
O.M.F.G. Lizzie! Ruffles are soooo 1979!
(Queen Elizabeth II and Ronald Reagan)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: heatherjlc
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous WTF DO YOU MEAN | I can’t walk on water Next »

O.M.F.G. Lizzie! Ruffles are soooo 1979!
(Queen Elizabeth II and Ronald Reagan)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: heatherjlc
What does 1,979 have to do with anything?
1,980th!
A megalopolis (sometimes called a megapolis) is defined as an extensive metropolitan area or a long chain of roughly continuous metropolitan areas. The term was first used in the United States by Jean Gottmann in 1957, to describe the huge metropolitan area along the Eastern seaboard of the U.S. extending from Boston, Massachusetts through New York, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and ending in Washington, D.C. According to Gottmann, it resulted from changes in work and social habits. The concept was later extended to include the following regions: BosWash (Boston–Washington), ChiPitts (Chicago to Pittsburgh), Quebec City–Windsor Corridor, SanSan, and Bajalta California. A megalopolis is also frequently a megacity, megapolitan area, or a metropolitan area with a total population in excess of 10 million people.
Perhaps it’s how many times the author faked a vote to get this thing on the front page?
It’s funny because it’s true!
It’s funny because the votes were stacked by the author and her fan club? The same fan club who repeatedly votes for her “LOLs,” regardless of whether they are funny? The same fan club who enjoys going on witch hunts and attacking other members?
All the above, I think. You’re a small group of lonely, pathetic losers who spend WAY too much time on “cheezefriend” sites.
And which fan club would this be? I see no fan club of the author here, and I for one don’t vote for unfunny, regardless of who makes it.
Ahem. This is a LOL site. You seem to be taking things a bit too seriously. I think you want a BWL, or ‘Bitter Whiny Loser’ site. Like 4chan, for instance.
Better here than on the Friends of the Butthurt site. Are you an Admin there?
…says the lonely, pathetic, friendless loser who spends all of her time
voting on her own LOLs, relying on a “cheezefriend” site to fill the
empty void in her life. You have no fan club, of course.
it is the year 1979 not like a number lol
last!
comments end here
You can tell the difference between a slow worm and a snake as slow worms have moveable eyelids, a notch in their tongue (not a fork), a bullet shaped head which is not wider than their body and can detach their tails if they are attacked.
I think you worded that wrong. It sounds like you’re saying that slow worms have a detachable tail but I would expect that a snake would be the one with the detachable tail. I’m not sure though. It’s just a guess based on reptiles with detachable tails. I’ve also heard that Mickey Mouse has a detachable tail. I’m planning on testing the Mickey theory next time I’m at Disneyland.
All tails are detachable.
Oh, hang on. Was this the kind of detachable where you do not use a cleaver?
I haven’t laughed at this site in a while, thanks….
The variable is how easily they can be detached.
Hell, I heard Mickey’s whole head comes right off, as far as that goes….
Yup… And his tail.
That’s an awesome link….that’s what she said.
Coolness! Fun link!
lorena bobbit proved this to be true…
Heehee! Lorena Bobbit reference FTW!
Now I’m loling!
glad i could brighten your day.
now back to the doldrums of my day job…
With a detachable penis…
O_o…
A no-tail? But how will we get one?
No, if you stand on a slow worm’s tail, it comes off so the slow worm can get away. (Apparently) I don’t think snakes can do that, can they?
No, it is a lizard trait last I checked.
Slow worms are lizards.
Oh, I now realised that your response was probably to the “snakes can’t do that”. :p
Sorry for the misread.
Tis okay, most people think I am some form of stupid.
I’ve been searching for a list of the “Forms of Stupid”…
Heehee! LOL.
There’s the “useful idiot” form.
Link.
I am sure there is a few people here who could think of a list and apply it to me.
Not me….DWN. I love you just the way you are!!
Now you’re just trying to talk me into biting you. OMNOMNOMNOM…
I wouldn’t go that far, but you are American, after all..
More seriously though, I didn’t know whether the “slow worms are lizards” thing was a common knowledge deal, then after posting I remembered about you and that poor komodo, and realised that common knowledge or not, it was probably DWN-knowledge. So again – my bad.
