
Not content to be just a puppet state, Brazilian leaders introduce the “shadow puppet” state.
(Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: heatherjlc
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Barack knew something terrible had happened | I has a sad Next »

Not content to be just a puppet state, Brazilian leaders introduce the “shadow puppet” state.
(Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: heatherjlc
Second to last!!
Bourbon takes its name from Bourbon County in Kentucky, where it was first produced in 1789 by a Baptist minister.
You don’t Say ol’ chap!
That is one good thing Christians have brought, the booze. From the Trappist Monks to this guy, they do like their booze. Of course the American Indians have brought the peyote and other cultures / religions have brought other good mind-altering substances, but nothing says Christian like a good old fashioned drunk.
That jibes with my favorite saying on the subject:
Don’t ever get into a drinking contest with a Baptist.
My experience is that northern Baptists are wimps when it comes to the drink if they drink at all, but Southern Baptists? Hell no, I can’t compete.
Interesting. I’m only familiar with the ways of the Southern ilk,
and have never heard a difference noted, vis a vis drinking.
I like this one:
Why do you take two Baptists with you when you go fishing?
Because if you take only one he’ll drink all of your beer.
It took me a minute to understand that one, probably because that’s not my experience. Now if the second Baptist was female, I’d agree, but if it’s just the guys, they’d drink your beer and the lake water if they thought there was a shot of whiskey at the bottom.
I remember hearing the following said about Episcopalians:
Where ever 3 or 4 are gathered in His name
there is always a 5th.
LOL! at the above jokes too!
Arabs don’t recognize Israel as a state.
Jews don’t recognize Jesus as Messiah.
Southern Baptist don’t recognize one another in bars.
ba – dum *ching*
mmm… belgian triples…
“rho, we have seen that you and lit have a personal tiff going on… so… your judgment on this situation is rather baised…”
Sorry, ubr, but I just now got to this LOL again, and the thread
below is long.
I don’t have a “personal tiff” against Literal, but do have a problem
with unfairness. Other people (not I) deserved to have LOLs on the
front page, but didn’t make it because of what she did, namely,
creating multiple profiles to drum up votes for her LOLs.
How is that fair?
I initially pointed out her “Sardonic” deceit when she decided to
dictate how people should post on LOLs she made. That, coupled
with an unfair attack against me for another perceived offense
(despite my explanation) led me to shed some light on her. If she
hadn’t gone nuts in the first place, I would have kept the Sardonic
stuff to myself.
Since then, she has socked many times and attacked me in many
ways. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll notice three things
about me:
1. I haven’t lied, and have provided proof, wherever possible.
2. I have defended myself, which is my right.
3. I have never post-stalked her, though she has, via multiple
socks, followed me around, in an effort to harass me. (You may
not have recognized all of her socks, but there are tells.)
Most of this doesn’t matter anymore, as she seems to have
simmered down a bit. Some “real” LOLs are getting through now,
so all seems returning to normal. (Okay, saying “normal” in
reference to PK is a stretch…)
As for bias, ubr, you are defending your friend, and that’s fine.
Just don’t call me biased without full disclosure of your own bias,
okay?
You have a paranoid condition, and you should definitely seek help immediately.
Otherwise, you seem to have entirely too much time on you hands.
Wow.
Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean you’re not being followed.
.
Actually Rho (and Froo) seems to be acting on pretty good data. I’m not agreeing or disagreeing with their every word, but it seems they’ve established credibility in this case.
Yet another caption by the apparently ‘brilliant’ heatherjlc (aka literal, literal123), which is down right stupid. Why when I go into voting do most of them have +/- 2 or 3, but hers(?) are already always +10 or more?
I smell a rat. A dead, smelly, stinking multiple email voting rat. Maybe its just me.
It is stupid but it’s funny too. Not great but not terrible.
Actually, this cracked me up when I saw it in voting.
Yeah, I really liked it…
have you seen the rest of the lols that make it up here? at least this one made me laugh…
Subject correctly identified, spelling and grammar ok, and actually funny, too. Win in my book.
There is, though, something amiss with the voting system lately although I doubt Lit’s got anything to do with it; she’s just high-volume on production and quite honestly has some funny ones. But I have noticed recently that even though I check for new stuff to vote on several times a day, there’s ones that I NEVER see (not just mine, but I’ll see something someone else has favorited and I never saw it in voting). Today was (for whatever reason) a pretty high-volume day for me; I did 8 new ones (which, yeah, that’s ridiculous…but a lot of days I don’t do any) and I only saw 2 of them in voting at all, which just seems weird.
What’s not to liked about shadow puppets? Everyone loves a good shadow puppet.
sorry for the lack of playing spirit, but i´m here to say that i´m brazilian, i support lula´s government, i believe the both elections he won were warrantable and even so i think that´s funny.
