Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


And then he asked



political pictures for your blog

And then he asked “Is our children learning?” And to think you have to be born there to be president …

Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: heatherjlc

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 263 comments

  1. slaggingham says:

    Worst!

  2. Blarg says:

    ::yawn::

  3. n'at says:

    He will forever be misunderestimated. :’(

  4. agarota says:

    The one laughting is Lula, our president here in Brazil. The woman is Dilma Rousseff , minister of the presidential staff. I have no idea about the other guy…

    • Seth says:

      Did you here about the time that Cheney told Bush that three Brazilian soldiers were killed in Iraq? Bush was stunned, crying, “That’s terrible! Uh, wait, how many is a brazillion?”

  5. jwd says:

    still bashing Bush while Obama is already breaking campaign promises = FAIL

  6. lolspeaker says:

    I am so embarrassed of being brazilian, people like this sh*tty president make americans and the rest of the world think that here in Brazil people are all like this assh*les, Shame on me :’(

  7. bledderag says:

    That’s not a nice thing to say about Obama ;)

  8. cretarta says:

    Stupid. Can we stop with the Bush jokes now? He’s gone, please quit reminding us all of the disaster that his presidency was.

  9. Razuka says:

    it is the brazilian president, Lula, on the right

  10. Marina Maciel says:

    Left: ex president (speaker) of the House of Representatives of Brazil (Arnaldo Chinaglia);
    Center: President of Brazil (Luis Ingácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula);
    Lady in the right: Administrative Chief (Dilma Rousseff).

  11. Anniee451 says:

    He’s got some very funny “Bushisms” to his credit; I like them. This was a decent one.

    I do have an honest question for the people who told me that the fact is that presidents supposedly get what they deserve, and Bush supposedly deserved the constant scorn, derision and hate thrown his way – so if I accept that for a moment, can someone tell me what Obama’s ever actually done to deserve the countless prayers/praise/paeans to his name that just keep being made? {Link} to one, but there are the celebrity pledge, the kids singing video(s), and just TONS of this stuff everywhere. To deserve THAT kind of adulation and worship, you’d think that someone had, I dunno, discovered life on freaking Mars and made friends with it, then solved all our energy problems by striking a deal with the martians. Not someone who hasn’t done anything yet. (Well, ok, NOW he has – he doubled the national debt – but this was all going on before that.)

    • Kelto says:

      I don’t think it’s so much what he’s done, but his potential and that he at least tries to be different from other politicians at times. I think that all this praise is just people getting their hopes up. I still have my hopes high for Obama, and it’ll take a bit more than this stimulus package to change my mind. After all, he was the one left holding this sack of grenades when bush left, so I can’t blame him entirely for our situation, and I can’t blame him for not knowing the perfect solution for this problem immediatly since everything everyone has said would work is speculation. I just think he’s going through the motions of exploring our options and seeing how the economy reacts. So I guess, in a nut-shell, I’m not worried because there’s nothing I can really do. (What’s the point in worrying if you can’t do anything about it, right?)

      >.> Me thinks I talked too much this time.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      for a Fiscal conservative, you talk a lot of crap… Who care how the man was ‘treated’? If folk want to laud big ears, their funeral… both bush and obama will die richer than me and neither were/are that fiscally responsible…

    • Danbala says:

      can someone tell me what Obama’s ever actually done to deserve the countless prayers/praise/paeans to his name that just keep being made? {Link} to one, but there are the celebrity pledge, the kids singing video(s), and just TONS of this stuff everywhere
      I really wonder that too. Not that I think a lot of people actually see him as a Messiah, but there does seem to be a lot of people who think very, very highly of him for no, to me, apparent reason. Other than, well, he’s Not Bush(tm) and that is a sort of merit, I guess.
      .
      I am still mildly hopeful that the new administration will have foreign policies that does not make the world a steeply increasingly dangerous place.

      • PortlandMark says:

        I think I’ll be happy if he doesn’t make things worse at this point. With a global economic crisis at hand, I think a certain amount of unnecessary violence is probably unavoidable in the near future. I hope it’s between two countries I don’t care about, but experience suggests we’ll be receiving our share too. (By “we”, of course, I mean the United States primarily, and our European allies secondarily.)

    • PortlandMark says:

      “Well, ok, NOW he has – he doubled the national debt – but this was all going on before that.)”

