Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


You know, you should’ve put a bra on.



hillary clinton and natalie portman

You know, you should’ve put a bra on. And you should’ve worn a nicer outfit. That is, if you have one.

(Hillary Clinton and Natalie Portman)

Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: dunno source via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 184 comments

  1. Semperfidd says:

    hmm..no pic that I can see

  2. Kate says:

    Compared to her bright orange pantsuit this isn’t too bad.

  3. Izzy*&hearts* says:

    It’s not really funny. Your not missing out.

    • Semperfidd says:

      Just came up..the pic..not me…your right…not very funny

      • Eric-in-STL says:

        Both of you!!
        You’re you’re you’re you’re!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • pittypat says:

          At least they didn’t end their sentences with a preposition, like Hilary up there.

          • I_Am_Iron_Man says:

            THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!

          • eddiepscetti says:

            Reminds me of a joke that goes something like this:
            -
            A college student was wandering around campus looking for the library, when he sees a professor. Walking up to him he asks, “Excuse me, but could you tell me where the library is at?” The professor puts on his most indiginant look and says, “Young man, you are now in college and you should have learned by now that you never end your sentence with a preposition!” The young man thinks about this for a minute and then asks, “Excuse me, can you tell me where the library is at, asshole?”

            • Captain Wow says:

              I hear that one around here all the time. My Papa, when I asked where my Grammie was ‘at’, he’d say between the A and the T.

              • Kate says:

                There’s a very famous story about Winston Churchill, in which he makes a remark or something, and is promptly informed by an advisor of some sort that he had just finished a sentence with a preposition. Churchill proceeded to ream out the adviser, using sentences which all ended in a preposition, all of which ended in a preposition. I forget the details, but it’s a cute story.

    • Biscuit says:

      Yup yup yup….feminism in politiks – still judged on what you wear, and not what you have to say or do. :/

  4. Kate says:

    Compared to the bright orange pantsuit this isn’t too bad.

    • flodnak says:

      The black pantsuit is dull, but professional. The nipple exposure is at best sloppy and at worst trashy. And the caption isn’t particularly funny….

      • little gator says:

        Flodnak, I saw what you did there.

        • bodo says:

          Wait a minute, this can’t be little gator and flodnak from AFU, is it (I realize it’s been more than a decade since I was active there)? If so, howdy (and I hope you’re still making those cookies). If not, never mind.

      • Igloo McCoy says:

        Yeah, because when the word “pantsuit” comes up, it really conjures images of exciting fashion choices!

        • viking gal says:

          Exciting fashion choices are not necessarily a good idea in politics.

          • Eric-in-STL says:

            Professional usually isn’t exciting, and you’re right. It’s not really supposed to be. You don’t want your clothes distracting from what you’re doing.

            • Naoyusimi says:

              Even the word, “pantsuit” reeks of sexism. It descends from a time when the unusual choice of a suit with *pants* must be differentiated from what a woman is *supposed* to wear.

              • viking gal says:

                Good point! My feminism meter missed that one!

                • Igloo McCoy says:

                  Does the feminism meter come with a misogynist alarm? Did you spend the extra tolerance levels and get the racism detecter?
                  I have the full set–homophobia radar including. I think it comes packaged with the socially liberal politics : )

              • Deep Thought says:

                It’s a pantsuit, vs a suit with a skirt.

                You really are a freak, aren’t you?

                • Deep Thought says:

                  From Wiki:

                  Formerly, the prevailing fashion for women included some form of coat, but paired with a skirt or dress. Hence the name pant-suit.

                • viking gal says:

                  Gee, thanks DT, because of course that ‘freak’ includes me as well. The English language does have some sexist underpinnings here and there, and commenting on it is not hostility towards men. I think perhaps you’re a bit over-caffeinated today?

                • maxon says:

                  I think that was the point of the comment – why point out the difference?

                  • Deep Thought says:

                    Because there’s an entire industry devoted to doing just that. Do you want them to lose their jobs?

                    • viking gal says:

                      Sure! Have you ever tried to find decent clothing for a female viking? Off with all of their heads!

