No intention of anything of the sort, poodledog. The link to the news source is on the link I posted, moron. The *point* is that the left is catching on – too bad they didn’t catch on before this abortion they call an administration.

Whoopsie, Obama supporters! Now who was it that said he isn’t doing anything yet? Hehe.

Slan, sweetie, you’re still applying the inapplicable. No, naturally I wouldn’t bother arguing this with you or any Obama fell*tors – it requires distinctions, something you can’t make. Here’s a hint for you: why do you think it was so important to rename the enemy combatants, to use another term for them? Think real hard.

And while you’re thinking, consider the wiretapping on steroids legislation your little tin God has wrapped his hands around – you thought Bush was criminally gathering intel? You ain’t seen nothing yet, sweetie.

Wonder what the Oba-felIat*rs will do with this wiretapping on steroids legislation by their tin God.

Here’s just a tiny hint: why might it have been important to change the term of the enemy combatants *from* “enemy combatants” to something else? Think really hard.

And then about your wiretapping – you ain’t seen nothing yet, sweetie. Read ‘em and weep. Link.

Yes, and there are more than ever thanks to the Thorazine shortage.

Give it up, the patient is dead. Pull the sheet up over the post and move on.

The Geneva Convention requires signatories not only to refrain from torturing, but to prosecute the torturers. Every day we put off war crimes trials, we are further violating the Geneva accords.

Anyone who thinks that charges of war crimes mean you “don’t know about rules of engagement, actual Geneva Convention principals, Nuremberg or tribunals in general, etc.” is not just dangerously ignorant, they’re willfully obtuse.

Oh, and thank you for being Eric-in-STL again. You cut a mighty
handsome profile in your hat, too.

If you think that’s silly, you may want to write a nasty note to John McCain.

[LINK] The Red Cross Torture Report

If you’re going to refuse on principal to bow to foreign royalty, I’m fine with that. If you’re going to curtsty to the floor for one and directly insult the other, especially considering the nature of *which one* got the bow, then we have a real problem indeed.

The level of head-in-the-sand even now with this stuff being so blatant is always kind of surprising. Much as you probably felt when you became sure Bush was a baby-killing Nazi and some of us didn’t demand his head on a platter. And so it goes.

I still don’t know if they are going to be riding dinosaurs with rocket launchers or sending in robots, but I hope they don’t put the robots on the dinosaurs, because that’s just asking for trouble. Kucinich sounded the alarm about the ring some time ago but that big journalist guy (whatever his name is, some guy involved with Watergate back in the day) says the investigation is ongoing.

The war crimes cries are sillier than the assassination squad conspiracy theories; usually discussed by people who don’t know about rules of engagement, actual Geneva Convention principals, Nuremberg or tribunals in general, etc. I just ignore people who fall back on those words like they used to say “Halliburton!” Words have become kind of meaningless with regard to the hard left.

We’ll just have to disagree about what is and isn’t treacherous and anti-constitutional and anti-American, obviously.

Obama’s gaffes cannot hold a candle to Bush’s war crimes and damage to our country.

That said, in terms of LOLs, Obama’s far less of a laughing stock than Bush, but more Obama LOLs are on the way, as the days wear on, and people push memories of Bush away.

Fair point about Obama’s exposure to the nation being longer than his presidential days. Likewise, Bush had exposure screwing up Texas education as governor, and had a national campaign period, too.

OT, I heard a rumor that Bush and Cheney aren’t speaking. ave you heard that one? I remember hearing that Cheney was sorely p!ssed that Bush didn’t pardon Scooter Libbey, but evidently, the bad blood between the two continues. Bush is having a meeting of some sort involving loyal members of his administration. Cheney will not be there. Condi Rice is the only big name in attendance, in fact.

And suddenly lawlessness has become cause for praise – what would have been unthinkable just 3 months ago is really just social justice (Cloward-Piven in action – tie up the courts, the police, and the bureaucracy to destroy private property rights and enact socialism.) Link.

Oh yeah, nothing to see here; it’s all good. Red herrings my ass.

And you can’t “disprove” something that actually happened – such as the visit to the hospital that didn’t occur because no cameras were allowed; and this is already becoming the pattern. I don’t like camera-whore phonies, and that’s how they’ve been behaving.

You and I must be the only ones who ever played that game, Jane. Does that make us old or just special? Specially old?