Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Who knew one Texan


caroline kennedy barack obama

Who knew one Texan could chew that much gum?

(Caroline Kennedy and Barack Obama in the Oval Office)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: smarti22

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 87 comments

  1. what says:

    LOL FIRST OMG LOL!!!

    • eddiepscetti says:

      The Nullarbor Plain is part of the area of flat, almost treeless, arid or semi-arid country immediately north of the Great Australian Bight. The word Nullarbor is derived from the Latin nullus for ‘nothing’ or ‘no one’ and arbor for ‘tree’, and is pronounced “NULL-uh-bore” (IPA: /ˈnʌləbɔr/). It is the world’s largest single piece of limestone, and occupies an area of about 200,000 km² (77,200 square miles). At its widest point, it stretches about 1,200 km from east to west between South Australia (SA) and Western Australia (WA).

  2. eddiepscetti says:

    LOL! Ok, that’s funny..

  3. Dhoti says:

    “Um, so, ya know, I, um, kinda want, ya know, an ambassadorship? And, um, ya know, how about that?”

  4. Bob Saget says:

    well he was in there for 8 years.

  5. Steve says:

    Ummm – there was a much more obvious former President to joke about with this one.

    How about – “Now how did that fat chick fit underneath here?”

  6. smarti22 says:

    Wooohooo! Third time on the front page! Hooray for me!

  7. jdagirl says:

    kinda cool for me, this desk was the desk in the shot of Caroline Kennedy’s father in office, working at it, while John Jr is peeking out of little cabinet at the front of the desk. It’s a nice shot and this brings back that nice memory of a picture. wow puking by looking at a picture. dude. you got the oversensatives.

    • ubr says:

      i least i have spell check…
      .
      and talk about oversensitive… you just got all mushy because there is a kennedy near the same desk that jfk sat behind…

  8. Tianashen says:

    This one is clever :)

  9. karma says:

    BUSH IS NOT A TEXAN. He was born in New Haven, Connecticut!

    WE DO NOT CLAIM THAT IDIOT.

    • bad fairie says:

      can’t say as i blame you one bit ;)

    • PeachyKat says:

      Hey! I’m not saying we’re proud of him as a prez, but you can become Texan by moving down and absorbing personalities, traditions and habits; Bush was a horrid prez, but he was a decent man. :]

    • solnesther says:

      No, he’s a Texan who happened to have been born in Connecticut. If he had stayed in Ct., you wouldn’t be saddled with him. On the other hand if he had stayed in Ct. he would have been smarter, more civilized, and less conservative (less Texan).

      • slan agat says:

        If he had stayed here he might not have been smarter or less conservative, but he for damn sure wouldn’t have been elected to ANYTHING.

    • PortlandMark says:

      Isn’t it weird how you never meet anyone who voted for W in 2004 any more? Everyone’s all “Well, I’m more of a conservative than a republican; I never voted for Bush…” My own, unscientific straw poll seems to indicate the Dems were right: Bush *DID* steal the election in 2004! :^)

      • bad fairie says:

        have you ever researched the connection between the bush family and the company that makes the voting machines? might as well be kissing cousins they’re so tight.

      • eddiepscetti says:

        PM, I have noted this in the past, but yes, I voted for Bush in ’04. I just couldn’t bring myself to vote for Kerry.

        • froofrou says:

          I too voted for Bush, and was greatly disappointed from about ’05 on. I had hopes up until then.

          • eddiepscetti says:

            Agreed.. I wish all of the extreme right-wing ‘Republicans’ would form their own party so we can have ours back.

            • froofrou says:

              Extreme right wing doesn’t bother me as bad as two faced Benedict Arnolds who say one thing to get elected and then immediately forget what they said. At least the extreme right wing has a definite platform to stand on, whether you completely agree with it or not. The shambles we have now are the problem.
              -
              The main problem with the conservatives of today is that they have no credibility, and it’s their fault. They preach about smaller government, lower taxes, less spending, and responsibility, and then when they get to Washington they turn into the tax-and-spend Republicans that we have today. All for a little job security. If we had term limits, it would be less of a problem, considering that it’s possible that the next term could “fix” what the previous term did.

