Trade you. Not a chance.
(Michelle Obama, Carla Bruni Sarkozy, Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Realdef
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous you think he’ll notice | When krispy kreme is threatened Next »
Trade you.
» 309 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Geary on Undercover Loss Bob the eternally un… on Undercover Loss Gutt on 90s Jokes Wyt on 90s Jokes Doveswing on Seems Legit Whatever on And Then There Was One Byt on Aww, Nicknames! Whatever on Undercover Loss Whatever on Undercover Loss Geary on Undercover Loss 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Nope. Not Weird At All.
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
Itz way past
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
I love puppies!
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Lame Pun Otter
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Take That, Schrodinger
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
And Here We Have the Wild Barfing Rainbow Monkeys of Borneo
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Good Day Sunshine!
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
You're Doing It Wrong
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Gives New Meaning to 'Going Commando'
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
The Dude Illustrated With a VHS Tape of "The Big Lebowski"
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Brian Knobbs Totally Looks Like Bebop
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Switcheroo Animal Pocket Knife
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
Good thinking, Barack!
Not really in my opinion.
Amen to that. This screwed up notion that Michelle Obama is hot was wearing thin the first time they pitched it. Once again, I have more respect for Sarkozy. At least he LIKES America, and HIS wife is hot enough to be a model
It’s not the hawt, it’s the lurve!
When you love a woman, she IS supermodel hawt to you. A good partner just gets better and better. It’s awesome!
soooo…. what this LOL is saying is that the French Prez don’t like his wife?
How odd.
I don’t know what you’re thinking, but she’s far and away one of the hottest first ladies we’ve ever had.
Isn’t that like saying “she’s the best of the bottom of the barrel?” Mrs. Bush wasn’t an eyesore, but she was quite a bit older than my preference. Mrs. Obama is much younger, but she’s about as hot as my ass sitting in the snow without any pants on. Hillary pretty much set the standard at the bottom of the barrel, though the first Mrs. Bush had already set it down low. Mrs. Reagan was just too old, but she was quite beautiful in her younger years.
Now, if this pic had been done in reverse, with Anti-American-President asking to trade for Mrs. Sarkozy, that would be much more believable.
No kidding.
And I’m pretty sure you’d have to be homo if you’d trade Bruni (clicky) for o man of a first lady.
I agree completely. Smart, educated, classy, and a good mother. Sure, if you’re looking for a bikinin model, she may not be your gal; but we can’t all date supermodels! For that matter, who would want to marry one?!?
At least somebody sees things my way.
this
*ahem Jackie Kennedy ahem*
Frances Clevelend, Ellen Arthur, Lucy Hayes, Lucretia Garfield, all, to me, have physical beauty at this link.
The all around most beautiful first lady will always be Eleanor Roosevelt.
It’s a personal thing, so I can’t really rationally explain it.
Thanks for the link!
Also noted: there have been some VERY unfortunate hairstyles in the past!
Great link, but those of you think Michelle is man-like check out this link to Lou Henry Hoover.
Out : MO as Black Hillary
In : MO as Black Lou Henry Hoover
hmmmm….
MY GOD!! IT”S MY 6TH GRADE ART TEACHER!!!!
Ouch. There is a lady looking for a make-over! She’s got good balanced features, if you can get past the hairstyle, the bored expression, and that necklace-about-to-choke the-life-out-of-her. But…eek!!
I know, right?
She was a proactive first lady, but obviously make-overs weren’t high on the list of priorities!
She’s not that bad! Yes, her eyebrows could use some plucking but I think she’s more plain than hideous.
Nah, not hideous, just manly. A lot.
When I said make-overs, I meant new hair-do and maybe some lipstick or mascara. And better jewelry. I don’t think she’s un-attractive, just could use just could use a little ‘help’.
Yea she is way hotter then Michele. Being portrayed (and even being) as classy does not necessarily make you hot. Hell I know many women who are classy…they are grand mothers….I wouldn’t say they are hotter then a model (or former model). Classy != Hot
click on my link.
Case closed.
still in that pic she is way better looking than michelle oslamalamadingdong lol
lolsexism
Has anyone noticed that Michelle Obama has an underbite? She’s not that pretty. Stylish, oh yeah…pretty not so much.
it’s not really about how pretty she is or not, the girl has style, and she’s intelligent and interesting. I’d hope your average Decent guy wouldn’t trade that for something slightly prettier.
It’s easy to have style when you have a team dedicated to make you look good…. seriously she has more handlers than Britney spears
You’re kidding, right? She’s a fricken ape.
