I know you did it. Stop spitballing the back of my head…
(Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: DeathWyrmNexus
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Sergei instantly regretted the playful tushie-grab. | Take this Sgt Wilson! Next »
I know you did it. Stop spitballing the back of my head…
» 296 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Bob the eternally un… on Undercover Loss Gutt on 90s Jokes Wyt on 90s Jokes Doveswing on Seems Legit Whatever on And Then There Was One Byt on Aww, Nicknames! Whatever on Undercover Loss Whatever on Undercover Loss Geary on Undercover Loss Whatever on Undercover Loss 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Every Minute of Every Day
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
Itz way past
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Goggie GIF: Snack time? Or nap time?
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Ever Thought About Going into Medicine?
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Take That, Schrodinger
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
And Here We Have the Wild Barfing Rainbow Monkeys of Borneo
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Pile of Otters
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
Paul Revere Approves
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Happy Cat is in Pizza Heaven
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Gives New Meaning to 'Going Commando'
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Nicolas Cage is Watching You Read
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Gai-sensei Totally Looks Like Jim Croce
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Switcheroo Animal Pocket Knife
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Oh The Insectanity
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
Bambi Stool
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
A Clinton never forgets.
This is why it was wise to give her a job in which out of the country 60% of the time…
Everyone lives to see their grand kids…
Clinton’s ORLY??-like face does it
Plus Obama’s slightly-PO’d face.
I love her crazy faces.
DWN!!! Great Caption!!
I lol’d!
Me too! Way to go, DWN!
Grats DWN!
I concur, way to go DWN!!!!
Although, one picture on the front page and we can look the other way. Now that you have two pictures, you’ve completely destroyed your underground cred.
Yep. He’s a total mainstream sell-out now. Three more years, and he’ll
have a steady gig in Branson.
Move over, Donny!
Truly, I lol’d as well. Excelllleeeennntttt.
BTW and OT; does anyone else wonder if the Osmond family has stock in Entertainment Tonight? Seriously, they are ALWAYS ON.
not that I watch
I seriously can’t sit through that show. Have you seen a show called Chelsea Lately? It’s on “E!” If you haven’t seen it, Chelsea Handler, the hostess, is as quick-witted as Kathy Griffin, imo.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, can’t decide which, we do not have cable. I would like to have the History and Discovery Channel back but there are PLENTY of other distractions in the house – I can’t afford cable fiscally or time-wise.
I like how quick Kathy Griffin is but she sometimes tries way too hard to be schocking, imo.
[LINK] has a list of her latest quips. If you click on the
“main” tab, you can see some video clips.
Enjoy!!
To answer your dilemma: fortunately. The longer you go without, the less you want it. I’ve been cable-free over 3 years now, and am happy to be free of my tv addiction!
.
Makes charades kinda hard sometimes, though.
DOH!!!!
Yeah, pretty soon it’ll be t-shirts and bumper stickers… what a sell-out!
>.>
Oddly enough I had a guild that wanted me to design T-shirts for them. >_<
But I’m still hardcore! Honest! They haven’t bought me yet!
Uh, DWN? Why are you holding up a can of Pepsi?
That isn’t what they call “product placement,” is it?
O_O
It isn’t mine!!! I am just, um just… Erm.. Holding it for Diss! She is the one with the big sponsor.
*covers Nike T-shirt, Rolex watch, and runs covering Abercrombie logo’d jeans*
I NO SELL OUT! I STILL COOL!
Not Pepsi, dammit! Diet Coke. Or Diet Mountain Dew. I’m still ready to sell out, and they still aren’t offering me anything but bottle caps that say “Please try again”.
Sorry to hear that… Still not my Pepsi… *swigs*
DWN!!! You drank my pepsi!!!
After I gave you cupcakes too.
*buys charro a pepsi*
*slams pepsi*
OoooOohohooo caffeine buzz
Somehow, I see DWN fronting a whole different class of products… stuff to be used in bed, or perhaps with a penis.
“Do you, or somebody you know, often find yourself in discussions ruined by claims of Nazism? Try new DeathWang from NexusCorp!”
LMAO… priceless
No, not priceless. 6.99 plus shipping and fondling.
Don’t forget folding and spindling!
That’s a different product. We make sure not to fold the wang.
“I’m still hardcore! Honest! They haven’t bought me yet!”
`
I will never sell out unless someone offers me money.
Any fool can know their value. A wise man knows his price…
I’m just a wise fool then.
The Cretin King, tushie xxx
DWN FTW!! Yay!
Ugh. How is this remotely funny? Next …
It’s called “sense of humor” WIN for DWN!
That’s funny, I thought the intellectually challenging ICHC captions were on another page …
At least you see humor in something. There’s hope.
Hope for whom? Even my 10- and 13-year-olds failed to find this amusing. If it weren’t the work of a serial commenter the majority of you wouldn’t, either.
Awwwwwwwww, it’s cute how bitter and angry you are. Cheerleaders turn you down for dates in high school, huh?
I’m impressed you are able to (erroneously) ascertain my level of animosity from a blog thread. Perhaps you have a future at the Psychic Friends Network?
Except not so much. We didn’t have male cheerleaders in my high school, and my disagreement regarding the humor level of a submission isn’t necessarily indicative of my “bitter” and “anger.” Let’s save that for the gun-clingers, isolationists and bible-thumpers, yes?
C’mon now, Jane, I have followed, with great amusement and, dare I say, a few LOLs, your commentary for quite some time. Fess up. This submission is appropriate in other forums, but from what I have read you expect a certain degree of post-adolescent humor in submissions on this page.
Or perhaps I am mistaken. Just an observation.
