Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 
 
 
 

 

« Previous | Next »


Note to Republicans:

x
Share


mark sanford

Note to Republicans: If you really want to defend traditional marriage, stop screwing around on your wives!

(Mark Sanford)

Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: jrod via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

This funny political picture was posted on Tuesday, July 28th, 2009 at 1:00 pm.

» 773 comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Deep Thought says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Note to the author of this cation: irony ≠ funneh.

    Reply
  2. Czernobog says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Awww, doesn’t he look adorably contrite?

    Reply
  3. VictoryNotVengeance says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Seems like anyone who wanted to believe in marriage being between two people who loved each other would shy away from cheating, regardless of political affiliation.

    Reply
  4. Luna says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    How true is this. Sigh.

    Reply
  5. Lefty says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    To all newbies, unfunny people, and people in general who need to LURK MOAR,

    Due to recent floods of unfunny jokes, creating a LOL which falls into one or more of the following categories will automatically qualify as a FAIL:

    - Republicans/Sanford/Ensign had affairs! Haha!
    - Palin resigned
    - American Economy is screwed
    - No one likes Bush
    - Hilary really wants to be president
    - Palin/McCain didn’t win the election
    - Bill Clinton slept with Monica Lewinsky

    We’re looking forward to a more LOLful Pundit Kitchen, and with your cooperation, I’m sure that we can reach that goal. Thank you for your understanding on this issue.

    - Lefty, a member of the Committee for A Better Pundit Kitchen

    Reply
    • Deep Thought says:
      July 28, 2009 at 1:19 pm

      Bill gotta BJ and Sarah needs reamed. Are those allowed?

      Reply
      • Lefty says:
        July 28, 2009 at 1:23 pm

        Not the first one because that falls into the “Bill Clinton slept with Monica Lewinsky” category. I probably should have said “had relations with” instead of “slept with”.
        And there’s been plenty “Sarah Palin’s HAWT!” lols and discussion, but it hasn’t been so overdone that it’s an auto-fail.

        Reply
        • bitter troll says:
          July 28, 2009 at 1:28 pm

          what about bill had relations with sarah?

          Reply
          • Deep Thought says:
            July 28, 2009 at 1:35 pm

            Initial test screenings had audiences puking, so they pulled the project.

            Reply
            • Lefty says:
              July 28, 2009 at 1:41 pm

              Yes. Even as advanced as modern science is now, scientists have still not been able to come up with a man-made vaccine for the eye cancer you get when you see Bill Clinton’s private anatomy. The only known vaccine is being a total skank like Monica or some rare mutation of the tough, redneck gene that Hilary seems to possess.

              Reply
              • Eric-in-STL says:
                July 28, 2009 at 1:49 pm

                Technically speaking, Hillary has never necessarily had to have looked at Bill’s anatomy. As far as we know for sure, the only time they actually did it was to have Chelsea, and they could’ve done it in the dark.

                Reply
                • Lefty says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 1:51 pm

                  I imagine that Bill’s anatomy is similar to Medusa’s gaze. Hillary must have caught a quick glance of it, and that’s what turned her heart to stone.

                  Reply
                • Shecky says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 5:53 pm

                  OK, I can’t resist.

                  Bill Clinton and Bubba Smith are sitting at the bar one day, Slick tells Bubba he’s having trouble getting it up for Hillary, and asks if Bubba has any advice.

                  Bubba says that before he hops into bed to do the nasty, he takes his unit and whaps it against the bedpost three times, and that helps him keep it up.

                  The next night, Bill enters Hillary’s darkened bedroom, walks up to the bed and smacks his willy against the bedpost three times.

                  Hillary calls out, “Is that you Bubba?”

                  Reply
                • grelbr says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 9:08 pm

                  Well, technically speaking, we don’t have any evidence in the record that Chelsea isn’t adopted. I don’t think she’s related to Hillary. I think she’s one of Bill’s by-blows.

                  Reply
          • Lefty says:
            July 28, 2009 at 1:38 pm

            Well, it hasn’t happened. (yet)

            So. . . free to do as you please with that idea. I don’t think they’ve been in the room with each other though. *shrug*

            Reply
    • Skyfire says:
      July 28, 2009 at 1:34 pm

      I’m Skyfire, and I approve of this message.

      Reply
    • eddiepscetti says:
      July 28, 2009 at 1:56 pm

      Where’s your’s?

      Reply
      • Lefty says:
        July 28, 2009 at 2:03 pm

        I tend not to create LOLs for much, since they’re never tremendously funny. I haven’t created any recently, but I did provide a link, and they were originally made for ROFLrazzi. But hey, maybe this crusade shall inspire me to create more for PK.

        (You can see I was pretty new, due to my misuse of the poster format.)