      WTH? Let’s break down the math: when Obama took office, we had a national debt of roughly 9.8 trillion dollars. The economic stimulus bill just passed and signed into law (with the support of only three republicans) is just shy of .8 trillion dollars. Obama is, so far, about 9 trillion dollars short of doubling our national debt.

      I submit that this is an example of why republicans shouldn’t be allowed near a budget. Not only are they people “who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing”, but they are either too stupid or too partisan to know the difference between “a .08% increase” and “doubled”!

      • rhohro says:

        Eight percent increase, not “.08%.” The rest of what you say is sound, but I
        can’t let decimals go unmoved.

        As for the rest, the accolades heaped on Obama are born of the “not Bush”
        feeling, as others have noted, along with the historic nature of his candidacy
        and his refreshing approach to non-divisiveness, admitting screw-ups, etc.
        Of all of these, the “not Bush” makes the loudest noise. Perhaps you are too
        bogged down by your partisan slant to realize how despised Bush was/is,
        both inside and outside of his country.

        • rhohro says:

          Crap! Second part at Anniee, of course.

        • PortlandMark says:

          “Eight percent increase, not “.08%.” The rest of what you say is sound, but I
          can’t let decimals go unmoved.”

          Crap! I know better than to make that mistake- comes from converting numbers from “math” to “english” I guess. Thanks for the correction.

      • ubr says:

        here’s where you lefties go all crazy… (i’m just poking fun at you now mark…)
        .
        the national debt has not doubled… the national DEFICIT has… we were already at a deficit around $400B and now with another $800B in spending we’re going to be pretty far in the hole…
        .
        and if you want to see why dems shouldn’t be allowed near a budget you only have to look at california’s current mess.
        here’s my analogy:
        if you spent more money than you made in a year would you:
        A: try to pick up a second and third job to cover the deficit
        B: try to cut your spending so that you can afford your lifestyle
        C: ignore the problem until you can no longer afford to drive to work
        .
        the dems picked A
        the repubs picked B
        and together all that happened was C…

        • PortlandMark says:

          Respectfully, (and thank you for acknowledging that the Dems choose the first option), the republicans actually *say* they choose option “b”, but in fact, they only reduce spending on things like school and healthcare for the family, while spending even more on bigger ticket items like a new machinegun for the living room and an armor plated Hummer in the driveway, because you know we can’t trust the neighbors.

          Now, Obama seems to be backing off of option “a” as well, and I assure you, I will *not* be giving him a pass on that!

          • ubr says:

            i’ll give you the point that the current “republicans” do not really honor the
            conservative financial values that they should…
            but in CA the dems have been spending left and right for the last 10 years. they planned the budget based off tax revenue from a financial high water mark and now in a recission we’re doubly screwed. CA is already the highest taxed state in the nation and somehow we’re still short $40B this year…

        • dropping in says:

          This is not all dems fault. It is primarily the insane pp here who want their way, no matter what, but they want it for free too. The do not want to pay a percentage in property taxes, so they set a limit- but wait that screwed the schools, so they (I did not live here then), passed another prop that require a precise percentage of the budget be spent on education, regardless of income- so even if it was an outrageously high amount (as it could be at when things go nuts out here, and they do-all the time). SO the Republicans and/or conservative get props passed to have no reasonable taxes (apparently it is fine that being a non-home owner, non-parent that I pay a large chunk to the education system- which I support, I am just saying it is a little nuts), AND then the dems and/or lib pass props to require spending. Then when things are going well, the dems act like a two yr old in a candy store and freak out and do not think about tomorrow,, and the republicans act like a two year who just got their candy stolen even if it is not true, and refuse to listen to any reasonable balance at all. They both suck- I am super liberal, RATIONAL person who realizes that passed rules costs money- period- most natives and transplants apparently do not realize this. But then no one in Sacramento can think and be rationale, and the freaking media whores on both sides basically screw the reasonable few in the middle- by making sure that if you ARE reasonable and rational in order to move forward and solve problems that you lose your seat next go around. I thank goodness that the republicans are there to reign in the dems- but this budget thing was just belligerent, obstinacy for the sake of ideology- on the rep side. The dems gave a lot. Same thing with the stimulus in the house- the dems gave a lot- but ideology won over rationality and actually giving a crap about your country and constituents…I just do not, in current times see the same belligerent obstinacy regarding ideology over the best interest of everyone coming from dems- maybe it used to and I am too young to have noticed- but the dems did not spend the past 2 years trying ot impeach bush like the reps did for 6 years with Clinton- they MOVED ON. It is not time for post-partisan politics, it is time to simply leave the ideologues in the dust and build a greater nation.