Some people find this funny. I did.
Some people didn’t find this funny. You didn’t.
Sit back and relax…the next will eventually come along.
Let the rest of us, who want to, enjoy it without trying to
make us feel like ShamWow imitators.
Unless I am mistaken, this is a public forum wherein I said I didn’t find this particular submission amusing. You said you did, and in the process questioned my sense of humor. I wouldn’t have elaborated were it not for the fact that my observation was called into question. Rest assured, I don’t want to detract from your level of amusement. I also appreciate your candor, but I do indeed have a sense of humor, and it’s appropriate to a specific forum. I am currently LOLing, along with my pre- and teenaged children, to the oh-so-enjoyable “Joe Dirt.” Sigh.
Wow. I have more of a sense of humor than you– I have more
fun than you, I’m less suck-up than you, and I’m neurotic!
God, do you have a boulder up your butt or something?
Well, good for you.
*pat pat*
Aren’t you just special!
And less suck up too.
Suck up to whom, exactly?
I must say, your handle is apropos to your posting ability. Coochie-coochie coo.
I haven’t seen Joe Dirt yet. Let me know how it was.
It’s actually hilarious (if you enjoy the white trashiness of David Spade in this role), particularly the meteor scene. As a teen of the ’80s, I have to admit an affinity to the mullett, as well as the musical score of the flick. My apologies for the sigh — as a parent of teens and tweens I have seen it so darn many times I have a tendency to tune it out. It’s worth a watch just for the Jerry Springer-ish LOLs.
BTW, thank you.
Thanks for the heads-up. I’ll have to give it a look see.
@Sardonic: Charro explained it to me a
while back. The “coochie-coochie coo” one
is Charo, with only one “r.”
@Sardonic:
Are you always rude to anyone who makes a comment after yours?
Or do you become childishly insulting and feel the urge to throw around $20 words when you miss the complete obvious?
Re read the post before your original one, followed by yours, perhaps it will become clear.
I hope that you can lower your defenses long enough to see I was gently poking fun at Airigh, and said nothing negative in your direction.
That is, unless of course you think being “suck-up” is a good thing..And my stating you are not suck up was somehow off-putting to you.
But I doubt it.
And rho is correct, Charo of coochie coochie fame has one “r”.
Incidently, “Charro” is not a handle; it is my actual nickname IRL that I have taken a fancy to. People have used this name to address me for about 8 years, but that was a good try.
@charro: Sardonic is new to posting here. She started out rough, like most of us did, but she’s getting better RAPIDLY. IMO, she was riled in reaction to some other posts, and came across harsher than she probably thought she did. I don’t want to speak for her, but think she may have missed the “suck up” joke you were directing at Airigh.
She can has slack, please?
My apologies. Seriously.
What a bore you are, Sardonic.
I found it hilarious – and I didn’t need comments to tell me it was funny.
Uh… what? People do juvenile humor here all the time.
Wanna get grumpy about something? They’re objectifying Selma Hayek over at ROFLRazzi again. Have fun.
but she has such great assets to objectify!
Seconded…
oooooOOOOOOOOOooooooooo! Boobies!
Delicious boobie!!!
Don’t try an act innocent. You did not simply say you found something unamusing. You implied that not only was it not funny, but it was intellectually inferior and that the only reason the majority of the people on here liked it was because DWN post a lot. You went out of your way to be insulting and superior and I treated your posts with MY opinion of how you were acting. No one says you don’t have the right to your opinion, but don’t be surprised when people think that you sound like a sanctimonious snot.
Hell a number of these people, I don’t even talk to regularly.
Though I do recognize a few names in passing.
Personally, I love it when I’m finally pushed to be snarky (and it seems to only happen when I’m defending my friends) I get fed the “I expected better of you” line. Like THAT would make me feel guilty.
I expected better than this from you Jane.
In… nevermind. Carry on.
@Charro: Bork you, you nizzlefluting sifnuta!
GAH!!! Jane!! You used all my insults.
I felt you deserved the best.
Actually, I didn’t realize it was DWN’s until I started reading the comments. And I thought it was funny.
Ditto.
Oh, so your children are humorless bastards too? Must be something in the genes.
THAT’S ENOUGH! Calling my children bastards is totally out of control; if you think it’s okay your priorities are completely screwed. I may not like Obama’s politics, but I would NEVER go after his kids, even though they are on the national stage. I’d also NEVER go after yours.
All this hate because I said I didn’t find something funny. And all these names for the same reason.
I have watched you all spew whatever venom you want over the past several months, but I make ONE SMALL OBSERVATION and you INSULT MY CHILDREN!This is absolutely disgusting. I won’t be back (and I don’t have the first idea who um … hhnsardonic? It can’t be a cooincidence, The histrionics are too similar) even IS. It makes me physically ill to have to defend my CHILDREN because they didn’t find something AMUSING.
Call me whatever name you want, just LEAVE MY CHILDREN ALONE!
Wow… So glad I can bring people together… -_-
She has a kid named Brittany?
You continue to rock.
LMAO. I’m slow, I just got that
Hah! Nice one. Alas, my own reply to Miss Megaton has been eaten by the filter, hopefully it will resurface at some point. Really, you’d think that a synonym for a mule would be fair game on a political website… *sigh*
Are you saying that PK eats ass?
And the childish pusbags win again !!!!
No, you lost.
Oh look, a sock.
Maybe you shouldn’t mention your children and their ages on an internet forum designed to make fun of serious things if you don’t want them made fun of. This is something we call common sense.
She said she was leaving, and that’s good. It’s probly enough.