You can has bite nao too. *bites*
Weak Sauce.
I am reminded of a Bill Igvil (probably butchered that last name, he is one of the Blue Collar TV comedians) skit. About the most prolific muscian ever and the commercial to get his music.
“He wasn’t the best musician but he is recognized as the most prolific in music history.”
I think of that vague memory everytime I see another Heather lol.
Engvall, I think.
You, Diss, are correct. He’s the ‘Here’s your sign’ guy. Makes my Dad laugh all the time.
Did your dad watch the Comedy Central roast of Larry the Cable guy?
Ingvall appeared via video tape, and much sport was made of it. If he
missed it, it should be on reruns for a while.
Bill Engvall – 15 Degrees Off Cool…hillariosity!!!!!
I love when he’s telling the story of flying with the Blue Angels (I think it was them). The part where he describes his ears touching makes my husband laugh so hard he has to pause it every time!
Aha! I am enlightened. Thankies Diss and your reward… *bites Diss*
seconded. her lolz are getting worse and worse…
She could be running out of painkillers…as discussed here yesterday.
“This is a tribute to Heather, she was not the brightest or even clever LOL writer but she certainly was the most prolific. Buy the collection and remember the LOL she made after she got out of the shower on Tuesday, then after she took a dump, made a sammich, popped a pimple, voted on her own work, blew an admin, etc etc… All from the same Tuesday… This tribute collection can be yours for… Well, if you come here, you’re gonna see it anyway. Enjoy. No refunds or returns.”
“I’d buy that for a dollar”.
*Robocop reference
“And where can you get these lovely products, you ask? Well that’s the gag. You already have! Put on a happy face!”
Batman reference.
Reagan was an ass who’d laugh at anything! Her majesty probably wasn’t saying anything funny!
I have heard that in private Her Majesty is known for a sly, devastating sense of humor, but I agree that in her public speeches she is usually very serious.
Even in public, under the right circumstances, Elizabeth (and indeed most of the royals) can exercise a bit of wit.
In that frock, even in the 80s, it was one of three things
1) She won a bet by wearing it
2) She lost a bet and had to wear it
3) It’s performance art.
-
And looking at Ronadlo’s face, it looks like something impeachable is happening under that table…
Is he laughing, or passed out in a drunken stupor? I could never tell with Ronnie.
The photo probably WAS taken in 1979 … or close to. Though that dress never would’ve been considered stylish.
since reagen wasn’t president in ’79 i’d find it hard to believe that this pic was taken then… it was probably taken in 1982… [link]
I bet you’re right. Good research!
Good research, poor spelling…
*Reagan
…sorry ubr…;-)
lol. that’s what i get for typing too fast…
Aside from that, do you think Fester would be willing to take Heather out? I’ll bet if we offer doughnuts he would be all over it.
Depends on what you mean by ‘out’… I have a reputation to think of…
Oh, sorry, I didn’t mean to imply a date. Although, the end result could be rather amusing. I meant the OTHER kind of ‘taken out’.
Found it! She was telling a joke, according to the photographer.
Link.
Ye gods and little fishes, that dress/gown is even scarier in the link (with more clear resolution). Oy!
Here’s an evil thought:
Suppose Diana recommended it to her?
That would explain a lot of the hate in later years!
That’s why I said “close enough to” …
But the difference between 1979 and 1983 (when the pic was shot) was the entire Carter presidency…that’s perspective, right there!
Considering Reagan didn’t officially become president until 1981, I doubt that this was taken in 1979.
Oh, I dunno bout that, might have been stylish when she was a kid…
Poor Lizzy. It’s not one of my monarch’s better moments.
Still: points for being able to wear that in public with a straight face.
LOL! Good point!
She’s quite the straight man (no pun, of course…).
Yeah, that dress….wow. She looks like Miss Havisham, for cryin’ out loud!
Good observation!
“Come nearer. Let me look at you. Come close. Look at me. You aren’t afraid of a woman who has never seen the sun since before you were born?”
Hmm… there is a connection with the dress and caption but that’s about it.
Heather, care to explain?
I wouldn’t expect an explanation. I believe if Heather ever graced the comments section with her presence, she would probably get jumped on by everyone.