… she’s had a personal stylist on the payroll for the last 5 years… so… duh.
k srsly you guys style isn’t just about looks either, i’m saying she’s classy, and yes handlers can bring that out in a person but i’d hazard a guess that she had plenty already. and hey, raccoon boy, aren’t you a fricken ape? or are you lower on the evolutionary ladder?
i just think she’s better than your average pillbox-wearing giggling simpering bimbo. And she’s moderately pretty. GAWD
And here you all are calling us sexist without even considering if the hot chick has a brain…she might even be interesting and classy
Oh how we didn’t laugh
Yay… Yet another Obama-pic… I’m over-f*cking-whelmed…
I think I’ve had my fill of pics about how Obama is sucha cool guy who dose amazing things all the time thanks.
…passing over your post the text ‘sushi coal guy’ lept out…and you were right…
…’hairy sexy shtetl’…
You have schizophrenia, don’t you?
…’Say the three magic words and she will reappear’…
Sarkozy isn’t into men Obama!
I don’t think Sarkozy is in to paper bag sex.
Like Carla Bruni is sooo repulsive??? She is HOT!
Seriously. Michelle Obama is a nice looking woman, but come on. Look at Carla Bruni. She’s gorgeous.
yeppers.
Click my link for proof.
who ever wrote this doesn’t know what their talking about Carla she is beautiful…… and you can’t say much about Michelle
Carla is a very attractive woman and Michelle Obama is also, particularly when compared to the frumpy beady eyed librarian who preceeded her.
Amen!
Of course, who doesn’t like a woman who looks a woman?
Let’s all just dump our hot wives and hook up with male-faced, faux intellectual, wannabe revolutionaries.
Hot and lazy — sounds like a real winner.
…yes, but does she take-it-in-the-ass?
Which end is her ass?
…Ooooo-hoooo…aaaaa-haaaa…
…:(
…
…:)
…
…you guys turned-up in both pictures, but I’m looking kinda pale?…
…ENNNNNHH!…whoops!…timesup!…thecorrectansweris “She’s an ‘intellectual’, therefore there is no difference”…thanksforplaying!…
If your wife’s an intellectual, why the hell did she support a guy who’s platform changed between leftist and centrist during the campaign. If your wife is an intellectual, she would of noticed that in the REAL WORLD, statist economics do not aid the lower and middle class, but in fact aid in the creation of monopolies and cartels for the UPPER CLASS. Markets sans government over regulation allows for a level playing field in which the poorest minority could start a business. Capitalism lets people work on their own merits. Nanny state crybabies like your wife assume we’re all stupid and need help from esoteric pseudo-intellectuals who don’t have the balls to let people run their own lives.
Oh, and she should slap you for your typos.
So because you don’t like the Obamas’ politics, you’re gonna call Michelle an ass-face? Wow, you truly are a pathetic ‘human being.’
I notice you don’t call all the lefties pathetic when they call the Bush everything but a white guy….you are not pathetic but you are a hypocrite
Oh, and she should slap you for your typos.
Line 1: whose, not who’s
Line 2: question mark, not period
Line 3: would have, not would of
Line 6: over-regulation, not over regulation
Judge not, etc.
The Sec of State (Conservative Edition ™ ) approves of this.
+1 Internet with +1 irony bonus!
but uh last time i checked mrs bush wasnt in the picture and were comparing carla and michelle, no offense carla is much prettier, infact michelle looks sorta like a frumpy librarian with what shes wearing and how shes pictured here…
This is not about who has the prettier wife, it’s about love. If it was about having a trophy wife, Obama would have replied ‘In our family, we dont treat people like trade objects.’
Not in the context of this lol it isn’t.
Why are those women standing there all hunched over like they are the last picks at the senior dance?
Maybe they are cold?
1) Not hunched-over
2) Maybe they’re trying to look dignified and serious at a dignified and serious event? No matter how they stood, what facial expression they had on, what style of clothing they chose to wear, someone would find fault. Can’t win, can they?
…”You see? Ah’s all dignafahd and swanky”…Michelle Obama Esq.
Yeah, it would be pretty stupid of Barack to trade Michelle “Pie Face” Obama for a gorgeous former fashion model who is heir to a very large Italian tire company fortune. My real question is: Which one of those people in the background is holding Michelle’s trick-or-treat bag?
In my personal opinion, I think that Carla Sarkozy looks a little weird. Don’t ask me why, she just looks that way to me. I personally think that Michelle Obama is the hotter of the two.
