Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Technology News – US Airways installs Vista flight-software.


Obama pictures and McCain pictures

Technology News – US Airways installs Vista flight-software.

(U.S. Airways Flight 1549)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: MisterAJ

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 263 comments

  1. Seth says:

    Good job, Sully! Now there’s a man who knows where his towel is.

  2. ubr says:

    so… still not as good as the other captions, but at least this one made me lol just because it makes fun of vista…

    • Seth says:

      Yeah, coulda been better. But I’m with you, anything anti-vista is lolworthy, what with me being a Linux sysadmin and all. :) And the whole story just makes me smile. The pilot did an awesome job, everybody remained reasonably calm and helped each other, quick thinking and action got plenty of rescue vehicles there in plenty of time (even though the plane was drifting down-river and sinking) and most importantly, nobody died.

      I wouldn’t want to be the guy who’s wife texted him, “my plane is crashing” though. The pilot’s wife didn’t even know about it until he called her up, “Yeah, honey, I’ll be a little late today, I had to crash land in the Hudson, don’t worry, everything’s fine.” Props to the four police officers who commandeered a ferry, and got it to the plane where two of them tied themselves to the other two and went overboard into freezing water to rescue people. And to the helicopter dive crew that got the poor hypothermic woman out of the water. And, well, to everyone who remained calm while standing on the wings of an aircraft sinking in freezing water, there were babies on board who probably wouldn’t have survived a panic.

    • MisterAJ says:

      THX…
      No, not the greatest, I laughed harder at others…
      But i felt Vista needed a kick in the gonads, and this was an
      excellent opportunity… ;)

    • Dipsy dee says:

      this is one of the funniest to me (a mac user) because thats what’s would have happened.
      -
      to our heros

  3. Mr.Wholesome says:

    HAHA! That’s awesome.

  4. Pooper says:

    Eh, my caption (and a lot of others) where way funnier.

  5. Nick says:

    emergency landing, you did it rite!

  6. Uncle Fester says:

    Does anyone here know how rare a ditch on water with survivors actually is?

    And the Airbus is fly by wire. the fact the pilot still had *any* control is so remote as to be unheard of…

    • froofrou says:

      It’s so rare that I can’t think of any off the top of my head that have actually worked. Also, a little further up, Seth mentioned that he had looked up ditchings, and couldn’t find any with no casualties.
      -
      I heard something that said that conditions were perfect for them to crash, if that’s what they had to do. If they had been going cross-country and had a full load of fuel, they probably wouldn’t have floated for so long……had it not been a couple of minutes after take-off they would have been going too fast to ditch properly…….had the pilot and co-pilot not been total bad-asses the plane probably would have caught a wing-tip and flipped……

      • Uncle Fester says:

        Usually the plane just shatters on impact and sinks…

        and I was watching during the old airbus tests and the early adoption… I’d not have flown airbus until this century…

    • Dr Solar says:

      I thought with fly-by-wire you still had an ass-load of redundant routes to the control surfaces?

      Still, Sully’s lived up to the maxim of “any landing you walk away from is a good one”, nicely played!

      • ubr says:

        fester was not really referring to the routes to the control surfaces but rather the fact that the pilot has less of a feel for what the control surfaces are actually doing…

      • Uncle Fester says:

        No. By wire means it’s all in the computer’s ‘hands’…

        • OhMyGoodness says:

          Both are right… sorta. Yes, the Airbus A320 family is almost completely fly-by-wire; certainly all the major control surfaces are computer-activated. Yes, the pilot has “feel” for what the surfaces are doing, as the “stick” also behaves like a VERY good modern joystick with feedback.
          There ARE several redundancies built-in, in anticipation of a major catastrophe, and this is one of the very few cases where everything (after it ate some geese) went exactly right. The other incident specifically involving Airbus was an A300 belonging to DHL that landed after being shot by a missile (I think Kabul… see if I can reference it).
          Uncle Fester – when fly-by-wire is on top of its game, it’s no worse than the old ways of cable-to-actuator… just as many things to go wrong.

  7. B. Phil says:

    With the latest Service Pack, Windows Vista’s security is now literally water-tight!

  8. slan agat says:

    In other travel news, US Air also announced two new in-flight dinner options: goose and fish.

    • Dr Solar says:

      Goose is good eatin’! I’m making it a mission to eat my way through most of the animal kingdom, partly to experiece the difference, but mostly to annoy PETA.

      • Jimbo says:

        Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      • Uncle Fester says:

        minced goose is only any good if it’s boned before you mince it…

      • Steve says:

        This newsletter sounds very relevant to my interests. Where do I subscribe? I’ve gotten quite a few good critters on my plate so far! Alligator and Elk are two of the best so far. Whitetail Deer of course is a seasonal favorite here in Wisconsin. The little ones are the most delicious! Pheasants are average, nothing to write home about (chickens are bigger and better tasting) Goose…I don’t like. The meat is dry and reminds me of liver. Chocolate covered ants…well…you can take anything crunchy that doesn’t taste like anything and cover it with chocolate and it will taste good!

