Aww, Bill, let’s call it Monica!
(Bill and Hillary Clinton)
Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: Bonald via Advanced Lol Builder
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous ALASKA | Vladurday: ILLEGAL? Next »
» 421 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Geary on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… Geary on Oh God Geary on Changes at Cheezburger Geary on How Far We Haven’t … shin0bi272 on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… shin0bi272 on Oh God MrsQ of Philadelphia on Spock Facepalm JustMe on The Eternal Question MrsQ of Philadelphia on Changes at Cheezburger Miss on Osombie 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
i meen boops
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Getting told there's no homework until next week.
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
Actuallty, She Self-Represents...
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Elephant Encounter (Language Warning)
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Be Brave, Hedgie!
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Reader Squees: Camera Hoggin' G-Peeg
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
CTHULHU'S UNKNOWN SISTER
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Pedobear Does Not Approve
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
I'm Really Only Posting This Because I Lol'd For No Reason
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Better Give 'Em the Chair
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Tom Hiddleston Totally Looks Like Young Robert Englund
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
I'll Feed You Red Panda
Excellent!
How so? I must be tired after reading the prolonged debate down below but this just doesn’t really make much sense to me.
Ooohh. Duh.
Heh.
I agree dude
FIRST
20/20 vision means the eye can see normally at 20 feet. 20/15 is better; the eye can see at 20 feet what another eye sees at 15 feet.
where the hell was that comment SUPPOSED to be posted???
Danbala is observing the ordinal post rule.
I used to have 20/15 vision. I miss it…
It probably ran away and into your blind spot.
20/10, it’s great while it lasts isn’t it?
Of course, once people realize it, they make you find the car by having you read the license plates from in front of the store.
That’s the downside.
DAMN
You can’t even fail correctly. Double fail!!!
*snort*
That just made my day.
True win.
Agreed. First one that’s really made me laugh in a long time!
And so, Funny was restored to the Republic of PK, and all was right with the world. . .
Democrats, Republican, Libertarians and people of all political affiliations held hands, shared cookies, sung campfire songs and knit sweaters for the winter.
Don’t forget the topless part of the campfire. That’s the most important part!
Shhhh, that was supposed to be a secret, Eric. We have to lure the women in, and THEN we tell them about the topless part.
Right, because if they hear we’re going to be exposing our moobs they’d never show up (heck, I wouldn’t).
I’m holding out for clothing optional, myself!
No, seriously, you don’t want that.. trust me on this one..
Truth–I don’t go to topless beaches, but I do go to clothing optional beaches. Partly because the men are more likely to behave…they know that WE are looking, too!
The few that I have been to, it seems that the people who shouldn’t excersize the ‘optional’ do..
We’re all humans, whether under 30 or not, hard-bodied or not. One of my favorite memories is of an elderly couple (I think at least 70′s), with wrap-around tans and endless smiles!
bitter troll is troll not hooman
I only go to bottomless beaches (bashful about the moobs and all – plus it’s a pain to keep them shaved).
Is that anything like a bottomless pit?
Only if you’re Courtney Love.
“Don’t forget the topless part of the campfire. ”
`
“Topless” — OK
“Campfire” — OK
“Topless” and “campfire” together in the same sentence — I don’t think so.
That’s like frying bacon nekkid.
In the words of the lol cats “OH GOD WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?!”
Ooh a funny LOL, finally
Nah, it sucks
Blows?
Both apply to California..
EASY THERE EDS!! EASY!!!
Ok, not ALL of California.. Moro Bay is awesome, Big Sur is way cool, and anything north of San Fran and south of Long Beach is tops.. better?
Much better, thank you
Pretty much the whole coast is awesome, except for Eureka, which is a hole.
Is a Eureka hole anything like a glory hole
Well if it is it’s name makes sense…
“Oh… UHMM…. EUREKAAAA :exclaim:”
Whoops.
No. With a glory hole, there’s the potential that at least one person will have a good time. This is not the case in Eureka.
CALIFORNIA: Thank God it’s so far away from us.
Oh wait, that’s not right.
Blow is just an expression.
Hee!!
Okay, I’m twelve.
I didn’t know they had a canine division of the secret servicer.
Even though Hillary will deny it, there was nepotism involved..
I think you mean necrophilism
Well, ok, that would work too.. it would be kind of ick though..
Necrophilism is ick, but Bill getting a bj from the dog isn’t?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
At last!!! Something FUNNY!!!!!!! WIN WIN WIN WIN!
Goodness!
Ten years ago, a popular national politician had an affair. After leaving office with a 60% approval rating, “funny” jokes are made a decade later about his infidelity. This particular one involves a dog leaping (as they are wont to do) at the politician’s lower extremities. His wife exclaims that they should name the dog (whose actual name was “Buddy”) after the woman that he had an affair with. The dog is jumping at the politician’s lower extremities the same way that the woman he had an affair with did. This is ironically humorous because she would never say such a thing!
Absolutely side – splitting!
Dude. Don’t explain the joke.
Buzz kill.
*flips the byrd*
*plays freebird*
*has chicken for dinner*
*does the funky chicken*
Farts in his general direction*
*googles chicken farts*
Invokes rule 36.
-
-
-
The moderaters giveth, and the moderators taketh away.
Can’t embed the video, so here’s the link
The thought was so deep it took two posts to get it low enough?
Aw man… you killed it for me.
I’m pretty sure i saw this years ago. Many years.
Buddy died in 2002.
It is a relief to see something fresh and new in contrast to those old, tired Palin jokes, yeah.
They’re still scared of Clinton, you know. That’s why all the ongoing Clinton jokes.
Really? Even though he’s no longer relevant?
Danbala, please go read your comment again. Fresh and new? Palin jokes are new (relatively), Clinton jokes are the ones that are old and tired (and that’s not the only Clinton-related-thing that is AYO!)
Ah. No. I am jesting with the multitude of complaints on the last lol, which were about Palin jokes being old and tired.
It might have been some sort of sarcasm, even if not good.
I must be slow this morning.. usually I get your sarcasm..
I think maybe it’d have helped if you’d just spent a half hour reading and commenting on the Palin thread and how it’s getting old, and then have this pop up. ;p
Hah… Indeed.