I know you can’t really judge someone by what you read about them… but I think perhaps Obama wouldn’t want to trade due to Carla’s personality…
What I’ve read about Carla has given me the impression that she is an ‘Oh no! I broke a fingernail!’ kind of gal. And heaven forbid one might want to have sweaty sex–that could ruin her makeup! Not who I would choose to hang out with, myself, let alone be married to…
…not the kind of woman for a viking gal…
…it would ruin your image…
…Michelle “Pie Face” Obama ha ha…pee pie…
…the spouse of the steward of America…
…wouldn’t he rather be king?…
Funny how someone makes a LOL about Michelle Obama and the really sleazy trolls come out of the woodwork, three times as nasty as just a Barack Obama LOL. I’ve got a feeling that aesthetically speaking our trolls are aptly named, which makes me wonder where they get off insulting Mrs. Obama.
…Sexually Transmitted Leakiness?…
…p.s., don’t bring a knife to a gunfight…
This isn’t a gunfight. And your insults are lame and unfunny. If you’re going to insult me, please give me the courtesy of making them GOOD insults. Otherwise, don’t waste my time. It’s always amusing when the trolls actually think they’re clever.
…oh, oh…I am wounded, sweet fate…blah…I’m going back to doing my taxes…
…( note: analogies stump Eric )…
…no, not really…
…I just didn’t think the analogy applied…
…(what’s with the ellipses?)…
…and you’re still not funny or clever, keep trying…
…noisy…
…leaky…
…dongle…
@E-in-S. Yeah, I’ve noticed the same thing. And IRL, it is rather always the troll-like appearing guys who most severely critique women’s appearance. Often said guys can’t even be bothered with basic hygiene, making for even more hypocrisy.
…shame shame you randy little Frenchman…
Randy little Frenchman says “Maybe just fer one night?”
lmfao, amen!
What the hell is Michelle wearing? Was that her Halloween costume?
…after wowing the whooooooooooole world with the blood spatter pattern on her election night frock ( it would have been really classy if the daughters had worn the same ) she went with a repeat pattern of puckered pink lips for this event…
…skull / cross-bones and moneybags for Fourth of July…
Error: The captions need to be switched.
The same thought came to me when I saw this picture.
Totally sexist, and not the least bit funny.
-1 internet
Well yes. But I think the best defense would to come up with an equally sexist caption on a photo of a guy or 3. I triple-dog dare you!
I agree great link but did you see the picture of Lou Henry Hoover?
If you think Michelle looks like a tranny…at least she has a girl’s name!
LOL!
+
But seriously, she did great things for Belgian refugees.
Oops. Link.
LOL Total nesting fail! How’d that happen
PK had poltergeists, as well as the trolls!
Agreed. We need some chocolate bunny jokes. This just isn’t funny.
go cry over it. its what most men think an dim sure barack thought about women during college especially when stoned.
Is English not your first language? Or second?
I’m not crying over it. Just think it is sexist. And the best defense is a good offense. And telling us females to ‘go cry over it’ is simply your own attempt to avoid thinking about the fact that your own humor is interpreted as offensive–so, go cry over that, dude.
…you’re right…”this is America, not real life”…
If it isn’t offensive, it isn’t funny.
Sexist and funny is at least tolerable. Sexist and stupid is pointless, so why bother?
Why would I cry? I’m not even sad.
Well, I guess I feel sad for you…with that attitude, you probably never get laid, and your dying a virgin when you probably never chose to be celibate does make me feel a *little* sorry for you.
Human being fail
ROFL!
Are you literate at all? Or do you just know three words?
Point of this site fail
You don’t seem to like this caption either, so does that mean you missed the pont of the site, too? Or is your missing of the point supposedly for a more noble cause than mine, namely your rabidly anti-Obama agenda?
Oh yeah, toerag, that’s such a worthwhile, useful and noble cause…
LOL!
Considering this is a non-serious political site, you would think serious debate would be left to the more serious sites and blogs. I’m simply playing along with the nonsensical hilarity of bashing of the ugly first lady, the less-than-intelligent Alaskan governor, a drug addicted Senator’s wife, a drug addicted VP’s daughter, etc.
If you want intelligent, un-sexist, “gender is a social construct” talk, go read AlterNet or CounterPoint.
While you’re here: laugh!
Yeah, she should laugh because you’re so witty and amusing…
I know that I, for one, was rolling on the floor.
Rolling in sugar, waiting to be licked off…
Wait, No, BAD DWN!!! No thinking about women other than as fellow flesh bags without sexual merit. Objectifying is bad! Bad Bad Bad…
;p
@_@
*goes into coma and mutters*
wow, what an elegant example of a clusterf**k
I lol’d but I am a guy and a jerk. However, in an attempt at fair play, I did make a recaption that will hopefully win me back some good graces. Link to my stuff as always.
