next* lawsuit were
                styled “Complete Douche vs. Total Chode.”

            • ubr says:

              @rhorho… i commend your correct use of the latin language… i’m glad that the 4yrs of high school latin did not go to waste…

  8. ubr says:

    just barely enough people… wasn’t the margin something like 400 people? roughly 12% of the population of minnesota…

  9. 6speedSamurai says:

    Yuck – what did you people do? Al Franken is now a Senator?

    /Yuck!/

  10. David says:

    President Obama, Vice Presidential nominee Palin, now Senator Franken. It’s the year for people with no real political experience to somehow get big political positions.

    • Minnesota is better than your state. says:

      If George W. Bush and his administration is an example of an “experienced politicians,” then I’d rather have inexperienced politicians running this country.

    • FaileV says:

      Did Reagan have any political experience? or Washington (so far as I know, he was a surveyor before he joined the militia, after the war he became president) we’ve had plenty of leaders that have had less than admirable political resumes

      Maybe what we need is some new blood in the system, get some people that haven’t played the big boys game yet, so they don’t play by the old rules.

      • rhorho says:

        Do you mean Reagan before he became California’s Governor?

      • VAdame says:

        How about Eisenhower — never held any elective office other than President!

        • jersey says:

          I Dwight D. Eisenhower, having been appointed a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army under the conditions indicated in this document, do accept such appointment and do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God…

          Guess his first (or subsequent) officer oaths don’t count as experience? Or commanding an army? hmm…

          • rhorho says:

            Second Lieutenant =/= elected office.

            Please re-read VAdame’s post, and search for the word “experience.”

            • Beth says:

              Gee- wasn’t Eisenhower the Commander in Chief of ALL Allied forces in world war 2 Europe? Or would being a “Community Organizer” have meant more?

              • Whiney Green Member says:

                Supreme commander hun, not commander in chief, and military service=/= political experience. You are trying to argue a different point. We are discrediting the idea that if someone does not have extensive ‘political’ background they would not be a good president, senator, whatever. There have been a decent number of presidents that were elected without extensive political backgrounds, some of them were successful military men and that’s fine.
                ~
                Being a successful officer does look more impressive than a community organizer, but that isn’t what the argument is about.

    • Hana says:

      It’s the year where the politicians gave up pretending to give a damn about anyone but themselves. They’re simply getting up there, doing whatever the hell they want, and walking away with the votes.

      maybe NOW that we’ve obviously hit rock bottom, (PRESIDENT Obama, SENATOR Franken??????) America will wake up and realize it’s time to fire ALL the Senators, politicians, etc, and elect people who actually CARE about our country.

      Not holding my breath though…

      • rhorho says:

        Unc’s right: We truly need an eye roll symbol in this place. 9_9

        Please change your mind about holding your breath.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          Of course I’m right…

          but I happen to agree that the only person who ever entered a place of power with a pure motive was that ghastly left footer, Guy Fawkes…

          • rhorho says:

            True that, but this business of “fire everyone because they’re all bad”
            makes no point.

            If you have seen other examples of this ones work, you know why
            I’m suddenly inspired to volunteer at the Family Planning Center.

  11. P says:

    Why is it when the Dems lose, they whine and cry “Recount”?

    Back in 1960, with Nixon/Kennedy, Nixon was asked if he wanted to do a recount, he responded “For the good of the country, I concede the election”… And Kennedy had a 0.2% lead.

    • Oh yes, Nixon… Pinnacle of ethical… waitaminute…

      • P says:

        Kinda more to the point… The sleazy, most questionable Rep, stepped aside…

        And Yes, the recount was automatic, but Franken could of conceded. They asked if he would conceded and he chose to continue with the recount.

        Bush vs Gore. RECOUNT FLORIDA!!!
        Bush vs Kerry. RECOUNT OHIO!!!!

        • FaileV says:

          when fooling the general public all one really needs is a very public altruistic act, for once the general public witnesses ethical behavior they will form their own biases in your favor and all underground dealings will be much simpler and less likely to draw attention. However be sure to destroy all evidence of your dealings as there are still those that will wish to see your downfall and once the public turns against you it is impossible to regain their trust.
          For further information please see pg 45 of the manual
          Warning: Do not hold important “business” discussions in a room and/or building that has voice activated recording software.