  12. Kelly says:

    lol, yeah, maybe we should start looking outside the country for candidates. people here and none to bright.

  13. Luzia says:

    To those who don’t know… the one in the right is Lula, the brazilian president.

  14. Lolnathan says:

    Durrrrrr Bush iz dum. Hur hur hur.

  15. Mo says:

    I laughed at this one.

    I am a Republican (maybe, lets see how it all goes..) and I wonder how can you NOT make fun of that guy? (As long as it is clean and doesn’t cross a line, which from what I see doesn’t happen very often.) He was a hilarious president!
    I was worried the fun would be over, but now we have Biden. :)

    And I doubt this Bush jokes will stop. They still have a lot of steam to let out, so let them let it out. Otherwise it might get rather violent around here..(haha) And now they have no one to attack.
    I think everyone was sad to see Bush go at that level. ;DD j/k

  16. M. Gross says:

    The guy on the right laughing is Lula da Silva, president of Brazil.

  17. sid says:

    the guy on the right is Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, president of Brazil…

    the other guy I have no idea

  18. Rafael says:

    the guy in left is arlindo chinaglia, brazil´s deputy house ex-president (2007-2008 term) and in right is luis inacio lula da silva, republic´s president. the woman in extreme right (besides lula) is dilma roussef, it´s like a civil house secretary…..just to make fun, she got weapons to fight for communism in brazil in 60´s and 70´s

    also, the democratic party in brazil is right wing and the republican party is left wing XD

  19. PeachyKat says:

    Barack’s president. Enough of the Bushism’s! They’re hilariously embarrassing, but art’s in knowing when to stop!

  20. Augusto says:

    Left: Arlindo Chinaglia, former President of the Brazilian Chamber of the Deputies (our equivalent to your House Speaker)
    Center: Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
    Right: Dilma Rousseff, Minister of the Civil House (our equivalent to your Chief of Staff) and possible presidential candidate in the 2010 Brazilian elections.

  21. fahrrad says:

    Dies ist ein groer Ort. Ich mchte hier noch einmal.

  22. GuesssWho says:

    God, what a moron he is . . .

  23. ubr says:

    seconded…
    .
    what i believe the real point he was trying to make is “why doesn’t everyone make fun of obama they way they lambasted bush?”. and the answer for that is simple and multifaceted…
    1. bush was a moron – easy target
    2. the media likes obama – after bush they’d like a coke snorting nazi as long as he could fix the economy and get us out of iraq.
    3. obama has been in office for less than a month – even bush got a vacation at the start of his presidency.

  24. And thus upon a sea of testicles, my wang is the Good Ship Lolipop inviting all the girls to give a lick.

    Smooth Sailing…

  25. PortlandMark says:

    “3. obama has been in office for less than a month – even bush got a vacation at the start of his presidency.”

    I appreciate the even-handed tone you’re taking with Obama, especially because I have you pegged as a right wing troll ( :) ), but I must correct you: at this point in his presidency, Bush was failing to make the Chinese back down and return our flight crew and plane that had been downed in Chinese airspace. They took the plane apart and used the tech, held our crew for several weeks, and then returned everything after (in my opinion) making the point to Bush that whatever else he did, he should not f@ck with China.

  26. rhorho's ghost says:

    *makes trays of wang-shaped hors d’oeuvres for the gathering crowd*

  27. Oh and I almost forgot…

    *causes an explosion*

  28. eddiepscetti says:

    I’m thinking this is a Girls Only Venue, so I’ll pass, thank you very much.

  29. PortlandMark says:

    [LINK]

    Like this fine donut?

    (donut in question is on the lower left)

  30. rhorho's ghost says:

    *sigh* The girls waiting for the Good Wangship Lollipop are
    going to be fidgety now, with no hors d’oeuvres…

    *escapes on a wang-shaped life boat*

  31. *go down with the ship like a good captain… hates the death by a sea of tea bagging*

  32. rhorho's ghost says:

    *gets safely to shore*

    *sends the Swedish Bikini Team after DWN on a Coast
    Guard rescue boat*

  33. charro says:

    For a monent I thought you were asking if someone would like to go down ON the captain of the ship.. tee hee

  34. ubr says:

    did i miss something here?