…oo-ooh say can you seeee…
Oh, it’s sexist now, but it’s fine when Putin gets posted as a “sexy beast”.
It isn’t sexism, it’s a joke. Lighten up, srsly. I do agree that it isn’t all that clever or funny.
The joke itself was sexist but not too bad (rather like the Putin postings previously). The nasty trashing of the women in it according to their appearance (rather than personality, actions or accomplishments/mistakes) goes WAAY over the top, in a way that the Putin posts do not. Go back and see if anyone calls Putin a dog, a ‘ho’, or a hatchet face, and then look at these posts again. I don’t mind some light-hearted sexual objectification, or banter, or teasing. But nastiness like that above takes away the fun for many of us women-folk!
Thanks For Information…
I LOLd
Lucky you!
They each appeal to different standards of beauty and I can see how some guys would go for either of them and some wouldn’t. (IMHO people who kick and fuss about Michelle being ugly are either predisposed to hate her because of who her husband is, or simply exhibiting a preference based on race – which is not to say they’re being racist, only to say that most people are likely to find sexual attraction in people more like themselves.)
I haven’t read enough to pass any sort of judgment on Carla Bruni Sarkozy’s personality, nor have I seen much of how she and her husband interact. But it is refreshingly obvious, after the rather sterile public image of the last first couple, that Barack and Michelle are very much in love. The man works his schedule to miss as few family dinners as possible, he’s openly and comfortably affectionate in public, and she clearly adores him.
There’s more than just appearance going on in turning down the trade, guys.
I agree. And I’d be happy with either (based on looks alone, so not necessarily in reality).
…Wholesome!…you ARE the worthless fat slob in this country’s great future!…
. . . ? Okay. I am overweight so I guess I’ll accept that.
-1 to analyzing, it makes life so much less funny. go find another place to write your long boring comments.
Yeah, because you’re freaking hilarious. /sarcasm
-10 to grammar and capitalization, f***tard.
and punctuation…
Different standards of beauty — yeah, you got that right. I guess Obama digs Klingons.
Why do I have the feeling that you couldn’t even get a Klingon if you tried?
He couldn’t handle the beating they issue out for mating rituals.
While others are into that sort of thing.
O_O
But not me. I didn’t say that meant me.
Considering that I know at least two people with a dungeon, I wouldn’t try to presume what you are or aren’t into.
And I’ve a friend who enjoyed her dungeon phase, so ditto!
Well it isn’t a phase for my friends but I suppose for some it would be, especially switches.
In her case a phase, because she found herself an older guy–an emotional ‘top’ as it were, who will gladly try anything to make her happy. And so a dungeon for two was created in the new marital home…!
Could be interesting for a change of pace, but apparently didn’t last?
No, it seems to be lasting. I got them a felt-lined wooden locking tool chest for their ‘toys’–to help keep out the little relatives, but have said items handy!
And I believe he is open to the idea of a their having friend-visitor to the dungeon on occasion?
…nope, she jus ugly…
QFT
QED
+1 internet!!
…woo-hoo…
Ummm….perhaps I missed the “last first couple” because GWB and Laura were pretty loving towards one another. My husband and I don’t tongue and grope each other in public so I guess by some of the standards around here we’re cold and unaffectionate.
/sarcasm
Having said that, both women are attractive IMO, I think this comment is just another lame-ass, fawning, “The Obamas are, like SO COOL” picture. Wow….haven’t seen that before. *yawn*
It IS just such a fawning picture which makes it quite a fail, pandering to the medias constant, “hey he’s so cool! she’s so sexy!” . What makes it worse is the subjective nature of the caption. As demonstrated above, it seems a relatively equal balance between people agreeing and disagreeing with the caption. Without an obvious truth there is no real punchline
What an unflattering & dull grey outfit Ms Bruni is wearing – deliberately fading into any available background?
She doesn’t need to be a fashion fad since she doesn’t look like RuPaul when he wakes up.
The hottest women need the least attention paid to their clothes.
Michelle Obama seems too big even for Obama. Not saying that Michelle is fat, just that she has a big figure while Obama is very skinny.
As a skinny kid, I gravitated to curves…
having said that… gimme both and a large bottle of baby oil…
and a 12 by 12 sheet of 8 mil plastic, a pair of water wings, a snorkle, a goat, a two pound container of gummy worms, roller skates, several silk neckties, some quick lime, a shovel, a pick ax, a cigar, and a lawn chair.
Oooo! I’m bringing my lawn chair too! Gotta watch this…Go Sol!
Wow, that’s disturbing. I mean, a lawn chair? Freak.
(just kidding)
I’m *not* kidding! Leave lawn chairs aloooooooone!
