Eight years and no one even offered to blow me.
(George W. Bush)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: MacAhi
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous The Million Mime March was ignored | FREEBIRD! Next »
Eight years and no one
» 397 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Geary on Talking Horse Pleads the … crazyalwayswins on Talking Horse Pleads the … Geary on Gay Rights: Coming to a Theate… itsybit on Talking Horse Pleads the … phades on Gay Rights: Coming to a Theate… itsybit on Talking Horse Pleads the … Geary on Gay Rights: Coming to a Theate… Geary on Gay Rights: Coming to a Theate… Pratrp on Talking Horse Pleads the … Geary on Gay Rights: Coming to a Theate… 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Animal Gifs: Ohai... Don't Mind Me... Agin...
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
Kappa Alpha Tau
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Snow White and The Seven Pugs
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
You Open Yet? How About Now?
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
THE BREAD. ITS TOO MUCH.
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Reader Squee: Emo the Flyer!
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
Yorick's Brains are Delicious
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
The Hills are Alive With the Smell of Curing
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
The Smiths Want You to Know Meat is Still Murder
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
My Reaction Whenever Somebody Sings Journey For Karaoke
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Adam Green (Moldy Peaches) Totally Looks Like Julian Casablancas (The Strokes)
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Epicute: Pancake Pops
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
ROFLMAO!!!!
win!
Besides the disgust of all, what did you win?
On topic, poor dear George! Daddy got him the presidency, and it wound up
just like the Governorship, and the baseball team before that! *sniff*
Ask his daddy to buy him a Shopvac.
HAHAHAHAH *cough* *sputter* BAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
heheheheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Shop vac is too big. he needs a hand held vaccum
I dunno…. I think Harriet and Condi might have had an inkling to do so. Ew. I just grossed myself out.
Double header…
Condi? Oh man, those teeth…
racsist.
Teeth have a race? Odd.
Anyone remember what group Condi was addressing when she said “As I was saying to my husb- :ahem: As I was saying to the president…”
From [LINK]
Fun Fact: Condi Rice sat on the board of Chevron, which named an oil
tanker after her.
Oh, except for Karl Rove, who won’t stop asking…
LMAO! Karl Rove had to settle for Cheney, but that’s worse than the deal
Scooter Libby got…
No,no, you have it backwards —
all Republcans aspiring to the presidency have to service Karl Rove.
of course to get to Karl Rove, you have to do Limbaugh first.
I would be very happy to blow you………..with my gun.
I’d blow him… away!
It’s a good thing he is not president anymore, if he were the feds would have PK shut down…
That’s because you’re not patriots…
How do you figure?
The President’s farts smell of sandal wood… any patriot knows that
Now you’re just being silly.
You must be one of those UnAmericans. You know, like one of
those people who come from an UnAmerican part of the U.S.?
Arizona?
Arizona voted American, so you’re not from an
UnAmerican area. Perhaps you’re like me, one of those
UnAmerican people living in an American part of
America?
Maybe? What about Illinois? That’ s my current home of residence.
What are you asking, Comrade?
What about Australia? Is that an UnAmerican part of America? Or is it just plain not American at all?
i’d think gitmo would fit. charro, are you actually in gitmo?
*rattling of handcuffs and shackles*
No….
*unlocks charro and gives her husband the key. Pats him on the shoulder and leaves a Two Knotty Boys book behind as well as some fresh ginger and a light weight flogger*
*giggles*
Pretty doubtful; Bush-bashing was all over the net and so far as I know none of it was shut down. Some people are lobbying for the fairness doctrine to shut out conservatives, but hopefully it won’t gain much ground – better if both sides (and other sides altogether) are left to do their thing freely. Mocking politicians is a time-honored tradition, going back to our earliest days.
Well, I was joking. But threatening to kill the president =/= mocking the president.
Threatening to kill the President is, in fact, against the law. There are highly trained people who are paid a lot of money to take those threats seriously. It’s a bad idea to step over that line. I sure as hell wouldn’t do it, no matter what I thought of the pathetic little buffoon.
It’s because you keep getting them killed… if you didn’t keep breaking them they wouldn’t take it so seriously…
Er, I like your stuff…but you completely lost me here.
It’s probably because I’m 48 years old and don’t have television, and I go to bed before all the good stuff happens anyway.
* Abraham Lincoln
* James A. Garfield
* William McKinley
* John F. Kennedy
what do these people have in common?
They all have vowels in their names?
They all should have stayed in bed?
All of their mothers were proud of them?
Hey, we’re still doing better than Australia- they just plain LOST one of their Prime Ministers. One moment he’s swimming in the surf, the next, gone like last year’s campaign promise.
BTW, speaking of Australia: I know it’s a large country and all, but Eddie, you aren’t being affected by the catastrophic fires down there, are you?
(Oops, silly question. If he was, he wouldn’t be reading this.)
Lost one as opposed to 5 shot (four fatalities)… if you say so…
Hey, at least we know where they are. Much more responsible, imo.
Some people? Who are those people lobbying for the fairness doctrine, annie? That’s been Rush’s bugaboo for quite a while now but nobody can ever support the claim with a quote.
Even if that proposition had a grain of truth, the fairness doctrine wouldn’t “shut out” conservatives. The unthinkable horror it would do is require the media to provide equal time for opposing views.
I’ve been saying what you just did for months now, Slan, but I finally found a liberal talk show host who wants to talk about the Fairness Doctrine. Bill Press, who broadcasts out of D.C. is no longer heard in his home market, because the conservative who owns the liberal talk station there thinks there’s need for another sports talk station. He’d like to suggest that owners who have multiple stations in a single market be required to offer a liberal talk station if they also have a conservative talk station. (I don’t personally support this, btw.)
I tell you, if I could just get a five million dollar loan, I’d start buying stations and putting liberal talk all over the country. I’m convinced I would make tons of money, especially in the red parts of the country, where liberals feel the most isolated and besieged.
Senator Debbie Stabenow, for one (with a slight conflict of interest.) [link]
I don’t know if it has widespread support among rank-and-file liberals; but at the least they sometimes don’t seem to understand what the implications of such a doctrine would be, real-world. Realistically it would shut out conservative radio and overall it’s just a monster of a thing to try to police – people can’t even agree on what’s left and what’s right; how practical any enforcement could ever be is bizarre to try to comprehend.
How about we let people who have popular radio shows continue broadcasting if they are popular, get endorsements, and manage to make competitive ratings with their shows, whatever political stripe? It makes a lot more sense NOT to try to censor the airwaves and let people speak their minds freely.
You can add Senator Harkin too {Hteeteepee colon//sayanythingblog dot com/entry/yet_another_democrat_comes_out_in_favor_of_the_fairness_doctrine/}
Looks like it’s a genuine movement in the legislature at this point [link]. Leftist NPR with our tax money isn’t enough; getting advertisers and building a show people like (i.e. competing in a free market with free airwaves) isn’t enough; somebody is so paranoid it’s necessary to move towards shutting down actual opposing views. Go figure.