        Reply
    • Willymdi says:
      July 28, 2009 at 2:15 pm

      Well said Lefty

      Reply
    • EWAdams says:
      July 28, 2009 at 3:15 pm

      Sorry, dude. The site has morphed. It is now about political point-scoring and personally I’m having a lot of fun with it that way.

      If you want laughs, go look at ICanHasCheezburger.com, I hear it’s pretty funny.

      Reply
      • Igor the Vigorous says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:17 pm

        ICHC is not funny.
        It’s not fun, nor funny. Please, leave the site.

        Reply
        • lowly grunt says:
          July 28, 2009 at 5:02 pm

          Actually, the lolz over there have really stepped it up of late. I’ve had more chuckles there since they obviously got some new peeps with teh funneh. It doesn’t make me want to laugh like it did waaaay back when it started, but I’ll take what it’s giving now.

          Reply
      • Eric-in-STL says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:19 pm

        No, it’s supposed to be for teh funneh. We like it when it’s funny. Be more funny.

        Reply
  6. l8st8 says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    not really funny
    but oh so true

    Reply
  7. Eric-in-STL says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I was really hoping this one wouldn’t make it. Partisan fire fight in 3…2…1…

    Reply
  8. Ioannes says:
    July 28, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    You democrats are the most disgusting creatures on the face of the Earth. I’m not too keen on the Republicans, but they don’t support baby murdering and euthanasia of the elderly and sodomy as a legitimate life style. True, they screw up because they are human. But democrats are less than human. Always have been. Always will be. I for one am sick and tired of the damn bias and prejudice that this liberal leftist socialist web site promotes.

    Reply
  9. Willymdi says:
    July 28, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    I believe a great scholar once said ‘Man, can’t we all just get along?’

    Reply
  10. Anniee451 says:
    July 28, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Insert last argument on this topic: here. I guarantee it’ll be the same word for word why I find these lols to be bullsh*t (not to mention not remotely funny) and why it only matters when Republicans do something wrong. YAWN.

    Reply
  11. I Like Peanut Butter says:
    July 28, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Didn’t they already use this picture with something similar? REPEAT FAIL!!!… but I guess it’s been at least five or six LOLs without bashing a Republican, so it was time. BUT at least bash a republican in a funny manner, this isn’t really funny.

    Reply
    • Tessie says:
      July 28, 2009 at 8:54 pm

      It’s so overstated as to kill the little bit of lol it contains. If it had contained the exact same picture of Sanford, and the caption had read, “If you want to defend…” etc. without the “Note to Republicans:” part, it would have been somewhat better. Plus, being the fair and open-minded person that I am (pauses to allow for Anniee’s head to asplode and the rescue staff to put it back together), I feel obligated to point out that cheating on one’s spouse/significant other is pretty much universal throughout the political spectrum.

      Reply
  12. slic says:
    July 28, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    You can still defend traditional marriage, why not? Just because you fail at it doesn’t mean it’s not an ideal worth defending. In a perfect world everyone’s marriage would work and no one would cheat, we don’t live in a perfect world but we should still strive for perfection.

    Reply
    • bitter troll says:
      July 28, 2009 at 2:45 pm

      stive to be like bitter troll

      -troll flex-

      Reply
    • Igor the Vigorous says:
      July 28, 2009 at 2:56 pm

      True, but your ideals aren’t going to hold water with very many people after you fail at the ideal you were upholding, while you were trying to defend it.
      And the problem, I think, is this- that he’s up there parading around in front of everybody how well this thing works, how we need to protect this thing, then he goes and smashes his own version of said concept into the cement. To me, it looks like you’re disproving your own argument when you do things like that. (Not you, slic- Sanford.)

      Reply
      • slic says:
        July 28, 2009 at 8:12 pm

        Not disproving, just failing. It’s an ideal, difficult to achieve for anyone. Sanford is just a flawed individual.

        Reply
        • Eric-in-STL says:
          July 28, 2009 at 8:13 pm

          He’s flawed in that he’s a hypocrite.

          Reply
          • Eric-in-STL says:
            July 28, 2009 at 8:23 pm

            Let me expand on that. We’re all flawed individuals. But when blatantly hypocritical people try to lecture others on proper morality, it destroys their credibility. If I went on national TV and told people they should be eating healthy, exercising regularly, and avoiding fast food, nobody would listen to a word I say. Why? Because I’m a big fat ass, that’s why! Whether or not he thinks traditional marriage is an ideal that he just can’t live up to, he should’ve kept his stupid mouth shut about it because HE makes marriage look bad. Traditional marriage is ideal, except for him because he likes to fool around. His argument is shot to hell.