Yeah, I figured that when I clicked “add comment”. I don’t think she is that unwise.
So, I went and looked at the other submissions and most of them were dreck but a couple were more worthy of front page consideration, imo.
Well since Obama keeps insulting them, she won’t be coming back until the next administration. She didn’t come when Clinton was in. Bush got to make jokes and wink at her, which was pretty funny, since the press reported it as a gaffe
ah, the retard returns on shift… how’s the brush pushing going?
White noise getting too loud, eh?
from you, yes…
Did you know that there are coffee flavored pez?
I need to help you find a new hobby. Not quite sure I am up for seeing a thread of her whining tonight.
that’s because you’re a wuss
ME whining. No mention of Fester’s unprovoked attack. What a hypocrite.
Unprovoked implies that you’ve done nothing in the past to deserve it. And you sure do throw that word around a lot. Are you sure you know what it means?
Yer a hypocrite…
Considering how much I was attacked when Fester came around, I do consider the marsh wallowing you call intellectual honesty to be whining. The only consolation I can offer is that we all did it when he first came at us. However, it was the evolve or die issue that was injected into the debates that actually enhanced the experience.
Now I know this won’t sink in because after all, you are the fetid afterbirth of an intellectual’s drug induced hallucination but I will try this anyway. If you have your facts straight and can actually back what you claim without relying on some petty and contrived method of attempting to make yourself look better than you are, you will find that you aren’t attacked.
Damn, that was too wordy so I will try again to simply. *clears throat* Ahem.
Ready for the magic trick? Don’t bleed stupid and the Fester Shark won’t think you’re tasty.
Pots. Meet kettle. Glass houses. Meet stone.
Are people from Manchester called Mancunians? I’ve heard that they are.
There is NO WAY you read and comprehended what DWN just told you and posted in the time you posted. You obviously don’t want help to survive here.
Survive? Odd choice of words on an internet site. I didn’t say anything untoward; just something Fisty didn’t like. C’est la vie.
Survive in the sense that stupid doesn’t last long here. So it’s not an odd choice of words so much as accurate. Stupid is attacked, actual posting with content, quality, and cites are rewarded here. We have an odd set of rules for a comment site, but considering the content about which we are posting, it makes sense.
I already assumed I wouldn’t find oil with that drill but least I can say I tried and got some venom out while I did so.
The last two lines were terrific, DWN! *mwah!*
Thanks love, though I was rather happy with my bile in the earlier parts.
One of the lines felt lamp-worn, but I’m
biased toward your turkey-talk prose.
Um, yay?
Anniee, seriously: You’re getting a bigger hint (read “on
a silver platter”) than any of the rest of us ever did.
Read DWN’s last two lines again, slowly…
Already replied, rhorho. I made a simple but accurate statement, and out came Fisty. That’s not an example of bleeding stupid, it just didn’t suit him. Tough.
Okay, but do you promise to publicly apologize if
the queen comes to visit, or if Obama visits the
queen? The British tabloids made haste to note that
Obama is fatigued with his schedule, and I’m sure
he will make up for the DVD crap soon.
Grrr! split infinitive fail! *melts*
Obama has already been invited to the palace for tea with the queen. It will be happening “next month”.
[LINK]
Yes, and he has the opportunity to make
amends then. Hopefully, he will bring her
some neato stuff. For some reason, I think
he will.
I knew Anniee wouldn’t offer to apologize
for her bile spewage, so it’s nice of you to
go to the trouble to link the article.
Thank you, Sweetie!
*crickets*
and when in doubt, Madame Mensa, the Macdonalds trash patrol queen, plays the non sequitur card… how very, very trite…
I made a simple comment about the her visits, which happened to be accurate. She came for Reagan, Bush1, stopped during Clinton and came again with Bush2. He even joked around with her. It isn’t bloody likely she’s coming for the next 4 – 8 years, is it? Especially with the administration seeming to TRY to p*ss her off. If she does, well then the prediction will be wrong, won’t it? Until then, I said nothing bloody or stupid for the doggie sharks.
Did you know porcupines float in water, just like small rocks, ducks, wood and witches? Weird, but true.