I thought this was pretty funny. Goes well with his expression, I guess.
I agree. It’s the wrinkled-chin and pouting lips. That’s his “thinking face,” it seems. I was hoping to see your “Seven Minutes” lol up here. Not only is it funny, but it would also make for fun comments.
Maybe tomorrow! *crosses fingers*
Thanks, rho! You never know, it could turn up.
Bush totally looks like a muppet *link*
What do you have against muppets?
Muppets are entertaining, and potentially hilarious, although not entirely useful.
-
Much like Bush.
LOL – good one.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…inhaling…HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
I lol just from reading your comment Breesus. You, sir, win.
*Salutes*
Not even Laura? Well I guess that’s not really THAT surprising…
I’m not sure she can after that level of surgery…
Well now see that’s where his size comes in handy.
But then again … [link]
“Democrats in Congress are upset and want it known that President Barack Obama has a bigger penis than President Bush. ”
That is disturbing on a number of levels.
Lesson for today: Read more than the lead paragraph if you post
a link. Gack. Here’s a better *link*
so you’re saying that bush has a ‘stunt penis’?
[link]
why do I keep screwing up my email. oh well, at least I get to see other pretty icons…yeah
Incorrect email or not, that is DAMN funny.
Nonsense. Millions of us prayed someone would give you a blowjob in the Oval Office so we could finally get you impeached the way Clinton was. I would have done it myself if I could be sure it would have worked.
I think catching him in a compromising position with a kitten would be more likely to shock the country into impeachment.
You still think Clinton was impeached over a blowjob?
Bush wasn’t a sexual predator, so he had other sorts of problems in the position; I guess that’s to be expected.
TBH, the only case they ever made was the Lewinsky one… but I’d agree, Billy has some serious tiles loose when it comes to women…
Unlike the likes of your fine self …
They never proved that, nor have they found a single bone fragment…
LOL
All I can say is ‘God bless pigs’…
What is the body weight to hog consumption ratio again?
I’m thinking four hogs is enough, but should I rent an
extra, just to be sure? (Sorry, but my mailman has GOT
to go.)
welll let’s start with a hogshead of stout.
after that, eh, who cares
I read that as “snout,” and got really scared.
pig snouts scare you? they’re really good grilled.
Not my thing is all. While you’re munching,
I’ve linked some funny toons.
after drinking a hogshead of stout, you won’t really care about the snouts, or anything else for that matter.
thanks for the link, #3 is funny
YW! that was my favorite, too. I nearly said
so, but everyone’s sense of humor is differ-
ent, and mine usually dwells along the edges.
What’d your mailman do, Rho?
I ask because I want to stay on your good side.
The list is too long, but, for starters, he whistles
Country & Western tunes…
DEATH TO THE MAILMAN.
Welcome aboard!
*offers Elbie a plate of cookies shaped like
pit bulls and letter carriers*
*plays with her food*
Reminds me of a joke:
A guy gets a parrot to impress a lady he knows. He talks her into coming back to his apartment, but when she gets there, the parrot begins to swear loudly and imaginitively. A nonstop barrage of profanity assaults them as he tries putting the cover over the cage. When that doesn’t work, he grabs the parrot and tries stuffing it in a cabinet. The somewhat muffled profanities continue, and he pulls the parrot out and throws it into the freezer. The parrot continues to swear for a short time, then falls silent.
The man tries to get a little something started, but his date is horrified by both the parrot and the man’s violent action in stifling the parrot, and leaves almost immediately. He stalks over to the freezer, murder in his eyes. He pulls open the door, and the parrot takes one look at him and begins to speak:
“Hey, I’m really sorry about that little outburst. I was really out of line. I can see I caused you a great deal of trouble, and I can promise you nothing like this will ever happen again.” A couple heartbeats pass as bird and man eye one another. “Umm, by the way… what did the chicken do to piss you off?”
rent snatch… watch the part where bricktop breaks down a hogs consuption rate. or you could click my link… and scroll just about halfway down.
Thank you!
That was exactly what I was asking for.
Somebody posted the same quote for the “curry to
a pisshead” line, and it sounded like a great movie.
*adds movie to list*
*peers through binoculars for mailman*
it’s a good film. brad pitt runs around in his undies for a bit in it and he’s in “fight club” shape… so it’s back when he was worth looking at.
plus it’s a great story. you’ll have to make sure to watch it twice though. the first time you’re barely keeping up with the story, the second time you can really see the plot unfold as it’s moving along (typical guy ritchie fashion… just like “lock stock and 2 smoking barrels” which is also an incredible film).
see [LINK] for pitt picture. it’s small, but you’ll get the idea.
I own the movie on DVD and one of the fun things is that amongst the subtitle choices is “Pikey / Come Again?”
If you can’t understand Pitt, turn on that feature and you’ll get subtitles for just his lines. It’s a hoot to try to understand him without it.
Wow–Thanks again, TOS, and thanks for the
“translation” tip, Iowa.
Have either of you seen Belizaire the Cajun?
I’ve heard Cajun accents my whole life, but
there are places in this film that required
extensive use of rewinding and context.
Awesome film, though, if you like interesting
character work and historical fiction.
[LINK]
i know of it, but no, i haven’t seen it. is it any good?
Clinton has credible accusations of rape following him as well as countless accusations of sexual predatoriness. Predatorism? Hillary had the “bimbo eroption squad” FFS. WE KNOW what he was about. A BJ from a willing apprentice was NOTHING. Really, nothing.
Of Course Obama is not Clinton – I dare say there’s nothing like that following this guy. He just gets nailed on “fisting” charges LOL. With his WIFE. Pfft. No deal there.
Those are some pretty stout words. They
sound hauntingly similar to those famously
spewed by dear Ann Coulter…
I assume you’re referring to Juanita
Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey. Broaddrick’s
accusation came over 20 years after the
fact, and was not credible enough to
convince Kenneth Starr to pursue it. In fact,
her story was full of holes. Check out the
bullet points in the [LINK].
Kathleen Willey claims that Clinton groped
her, but she told her buddy Linda Tripp that
she and he “smooched.” Willey also didn’t
have any trouble lying to the FBI on more
than one occasion, changing her testimony,
and so forth.
Clinton probably cheated on his wife several
times, but nothing I’ve read rises to the level
of justifying your extreme language.
“Countless accusations” is a phrase for
chumps, and your use of the word “credible”
is off the map.
He cheated on his wife. Making any more of
it than you can back up is wrong.
[LINK] Wiki on Kathleen Willey, including:
Here’s the original spew from Ann Coulter:
“Before criticizing others for being ‘mean’ to
women, perhaps Hillary should talk to her
husband who was accused of rape by Juanita
Broaddrick and was groping Kathleen Willey
at the very moment Willey’s husband was
committing suicide.”