            Reply
            • slic says:
              July 28, 2009 at 8:35 pm

              That’s true, but you STILL should exercise regularly and avoid fast foods, it’s STILL a good idea even though some people can’t live up to it. He doesn’t make marriage look bad to me, he makes himself look bad. If he had stuck to his ideals his life would be a hell of a lot easier for him right now, wouldn’t you say so?

              Reply
            • Semperfidd says:
              July 29, 2009 at 12:31 pm

              So that hypocricy would kind of be like a bunch of politicians, both parties, telling us how good health care and social security are but not participating in either of those “great” programs. Right?

              Reply
    • Eric-in-STL says:
      July 28, 2009 at 2:56 pm

      It’s pretty freaking hypocritical, though, don’t you think? And he clearly doesn’t believe in it as much as he claims if he so blatantly violates its sanctity.

      Reply
      • froofrou says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:13 pm

        There is a very weird syndrome that goes along with politicians, evangelists, snake oil salesmen, and the like. I believe it’s called the Lucifer Syndrome, or something like that. Basically, these guys don’t realize that they will be caught. There is a circuit missing in their heads that allows them to empathize with the common people, or to think that they are subject to their own rules. It’s very common, as you can see by a cursory glance over Capitol Hill. I think that Sanford and everyone else up there who espouses it really truly believes it. And they don’t think they’re going to get caught doing the same thing they look down on others for. It’s extremely interesting to me.

        Reply
        • Igor the Vigorous says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:18 pm

          …
          Do you develop it, or am I heading STRAIGHT to politics to slap these guys into their right f*cking minds?

          Reply
        • Tessie says:
          July 28, 2009 at 9:33 pm

          “And they don’t think they’re going to get caught doing the same thing they look down on others for. ”
          `
          They believe that for a very good reason — because that’s been their firsthand experience. They’re so used to getting away with breaking the rules because they’re rich/powerful/connected/whatever, that they begin to believe that the rules really don’t apply to them, unlike the rest of us peasants.

          Reply
      • slic says:
        July 28, 2009 at 8:14 pm

        He probably does believe in it, he’s just a cheap hypocritical bastard that happens to believes in traditional marriage but is to weak to live up to his own ideals. There are many of them, there are also many that don’t fail and end up in wonderful marriages for their entire lives. (I’m NOT one of them!! But I still think it is the ideal.)

        Reply
  13. froofrou says:
    July 28, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Eric, this post is for you (I can’t seem to reply on the proper LOL (the Clinton/Edwards/Republicans getting some one) so I’ll have to put it here)…..as far as the birth certificate goes, if my knowledge of citizenship is clear, if you’re the child of a natural born citizen, it doesn’t matter where you’re born. You’re American. End of story. You’re considered a natural born American yourself as long as one or both parents are as well.
    -
    Thus, there is no need for a birth certificate, as we know that Obama’s Mama (hehe) was American.

    Reply
    • Eric-in-STL says:
      July 28, 2009 at 2:55 pm

      THANK YOU, froo. Like I said, why would Obama humor people who have been spitting on him (figuratively speaking) for the last year or more when he knows he’s legit? Certainly the POTUS has more important things to do. Hell, I’d be willing to believe he doesn’t even know people are still frothing about this.

      Reply
      • Anniee451 says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:27 pm

        Except she’s wrong. If you’re born abroad to a parent that is a foreign national, you’re not a natural born citizen. In fact, there is some question over whether having a foreign parent alone creates an issue with “natural born” but yes, it makes all the difference in the world where you were born, particularly if both parents are not citizens of the US.

        Reply
        • Eric-in-STL says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:30 pm

          Wasn’t his mom a natural born citizen? Doesn’t that make it cool? And we don’t know he was born abroad either.

          Reply
          • suicide_blonde says:
            July 28, 2009 at 3:33 pm

            His mom being a natural born citizen doesn’t make it cool, but the fact that he was born in Hawaii does, in fact, make it cool.

            Reply
            • Eric-in-STL says:
              July 28, 2009 at 3:37 pm

              I didn’t know about his mom not being a legit argument, but I figured we could always fall back on the fact that he was in fact born in this country. ;)

              Reply
            • Anniee451 says:
              July 28, 2009 at 4:45 pm

              If, in fact, he was born in Hawaii. Short-form birth certificates are not hard to come by in Hawaii for foreign born children. It’s done all the time; the only way to know for sure is the long form and that has been hidden from any scrutiny by any independent counsel or court.

              There’s also another huge problem with froo’s argument – Obama’s defense against this has NOT been that he was foreign born to a natural citizen and that that in fact makes him a citizen – he has already given up the short form and a birth announcement and claimed he was born in Hawaii (though he’s already claimed two different hospitals – Queen Anne’s was the first, but then he made some announcement about being born in another hospital so I guess he doesn’t know where he was born either) – therefore coming up with a defense NOW that he was born elsewhere to a US citizen would prove he’s a liar (as though we didn’t know that already on many other scores.)