You’re acting like the last two months haven’t happened; that every day when you post everyone forgets what you posted yesterday and the day before. The attacks are not necessarily unwarranted. Maybe oddly timed, but deserved.
Neither do I forget. Now why don’t all the puppies settle down and let Fisty and me handle this, eh?
Oh, I forgot, I’m a poodle. This coming from someone who accuses others of being in glass houses, throwing rocks, and being hypocritical. I think perhaps you need to look up the definition of that word.
Definition of glass houses and black pots: “wusses, cripples, and nun molesters”, “lesbian zombie daughters” and “scholarly abortion” to name just a few.
Now who the hell let all the dogs out THIS time? FFS nipping at my ankles because…what exactly? I’m not allowed to comment on lols about Reagan and the queen in light of the current administration and her past visiting habits? Whiskey, tango, foxtrot? How about let me and Fister do this FFS instead of butting into it? What in hell is the problem?
Do you think you’re the first little girl to come
around here, wanting Unc all to yourself?
We chase you bimbos out on a regular basis,
Dear, so don’t act like you and he have
important business and that the rest of us
are in the way.
Unc is probably embarrassed for you, as am
I, for one.
Ok, so you’re allowed to bring up past insults, but we’re not allowed to reference past stupids?
-
Please.
-
Here’s the deal. And I’m not sure how to explain it any better tan it’s already been explained to you by others: Fester attacks EVERYONE who makes a dumb post. The key to getting him off your back is to actual come back with factual arguments that dazzle him into submission, or to just avoid those topics altogether to avoid his ire. Otherwise, just expect to be ‘Festered’ when you come in. It has happened to all of us. My particular beef with Fester was about religion. We had a drawn out battle that lasted at least a month before I figured out how to survive. Now, Fester and I tolerate each other, and even listen to one another.
-
THIS is how to survive. The more you rail against the establishment, the more poo you’re going to pull down on yourself. Learn to adapt to the set of rules that have been presented to you as far as nettiquit here on this site (as every site has its own set of rules that evolve and develop over time), and you will be more than accepted as the intelligent poster that you’ve been here and there. Otherwise, learn to accept being called a fool when you are acting like one.
You do realize that I was commenting to Fester when I made the comment about wusses, right? Because it seems as though you are acting as though that comment was directed to you and that would just be stupid when it is easy to follow nesting.
Oh – ohhhhhh f***, Ew! I have to admit, you have a far more sordid mind than I; it didn’t even occur to me that it was like THAT. The moron keeps sniffing around and biting my ass for some bizarre reason – it didn’t occur to me that it made you cream your panties.
So basically I have to ignore his attacks and let you suck his b*lls from behind? I thought it was more like sniffing sh**, honestly, but if that’s the deal, then I guess I’d best ignore him.
I really wouldn’t have thought that of you. Dam.
I’m not really sure who that’s directed to, but I’m assuming you’re taking from my post that to ignore is to not be attacked, when that’s not what I said at all.
No, that was at Rho – I had no idea this was a sexual thrill for the onlookers. Gross.
“Fester attacks EVERYONE who makes a dumb post.”
Uh-huh. Except there was nothing dumb about it. Just a comment about her visits. He didn’t even point OUT anything dumb about it, duh.
“The key to getting him off your back is to actual come back with factual arguments that dazzle him into submission”
Like he did? LOL. He didn’t like it, didn’t point out anything wrong with it, and just does personal attacks and stupidity. Not interested in reasoning with that, ever. I’d be an ass*ole to wish to.
“or to just avoid those topics altogether to avoid his ire”
Yeah, no.
I am not sure if she even knows at this point. I blame myself since my attempt at reason had too much pent up venom from having stayed silent in her threads for too long. Too much message lost in the venom because she didn’t catch any of it, let alone misinterpreted some nesting as well.
You’re projecting again Anniee. We are
embarrassed for you. Now get off my d@mn
leg before I call the pound!
Repeating what I said is lame, rho. Try harder.
You know, that’s your problem DWN – you’re too dam nice and quiet
You don’t do enough clucking in Fister’s wake and allowing that venom to show
It doesn’t matter, I get what you said and what all of you said (after the gratuitous BS of course) but with all due respect, no. Sorry, that’s just how it goes sometimes.