                      • Tessie says:

                        “Have you ever tried to find decent clothing for a female viking?”
                        `
                        Sears has some OK-looking metal bras, but just TRY finding a horned helmet that will fit over long blonde braids!

              • Tessie says:

                “Even the word, “pantsuit” reeks of sexism. It descends from a time when the unusual choice of a suit with *pants* must be differentiated from what a woman is *supposed* to wear.”
                `
                I don’t see it quite that way. I interpret “pantsuit” as slacks and a matching blazer, as opposed to “suit”, which I interpet as a skirt and a matching blazer. I suppose it could be labeled sexist in that only women have the option to wear a skirted suit, but that’s stretching it (the point, not the suit) a bit.

                • Deep Thought says:

                  So does single and double breasted. What are you gonna do?

                • Igor the Vigorous says:

                  Agreed- I think it’s an identification, rather than implying that they’re not supposed to be wearing said articles of clothing. Women can wear two different kinds of leg-covering thingies (So can men, but let’s just say for our purposes they refused to.)
                  therefore, the type of clothing they choose for the suit should be identified in the word, because when it’s a woman, it could be one of either.

                • Roguefemme says:

                  I think that’s what she means: if you refer to a woman wearing a “suit”, the assumption is automatically a skirt suit unless specified otherwise. Since skirts are gender-specific (and not nearly as practical as trousers), that’s where the sexism comes in- the assumption.

                  The assumption is also a thinly-veiled directive: you’re female, thus you should wear a skirt.

      • Roxie says:

        I don’t know why it’s considered sloppy or trashy! It’s just a natural reaction.

        Also, to hide erect nipples is not really what bras are made for.

  5. Kate says:

    Ick, didn’t mean to post twice, it didn’t show up the first time. >_< Sorry, folks.

  6. eddiepscetti says:

    YOu can always tell Hillary’s fake smile. She looks like a stunned mullet.

  7. GazUtd says:

    The only reason this could have been voted onto the front page is because of Natalie’s nips cos it ain’t funny.
    But nevertheless it’s always great to see Natalie’s nips so WIN.

  8. The Steve says:

    Why does she need a bra? Her girls are plenty perky without one…

    It’s obviously the icy chill radiating from Hillary causing her to nip out.

    • Semperfidd says:

      I will have to, for the first time, agree with Steve on this one.

    • Kyle Broflowski says:

      That should be the caption.

    • Naoyusimi says:

      “It’s obviously the icy chill radiating from Hillary causing her to nip out.”

      OK, I don’t care on what side of the political fence one falls, that SH!+ was funny.

      But seriously folks, even the small ‘n’ perky should really wear a bra, otherwise they won’t stay that way for long, and once that connective tissue (ligaments and skin) stretches, only surgery can do the repair.

      • viking gal says:

        Besides, not wearing a bra with that shirt in public is rather like not wearing pants over your tighty-whities or boxer briefs in the same situation. Unnecessarily distracting!
        OK, it’s a beautiful thing in Natalie’s case, but it is also distracting, no?!

      • Tessie says:

        “even the small ‘n’ perky should really wear a bra”
        `
        Time and gravity aren’t kind to the big ones, but they don’t do the small ones any favors, either.

    • Cap_n_Jack says:

      Steve I definitely concur! I was hoping that Ms. Portman and her lovely perky breasts weren’t aroused by the stank of a decaying dyke like Billary.

  9. Jessica says:

    It looks like she IS wearing a bra…look at the curve from her left armpit to her shoulder. The shirt is slightly whiter in the area where a bra would be.
    It’s just not a padded bra.

    • Chasity B says:

      For real, it doesn’t matter how big and supportive your bra is, if it’s not PADDED, then the nips will rear their ugly heads.

      • bodo says:

        Um, sorry, but disagreeing on your choice of adjective with regard to nipples. They’re one of my favorite things (at least, the adult female kind, no offense to any males reading this). I mean, I’ve never tried to work them into the song, or anything (it never occurred to me; perhaps I’m not dark or twisted enough – need more lessons, apparently).

        • Eric-in-STL says:

          Now I’m gonna have to spend some time and rewrite that song to make it about breasts. I have no choice. Thanks.