The funny is back!!!!!
There, a Clinton funny to appease all the sad little republicans who are still butthurt over all the Palin jokes. *pat pat*
Not butthurt. BORED.
Strewth!
They used a board? How can you not be butthurt?
If you got bored, damn straight you’d be butthurt!
Now, where’s the Obama LOL’s?
Eh. He’s not really funny. Now Bill, that guy is a barrel of laughs! Gotta love Bill!
Yeah….I guess the republicans need something to laugh at too. It’s funny, they always complain about how there are NO lols making fun of democrats, but have you SEEN all of these Clinton jokes? Come on, people…
Ho hum another Clinton sex joke. Can’t you rethuglicans come up with some new material? Say what about a Senator who wears diapers with his hookers. Or a Senator who has a wide stance in the mens room. I know, you could do one about a governor who’s sleeping with a foreigner.
You’ve got to be kidding. Conservatives don’t bother with Clintoon jokes anymore; they were funny then, not now. Believe me there is PLENTY to mock on the national stage right now without going back to these buffoons.
Oh please….like we are not going to have to put up with at least 2 decades of Bush jokes from the left side. Deal with it…we do/will
And for the past 8 years of breathless, pearl-clutching outrage, semperfid- good point. It’s been absolutely ridiculous and it’s no less ridiculous now. Yeah, the left just does NOT know how to suck it up and deal. Ever.
Oh Anniee how hateful of you.
as illustrated by this sad, petulant 90′s retread…
I saw a photo of Al Franken in a diaper, why didn’t that get on the front page? Oh never mind, it was pretty icky.
Good Lord, man! Even PK has it’s dignity !
You’re new here, aren’t you?
WHYY! OH THE HUMANITY!!!
Oh, the huge manatee!! [link]
Hillary’s a sea cow? WHUT!!!???
They dumped Hillary’s sea cow too!!?? That’s it!! Those people should just not be allowed anymore pets.
Not sure, but I heard Monica ate Chelsea’s Sea Monkies.
Or was that Bill’s seamen. I can never remember…
Dribble with a blue dress
Blue dress on……..
*snicker*
So, no one saw that photo!? Seriously, it was loaded up and ready for captioning… I so wanted it to go away though.
Oh I saw it. And after I stopped spewing, I gouged out my mind’s eye with Hillary’s dick, because seeing that was oh-so-much-less-painful!
I have to agree, as much as I wanted to see an alternative type lol here on the front page, I don’t think I could have stood it. But.. then I couldn’t turn away either…
Anyway, I never see this picture that I don’t feel sad. Poor Buddy was nothing more than a photo op to these cretins, for the purpose of rebuilding their image. Then he died because they didn’t give two shits about him -not enough to take care of him themselves or to see to it that the people they dumped him with were suitable. He was run over by a car because no one was watching out for him. At least they didn’t keep their promise to adopt a new baby to polish their image up – that was one ploy that was thrown around very briefly by Hillary. Considering Buddy the Photo Op’s fate, I am grateful it was at least just a dog.
Right, so everyone who ever had a pet that got run over by a car is a terrible pet owner.
They had two dogs die the same way…
And they dumped Socks on the same person. Sounds like Anniee’s a bit, I don’t know, RIGHT on this one
I’ve had at least three of my dogs run over in traffic, had at least two disappear into the woods never to return (old age on those), and one got kicked by a horse and never recovered. In between those I’ve had three Jack Russells that are still with me, a beagle mix that I gave to a good family when I moved, a great Pyranese that lives with my mom, and too many cats to name. Does that make me a bad person?
Total strawman. It’s beneath you, really.
I’m just answering the charge of having two animals die in the same way.
-
I really can’t see the issue here. Obviously the Clintons were too busy with their lecturing or whatever else to properly care for a dog and cat, so they gave them up. What’s the deal? I’ve given a dog to a neighbor (as I said) when I moved, and the next time I moved my cat had to go live with my dad. It wasn’t dumping, just necessity. If the Clintons couldnt’ care for the pets for whatever reason, at least they left them with a caring person instead of tying them in a gunny sack and dropping them into a fast moving river.
Froo’s right having 2 pets die the same way means absolutely nothing. And given an animal to someone else who has the time to care for it shouldn’t be viewed as “dumping” the animal somewhere. I mean they could have just dropped him of in a park or something if they actually wanted to dump him or taken him to the pound. At least they made an effort to place him with someone they thought would be able to care for him.
Ducks for cover waiting for Annies’s response
Cite for where I said such a thing please?
Oh so this is just an attack because it’s the Clintons, and not anything to do with a pet getting run over by a car at all. I thought you were trying to make a point. An ill-thought out, ridiculous point, but a point nonetheless.
I feel sad when I see the picture because they NEVER cared about this dog. He was a photo op and nothing more; to be dumped off with someone else who didn’t watch him properly after they were done posing with him. Had they not used dozens of such ploys it might not be an issue, but this was SOP for them. Like I said, I’m glad the other idea they had thrown around at the time never happened – a baby might have fared much worse than poor Buddy.
Who gives a crap? It’s a dog. I’m sure it got better attention, food, and care than half the kids in this world, even if it wasn’t necessarily from the Clintons.
Sad but true.
Oh puh-lease, you don’t give two shits about that dog. It’s just another excuse for you to rip on the Clintons. I’m surprised you’re not ripping on the dog for being a part of the Clinton family. Sheesh.
I bet that dog was a dirty dirty liberal, worthy of her scorn.
Then why is she mad that he died? Maybe he was really a CONSERVATIVE DOG and that’s why they dumped him!!!
No no no, if the dog was conservative then it’s even more of a travesty to her! Don’t fuel the fire Eric!
The dog was a spy! The whole thing was a conspiracy! Didn’t you see the article I posted below…
It’s even worse than that! The dog was aborted!
Again; they didn’t “dump” him. Liar skank.
Begone, Trollus Maximus!
The Lord and Baby Jeebus compels you!
They dumped him back, and to the left. Baaaack, and to the left.
I’m a troll because YOU say so? Well, what an honor!