              There is also the question of having gone to college on aid for foreign students and a passport while in Pakistan. There are genuine questions here, Eric, like it or not. I did not entertain the issue at first either; but the constant waffling (such as now claiming the long form doesn’t exist when in fact he has never made such a claim before, the student aid, etc. etc.) have made legitimate questions arise in the minds of far more than just conspiracy theory lunatics. I am not a conspiracy theory lunatic and dismissed this one out of hand at first; but now it’s looking far less like a lunatic fringe and a lot more like someone is hiding something and it would behoove us all to know what. Or why.

              Reply
              • froofrou says:
                July 28, 2009 at 4:56 pm

                So the fact that the hospital published a notice in the paper on the day he was born (IN HAWAII) on the off chance that he might one day need to rook the entire country isn’t even a little bit telling to you?
                -
                There are so many more arguments against the man that have meat, and legs to stand on, and so much substance as to bury him forever, and people are stuck on a damn birth certificate? :roll:

                Reply
                • Eric-in-STL says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 5:03 pm

                  Froo’s got a point. To keep harping on the birth certificate thing definitely seems like you’re grasping at straws. The whole thing just seems SILLY to me.

                  Reply
                  • slic says:
                    July 28, 2009 at 8:09 pm

                    I agree with Froo! It just weakens other arguments against his policies… Birther’s! Give up!!

                    Reply
                    • Anniee451 says:
                      July 28, 2009 at 8:15 pm

                      Well I dismissed it out of hand until quite recently; it’s seeing how hard he’s working to hide…something…that is not adding up. I have no idea what it is – but I’d love to know. I hope it comes out in discovery, but he’s working hard to keep it buried so who knows.

                      As far as weakening other arguments against his policies, nonsense. Those arguments stand on their own and need no “help” or hindrance. That’s just letting others set the terms of the debate and I am not about to let the left set the terms by declaring some questions too stupid to be answered and thus if you ever ask them you must by rights have no other arguments of value. That’s nonsensical and I don’t bow to that sort of whim. I’ll ask every question that has any validity and criticize every policy that is bad (God knows there are zero good ones so far – all about as bad as they can possibly, possibly be – it’s like a Blitzkreig but that’s Cloward-Piven for you) without worrying that because I asked some questions deemed silly by the elite that I have nothing to say. Forget that ridiculous line of “reasoning.”

                      Reply
                      • bitter troll says:
                        July 28, 2009 at 8:16 pm

                        ok anniee, bitter troll tell you obama mans big secret, just dont tell no ones or post on interwebs ok?

                        promise?

                        Reply
                      • Eric-in-STL says:
                        July 28, 2009 at 8:17 pm

                        He’s not working hard to hide it. He’s blowing it off completely. He doesn’t care what the birthers think because he knows it’s crap and can’t be bothered with it.

                        Reply
                      • Eric-in-STL says:
                        July 28, 2009 at 8:27 pm

                        So because liberals suspected something was up with Bush, that makes it okay to throw back something totally ludicrous with Obama? I don’t think so.

                        Reply
                      • IndieTarheel says:
                        July 29, 2009 at 7:31 am

                        Because decrying the fact that others acted batsh*t nuts, then doing the EXACT SAME THING is so much more logical.

                        For the record, I thought the left acted pitifully then, and I think the birthers are doing so now. Let’s face it: when you’re so far out in space that both Coulter AND Malkin think you’ve gone too far, you’ve gone too far.

                        Reply
                      • Bhazor says:
                        July 29, 2009 at 6:47 pm

                        So much nonsense in such a small space.
                        Amazing.
                        Well done.

                        Bush lost the popular vote in his first term and still got the presidency. Aint the electoral college grand?

                        Reply
                • eddiepscetti says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 5:06 pm

                  Snap!

                  Reply
              • pcflamingo says:
                July 28, 2009 at 5:03 pm

                “Birthers lay an egg” (link)

                Reply
        • Igor the Vigorous says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:30 pm

          Anniee, the fallacy with that argument is that it implies that people whose parents immigrated aren’t natural born Americans, by that definition, either. So only Native Americans should be citizens then? That’s just how I’m reading it, of course- running on 2 hours’ sleep here.

          Reply
          • eddiepscetti says:
            July 28, 2009 at 5:04 pm

            People who immigrate and become citizens are naturalized, which is different from natural born. Case in point is Schwarzenegger. He’s naturalized, but not a natural born citizen. Hence, he can never become president.