Your smelling is correct.
(ew@phrasing)
It’s funny…
But not front page funny..
My point is there are a lot of bad up here but for all of the bad ones hers seems to make it to the front page in suspiciously high numbers.
I think she works at pk, knows someone who works at pk or has a minimum of 10 emails adddresses she uses to vote hers to the front (this one).
I know it’s been discussed before and I know she gets livid at the suggestion and I still dont believe her.
the good old conspiracy theory, eh?
She may also be bexareeni, I think.
rho, we have seen that you and lit have a personal tiff going on… so… your judgment on this situation is rather baised…
I think perhaps you need to pay better attention to the company you keep.
socks to me mean nothing really… if someone wants to post as three different people, go for it… who am i to discriminate against schizophrenics?
.
all the accusations that fly around unsubstantiated just look ridiculous after a while…
Posting as three different people isn’t the problem. Posting as three (or more) different people while pretending to be another person altogether in order to harass, name-jack, and generally act like an idiot until avatars arrive to show what’s been going on is another can of worms altogether. Then, when it becomes obvious what’s been going on, deny it all and say you were name-jacked yourself? Please. The problem is not the socks. The problem is the mental deficient that it takes to create a sock and then use it for nefarious purposes and to harass people.
-
Also, creating socks to vote for your own LOLs in order to co-opt the front pages and keep other people with equally good or better LOLs from getting on the front page because you are an attention wh*re and need to be loved…….that’s also a problem. People are getting shut out because someone needs to be in the limelight all the time.
Hey, sweetcheeks, you can make up any email address you want to post here and harass anyone you want and no one would ever know it. You dont’ need a registerd address to harass someone, sexybuns.
See, just an observation.
No sh!t, Sherlock. That’s why I said “Posting as three (or more) different people while pretending to be another person…”
-
Just remember poker players. That’s all I’m sayin’.
Mainly just to piss you off.
Not possible. Most of the rest pf us have bigger fish to fry thatn being insulted by someone being fake on the interent, you know, like the economy and stuff like that.
Oh noes! Someone lied!
Tell you what. Why don’t you go ahead and fry your bigger fish away from PK, and the rest of us will continue on in your absence as though you never existed. Deal?
Why? Don’t you wike me?
‘cuz you know I want you to like me so much that I may just die if you don’t.
I’d just hate to think I was wasting your time by keeping you occupied on a site that you obviously think is beneath you. So toddle along, now. I’ sure the home will refit that helmet for you if you ask nice. Oh, and get them to wipe your nose and change your diaper, too.
But froo! He trolls on the internet! That is an ancient and noble position not to be taken lightly! He’s singlehandedly sticking it to those self-righteousinsiders at PK. His mom must be soooo proud.
Oh, the retard insult. I has a sad now!
If I may retort, takes one to knwo one, hurry so you don’t miss your short bus!
Boo hoo.
Damn. And here I was thinking he was an idiot! How sadly mistaken I must be! Quick, let’s all bow down to him and praise him for the mighty wit he is! At leeast we’ll be half right!!
This is the best laugh I’ve had today.
You should ask yourself this question daily — Y SO SERIOUS?
If the answer is becasue my real life blows donkies you should really go and get one!
Either a donkey or a life, whatever!
Do you think you could pack more derogatory and condescending sexism in your post? I don’t think my entire gender has been insulted enough.
That’s my point! Harass herass!
Oh! I get it. You’re a douchebag. Thanks.
Actually, that’s me, and I don’t post anymore because frankly I don’t think I can handle being ripped on for having conservative leanings. I’ve seen what happens to people who can’t back up their assertions. It makes me pretty nervous, I’m not that well-versed in politics (not like the rest of you guys, but I am learning) so I’d rather just lurk.
Sounds like a good idea, Literal.
This is exactly what I’m talking about. It’s really unfair that you’ve dragged me into your conspiracy theory. I wish you well, and haven’t sayd or done anything mean or nasty to you (if you read over my posts you’ll see that), so I don’t know why you had to go accuusing me of doing wrong. I’m sorry you’re having trouble, but it’s pretty unfair to just acuse everyone who makes a post or puyts up a lol you don’t like of being someone you’re mad at. That is a pretty close-minded way to look at life, don’t you think?
LOL!
I thought it was clever and funny.
I found it funny, and what’s better, neither Democrats nor Republicans can wank to it… I give it an 8.
I recognize that gesture.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I like how the title on the blog is “Not content.” No content to see here, move along now folks
Fail.
Where are the ears? Think of the BUNNIES, people!!!
Very very funny! I love this one!
the other guy is jose dirceu, former civil house boss