Lawn chairs are easy to clean..
*does best to resist saying “Like your mom”*
are you 12?
Why, does your mom like 12 year olds?
No but I am a twit if that helps clear anything up.
Both liked to be hosed down.
captions have to be totally inverted, not saying michelle’s not hot, she’s a little up above the average, now Carla… c’mon, she’s a freaking model, if you dont think she’s hotter I think you may need to see an ophthalmologist
Feh! The idea that ‘model’='hot’ simply means you’re incapable of original thought.
Ever considered going for a Darwin? Your loss is out species gain…
Sol fist bumps Fester – say isn’t your avatar from a radical cartoon I used to read back in the whenever the hell it was? There was also a milkman who was more than a little disturbing. Please help me with a name or a hint that I can use to search out that gasp from my past.
“Red Meat” — from the secret files of Max Cannon
That’s it! Thanks.
wow…. I’d forgotten about that strip. There’s a reason it’s only in free papers.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz………..
Model does equal hot… hence her BEING A MODEL.
Plus, if Michelle is above average you have a low standard for women.
I have yet to find near starved women with the skeletal grace of a deprived ten year old boy attractive. Nor do I find the fashion designs of gay men tossed onto waifish women appealing. For the mentally destitute, I am referring to those model creatures and the ghouls that spawned them. I haven’t seen much in the way of models in too many years that could do anything for me besides give a nasty contusion from all the bones jutting out.
However, I can admit that I am a pathetic little rube but I do prefer curves. That said, Michelle doesn’t do it for me either. I like more T&A on women and she seems a bit thin for me too. I’m not much for her smile either. However, I do find her pretty just not sexy.
Model means having a skinny elongated body on which designer clothing will hang well. Preferably with a face which serves as a good ‘canvas’ for differing styles of makeup. If you had ever seen a professional model in normal clothes, without makeup on, you would know this.
Thanks For Your Information…
Just ew. Reverse the captions and it might work.
Still, no. The male chauvinism doesn’t work, no matter how hard the effort.
Why is it that one of the first ways most people show their disagreement with a female public figure is to insult her looks (or in the case of the creator of the lol, show support by exaggerating looks). Why are females so easy to reduce to nothing more than surface wrapping? It annoys me.
cause its what women have put up with for years and years and continue to prepetuate in the current male-centric world (especially in politics) and giving into the horrible examples of women in popular culture.
I will agree that women certainly contribute to the problem–probably half, at least. But the language in your entry implies that it is entirely the fault of women. On that, I do not agree.
Run-on sentence troll runs on.
I assume you attacked the Sarah Palin misogyny with the same ferocity, right? Right?
I remember a lot more people criticizing her for screwing up interviews and destroying McCain’s campaign than people criticizing her for her looks, except of course for the ridiculous wardrobe nonsense. Sorry, you failed.
I’m guessing you’d fail a “Sarah Palin or Tina Fey?” quiz. But by all means, puff yourself up, dig up that last shred of decency, and pretend you kept it all above the belt.
I guess it’s true what they say — you can’t shame the shameless. You fail at humanity.
My decency has been shredded? WTF happened to it? And Dhoti, you have proven on here again and again just what shameless really means.
And humanity sucks. Failing at humanity is my win.
I’m constantly amazed that someone who is as clueless as Dhoti managed to string together a coherent sentence. I sometimes wonder if he means for the words to come out of his mouth that way, or did they all just fall out randomly.
I think he’s a primate sitting at the keyboard beating the odds and randomly typing out words by chance.
So he’s one of Shakespeare’s Monkeys? Can he drive the Heart of Gold?
I should introduce you to my cousins in Denmark!
Fact-based reality FAIL
Gotta agree with Eric – the criticism of Sarah Palin was overwhelmingly devoted to her politics, brain power (or lack thereof) and knowledge of current events, or what newspapers she had or had not been reading. Don’t recall sniping about her looks, other than how she looked in the fabulous wardrobe the RNC bought for her. Dahlink! You look MAHvelous!
Wow. Selective memory…win?
To be honest, even some of the more liberal personalities I listened or talked to had nothing but good things to say about her looks. I think maybe you’re the one with the selective memory.
There was nothing bad to say about her looks. She is a good looking woman, period. What’s to trash, looks-wise?
If it didn’t happen within the last five minutes, Dhoti can’t remember it. Also, if it doesn’t suit his purposes, Dhoti can’t remember it.
-
I think Dhoti needs some ginkgo.
I think Dhoti needs to ginkgo away.