        PITA must hate me! (Mission: Going according to plan)

  9. Seth says:

    Gives a whole new meaning to the term ‘goose the engine.’

  10. Oranegreen says:

    I never had a problem with Vista other than I kept accidentally deleting my recycle bin :\
    To hear about a plane crashing in the FREEZING Hudson River (which is gross I might add) and everyone surviving was a total fluke
    Thank goodness all those water taxis are there, had the plane hit the water a few hours later (it gets very dark there) I can only guess how many would’ve died
    obviously, they were SO lucky
    Sucks for those geese though

    • Scum says:

      Sucks for those geese though

      If they were Honkers (Canadian Geese), they probably deserved it. Those suckers are mean and probably attacked the plane intentionally!

      • Oranegreen says:

        You’re a really cute troll!

        • Nah, scum’s not a troll. Just has a different perspective on geese than you do.

        • Scum says:

          Are you a member of the CGRA? (Canadian Goose Rights Association)?

          I grew up in MN where Canadian Geese are plentiful. Trust me, they’re mean suckers. They will chase you and bite you. They will gang up on kids, adults, old people. They think they own all of the lakes in the cities and they go to war to defend their territory. If they thought they owned that piece of the sky, I can see them attacking to defend it.

          (Only part of this is tongue in cheek – now you just have to figure out which cheek…)

          But thanks for the cute comment….

  11. Scum says:

    I’ve got a bone to pick. It’s not with this pic or this caption or anything said here so far, but at least one of the other captions to this or a similar pic of this accident, referred to the passengers as heroes.

    No, surviving an accident or any type of tragedy does not make you a hero. Using the word in that sense diminishes it’s true meaning and for those to whom it does apply, reduces its value.

    Was the pilot a hero? For landing the plane in the manner he did and for allowing everyone to survive, was he heroic? No. He was incredibly skilled and apparently kept his wits about him and, with some additional shear luck, accomplished an amazing task. He wasn’t putting his life at risk in order to save others. His life was also at risk.

    Now, was he a hero for staying in the plane and making doubly sure that everyone got off safely? I’d say that’s closer to being heroic. It was certainly brave. I’m not trying to diminish anything, anyone did, but hero is has become one of those words that is applied incorrectly so often, it’s losing its true value.

    For example, not all of the soldiers fighting over seas are heroes. Some of them are, without a doubt, but most of them are just average people doing an incredibly difficult job that most people wouldn’t want to go near.

    The word Hero should mean something.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      From personal experience…. surviving an accident of the crash type isn’t ‘hero’ status…it’s being to stubborn to die then… and leave the wounded and run.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      and as an addendum… fighting over seas does NOT imbue ‘hero’ status. If that’s true then being sponsored by Nike makes you a hero.

    • Seth says:

      The passengers did not panic. That lack of panic saved lives. Maybe hero is too strong a word, but they sure acted better than the average disaster victims.

      • Scum says:

        That’s a valid point. I do agree that hero is too strong a word to describe the lack of panic. If they didn’t panic, then rushed into a sinking plane, risking their own lives to save others, then we can talk about using the word.

        Certainly there could be a hero or 5 amongst them, but the simple act of surviving an accident does not a hero make.

        I was also just using this as a soapbox from which to comment about the practice in the US of calling all soldiers heroes. It’s simply not true.

      • OhMyGoodness says:

        I’ll back Seth on that – very unusual, and in an environment most likely to cause panic. Even in a completely controlled environment (massive swimming pool with rafts), the stews being trained in emergency procedures panicked regularly. Some of those were veterans. This is a remarkable bunch of people. I’m not buying into the hero-or-not thing, but these pax ALL deserve a good pat on the back.

        • Seth says:

          I’m guessing it was a combination of factors. The simple shock of being alive and mostly unhurt probably raised everyone’s spirits. Then there was the pilot and crew’s calm demeanor, and putting the passengers first probably made everyone feel they had something to live up to. Finally, they got outside and they were in the middle of New York city surrounded by boats with all eyes on them. Nobody wants to look like a panicky fool in front of the whole nation.

      • Uncle Fester says:

        I think it’s more familiarity with the concept. People generally panic in a laien situation… Planes, and the crashing thereof, is becoming zeitgeist.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          ALIEN and ARE… I think the phrase ‘too late at night sums things up at this end…

          • OMG says:

            i think this is what you’re trying to say: people see so many false things ( i cite mythbusters special on Hollywood stunts ) that they forget the forces in play are much more, and you will die or get Very hurt. Could this be an explanation to their relative calm of the situation? could you of used the word “zeitgeist” in an incorrect tense?
            -
            these things we shall never know.
            -
            Zeitgeist [tsyt‐gyst], the German word for ‘time‐spirit’, more often translated as ‘spirit of the age’. It usually refers to the prevailing mood or attitude of a given period.
            -
            Get some sleep :D

            • rhorho says:

              This is obviously not the OMG we know.

              i think this is what you’re trying to say

              Second word fail.

              could you of used the word “zeitgeist” in an incorrect tense?

              Nouns don’t have “tenses,” and he used the noun correctly.