Name calling is Trolling.
No internets for you!
iz you gud nuff to be trollz?
Thanks LatinaTroll, for letting us know why you are a troll!
yay troll population growing, what bridge you live under?
Well, Charro isn’t so much a “troll” as “funny”.
She lives under the bridge of Sexy.
*blushes*
Aw, Igor, you’re embarrassing me in front of my new troll!
Why are you defending him? Would you do the same if it was your neighbor who allowed two of their dogs to run in the road and get killed, and got a cat and then dumped it, even though they could afford it?
No. You’d be clucking about said neighbor like a hen on crack-corn…
Pets get killed by cars. It doesn’t mean that the people who own them are to blame, or that they are not responsible pet owners. Geez.
Jeezus Cristus, SB, that’s exactly what it means! Haven’t you ever heard of leash laws? Pets are NOT supposed to be running loose in the road — it’s irresponsible!
You’re wrong on this one. It’s okay to admit it.
Leash laws vary from city to city and state to state. In my particular city we don’t have a leash law. Out in the country (where Mom lives) there is no such thing as a leash law. You can’t blanket something like that, DT. It’s beneath you.
Fine. Let your dogs wander and get killed. I guess you need a specific law to be a compassionate and responsible pet owner.
We’ll just keep using them as cadaver dogs for V AN class.
Did you know the driver of the car who hits your dog can sue for damage in any state?
You’re assuming that my dogs were neglected because they weren’t in a tiny pen or kept on a leash. They weren’t. We have a small farm (17 acres) where the dogs and cats have plenty of roaming room. Because they do what dogs do and get out in the road every once in a while isn’t neglect. It’s allowing a dog to be a dog. I’d be cited for animal cruelty if I kept my dog chained up simply to keep it out of the road.
-
And yes I am aware of that law. It’s the same type of law that allows people to sue the state for hitting a deer.
Who said neglected? I said it’s irresponsible to allow them to wander in the road.
Fence your property to protect the rest of us from your animals. It’s only responsible. Aren’t you a conservative who wants less government? Why do you need a law to keep your goddam dogs out of the road, thus protecting them and me?
That sue the state and win over hitting a deer ruse is bullshit, and you know it. Cite where this has ever worked successully. You find it, and I’ll scream judicial activism. It’s not even remotely the same when I cream your dog and it crushes my grill. I want your insurance policy to pay. That means you’re personally responsible.
We have fences. Ever seen a dog dig? It happens.
-
I’m still trying to figure out why it’s a big deal that the Clintons gave Buddy to someone who had more time to spend with him.
-
And there’s no point in me citing anything on the deer, because you just said you woulnd’t accept it if I did. So se la vie.
No, I said I’d scream judicial activism.
Are you having shiny issues today?
…and it’s not that they gave the dog away. It’s that they got the dog in the first place with no intention of keeping it, as they knew the size of the house they were moving back into before they even GOT the dog, AND the cat.
Or did Hillary REALLY believe she was going to succeed Bill to the throne, so she could keep both of these animals?
I’m just trying to figure out why Buddy’s fate is such a big deal. As much as I dislike the Clintons, it doesn’t make them irresponsible pet owners to give their dog to someone who can care for it better.
The way I see it, it says they didn’t really want Buddy in the first place. Most people that get a pet it becomes a part of the family. Then, they give it away after they are out of the whitehouse? Doesn’t look right. Same with the cat… That’s what I think.
But… the dog died when he was five. Not much better, eh?
When did they give the dog away, though?
Danbala… not sure, but if the dog was in their care when it was hit by a care wouldn’t that make it even worse?…
Possibly, but it would ivalidate all the “they never wanted him”-arguments.
On the other hand, making shit up is pretty fun, so by all means, don’t let me stop the hilarity. ;p
Hee hee hit by CARE…
*laughs. hit by a care*
Yikes, based on my own experience, I loved my cat Phoebe. I cried when I had to give her to Dad so that I could move. It wasn’t that I didn’t want her, it’s that I wasn’t able to keep her. I still miss her
I dont’ think that makes me a bad pet owner, any more than it does the Clintons.
Whoa, nellie, I didn’t make anything up!
froo — still waiting on that cite
But Froo, your example is different, I imagine if you had the finances available to the Clintons you would have taken Phoebe, unless of course your husband or kids developed an allergy and that would be different.
Where did I ever say anything about suing a state and winning? I just said that you can sue.
froo — the Clinton’s knew they were leaving the White House and returning to their “too small” New York house.
They fu(ked up. You didn’t. Stop taking it personally.
Wow. That’s really disingenuous of you.
I like it.
But if your dog smashed through my window my insurance company would actually come after you for it, as a dog is your real property and thus it’s your fault. Just so you know.
Socks the cat pre-dates the Clinton presidency. (link to Wikipedia), and was apparently Chelsae’s cat. I gather they placed the cat with the secretary as Socks had bonded with her when Chelsae went away to college? But I’m just speculating here. I wasn’t too thrilled to hear that they kept Buddy and gave away Socks, but I’m a cat person.
I also find it amusing that both Buddy and Socks have Wikipedia pages!
Dogs get out of the house. It happens, all the time. Normal people who aren’t president of the United States go in and out of their house and sometimes they’re juggling more than one thing and the dog gets out. When we were kids my brother left the door open too wide and our dog got out and was hit by a car. Was he an irresponsible 8 year old? Was my mother irresponsible for letting her 8 year old open the door? A later dog got loose and went on a jaunt because he was a 165 pound St. Bernard who broke the thickest chain we could get at the pet store. Were we irresponsible pet owners because we didn’t weld the chain links together? My current dog broke through the screen door to chase a squirrel when in five years of owning him he’d shown no inclination to either chase animals or go through doors. Am I a bad pet owner because I didn’t anticipate this? No, I’m a human being and accidents happen. If you think every person that ever had a dog get loose doesn’t deserve to be a pet owner then you better prepare for the pound and the humane society to start euthanizing a lot of pets because there isn’t going to be a lot of people left to take them.