            Reply
            • Igor the Vigorous says:
              July 28, 2009 at 5:09 pm

              That’s not what I’m saying, Eddie- I’m trying to say that if I’m of Irish descent (I’ll leave the French-Canadian bit out of this- we shouldn’t run for ANY office, ever) because my parents immigrated then does that make me not natural born, even if they were citizens when I was born/conceived? Because technically, I’m a European kid then, and if it weren’t for our gush durn immigration, then I wouldn’t have been in America at all. Doesn’t that make me an unnaturally born citizen?

              Reply
              • eddiepscetti says:
                July 28, 2009 at 5:19 pm

                You would be considered a natural born citizen. Take for example the illegals that come across the border. If they have a child and get caught up in an INS raid, the baby gets to stay but the parents get shipped back.

                Reply
                • froofrou says:
                  July 28, 2009 at 6:59 pm

                  Actually, the mother gets to stay too.

                  Reply
                  • eddiepscetti says:
                    July 28, 2009 at 7:56 pm

                    Oh really? I didn’t know about that part.. I guess it would make sense.

                    Reply
                  • pcflamingo says:
                    July 28, 2009 at 8:54 pm

                    @froo – unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your point of view) illegal immigrant parents of “anchor children” (kids born in US of illegal immigrant parents) are deported. Something like 100,000 of them since the mid-1990′s I think. Doesn’t look like there’s any special consideration for the mom. (Link)

                    Reply
                    • froofrou says:
                      July 29, 2009 at 8:46 am

                      It depends on what state you’re in and whether or not they want to enforce it. People drop babies all the time just this side of the Rio and get to stay because of it. It’s extremely irritating.

                      Reply
                      • Zoreta says:
                        August 2, 2009 at 6:04 pm

                        Yeah, it’s been hitting us hard over here too- hospitals closing down because most of their patients aren’t insured and can’t pay, children going to school that their parents don’t pay for (because they don’t pay taces), etc.

                        It’s specially irritating if someone is a citizen but has to compete with illegals because the jobs that require qualifications aren’t hiring (ex: A teacher can’t find a job among the schools, so he tries to do menial work like construction to pay his bills until he can land a job. He suddenly has to compete against other people who will work just as hard for a lower salary, making them much more appealing.)

                        LA’s becoming a hella difficult environment for anyone who’s a citizen who doesn’t know Mexican Spanish.

                        Reply
                      • charro says:
                        August 2, 2009 at 6:09 pm

                        Yep. Happens all the time in Tucson, people go to UMC because it’s apparently one of the best pre- neonatal care places in the southwest.

                        Reply
          • Anniee451 says:
            July 28, 2009 at 8:22 pm

            No, that wasn’t what I was saying at all. Naturalized immigrants ARE citizens; their children are natural born citizens. Though there’s going to be some problems with that if they’re born overseas most likely, eh? Obama’s dad wasn’t a citizen at all.

            Reply
    • suicide_blonde says:
      July 28, 2009 at 3:16 pm

      Actually, this is not true, as I have had the misfortune of learning. You are a citizen of the country in which you were born, not where your parents were born.

      Reply
      • Igloo McCoy says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:23 pm

        If your parents are citizens then you are a citizen, right. Someone I knew was born in Ecuador or something but his parents were Americans. So he was American, unless I’m remembering incorrectly.
        Although aren’t kids born here citizens, even if their parents aren’t?

        Reply
        • suicide_blonde says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:31 pm

          Well, from what the passport agency tells me, if I was born in Canada (for example), then I’m Canadian regardless of my mother’s (or father’s) citizenship.

          And yes, kids born here are Americans, although their parents may not be.

          Reply
          • Lefty says:
            July 28, 2009 at 3:38 pm

            Perhaps you qualify for dual citizenship? Depends on the laws on the books in the countries of decent.

            Reply
            • Eric-in-STL says:
              July 28, 2009 at 3:46 pm

              I’m pretty sure Blues hockey legend Brett Hull used to have dual citizenship. His mom was American and his dad (Blackhawks legend Bobby Hull) was Canadian. He became a full American citizen in the 80′s so he could play for Team USA during I think the World Championship or something. So he was born in Canada, but had dual citizenship.
              (I know it doesn’t actually affect the Obama discussion since Hullie isn’t natural born, but what you said reminded me of Hull.)

              Reply
              • Semperfidd says:
                July 29, 2009 at 12:47 pm

                I believe that the US does not recognize dual citizenship, however, since i was born in Canada I can go back to Canada and gain my Canadian Citizenship back.

                Reply
            • suicide_blonde says:
              July 28, 2009 at 3:48 pm

              I think that this scenario would qualify a person for dual citizenship, but it has to be applied for, it’s not automatic. As far as I understand.