        • charro says:

          HAVE. Could HAVE.
          *says to the rest of the PK group*
          Sorry guys, I just can’t stand seeing “could of”. You’d think anyone with at least a fifth grade education could differentiate between could have (which makes sense); and could of, which linguistically and grammatically, IS NONSENSE!!!!
          /end rant

          • rhorho says:

            *reopens rant*
            Perhaps “P” wanted to baffle us with bad use of our language to slip
            in the rest of the nonsense. In order to decipher any point s/he was
            making, I covered “could of” with my thumb, only to find “he would
            conceded” next.

            As for content, I believe “P” is trying to say that Al Franken should
            have given up after the initial count, before the automatic recount
            began. “P” then caps shouted about Gore and Kerry, but my thumb
            slipped, and the “could of” trance began again.

            A+ for consistency of grammar fail, fact fail and opinion fail.

            /end re-rant

            • P says:

              No, just a comment on how it seems that: when a Dem loses, they whine and cry… When Reps lose, they bow out with grace (even the most sleazy, crooked Rep).

              And where is the “fact fail”… Nixon did bow out of the Kennedy/Nixon election of the 60′s. The dems did cry “recount”…

              Ohh opinion can never ‘fail’. You may have a totally different opinion, but I respect that. That’s what makes this nation great. Differences in opinion are encouraged.

              As for “Grammar fail”… Sorry I typed “Could of” over “Could Have”. If this was an English paper, I would of proof read, put out a draft, have others proof it, re-edit, do some technical editing, comprehensive editing, content editing, re-draft, then re-proof it… But this is a informal forum where people often type “ur” instead of “You are” and confuse “loose:Lose” “Your:You’re” “There:Their”, etc.

              And I find when people can’t find a way to argue with logic, they attack spelling/grammar. Just an observation.

              • FaileV says:

                Opinions can fail, we fight wars over them. there are those that were of the opinion that the states should remain a colony, their opinion failed, those that opined that slavery was alright, their opinion failed. those that opined we should kill off undesirable traits leading to the rise of the Aryan race, and their opinion failed.
                There are plenty of opinions that fail, and they are the opinions back by no, or one sided “facts”. Yours for instance has one reference to a republican bowing out, not mentioning a well known republican that did not bow out and took their case to the supreme court. The fact of the matter is that it isn’t just dems that lose so they whine and complain, politicians from all parties have thrown a fit over losing an election in a close margin, even when it isn’t a close margin. Therefore your opinion does fail because it is significantly biasedfor not including all the Reps that have been whiny little brats as well.

              • rhorho says:

                Your content was addressed, following the words “As far as
                content.”

                Your statement about how it *seems* that the opposite side
                whines is valid, but moot in its universality. Your impression
                reflects bias, which is not limited to members of any party.

                Your anecdotal reference to Nixon does not a trend make.
                There are bad winners and sore losers in all shades of the
                political spectrum. There are good winners and gracious
                losers in all shades of the political spectrum.

                Nixon’s campaign could have made its decision based on the
                likely recount results indicated by research to which the public
                was not privy. Based on his later actions, I doubt Nixon would
                have dropped a race he earnestly believed he had a chance
                to win.

                It’s clear that you *wish* Al Franken had conceded before the
                recount. I *wish* Norm Coleman hadn’t continued his pattern
                of suing political opponents.

                Perhaps you and I need to fire our genies.

              • charro says:

                …You mean “would HAVE”
                proof read, put out a draft have others proof it etc.?

              • Eric-in-STL says:

                Well, there’s the thing, though. Franken didn’t lose. He WON. Why on earth would you concede after spending an alarming amount of money and time campaigning for something that you thought you’d won? Bowing out gracefully is fine, if you’ve LOST. If I were Franken, I would’ve done the same. It’s not a bowling tournament, it’s a freaking Senate seat.

                • Jane St.Clair says:

                  Oh! Oh, I’m sooooo sorry! Did you want this Senate seat? I thought it was just lying around waiting for someone to take it. No, no, that’s okay! I mean, if you really really want it I suppose you can have it. What’s that? Automatic recount? Well, I’m sure the people will understand if all the votes aren’t counted. I mean, they weren’t really doing anything else at the beginning of November anyway, why not stand in line and have a say about your elected official. No, I insist, you take it.

              • PortlandMark says:

                So, if you’re statement is correct, (“when a Dem loses, they whine and cry”) then right now, there must be thousands of lawsuits, nationwide, from all the dems who lost elections. Why don’t you look into that and tell us what you discover?

