Comments on: So if the Moon landing

By: Lukeskywalker

Lukeskywalker — Sun, 23 May 2010 16:54:11 +0000

We do not have a telescope that can see that far/detailed.

By: Lenny Bloom

Lenny Bloom — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:25:04 +0000

That is just it.l There is not one photo of the landing sites. Not even a doctored up photo like all the others! They never did land on the moon. And the Museums in Europe are all reporting that the so-called moon rocks that NASA gave them are all fake. Not moon rocks at all.

By: paws4thot

paws4thot — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:20:12 +0000

Why should we take the word of a double dumbass who can’t see the 200 previous comments saying the exact same thing they are?

By: Squiggly

Squiggly — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:17:50 +0000

O.O We’re able to see the edge of the Universe?! Since when?!

By: flameow

flameow — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:13:19 +0000

Wait, are you guys serious?
Don’t we have telescopes that can see to the edge of the
universe? Why not the moon? :-\

By: sgtm75

sgtm75 — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:53:17 +0000

Yes, you can see the moon with a telescope, but you can’t see the things that were left there. Yes you can see Jupiter and Saturn, but how much surface detail can you actually see? At last count, Jupiter has 63 confirmed moons.

By: randman83

randman83 — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:07:24 +0000

AAAAhahahahahahah! I just lol’d so hard, my head hurts.
Soo funny!! XD

By: Drusilla

Drusilla — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:08:05 +0000

We?
I’d say they.
I don’t personally use it.

By: Drusilla

Drusilla — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:06:53 +0000

moon colonization? storage space? real estate? holiday destination?
earth junkyard? the possibilities are endless

By: Drusilla

Drusilla — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:56:20 +0000

They wouldn’t because they wouldn’t want private investors going there

By: Drusilla

Drusilla — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:55:16 +0000

Exactly “We” didn’t.
They apparently did.
But the government has always lied to the public so why not about this?

By: Drusilla

Drusilla — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:53:27 +0000

I’d appreciate it if you’d actually read what I wrote before you commented. Their is no evidence acquired by the public only NASA and the Government. I suppose you aren’t aware what the cold war was about or what stalinist propaganda was. Have you been on the moon did you take the pictures? We are relying on the media that was very much so controlled by the government at that time.

By: Vendetta

Vendetta — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:10:50 +0000

Cause its the MOON! What doesn’t kick ass about that?

By: Doucher

Doucher — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:41:02 +0000

As an atheist, I won’t believe it til I see it.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:27:08 +0000

You can’t, dumbass.

By: Ian

Ian — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:25:19 +0000

I don’t think you can see moon trash with a tele. Jesus that’s way out there. http://m.reddit.com/r/science/comments/95ku7/can_a_groundbased_telescope_take_pictures_of_the/

By: IHazYerCheezburger

IHazYerCheezburger — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:43:50 +0000

Exactly. The LRO is basically just a telescope in orbit around the moon. The caption doesn’t claim that the telescope must be on earth.

By: randman83

randman83 — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:03:51 +0000

What, as a troll? I would certainly hope I’m not considered a troll. I would sad many times and a half…
Yeah…

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:28:42 +0000

WRONG!

By: Maxwell Silverhammer

Maxwell Silverhammer — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:21:49 +0000

Well if we’re both right then perhaps you shouldn’t start off you reply with “WRONG” and add fuel to the fire.

By: Rando the Floydist

Rando the Floydist — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:21:40 +0000

Because liberals are funnier than conservatives. I mean, duh.

By: Maxwell Silverhammer

Maxwell Silverhammer — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:08:13 +0000

Not you randman, sheesh!

By: dhydar

dhydar — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:05:12 +0000

Since when is humor determined by partisan advantage?

By: dhydar

dhydar — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:04:00 +0000

what is this? Make Room for Ducklings>?

By: Ded-moroz

Ded-moroz — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:19:56 +0000

It’s so true – that’s what I thought when I saw it the first time. Not even the Hubble can distinguish the objects left from the landings

The smallest object that the Hubble can see on the moon (assuming the BEST possible conditions) in the visible spectrum is 76.72 m across (wavelength = 400nm). The smallest object outside of the visible spectrum is 23m across (wavelength = 120nm). The landers left on the moon are 4m x 4.3 m.

In short, expecting the Hubble to see a lander on the moon is equivalent to expecting a person to see a penny from 1.35 miles away.