            • Dhoti says:

              What’s ironic is that I’m sure you consider them to be the bigots.

              • eddiepscetti says:

                Did I say that? No, Dhoti I didn’t. Do you always have to be such a twat?

                • Dhoti says:

                  No, of course not…because “extreme right-wing” isn’t code for “non-littoral residencies” or “socially unacceptable religious membership” or anything else non-PC…

                  If you don’t like the truth, either (a) you just haven’t fully internalized it or (b) you need to reflect on just why that is.

                  • froofrou says:

                    “Extreme right-wing” could just be “code” for “more right wing than I”. In Eddie’s case, he’s a little more moderate, so it stands to reason that extreme right-wing would be quite a bit further away from him than it would be from me. Of course, you’re bumped up so close to extreme right-wing that you can’t look at it without it’s eyes seeming to meld into either one or three, depending on your focus.
                    -
                    What truth has Eddie not managed to grasp? He wasn’t using “extreme right-wing” as a curse word, after all.
                    -
                    You’re acting as though you’re the only one with a valid opinion here.

                    • Dhoti says:

                      You, on the other hand, are most definitely using it as a curse word. It’s actually pretty funny that you’d make that point after spending a paragraph spouting it off as an invective.

                      Please, tell me how I’m extreme right-wing. And no fair falling back on emotional arguments: “they’re mean, and you’re mean, so therefore you’re them” is a tautology. Positions only.

                      • froofrou says:

                        Where did I use it as a curse word? I simply explained the difference in your perspective and Eddie’s.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          In the first paragraph of your 4:28 post. “Bumped up so close to ‘peaceful coexistence and benign tolerance’…” doesn’t have quite the same ring to it, does it? It’s pretty clear.

                          Again, how am I extreme right-wing? Or almost-but-not-quite-but-right-up-against-the-edge extreme right-wing?

                        • froofrou says:

                          Dhoti says:
                          March 4, 2009 at 12:19 pm

                          Believe me, we’re not on the same side, RINO.

                          And you’re inferring that I wanted to say “Bumped up so close to ‘peaceful coexistence and benign tolerance’…” That’s a false assumption on your part, and wrong. Being too close to anything is a bad thing, even cake.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          Didn’t I already say “positions only”? That’s not a position. That’s merely you declaring anyone to your right to be extreme right-wing…which you’ve made clear in the tone of your past comments that you marginalize and disdain. That’s why I said “positions only”.

                          You’re missing the point — that phrase doesn’t work with “bumped up so close to [insert positive thing here]“. It only makes sense when written with a smear.

                          Look, I don’t know what to tell you — it couldn’t be any clearer.

                        • froofrou says:

                          “Bumped up so close to a small cute little puppy that you smell his puppy breath” works just fine, unless your brain is simply geared to only speak slander. I do not use “extreme right-wing” as a smear any more than I do “extreme left-wing”. I may use it as a descriptive to indicate someone with further right- and left-wing tendencies than I have, but that’s hardly derogatory as you’re making it out to be.
                          -
                          And as far as being able to cite your actual positions, you’ll have to give me a while on those, as your positions were stated so far back in the past of your posting as to be nearly impossible to find. The only thing I’ve been able to find of you over the last three months of you posting is insults and derogatory statements, however, your close association with Anniee and constant “downing” of anything done by left-wingers is pretty indicative of your political stance.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          I seem to recall Anniee calling you out on your appeasement too — no wonder you group us together in the League of Evil.

                          Don’t worry, I’m sure you’ll be able to find them and cite them. After all, you’d never make a baseless accusation, right? And if you did, I’m sure you’d own up to your honest mistake, rather than slinking away as though you had something to hide.

                        • froofrou says:

                          Being polite when you’re outnumbered is not “appeasement” in the sense you’re using it. Cite where I’ve “appeased” anything as opposed to being polite. The opinion of a frother means nothing to me.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          There you go. Opinion: marginalized. Mind: firmly closed.
                          A pleasure, as always.

                        • froofrou says:

                          You’re running away when called out again. Please don’t let the door hit you on the butt this time. You left prints last time.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          I’m not running away — you’re just pointing fingers to not seem a coward. Again. The thread you quoted me on, remember your discussion with Anniee about your…unique…perspective on Christianity? I believe she called you a coward, too.