I said it first, but it ricocheted around in your
crazy head, until you thought you said it first.
Anyway, you’re pointless, so have fun with
your imaginary friends Mike and Hypocrite.
So I stated that you should post using logic and facts and you’re saying no….
Alrighty, least it is a conscious choice.
Let’s face, sometimes logic just isn’t part of the equation. Especially if you’re part of the lunatic fringe.
-
BTW, I’m expecting a reply from Hypocrit sometime soon.
I’m going to try this another way, since PK doesn’t like links tonight. Here are two comics illustrating Anniee’s though processes:
h t t p : / / w w w . d i l b e r t . c o m / s t r i p s / c o m i c / 2 0 0 6 – 1 0-27/
ht t p: // w w w . d i l b e r t . c o m / s t r i p s / c o m i c / 2 0 0 6 – 1 0-28/
Of course, remove all of the spaces before you try to go there
*snort*
-
Thanks froo!
Hee!!
Lol, I haven’t read one of these in forever! Thanks for the laugh
Cute!
“So I stated that you should post using logic and facts and you’re saying no….
Alrighty, least it is a conscious choice.”
Nonsense. I *made* a logical comment about the actual caption and picture, and the reply was “Ah, the retard turns on shift.” If you can think of a more logical reply to THAT than that there are coffee-flavored Pez, feel free to f*cking try. Otherwise, get serious about this logic and facts stuff – when talking with human beings who are talking rationally, fine. For that? Not so much.
Anniee, I have seen several people make helpful suggestions but you just keep fobbing them off. Exactly what are you hoping for? It’s almost as if you enjoy the attention.
@ Eds: She does. She craves it. We need to
quit feeding her, and she’ll either go away or
behave. Of course, she won’t admit to the
obvious socks, so she won’t take responsi-
bility for anything she said as a sock.
Same sh!t, new cretin, it seems.
“We need to
quit feeding her”
Make up your MIND already FFS. (Not that I ever expect you to be able to do THAT) but seriously – not a few hours ago it was “You think we’re going to leave you alone when the mighty Fister is engaging you? Hah! We’re so THERE.” Now it’s this. Totally ridiculous.
“I have seen several people make helpful suggestions”
Please tell me that was intentional humor. There’s really no one in h*ll with a functioning brain cell who could make that kind of mistake accidentally.
You have taken a severe detour away from
reality. Do you realize you are misquoting a
post from this very LOL?
Drop the pride and get some help!
Eddie, pay close attention:
I said: “Well since Obama keeps insulting them, she won’t be coming back until the next administration. She didn’t come when Clinton was in. Bush got to make jokes and wink at her, which was pretty funny, since the press reported it as a gaffe
” which was not directed at anyone but was in fact about the picture.
Fisty comes back with, “ah, the retard returns on shift… how’s the brush pushing going?” (Which makes a lot of sense, as brush pushers get to sit on the internet a lot) and
Then came this helpful bit of advice: “you are the fetid afterbirth of an intellectual’s drug induced hallucination”
Pound it directly up your *ss, Eddie.
Link for rhorho!
The insult wasn’t the advice… It was an insult. The advice was afterward. Do make sure to read all of it. I wasn’t stating to suck up to Fester, I was stating that your lack of intellectual honesty sets you up for ridicule. I am all for dissenting views but if you are going to dissent, back it up instead of chest thumping like it actually proves anything.
Quit proving my insults correct and I will stop making them.
Anniee, do you really think that’s what I was referring to? If so, then you obviously only read the comments that are insults directed at you. I wasn’t actually talking about this thread, but all of them collectively.
-
I have read some of the other debates you have had that didn’t involve tossing insults back and forth, and they were quite informative. But, if you want to be the victim, fine, pound it up your ass with hypocrit’s head as the ramming device.
OK, If it was anyone else, I’d be flattered, but a grotesque, under-achieving, mental midget like you is just nasty…
Okay, I’ve been a lurker here for a good while now… and I have to say.
Anniee, I’m a conservative democrat, yes I know my kind are rare, however your views on ALL Of democrats or even Obama are not only ignorant but also the very kind of comments that have been sundering out nation over the last few decades. I, for one, am tired of seeing this partisanship going on and am ready to accept the help of not only Republicans but also Liberals and the i in betweens. You need to be more open, if not then the world is a much darker place.