But of course! Oh, wait…
Oh, both of you are so clever! You remember all the conversations we’ve had where I personally have reduced Sarah Palin to her looks and now can call me on the fact and imply that I’m only offended because it’s Michelle Obama. Wait a minute, I’ve never had a conversation about Sarah Palin with either of you, nor have I mentioned her much since the election. If you were around during the election you would know that I mainly critiqued her political position on certain issues and the only comments about her looks were from guys and that they were usually favorable. That means you are both lumping me in with some stereotypical notion you have of a “liberal” and are in fact, talking out of your asses as normal.
I don’t suppose you could find a few example of that enlightened discourse, could you?
No, I don’t. You’re the one who accused me of treating Sarah Palin as a sex object. You prove it or admit your making sh*t up as usual.
Um, no. You were the one who mentioned your purported comment history (conveniently buried many months in the archives), and when asked about it, you start whining and moaning about making stuff up, as though you have something to hide and want to deflect attention away from your baseless claims. Does that sound about right?
No matter how many times this is explained to you, you seem to be too dense to figure it out, so I’ll try again, in small words — YOU claim something, YOU prove it. Post some links. Can you do that?
No, idiot, you responded to MY comment about the treatment of female public figures with a remark implying that I somehow mistreated Sarah Palin. By your own assertion, if YOU accuse me of it, YOU have to prove it.
So that’s a no, you don’t have a link?
Yes, she is using just as much hard evidence as you are. Is it that hard to back up your words since she is the accused and thus you need to present evidence as to why she is guilty?
Okay, let me slow this down for you since you seem to be suffering from traumatic brain injury. Here is where you felt the need to inject yourself into my statement:
You are the one who made a baseless claim FIRST so the burden of proof is on you to prove that I DIDN’T defend Sarah Palin. You can’t throw around accusations without anything backing it up and then expect me to defend myself with proof. Well you can, but you further prove yourself to have the debating skills of a chimp on xanax.
Read the thread again, carefully. I asked her a question. She responded with a defense, then refuses to prove it. Yes, I understand that willful ignorance is standard practice around here, but that’s just lazy.
Jane, I think you might have missed the day in grammar school when they explained what a question is. (See that question mark at the end? That makes it a question, hon.) You might want to think about that before blathering on about your mad rhetorical skillz.
Since you used the word “rhetorical” then I assume you know what it means. As in, the question you asked me was a rhetorical one. It was a thinly vieled accusation and you know it. You’re only trying to back track now because you look like an ass.
You realize that the word “rhetorical” has multiple meanings, right? No backtracking — don’t get all butthurt because you got called on your bullshit. (But I’m sure that’s what you’ll accuse me of next, because that seems to be your only M.O.)
And still no link, I see.
@Dhoti: Could you be a bigger ass?
That was a rhetorical question, so, by your standards, it’s up to you to prove that you’re not.
Oh, and don’t be lazy, now…
The fact of the matter is, I do have a link to a post I wrote about how it would be a bad idea for the democrats to attack her on anything other than her policy positions. I refuse to post it now. I’ll be damned if I let someone accuse me of something and then having to “prove” that his accusations are baseless. He is only asking me for proof because nothing I have said since he’s been posting has implied that I think it’s okay to treat Sarah Palin as a sex object and he knows it, that’s why he accused me of doing it in the past when he wasn’t around.
Oh, now you’re going to play the long-suffering soul, Jane? Too cute!
So instead of actually backing yourself up, you are going to tell people to shut up and then whine some more.
And some people actually wonder what is wrong with this country…
Yes, I’m obviously suffering for something because I keep arguing with you when it’s clear that you live in some dream land where it’s reasonable to accuse something of actions that you don’t even know for sure that they did and then claim that they have to prove that they didn’t when they call you on it. I’m done with this conversation because there are no winners and losers when I argue with small minded assholes.
Sarcasm? Internet? Really?
See ya, Jane. Be sure to bookmark that link now!
Nice, Dhoti. And yet I’m the one with no decency or shame.
Were you in AV Club? Because you’re quite the projectionist.
Eric, you owe me a sham-wipe! I just showered my screen!
I would, but Shamwow guy is in jail.
Bummer. Maybe I can make do with one of those wearable-blanket things?
Rhetorical has about four meanings in this link. I guess that’s multiple in that it is more than one. Still sounds like someone is being dodgy, though….
*tries to act mystified*
Whoever could that be???
*giggles*
…fcsking get another biology…fcsking amoeba…
…ad infinitum…
While I think she’s ugly, I wasn’t talking about her looks. I’m more disgusted by what people are and what they’re about than their looks could ever make me. So, no.
I’m sorry if I’m unwilling to give the benefit of the doubt to someone who has called her a “gorilla” before.