                Also, would you characterize Palin’s complaints about media bias as “bowing out with grace”?

                • rhorho says:

                  Good point! That woman has blamed everyone except
                  herself, and John McCain for choosing her.

                  No, wait: She hasn’t blamed my garden gnome yet…

                • ubr says:

                  palin had her reputation (whatever it was to begin with) demolished by the media. her family was attacked personally. we all knew that she had a kid 4 months ago, we all knew that her daughter was pregnant and the media capitalized on it…
                  what’s really sad is that the media seems to put up this front that it is women’s rights while they completely trashed this woman.
                  the hypocrisy is deafening.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Are you convinced that, had the Obama girls been older,
                    and one of them was pregnant, that nobody on the
                    right would have made anything of it? Please!!

                    This age of 24-hour news has generated a fierce
                    competition for the viewer’s attention. Don’t mistake
                    that atmosphere for partisanship: The media grabs
                    whatever story it can find, based on how many viewers
                    it will attract. Profit beats politics as easily as rock beats
                    scissors.

                    • ubr says:

                      i think it would’ve gotten less media attention due to the fact that the media liked obama way more than palin… i don’t think there’s any need for discussion on that point…
                      .
                      the point i was trying to make is that it is neither the right or the left that seems to do much of the mud slinging anymore, but rather it is the press that bombards the american people with their viewpoint… it’s like a michael moore movie. if you say anything enough times and loud enough then people consider it fact…

        • Tessie says:

          “the recount was automatic, but Franken could of conceded. They asked if he would conceded and he chose to continue with the recount.”
          `
          I suppose he could have, but why should he have? I can see no reason why any candidate, of any party or persuasion, would be opposed to an accurate vote count, unless they know (or strongly suspect) that it would go against them.

    • rhorho says:

      The recount was automatic.

    • Tessie says:

      “Why is it when the Dems lose, they whine and cry “Recount”?”
      `
      As in Bush vs. Gore?

  12. cakeislie says:

    lol! Man… what a really really RLY anachronistic caption… almost forgot he was in SNL.

  13. MushuPork says:

    Franken makes me embarassed to say I’m a Minnesotan. And Motas, do a favor. Ventura was apparently not enough for many Minnesotans to learn a lesson. I think a lot of us realize that. But please, let it go. He embarasses me too.

    • Motas says:

      For the record, I love Minnesota. It’s a second home to me. Whatever type of governor Ventura may have been, I appreciate the good people of MN living up to the ideal of fairness.

  14. dropping in says:

    I know I will get flamed for this- but Franken is actually a fairly good rigorous intellectual/academic when he wants to be- he can often seem like quite the policy wonk…I do agree with his left leaning in many cases, so I am biased- I think he will surprise everyone and be a really great senator that elevates the office.

    • ubr says:

      i don’t think that any of the senators do anything at all… so… if he sucks, oh well. and if he rocks, oh well…

      • FaileV says:

        It’s interesting to watch the senate and the house on TV, when no one is there. I wish I had a job that i didn’t show up to half the time and still didn’t get fired.

      • PortlandMark says:

        “i don’t think that any of the senators do anything at all”

        Then please don’t bother the grown ups when we are discussing politics.

        • Wombatish says:

          No, he’s rather right.
          Ideally, Senators do a lot.
          In practice, the vast majority don’t bother to show up to vote for the largest portion of the year, and rarely introduce measures or even speak before the chamber. (A few are a thankful exception to this rule. And one or two are a not so thankful exception. ((What is it with crazies from Texas? With the initials RP no less?)))
          Stuffing a bill full of pork and then calling it “serving your constituents” does constitute (a pun!) “doing your -real- job as a US Senator.”
          Expediting people’s passports is sadly closer to a true endeavor towards your real job, but not in and of itself, and not when you do it just so they’ll vote for you again and again.

          So please… don’t bother when the educated and informed non-grown ups are discussing politics, we’ve already learned to block you out.

          • Wombatish says:

            **does -not- constitute.

            Dangit

          • rhorho says:

            Sorry, but I can’t make sense of this sentence:

            So please… don’t bother when the educated and informed non-grown ups are discussing politics, we’ve already learned to block
            you out.

            It sounds like you could be saying two opposite things. Looking for
            context is confusing, too. It seems like you start off disagreeing with
            PM, but then you go on to make some good points, with which PM
            would likely agree and/or enjoy discussing.