And give the guy a damn break, he’s only been in office TWO MONTHS! Geez, stop having kittens, it’s not like he’s pressed the red button.
Worse, he trebled the debt in his first two months. These are absolutely unheard of and quite *historic* power grabs, both financially and otherwise constitutionally. There is absolutely cause for everything that has been said. Not to mention the military is *furious* what with the new (and absolutely amoral) caveat written into the budget that veterans injured or harmed in the line of DUTY will have to have private insurers pay for their injuries as well as pay themselves if it comes to that. This is going to wreak deadly havoc on not only the system of insurance and veteran’s care, this is an outrage.
It is really not very smart to p*ss off the military when you’ve a new and unheard of pipsqueak who made it into office on empty slogans.
Okay, here you have it wrong with the military. As a military not only brat but someone who served for nearly two years *I got injured and had to be discharged* and who still has not only connections with very high up officers but also with ensons and the likes I am deeply offended by your statement as I would encourage you to link your words. Show me where it sas that USAA would not pay for something as egregious as that injury as it has been shown and I know first hand that the army has THE BEST insurance around.
And you know what? We’re in the shitter. Big time. Where do you suppose getting us out of it is supposed to happen? Fairy dust? It’s too soon to knwo if the stimulus package is going to work or not. It’s only been a little while. But judging by how the economy is starting to slow its downward turn is a sign that there is renewed confidence. There are even, albeit optimistic, forcasts that state that we might be out of the recession by the end of this year, and my state will be out of it for the most part by the end of September.
Don’t let your party cloud your judgment so powerfully. Why can’t you just allow things to happen, see where they go, have some faith or even, gasp, hope, that things can and will get better. It took a while to get us here, and it will take a lot to get us out.
Alicia, I have a link that states that Obama is MULLING it over (that means he’s thinking about it, Anniee, not that he’s done it). I highly doubt it will pass, or get any further than it has gone simply because of the nature of it.
-
h t t p : / / w w w . b uffal onew s.c om/ 1 8 0 / s t ory/610029.html
-
Of course, take out the spaces before you visit the site.
well then shit, lol, since I’m still on USAA since I was in service and my dad is a vet of twenty years. oh well, my job offers insurance, I’ll just get it from there. Blue Cross Blue Shield baby.
Heck yeah! I love my work insurance
froofrou,
Noble gesture, indeed, providing the link. Shame is there may not be an option but to do away with this benefit given the economy.
Note: Anniee said, and I quote, it’s “written into the budget,” which it is.
She never said it was a done deal.
As to partisanship, is that kind of like the partisanship Obama swore we had to do away with and then two or three days in he sicced the entire media on Rush Limbaugh (a civilian no matter what you think of him) and he’s now blaming Bush for everything that goes on, and wants to hold a show trial? Yeah, I can see that it was very sincere all that talk of doing away with partisanship. It’s pointless to discuss it, though – just ask Keith Olbermann and Janeane Garofalo and Amanda Marcotte and…yeah, pretty much anyone else. That’s hypocrisy, and it only appeared miraculously the day after Obama was elected. It doesn’t wash now, not after the last 8 years. And not with what’s going on now. Shame, but that’s how it goes. Go around spitting right in the face of our boys who’ve gone into harm’s way and things like that tend to happen
Prince Janusz Radziwiłł (Lithuanian: Jonušas Radvila, also known as Janusz the Second, 1612–1655) was a powerful Polish–Lithuanian noble (szlachta) and magnate. He was Court Chamberlain of Lithuania since 1633, Field Lithuanian Hetman and Samogitian starost since 1646, voivode of the Vilnius Voivodeship since 1653, Great Hetman of Lithuania since 1654, starost kamienicki, kazimierski and sejwejski.
Oh…sorry, but really transparent to suddenly show up and side with the dogpack. Cute. But ridiculous.
haha you seem to think that I’m jumping on you when all I’m doing is having a debate with someone. I do this regularly. And I would not have jumped on you had you not made, quite frankly, arrogant remarks. To think that you could say something so completely ostentatious and not get called out on, by more than ONE person, is laughable.