Much as it pains me to potentially be
endorsing Ann coulter, there’s just been too
much noise in the Clinton background for
me to believe much better than the worst
of him. Being a sexual predator doesn’t
mean he was ‘bad’ at his job, but it does
make one wonder at how many bodies
there are in the foundations, since stress is
a major cause of SSAs doing their thing….
I was thinking more of the Paula Jones
complaint (out of court settlement) and the
later harrasment of Elizabeth Gracen to keep
her silence over what is, to all appearances,
a consensual one-nighter.
One thing I can say, based upon the
definition Billy Whizz given, to whit:
Based on that definition of intercourse, he didn’t commit perjury
Continued, since points 2 and 3 are so vague that one could be said to have have intercourse in a crowed elevator…
Thus the defintion was reduced to
Ann Coulter said that Clinton’s extramarital
affairs were not consensual. She committed
slander, any way you look at it.
Anniee implied that he was a rapist and a
sexual predator. Sorry, but no banana.
Neither would surprise me…
Coulter’s probably just pissed that he never made a pass at her.
Give it time…
“They never proved that”
`
“You don’t scare me; that could be anybody’s ass” — Mayor Quimby
President Clinton was impeached because he stood in the way of the right-wing agenda. The sex was just an excuse, and a pretty damned feeble one at that.
I thought it was because he perjured himself…
He perjured himself *about* getting a blowjob, so, without the
blowjob, the perjury may arguably have not occurred.
But if he had said “Yeah, she blew me”, would we still have impeached him?
The short answer is “no,” but I wonder what might have been
tried through “conduct unbecoming,” under the notion that
“Commander in Chief” is an officer rank.
He perjured himself after how many years of Republican attempts to impeach him?
Causes come before their effects, not after. The perjury was not the cause, it was the excuse. The cause of President Clinton’s impeachment was the fact that he stood in the way of right-wing agendas.
How so? I thought the right wing agenda was to get into Iraq and take their oil. That’s the same talking point that is thrown around. But in 1998, Clinton stood up in front of the nation in his State of The Union Address and expressed how badly Saddam needed to be stopped because there was no doubt he had weapons of mass destruction. He went on to say that even if there were not any weapons of mass destruction, from an ethical point of view, the US had to stop his daily violations of human rights and genocidal crimes.
And also he was impeached for lying under oath.
…about a blowjob.
Yah, it was pretty silly. But still, I believe they went on the notion that lying is lying, stealing is stealing blah blah. They didn’t really see a difference of degree
It depends upon who “they” are, evidently. Knowingly leading
the country into war with false intelligence isn’t as serious an
“oopsie” in some circles.
Rho, you know my politics, but I have to agree with you. They were trying to impeach Clinton for being immoral. I didn’t know realize immorality was a Federal crime. As for the lying, I honestly believe had he just come right out and said. “Yes, I did that”, it probably would have caught his detractors flat footed and they wouldn’t have known what to do. Let’s face it, he was caught out on an affair before he even became President, yet he was still elected. So chances are, nothing would have happened had he just fessed up.
I appreciate your candor, but, seriously, Bill was used
to getting away with his little hobby. In the same set of
circumstances, most men lie, imo. At the time, if even
half of the rumors are accurate, getting away with
adultery was a worn path for him at the time. If it had
not been for the blue dress, he would have probably
been successful that time, too.
“at the time” twice–sorry!
“In the same set of
circumstances, most men lie, imo. ”
Not to start a gender war here, but I have two thoughts:
1) Obviously, you don’t date women, or you’d know that lying isn’t exclusive to men.
2) Who, exactly, are all these liars sleeping with, if not women? (Larry Craig aside.) On behalf of my gender, I demand equal rights to call women lying, treacherous trollops!
I was only speaking of my opinion of male
cheaters, not men in general. That said, you
made a great point there. How about this?
Cheaters usually lie when caught.
I’m not down with the big brush stroke, except
to say that men will beg, steal, borrow, cajole,
perform needlessly wreckless acts–even
parrot killing–if they think their chances of
having sex will increase as a result.
Can you really blame a woman for occasionally
sticking out a leg when a charging bull runs by?
Yeah, I really don’t have a problem with people trashing men for our poor impulse control. As they say, the problem with stereotypes is how close they are to being accurate, not their inaccuracies.
Chris Rock said it best: most men are as faithful as their options.
Women lie before they even speak!
*points at any woman’s favorite pair of heels*
See, you’re not that tall, it’s a lie!
It’s a nice lie, and I love heels, but it does seem a bit deceptive.
*points at razor, aftershave and deodorant*
Yeah, well, you don’t really have a smooth face or smell all that good, so there!
*points to push up bras, high heels, perfume, razors, corsets though men wore those before too, hair extensions, hair dye, make up, gender statistics on cosmetic surgery*
You were saying… *smirks*
*points to sea of magazines telling women
what they ‘need’ to look like in order to
achieve success and happiness in life*
*points to double standard of appearance
acceptability norms in U.S. between men
and women*
I’m saying we should all be thankful for some of the hygiene/fashion lies we all put forward, as it makes the world a much more pleasant place to livein in so many ways!
@rho: Good point, although I’d like to see a few scudgy, smelly, buttcrack-showing guys around town take it up a notch in the appearance they find acceptable.
*swims in Rho’s sea of girly magazines*
*now smells like 268 different samples of perfume*
*gets dizzy and passes out*
*dispenses bottled air up Steve’s nose*
*grabs PA microphone*
“Diss, clean-up, Aisle 5, usual section”
*Thumbs through Rho’s girly magazines* Hey, these articles are all written by women!!! *thumbs back to the masthead* Hmm, that’s weird. They’re also *PUBLISHED* by women! Hmm, photographers, women… makeup artists, hairdressers, women… oh wait, there’s a fashion designer, he’s a guy… well, , for certain values of the word “guy”…
Do you think we would want straight guys
choosing our clothes???
*shudders at the thought*
*seconds PM’s point with extreme prejudice*
@Diss: Actually Hygiene isn’t a lie. Nothing I pointed out had anything to do with hygeine. I may be partial to smooth legs but I don’t pretend they are necessary or more clean than my own legs. Fashion tends to make the world a more banal place because it bases beauty off of somebody else’s standard. So while fashion might make it pretty for some, it is hardly pleasant. From the few models I have known and the girls I knew who wanted to be models, I can only begin to assume how unpleasant their lives are.
However, I will try to halt my rant here and simply state that I find women to be most beautiful when they are themselves and not trying to be a magazine cover. /rant
What? Just put on that tube top and miniskirt and let’s get out the door?!? Okay, you can wear the high heeled boots with the clear heals too, but let’s go the movie starts in thirty minutes! Man, why is it so hard for you gals to get dressed?!?