  35. rhorho's ghost says:

    The boat?

  36. Jane St.Clair says:

    Do you know the Wang Rule?

  37. *thinks rhorho rocks and switches spirit doll with MegaBob and lets rho go free*

  38. Jane St.Clair says:

    *curls her hair and tapdances*

  39. rhohro says:

    *dances with Jane, now that butt, chest and
    neck feel better*

  40. ACSIS says:

    I know my wang’s rules, but I doubt that’s what you meant.

  41. Jane St.Clair says:

    No, I just didn’t know if ubr knew that to invoke Nazis or Hitler is to invoke DWN’s Wang.

  42. ACSIS says:

    Ok then. Glad I asked before I made that mistake! ;-)
    thanks

  43. Jane St.Clair says:

    Well, I mean, unless that’s what you’re aiming for that is. Won’t hold it against you if you are…

  44. Because we all know that Jane loves the wang…

  45. ACSIS says:

    @Jane
    If I’m aiming for DWN’s wang? No. But even if I were, I think it’s spoken for by UBR and Fester if not hosts of others from what I’ve seen so far.
    .
    Rho might want her slice too.
    (Was that a little too Bobbitt-ish?)

  46. rhorho's ghost says:

    As a verily knighted upholder the Wang, I
    will throttle and otherwise annoy any I deem
    a threat to same.

    *flops face guard back down*

    *grrrr*

  47. ubr says:

    simply by hearing nazi dwn pulls out the wang? o.O
    .
    i’ll keep that in mind in the future…

  48. ubr says:

    well, i have you pegged as a left wing cretin… so…

  49. ubr says:

    btw, the spy plan incident happened in april of 2001… so obama still has another month to sit on his ass…

  50. Between the two of you, I now have both a left and right wing, and can begin construction on my reanimated zombie goose. :twisted:

    I’ll be needing a scalpel and some fishing line. Oh, and those jumper cables.

  51. Uncle Fester says:

    Loud, ignorant, right wing, nut job Sense of humour fail….
    Always gratifying…

  52. rhohro says:

    Yes, how dare the left wing cretin insert facts into your opinion???

  53. mothergoose says:

    Did somebody say Zombie Goose?????? That’s my long lost cousin…smells pretty bad…eats alot of raw meat…

  54. slan agat says:

    Will Capt. Sullenberger be starring in the sequel, then?

  55. He’ll have a lovely wingspan when I’m done with the ….alterations, though!

  56. ubr says:

    and you say i have no sense of humor? i was being sarcastic you dumbass.

  57. ubr says:

    eff off…
    .
    everyone here seems to be left and thinks i’m right… i dislike both sides.
    .
    so, keep your childish comments and opinions to yourself.

  58. Zombie Geese II — The Revenge? Yes, he will have a major role.

  59. rhohro says:

    I made the observation that PM corrected you, so, with lack
    of anything material, you resorted to name calling. I know
    you identify with Libertarians, and have said so recently.

    Way to lash out at everyone, regardless.

    I haven’t expressed a childish opinion here, so, as long as
    you’re falsely accusing, eff off.

  60. ubr says:

    read my comment below…

  61. rhohro says:

    Yes, Obama has plenty of time to be leisurely. It’s not like there’s
    a mess to clean up, or anything.

    Incidentally, it appears that Bush and friends were busy during
    February, 2001:

    “Within weeks” of taking office, the Bush administration begins planning for a post-Saddam Iraqi government. The State Department convenes a series of secret discussions attended by prominent Iraqi expatriates, many with ties to US industries, to plan for a post-Saddam Iraq. The meetings are held in the home of Falah Aljibury, an adviser to OPEC, Goldman Sachs, and Amerada Hess’s oil trading arm. He also served as Ronald Reagan’s backchannel to Saddam Hussein during the 1980s. According to Aljibury, the discussion group, led by Pamela Quanrud, an NSC economics expert, quickly evolves into an “oil group.” The plan they develop is said to represent the views of the oil industry and the State Department. According to the plan, Saddam Hussein would be replaced by some former Baathist general, while the rest of the government would continue to function as before. One of the candidates that is considered to head post-Saddam Iraq is Gen. Nizar Khazrahi (see Between February 2001 and February 2003), who is under house arrest in Denmark awaiting trial for war crimes. “The petroleum industry, the chemical industry, the banking industry—they’d hoped that Iraq would go for a revolution like in the past and government was shut down for two or three days,” Aljibury will later tell reporter Greg Palast. “You have martial law… and say Iraq is being liberated and everybody stay where they are… Everything as is.” [BBC Newsnight, 3/17/2005; Democracy Now!, 3/21/2005; Harper's, 4/2005, pp. 74-76]

    [LINK] to full article

  62. rhohro says:

    Got it. Thanks.

  63. PortlandMark says:

    Sarcastic to me after I said I appreciated your even handed tone, too. Now my little feelings are hurt…

  64. Uncle Fester says:

    Try smilies, you spaniel lick turd…

  65. ubr says:

    the whole article you quoted is based on hearsay evidence… “he said that she said…”

  66. ubr says:

    haha… see, someone can take a joke…

  67. Uncle Fester says:

    I know the BBC are just such gossip mongers… safe to ignore alltogether

    God’s death but you’re stupid…

  68. mothergoose says:

    Could you do something about his teeth?

  69. ubr says:

    that’s why there’s not any actual evidence built in the article she linked to. it quotes some guy as saying that he had a meeting with bush officials and he is the only one to actually confirm that the meetings took place… that’s not good reporting no matter what side of the aisle you’re on….
    .
    yet again, eff off fester, or get some real comments instead of petty insults.

  70. Jane St.Clair says:

    I didn’t think it was gossip if you had an intelligent sounding accent. ;)

  71. Well, I’m planning an upgrade to titanium with serrated edges.

  72. Uncle Fester says:

    There are references to follow up. You know, things that verify what’s stated as ‘fact’…
    Since you seem to be hard of thinking, they’re the grey links at the bottom.
    Only the Harper’s one is dead… there… I’ve held your sweaty little hand long enough…
    And I reserve ‘petty insults’ for the petty minded, since it’s about their comprehension limits… but please, feel free to prove yourself a fool again.

  73. rhohro says:

    Do you truly believe that only one person has ever
    claimed that Iraq was in the cross-hairs from the
    get-go, before 9/11?

  74. PortlandMark says:

    The actual evidence for a lot of this was sealed by the Bush White house, especially the energy policy meetings with Cheney. They wouldn’t even release the names of the people who attended the meeting. With any luck, Obama will unseal these documents and we’ll get the info you need to see to believe the truth. I wouldn’t hold my breath though, Obama’s already talking about “not weakening the office of the president”…

  75. dropping in says:

    He got briefing materials under this cover sheet. “There are memos. One of them marked, secret, says, ‘Plan for post-Saddam Iraq,’” adds Suskind, who says that they discussed an occupation of Iraq in January and February of 2001.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml

    First Bush treasury secretary supplied this document in 2004 to 60 min. Now 60 min has some issues with journalistic integrety re: Bush’s National guard record being VALIDATED (not that they have ever been shown WRONG, but they were shoddy in the process for sure). But this is a document, supplied by an insider.

  76. rhohro says:

    *hands Unc a Purel wipe*

  77. ubr says:

    the article you posted states that Falah Aljibury attended a meeting with bush officials. which is exactly the same thing outlined in the BBC article… (fester, i did read all of them, which you obviously didn’t) no one has ever backed up his statement therefore it’s hearsay… i’m not even coming close to saying that bush did not plan to invade iraq from the beginning, but the “facts” you used do not support that conclusion at all.
    we all know that bush wanted saddam dead for threatening his dad… that’s where it all started…
    .
    NEXT!

  78. ubr says:

    i hope that he does release some of the documents… but until then i have a very hard time believing in the conspiracy theories spawned by these people…
    they remind me too much of michael moore and his brand of truth.

    if you say it loud enough, fast enough, and repeat it enough, it becomes truth…

  79. eddiepscetti says:

    Well, he did invite ‘all the girls’, so by process of elimination, I’ve been uninvited. Actually, so have you, but I’ll bet you can confuse DWN if you shave and slip on a wig.