              Reply
          • Semperfidd says:
            July 29, 2009 at 12:45 pm

            I was born in Canada. My mom was Canadian my father was american. We moved from Canada to the US. At 18 I had to determine if I wanted to be a Canadian citizen or US citizen. I am a Us citizen but I am not a natural born US citizen so I can never be President…damn

            Reply
        • Lefty says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:37 pm

          Some countries have different rules on citizenship by blood. The link is about dual citizenship, and somewhat explains how it works for the US. The whole Obama debate is about being a “natural-born” citizen though. If he was born in Kenya like they suggested, he wasn’t natural born and only got his citizenship “through blood”. This rule is what’s keeping Ah-nold from becoming president. He’s a citizen, but not “natural-born” and thus ineligible.

          Reply
          • Anniee451 says:
            July 28, 2009 at 8:27 pm

            My understanding is that also having a parent who is a foreign national and not a citizen does not of course stop one from being a citizen but does not meet the qualification of “natural born citizen” in terms of qualification for president. In which case the birth certificate is moot (but for other reasons than those others have mentioned.) However, I am not absolutely certain of this part.

            What’s also keeping Arnold from being president is that he’s a f*cking boob who would suck.

            Reply
    • Mongrel says:
      July 28, 2009 at 3:44 pm

      Fox News just posted an article claiming Hawaii has finally confirmed his birth records and citizenship as a natural born Hawaiian. Such irony, according to the libs, Fox lies. Wtf?

      Reply
      • Eric-in-STL says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:47 pm

        It just means Fox finally got one right. Ass sniffer.

        Reply
        • Mongrel says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:58 pm

          Really…one right? How about an example of a wrong, just one? Or are you a standard lib. that doesn’t use facts or examples and base your arguments, thoughts, and ideals on rumors and contextually manipulable words?

          Reply
      • Igor the Vigorous says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:49 pm

        Perhaps they couldn’t deny something that was irrefutably true, once they had it proved to them through reason.
        Unlike you.

        Reply
      • suicide_blonde says:
        July 28, 2009 at 3:51 pm

        Well, they can’t supress and pervert the truth ALL the time. Their writers need vacation time too, you know.

        Reply
        • Eric-in-STL says:
          July 28, 2009 at 3:54 pm

          “We spent 10 hours trying to find a way to make the entire state of Hawaii look like communists who are part of Obama’s conspiracy, and we got nothing. We’re just gonna have to give this one up.”
          —
          “Damn. Okay, we’ll just have O’Reilly go off on Hawaii later for being unamerican. He doesn’t have to tell the truth either way.”

          Reply
          • Igor the Vigorous says:
            July 28, 2009 at 3:55 pm

            -Snorts and feels guilty-

            Reply
          • suicide_blonde says:
            July 28, 2009 at 3:57 pm

            “Look guys…I don’t think this whole “Obama’s not an American” thing is going to pan out. Let’s just make some colorful graphics using the words COMMUNISM and FASCISM and call it a day.”

            Reply
            • Tessie says:
              July 28, 2009 at 5:56 pm

              Also, Socialest — and it must be (mis)spelled that way.

              Reply
            • Anniee451 says:
              July 28, 2009 at 8:31 pm

              Apparently full government takeover of the private sector is not enough for you to call communism/socialism. What, pray tell, DO you think those things actually are?

              Reply
              • Eric-in-STL says:
                July 28, 2009 at 8:39 pm

                As long as the entire private sector doesn’t come begging for bailouts, I don’t think you have anything to worry about. I think with all the power corporations have in this country still, I seriously doubt we’re going communist anytime soon. I wouldn’t even say we’re going socialist.

                Reply
              • suicide_blonde says:
                July 29, 2009 at 12:00 am

                Aw, look who’s talking to me again! That’s sweet.

                Reply
              • IvanTheRiddler says:
                July 29, 2009 at 11:27 am

                Show me where the government has taken over the entire private sector, please. And keep in mind that I’m paraphrasing you; “full government takeover of the private sector” so don’t say “I never said ‘the entire private sector’”.

                Reply
      • Anniee451 says:
        July 28, 2009 at 8:29 pm

        The long form has finally surfaced and Obama has stopped keeping it under lock and key? Because I haven’t heard any confirmation of THAT yet. Who is “Hawaii” and how did he come to this conclusion when the long form is locked up or missing?

        Reply
    • Justacarolinian says:
      July 28, 2009 at 5:47 pm

      Momma’s baby, daddy’s maybe. Ok, ok. please allow me to bomb at least one joke a week.

      Reply
  14. Igloo McCoy says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    This caption gets 10x funnier if you say it in the voice of the woodshop teacher from south park. Anyway guys stop frickin’ preaching and start being funny.
    [link'd]

    Reply
    • Tessie says:
      July 28, 2009 at 6:00 pm

      I realize Mr. Mackey isn’t the shop teacher, but:
      “MMmkay, boys and girls, cheating is bad, mmmkay?”