Yes, it would be dumb either way. So who the hell voted for it?
Thought with all your concern about war criminal Bush and his ‘torture’ and how very very concerned you all are about all that illegal wiretapping and such, that you would be very very interested in this one. Link.
uhm, I think you meant to switch the captions, as Carla is actually *attractive*, where Michelle is not. not in the slightest.
At least someone eyes work.
Wow, that sure brought the sexist trolls out of the woodwork, didn’t it.
I’m guessing that whoever wrote this caption knows that Sarkozy is on his third marriage – and was criticized for divorcing his second wife, then pursuing and marrying Carla Bruni, all while he was supposed to be busy being President of France. And Bruni herself has said she gets bored with monogamy; though this is her first marriage, she has a string of relationships behind her. If there’s a presidential couple out there who might be interested in a little swingin’, these are likely to be the ones.
Yeah, that was pretty much the basis of it. I should’ve realized that it would be reduced to a “OMG Carla’s prettier than Michelle” debate.
Hey, its not his fault his wife is hot and the President couldn’t find anyone more attractive than a 5 in his radical circles.
Bitter troll is bitter.
A haiku:
Socialism bad
This is just a funny site
Take a pill and laugh
Thank you.
Butt-hurt troll whining
Stands in poorly for humor
Try harder next time.
PK is a blast.
Til butt hurt trolls hurl head butts.
The fat lady sang?
…Magilla Gorilla for
Sale…
Perhaps, just PERHAPS, looks aren’t everything.
Maybe she is a 5 physically, but did you ever think that they might just share a deep emotional and psychological connection that makes their relationship more meaningful than just how pretty they look together in a photograph?
A model with a 10 body will be a 5 in just a few short years and a couple of kids, and then you find yourself married to someone you don’t care about, who is no longer attractive to you, and who can’t even form complete sentences or carry on an intellectual conversation. Yeah, marry for looks. That sounds like a great plan.
I prefer to marry for the dirty girl inside the lovely frame with a wit to keep me in line.
But yes, I concur with your assessment.
You’re assuming models would venture into his mom’s basement.
Eh – probably the pretty social worker who comes on Thursdays with the medications …
You want to know what happens to some models when they’re done modeling?
Go watch The Biggest Loser. Two of the contestants are former models. Looks aren’t everything, and they don’t always last. (Sometimes they do, but that seems to be the exception more than the rule.)
So when is this site changing it’s name to “Fellate The Obamas On A Daily Basis?”
And where is this male centric world, exactly? In a male centric world, I’d be able to hire hookers legally anywhere any time I wanted. Oh, wait, you meant *rich* male *politician* centric world.
Michelle Obama is ugly & Carla Bruni is a ugly Ho …
Hmmm…
*Considers what the trolls have been whining about*
Yeah, the captions should be on different people:
Carla : Trade you?
Michelle : Not a chance.
Lets start a thread reducing ugly male politicians to looks alone…
I actually made a lol of that, too, back on Friday, I think.
http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=3908356
Ah! Think alike great mind do/ seldom differ do fools….take your pick…
Thanks!
Now that is a win, AC!
Added one of my own.
I clicked on your name and couldn’t find it.
I did, however, LOVE your laxative one.
Damn, it should have been posted by now and I am glad you liked the laxative one.
It was perfect for the facial expressions and body positioning. I’m sad it didn’t make it up. We do seem to have a rash of unfunny lols, this one being an example, I don’t even really get it. I mean, I voted for the guy and I’m getting sick of the “Obama Iz Teh Awsum” lols. Especially since it brings out the hater trolls who think intelligent commentary is to say something along the lines of OMG MICHELLE IS SO UGLY AND GROSS YUCKY!!11!!1!!ELEVENTY!
Oh and I liked Awkward too!
That is one of my personal favorites. As for the laxatives, I always loved the laxative commercials and figured that would be my one since a lot of people have their own versions.
You are right, I am very tired of the Obama is awesome lolz, they bring out idiots and I have never been much for pumping somebody’s ego.
Check out Diss’ new one, what a politilol should be!
Hm – comment didn’t appear. O/T Just in case, since people were so very concerned with that horrific illegal wiretapping under Bush, I’m sure they’ll be doubly concerned over THIS – link.
link For all those who were so concerned over Bush’s illegal wiretapping. I bet this will really make you mad *cough*
Carla Bruni is HAWT
I´d invade France just for her (enter love smiley here).
=
-
=
Link to wordpress smiley codes.
The unfortunate thing about Michelle Obama is that there’s no hiding her personality and the way she views the world, even when she’s trying to smile. Or maybe that’s a fortunate thing.