  80. Uncle Fester says:

    I’ve already used Domestos and a wire brush…

  81. Uncle Fester says:

    BBC, such gossipers… ah well… you’re still a pile of pig dung…

  82. ubr says:

    i’m a pile of pig dung, yet i still smell better than you…

  83. rhohro says:

    @Unc: For some reason, they never seem to
    be able to smell themselves.

    @ubr: The point was to account for activities
    of Bush in February, 2000. If you repudiate
    this, then fine: Bush was asleep at the wheel
    from the get-go.

  84. ubr says:

    bush in february 2000 or 2001?
    .
    and please notice the last couple sentences of my earlier rant. i do not doubt that bush walked in wanting to f— up saddam, but the source you used has never been confirmed and probably will never be confirmed based on the post from mark below…

  85. rhohro says:

    2001, obviously.

    The point I haven’t made is that, as you said
    earlier, Bush took a vacation at this point in
    his first term. He had the luxury of doing so,
    it can easily be argued, that he didn’t have a
    mess with which to contend from Day One.

  86. ubr says:

    please explain as your comment does not make much sense. are you saying that bush did take a vacation? or?

  87. rhorho says:

    The entire conversation began with your 3rd
    assertion, “obama has been in office for less
    than a month – even bush got a vacation at
    the start of his presidency.”

    I’m saying that, if Bush *did* take a vacation
    (as you asserted), it would have only been
    because he had an easier job than Obama
    has now.

    That said, presidential “vacations” are not the
    same as vacations you would take. “Working
    vacations” are not usually much fun.

  88. ACSIS says:

    Rho, instead of ‘vacation’, read, ‘honeymoon period’.
    As in, they left him alone; didn’t try to destroy him …

  89. rhorho says:

    Oh, yes. I had forgotten. Thanks! :mrgreen:

    OT, have you checked your profile lately?

  90. ACSIS says:

    My profile? Me? Um, ok, looking now.
    What am I supposed to be seeing?
    Do you know my profile name? I’ll be interested to know how you figured that out.

  91. Jane St.Clair says:

    So… what you’re saying is that a couple’s honeymoon is when they leave each other alone and don’t try to destroy each other? Good to know.

  92. Uncle Fester says:

    Elementary…
    But please, don’t expect people to show how it’s done…

  93. ACSIS says:

    @Jane
    Um, basically, yeah. That’s how I’ve seen it in pretty much every marriage. Sometimes they get an early start and one tries to throw the other over the falls, but usually they wait until they’re back home for a month or so.
    Why, have you had a different experience?
    ;-)

  94. Jane St.Clair says:

    And for the love of Sifnuta, why won’t my avatar change?! I even deleted this image. *fumes with hatred towards technology*

  95. ACSIS says:

    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, or the firewall apparently.
    .
    What am I supposed to be seeing on my profile?

  96. Jane St.Clair says:

    @ACSIS
    Well since I’ve never been married, therefore never having a honeymoon, I couldn’t tell you. There’s no need for my parents to try and destroy each other, my dad does whatever my mom tells him anyway. ;)

  97. ACSIS says:

    Jane, clear your browser cache. I see just the teapot now.

  98. ACSIS says:

    Smart man your dad. Maybe not a happy man, but smart and alive ;-)

  99. Jane St.Clair says:

    What… how… *should not be allowed on the internet*
    -
    Eh, he’s happy enough, he likes it that way!

  100. rhorho says:

    @ACSIS: Please ignore. I was confoozled.

  101. rhorho says:

    @Jane: Charlie is probably quite obedient,
    but iirc, he’s not to be trusted with “watch the
    pralines” instructions…or was that peanut
    brittle that he burned?

  102. ACSIS says:

    @rho,
    Welllll, ok then…

  103. Jane St.Clair says:

    Walnut butter toffee! His ADD has taken a turn for the worse in his advanced age. I suppose that’s for the best, that means there’s always some new shiny object waiting to be explored!

  104. charro says:

    D’OH!
    *moment

  105. Uncle Fester says:

    He likes the feeling on beard on scrotum…

  106. Your thinking is relevant to my interests… *wears captain hat*

  107. Uncle Fester says:

    That’s not what you told me… you mean I’ve grown this for NOTHING?

  108. Uncle Fester says:

    but it is if it’s the BBC…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up