Besides that I do admit you put your side forward in a very articulate way, and as a writer I respect that.
And you conveniently ignore the fact that it was Fester who started it? Seriously?
However, thank you for the compliments; I do appreciate and respect that, no matter what some dopewads say.
FWIW I do it regularly too
Your ill-begotten origins were wusses, cripples, and nun molesters…
Who let the dogs out? Who, who who! Who let the dogs out?
Ah, I am talking to somebody lacking their medication. Anything I say will be lost as less than pretty dots on the screen. Nevermind then.
Good idea!
Least you can admit the crazy, that helps.
Annie451 wrote: “Well since Obama keeps insulting them, she won’t be coming back until the next administration.”
-
To reiterate what froo said, back up your statements with cited FACTS, or spew less retarded drivel, and you won’t be called a retard. It wasn’t an unprovoked attack, you posted some retarded nonsense, and someone called you out. Had you provided a cite for your statement that corroborated your opinion, you wouldn’t have been flamed.
As well, she thinks she’s not to be held responsible for what her sock
puppets say. Yep, another loon pie…
Ok, about the *lol caption* – Well since Obama keeps insulting them, she won’t be coming back until the next administration. She didn’t come when Clinton was in. Bush got to make jokes and wink at her, which was pretty funny, since the press reported it as a gaffe
That is all.
Cretin… underachiving, obesity apologetics… painfully obviously a social conservative until reality blind sided you…how does that sit with being a fundy, fat girl?
In Fantasia, the sorceror’s name was Yensid. Great movie, you should see it sometime.
Also, a word of advice before you keep saying that Bush winked and joked around with her… Do you realize how insulted the Brits were about that? You don’t behave that way to the Queen. It’s just not proper, at all, and to be so loose around Her Majesty is a sign of his lacking of tact.
We all appreciate your efforts, Alicia, and we welcome you to the board. I hope you continue posting, and don’t go back to lurking!!

-
You’re making the cardinal mistake of acting like Anniee is sane at this point. She’s proven herself to be incapable of logic, unable to face the fact that she’s been rude, idiotic, and mean in the past, and unwilling to see that she’s the only common denominator in her own bad relationships. I’d suggest just leaving her alone with her cowardice, but it’s up to you
-
Again, welcome!
Don’t answer for me, asswad. I’m perfectly capable of answering Alicia just fine without help from poodles.
Hivemind, hard at work.
and it doesn’t take long until the troll of the site is on the newcomer. Thank you and how is your evening?
Check the nesting, Alicia.
oops, sorry. damn, the nesting really does fail on here doesn’t it? I apologize. Now I feel sheepish…
Don’t worry about it.
I too hope you find an audience here that does not turn on you for imperfect posts and what they consider unsubstantiated claims.
I’ve witnessed it many times.
My word of caution: never slip.
*shrug* my life has been worse than what a bunch of people on the interenet think of me, so if it happens, it happens, if it doesn’t, it doesn’t. I try to take that approach with life when things such as this are of concern. If it’s not of great concern to my well being or immediate future, to hell with it. ^^
“my life has been worse than what a bunch of people on the interenet think of me”
I do hope everyone is listening. That is one thing we certainly agree on. I mean, seriously. It’s. the. internet. All this “if you want to survive you’ll” get on Fister’s good side and don’t attract his ire! Like I care.
Hmm. I noted the same threat-making mentality myself.
It intrigues me.
Excellent worldview you have there, Alicia.
Hold tightly to that, it’s not easy to remain aloof in a world defined and driven by the perceptions and criticisms of others.
Good on you.
Heh; I did the same thing on the last thread, jumping on someone who wasn’t even on me. It happens with this stupid format.
The yuccas comprise the genus Yucca of 40-50 species of perennials, shrubs, and trees in the agave family Agavaceae, notable for their rosettes of evergreen, tough, sword-shaped leaves and large terminal clusters of white or whitish flowers. They are native to the hot and dry (arid) parts of North America, Central America, South America, and the West Indies.
Thanks. Tired, and irrelevant.
Now tell me something I don’t know.
hypocrisy (plural hypocrisies)
1. The claim, pretense, or false representation of holding beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not actually possess.