              Get some brain. :roll:

              • Uncle Fester says:

                you missed the word is ‘HAVE’ not ‘OF’ also… but please, continue ripping the retarded id-jacker more holes…

                • rhorho says:

                  Oops! I misovercorrected. Thanks for catching that slip:
                  You are a true zeitgeist of a guy. :-)

                  I would *have* corrected his correction of you more
                  harshly, but the poor thing might “die or get Very hurt.”
                  Not my usual stance in view of such idiocy, but evidently
                  “the forces in play are much more.”

            • Uncle Fester says:

              Zeitgeist also has the shade of meaning that implies ‘Collective Consciousness’, thus “Anti-Semitism was a major part of the Western Zeitgeist in the 1930s…” is a correct and accepted usage.

              And you are a moron…

    • thissenthat says:

      So how exactly do you define a hero?

      • Seth says:

        It’s like a hoagie or a grinder.

      • Uncle Fester says:

        the guy who wrestled an airbus into a ditch… that’s a hero.

      • Jack Squat says:

        Someone who gets other people killed

      • Scum says:

        The simplest definition I can come up with would be that it’s choosing to put your life or even simply your safety at risk in order to help someone else.

        If you don’t make the choice, or if you are not putting yourself at risk, then no, I don’t think it qualifies for hero status. For instance, the pilot was saving his ass as much as everyone else’s. From what I’ve heard about Sully, probably was more concerned for everyone else, but still, he didn’t choose to put himself in danger while saving everyone.

        When he stayed in the plane to make sure everyone got off ok, then maybe. I can’t know if he felt he was in imminent danger. I can’t know if the plane was sinking and he thought he could go down with it, so I don’t know.

        Firemen. In spite of all of the safety equipment and procedures they have, and even though it is their job, I still think they qualify for many if not most of the dangerous situations they enter.

        Policemen, pretty much the same thing.

        Does that help? If you disagree, how would you define the word?

        • Seth T says:

          Then couldn’t you say that soldiers who volunteer to put their lives in danger by going into a war zone to protect lives qualify as hero’s?

          • Scum says:

            No, at least in my mind it can’t be applied that easily or broadly or it loses its true meaning.

            The word eclectic has come to mean a mish-mash of items taken from a large variety of [insert appropriate superset here].

            Example, a living room with one or two pieces of furniture each from many different, incompatible styles. The whole is called eclectic.

            What the word originally meant was more like ‘one thing out of many’, meaning that from a large field of choices, you chose that one, truly remarkable or special item.

            I see hero in the same way. Of the soldiers you mention, many of them will never see combat. Many of them will never be put in a position where they distinguish themselves from the backgound noise of all of the other soldiers who signed on to do the same job. I’m not saying they’re not brave. I’m not saying that they don’t have hero potential. They may, but are never put in a position where they need to distinguish themselves in such a way.

            Hero is an eclectic term; rare and special.

            I think you’ve pointed out my mistake. I think I was too generous with applying it too easily to firemen and policemen. I think many of them are heroes, or potential heroes. See, it’s an easy trap to fall into.

        • Scum says:

          I was going to use the ‘I know it when I see it’ reference from Potter Stewart too.

          [Link]

    • Paul says:

      “The word Hero should mean something.”

      Amen, and thank you. Very well said.

  12. Graham says:

    For what it’s worth. Ubuntu has crashed on me way more than Vista. Vista has actually never crashed for me.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Hmmm…. not someone who uses podcasts or MTP players…

      • rhorho says:

        He may be talking about post Service Pack 1.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          No… it’s still crap with MTP post SP1…

          And SP1 was a joke.

          I’d not altered the base config of my laptop since I got if from the manufacturer, but I had to poke around it’s innards in CMD to get the bloody thing to install SP1.

          I had to turn off a service that, MS state you cannot turn off on my model
          laptop., to get SP1 to load. Then SP1 removes the ‘essential service’…

          I expect to have to know my way around the *nix command line, but M$ sells itself on being ‘load and go’…my entire, alabaster like, English arse it’s load and go…

          • rhorho says:

            I cheated the Matrix, and bought a laptop with SP1 preloaded. I
            haven’t had any trouble with MTP, PTP or podcasts, but perhaps my
            days are numbered. (My only religion fail is a staunch belief in the
            phenomenon of “jinx.”)

  13. Schmoe says:

    Thank you. You’ve just made a happy man feel very old. I have no idea what the joke is here. And I don’t CARE!

  14. SilentJ says:

    While we’re ranting, why is “flight-software” hyphenated? Or is bad grammar and spelling just part of the LOL meme?

    LOL: Still good, though I think it could have been better with something like:

    “NYC: Planes go in, but they don’t come out!” (latent 9/11 reference for extra spiciness)

    “I said, ‘I’d rather drive.’ And then YOU said, ‘Flying is safer.’ Jerk.”

    “Geese: Serious Business”

    “Look, when I said we should crash this party, I meant…”

    And yeah. Not seeng heroics here. Fast thinking and cool heads all around? Definitely. Worth a hearty handshake and a free meal or two? Sure. But heros? Medals? This kind of thing happens every day. It’s just usually not this spectacular or caught on the news.