Yes, just dress a little better than a girl I would have to pay to be there and it will be fine…
Hang on, Mark! Jeez! Don’t forget what
happened the last time you rushed me in the
middle of my collagen injections…
Oh heck, lip symmetry is highly overrated. Of course, the last time that women’s defense group beat the crap out of me because they thought I gave you a fat lip.
Still, I don’t know why you waste all that time getting dressed, I’m just gonna have to take it all off as soon as we get home!
Mark got beat up by a girl… Mark got beat up by a girl… Mark got beat up by a girl…
@Mark:
Lebet’s skibip the movbie, Babbyb!
@DWN: “Actually Hygiene isn’t a lie. Nothing I pointed out had anything to do with hygeine.”
Sorry, I think I’m mentally grouping hygiene and general personal grooming. Also, I wasn’t responding specifically to your list of stuff, but more in a general sense, including what I’d previously mentioned (shaving, deoderant, etc.) But you are quite correct in that a person can be perfectly clean without doing much of anything other than showering regularly.
@rho: Oh no, you sound like a dental patient now. *sigh* Well, as long as you promise not to say anything coherent while we’re busy… I don’t think I can operate while listening to “Oh babbyb! Faster babbyb!” :blush:
Oh boy! You are all making me really glad my mother’s a tomboy! I can be ready to rock in 5 minutes, 10 if I have to shower, first!
But I have to second rhorho’s point about male standards of upkeep versus female standards. The available eye-candy for the hetero gal is
pretty lacking. Beer guts and all that. I’m just lucky that I like to look at women, too!
–and ‘ready to rock’ includes the heels and makeup, if I’m so minded!
@Mark: Nobody’s ever accused me of saying
anything coherent, so we’re in good shape!
@Viking: You’re not fooling the guys here.
All guys know what 10 minutes is in Woman
Time…
Actually, for this woman, it means 10 minutes. I missed the whole ‘hair must be perfect’ thing, and hate pantyhose. And I got used to changing fast while doing the sports thing (those away locker rooms could be COLD!)
But I can admire the primping process and results of another gal…rather like an anthropologist’s study, but still!
i don’t care what anyone says, for man or woman, natural is better.
i don’t want the ‘demo’, i want the reality
.
i think makeup looks horrible on women, esp the way so many of them cake it on. it ends up looking like [link]
LOL! I don’t take very long to get ready,
either, but (converted to real time) it takes
20 minutes *after* a bath if there is hair,
makeup, and jewelry involved. I live in an
old house, so 10 minutes covers getting
water in the tub while brushing teeth and
picking out clothes to wear.
You must have a great system.
or [link]
@Iowa: I agree. I’m not a big fan of founda-
tion, mainly because I’m vain and I think my
freckles look cute. Less is more, as they say.
Half the battle is picking out the clothes at an earlier, less-pressed time–often the day before. Less stress that way! The other half? I really don’t do much more to my hair than brush it. If it isn’t cooperating, up in a simple bun. Minimal makeup–I don’t like the feel of foundation or that sort of stuff any more that ‘Iowa’. Just enough to make the guy drool a bit!
My hair is in a swing bob, which is super
easy, but my hair is thick, so it takes more
than a minute with a blow dryer. Besides
the fact that foundation looks cakey, it feels
as bad as it looks, imo.
For the rest, I try to avoid drooling guys, but,
as they say, to each her own!
Yay for freckles!
And I’m only trying to make one particular guy drool. It is worth the extra effort every now and then!
I, too, only wear the shit when absolutely necessary. I see no reason to paint my face… I don’t much care how I look, nobody to impress here.
I cursed, PK ate my post
I don’t wear makeup either, never understood why putting coloured dirt on one’s face became so popular.
no it didn’t. it’s at the bottom
it fell out of it’s nest and landed on the ground
wait, it was there, i swear i saw it.
damn, maybe pk ate my brain
nevermind
i’m going to go play in the corner with by myself
Don’t worry. PK does that sometimes. It
happened to Danbala and me the first time
we ever had a conversation. We were talk-
ing about the words “administration” and
“ministry” in different government systems.
Danbala was new to PK at the time, and I
was surprised she wasn’t scared off by the
“bouncing posts.” Funny thing, but they all
wound up in place, eventually.
I get stubborn when stuff like that starts to happen. As if I imagine that some pettyminded Internet god was trying to break my spirits. For something to be “user friendly” to me it has to offer a certain amount of resistance or I get bored. :p
i knew i liked you
You have excellent taste.
You clearly didn’t read the rest of my post, you only honed in on the impeachment part.
Clinton advocated for the war in 1998, Bush was the only one with the balls to actually follow through with it.
Wasn’t it a Republican senate in 1998?
[LINK] Description of Operation Desert Fox, a series of
strategic military strikes carried out by a joint effort of
U.S. and British forces against Iraqi targets
It was a matter of brains, not balls. Many military
leaders suggest now that, as a result of Bush’s “balls,”
we will now need to maintain a presence in Iraq for
years to come, to the tune of 35,000 troops, iirc.
Problem is ‘brains not balls’ is crap TV… you can’t have that on CNN
Was I the only one who sat 6″ away from the
TV, watching shaky b/w smart bomb footage?
I know what you mean, and you’re right.
Nothing says “Pass the apple pie” like footage
of Tomahawks launching. Puppies in fatigue
pockets make great photos, and where would
we be without returning military cooks sharing
their poignant wisdom with us?
That world renowned strategist, my aged mother, has been saying this since 2003. The fact that anyone ever believed that Bush’s Operation Barbarossa was a ‘good’ idea is somewhat disheartening…
None of you are very bright. You are completely skipping the issue. Did Clinton say that Iraq had to be dealt with? Yes. But because of a brilliant political move, Bush takes the fall, and those with bad memory (basically the whole nation except a few intelligent individuals) fail to recall that Bill Clinton called for the Iraq to be dealt with. LINK
or maybe this vid
@LOL: Operation Desert Fox was initiated
*after* Clinton’s speech. Nobody’s denying
he said what he said before ODF. It’s a given.
You stopped short of saying that Clinton ever
did anything about Iraq’s non-cooperation.
By that omission, you implied that he did
nothing, so I brought up ODF. Saying that
we’re not bright in the same post that
demonstrates a reading fail is not bright.
I do apologize for the personal insult.
But the use of the word “fail” constantly makes it difficult to differentiate PK from /b/
“Constantly?”
I’m not responsible for all instances of the
word “fail” on PK. I’m not crazy about it,
either, but it’s part of the parlance here.
IIRC, this was my only use of “fail” for the
past week, possibly two or more.
You catch more flies with honey, if that helps.
Anyway, I accept your apology.
Sorry didn’t mean to direct that at you. The overuse of the word “fail” is way too reflective of 4chan, and notably /b/ aka the dredges of the internet.