            Seriously, I’m not confronting you, I’m just having a difficult time
            following what you’re saying. I apologize if I’m just being dense here.

            • Wombatish says:

              PM’s disagreeing with the original comment that “senators don’t do anything”.

              I took his disagreement to mean they do their jobs, their -real- jobs.

              Then I pointed out how in the basest sense, they could be considered to do “something”, but that it’s no where near what they’re actually supposed to be doing.

              As for your quote, I’m mocking PM for his original snark. He implied he was a grown up. I’m telling him I’m not a grown up but that I would care to wager that I could best him, or at least hold my own, when it comes to politics.

              • rhorho says:

                Thank you! I didn’t understand that you were considering
                yourself to be a “non-grown-up,” because you are precocious,
                and therefore easily mistaken for someone older than you
                are.

                Now your post makes sense, but Mark was arguing against
                your use of “anything at all,” using the term “grown-ups” as a
                way to mark the difference between reasonable and
                unreasonable comments. How could he have known your age?

    • AtlasShrugged says:

      If you bother to read one of his whiney books, you wouldn’t have voted for him ( I read part of one at the dentist’s office, then asked for some nausea medicine).

      • Seth says:

        I’ve read his books. They beat the snot out of anything Ayn Rand’s ever written. He backs up his whines with cold, hard facts. I think it was the facts that were giving you that nausea. Facts often don’t sit well with Rand fanatics. You may want to avoid them in the future, I’m sure your fantasy world is far more comfortable for you.

        • Seth says:

          Man, that was harsh. Sorry. I was over at dailyKos, arguing with the so-called progressives, and it got me all riled up. Check it: a bunch of progressive bloggers use this commercial, for profit software/hosting provider, SoapBlox. It’s crap, it got hacked, and they never kept proper backups. So they were begging for money on the front page. To fix problems with a for profit web hosting provider. Problems that any competent provider never would have had in the first place. I tried to tell them they were being scammed, that the going rate for hosting is about $5/month, not $15, for their tiny bandwidth needs. And there are plenty of free packages out there that are more secure, with more features. How do you suppose that went down? Yeah, I got torn a new one. Sometimes I’m embarrassed to identify as progressive.

          • rhorho says:

            I’m sorry, Seth! I hope you feel better soon!

            *pours Seth some hot tea*
            *hides junk letter from Progressive Insurance*
            *slips Tucks Pads and butterfly bandaids into Seth’s shave kit*

          • Musicmom870 says:

            You know how this crowd rallies ’round the regulars? I think that’s what you ran into there. I’ll see if I can find you there and show some support.

          • dissimilitude says:

            Sounds like the progressives are regressing.

        • AtlasShrugged says:

          Uh, Seth…You may want to up the dose of your antidepressants- you’re getting emotional in your whining again.

        • Wombatish says:

          While I like Franken, I don’t think it’s fair to compare him to Rand.

          (I like Rand too, but I accept it as fictional literature / philosophy from a woman who may or may not have had Syphilis eating away at her brain for a portion of her life; and who, regardless of her mental state, I disagree with, at least slightly.)

          • Jane St.Clair says:

            I don’t think Seth was comparing Franken with Rand so much as responding to a statement about the quality of Franken’s books by a person who obviously likes Rand enough to name himself after one of her books.

    • PortlandMark says:

      I think Minnesotans are lucky to get him. They’ll see soon.

    • Seth says:

      The left currently outnumbers the right on this board. I doubt you’ll get flamed for stating what the majority of us feel. And you admit your bias, that makes you totally cool in the eyes of regulars both conservative and liberal, if I’m any judge of the regulars here.

  15. CGS says:

    I have faith that he’ll be just as good a senator as he is a comedian.

    • Hana says:

      LOL. Which should be easy. He sucked as a comedian too.

      • rhorho says:

        Yeah. Hur-Hur! That’s why he was a popular regular on SNL, went on to host a wildly successful radio show, went on seven USO tours and wrote five NY Times best-sellers, three of which hit #1.

        • FaileV says:

          but he didn’t make any really great fart jokes.

        • Mike says:

          Wildly successful radio show ?!! WTF? “AirAmerica” was a friggin’ disaster ! He went under because no one listened to it! Propaganda anyone ?

          • rhorho says:

            **Third Attempt. Apologies if others ever show up.**

            Fact Fail: Air America is alive and well.