She said she was leaving, then made about three or four new posts denigrating other people. I don’t call that leaving. I call that throwing gasoline on a fire and watching it burn higher.
Im not defending her, but I was wondering where those are so I can find them and read them to.
Please don’t be mad at me for asking.
Keep scrolling, they’re near the bottom.
Can you tell me the times? I’m sorry. Did she change her naem or something? THis posting is today at 4:40 and I can’t see the rest.
here’s one
Thanks froo, I was on the search, but you’re faster than me.
Here’s another. She’s not snarky, but it’s clearly after she said she was leaving.
Thanks and how ist that denigrating (is that making fun of) other people? I’m just wondering so I can understand for sure.
Like I said, she wasn’t snarky, but it was clearly after she said she was leaving. I was mistaken in my previous assessment that she was denigrating in all of her posts, but she’s done this before. She went all mental on us at first, got a little bit of support in that she was asked to calm down, she calmed down, and then went psycho again. We can’t trust her at this point.
“I’m just wondering so I can understand for sure.”
Well froo already said it wasn’t snarky. If you want to defend her then defend her (I don’t know WHY but whatever, it’s your deal) but the wide-eyed innocent thing is starting to get old.
Thanks for all that so I can read it. My mom reads this place for fun and she hasnt posted and dosen’t know I’m telling you she’s not bad, and I’m aloud to look at this place because my mom thinks its educational and I can learn from the posting of others; she’s not meanand she has pasison. She showed me this LOL last night, we look at these all the time because politics, LOLdogs and the failblog are funny and we talk about these things so I can learn. I did not mean to hurt any person’s feelings and mom isn’t the kind of person who is just mean for no reason. We also like the nostalgic win because its about her childhood. She’s not perfect, but she’s nice, she loves me and we read alot, play games and she’s nice. I know you will all make fun of me and my mom win I put this up, and call her names again if you are mad at me, but just so you know there are real peopl e who are nice and not perfect. Its okay for you to say things and It doesn’t hurt me, I have self esteem and mom says its okay to lisen to others but not enternalize there opinions for no reason.
Don’t be mad that I rote this mom. I love you anyways.
Reen, you are a wonderful, precious and precocious young lady, and we’ll discuss this when I get home tonight.
I received this and instantly recognized what it was, and from whom it originated, via email. I am asking with all the dignity I can muster, please direct your replies to my email address, which I will post below. I promise I will continue to lurk, as I always have, and never post again if you all would just grant me this favor. Please. She loves ICHC and all its sub-sites.
Thank you for your consideration.
Please direct all emails to heatherjlc@hotmail.com
Thank you.
A heartfelt thank you. She’s in bed. Please feel free to always reply via email. I do appreciate your continued consideration.
I wish we could believe the trolls, but their records speak against them. I would ask Rho how her rehabilitation project is going, but I think she’s missing a few fingers. Oh, and btw: *HUGS* Sorry you has a sad, hope you feel better soon.
I said the chain mail boning gloves over kevlar didn’t work…
I think she chewed through her restraints.
@Jane, Unc, and froo: I’m retiring. Seth can
have his job back. The clawing, chewing and
kicking were bad enough, but the Blanche
DuBois business at the end had me chewing
my own fingers off, to distract from the pain.
Ah’ve alus been rahlaint ahn th’ kahndniss urv strayngers…
(flickers eyelids)
I thought it was more ‘Camille’ but Tennessee Williams is close enough for jazz
You brought them into it to begin with. Perhaps, if you’d like them left out of future discussions, you shouldn’t use them to support your arguments.
Now wipe the spittle off your chin and your monitor, sit down, and shut the hell up before you make yourself look even more of an ass.
I believe that ship sailed around the same time that Homo Sapien decided to walk erect, n8. She’s done for on this site unless she makes apologies and behaves, as far as I’m concerned.
Aye, yet another thing upon which we’re agreed. Scary times.
Still, I’m certain that for all her claims of not coming back, we’ll see her again soon under a new name (fooling nobody.) It’s the nature of the breed, they can’t help it.
I hereby dub this type of troll the HHNSardonic, and shall hereafter be seen as silly, and not worth our time! Except for when we want to make fun of it
That’s good for three.
Wow, you win the whiny b1tch award. Did you seriously just have a crybaby meltdown on a web forum? Oh noes! The internets has insulted me!
I hope for the world’s sake your kids aren’t as whiny as you are.
I know I said I wouldn’t post again, and I really won’t, but I want you to know that what you said here deeply affected a nice little girl who is allowed to visit this site since it has been deemed age apropriate (with my oversight, for the most part). I honestly thought it was, and have sat with all my kids LOLing over the submissions and comments for a couple of years.
This really hurts. Yep, I am ridiculous that I am still crying because my precious little girl, who epitomizes all that is good and right in the world, got to read on one of her favorite sites that she is a humorless bastard due to the fact you felt compelled to denigrate her in an effort to punish her mother for what you and others deemed inappropriate. Congratulations; if that was your intent, it was an epic win on your part.
Save your animosity. I’m not trying to make anyone feel guilty, or punished, or whatever. Please just think before you post something such as this. You can say all you want that it’s my fault because I said my kids didn’t find the submission humorous, I’m a bad person, etc. but I never digressed into name calling of anyone, and I did not post anything derogatory that would adversely affect an innocent.
Please, I’m serious. It’s really not funny, but laugh all you want about how I’m retarded, and psychotic, and boring, and stupid, and humorless, and childish, and … just read through the comments and it’s already been said.
If you don’t have a 10-year-old, I hope you do someday. It’s well worth the time, patience and love. It’ll make you crazy to see her cry over something about which you didn’t mean for her to ever know. And even crazier to know she loves you enough to defend you on a public website for the whole world to see, just because she’s proud of you wants the world to know you as she does.