So I’m driving home today, and I see this dog on a leash get away from its owner and bolt down the street, going full bore
The last I saw the owner was about a half mile behind the dog. So I pulled over, got out of the car and punched the owner in the face. Okay I’m kidding about that last part but the rest is true! 
Anyway, I’m not going to admit I’m wrong, because this is a matter of opinion and I don’t agree with yours.
Here’s an interesting article about the incident: I especially appreciated reading this part:
The former president will not be charged with breaking the town’s leash law which bans people from letting pets off their property while not under control.
Reminds me of the time I got away with jaywalking. Take that, law and order! In your FACE!
But…. lawbreaker!
Seriously, though, he could have been, if anyone was hurt/anything damaged. Teh law is teh law
People are always shocked about that, where I live. They bring their animal in to treat it and end up being charged for allowing it to roam free. Also — insurance companies come after the pet owner for damages. I even heard of a case where the person who killed the animal (St. Bernard) was so traumatized the owner’s insurance company ended up paying for the driver’s counseling…
Buddy wasn’t mistreated, he was taken care of up until the day he died, does it matter if he was a prop or not?
-
And where was it ever said that he was a prop? Out of curiosity…
I never said he was mistreated; neglected perhaps but not abused.
And perhaps you are too young to remember the circumstances surrounding when they got him. Every time the Clintons got any bad press, they would pull something out of their asses – they PAID television producers (Carsey was one of them I believe) to come up with ideas for these staged ploys. Buddy followed close on the heels of one round of bad press and promptly disappeared from any news tidbits unlike other first dogs, who will show up in further interactions with the families. Another idea that was floated *just before* the Buddy hoopla was Hillary announcing they were going to adopt a baby. This seemed to be an answer that involved a lot less trouble and time, because staffers could take care of the dog.
As soon as they lost their staff to take care of their dog, there went the dog; it all makes perfect sense since they never wanted a pet anyway. It was just one of those things, like bombing an aspirin factory to get Monica off the front page, or that little staged thing where she shook off his hand.
Anyway, all this is heavily documented in Hell To Pay by Barbara Olson and before anyone squawks, she spent years on the counsel investigating every aspect of the Clinton’s lives and every single claim is footnoted and documented. It’s amazing what you learn that goes on behind the scenes.
This is the first of the adoption thing that I’ve heard of. Where exactly did you hear about this one? And just for something different, can you provide a reliable source?
Oh whoops. I didn’t see that bit at the end where you said where you got it. Tell me more about this smear campaign, um, I mean book about the Clintons? Eh, actually nevermind.
You really ARE stupid, SB. Leave me alone.
Alright, I’ll leave you to your righteous indignation, or misplaced anger, or psychosis, or whatever it is that so clearly ails you.
SB, you should have noticed that Anniee took off her tinfoil hat, and was about to launch one of her “major wing-nut” tirades about something that never happened. Again.
Here, I have a s’more left over from the picnic.
She shoulda listened to Clever Dog.
WHERE did you get that pic of Anniee???
Hah!
Why thank you!
*devours s’more*
BE GONE TROLL!
(Flings monkey poo back)
Look out everybody! A monkey poo flinger!
Sock.
So the troll is telling itself to leave? That seems unnecessary. The troll could just leave and be done with it.
If only it were that simple.
trolls never leave, but we do drop leaveings
I’d be more impressed if you dropped candy.
I’d be more impressed it it dropped acid.
Oh wait…
I’d be more impressed if he gave me acid for *me* to drop.
What upset me the most is how they tethered him to the exit ramp out on 95. Monsters!
Nah, they were going to Wally World, and forgot he was still tied to the car. Sad, really.
You’d be suprised how often similar things happen…
I do loves me a little lampooning, however.
“Nah, they were going to Wally World, and forgot he was still tied to the car. ”
`
No, that was Mitt Romney:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html
The Clinton’s dumped Socks on her, too, from the time they left the White House up until he died in February. That cat did NOT live with the Clintons, even though she was supposedly Chelsea’s.
Hmm.
And I have it on good authority that those “socks” were painted on for the “cute” factor. Criminals!
No, I’m being serious. Need a citation for that?
Pet dumping pisses me off no end. The Clintons clearly did that.
Exactly. He was nothing to them – just a photo op, an image enhancer and they dumped him the minute the photo shoots were done. They NEVER cared about him and that’s what pissed me off as well. Maybe if she’d hired a gardener to watch him like she did Chelsea he wouldn’t have gotten run over; who knows.
Chelsea got run over ?!!!
She was never a very good prop …
ROFLMAO! Rushie, is that you….
Sure, I’d like to see a cite. It seems to me that they handed the cat over to someone who would be home – I’d do the same, rather than have animals fed by sitters. “Dumping” implies getting sick of a pet and taking them to a shelter.
No, it implies using your animals as a photo op and then dumping it on the nearest political underling when said animal ceases to be useful. Cite.
So, anyone who ever had to give away a pet is bastard? Or just when it’s a president?
Why? Did you give a pet away when it stopped being politically useful? Monica????
Lewinsky got run over ?!
…hit by the ugly truck.
… driven by the gardener who said, “I’d hit that,” and did.
Ruined her blue dress and everything
….with a spade and a hoe….
She was spayed?
…with a hoe!!!
Spade no..hoe yes
Wow, she needs to stay away from those gardeners.
Alright I just had to look up this Buddy business, should have known better than assume that Anniee had her facts straight about anything…apparently, the Clintons got Buddy in 1993 and kept him and Socks until they moved out of the White House, although the dog and cat had to be kept separate ‘cos the cat didn’t like Buddy (I smell a conspiracy). So when the Clintons moved out of the white house, they couldn’t keep the dog and cat separate anymore, so they gave Socks to their former secretary. OH THE EEEEVVILLNESS!
That dog was probably a Liberal anyway. And a foreigner, and taking our jobs.
If this was anyone else you’d be flipping out.
And your facts are wrong.
No, I totally wouldn’t!
So if your neighbor’s dog was running loose in the road and shitting on your lawn it’d be like: “meh. Hope it gets hit soon!” for you?