      Reply
      • slic says:
        July 28, 2009 at 8:59 pm

        “And if you cheat, you’re bad, mmkay? So don’t cheat, mmkay?”

        Reply
        • Tessie says:
          July 28, 2009 at 9:46 pm

          Off-topic but always cracks me up: The episode where Mr. Mackey was walking down the street, and somebody threw something out of a passing car which hit him in the head, and Mr. Mackey says, “OW!, Mmmkay?”

          Reply
  15. bitter troll says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    republican womans who want to cheat, please come under the local childs bed, portal to troll world.

    Reply
  16. 1984 says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Traditional marriage:

    “marriage has been around a long time and hasn’t changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can’t marry whites, and divorce is still illegal. “

    Reply
  17. Mongrel says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Yes, Hillary is still currently a democrat.

    Reply
  18. HelOnWheels says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    I thought that screwin around on your spouse was part of “traditional” marriage?

    Reply
  19. littletelari says:
    July 28, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Uhh, Dick Cheney’s daughter is a lesbian and she is a republican…

    Reply
  20. Rae says:
    July 28, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    If only…then again, as long as they’re screwing each others’ wives they’re not screwing us.

    Reply
  21. Aaron Hong says:
    July 28, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Cheating IS traditional, I thought we all knew that…

    Reply
  22. grelbr says:
    July 28, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    So, lemme get this straight. If he stops defending the traditional family, then he can screw around whenver he wants? After all, it worked for the Slickster.

    Reply
  23. Eric-in-STL says:
    July 28, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    How many people are going to say that? Sheesh.

    Reply
  24. Sex On Wheelz says:
    July 28, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    The only way for a female republican to stop screwing around on their wife.. If for them to be married. Not a prerequisite, but I think most women that are married to women are.. lesbians.

    But nice try.

    Reply
  25. eddiepscetti says:
    July 28, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    Has my avatar changed? I’m seeing a road sign with a kangaroo on it..

    Reply
  26. amethystmarbles says:
    July 29, 2009 at 4:40 am

    but wait…..last time i checked, having a wife, a child, AND a mistress WAS a traditional marriage.

    Reply
  27. Lolnathan says:
    July 29, 2009 at 5:22 am

    Cheating is very traditional.

    Reply
  28. AllSmiles says:
    July 29, 2009 at 7:08 am

    Oh yah! I forgot. All Republicans are like this ONE FREAKIN POLITICIAN. Chill out guys, we’re only human.

    Reply
  29. Marleywolf says:
    July 29, 2009 at 7:25 am

    not that I support politicians, but sure! good going for categorizing all republicans!

    Reply
  30. cgray says:
    July 29, 2009 at 7:45 am

    Note to Democrats: If you want to be the party of compassion, you might want to ease up a bit on the baby killing. Fifty million since 1973. That seems a bit high.

    Reply
  31. Nulono says:
    July 29, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Depends h0ow far back you go. The Bible was full o’ pimps.

    Reply
  32. cgray says:
    July 29, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    When America goes completely bankrupt and the whole country looks like the anarchic Katrina aftermath, you self-righteous, phony tough liberals are going to look awfully funny with only your yanks in your hands and stupid looks on your faces.

    Reply
    • Igor the Vigorous says:
      July 29, 2009 at 2:30 pm

      Go away, troll.
      Just because no one ever loved you doesn’t mean crying out for attention from the fringies is gonna help you. It doesn’t need to be reiterated how much us liberals will destroy America, you idiot. Starting a new flamewar where one isn’t needed is just asinine.

      Reply
    • IvanTheRiddler says:
      July 29, 2009 at 2:56 pm

      Ooo yes! And when civilization breaks down and we’re all living in caves again, you self-righteous, bible-thumping wing-nut neocons can invent a NEW god, and control everyone with fear! Just like you did in the dark ages! Won’t THAT be fun? I can’t wait!

      Reply
      • bitter troll says:
        July 29, 2009 at 3:04 pm

        when the world looks like a cross between dungeons and dragons / mad max movies

        bitter troll cant wait!

        Reply
    • Eric-in-STL says:
      July 29, 2009 at 2:58 pm

      If you actually believe that, then you’re even more deranged than you sound. Geez, like anything is EVER actually going to change in this country. Things step a little to the left, or a little to the right, but really, does anything really change? NO. So STFU and GTFO and GFY. And any other internet acronym that’s out there.