Again, save it. I know you don’t care, and you want to tell me what a wuss I am, and how stupid, and worthless, and what a bad parent, and whatever. I already know, and don’t need your response to solidify it. I just needed to get this off my chest, so I can go to bed tonight tear-free and able to breathe.
This isn’t an attack, okay? I think you’re taking this way
too hard. If you have lurked PK for a while, you know that
n8′s comment was relative par for this course. He meant
“bastard” figuratively, as best as I can interpret.
As for letting children read PK comments, I wish you would
reconsider. Some of the tangential discussions are neither
intended nor suitable for young readers.
As for your decision not to post, I think it’s wise. You are
extremely sensitive, and posting requires a thick skin.
Wow- you really are a B*tch aren’t you? That’s why you spend so much time on here belittling people- you have no friends in the real world either.
Way to miss the point, Mike. Where is she being b*tchy? Rho was the only person nice to this waste of space.
OH! I was looking for that sock! I thought it got lost in the dryer.
Well then, good job bringing her into it in the first place! And now you’re hiding behind her. Seriously, get help. I’m done with you.
Formula for suck:
Invite oneself to be pwnen8ed.
Get pwnen8ed.
Whine about it.
Hide behind children.
…
Wait, are you Sarah Palin?
Hahahahahhahahahhaa PWND!!
This is the last I’ll say on the matter: Your ability to put events in perspective is lacking. Seek psychiatric help. Please.
Can she room with you?
I second the win.
Thank you.
Thirded!
I dunno, call me crazy but she is behind him and he has a properly annoyed look on his face. I happen to find childish antics in those with power mildly funny because of the dichotomy presented. I am sorry that I did not meet your high end, Joe Dirt level of humor. Many apologies. I’ll go sulk in my corner that I didn’t make a scatological joke for you.
but can you make a scatological joke now? i feel that i have missed them of late…
That would be very sh*tty timing of me but I will see what I can do before I fling something on the page here.
I can has fart jokes plz?
Ooh! Ooh! I just thought of a fart joke/alternate caption:
`
“Jeez, Hillary, WARN a person when you’re about to cut one!!”
did somebody tread on a duck?
Do you really want to live in a world where you are surrounded by “yessers,” in which everyone nods dumbly and compliments you rather than offering an honest opinion?
I don’t. I disagreed with the humor factor, and that’s it. I didn’t make a personal statement about you, your politics, the circumstances into which you were born, the maritial status of your parents, your age, your intellect …
I thought it was right and proper to post your opinion on any submission here. I can see it’s wrong, and this site exists for the sole purpose of allowing a certain element of society a gathering place in which to huzzah and back-clap one another.
There should be an appropriate disclaimer.
Um, on what planet did I say that you can’t post your opinion? On what planet can I not retort when I am told my humor isn’t up to scatology. I defended my lol. How is that a problem?
You told me that I only one because I comment here often. You told me that my humor wasn’t up to the standards of a middle schooler and lack intellectual merit for humor. Call me crazy but that is more than a tad insulting. So I responded.
Why are you assuming that I would come on here and Yesser you? Is it honestly so beyond you that I might take offense to saying that I didn’t earn this tiny bit of regard. Hypocrisy, you has it. Freedom to post means freedom to be ridiculed. Enjoy your freedom as I am enjoying mine. You don’t agree and I don’t agree right back. Both are equal.
For a parent, you really need to grow up. I didn’t question anything about your marital status, politics, children, etc, etc. I simply took offense that you said I didn’t earn my front page .001 seconds of acclaim because I had some inside connection. So you basically said I cheated. So yes, you have an opinion and I have a right to be offended. Nothing is going to come of it. Is there any other whining you would like to do?
*only won.
Stupid grammar fail.
The rest of it was Win though. The Romans had a saying… “Non illigitimi carborundum est.”
DWN – Poo jokes… you should do more. I always found the Marquis De sade a rich vein of humour in that direction.
Truly made me LOL. WIN.
perfect faces for this caption. absolutely brilliant shot.
Very nice caption. Now I’m wondering what the exchange was really about!
Great caption!! This one really made me chuckle
Nice one! As said, the faces really make the caption even better. Good job DWN!
WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER!
No “Tingle ” down her leg, I guess……….
Then again, maybe she was pointing out his 8 million dollar beach house rental, $50,000,000 upcoming inauguration party and the hypocrisy of his latest statment on how we’re all gonna ” have to show some skin and sacrifice” to straighten out the economy. That would explain the look on his face.
Flame on, bitter people!
Preach it, Reverend! Whooooot!
Sounds to me like you’ve had plenty of Kool-Aid….
But you’re right. Despite having had a life in Hawaii, Obama should be happy just staying home or traveling without his security detail… I mean, it’s not like there’s anyone out there that wishes him ill… And screw the arrangements to accommodate all those people that want to celebrate what they feel is a momentous occasion in U.S. history, especially the ones who feel they helped contribute to it. That money could be better spent insuring more post-administration jobs for Bush’s flunkies or bailing out more privileged elites, right?
exactly, all the underlings that would be taking service jobs totally wouldn’t spend the money they got at the inauguration, to later be spent by others and so on. That sort of local economic boost would be darn silly.
Are you serious? After all the “hope and change,” “yes we can,” and “spread the wealth” hype? Let those who can afford it party hearty on their own dime, and give the rest to feed, clothe and shelter those who supported the whole notion of “hopeychange,” “yessycan,” and “spreadywealth.”