I certainly wouldn’t be blaming my neighbor for what was obviously an accident and accusing them of using the dog for nefarious purposes. My cousin had to give her dog away when she had her first child because the dog was elderly and kept snapping at the baby. Does that mean she never loved her dog and “dumped” it when it wasn’t convenient?
Exactly Jane.
Deep Thought, if my neighbor’s dog got loose I would try to catch it and return it to its owner. If I couldn’t catch it I would notify the owner.
This scenario has happened more than once. There was this golden retriever who used to visit me at one apartment I had. I have no idea why he came to my door, it was on the second floor of a little complex. But he’d stop by from time to time, and I’d call his owner to come get him after giving him a good belly rub. I never even found out where he lived, and it never occured to me to chastise the owners, who were very nice people and, judging by the good temperment and overall healthiness of their dog, good pet owners too.
Stop individualizing this. We’re talking about a wealthy politician here, people, not your average joe who lost his job/became allergic/had behavorial problems and had to give up his beloved dog in a tear-jerking goodbye scene.
I find it amusing that no one will fess up to what you’d actually do if your neighbor’s dog was running loose and you hit it with your car, causing damage you had to pay for out of pocket and killing the dog.
Go ahead and lie to yourselves. I’ve seen what “real” people do in this situation, and it ain’t pretty.
Dude.
1. They didn’t dump the dog. They kept the dog.
2. I would be devastated if I hit a dog with my car! Or any animal for that matter. But you’re diverting; there was no report that Buddy caused damage to the driver’s car (although it was noted that the 17 year-old driver was “chasing” the contractor’s truck that Buddy was chasing, so it sounds like bad driving on her part).
3. No one’s lying to themselves. Get over it.
No. You get over it.
Can’t link, so here:
THE NINE SUSPICIOUS FACTS ABOUT BUDDY’S DEATH
1. With all the high-tech security available to an ex-president on the Chappaqua property, the Clintons had apparently somehow failed to install what a dog expert called “the one essential safety feature, an invisible fence.” This system would have given Buddy a small shock as he neared the property line, warning him not to cross it. Unless, of course, it had been turned off.
2. We are told that on Jan. 2, the day of Buddy’s mysterious, violent end, “neither Clinton nor his wife was at home.” Is this really a coincidence? Would the former first couple pay $1.7 million for a suburban headquarters and then just happen to not be at home when their dog is killed? On the other hand, if you wanted to do away with your dog, you’d want no fingerprints. Wouldn’t you arrange to be out of town that day?
3. Would the trained ex-presidential personnel entrusted with Buddy’s care really unintentionally allow him to “bolt” through the “front door” chasing a “contractor”? Who were these handlers? Why haven’t such key eyewitnesses been subpoenaed?
4. Who was the shadowy “contractor” and why did he leave in such a hurry? What was he installing at the Clintons’ residence, which had been fully remodeled several years ago? Isn’t it strange that he would leave the gate open, when any “contractor” worth his salt knows that an open gate plus a dog equals a lawsuit?
5. Buddy is said to have “scampered” fully “600 feet down the road,” and then another 100 feet on heavily traveled Route 117 before he was hit. Have you ever “scampered” 600 feet, the length of two football fields?
6. The 17-year-old “high school senior” who allegedly ran over Buddy has been described in the press as a “pretty brunette”-the same description, practically, that was once applied to White House intern Monica Lewinsky. What, if any, was her connection with the ex-president?
7. It is illegal in Chappaqua to allow a dog to run outside your property without a leash unless the dog is “under the owner’s voice or visual control.” Was Buddy actually being controlled? If not, who decided, at what level, to break the law? Why did an employee of the town clerk’s office in heavily Democratic Chappaqua tell the New York Post (Jan. 4) that the penalty for violating this regulation only applies if a dog is picked up by a dog catcher?
8. Celebrity dog trainer Bash Dibra has now come forward, in the Post (Jan. 4), to say that he strictly advised Clinton to always use a leash with Buddy outside the home. Why was this celebrity advice ignored?
9. Writing in the New York Times, a former Clinton aide, now a shadowy “communications consultant,” discloses that when Clinton was in office-perhaps at the very height of the impeachment scandal-Buddy would “pad on down to the basement of the West Wing, poking his nose into the wastebaskets outside Sidney Blumenthal’s office.” Yes, that Sidney Blumenthal, the partisan conspiratorialist who is so often at the center of Clintonian machinations-the same Sidney Blumenthal who had seemingly eerily anticipated last week’s deadly event by writing a play about a scandal involving the president’s dog. Why Blumenthal’s trash, and no one else’s? What did the doomed Labrador find there? Had Buddy smelled too much?
Connect the dots. It doesn’t add up. No other conclusion seems even possible. Perhaps some subpoenas would help shake loose the real story. But who in Congress will step forward to do what is necessary?
Remember: When they say it’s not about the leash, it’s about the leash!
LATE-BREAKING EVIDENCE OF COVERUP
One who might know the answer to some of the questions surrounding Buddy is Trumper, Buddy’s neighbor. (See “Who Is Trumper?” WSJ, Aug. 2001.) But, as if to silence this witness months before the event, Trumper, a Shih Tzu, was put down by its owner in October. Was Trumper ill-or simply another name on the growing list of Clinton victims?
That’s hilarious!
IKR?
They never would have allowed the car to speed off like that, much less take that unusual curve at Houston and Elm! You would have felt an army presence on the streets that day. But none of this happened. It was a violation of the most basic protection code we have, and it’s an indication of a massive plot based in Dallas, er, I mean Chappaqua.
I’ve never had to give a pet away, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t perfectly acceptable ways to do it if that’s what needs to be done. If they had dropped it off at the pound, I’d call bastard behavior.
They didn’t “have” to give him away. They never wanted a pet in the first place. What part of this is unclear in your idiot brain?
Forget it; I’m done with your idiotic questions; I’ve seldom met such stupid people in my life. If you address me again I and I notice it’s you I’m not answering.
Idiot Idiot Idiot!
Stupid Stupid Stupid!!
Marcia Marcia Marcia!!!
Well, there’s an old saying that you’re known by the company you keep, and if everyone here is stupid, and Anniee is here……..well……
*whooop*
*WHOOP*
*WHOOP*
Red alert! Red alert! Logical fallacy approaching!