  15. Seth says:

    If liberals really thought Obama was some kind of a Messiah, we’d all be screaming that this is a Sign. But maybe we should be. Oh, not about Obama, hear me out. Our economics problems really boil down to a lack of faith. And here we have something that looked as if it could have been a horrible disaster, yet turned out to be something where no one was seriously hurt and everyone got to rally ’round and feel good for having overcome the problem. A miracle, if you will. Now I’m not suggesting magical thinking, as if this really was some kind of sign. But people are superstitious, illogical creatures, for the most part. Present company excepted, of course. Just putting it out there…

  16. Jack Squat says:

    Vista makes birds try to attack the hardware that’s running it?

    Never had that problem with my laptop, must be the newest update.

  17. Scum says:

    Ya, miracle is another one of those words which gets used far too often.

    I prayed they’d have the chocolate donuts with the almond sprinkles and they DID!! It’s a miracle!!”

    Ok, I exaggerate. Slightly.

    PK loser, oh, I mean PK user, NOBama08 has already created two captioned pics where the theme, like so many of his others, is him pretending to be a liberal, blaming the event on Bush. [Link]

    I think I understand your point in this, but it’s not faith that kept those people alive. It was a whole bunch of skilled people, from the designers, manufacturers, and pilot and other crew members. It was luck that they hit the geese where and when they did as the flaps were still extended for takeoff and gave them a better glider ratio. There were countless other things/people involved, but no, I don’t think anyone is going to start claiming this as a holy sign of the divinity of Obama.

    Hell, everything that goes right during his terms is going to be used by some to prove that he is indeed the anti-christ.

    If you don’t already know the site, you must check out FSTDT. com
    (Fundies Say The Darndest Things).

    • Seth says:

      I’m assuming this was a reply to me, so, spelling it out: If we pretend like this is a sign the economy will get better it might get better. Not even pretend, just speculate in front of the simple minded and gossipy. It becomes a meme and spreads, and people start believing the economy will get better and start spending again, making the economy get better. Or maybe that’s just my altered state of mind on a Friday night talking…

      • froofrou says:

        Why haven’t we been doing that the last 6 months, then? Why, when gas prices were going up to $4 and more a gallon, we were showing the highest possible prices in the city instead of the lowest? We were conditioning people to think that paying $3.98 per gallon was ok, because some poor sap down the way had to pay $4.
        -
        Want me to really piss you off? Rush Limbaugh said nearly the same thing you just said this week on the radio (I read his site to get caught up, hehe)
        -
        We need to be positive. We need to hope for and expect the best. And we need to expect our leaders, newpapers, tv news, and everyone else to help us get to that best.

        • Seth says:

          Why not for the last six months? Because there were some very serious shocks to the system, and merely hoping for the best at that point would have been silly. Now we are dealing with domino effects, really more of a positive feedback cycle (positive meaning amplifying the effect, not damping it down.) So belief becomes a larger factor than it was, as it is one of the amplifiers. Panic and fear breed selfishness and hoarding. Good points though. My respect and fondness for you continue to grow. :)

          • froofrou says:

            See, this goes to bolster my point that you’re so far to the left that you’re almost on the right again ;-)

            • rhorho says:

              Oooh. I’m going to have to go with fact fail on that one. Can you
              imagine Seth crossing through the troll zone to the right of you?

        • Scum says:

          Positive thoughts have to be encouraged. You have to feed them or like any living organism, they die. In the environment of the last 8 years or so, there was little to no food left for positive thoughts. With any new administration people have hope again. Bush killed that hope early on and for eight years, dug the grave deeper and deeper.

          Rush isn’t stupid, he’s just selfish and evil. Pretty much everything he does is for his own benefit. That’s the selfish part. He doesn’t seem to care if he lies, steels, cheats, or who or what gets damaged as a result. That would be the evil part. He’s not an idiot, no matter how many times I call him one.

          • scum says:

            *steals*

          • Seth says:

            Hehe, I was going to say the exact same thing about Rush. Selfish, evil, but not an idiot. Goes for Bush, too, despite how I love to make fun of his verbal gaffs. He’s not an idiot, per se, but his post-alcoholic syndrome and other drug use couldn’t have been good for whatever natural intellect he was born with.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          You still trust that lying junkie?

          • froofrou says:

            If you’ll notice, I didn’t make a judgement call about the words said, I was simply illustrating what was said to make a point. My trusting or not trusting of Rush Limbaugh has nothing to do with the conversation at hand.

            • Uncle Fester says:

              True… I was just asking…

              • Uncle Fester says:

                One of the great things about no being liberal…
                I can be REALLY intolerant of his hypocrisy about drugs, and no one can touch me :)

              • froofrou says:

                I enjoy listening to him when I can, but since I work second shift, I am rarely around the radio when he’s on. I’m not paying the membership fees to listen to him online (it’s not that important to me), so I read his website to get caught up on the latest right wing doings. I read Huffington for the same reason.
                -
                I was just doing my best to irritate Seth by pointing out that he almost quoted word for word what Senor Limbaugh was saying last week :-)

      • Scum says:

        Yes Seth, that was a response to your post. I’m failing when it comes to responding to posts near the bottom of the page.