            • froofrou says:

              Technically, Mike didn’t say the RADIO STATION went under, he said that Franken isn’t on there anymore because no one listened to him. I think. I’m trying to decipher troll-speak here, and with all the squeaking and whining it’s hard to make out actual words.

              • rhorho says:

                He used the past tense: ““AirAmerica” was a friggin’ disaster!”

                According to Wiki:

                Franken signed a one-year contract in early 2004 to become a talk show host for Air America Radio’s flagship program with cohost Katherine Lanpher, who remained with the show until October 2005. The network was launched March 31, 2004. Originally named The O’Franken Factor but renamed The Al Franken Show on July 12, 2004, the show aired three hours a day, five days a week for three years. The show’s apparent aim was to counter the dominance of conservative syndicated radio commentators that Franken believed strayed from the truth with impunity, and to affect the U.S. political atmosphere. “I’m doing this because I want to use my energies to get Bush unelected,” he told a New York Times reporter in 2004.[23]

                Franken is a Grateful Dead fan, and used their songs as bumper music on his radio show. Franken’s last radio show on Air America Radio was on February 14, 2007. In the last segment of the show, Franken announced his candidacy for the United States Senate.

                [LINK] Full Wiki article

          • PortlandMark says:

            “Was”? You are unaware that it’s a going, and growing, concern?

  16. Boris says:

    From the state that brought you Governor Jesse “The Body” Ventura…

  17. ohno says:

    Bullsh1t. Epic Fail.

  18. Johnathan says:

    McCain did SNL, now SNL does the Senate. Hopefully SNL’ers are better Senators than Senators are SNL’ers

  19. Mehallya says:

    There has been one recount it was automatic do to the margin won by. Jessie was elected as what we hoped was the least of all the evils presented that year. Finally Barkley should have been elected in my point of view I went to a debate between the three. Barkley was the one who talked about the issues the most rather than his opponents. One reason Coleman is suing is because some weird things have been talked about when it comes to the recount. Such as Franken getting votes for frankenstein and other odd things. I personally would just like to have this all done and over with. If they want they can flip a coin.

    • Tessie says:

      “Barkley should have been elected in my point of view”
      `
      This immediately made me picture Charles Barkley. So very wrong, and yet it feels right…

  20. neverpostedbefore says:

    While they’re probably both crooks, as it seems the majority of politicians are nowadays, I think there is some amount of hilarity in these results! Here’s a quote from a local Twin Cities news station website article…quoting Coleman!

    “Yesterday the voters spoke. We prevailed,” Coleman said at a news conference. He noted that Franken could opt to waive the recount. “It’s up to him whether such a step is worth the tax dollars it will take to conduct,” Coleman said, telling reporters he would “step back” if he were in Franken’s position trailing in the vote.”

    And now that the results are “final” and he’s in Franken’s former shoes, he’s suing…Oh, politicians!

    Rest of the article can be found here
    http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=528816&catid=2

  21. ascatal says:

    this whole senate election fiasco almost makes me ashamed to be from Minnesota

  22. fishamaphone says:

    Dear Minnesota,

    Now you know how we feel.

    Regards,
    Florida

  23. Casey says:

    And we’re not bitter.

  24. NoKoolAidHere says:

    Al Franken is a fat, whiney, Liberal loser who sues and cries when he doesn’t get what he wants- which makes him a perfect Democrat.

    • LotsanLotsaKoolAid says:

      YOU’RE A POOPHEAD!!!!1!!!
      YOU’RE A PERFECT CONSERVATIVE!!!!

      • Roy says:

        Please go back to Webkinz, where you rightfully belong. None of the insults you idiots used are acceptable to any extent in the post-21 (otherwise known as Adult, Mature) niche of the internet, which is the only niche that can make a valid political argument.

  25. Gargonzilla says:

    None of you tards know what you talking about. He’s a clown. An idiot. Unfit for office. We need smart leadership, and we get him. He really doesn’t even live in MN. I live there, and I know that a good portion of the people who “voted” for him couldn’t fill in an oval. I’m angry at how our system has failed us, and hope for change so we can get real men in the office.