Duck and cover!
There’s also an old saying that you’re known by the quality of your enemies. I need better enemies, actually.
We’re all stupid together!? GROUP HUG!!! *sings kumbaya*
*hugs yikes and sings along*
Hey, do we get S’mores this time too?
I’m SURE it’s mandatory when you’re singin’ kumbaya.
Nah. Bongs and Doritos are all one needs for a kumbaya circle…
Anniee, if anything, you need to stop arguing like it’s a point of pride sometimes. I’ve noticed, though- when you guys argue, gotta give a little to get a little- or at least, that’s how I get along with Dhoti. It miiight be a good strategy to pretend to consider their ideas every once in a while.
Promise?
That’s okay, I know that you can’t stand being called out when your arguments are faulty and your sources are garbage.
You’d know, right?
Wow! I’m sure she’s devastated by your kindergarden level witty comeback! Try “Doodthead” next time.
Sock sock sock sock sock. You are a big old smelly sock.
Quoting from your cite: “Socks didn’t get along with the frisky Buddy, so the White House had to keep the two in separate quarters. Since this arrangement would be no longer possible in the Clintons’ smaller home in New York, Socks was left under the care of Bill Clinton’s secretary, Betty Currie.” Nazis!
Say whatever you want to justify it. They dumped Socks.
Wang invoked.
Seriously, I think you’re wanging the dog here …
We can agree to disagree. If it WASN’T Bill Clinton, but neighbor-down-the-block Bubba with the overgrown weedy lawn, 17 squalling children and a perma-blocked GTO in the front yard, you’d be pissed that he allowed his animals to be treated in such a manner. You’d probably even call the ASPCA.
Remember that.
I will. I will indeedy.
I have a neighbor similar to what you describe, who lets his dog run loose adjacent to a busy street. I mentioned this to him as politely as I could. He said, in a sneering, whiny voice, “Well, go ahead and call Animal Control, nobody’s stopping you”. I said, “I don’t WANT to call Animal Control, I want your dog not to get hit by a car!” I actually did end up calling Animal Control, not because I disliked the dog, but because I really didn’t want him to get hurt. What this proves, aside from that my neighbor is a butth0le, I’m not sure.
They dumped Buddy too. The point is, Bo is a family pet (whatever else I might think of the Obamas they are obviously a pretty tight family and the dog does not seem to be a ploy for an image). Millie was a family pet. Checkers was a family pet.
Buddy was a prop and nothing more, and THAT is what’s despicable, especially in hindsight knowing the end he came to. He didn’t deserve to be used and discarded. No dog does.
One night when the regular caretaker for his dog Liberty was unable to be at the White House, President Ford offered to take care of the family pet. He was told that Liberty usually needed to make a late night “business” trip to the South lawn.
As scheduled, Ford and the dog left the White House without telling the secret service. As the duo strolled the grounds the service secured the White House second floor, as is done every night. Ford was unable to use the elevator or return to the private quarters until he alerted guards that he was locked out of the Mansion
Why does that seem strangely appropriate, somehow? Are you sure that wasn’t an SNL sketch?
Liar.
Troll.
DWN…..????
I thought either Bill or Hillary was allergic to the cat, and once Chelsea went off to college there wasn’t much reason for them to keep an animal they were allergic to.
That sucks.
Who did they give Buddy to?
Jeebus. On the Rainbow Bridge.
*chillaxes*
No, really. I haven’t found any cite saying they gave the dog away.
I’m still looking, too. I guess I took Anniee’s word for it: I knew about Socks, and had heard mention of Buddy, though.
“I guess I took Anniee’s word for it”
Tsk, tsk, tsk. ;p
But if you notice, I was posting under the auspices that the Clinton’s were indeed the owner of Buddy.
Damn, my reply ended up in the wrong place, at the bottom of screen. Ah well, will copy-paste:
‘Yeah, up until the “It’s that they got the dog in the first place with no intention of keeping it”, which together with yikes’ “The way I see it, it says they didn’t really want Buddy in the first place” was enough of make-belief to react. I just thought it’d be good to ask for a proper cite for the alleged dumping of the dog before their assumed callousness became even more of a “fact”.’
DT, I guess that’s why I’m taking a little personally
I’m not making the connection with Buddy simply being a prop (any more than Chelsea was a prop) just based on the fact that they gave him away when they left office. It looks bad, sure, but most of what the Clintons did looked bad.
There is that…
And there is also the fact that you (DT & froo) are BOTH willing to believe anything Anniee says, as long as it’s about a democrat, and it’s negative. Quite the circle-jerk you 3 have going on.
Fu(k you, Ivan. I’m not a republican, but nice try.
You wanna go after me? Super. Let’s go.
Ooo! Methinks I hit a nerve!
No, you’re just a dickhead. Good work.
But Froo is disagreeing with Anniee here.
Really? How’d I miss that? He’s usually in lock-step with Deep Thought. Who’da thunk it. I guess I was just reacting to the “most of what the Clintons did looked bad” comment.
LOL, you really don’t know Froo very well ITMA.
Yeah, I went back and read, and I mistyped. SORRY FROO! I guess I was thinking “yikes” and stuck you in by mistake. You may whip me. Hard.
Of course not. He’s a troll, just looking for attention.
Ooo! DT thinks I’m a troll. Is this where I’m supposed to get all butthurt? *snort*
F%ck you, troll.
Linkie.
Maybe fu(king off will help with your short term memory. Am I circle jerking her, or am I a terrible horrible person for calling her out as a racist, which I’ve done, well, a LOT? I’ve even linked to one of her racist lols, but I can’t seem to find where now.
Which is it, ol bean?
See, you are a goddam troll.
Ooooo…!!!!!. ( head explodes)
So, which is it, fu(knut troll?
But we don’t know for a fact who had possession of the dog at the time of its demise.
I cannot be held accountable as lying when I believed what was said in the process of a good-faith discussion, now can I
No. no. But until someone can prove that they, in the face of all newspaper articles etc., actually gave the dog away, the whole discussion of whether they were naughty for getting the dog in the first place and then giving it away is a frigging non-discussion.