        I see what you’re saying. Basically it’s the old ‘think positively and positive things will happen.’ It actually does work, if only because we make them happen by thinking they will. I think (positively) that this is where you were going.

        • Danbala says:

          Yes, it can work when it comes to something like economy, which is just a lot of psychology anyway. :)
          .
          (The current financial crisis is a much bigger problem to some individuals than it should have to be, because media is painting it in darker colours than it needs to be. I can’t give you a sensible source for this statement, I was listening to interviews on one of the more in-depth programs on my lovely talk radio. A lot of people were getting panicky for no ohter reason than having read in the papers that they probably should. Yay.)

          • froofrou says:

            It’s the same concept behind showing the highest possible gas prices on the news and slowly getting the masses to accept said higher prices, because at least they’re not paying what the poor sap down the road is paying. Things are almost never as bad as the media portrays them to be, because the worse the news, the more revenue is had by the media outlets.

            • Danbala says:

              Yep.
              “OMFG WE GONNA DIE!!!!”
              sells a lot more than
              “Things aren’t good, but not as horrible as they could be.”
              .
              Then again, combined with “w00t! NUDITY SHOCK SENSATION*” anything seems to sell though. I can’t decide what I loathe most: media or the people who buy it. As in “buy it”, not just hand money over.
              .
              *) One such nudity shocker thing I once noticed turned out to be something about an actor having appeared on stage in underwear. Very w00t.

          • Scum says:

            Even I started to get nervous when I heard that BofA had asked for another 20 Billion. I didn’t realize they changed their mind and took money the first time. I instantly thought, should I take my money out and put it under the mattress or something. Then I flashed on the scenes from movies of the great depression and the runs on the banks, which resulted in the banks failing. I all of a sudden understood exactly how it happened the first time.

            Obviously, I didn’t put any money under my mattress, so if anyone knows where I live, you’re not going to find it there. I know FDIC should protect my money…

            • froofrou says:

              FDIC will protect your money as long as the government has the money to pay back. Unless I’m misunderstanding the point of a government insurance program? I wouldn’t trust it right now as far as I could throw my brother uphill against the wind, and he’s a really big guy.

              • Scum says:

                I’m in complete agreement, but I’m also trying to not be one of those
                foolishly panicking people Danbala mentioned .

                I also flashed on the Savings and Loan scandal where people did lose their life savings, with no recourse. I know it was a different situation where FDIC didn’t apply, but if the government didn’t have the money, at best I’d get a portion of my money back, at worst nothing.

                Nothing good can come out of panicking.

                • Danbala says:

                  A very scary bit about how people seem to function (in my perception) is that if media says “if people panic, things will go down the drain” a lot of people will think along the lines of: “Well, I am not one to panic, but other people are morons and probably will panic, so I’d better hurry up and get my money out of the bank before the panicky people get there”. Something like that.

                  • Scum says:

                    And that’s pretty much what ran through my head.

                    The, the money’s not here.

                    Well, your money’s in Joe’s house…
                    that’s right next to yours.

                    And in the Kennedy House, and Mrs. Macklin’s
                    house, and, and a hundred others.

                    Why, you’re lending them the money to build, and then, they’re going to pay it
                    back to you as best they can.

                    Now what are you going to do?
                    Foreclose on them?

                    • Danbala says:

                      I’m something of an American culture illiterate, but thanks to Google found out where that’s from. Maybe I should watch that movie some time, after all. :)

                      • froofrou says:

                        It took me a second to figure out what it was from, but yes, you totally need to watch that movie :-)

                      • Scum says:

                        It’s a classic. Even though you’ve not yet seen it, you will recognize a lot of it because it’s been mimicked in books, movies and tv shows for
                        60 years.

                        I personally can’t stand it anymore because it’s been played to death every christmas. But it is a must see, at least once.

                • froofrou says:

                  But that’s exactly what we’ve had for the last several months. I may be wrong here, but I’m of the opinion that the recession we’re in now (job losses, revenues down, people hoarding their money) is a lot worse than it should be, simply because it’s been played up. Employers see other employers dropping jobs because of a slower economy, they think they need to cut their losses before they get that bad, drop jobs themselves, and BOOM, you’ve got yourself a full-blown recession.
                  -
                  I’m all for people knowing what’s going on in the world, but the spin that is put on it is unnecessary. And, some things are best left reported on after the fact, IMO.

                  • Scum says:

                    I agree with your assessment of what’s been happening, and that it includes a certain amount of panic already happening. I’m not sure I can agree that it’s better to keep people in the dark over such matters.

                    Obviously there are national security issues which can’t be shared, and you’re right that there are many people just looking to panic over anything. I think maybe what you were getting at is that if we had non-sensationalistic reporting, things would not be as bad as they are today. With that, I would have to agree.