Let the Obamessiah practice what he has preached — loaves and fishes for all. Otherwise, pfffttttt.
Uhh.. you do realize the DNC is paying for the inauguration, not the tax-payer, right?
Or do you just like mocking things without researching them? Because that’s what I’m getting from your posts…
Do you suppose they are manufacturing money too? Because if not, then the money ultimately comes from the taxpayer.
Bottom lining it, FTW.
fail. private donations are not public taxes. one you choose to give, you understand that, right?
Fail. Private donations come from taxpayers.
Or win: Private donations come from tax-dodging criminals.
Whatever. Both national parties recieve public funding. No denying that.
What’s your point, then?
“Public funding” and “private funding” are different
terms for a reason. You’re confusing the terms,
making your point moot. Through your eyes, nothing
privately funded is not also publicly funded. The rest
of us understand the difference. The fact that private
funding comes from people who also pay taxes is a no-
brainer.
Actually, I not only understand the difference, I work with it daily. I was just underlining that realistically, there’s not any difference, since we donate funds to a candidate based on our assumptions of his/her ideology regarding spending said funds. But do rest assured, public funds pay for a substantial amount of the underlying cost of any inauguration.
My point was, and is, put your money where your mouth is. I would have great respect for our incoming president if he did so.
Okay, good. Now we’re clear. Froo made a good
point about public funds used that are related to
the festivities, so I won’t repeat her.
That only leaves one matter: If all inaugurations
cost taxpayer dollars, then why should this one
be any different? Should Obama ask for that no
ceremony be held because of the dire state of
the economy? The inauguration is a celebration
of the achievements of more than just one
person. That reality may not be convenient for
you, but I’m sure you wouldn’t be in such a
tailspin if McCain were the honoree.
On a sidenote, I’m glad to see you’ve settled
down a bit.
Yes I would. It’s like the Big Three showing up in private jets to beg for a bailout.
Excellent apples and oranges comparison.
By this logic, shouldn’t they expect that Bush refuse to take his presidential pension?
There’s a few of us who’d like to see Bush on trial in Den Haag, but I’m more likely to get a visit from a cheap accountant,, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny before that happens…
With dancing girls to give you head while they give you chocolate, presents, and free monetary advice…
“Actually, I not only understand the difference, I work with it daily.”
`
Insert generic “youngest supervisor ever” snark here.
And if you don’t believe me you can totally check it out on the internet!
You know, it *would* have made a nice change of pace. But it is too simplistic. Speaking as someone who isn’t exactly rolling in the Benjamins, when you aren’t sure where your next money is coming from, how much there is or even if you will get any, you tend to spend it when you get it. Considering that the underlying structure of our economy is a mess and the money spent would as likely go to, say, China as to elsewhere in this country, what’s the point in just handing it out? In six months everyone will be just as poor as they were before.
A priori assumption that anyone here has ‘a point’
It’s up with ‘Shania Twain – Why?’
‘Shania Twain – Why?’
`
Because her name has the potential for disgusting puns and/or anagrams?
To me, TWAIN is the scanner driver standard… but (and this is a personal opinion) the woman is a marginal talent who really can’t carry a tune in a bucket…
There is more that goes into an inauguration than simply the party. There is crowd control, cleaning up afterwards, extra security, God knows what else the city has to put up with, all funded by taxpayers. The cake and booze are provided by the DNC, but that’s not the whole expense.
-
Now, bearing in mind that this is a historical inauguration, I suppose I can jump down off my right-wing high horse for a minute and give the expense a pass, but just bear in mind that it’s not just private donations paying for these things.
did you complain the expense in 2000 and 2004?
Not in here, no. I think it’s all silly, personally. And unnecessary.
Made getting out of DC HELL in 2001… that and three planes catching fire on me… I just wanted to go the Hell home… and everyone else wanted to go to the party… I have a Bush-Cheney shot glass…
How apropos! Although I’d prefer a Bush-Cheney commemorative shotgun shell — HEH.
And I concur. Get down to the business of governing our nation; big-shot party be damned.
They take a dim view of that as hand luggage.
Least back then they didn’t has GSR sniffing at airports… just American ailines planes spontaneously combusting
Now… if we could extend that to the rest of population and get that opinion about the whole of the electoral race, then we’d be cooking with gas…
Circular argument. As in, since money ultimately circulates through the economy, it all comes from the taxpayer. I believe, however, that people here were discussing this particular money’s last stop before the inauguration.
I didn’t vote for Obama, but McCain would have been worse and you better believe that if he’d won the party would have been at least as big, only the litlte people wouldn’t have been invited.
Ummm … and didn’t the DNC (and Obama, which (whom) does (and did) accept funding from you and I; perhaps you are the one who needs to to do more extensive research) fully support the whole “spreadywealth” premise? As such, I stand by my statement.
And where did I even MENTION taxpayer?
Obama didn’t accept public funding, IIRC. Is that what you mean?
Oh, for God’s sake, drop the “Obamessiah” crap. Just because the person you wanted in didn’t get in, doesn’t mean you have to be a child. “The Chosen One”, “The Messiah”, I’ve heard it all. And as for hype, every campaign has something. “Drill, Baby, Drill” ring a bell? Hell, “Joe the Plumber” (Or [name] the [occupation] ) was a physical manefestation of hype from the right. Seriously. Just let it go.
Suddenly he’s no longer our savior, and we’re no longer allowed to call him what he’s been hyped to be? You mean he’s not going to save us and change things? What, what?
Oh, the cognitive dissonance as deniable plausibility rears its ugly head. And all this retreatism before he’s even officially in office. Shocker, that.