Thanks for that, and we agree.
I have lurked on /b/ before. At first I was amused….then horrified.
I went to 4chan once, but haven’t been on /b/.
I’ll go there tomorrow, and file a report.
(I haven’t been horrified in a while.)
I think it’s n cleaned up quite a bit since i last saw it
Okay, I’m there and back. I don’t like the
format. What’s up with all of the people
being “Anonymous,” anyway?
It wasn’t horrifying, at any rate, but my bar
was probably lower than yours in the first
place.
Wow. Humans are the strangest people ever.
It’s fascinating that people would work to
tear down and disrupt. I’ve never under-
stood the motivation behind destructive
hackers, etc.
Anyway, /b/ is now pretty bland, it seems.
When you said you were previously
“horrified,” I didn’t know what to expect, as
different people have different tolerance
levels for things. For all I know, split
infinitives might send you to a plane of
terror no one should know.
No, wait: That’s me…
Way to take one for the team, Freddie. Yipes.
that’s an absolute WIN
it wins, in the disguting department *needs more brain bleach*
I think there are two ts in disgutting…
You are correct sir.
dis-gutting. the process by which guts are added to someone who is currently gutless.
I thought it was like seppuku…
seppuku (切腹) is gutting. dis-gutting then would be putting them back, or in this case, putting them there in the first place.
i knew the term harakiri of course, but i’d never heard seppuku. thanks
See below… disgutting and gutting would be like flammable and inflammable.
you are in a mood today aren’t you?
since ‘disgutting’ isn’t a real word, you’re more than welcome to define it as you wish, and I will define it as i wish. i say it’s a construct which denotes the opposite of the base word, as in all of the following examples:
disassemble
discolored
disallow
discontinue
disorganized
discomfort
disconnect
disapprove
disadvantage
distasteful
dishonest
And you claim I’m in a mood…
Have an internet…
apparently, you are
have a [link]
personally, i find this [link] to be more frightening
Hmmm…. now I’ll have to ponder the semantic difference between dis-gutting and gutting…
it’s like flammable and inflammable
or rabble and adorabble …
It’s joke like that killed Vaudeville…
the death of vaudeville [link] (really poor quality version)
ok, so judging by most of the comments, people find this one at least somewhat funny. why is it then that it rates so low, and that every time i refresh the page, the vote count goes up by several.
.
it’s almost as if there’s someone sitting in his moms basement eating donuts and drinking mountain dew who’s voting ’1′ continuously.
.
nah, no one is that pathetic, are they?
Gah…it’s MY OWN basement.
I’m kinda sad in a way, it seems Bush never received my letters.
Erm, you’ll find they are…
makes me wonder if it’s just nobama08, or if he has his legion of internet super-losers working in tag team.
“.
it’s almost as if there’s someone sitting in his moms basement eating donuts and drinking mountain dew who’s voting ‘1′ continuously.
.
nah, no one is that pathetic, are they?”
`
Certainly not! They’re Pop-Tarts, not donuts.
Hey, there’s nothing wrong with Mountain Dew addicts!
Of course they didn’t. What would have been the point? It’s not like that, or anything else, would have gotten him impeached.
Look at it this way… when you’ve had a guy who’s been on the hill since Nixon in your corner, it’s unlikely anyone is going to try and make trouble over much less than you double tapping someone on live network news…
i think that captioning this picture in such a way is disrespectful, even to a former president who not many people liked.
and besides, has anyone ever noticed that all the picture captions on this website seem to lean farther to the left than George Soros?
“high volume of submissions” my ass … the editors just pick and choose the liberal ones over the conservative ones! “what makes you think that?” you may ask. well, it’s because my more conservative-minded captions have been consistently rejected. i realize the internet is a free country, and that the fairness doctrine is a bad idea … but c’mon, pundit kitchen. at least be honest about the preferred types of posts, instead of giving us this “high volume of submissions, therefore everyone’s not going to get theirs posted” crap. we know better.
No, you’re probably just not funny…
or you probably just can’t appreciate a well-reasoned argument when you see one….
Or maybe we’ve just heard this a billion times.
TBH, if you’re going to get a wounded ego over making them and not getting them on the front page, then I’d advise you not to make them…
Brilliant advice! Why didn’t the Smuuth Criminal figure that out if he is so smart?
Because he’s a social conservative. It’s an entitlement thing…
He probably had God on his side too, with the bible passages to
back it up…
*smacks forehead*
What would I do without you?
Bigger question, what would you actually do with him?
Well it wouldn’t involve ginger, that’s for sure.
pfffft, as one of the few Republicans ’round these parts, your argumet is falling on deaf ears. I have made peace with this issue ages ago and advise you do the same. Otherwise your going to spin yourself up over nothing, or even worse, become one of the hated neo-con trolls.
Damn, Arnold’s back…
No, it’s you. It’s just the uncanny resemblance that tricked you.
Don’t worry, it’s gotten me once or twice, too.
Eddie, if you’re a social conservative (bible constitution et al) you hide it very well…
I’ll say I have my beliefs, but I’m more of a Moderate Republican rather then a So-Con. But thanks for noticing!
Have an Obama Lol…
I’ve made a bunch (no, not mean ones, just kind of funny) but when I submit them it’s always at ICHC – so I have no idea if they make it here or not.
I’ve made a few, as you’ve seen
I got one on the front page in October… TBH I do them for my own amusement…
You amuse yourself very well!
Oooooooh, that is a good one. I hadn’t thought of that but I was wanting to make a religious reference. I will bow to your superior mockery skills at least this once.
forfend! you’ll make me blush!
Given a different sexuality and a plane ticket, I could do more than make you blush…
and an Ice Skater one…
You know, I have a disreputable cousin who really did bite another disreputable cousin’s ear off…
But not a first cousin…
So what you’re saying is ear-biting doesn’t run in the family?
No, no…
They’re second cousins once or twice removed I think….
They’re the crazy, numerous /Glaswegian (Catholic end) branch of the family and they’ve probably cooled off in their old age…
So no, I don’t bite ears. I’m a vegetarian. (Although, on the other side of the family there’s said to be a cannibal princess. (but that’s probably just a story…))
That leaves SO MANY questions hanging…
I wanna hear the rest of the story! *pops popcorn*
The cannibal story? Well, the story was that she lived in the south seas and some great great uncle or other came along in his pirate ship and married her.
The uncle was definitely was definitely a sailor but I the pirating and the princess probably owe a lot to the imagination of my Papa and his willingness to scare children…
Still, I like a good story…
(The ear story’s true btw.)
*I think the
So, it’s sort of late 19th C?
Probably… too late for pirates, I imagine…
Depends on the region
Bay of Cowloon had pirate problems until the
early 1920s…
There’s absolutely scads of pirates off Somalia right now.