                    I also think that many people just aren’t smart enough to understand the nuances of a world economy, I’m not. I think people like to think they are, and like to think they know what they’re doing and demand that things be done their way or else. Under these circumstances, I have to be able to step back and trust those who really do know what they’re talking about, and who aren’t just in it for themselves (that discounts most politicians unfortunately).

                    • froofrou says:

                      I’m sorry I wasn’t clear in my post. I don’t want to keep people in the dark, but there is no need in causing a panic at the slightest little dip in the stock market. People are convinced that the entire country is affected by the ‘recession’ we’re in. It’s not. I’ve mentioned before that we have jobs in Texas. We’re constantly hiring here, and around here. We have oil jobs out there for the taking. Even with oil and gas prices what they are. And these jobs aren’t all laborer jobs or line worker jobs. They’re good, somewhat high-paying jobs in everything from line working to upper management. Other states have jobs, and aren’t in the recession that some states (such as Michigan) are in. Detroit is losing jobs. Ok. That’s not the entire country. Life moves on. We were told that the world was going to end unless Congress voted in TARP and the bailout money. It was voted in, wasn’t used right away, and the world didn’t end. The companies and houses it was supposed to save didn’t get any help from it, and the world is still spinning, people are still going to work, going to the grocery store, still driving their cars around……
                      -
                      The nuances of a world economy isn’t going to affect the Joneses down the street. Normal people don’t suffer when the stock market dips. This false sense of panic is silly, it’s harmful, and it’s unnecessary. As far as having non-sensationalist reporting, we’ll never get that. It’s what sells papers, internet ads, and radio advertisements. I just wish we could stick to the type of reporting that sensationalizes Britney Spears getting her kids back as opposed to jobs being lost in a couple of states and being made to appear as though the entire country is in the same boat.

                      • Scum says:

                        As long as I’m not forced to read the Hollywood sensationalist crap, fine, have at it. I think it’s my fault for not understanding what you wrote.

                        A lot of people across the country are being directly affected though. maybe, being where you are, you’re not seeing it quite as strongly as some others are. Yes, you can certainly chalk some of that up to panic. Some of it is planning. Some of it is reality. A lot of people have lost their jobs. A lot of companies have failed. A lot more have had layoffs. I know quite a few people who are out of work now due to layoffs. In one of the industries in which I’ve worked, the companies rely on massive amounts of funding for between 10 – 20 years before the investors will see actual products put on the market. Much of that funding has dried up and these business are laying off so they can continue to run on what they currently have, in order to not fold in 6 months.

                        They’re being careful because it’s not a stable economy. This isn’t panic, it’s safeguarding. But to the people who are getting laid off, and finding that the other companies in the same industry aren’t hiring either, that’s panic.

                        Don’t even get me started on the lack of regulation the republicans insisted not be in the ‘banking bailout’, or the wimpy ass democrats who once again didn’t stand up for what they knew, or should have known needed to be done. They’re so damned afraid of looking like wimps, so they act like wimps. Our government sucks. But I digress…

                        I don’t think Obama is a financial genius, and I don’t think he thinks he is either. I do think he will surround himself with the best advisers available, and I do think he’ll listen to them. At this point there’s little to do but watch and wait.

                        • rhorho says:

                          I like the even-handedness of your assess-
                          ment. Nobody was watching the kids, and
                          everybody’s now *shocked* to find an empty
                          cookie jar…

                        • Scum says:

                          Yeah and I really want a cookie, dammit.

                        • rhorho says:

                          *gives Scum a damm cookie*

                          That was my next-to-last one, too, dammit!

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          I do think he will surround himself with the best advisers available, and I do think he’ll listen to them. At this point there’s little to do but watch and wait.

                          Problem is, the ‘cream of the crop’ are pretty crappy… these are people who still sing the same hymn sheet as the last lot

                        • rhorho says:

                          @Unc: I think a little less theocracy up top
                          will help, and Obama doesn’t have those big
                          ears for nothing, yes?

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Unless there’s a cull of economists, it’s not going to be earth shattering, just a band aid to let things limp on for another few years…

                        • rhorho says:

                          I hope you’re at least a little off on your
                          assessment, though you’re likely right.

                          In the physical world, cleaning a mess takes
                          longer than making one, and it’s likely true
                          in economics, as well.

                        • Danbala says:

                          h0h0…
                          How many decades has this particular mess taken to make? :/

                        • froofrou says:

                          Truth be told, this particular mess can be traced back to Nixon, and beyond. It’s more complicated than blaming this party or that party. It took a long time for this house of cards to be built.