How long before “Don’t blame me: I didn’t vote for him” becomes the mantra de jour?
I think what Kelto means is that if you take the Rush-speak down
a notch, and calm down a bit, you can get a lot further in conver-
sations here.
It’s your choice, but people who come onto PK blasting and
blazing don’t usually last very long. They get ignored, then bored,
then go away.
If you’ve been lurking for a while, you know I’m a left-winger,
and you know we outnumber the righties on PK at this time. In
fairness, I’m sure they would like to have a voice to add to their
side, and your grammar, syntax, etc., is a welcome change from
the norm.
I wish you would think about toning it down. It will help with your
traction, and you’ll get better results, imo.
rhorho,
You are truly an asset to this site. I am not ignoring you; please forgive me as I am preparing dinner and need to consider an appropriate response other than a heartfelt thank you for your sage advice. No sarcasm included. When I have a free moment, I hope you have the time for a back-and-forth exchange of advice.
I do want to let you know that I have neither listened to nor watched Rush (Limbaugh, I assume). I maintain a blowhard-free home for the sake of my children, who are compelled to interact in an increasingly diverse world.
Again, my thanks.
Welcome aboard, Dear!
you’re too easily charmed… it’s a retard.
She started off a little harsh, as most of us did.
She’s settling down already.
Besides, you’re eating out of froo’s hand these days,
and DWN isn’t here a lot on weekends. We have to
keep you off the streets, haven’t we?
It feels nice to be missed in some small way. : D
Erm, no, Frou has kept her more insane rhetoric down to a dull roar. If she comes up with something dumb, then I’ll tell her in Spades. Knoinwing my also in Clubs, The Bunn Family and several of the Major Arcana… same as I alway s have.
Yes, you’re tough. I just don’t want you to run out of toys.
Nice. I didn’t call anyone here names, yet I was called childish and retarded all the same just for offering my viewpoint. Thanks so much for your kind assessment of me as a person. I’m so grateful that I now not only have a firm definition of who I am (based, of course, on your open-minded opinions), but also a rationale for my dislike of those who espouse acceptance as an ideology, yet denigrate and ostracize anyone who disagrees with a simple posting on an LOL site. It’s the very definition of hypocrisy. Excellent example of liberal ideology. And your party has the audacity to accuse conservatives of being intolerant of the opinions and ideologies of others.
Again, thanks.
Just so you know, Fester’s a Brit, and claims no party as his own. He’s pretty much an equal-opportunity basher with a better-than-average vocabulary and a very sharp wit. I wouldn’t antagonize were I you.
Sardonic, this format is a little strange until you
get used to it. Uncle Fester wrote that comment
at 4:34 PK time, then posted under another post
of yours at 4:37. He was nice to you then.
I just wanted to make sure you’re aware of the
time line vs. page order.
um … hhnsardonic? The histrionics are too
similar. It can’t be a coincidence.
That’s three demerits for summoning.
I’ll try to make this simple.
You make ‘pig wind’ comments (loud, emphatic, pungent, and woitout worth to everyone except the pig) then expect no particular respect from me.
But chalk up another ‘Ya gahdamm librul’ post from an idiot for Fester.
Highly polished words that means ‘I’m a turd, get used to it…’
Quelle surprise.
Look, it’s neither funny nor has the breath of originality… so, find something new to insult the big eared twonk with… the right wing bull crap is just dull now.
Aw, but those big ears makes me think of my father’s family, so I kind of like them!
(opens can of turd polish..)
People on this site were saying that calling him the messiah is stupid since it started. It is almost entirely Republicans that were (and are) calling him that.
I wonder how many one-word political slanders there are.
We already have a good start:
Hopeychange
Yessycan
Spreadywealth
Obamessiah
To that, I would like to add my favorite:
Libtards
Anybody have any others?
Dittohead (depends on the inflection in your voice to turn it into a slanderous statement)
Librul
Conservitard
Socialist
-
These are from The Urban Dictionary:
Libterd (alt. Libturd)
Libnerd
Libsurd
Libdiot
Libored
Moonbat
I saw “Demoncrat” once. o.o
That’s catchy!
Don’t you mean one-y-word-y political slanders?
L-y-O-y-L !!
really?
most republicans are christians and referring to anyone as the ‘messiah’ besides Christ is usually considered heresy… so… nope, i dun believe you.
what republicans were saying was that the left was treating him ‘as a messiah…’ which in my opinion is quite an accurate characterization…
Republicans don’t own Christianity. I hope you weren’t going there…
“Obamessiah” is a favorite term of the right, not the left.
Sorry, but the “blasphemy” is on your side in this case.
rho, i think you misinterpreted what i said…
the republicans are saying that the dems are calling obama the messaih.
wow. that’s just a ridiculous statement to begin with… i feel like i should be in a trailer park somewhere… “my step-brother’s, cousin’s, best-friends, mother-in-law once slept with a dude that used to live with the brother of that guy who worked on the rolling stones tour…
can we please just say that if he’s anyone’s savior he wouldn’t be my first choice?
I said “Obamessiah” is a favorite term of the right,
but didn’t mean to imply that they used it in any way
except to trash talk about the left.
People on the left don’t use the term. That’s all I was
saying there.
And actually, Christianity doesn’t own the Republican party. I know of at least two orthodox Jewish people who vote red pretty consistently.
Hey I didn’t know you were friends with Joe Leiberman!
*Snort*
I wish I flew that high!
Isn’t Joe Leiberman a Methodist now?
He’ll always be Dr. Zoidberg to me.
There is a lot of sins that Christians commit despite knowing they are sins. Just stating.
Pride being a big one.