Yes, you do indeed define and live up to the term.
Kudos for acknowledging that!
thanks ^^ I do tend to disagree highly with some of things that come up on the site but have been more than happy to just laze around and read all the comments. They make my drama quota so I don’t take it out on customers at my work, haha. Like, for a conservative democrat, I do lean hardcore to the left on some issues, and more towards the right on others. I like the varied opinions here, it’s the same reason why me and my favorite best friend like to argue over politics, cause she’s hardcore right, and in the area we argue, I’m hardcore left.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
And fair warning, since I believe in dolling those out, I am a writer so sometimes my responses can get very wordy and verbose. I’ll try to contain myself, lol.
Have you SEEN the length of some of the posts here? LOL. Feel free to be as verbose as possible, just be prepared to back up your claims
-
It’s nice to have a newcomer who seems to have it all together!
Is that a joke?
I find it amusing that you ripped holy hell out of Alex for imperfect grammar, yet this poster’s atrocious verbiage earns her a “seems to have it all together” because she joined you in denigrating Anniee.
Where is her evidence? Her links? Her attribution?
Yet you take it at face value, and applaud her for it.
Amusing, indeed.
Hello, Mr. Soon-to-be-called-a-Sock. Yep, that’s pretty much the size of it.
If I miss replies, I have already unsubscribed to this post and am off to have some dinner. Will see you around, perhaps
A lie (also called prevarication), is a type of deception in the form of an untruthful statement, especially with the intention to deceive others, often with the further intention to maintain a secret or reputation, protect someone’s feelings or to avoid a punishment. To lie is to state something that one knows to be false or that one has not reasonably ascertained to be true with the intention that it be taken for the truth by oneself or someone else. A liar is a person who is lying, who has previously lied, or who tends by nature to lie repeatedly.
I got that last night. I see nothing wrong with being considered something warm and comfortable that cushions and supports the hardest working and most weight-stressed part of the human body.
Can I be a tie-dyed toe sock? I found them amusing in my childhood.
Although a tightly-woven, sturdy wool sock defines my basic nature more accurately.
Personally, I like the Toe Socks. They are direly uncomfortable to wear, but they’re all cutely rainbow colored and stupid people like them lol.
Anniee says: “Personally, I like the Toe Socks”….”stupid people like them[Toe Socks].”
I think you just about summed it up.
Except it was planned in advance. The queen has a bit of a naughty (if understated and still quite classy) sense of humor herself, she’d known him forever. I didn’t say he did it without it being planned; that would have been crazy.
haha i will admit to that. i have heard of her rather… interesting sense of humor. reminds me of my great grandmother, rest her soul, before she passed. She got very saucy. >>
Yeah, I kind of gathered it was at least in part due to her age – she’s cool, if you ask me.
Grammy used to grab the butt of her caretaker… it was embarrassing if you were there visiting her that day.
Now that’s a lol worthy image. I’m visualizing Maggie Thatcher-type determination in the bun-snatch!
i knew i should have had my cell phone out when it happened! damn.
Indeed! Nothing like a naughty grammy-blackmail vid.
I still don’t see a cite, or facts to back up that statement.
On the other side of the argument, I can point to several sources that show the Queen of England has invited Obama to the palace for tea next month.
If you simply search “Obama to meet queen” on the BBC news site you can find the article. (in case the [LINK] doesn’t work)
Actually to put that correct. The Government has told the Queen to invite Obama over. The Queen (and the rest of the Royal Family) have no official powers in the UK. They can’t even refuse to sign acts of parliament anymore. (If they put on the Bill “I will consider it” – the nearest the Queen gets to refusing a bill, the Government can quite easily steamroller the act through anyway. All of her positions (and the rest of the Royal Family’s) are purely (I can’t think of the bloody word now but try this one!!) powerless in nature. She may be Commander of the various Battallions and Divisions in the UK Army, Navy, Airforce, but she has no power to decide “Bollocks!! Germany is pissing me off again Phillip. Get the Army out we’ll invade”. The Parliament has to do that. So really Queenypoos was told “show willing and invite him”, it’s not a decision she would make by herself.
Ya, those ruffles make her even more unattractive, since women are already ugly enough.