They did not give their dog away.
(They did, however, manage to let their dog get run over, which is another part of the discussion and still seems valid.)
Naaaaww. They just neglected it until it killified itself.
Emo-bud.
Neglected it? Maybe he was just a Houdini. Houndini.
Dogged Ruff-lefield.
They didn’t give the dog away.
“The former “first dog” was struck at about 12:15 p.m. on Route 117, a busy two-lane street close to the Clintons’ home on Old House Lane in Chappaqua.
According to police, Buddy was struck by a vehicle driven by a 17-year-old girl after “playfully chasing a contractor” who had just left the residence. Secret Service agents rushed after Buddy when they saw him chasing the contractor’s van off the property, and arrived at the scene moments after the dog was struck, New Castle police Lt. John Vize told CNN.”
Yep – I found similar texts. i was kinda hoping that someone who claims they gave him away could tell more about that particular fact.
“I cannot be held accountable as lying when I believed what was said in the process of a good-faith discussion, now can I”
Ah, but if it were being said about a republican, you’d be screaming for a cite. Hypocrite.
See above. Quit bein a fu(knut.
Oh wait, you can’t help it.
Another nerve! (see above).
Fu(k you. Oh I forgot, you’re ED makes you incapable.
Not really. You’re the one that brings the stiffy, as you said “fu(k you” meaning you want to fu(k ME. But that’s neither here nor there…it’s an exit only. Sorry to disappoint you old bean.
F*ck you, troll.
They didn’t “dump” him. Liar.
Beautiful! Epic Win!
Yeah, up ’til the “It’s that they got the dog in the first place with no intention of keeping it”, which together with yikes’ “The way I see it, it says they didn’t really want Buddy in the first place” was enough of make-belief to react. I just thought it’d be good to ask for a proper cite for the alleged dumping of the dog before their assumed callousness became even more of a “fact”.
“I did not have sexual relations with that dog, Monica Lewinsky”
atleast its not hillary
I’ve seen this picture captioned the same way before…
Jeebub Chrispies! This baiting thing is FUN! Tyler, Eric…hats off to you for showing me this new sport!
Fu(king troll.
Whoa, partner. Don’t get me involved in this battle. Especially if you and DT are talking about doing each other in the butt. No thanks. LOL
Butttt…. Eric! What what in the butt???
ROFLMAO!
It’s not anywhere NEAR a battle. Anniee lied, DT swore to it without bothering to verify or ask for a cite. I called him on it, and all he can do is bawl “fu^k you” and call me a troll.
Hey DT. Hypocrite. *snicker*
F+ck you, troll.
Well, you’re just being tedious now. The fun has all drained away. I’m done with you now DT.
F.U.C.K. YOU. TROLL.
Hypocrite.
Ok, sorry folks. I’m really done now. No really.
F.U.C.K. YOU. TROLL!
This is like Wimbledon. *sits down with popcorn*
Will you be my ball girl?
*makes Puss-in-boots eyes*
While normally I am pervious to Puss n Boot eyes, I think I’ll pass on this one.
*opens beer to go with popcorn*
Did you say beer?
*sits down next to charro*
*passes Eric a Blue Moon*
*dreams of charro’s full moon*
It is horribly white.
*embraces European descent and charro’s derriere*
Hey wait, how did you know I was of European descent? Maybe I’m an albino aborigine.
RULE 36!! You found me!
You cannot hide from the Rule 36.
SO hot… want to touch the heiney….
AAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Ok, I lied. I’m actually a mermaid, I have no heinie. Didn’t you see my picture? *points up to picture*
*gasps for air*
Fishy, fishy, fishy, fish…
*invokes rule 36, part deux*
*righteously indignant*
I am NOT a fish! I am of the mer-folk.
I’m just hot for the fish part. Mind wearing a bag?
You stay away from my fish part or I’ll bludgeon you with it.
With your fish part???
*pants eagerly and prepares to implement rule 37*
this beer is bitter
You’re drinking the wrong beer.
But bitter beer is better….
bitter troll was not complaining, bitter troll was stateing fact, and you can always trust the facts of a faceless troll on the interwebz who clearly isnt very brught
its the only beer that i can find under my bridge
*sigh*
If I give you a beer, will you try to use punctuation and capitalization?
its against my troll religion
Well, I guess you’ll have to drink your bitter beer then.
You have to admire how he sticks to his troll convictions.
Yes, I suppose holding to convictions is admirable when rewards are offered to let them go. Though, I didn’t know it was against his religion when I offered the beer. Had I known, I wouldn’t have. That’s just cruel.
beer is allowed in my troll religion, its proper grammar thats not allowed. we do that then the next step is evolveing, standing upright, then what? we have to move out of your childrens closets and stop liveing under bridges? get a job? THEN IT ALL GOES MAD!!! MADDNESS I SAY MADDNESS…but beer is ok. makes us bloated smelly stupid and have to pee. trolls support this
No, no your trolly brain got it backwards. Had I known that proper punctuation and capitalization were against your religion, I wouldn’t have offered you beer to do them. Taunting people with tasty beer to go against their religion is something meanie heads do.
trolly is a speciest slur, and it makes me bitter to think about it. we perfer the more progressive troll or underbridge dwelling american
How horribly uncouth of me. You have my deepest apologies. Your Underbridge Dwelling American brain got it backwards.
forward go to troll a troll you?
How much of that bitter beer did you drink?
bitter troll is still breathing, so not enough
Bitter Troll is suicidal?
suicidal? never, i would never miss another day to spread my bitterness like butter, smooth creamy spreadable butter
bitter troll is confusing.
Butter troll is bitter.
butter troll is bitter trolls sister, we dont talk. she very populare. easy to spread
Oh yeah, I remember her. The beer goggles were really going that night.
im thinking to move under the bed of a 9 year old boy, my bridge is very damp
I’m sure that will make you much less creepy and weird.
Look what it did for MJ and Blanket…
And people say making Blanket statements are wrong.
*groans and rolls up into a ball of pain*
Oh, the punnity!!
Don’t sue me for pun-itive damages.
D’oh! *is* wrong.