      Reply
    • Anniee451 says:
      July 29, 2009 at 3:37 pm

      If the health care abortion/debacle goes through and Cap & trade passes, that gives us, what, about 2 years before we’re plunged into a depression so deep there’ll never be any going back? Both or either of them will do it, and there are leftists all over the net screaming that he’s not doing it QUICK enough despite ramming the sh*t through as quickly as possible (and despite his own balking back in ’05 screaming about Bush pushing things through too quickly.) But the left will never recognize that it was centralizing all of the private sector that plunged us into the depression; they’ll keep saying it was Bush’s fault lol. So what’s the point? They’re never gonna get it, trust me; might as well not bother fighting about it too much.

      Reply
      • IvanTheRiddler says:
        July 30, 2009 at 6:05 am

        “screaming about Bush pushing things through too quickly”

        Obama has never screamed once, not in his whole life! Go ahead, show me I’m wrong. I’ll wait. *giggle*

        Reply
    • Jane St.Clair says:
      July 29, 2009 at 7:12 pm

      Once upon a time there was a tiny, tiny chicken named Chicken Little. One day Chicken Little was scratching in the garden when something fell on her head.

      “Oh,” cried Chicken Little, “the sky is falling. I must go tell the king.”

      Reply
      • Igor the Vigorous says:
        July 29, 2009 at 7:14 pm

        I love you, Jane, and that’s a perfect example, but I think your homework is getting to you a little, no?

        Reply
      • Anniee451 says:
        July 29, 2009 at 7:37 pm

        Any economist with the slightest bit of knowledge will tell you the same. However, I think *you* might have forgotten your Henny Penny and need a little bitty reminder.

        I’ve added a twist at the end to reflect current circumstances: {http://musicalinterludes451.blogspot.com/2009/07/henny-penny-with-twist.html}

        Try THAT one on for size since you want to try condescending via nursery stories.

        Reply
        • Igor the Vigorous says:
          July 29, 2009 at 7:39 pm

          Well, Anniee, you can’t exactly blame her for the format.
          She HAS been doing Children’s stories all night as homework. Or at least, she’s been putting OFF doing children’s stories.

          Reply
          • Anniee451 says:
            July 29, 2009 at 8:21 pm

            Tyler, and I just so happened to have the perfect response already ready in the perfect format, so I posted it. Remember, I’ve heard this song and dance before.

            Also, chicken Little was not hit with 13 digit deficits, double-digit unemployment (and climbing steadily) and inflation rates like we are now, with the promise of 10 trillion MORE in deficits over the next 10 years. You’d have to be an idiot not to see trouble in THAT ffs. If she’s laughing it off onto nursery rhymes when it’s her job and her family next, so be it.

            Reply
        • bitter troll says:
          July 29, 2009 at 7:39 pm

          will you two just finally get into a big mud pit and wrestle already?

          Reply
  33. cgray says:
    July 29, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Keep yankin’ liberals. Pretty soon, Obama is going to make all of you millionaires with a fancy new “green job.” Oh, and by the way, I’m not unloved. Your mothers and sisters love to love me long time.

    Reply
  34. bitter troll pretending to be Chris Hanson says:
    July 29, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    now we KUNG FU FIGHT!

    -takes dramatic stance and pose, hair flowing in the wind-

    Reply
  35. cgray says:
    July 29, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    Hey, some of those fifteen year olds really do look eighteen. I think Chris Hansen needs to get some perspective.

    Reply
  36. cipher_nemo says:
    July 30, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Wow, way to lay down some flame/troll bait, author. :P Let’s see, if _____ really wants ______, they should stop/start doing _____. Put any words in there and the joke is still lame. Next time, try grouping everyone together, such as “if the human race wants to be taken seriously, they should stop writing lame jokes”.

    Reply
  37. Trevor says:
    August 2, 2009 at 10:27 am

    I love how all of the rebublicans saw this and proceded to freak out and start smashing and flaming anyone and everything in sight.

    Reply
  38. Rshudson82 says:
    August 2, 2009 at 10:59 am

    The sad thing is that, to most Republicans, (at least the rich white office-holding variety), screwing around on your wife IS traditional marriage.

    Reply
  39. Seriously? says:
    August 3, 2009 at 8:07 am

    I never knew Bill Clinton and John Edwards were Republican.

    Reply
  40. yea... says:
    August 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    …because a liberal has never screwed around behind his wife’s back…? right…..

    Reply
  41. yea... says:
    August 3, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    i’m not saying cheating is right, i’m saying you have a really weak argument here.

    Reply
  42. Gavin says:
    August 18, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Less self-righteousness, more lulz plz.

    Reply
  43. ilotheyou says:
    October 7, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Hey Liberals:
    If you really want to control the population…
    Kill yourself

    Reply
  44. Me says:
    July 14, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    Ohhhh, that was a burn

    Reply
Go to Top

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up