                      • Danbala says:

                        People are convinced that the entire country is affected by the ‘recession’ we’re in. It’s not.
                        Oh, I think the whole world is affected, and I don’t think the word recession needs quotation marks. However, I don’t think the entire world is devastated or that everything, everywhere must come to a grinding halt. It’d be as silly to ignore that we have a global financial crisis as it is to make people believe they’ll all be homeless before the year is over because of it. That’s how I perceive the situation from my corner of said world, at least. :)

                        • froofrou says:

                          I certainly don’t want to ignore the actualities, I just don’t feel it’s necessary to try and portray them as worse than they are. :-)

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Quite why banks screwing eahc other became an issue that the banks needed baling is beyond me… surely it would have been simpler to underwirte peope’s savings and let the banks duke it out (actually I know this answers, since asI’ve said elesewhere, laissez faire economics favours the stable points of monopolies or cartels… The great myth of the ‘free market’ is that it’s a negatives feed back system, when actually it’s a positive one… which is why I class economics as a relion rather than a science, since the observable behaviour is 100% at odds with what we’re told, and economists pretend, it does…)

                        • Danbala says:

                          “which is why I class economics as a relion rather than a science”
                          My agreeingz – let me show u it.
                          .
                          People all over the world tend to refer to the Nobel prize in economics, unless they actually want to spare poor ole Alfred all that grave-spinning (it’s hell for the back, I hear). It’s not a Nobel prize. (I am sure you know that already, but I try never to miss an opportunity to point it out, just generally.) Its name “Sveriges riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne” does contain the phrase “economic sciences” though, but that’s just make-belief. ;P

                  • rhorho says:

                    Froo, you made a good point about what I call the “bank
                    run” mentality, but, if there is a recession coming, don’t
                    you think it’s better, in the long run, to warn people?

                    Understand, I’m talking about the long run. Someone
                    about to enter the housing market at the edge of a
                    recession may buy a house just before being laid off.
                    That’s not better, in the long run, than having that
                    same person staying put, waiting for tides to turn,
                    with a roof overhead in the meantime?

                    • Scum says:

                      Yes and no. It’s all a crap shoot. If you warn all of those people about the impending doom of a recession or depression, you’re helping to make it happen by inciting panic behavior.

                      If you don’t warn them and it never happens, cool. If you don’t warn them and it does happen, maybe it won’t be as bad as it could have been? Eh, it’s a crap shoot, and I’m no expert.

                      • rhorho says:

                        You’re right. I didn’t include a line about my
                        general disdain for the “Chicken Little” style
                        journalism we see in these days of 24-7 news.

                        Sticking with my nursery story theme, I’m afraid
                        we will soon experience panic fatigue, and
                        develop a “Boy Who Cried Wolf” reaction to
                        news about which we actually *should* panic.

                        Climate change and foreign oil dependency
                        make my list…

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        Scum,
                        it was a crap shoot brought down by the side bets…

                    • froofrou says:

                      Warn, don’t sensationalize. Inform, don’t cause. Show the downfalls while still showing the possibilities. If you put a positive spin on it, or at least DON’T put a negative one on it, then hope won’t be lost and there will be something to strive for. Or, in the case of those who are at the edge of said recession, something to plan for and hope for the end of. When you show people jumping off a cliff and portray it as being normal, you can’t be shocked when people start jumping off themselves because they think it’s the only way. (sorry, that’s a blanket, but I’m trying to illustrate a point)

                      • rhorho says:

                        Good illustration. I did neglect to throw in a
                        comment or two about how the news should
                        *report,* and not *create* the news.

                        In my earliest cognizant days, airplane hijacking
                        was all the rage. People were up in arms then,
                        saying that reporting hijacking was furthering
                        the causes of the hijackers, who did so for
                        attention. It was the same argument then: We
                        can’t be kept in the dark, but it’s wrong to
                        encourage criminals, and give others ideas.
                        I see those as similar arguments, at any rate.

                        • Danbala says:

                          Media here has some sort of general agreement to not report very much about suicides, because back when they did, statistics apparently have shown that after media attention to one suicide, the rates go up. People on the verge get that extra push. :/
                          (This is not directly related to the issue we’re discussing, I just throw it in as a side comment.)

                        • rhorho says:

                          @Danbala: The suicide statistics are totally
                          in line with the rest. How do reporters do a
                          good job (reporting) while not creating news
                          in the process?

                        • Scum says:

                          @ Danbala & rhorho
                          Example:
                          I lived in SF for many years. The Golden Gate Bridge is notorious for jumpers. There was one very popular DJ (Alex Bennett on Live 105) who decided one day that they were going to give the family of the 1000th GG bridge jumper prizes like radio station t-shirts, mugs, maybe some cash, I can’t remember. This was about 15 years ago. (I also don’t remember if it was the 1,000th jumper or what the count really was at that time). The City and Country of SF reported jumpers as part of the regular public stats.

                          This stunt on his show became very popular. Every time someone jumped, the DJ reported it and seemed to encourage more people to get the number up to the magic 1,000 or whatever. It appeared to work. There appeared to be an increase in the number of suicides from the bridge. This went on for at least a few weeks, but if I remember right, it was more like a few months. Then the City and County of SF pulled the plug on reporting those particular stats. He wasn’t doing anything illegal so they couldn’t stop him. Instead they just kept the information non-public.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Is there any way to know whether the num-
                          bers decreased as a result?

                        • Scum says:

                          @rhorho
                          I think they still reported the stats annually, so I’m sure there was a way to know the effect of both.
                          I didn’t pay that much attention back then, so I’m not sure of the results.