*disavows all grammatical-error knowledge*
But Blankets can be wonderful comforters…
troll realestate is under bridges closets and childrens beds, sadly the closet was full of tom cruise and john travolta
What about Ted Haggard?
he was in the boys closet down the street, nicer part of town. bitter troll cant afford a closet that nice, and will refer to bitter trolls self in 3rd person to add to bitter trolls creepy factor
Maybe you could give up drinking to afford nicer digs.
give up drinking? BLASPHAMY! burn the witch! BURN HIM/HER
*sigh*
“Maybe” and “could” don’t mean I want you to, merely a suggestion to help you save money. It’s your life.
*shrug*
money? trolls have no need for money, we eat billy goats and small children, we drink the magic beer of bitterness given to us by our troll god
Interesting. With what commodities do you negotiate for your troll real estate?
fat kids, the fatter the better.
Do you use butter to fatten them?
i feed them pig lard while they are sleeping, warm gooey pig lard
I enjoy dripping Everclear into their ears while they are sleeping, using an eyedropper. The hilarity that ensues the next morning is priceless.
thats mean, i eat the fat kids and trade them for things, but i am not mean to them, just use them for cattle. sometimes with A1
I never said I was a nice person.
That’s good. We’ve got to do *something* about the obese youth problem in this country.
We could drip methamphetamines in their ears while they are sleeping using an eyedropper.
just use those worm things that pissed kirk off in wrath of KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN
yes you did. i cant prove when , where or how. but trolls need to proof to say anything we want, and i can prove it
Bitter troll can’t use his reply button.
bitter troll chooses not to
Bitter troll sucks.
the marrow out of the bones of children, but its what all trolls do.
STOP DOING THAT! I COMMAND YOU TO EAT YOUR OWN WASTE PRODUCTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCE!
but troll poo is where babie trollz come from! …..wait i can eat my own young? nummy!
Troll bashing rule-
You may only bash people who willingly ignore facts that invalidate their points, refuse to add anything to the conversation, and/or act like general idiots and assholes.
Ivan, don’t call Anniee a troll, and at least do it creatively.
Igor, you do realize I’m twice your age? I’ve been troll bashing since you were in diapers, boy.
And actually, I wasn’t calling Anniee a troll, I was calling her a liar. Then DT swallowed Anniee’s lie, and when I called him on it, he started telling me to fu(k off, and called me a troll.
Que DT to say “fu%k you, troll”.
Fu%k you, troll.
You’re welcome.
Arggggghhhh.
Shnarzenbornerrific totalium.
Exactly what I was talking about.
Deep… don’t fu%k trolls, I’m almost 99.9% sure you can do better.
-Heads off to shave and stops banging NO_MO-
So you think so for me too, right?
-Rubs mini-beard-
y no love for trolls?
Anniee didn’t lie. Anniee had all her ducks in a row and knew the whole story behind Buddy’s unfortunate sham “adoption” and subsequent neglectful demise after being dumped because the White House staff wasn’t there to look after the poor unwanted thing anymore. I remember well when they got him – there was an event like that every time he was fighting off bad press; and Buddy was highly recommended as a ploy to stave it off. So was a baby, but thank God they didn’t do THAT one.
If DT knew about the fact the Clintons’ pet adoption was nothing but a scam, good for him. Either he remembers or he’s read about it since. I happen to remember it and it’s all documented in Barbara Olson’s work.
Once again – Bo is a pet. Millie was a pet. Checkers was a pet. Buddy was a prop. Never seen or heard from again after the photo op above until his untimely death. Unlike real white house pets that show up in human interest stories and photos periodically because the people in question have actual, you know, contact with them.
Anniee, am I a prop? I’m thinking that if I let Eric adopt me and that since I’m a dragon…
This thread is funn!
I dunno. Spaced out, but hey.
No, because Eric would likely have at least a modicum of human emotion for you. That would be a fundamental difference in the two situations. But – er…if you like, go ahead and do it; no skin off my nose. :/
umm, how old is this? i mean seriously
congratz for the baby :3 LOOL
Not funny, nor does it make sense- grammatically or joke-wise.
Oh geez, I really need the brain bleach now.. thanks for that!
Big username, teensie pee-pee.
You’d know.
Fu(k you, troll.
Her IQ is 118. Can you beat that?
Again-
Troll be gone! Back to your Mother’s basement!
Mother died a few years back. And her house had no basement. What do I do NOW??
You bring so much to the table, Latina. Bravo.
I keep telling you I don’t swing that way old chap. It’s an exit only.
F^ck you, troll.
Go fu(k yourself.
Well, ITMA DID say this, Charro…
Jeebub Chrispies! This baiting thing is FUN! Tyler, Eric…hats off to you for showing me this new sport!
That doesn’t excuse Latina not bringing anything to the table.
Just beans, rice and a killer salsa!
bitter troll demands nachos
Bring nachos for my bitter troll, LatinaTroll!
Charro — I’m appalled! That’s SOOOO racist!!!!
Never said I wasn’t racist either.
Though for the record, I am speciest. I hate everyone equally.
And a pitcher of margaritas, por favor?
be raciest if i tell um bitter troll’s motel room needs fresh towels?
Teh racism… it’s spreading!!!
Equal Opportunity Detractor, here…
Margaritas with nachos does sound good. Where have you been, Tess?
spreading like butter of the blubbery bottom of a morbidly obese child
You have violated 42. You will be expunged.
Okay, people, let’s just say this- Deep Thought nor Ivan are trolls. There is no contesting this.
Latina, however, has added nothing to this thread whatsoever, and should not be defended.
Ivan made a joke, maybe in bad taste, maybe not.
You’ve made plenty that have rubbed me the wrong way, DT, but I deal with it because I know you have plenty of the funny, and so does Ivan.
So really, there’s no need to argue. It’s in reference to me and Eric having a discussion about taking the week off to bash each and every troll we could find.
Unlike Admiral Lipschitz.
Can I take a ride on your boat, cap’n?
Deep, cut it out, please. You’re both clever, and by the way, Deep Thought, are you someone stealing an identity or did you change your poop-symbol? O.o
His terrible tiller might trouble your tribbles.
We can only hope.