And Greed…
I’m a big fan of covetousness, personally. Also, sloth and gluttony. They’re three great sins that sin great together!
In bed… Lust throws the best parties.
once again the catholic church has been trumped by hollywood.
the seven deadly sins are a bunch of crap created by the church to dumb down the liturgical masses… God already gave us a list of ten, which you’d think would be easy enough to remember, but no… we had to drop three of them to make it work.
here are the ten commandments in the unabridged form…
.
3 Do not have any other gods before me.
.
4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
.
5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me,
.
6 but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.
.
7 You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name.
.
8 Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.
.
9 For six days you shall labour and do all your work.
.
10 But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the alien resident in your towns.
.
11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but rested the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and consecrated it.
.
12 Honor your father and your mother, so that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you.
.
13 You shall not kill
.
14 You shall not commit adultery.
.
15 You shall not steal.
.
16 You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour.
.
17 You shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour.
.
that 10th commandment is for you DWN…
You’re giving the Catholic version of the Ten Commandments, which doesn’t translate. Besides, apparently……well, we’ve had the ‘you can’t count’ discussion before
Wait… What am I coveting now?
i was waiting for someone to point that out, but it’s a trap! the numbers are actually the chapter numbers from exodus…
.
but i’m curious… what do you mean “doesn’t translate”?
The Baptist (prodestant?) version and the Catholic version differ in that MY 6th Commandment is ‘Do no kill’, and the Catholic 6th Commandment is (I think) ‘Do not steal’. There is some speculation as to why the part about ‘having no other gods before Me’ isn’t always in the Catholic version, and in order to make Ten they split up the last commandment into two parts. I won’t go into that here, but you can’t say ‘These are the Ten Commandments’ and expect everyone to use the same ones.
‘do no kill’? sry froo, couldn’t help myself…
.
and i do see your point about the ten commandments being different from different translations but i did not know that the order changes… that’s rather strange to me… i wonder if someone couldn’t count out there…
.
and your point about the ‘idol-worship’ does seem strange considering all the prayers to mary and the other saints… but still, the seven deadly sins are not in the bible anywhere… so…
They are too. You’ll have to let me get a Bible to look them up though.
And the order doesn’t change. As far as my side is concerned, they are missing one
It’s a translation thing. I blame Ewan McGreggor.
It’s like reindeer… Six in the poem; seven in
the song. Confusing!
“once again the catholic church has been trumped by hollywood.
the seven deadly sins are a bunch of crap created by the church to dumb down the liturgical masses…”
`
According to the linked article, the seven deadly sins were first written down somewhere around 590 AD by Pope Gregory, although that doesn’t really answer the question of who created them when (assuming it was any one person). Not sure where Hollywood enters into the picture, if at all.
“I blame Ewan McGreggor.”
`
Let’s sue him!
Can’t I go anywhere without fundies popping up to preach at me? *sigh*
I’m pretty sure the church established the 7 Deadlies to keep people from becoming worthless wastrel bastards. Simply telling them “hey! Don’t be worthless wastrel bastards!” wasn’t going to cut it, though, so being the church they put the threat of hellfire behind it. Think about it though. Anybody who indulges too much in any or all of the 7 is going to be too busy with those pursuits to put in a hard day’s work enriching the clergy. Either that or in the case of covetousness and wrath, giving the clergy what they so richly deserved.
The clergy of the day were too busy engaging in lust and greed to pay attention to the others.
Today’s clergy aren’t much different from their forefathers. I think the beginning of my disillusionment was disgust that so much of the church service consists of shameless begging for money. At first I thought it was just my church, but once your eyes are opened, you can’t help but see. They’re all in it for worldly gain, be it wealth, political clout, or simple dominion over their “flock.”
It depends too on the size of church you go to. The ‘mega-churchs’ are ruining it for teh smaller churches like mine.
TBH, size of the church is immaterial… Clergy are clergy… the smaller ones tend to just blame the victim and ostracise the family, whereas the mega-churches et al just pay people off…
Why am I picturing a Wal-Mart, with different
little churches where the McDonald’s, hair
salon, nail salon, photo studio, return desk,
etc., usually are?
Because that’s exactly what the ‘mega-churches’ are. They are commercialized houses of sin that exist to enrich the higher members and oppress the ‘lower’ members, and care not about educating the masses on their own ideology, but rather about how to wring every dollar they can out of the pockets of their richer members. It’s a status symbol to belong to them, and the uber-pastors know it. They capitalize on that, are keep those who truly want to know ‘the way’ from finding out what Christianity (or religion, et al) is all about.
-
It sickens me.
The purpose of religion is crowd control…
I thought that was the purpose of war…
The purpose of pestilence.
Yeah, religion just organizes the participants of the war into teams.
Hell n8, so does politics!
and the difference between religion and politics is?
Duh, elections are on Tuesdays, church is on Sundays! (Joke Disclaimer: Applies to U.S. residents and Christian churches only; some restrictions may apply…)
Ooh, ooh, I know this one!
What is a xylophone and a glockenspiel, Alex?
He never was our “Savior”. That is satire coming from the right. I, and everyone who voted for him, heard what he said and we’re holding him to it. If he doesn’t follow through, we’ll hold him responsible. Simple as that. And if something goes wrong, I won’t lie about who I voted for. Because I’m not a coward.
Your attitude and your sarcasm will get you no where.
“Suddenly he’s no longer our savior, and we’re no longer allowed to call him what he’s been hyped to be?”
`
He never was “our savior”. That particular meme is a reflection of the opposition’s sour grapes attitude.
`
” You mean he’s not going to save us and change things?”
`
I guess we’ll find that out when he, you know, like, actually takes office, huh?