          • bodo says:

            Nipples, actually, although if you can work breasts in that’d be awesome (as long as it’s tasteful, and all). Oh, and d’mention it – anytime.

          • froofrou says:

            See my chest,
            See my chest,
            Put my boobies to the test.
            Use your eyes and hands and lips and teeth
            and we’ll provide the rest…..

            Boob du jour,
            Fine with me,
            Why it’s all quite nice you see,
            Try the C-Cup, it’s delicious,
            Don’t believe me? Ask Salicious!

            We can’t sing, we can’t dance,
            After all Sir, this ain’t France,
            And a booby here is never second best!!!

            Go on, unfold the blouse now,
            Take a handful of the boob now,
            See my chest, see my chest, see my chest!!

            • Deep Thought says:



            • Deep Thought says:

              All I am saying. Is give bewbs a chance.

              • If all the soldiers in the world
                put down their weapon, and picked up a woman
                what a peaceful world this world would be!

                Aw..redheads not warheads…blondes not bombs! Talkin’ bout brunettes not fighter jets!

                Aww it’s got to be sweet sixteens not M16s
                When will the government realize
                it’s got to be funky sexy ladies

      • Cowlifornia says:

        ugly??! no self respecting human would consider a breast or nipple ugly!

    • Naoyusimi says:

      No, I don’t think so. If anything, there might be something built into the shirt, but it’s useless and thin, or it’s a camisole, no bra.

    • ClariPossum says:

      THIS! I saw that spot, too, though I’m not sure if it’s a shadow. Even so, you’re right, if it’s not a padded bra, they’re gonna poke through.

  10. mjc says:

    Hilary should have put a paper bag on.

  11. Czernobog says:

    I will never get tired of this picture.

  12. RoQ says:

    Nipples FTW

  13. forge says:

    Natalie *is* wearing a bra; she’s just got extremely muscular little nipples and she’s *very excited* to be meeting Hillary. And no, I don’t mean anything perverted by the word “excited,” just excited.

  14. Kate says:

    Caption sucks. Not only is it stupid and denegrating, (which, frankly, is par for the course, I don’t even notice anymore) it’s not even funny! The ultimate sin!

  15. Sud_Vicious says:

    Not very funny, but gets boost for making fun of Mrs. Bill Clinton.

    • Naoyusimi says:

      Luuuuuvely. You’re such a sexist puke, the woman you hate doesn’t even get her own identity anymore.

      • Deep Thought says:

        Lighten up feminazi freak.

        • pittypat says:

          You wang?

          • Deep Thought says:

            I bang! :lol:

            • Naoyusimi says:

              @Deep Thought (yeah, right):
              I didn’t start the crap, the Sex Pistol up there did, Mr. Limburger cheese fathead pill-popping draft-dodger!

              • Deep Thought says:

                Get back in the kitchen. I’m hungry.

                • Naoyusimi says:

                  You’re always hungry . . . you should graduate from Oxy’s to speed, now, so you can lose some weight. You have a face for radio, but I’m sure you’ve been told that before.

                  • Deep Thought says:

                    Don’t you have someone to suck off?

                    • Deep Thought says:

                      Here. let me answer that for you:

                      “No, I don’t. My mouth is such an emasculating buzzsaw no man would ever come near it for fear of pulling back with shredded junk.”

                      There we go.

                      • Naoyusimi says:

                        ROFL
                        If a woman’s “mouth” (i.e., words) can emasculate you, you’re not very secure in your manhood, now, are you?

                        Or, your grasp of language + critical thought is tenuous.

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          Oh yeah, that’s right, we DO want you to speak… :roll:

                          Or, your grasp of the nuances of relationships is apparently, lessee, non-existent?

                        • viking gal says:

                          @Deep. I think she is mistaking your humor for hostility towards women. But then it does kind of read that way in this thread. Just sayin’

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          You’ve gotta admit there are elements of Poe’s law emanating from this “woman.”

                        • viking gal says:

                          Perhaps. But telling her to go find someone to perform oral sex on? I find that really offensive, myself.

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          Since when?

                        • viking gal says:

                          Oral sex between consenting partners is one thing.
                          Telling a woman to go perform it on a random guy is basically telling her to go ‘service’ a guy. Do you ever tell a guy to go perform oral sex on a woman, when you are mad at him?