My favorite pirate is Jean Lafitte, who worked
in the Gulf of Mexico at the turn of the 18th-
19th Centuries. One story goes that, two
days after Louisiana Governor Claiborne
offered a $500 reward for Lafitte’s capture,
handbills were posted all over New Orleans
offering a similar award for the governor.
(The likelihood of Lafitte being behind the
handbills is debatable, but why kill a good
pirate story?)
[LINK] Wiki
I was always quite impressed by Anne Bonny and Mary Reed for being female pirates…
That’s kind of a cute story. I wish my family had good stories like that. (Although we might be related to Ivana Trump…)
I can really really see a buttload of humor in the ice skater picture, but I can’t quite think of what to have the one whispering to the other. I’m hoping someone else hits it.
As you can see, I went for the Hannibal Lecter approach… otherwise it was nothing but tATu jokes
Despite their lesbian act was a ruse, I did enjoy watching them together in the videos. Then I realized what level of sad pervert I had hit and stopped watching them. Like a groundhog seeing his shadow…
That being taTu I was referencing for those who didn’t have enough caffeine this morning…
“Like a groundhog seeing his shadow…”
And biting New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg? [link]
That was just funny!
Did it need shots or did they just put it down?
Oh, look! It’s a conservative who believes that the media are biased against him! How refreshing!
Kid, didja notice that the Republican party is wildly unpopular right now, especially among people of the ages that typically inhabit the interwebs?
Add that to the fact that people typically don’t find whining to be very entertaining, and you don’t need to imagine some kind of liberal editors’ conspiracy to explain why conservative-minded captions are “constantly rejected”.
I’m sure there are plenty of conservative places on the web where whining is popular. Why not go try out your work there?
There was a time it was all the Jews, then it was the Blacks, now it’s the Gay-Liberal agenda…
I think the “abortionists” came between the Blacks and Gay-Liberal agenda, right?
As an atheist, I eagerly await my turn.
That’s been a noise since Bush I said you’re not an American…
Somewhere between the Blacks and the Gays were all those pesky
women and their “Women’s Lib” crap.
well, you all stick your nose in from time to time:
)
first you didn’t want forced labor.
then you wanted the vote.
then you were against drinking (
then you were against spousal abuse
then you wanted to work
then you actually wanted to get paid what you were worth for the work you did
then you wanted to get into politics – you actually wanted to be allowed to speak in public!
then you were somehow under the impression that you owned your bodies, not men, please
.
you women just never let up!
What were we thinking? Thanks to those derned Women’s
Libbers, we may not get doors opened for us soon! Can you
imagine the chaos? All of those women, standing by all of those
doors, scratching their heads, thinking “How do they do that?”
More men are losing their jobs than women these days, and there
may be a brief time soon during which women will comprise the
majority of employed people for the first time in U.S. history.
[LINK]
“there
may be a brief time soon during which women will comprise the
majority of employed people for the first time in U.S. history.”
Is there anyone who believes that has nothing to do with the fact that women tend to be paid less than men?
I was noticing the fact that the majority of areas that women occupy tend to be least affected by economic hardship. Still an interesting fact though.
i didn’t say i was a REPUBLICAN, i said i was “conservative.” there’s a big difference, sir.
and my post was not to whine, but to simply point out that if Pundit Kitchen is going to be so biased towards a liberal point of view, then they ought to at least ACKNOWLEDGE that fact.
i’m not stupid. i realize that Pundit Kitchen is a private entity, and as such has the perfect freedom to discriminate against opinions the admins don’t like … just like the Boy Scouts have the perfect freedom to discriminate against homosexuals and atheists because such individuals’ life decisions run entirely counter to the mission of the Boy Scouts, and the Boy Scouts are a private entity, therefore it’s permissible.
does that one hit close to home? i hope it does.
You’re one of THOSE conservatives… oh dear…
“oh dear [...] one of THOSE conservatives”??? what does THAT mean? if you’re insinuating that i am consistent with my principles, then i will gladly plead guilty as charged. none of this neo-con “let’s spread democracy through waging war on other sovereign nations” crap for me.
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… has a great line in Phelps slogans….
Have one of my Lols…
Excellent! I wonder how much Captain Hazelwood should
get…
another brilliant example of attempting to concoct cute phraseology without trying to come up with a coherent counterpoint … you really have run out of coherent comebacks, haven’t you?
Another brilliant example of overuse of vocabulary for the sole purpose of making oneself look more articulate. Also, now you’re just picking fights just because. =)
My dog’s name is LB, and I was at the gym when all this happened.. THus, my dog was alone with my computer. This makes me giggle.
Woof.
Thanks LB.
This calls for ear scratches, at least.
-rolls over on back, panting-
you never had a coherent opening… there’s nothing to discuss…
so you’re not even going to respond to my argument? not exactly the type of mature response i expected…
There’s nothing to respond to… it’s not statement, it’s not anything…
Addendum… It is most certainly not an argument…
If you want to “argue” with Unc you’re going to have to come up with a different tactic that isn’t so childishly baiting.
Peals before swine… social conservatives are
basically busy bodies who want to legislate
their world view… liberals try to take your cash,
social conservatives try to stick their nose in to
every part of your life just in case someone is
having a good time… and if you are make it
illegal
So he won’t appreciate my good advice?
No. He won’t
*pout* Last time I give good advice.
Addendum: We’re dealing with someone
who thinks that homosexuality is ‘lifestyle
choice’. Atheism, which is a lifestyle choice,
can be discriminated against if someone so
wishes. I know I discriminate against loud God
Botherers. However, when it comes to picking
and choosing over a subject with is more or
less the same as eye colour, then I find it
offensive.
But he knows he’s right, thus…
Oh, I missed that part.
That is extremely offensive.
i will always contend that religion is more of a lifestyle choice than atheism, but be that as it may, religion is still a choice, and not always a healthy one, yet, they feel the right to demand and receive ‘special rights’ which include not granting similar rights to others.
.
none are so blind as they who will not see.
He equated the apparent discrimination here
as valid ad the scouts discrimination against
gays, like they’re equivalent ‘lifestyle choices’.
I have many very dear, gay friends, but I
can safely say, I’ve never been tempted to
give it a whirl… I’ve liked girls as long as I
can remember. I’ve not met a gay person
who wasn’t the same about their gender
attraction…
I think religion is am holdover from a more primitive time when we had no idea how things worked and needed a reason for being.
Having “parent(s)” in the sky helped us with that.
Now we know how things work and it seems religion has become a way to DENY the way things work.
*a holdover
I think religion’s purpose (not always its
outcome) is to make life easier in many
ways:
1. Imposing a sense of human fairness onto
an unfair planet: “He’s rich, but he’s crooked,
so he’s going to Hell, and we good, not-as-
rich people will go to Heaven.”