  26. Jake says:

    FRANKEN SUCKS BALLS

    • Uncle Fester says:

      SO, it was YOU that Larry Craig was looking for…

      • Mike says:

        So how do Franken”s hemmorrhoids taste when you’re kissing his rear end ?
        (Frankens Hemmorrhoids? Sounds like a good rock band name)

        • froofrou says:

          Fester doesn’t swing that way, but he might be interested to hear your thoughts on receiving a reach-around while taking it from the Right. Finger-lickin’ good, I’m sure.

          • rhorho says:

            Don’t go all power-mad on us, froo, but that was teh Awesome!!

          • Beth says:

            Didn’t someone once call you a “Uncle Tom Republican”?
            I now see what they mean!

            • froofrou says:

              It’s people like you who make my side look bad. If you can’t present an argument without profanity and name-calling, I’m going to call you down regardless of what side you’re on.
              -
              You are a troll. You need to come back when you know what a cite is, what a source is, and exactly what ‘Uncle Tom (whatever)’ means. Your lack of knowledge is a painful thing to behold.
              -
              There is nothing wrong with playing nice. I suggest you find a sandbox somewhere else and try it.

              • Beth says:

                That’s it- be a good little Uncle Tom and attack the conservatives for the Liberals. Now go on back to your masters- they have a treat for you!

                • froofrou says:

                  And the derogatory stupidity starts.
                  -
                  I’m attacking you because you’re stupid, not because you’re conservative.
                  -
                  You, on the other hand, are a perfect example of why people won’t listen when certain conservatives speak. Hate speech is hate speech no matter who it comes from, and when you attack, spew vile and venom, and then expect NOT to be treated like the idiot that you are, then it proves that you have no clue how to interact with others.
                  -
                  Make sure you get that helmet your mother gave you fitted a little better. I think it’s slipping, and we sure don’t want you to get more brain damage. What you have now will certainly assure you a seat in Congress.

                • rhorho says:

                  *giggles and points at the convection waves of ignorance
                  over Beth’s fool head*

          • Tessie says:

            “receiving a reach-around while taking it from the Right”
            `
            Now THERE’s a mental picture I could have done without!

  27. Nulono says:

    Senate seat good, FIRE BAD!

  28. RoyPundit says:

    Ha, Senator Frankenstein. Totally looks like one.

    *Heads directly to TotallyLooksLike*

  29. Rotten Jack says:

    Minnesota is a joke state poloitically. First Jesse Ventura, now Al Franken. Who’s next, Carrot Top?

  30. NoKoolAidHere says:

    ALL of the other captions were funnier than this one..What gives ?

  31. Wombatish says:

    Here’s an idea, stfu and deal. It’s one thing to discuss it, it’s another to just whine or rant incessantly.

    People get screwed every day in this great land of ours, why should this be any different? We’re to partisan to get anything done, and we’re too partisan to properly change.

    Even if one side thinks they’ve changed, it’s just more of the same for the other side.

    AND we can’t come together, either. Each side wants everyone else to ‘come over to -their- side of the table’.

    I’m just so sick of politics, but I’m so much sicker (sic) of the people who talk about politics.

    Especially the Johnny-come-latelys who’ve only been sucked in by the recent upsurge in coverage and action. (I could be considered a Johnny-come-lately, I suppose, but by birth not by choice!)

    • Wombatish says:

      *too

      And this is a rare deviation from my: “No ranting and raving rule”… the fact that this image has 400+ comments even as it moves down the page is very beh.

      But then again, I’m only adding to the problem, which is usually what happens in this country.

      I’m just going to sit in a corner and practice controlling my thought crime while I chant “Two legs good, four legs bad”.

  32. John says:

    It’s funny how they can declare anyone a winner when there are 255 more votes that have been counted than there are registered voters. Strange. They must have really got out the vote. Maybe there were some ACORNs…

  33. Robert says:

    Woo-hoo! The old “Recount until you can ‘find’ enough ballots to win” strategy strikes again!

  34. Pirate77 says:

    Hi. Franken sucks.

  35. AtlasShrugged says:

    And to think- it all started with “Liberal Tolerance”.
    Point proven.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Well, that was apropos of nothing…

    • Uncle Fester says:

      And would you care to comment on Conservative family values? Or perhaps the resounding silence of dear of Junkie Bill’s oxycodone prescription collection in various names? Your poster boy would have been howling for any body’s head over that, save his own…

      Want to whine about hypocrisy, try cleaning out your own side first…

  36. Mac says:

    Franken beans!

  37. MNGirl says:

    Psst, he isn’t Senator yet.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up