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          I asked her if she had someone, remember? I didn’t’ tell her to go blow someone. You may want to reread that.

                        • viking gal says:

                          I did. I see your point. And Naoyusimi isn’t playing nice.
                          Your words do still bother me. However, I will admit that I have a low tolerance for guys using sex imagery to put a woman down. I find it demeaning to both sex (which should be both fun and a positive thing), and to the humans involved. (I don’t tend to hear women do it very much, but that might be the crowd I hang with?)
                          So, I guess my hangup got caught up in your argument.

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          I apologized to you in the next lol. :lol:

                        • viking gal says:

                          :rolls:

                        • viking gal says:

                          Argh–smilie failure!

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          I LOL’d about the “don’t you have someone to suck off”-business, until the “emasculating buzzsaw” bit followed … then, I saw him as one sees a rabid animal: ready to be put down.

                          I’m not “playing nice”? Hell, I thought I was just having fun with a namecalling loony until it went on and on and on. Ah, well.

                          So, DT, you’re really NOT a namecalling loony? VikingGal is completely right (and I’m NOT one of those extremists, either, BTW) about the language having sexist “underpinnings”, “pantsuit” being one of them, as I DETAILED above, before your revamping of it. It was fun for a bit, but you woudn’t seem to let it go, so–yeah, I was fooled … ::shrugs::

                          I have stuff to do, anyway.

                          Later, all.

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          You know, if you walk around all the time with Sandy Vag you’re the only one whose tender parts are rubbed raw. The rest of us just get out of your way when we see you coming. Just sayin’.

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          @VikingGal:
                          I see the “sex slam” as the “I give up” of nearly any argument btw. men & women. I take it with a grain of salt, shall we say, because it’s usually the desperate reach of 14-year-old boys when they can’t think of something else to say. Or, those with the 14-year-old boy mentality.

                          (Oh, wait, that’s all of ‘em. ;-) )
                          Ta-ta!

                        • Igor the Vigorous says:

                          Stopping? Naoy, don’t bother trying to discuss things with Deep. Even if it’s not right, or insulting, take it with a grain of salt- he just likes to poke holes in arguments and be sarcastically crude.
                          It’s what he’s great at. :D

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          (Oh, wait, that’s all of ‘em. ;-) )

                          Now who’s sexist? Good work, kettle.

                        • Igor the Vigorous says:

                          C’mon, Deep.
                          Let’s drop it and move to another topic, regardless of the anger…. :P

                        • Deep Thought says:

                          Oh, I just find the “we’re victims and you stereotype us with your baaad sexist words and ways” amusing coupled with the “all menz are dumb horny teenagers” mentality.

                          I knew it was coming.

                          A hypocrite is a person who – but wait, who isn’t?

                • Tessie says:

                  “Get back in the kitchen. I’m hungry.”
                  `
                  If you’re hungry, I think you should get back in the kitchen. You won’t find anything good to eat in the living room, except maybe some cheetos that fell between the couch cushions, but bitter troll already called dibs on those.

      • Igor the Vigorous says:

        Hey Naoy! Ignore DT, he’s just a troll like object filled with skepticism, and I don’t have any particularly funny memories of Sud. So it’s not worth it.

        • Deep Thought says:

          Bullsh!t. I command the woman to STFU, get to her knees, feed me grapes and service me as I desire. :roll:

          • Igor the Vigorous says:

            But I thought that was my job?
            BECAUSE I LEARNED IT FROM YOU WHEN YOU WERE HIGH OVER 9000 AND WOULDN’T LEAVE BRITNEY ALONEEEE!
            Sorry. Meme outburst.

  16. Grace says:

    um… ba-zing?

  17. Ferial says:

    Hmmm … she’s wearing a bra. Otherwise those silicone fakes would slide out and land on the floor.

  18. Badgerjohn says:

    This is my lesbian fantasy come true!

  19. sexyness says:

    natalie portman is hawt gigitty gigitty goo

  20. Blargh says:

    Even Hilary’s birthday suit is a pantsuit.