2. Ruling otherwise chaotic groups of
people: “We can have sex now, because
we’re married, so God approves.”
3. Rationalizing the primitive: “It’s okay to
kill them because God is on our side.”
4. Taking the fear out of death: “Well, Aunt
Agnes is in a Better Place now…”
There are probably others, but those are my
big four.
Pretty much have to agree here. Religion came out of a sense of not knowing and now it is being used as a reason to not learn.
As for homosexuality, I am with Fester. When I was younger and more than a bit confused, I did try my best friend but it just felt wrong and odd and out of place. Needless to say, I am very sure of my heterosexuality…
Realized I should put a bit of perspective on my confusion as my previous statement could have been taken wrong.
High five!
i don’t know what Supreme Court case law you’re reading, but according to *Boy Scouts of America v. Dale*, the BSA has the constitutional privilege of discrimination by virtue of being a private entity. it’s all these other court of appeals cases that are wrongfully deciding cases against the Boy Scouts.
Like that one? The one where it was decided that it was
unconstitutional for a town to lease the Scouts a building on a
radically reduced rate?
Surely if you beleive one thing, then it’s obvious that the scouts
should get no preferential treatment from local or national govt.
You’re missing the point. We can see right through you, because apparently you seem to argue just for the sake of arguing. People who frequent here have already heard the “PK is too liberal” whining countless times and have already tried to beat the answer into your skulls (which is evidently not working).
If you would like any people to take your arguement seriously, or pay attention at all for that matter, please scroll up, stare long and hard at the picture + caption, rephrase your words, and come back later.
And if you didn’t understand what I was requesting you to do, perhaps you should look at it this way: No one cares that you can cite supreme court cases against Boy Scouts of America. This thread is about presidential blowjobs and lack thereof.
Good day to you sir.
Like I said… walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… sounds like a Phelps.
This is the type of conservative that gives fiscal conservatives a bad name…
well said!
.
bj’s for everybody!!!
My treat! ;D
…Except Bush. No bj’s for Bush.
what are you, the bj nazi?
no bj for you!
nah, i can’t blame you for that one, but you’re going to be awfully busy, and sore…
Lip balm…
Brilliant!
you’ve had experience i see
I had chapped lips, yes.
I have my own service provider but it is the thought that counts…
Curseth you, my evil plot hath been foiled! -shakefist-
I’m a girl..
ppppbbbbbbpbbpbpbbbbbpbpbpbpbpbbtttttt!
Is that the sound it makes when you give a bj?
no… cunnilingus. Try it sometime…
Oh, my… well I suppose if anyone was wondering about your skills or lack thereof, that answers it for them…
I have tried it but I don’t recall ever making that noise… I’ll try that next time. Hopefully I’ll be able to keep from laughing.
if that fails you just gently peel the skin back with your teeth and make tiny circles with the tip of the tongue…
simple.
How does one make tiny circles with the tip of their tongue while holding the skin in their teeth?
This method works for many things…
Or so I’ve been told. >.>
like peel-and-eat shrimp, not that i’m commenting on size mind you.
.
some of us come pre-peeled btw (thanks in part to morons like kellogg)
You’re making me into Deathwurm here…
OK, you basically push forward over the clitoral head,
with a gap between your upper and lower jaw such that the head becomes proud of the hood… then it’s a matter of concentration and co-ordination….
There… happy now?
I’m imagining Tony the Tiger wielding a butcher’s knife maniacally…
Yes, thank you Unc.
See above
The Tony the Tiger thing was aimed at Iowa…
they’re grrrrrrreeeaaat!
[link]
I actually snorted when I laughed at that one.
Is that you imagining your face is a Maserati?
*waits for somebody to get the reference*
.[link]
Yeah, no one gets The Nuge anymore. Is it the whole hunting thing?
Or the whole loud redneck thing?
*raises hand*
I have Stranglehold on my mp3 player. It still kicks butt.
I thought the Whole ‘Loud Redneck’ thing was now called The house of Representatives.
oh, you mean the house of representatives that is constituted of a clear majority of liberals?? yeah, that redneck consortium….
what did you say was your first language?
He’s fluent in stoopid.
LOL!! (He may spell it “stuupid,” though.)
no discrimination. you can have one too!
SCORE
oops blockquote fail. the second grouping are my words of course.
Oh lawd.
-stifles chuckle-
As a boy scout i do not want a gay 2 inches to my left in pitch black on a hill.
how about in the parlor with a candlestick?
Or on a train?
Or in the rain?
I would not, could not, in a tree!
Not in a car! You let me be!
I do not like them here or there.
I do not like them anywhere!
I do not like open minds or honor
I do not like things that scare me.
Conor.
Would he, could he, on a boat?
Would he, (has he?), with a goat?
I could do this all night…
[LINK].
*link*
aaaaand tharitis.
Awww that’s sweet. We’ll make note of your objections and put them in the circular file, you intolerant little shit.
As a boy scout i do not want a gay 2 inches to my left in pitch black on a hill.
You’re a good Boy Scout. Everyone else seemed to miss it, but I
appreciate your “Safety First” attitude.
Wake up, people: A hill could be dangerous!
Why on EARTH do you think they’d be interested in you? You seem
to have an inordinately high opinion of your innate appeal on the
sexual level…
Twerp.
Which raises another point– most heterosexual people, male or female, at some point have had the experience of wanting to turn down the advances of someone of the opposite sex. Why is it any more difficult or traumatic to turn down teh advances of somebody of the same sex? Seems like it might even be easier because if you have no interest in the same sex, it’s simple enough to say so rather than having to get into all those ways (“Um..I like you as a friend.”) of trying to tell someone of the opposite sex you aren’t attracted to them without hurting their feelings more than necessary.
IT was a partial defence for the killers of Matthew Shepard. It certainly convinced the local clergy enough to get them to try and pressure MS’ father in to asking for the killers not to get the needle (as it happened, Mr S didn’t beleive the death penalty achieved much, but he admitted in court that the pressure almost made him ask for it…)
I’m well aware that it freaks some people the eff out, I’m trying to explore why that is, exactly. Are they scared they’ll say yes?
Sorry, I was filling in background, and there’s no
evidence of ‘gay rage’ in the Shepard case, just ass-
hole lawyers playing the gay card to get two tweaking,
rednecked, freaks off a murder rap…
“As a boy scout i do not want a gay 2 inches to my left in pitch black on a hill.”
`
as a woman i do not want a straight man anywhere near me because obviously all straight men want to rape all women all the time… right?
Oh look! A conservative who can’t stop from whining, and who apparently doesn’t realize he’s doing it!
That “liberal bias” thing got old well over a decade ago. If you people had a leg to stand on you wouldn’t have to keep resorting to that nonsense.