                    • Danbala says:

                      Yes. My interpretation of the discussion here is that it is more about the “There’s a recession, the economy will be slow and groth rates smaller than we’ve grown used to lately”-reporting compared to “We crash! We burn! Run for the woods everyone!”-reporting.

                      • Danbala says:

                        GROTH!
                        Growth, maybe.

                      • Danbala says:

                        Y2K comes to mind. :)

                        • Scum says:

                          By referencing Y2K, I’m thinking that you mean that there was wide panic over Y2K and that it was all for naught, because almost no problems came of it? Would I be right?

                          I could not begin to tell you how many hundreds of hours I personally put in to make sure that none of my
                          companies / clients would have problems. There were untold thousands of programmers, accountants, managers, auditors etc working to ensure that everything was accounted for and we wouldn’t implode.

                          Now after writing the above, it dawned on me that that might be exactly what you meant by your Y2K comment, that you were agreeing with FooFrou above about informing, but not panicking. If so, I’ll have to agree ;-)

                        • Danbala says:

                          Yes, that’s what I mean. The problems with code not supporting a new millennium were real, the risks as portrayed in the reporting absolutely ridiculous (especially considering that people were doing what you were).

                          (I’m a programmer by profession today, but fortunately I was still in uni while you other poor suckers were grinding through those endless lines of code. :) )

                        • Danbala says:

                          … and that Simpsons treehouse episode comes to mind now! (Life’s a glitch, then you die)

                        • Scum says:

                          @Danbala

                          In that case, good analogy and let’s hope it plays out as well.

                        • rhorho says:

                          I can see the trouble in the news industry. If
                          you don’t tease well, your viewers will go to
                          another network, and you’ll lose sponsors.

                          Show of hands: How many people watch as
                          much C-Span as they do anything else?

                          Yep. Me, too.

                        • Danbala says:

                          I can see the trouble in the news industry.
                          Yes, and the problem to civilisation is that too many people have never learned critical viewing/listening/reading. “I read it in the newspapers, so it must be true!”

                        • Danbala says:

                          @rho:
                          We don’t really get cspan here. I tried to watch when I lived in the states, but … meh. ;P
                          What we do have here is license-funded public service. It stays a bit more sane than commercial media, I think, but of course, they too have to attract the attention of their potential audience, so it’s also very far from perfect in reporting. (And can’t afford to research everything on their own, ofc)

                        • Danbala says:

                          “public service media“, I was going to say.
                          Hm. Lots of writing errors for me lately… Hang on, I know:
                          I currently write this badly to illustrate another problem I have with media here – they all seem to have fired their proof-readers. That’s why!

                        • rhorho says:

                          Education, if not savvy, is what’s required.
                          A good knowledge of history could easily
                          buffer some of the panic. Remember the
                          LOL depicting people going through the Big
                          Depression? People need only see some of
                          those images to compare how much better
                          we will fare, even if all of the doomsayers
                          turn out to be correct.

  18. Larcurmo says:

    You know, with all the phone cameras and other video recording going on in today’s world, I’m surprised that no one in a city of 8.2 mil managed to get a vid of it actually hitting the water.

  19. Pom Rania says:

    LOL; I sent this to my computers prof, who’s rather… shall we say outspoken about his support for open-source software, and his dislike (mildly put) for Microsoft.

  20. Willow says:

    This speaks the truth….vista fails…when im writing this message i might get an error and my comp will crash…you never kno—ERROR

  21. Riko says:

    Yeah, I like linux, but I am getting sick of the Vista bashing for the sake of Vista bashing. Just a bunch of lemmings making linux users look like ingnorant jerks, IMHO.

  22. Michael says:

    I’ve never had any problems with Vista crashing. The security prompts can be tedious _but that isn’t a flaw_! It is working as intended and advertised.

    But hey Graphic Artists and English Lit Grad Students, continue to be impressed with Macs. They only cost more, do less, and the hardware and software are made by the same company. Getting an I-Phone? Hope you like ATT wireless and not having the option to buy risque apps.

    • Scum says:

      Bill? Is that you?

      First, just because it is ‘working as intended’ does not mean that it isn’t a flaw. In the language of this site, that OS is a FAIL. It’s crap on a platter.

      The security prompts are simply an overly intrusive (to the consumer) way for MS to Cover its own ass. They put that ‘feature’ in there so they can’t be held liable for when anything and everything breaks through the massive security holes in their product.

      ‘risque apps.’? Did you mean RISC apps or did you really mean Risqué?

    • Danbala says:

      Oh, dear. One does not have to be a mac-maniac to find windows a general pita. What kind of religion is it that requires this worship of an OS?

  23. Chris says:

    I posted this pic on a flight sim forum and was soundly criticized for it. I’m glad that there are still some people in the world with a sense of humor.

  24. superfly_nz says:

    So one could actually read from this, that because Vista was installed, it was able to be successfully put down into a river, in one peice, even after catostrphic engine failure, without any loss of life.

    Go Vista!

    • Scum says:

      If one worked for Microslop, then yes, one could read it that way.
      We who have had Vista thrust upon us however, have a more realistic view.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up