  21. pizatski says:

    Natalie Portman never needs to wear a bra….ever.

  22. Scriptor says:

    hmmm…. boobies.

  23. John Kuzmeski says:

    
    Bottom of Form 1
    Special Report
    Air Date: Monday, May 19, 2008
    email this article to a friend Watch the video
    Banish the Bra?
    Reported by:
    There Know Laws Say Women Has To Wear Bra, can Go Bra Less
    All The Time There Know Write Laws Books Say Women Has To Wear Bras, Just Go Braless Med Health Issuer
    News College Med Health Issuer class By John Kuzmeski
    Once considered a necessary undergarment, bras today lend more than just support and they have become a fashion statement! But some medical experts say the bra you wear every day could be bad for your health! 7′s Sorbonne Bannered looks into the possible link between bras and breast cancer. No longer just hidden under shirts, Victoria’s Secret brought the bra out into the open, making it a real fashion statement. But could a woman’s bra actually be dangerous to her health?” Our research has shown that the bras issue, we believe is the leading cause of breast cancer”, said Sydney Ross Singer, who wrote a book about what he believes is a link between breast cancer and bras.” In fact to look at breast disease and ignore bras is like looking at foot disease and ignoring tight shoes,” said Singer. Singer’s center conducted a study involving five thousand American women, half had breast cancer.t”Risk Is Increased By Wear A Bra Or A Bra That Too Tight The America Cancer Society Work With The Governmental The Garment They Say Parole with a smile that did cosset cancan thing about what they say about at the time smoking an bra wear did cosset wear , band years 1960 poltergeist right to go braless there was a voice disapproval at the 1960 movement , four the risk of wear a bra heart cancer backbone, now 2009 but could a women “s bra actually be dangerous to her health ?” our research has shown that the bras issue, we believe is the leading cause “ said they believes is a link between breast cancer and bra,. They looked at past behavior, including how tight the bras were and how long the women wore them. Here’s what they found:
    Women who wore a bra for 24 hours a day, had a 3 out of 4 chance of developing breast cancer. If a bra is worn 12 hours a day, there was a 1 in 7 risk. And women who didn’t wear a bra had about the same rate of developing breast cancer as a man. “So what’s happening with the bra is that women are preventing the proper flushing of fluid and toxins out of their breasts,” said Singer. Singer claims a bra is too constricting, interfering with the body’s lymphatic system. This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer. “If you get rid of the bra, your breasts will finally be able to flush out the fluid,” said Singer. But mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study.” There’s no evidence in any of the world research data that I’m aware of that supports the fact that breast cancer risk is increased by wearing a bra or a bra that’s too tight,” said Dr. Emil Barrera of the American Cancer Society .Dr. Barrera says women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and not worry about their bras. “Watch their weight, exercise, drink only in moderation and don’t smoke,” said Doctor Hussein. Doctor At if Hussein, Medical Director at the Memorial Cancer Institute calls the bra study interesting, but said, “it really is hard to tell you wearing the bra in itself was the contributing factor.”
    He says it’s not the bra, but the risk factors of the women who wear them that is the deciding factor. “Women who may be overweight tend to wear bras, therefore I would say the factors that contributed to those women wearing the bra contributed to their high risk rather than the bra itself,” said Doctor Hussein. He said the issue should be studied more.
    But despite criticism from the medical community, Singer is sticking to his mission saying, “there’s absolutely nothing good about bras, it’s completely a fashion accessory.”
    He is encouraging women to banish their bras for better health, saying, “We live in a culture where women feel insecure with a natural bust line, but if the price of fashion is disease, then you have to decide whether you want to participate in that or not.”
    Singer is now studying women who go bra-free to find out if they have lower rates of breast cancer.
    New England News

  24. ARCHION says:

    She is quite accustom to letting her stuff show.
    She usually isn’t even wearing a shirt.

  25. Roberto Mejia says:

    they say Hillary clinton likes to eat P*ssy

  26. Eric-in-STL says:

    *wipes a tear from my eye*
    Bravo, bravo!!
    *gives standing ovation*

  27. brak says:

    I cried. You are among the greatest of men. I bow to you.

  28. brak says:

    OK. Him then.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up