You have to understand where we’re coming from, and why it seems like our conservative voices are being drowned out by the liberals. Think for a second: How many newscasters on ABC, NBC, CBS, and any other news source (outside of FOX, we’ll get to them in a second) can you name the political affiliations of? Pretty much all of them, right? And I’d be willing to bet that about 98% of those you can name are Democrat (we’re not talking about old school newscasters either, they were singularly unbiased in that almost no one knew their personal politics. We’re simply talking about people who have been giving us the news for the past, say, 15 years). Now, think about the ones you can’t name the political affiliations of. Do you think they are Republican, or do you really not know?
-
The point a lot of Conservatives try to make (and badly) is that we seem to be drowned out by these guys. If someone is open about their Conservative politics, they are either put on FOX news, or drummed out as being biased, even though they may not be. John Stossell may be the exception, but he’s not really a newscaster. He’s more of a commentator, which can have any type of bias needed to make a point.
-
Then we go over to FOX news. It doesn’t matter that these guys may be giving the exact same story as the guys over on CNN, because they are openly Conservative, they are considered biased. THeir commentators are obscenely biased, but they make no bones about it. But the newscasters. Ah, the newscasters. They can’t win for losing.
-
Do you see how the Conservatives can’t seem to get a handle on ‘bias in the media’, because there is one? It doesn’t matter that all of the newscasters on CNN, HNNews, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, name your acronym are simply telling the news as it happens with bias from the commentators and not the newscasters, it seems like Conservatives are getting the raw deal because no one will openly admit to being a Conservative in the news. And when they do, they’re immediately branded as biased, regardless if they are or not.
-
It’s all perception, but you have to understand where we’re coming from.
It’s mostly the whiners who give the half way decent ones a bad name.
There again, I think that the fiscal conservatives need to disown the social conservatives, who seem to be arrogant busy-bodies who want to legislate everything to white, American, and repressed…
I’m with Fester. Why can’t Americans have a conservative fiscal policy, guns, AND drunken, casual sex? WHY?
It’s not like the Social Conservative doesn’t have drug fuelled sex with prostitutes and rent boys and then blames his doctor and the devil for him doing it…
we used to!
you’re describing what republican used to mean until they were taken over by the religious reich.
.
while the ‘drunken casual sex’ might not have been on the official party platform, they were about keeping out of the bedroom and keeping their laws away from personal behavior. so when you did have lots of sex, drunk or not, or drank a lot, sex or not, it wasn’t a scandal as long as you still did your job and didn’t kill anyone. it was behind closed doors, but not secretive.
.
then, the dems come along and say, hey, we’re all doing it anyway, what’s wrong with doing it in the streets (pushing the not just honest, but in-your-face honest platform). this scared republicans, prompting mayor quimby to state:
People, please! We’re all frightened and horny.
and left the door open for the religious reich to come in and try to cover up all of the drunken sex.
-
prior to this, the republicans were were fiscally responsible and for responsible gun ownership.
now they’re the party of spending and fear, hate and bigotry, thievery and lies. they lost everything good they used to be and have become the god party. basically, in their current incarnation, they’re a waste of time and space.
yup. so what is the replacement party going to be called? i kind of had hopes for the “blue party”. it sounds very patriotic and stuff.
hmm, do i hear contest!?
.
what would be a good name for a good american political party?
blue – the dems already have the color and it makes me think of blue balls, so i vote against that one.
.
it sure as hell isn’t going to be the green or independent party.
How about purple? It could take the best from
each side, and chunk the “baggage” issues.
When was this? Did I sleep through it?
in the us it was called the late ’60′s and early ’70′s. if you were anything like me then, you didn’t sleep through it, but still might not remember a great deal of it for ‘other’ reasons.
it’s also called every (bigger city) gay pride parade since what, the early to mid ’90′s.
You think coming on here and whining is going to do any good? You just sound bitter to me. If it’s a problem for you, go somewhere else. Nobody’s going to crop up and say, “by golly he’s right, we should all change our views!”
Least of all me! *crops back down and looks around sheepishly*
baa
Scottish mating call? I thought you were proud to be a virgin?
Oh and bile ye own heid before you start throwing your local slang at me.
You can’t tell me that old Tony B wasn’t just drinking down that man gravy…
BRB, sporking my eyes out to get that image out of my head…
Just imaging old Georgie guiding Tone’s head with those old, big ass, ears…
*puts fingers in ears, starts singing ABBA songs at top of voice*
That was foreplay…
see, that’s an advantage that obama has too, built in handles.
but can he breathe through them?
not sure about that, but i swear i saw him lift about 3 feet off the ground one day in a stiff breeze.
I think I done seen about everything, when I see and Obama fly….
hehe
[link]
In my version I have a crisp, sort of Jeeves, delivery…
and mine is more of an uncle remus delivery
all those childhood cartoons blend…
I find early 20th Century black film dialogue
sounds a lot funnier when delivered by Stephen
Fry as opposed to Rochester…
Side bar about Dumbo -the only people who
weren’t bast-ards in that movie were his
mother, the mouse, and the crows. The rest
should have burned in the tent…
Was that Obama or Criss Angel?
Just Can’t Let it Go : Week Three
Sad, really.
Week three? Oh, no, Honey. Clinton blowjob jokes have been going on since the blue dress days, over eight years ago.
Where have you been?
he could also go to [link] and attempt to look at the timeline of the captions and come to the conclusion that this one was actually done 6 or more weeks ago.
.
You can lead a right-winger to data, but you can’t make them think
*points* Look over there! *injects Iowa with dip tet booster*
You’ll thank me later…
expecting some rabid, biting responses are we?
eh, whateva
but thanks for the booster!
YW! *hands Iowa a lollipop for being good*
The rabies vaccine is given in a series, and I don’t have any
laying around. I think Unc has some, but tell him you want it
in the deltoid. He’s into mischief, you know.
oh yeah, you did say diphtheria tetanus didn’t you? i don’t know why i jumped to rabid – well, yes i do, but it was a mistake.
.
anyway, thanks for the sucker. after all of the bj talk earlier, i was getting a craving for err, ahh, hmm…something
I think they call it sumpin-sumpin, and the association of
trolls with rabies is a common mistake. That said, if you
ever see a troll being nice and *not* drooling, it’s time to
get on the phone to the authorities…
there is no “letting go”, bush will be discussed – and ridiculed – forever. you wouldn’t expect clinton-is-a-horndog jokes to stop, now would you? people are way angrier at bush. the jokes will continue, deal with it.
Eric Schwartz did offer, in October 2006 already. Search for “Clinton Got A Blowjob”…
I can’t believe they allowed this on the front page. It’s wonderful. Amazing….it…it doesn’t blow.
Awwwww!
This one makes me sad!
300th!
Fifth try. Slan Agat – the Unfairness Doctrine is most definitely being pushed for by Democrats in the legislature {link}
I tried to post this above and it wouldn’t take. No idea why
Maybe not blow, but surely blow up.