`
“And all this retreatism
`
Which, I guess, implies that his supporters considered him the messiah and are now backpedaling from that? Debunked above.
`
before he’s even officially in office.”
`
That being the case, what do you make of all the *complaints* about him before he’s even officially in office? Sore losers who need to stfu and deal?
`
I think those were Uncle Fester’s “black grapes” Tessie.
Since I no longer visit the tropics, that’s less of a problem these days….
Though in his defense, his beach house is actually 11 mill cheaper then the one Jennifer anderson and Brad pit bought back before the split.
Holy crap, it’s a perfect caption!
If your an Obama fan, its just plays off your view of Clinton. And if your a Clinton fan, it plays off your image of Obama.
And if your not a fan of either, it’s a just plain hilarious!
See, every body wins!
In bed…
What if you like both?! =O
it’s still funny!
Perfect match for *both* facial expressions! WIN!!
This reeks of win
total win even without caption, just a picture of awesome!
*shakes cane at the above poopmeisters* Oh, h*ll kids, just enjoy the nice pic and shaddup, already.
This is without doubt one of the best captions ever to one of the greatest photographies of all time
It still amazes me how Hillary Clinton manages to be photographed with the most ridiculous faces. It makes me laugh
You make it sound like she’s pressing the shutter button. Contrast this with, say, how Princess Di was photographed during her lifetime. The latter woman was much more adored, but I’d be willing to lay money I don’t have that she made just as many goofy faces.
Ain’t asking anybody to love Mrs. Clinton, I have my own issues with her, but let’s be honest here, people don’t give her a chance. I wanted to believe women had a good shot at equal rights before she began her campaign. So much sexist ugliness was flung at her that I soon learned otherwise. All that crap had to come from somewhere and I doubt it was just two embarrassing Uncle Republicans in the back room, hidden away from the media.
Oh there were a LOT of goofy faced Diana pictures back inthe day. For the most part the ‘dead popstar’ factor has redacted them from history (but some of us remember…)
Yeah Princess Di has a lot more people to make sure her image is never sullied, ever.
Hilary Clinton is alive, has an animated face, and not as many people to keep up on keeping weird faces of the down low.
Alright…. I think you’re reading a lot into a statement I posted about the goofy faces of Hillary Clinton. I like her well enough, I don’t love her, but I don’t hate her. Pretty much anybody’s goofy faces will make me laugh.
Although I do agree with you about the sexism remarks, I think that people didn’t not like her simply because she was a woman, I think it was because of her standpoints on some issues. Obviously, there are definitely sexist people out there, but if she was a true politician, she wouldn’t let that bother her.
the only person that beat her out for weird faces is mccain… his took the cake…
Did you see the “Totally Looks Like” LOL with McCain and Bill the Cat?
no! i shall have to find that…
Voila!
Also, if you go to TLL and type “McCain” in the “find face” box,
there are some more funny ones. My favorite is the third one
that comes up on the search.
hahahahha… nice one rho!
I’m glad you liked it!
“You make it sound like she’s pressing the shutter button. Contrast this with, say, how Princess Di was photographed during her lifetime. The latter woman was much more adored, but I’d be willing to lay money I don’t have that she made just as many goofy faces.”
`
Nothing against Hillary, but it did seem that she had more than her fair share of crazy-face-making pictures during the campaign.
This is personal opinion at work here, but it seems like when she was in serious danger of losing the primary, up until she actually LOST the primary, the pictures got steadily worse and worse. Before that, she had decent pics that didn’t make her look like a she-bat more than 20 years older than her actual age.
I could have sworn I’d posted about this
Diana, back in the day had her fair selection of ‘goofball’ faces. It’s the Dead Popstar thing that has had them airbrushed from history.
Ah I did, above… I thought I was going slightly mad… just very slightly mad…
LOL!!
[LINK] under my name.
Freddie LIVES!!!
It finally happened!
Sexiest overbite EVAH!
True dat!
*big blush* Awwww shucks ya’ll, thanks. This made my Monday morning to see the overwhelming positive response.
you get no positive response from me! it should’ve been my caption on the front page!
Fair enough. I do like your wit so I will probably end up favoriting yours. *goes to check*
Oh, ubr, you make me so proud. Thank you for saying “should’ve”.
*swoons*
@charro… i didn’t know you felt that way about contractions… i shall have to remember that…
.
@DWN… you should see the new rockets/reporters one…
I feel that way about proper spelling and/or grammar. You said “should’ve” instead of “should of”, which if you recall from a previous thread drives me batty.
until i read your comment i had no idea that people could mistake should have for should of.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
*pant pant*
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*kaff kaff*
Oh man. I needed that. Thanks.
Yes, people do say “should of”, which boggles my mind. It doesn’t even make sense!!! I’ll try to find a link to that thread…
Fav’d the Rockets and the Palin’s mom one.
haha. thanks dwn!
.
and it’s been great, but i’m out of here… 10hrs in the office is too much for me…
Well when you get back, your encore awaits in the other thread.
so i completely forgot which thread that was in… haha…
Sgt Wilson one. Towards the bottom.
Hah! Nice one. Alas, my own reply to Miss Megaton has been eaten by the filter, hopefully it will resurface at some point. Really, you’d think that a synonym for a mule would be fair game on a political website… *sigh*
Okay, this made me LOL. The faces alone are hilarious, Obama’s “wtf r u doin?!” glare and Hillary’s “wut? I do nuttin!” face, are too funny, but the caption made it priceless. And mind you, usually I don’t like Hillary vs. Obama humour. This one was just too good not to laugh.
Barack Obama cares not for you existence. =_=