And what exactly IS her personality, and how DOES she view the world?
Or were you just using vague insinuations to insult someone without actually coming up with any ideas of your own?
Phooey, aint it obvious Steve?!! Just look at that insincere grimace of a “smile” as she plots her nefarious socialbamalist takeover of the free woild.
American narcisism! Hahahha
ROFL!
=
+ 5 INTERNETS!
totally should go the other way around.
michelle obama is average at best
Well now, Patrick! Thanks for weighing in there with your unique, well-reasoned opinion! Sheds light on the issue! Clears up the whole debate!
this doesn’t make sense michelle obama isn’t even that pretty and carla bruni is a gorgeous supermodel. why would nicolas sarkozy want to trade with barack obama??
Carla Bruni is gorgeous. After all, she is Italian (nationalized french).
Michelle is pretty generic.
I don’t get this one. Michelle Obama isn’t a dog, but Carla is a 10. If Sarkozy traded Carla away he’d have to turn in his man card along with her.
Sometimes a man wants a 10 in another department besides looks. Being a 10 in appearance says nothing of what her score might be in a more desired department.
Not passing judgement on either because Michelle is not my type and I don’t have confidence in models so neither appeal to me for more than half a second.
I think from what the creator of the lol said further up it has something to do with Sarkozy being a horn dog. Regardless, we all seem to agree it’s pretty stupid. Some people just seem to feel the need to compound the stupid by throwing more stupid in on top of it.
Well to further complicate things, according to my poly friends, swapping isn’t about trading up or down. It is about the experience. The concept of trading up or down reduces the people involved to objects, not developed sexual beings you can actually learn from.
I think too many people are taking this lol at face value and thus reducing both women to a quirk of genetics (color, face, and body type) and a commodity. However, if this is played to the idea of Sarkozy being a horndog, then the commodity aspect is probably dominant. However, I am speaking up because I find the reduction of both women to a banal appearance score to be rather insulting to both of them.
Women are more than their appearance, they have dirty minds too, dammit.
However, I said however way too damn much.
No actually in this case, I think you said just sufficient.
*hug*
Note to the other gentlemen on the site: guys who respect gals for more than just their appearance get more hugs–and for those guys limited in IQ, hugs from women means boobie contact!!
You’re my kind of viking, gal.
YAY, contact!
That was the point I was getting to earlier when the Goat Lover ™ was all, “I bet you didn’t care when it was Sarah Palin and you better prove it to me or else. Nanner nanner boo boo” Or something along those lines.
Well now you know how fully I have your back on this matter.
Rawr, I sure hope so.
Careful or I will objectify the hell outta you.
I wonder if she’s been objectified by two men at the same time before.
Something tells me Jane can manage a trois …
Of course, she is from Military stock. Being tough is in her genes.
But she still purrs like a quatre …
And she speaks on behalf of the People.
… Of thee I cinq.
This is possibly the most flattering thread I’ve ever read about me!
NOMNOMNOMNOM…
Good question.
To the darling naysayers who don’t think there’s any lulz to be mined out of Obama yet, I present you with how it’s done. Not meanspirited, not hateful, true, and funny as hell.
THAT is how it’s done, folks. Of course you could use his insistence, now that he’s in the White House and not campaigning, on continuing to negate habeus corpus. Or you could use this new wiretapping on steroids bill he’s managed to finagle which makes the entire internet his playground (including your email) and can be shut down on his whim, or you could go the route like the link above. It’s all good.
I know, right? Why wouldn’t he want to trade the more attractive lady for the less attractive one?
Michelle Obama looks like an pmsing ape with a wig on.
First of all french women bite, maybe he wants Obama to suffer
Seriously, Michelle is fugly.
why would he want to trade a fine, beautiful woman and have odrama’s wife, a man dressed up in woman’s clothing?
Since when in Michelle Obama’s life did any modeling agency seek her out as a model that they would die for???? With the walk of a football player and the mouth of a bulldog, other than extreme photo shop work how would you ever cover up major modeling flaws present in Michelle Obama??? Truth is the left wing gay liberal media has decided to pull a major illusion on the American public. If you write enough dazzling stories about Michelle and photo shop her to the max, you can convince the American public that she really is beautiful.
just the sheep
Captions are backwards.
so…the joke is that obama is blind, right?
For the sake of my own sanity, I’m going to assume the LOLfactor here is that there is someone that believes BO’s wife is actually better looking than Carla Bruni Sarkozy.
There is no LOL here. Only blind worship to the Obama cult.
thats a joke——–right
RE-CAPTION:
Sarkozy- “Trade you”
Obama- “Done and done”