By: randman83

randman83 — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:57:36 +0000

ahh, well, learn something new everyday, I suppose. The quest for “regular” status continues.
*makes troll observation entry in journal*

By: emaN

emaN — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:23:03 +0000

…and telescopes CAN’T single out such small details… The poster of this lol has failed

By: BobTheastronomer

BobTheastronomer — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:29:23 +0000

…the point Scythelord was trying to make is NO you CANNOT see them with an optical (light-based) telescope…

By: wallFly

wallFly — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:59:55 +0000

how did an un-political lol become partisan anything?

By: Heroh

Heroh — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:32:20 +0000

WAHAHAHH! Win

By: Christopher

Christopher — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:48:13 +0000

Perhaps the reason this site is frequented primarily by leftists is because so many on the right lack a decent sense of humor?

By: Blarg

Blarg — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:24:55 +0000

“Uh, Houston, we’ve got a problem.”

“Go ahead, Apollo.”

“Houston, we’ve run out of AA batteries for the face fans. I don’t think we’re gonna be able to finish the rest of the scheduled moon walks.”

“Roger that, Apollo, come on home then.”

>.>

By: Blarg

Blarg — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:22:47 +0000

Who said anything about freedom of speech? They’re ALLOWED to do whatever the hell they want to. I just wish that this site was a political lol site, and not a prop up the left tear down the right lol site. Oh well, I guess that falls under the wishful thinking category.

By: Blarg

Blarg — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:20:11 +0000

You can say my critical thinking has failed all you want to, and it will only prove how much that’s true for you instead of me, what with your propensity to stereotype as much as you are. I for one can easily laugh or criticize conservatives, although I would never call myself a conservative or a liberal. I prefer to think before making my decision on an issue, rather than follow a party line. And I do understand the political situation, and politics in general. His party IS turning on him; why do you think Pelosi says what the hell she wants to, often in direct contradiction of things Obama has himself said? It’s because there’s a split between the two. Your claim of “in the teens” would imply that everyone outside his own party would have already voted him down, which would never be the case, as the only absolute in politics is that you never have absolutes. He could easily have some support from outside the party while still be losing support within the party. You can see this right now with the issue of troop numbers in Afghanistan. Democrats are voicing strong disagreement with just about anything that increases our involvement, whereas the GOP is in general quite supportive of said increases. But don’t worry, I’m not critically thinking about any of this, just spouting off the random talking points I get from Faux News and not looking any deeper into the articles I read from various news outlets, because that would ruin your stereotyping of me.

By: Blarg

Blarg — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:15:10 +0000

I don’t contest the fact that they’re voted on by the public, but there’s a left leaning influence before LoLs make it to the vote page. When that’s all you can vote on, then that’s all that will make it to the front page. It’s amazing how we can both be right, isn’t it?

By: KANYE WEST

KANYE WEST — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:55:00 +0000

YO NEIL, I’M REALLY HAPPY FOR YOU. I’M GONNA LET YOU FINISH, BUT RUSSIA HAD ONE OF THE BEST SPACE PROGRAMS OF ALL THE TIME

By: Joshua

Joshua — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:20:58 +0000

You CAN’T see the things they left, stupid.. Don’t assume.. You make an ass out of yourself while I sit and enjoy my coffee.. retard.

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:29:00 +0000

I enjoy it. Though, the girl at work looked awfully shocked after…

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:27:36 +0000

Top Ramen? Is that for after the pot?

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:24:55 +0000

That’s cause I HATE that guy.

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:24:09 +0000

Wow, I can see my house.

By: Maxwell Silverhammer

Maxwell Silverhammer — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:16:30 +0000

I have top! Sorry, I’m dyslexic.

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:13:15 +0000

You have pot?

By: Maxwell Silverhammer

Maxwell Silverhammer — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:06:06 +0000

And it IS oh so much fun isn’t it Charro?

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:05:09 +0000

I’ve had experience with “The Motorboat”.

By: charro the Floydist

charro the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:03:40 +0000

Really? *blush* Why, thank you.

By: eldavid

eldavid — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:40:31 +0000

Yes, but could you see the junk on the moon? Because that’s the point of the statemente in the picture.

By: crankymormonastronomer

crankymormonastronomer — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:49:48 +0000

Do you suppose one reason for his unlikeable attitude was that he was tired of being asked that every day?

By: Eddie the Floydist

Eddie the Floydist — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:15:21 +0000

That’s right! In fact, ask my neighbor, she’s forever calling the cops on the guy across the street.

By: Devryn

Devryn — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:14:31 +0000

That is true, but strictly speaking, this caption is a fail.