                          Ctrl-F is your friend; it should be easy to find. But no, I’m sure that won’t be enough for you. And I wonder why that is? Oh, right, my opinion means nothing to you. At least you had the courage to finally admit it.

                          Pretending to debate, pointing fingers, grasping at shadows, all while you’ve already resolved to not change your mind under any circumstance — that’s intellectually dishonest. Why does that word keep coming up in regards to you?

                          Still, at least you *finally* had the courage to begin to admit it.

                        • froofrou says:

                          I was referring to Anniee as a frother, not you, but way to grab that shoe and jam it on your foot.
                          -
                          My “unique perspective” on Christianity is just that: a perspective. Just because it doesn’t agree with yours gives you no right to castigate me for it. And she called me a coward for being able to gently state my views as opposed to running in guns blazing and telling people they’re going to hell. I’ve stated my political and religious views numerous times in the past, there is no need to belabor them. I can’t help it that she (and you, apparently) have no concept of situational ethics and how to act in a crowd.
                          -

                          Pretending to debate, pointing fingers, grasping at shadows, all while you’ve already resolved to not change your mind under any circumstance — that’s intellectually dishonest. Why does that word keep coming up in regards to you?

                          Honestly, Dhoti, do you not see yourself in this statement? You don’t cite, you point fingers, you’re unpleasant to deal with, you’re thought of as a troll by anyone who has more than a five line conversation with you…..you’re generally unpleasant. I’m thinking back to just the other day when you called Eric a bigot seemingly out of the blue. Can you actually show me where you’ve been nice? And managed to state a full point without insulting someone within a post or two? Honestly, I don’t understand how your brain works.
                          -
                          You’re as closed-minded as you accuse me of being. You WILL NOT listen to anyone with a different opinion, and seem to hate me for simply being different than you and taking a different view on things. Sure, I call you out when you say stupid things, but you’re not the only one on whom I visit that bit of trollery. I see stupid on either side, I call it out. Just because I try to be nice to those who want to have a decent discussion free of insults and name-calling, I’m suddenly an appeaser?
                          -
                          I suggest you use the ctrl-f you’re asking me to use in order to find one instance where you were actually decent in a debate or conversation and didn’t delve into name calling and blatant sarcasm within the first three posts.

                • froofrou says:

                  He does seem to infer a lot of stuff that isn’t there. I was just wondering why he felt the need to attack you for stating an opinion.

                  • Intellectual cowardice and self victimization. He hasn’t felt like a victim today so he wanted to pick a fight and then make comments to feel superior.

                    • froofrou says:

                      It boggles my mind. People who do that are completely foreign to me.
                      -
                      Oh, tell Lynn I would very much like another copy of the recipe she sent a few weeks ago, as I am a dumbass and managed to delete it *blush*

                      • The sausage and biscuit or the ribs or what? Lynn makes a lot of Win in the kitchen, babe. Help me out with another clue. ;)

                        • froofrou says:

                          I’m trying to remember. It was the casserole she made from which you almost died in ecstasy. :-) But, the sausage and biscuit and ribs sounds good, so tell her to send those too!

                        • Ah yes, the tater tot one. She will be online tonight and I will make sure she looks for you on AIM and hooks ya up. :D

              • froofrou says:

                Extreme is a bad thing no matter what you’re looking at. Even drinking too much water will kill you.

    • Craig says:

      Man I’m glad someone else made this post and I didn’t have to.

  10. HellHathNoFury says:

    Um, that’s not gum. Bill Clinton sat there for 8 years as well….wait…is that…GEL?!

  11. Max says:

    Uhh, he was born in Connecticut…. not in Texas

  12. Heh says:

    Now, according to Nicholas Cage… hang on!

  13. 1984 says:

    Nope. No WMD’s here either.

  14. anniemcphee says:

    Yeah, but the question was, could he walk at the same time? The location of the gum suggests not…

  15. RWatson579 says:

    Bush is NOT a Texan. He was born in Connecticut – you can not move to Texas and suddenly be a Texan. Being a Texan is a an act of God – you have to be BORN in Texas to be a Texan! Just another Bush inaccuracy! ;)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up