Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


AMERICAN INGENUITY



political pictures for your blog

AMERICAN INGENUITY
If it’s got wheels, we’ll mount a gun on it and kill shit.

What is happening in the picture? Tell us in the Comments

Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: robyroxit via Poster Builder

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 427 comments

  1. wordaddict says:

    With all respect to the soldiers themselves, this is MUCH funnier than all those rah-rah lols.

  2. Scott says:

    They’re wearing Brisith uniforms smart guy.

    • ubr says:

      canadian uniforms…

    • HI says:

      Ummm, actually they are CANADIAN soldiers, that particular style of digital camouflage, known as CADPAT, is Canadian Armed Forces issue.

      • No1askedme says:

        Not to be offensive, but what do the Canadian armed forces do? I’m not making fun of Canada, I’ve been there it’s a great place, but I never hear anything about the Canadian military over here in the U.S., I’m genuinely curious.

        • I’ll give them credit, they are in Afghanistan and I think Iraq (but I’m not sure of that one). And I should add, they’re doing a fine damn job at what they are doing over there. They also have contingent forces in other parts of the world as well.

          • They drive around Kabul with their special mounted bikes and shoot mullahs.

            • HI says:

              Actually they are currently trying to root out Terroist cells in Afghanistan, as well as detecting and clearing out roadside bombs and other IED’s, as well as providing security while the country is working on becoming a democratic rather than an autocratic society. We have currently lost 131 soldiers to this mission.

              • Doogie says:

                Thank you! And in all seriousness, how many French troops have died over there?

                • Tonton Barbouze says:

                  Hi.

                  So far we mourn the loss of 36 of our soldiers.

                  A total of 3700 french troops are currently deployed on the afghan theater, 3000 of them within Afghanistan.
                  1400 are support troops, serving for exemple the camp warehouse hospital, the only role 2 structure of the region.

                  I expect the number of casualties to increase dramatically, as they are to be redeployed from Kaboul toward the east, in the Kapisa and Surobi bases, thus forming a new brigade. If I remember correctly, they’ve decided to name it – not even joking – Brigade Dragon .

                  Was that serious enough to suit your tastes ?

                  • Tonton Barbouze says:

                    Errr, sorry about that :

                    The name of this brigade to be is actually Brigade La Fayette (Marie-Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, marquis de La Fayette, rings any bell ?) with its HQ in Kapisa’s FOB, in Nijrab. This redeployment will allow the doubling of the number of combat troops.

                    I also forgot a number of 150 gendarmes (military personnel with police power) serving in the Police Organisationnal Liaison and Mentoring Teams.

          • PO2 Thbbpppp says:

            They also participate in personnel exchanges with other country’s military. I’m in the Navy, and for a while I was working for a Master Corporal in the Canadian Army. Makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it?

        • gwenhyfar says:

          Canadian military is in Afghanistan now, there are volunteers in Africa, we were in Bosnia (just to name a few of the places that people I know personally have been within the past 10 years)

        • 8bithero says:

          They were in Khandahar with me in 2001-2002. Some of them were killed when a US plane bombed them during an exercise. Lost some Canuck friends that day.

        • A_Lad_Insane says:

          Linked, for your perusal.. I was going to say something nasty, but I choose to think that you actually ARE genuinely curious.. since American media would seem to not be too interested in things that don’t feature their own in a starring role.

        • Beachbumsdn says:

          I believe the longest confirmed sniper kill was by a Canadian in Operation Anaconda. Just over a mile and a half

  3. Haven’t we already established that these guys are Canadian? :???:

    • I thought so.. I’d be more afraid of the SAS than these two guys.

      • HI says:

        Actually since the onset of the first world war Canadian troups have been one of the most inventive and succesful soldiers in the world. The average Canadian Infantry man has better training in many combat aspects than a US army ranger. They just have less funding than other armies.

        • Yeah, but it would be over in less time it takes to say, “Eh?”

        • wicket says:

          nOO. I’m was thinking something more along the lines of NINJA WARRIOR, the Japanese TV show.

        • Daniel says:

          …. why would you want to see the logistical branch of the US armed forces? I mean really, you might as well compare them with USPS.

          I do believe they did have a special forces (or at least, a scout/sniper) competition a while back. it wasn’t very well televised, but I do believe the only reason why the canadian team lost to a USMC recon team was that they didn’t practice with a .50 cal rifle. granted,

  4. Kn0wledge1 says:

    Thats cause America rules :D

  5. I’m trying to figure out if there’s some kind of hidden agenda on PK lately. Anyone that knows me will know that I support the military, but seriously, we are getting an overabunance of military lols, just like we had with the firefighters and cats.

    Besides, the captioner fails on so many levels. We don’t mount guns on just anything without properly verifying it will do the job. Now, Somalia is a different story.

  6. Andy says:

    These guys are Canadian. That photo was taken at my regiment (before I got there though).

  7. radiosucks2002 says:

    These are Canucks… are they RCH?

  8. No1askedme says:

    Stop posting this pic please :\

  9. Bix Nood says:

    It’s like a 21 century battle chariot!

  10. wtfshark says:

    Those aran’t Americans, and this picture has already been used for a joke about the Canadian, and I think also the French armies. This is epic fail and whoever made it should feel bad about themselves.

  11. PFCHOOD says:

    HOOAH!!

  12. Dope says:

    American arrogance and stupidity, if it has a soldier in it he must be a yank… oh, and the best, and the smartest, and if you think this is true, ask the 56,000 dead American boys in veit nam and the 40,000 dead Iraqi civilians… hows that for smart… the world is far safer without your help

    • ay dios mio says:

      And the moment we don’t run in we get blasted for not caring.
      It’s lonely at the top.

    • the_original_shortright says:

      i see you named yourself appropriately. thanks for making it easier on the rest of us.

      • Dope says:

        I’m not trying to make it easy for you, the problem that Americans in general seem to have, and I do know a lot, is that they are very poorly led. There are times when it’s right to say no, (even if this is seen as un patriotic, a “crime” worse that murder!) and I think you’ve collectively made another mistake with your president, we will wait and see, but I think you will find him to be a lightweight, much to your cost.

        • brak says:

          And where, pray tell, might you be broadcasting from?

            • No1askedme says:

              France: land of cheese, the Louvre, and french bread. There’s a country I can really get behind!

            • Doogie says:

              France- where the National Motto is ” Run Away! Run Away! Help America, Help!”

              • the_original_shortright says:

                usually i think you’re a troll and i just want to pretend your comments don’t exist. but this one got an honest laugh out of me. nicely done.

              • HI says:

                Actually they used to call on the Brits. (WWII)

              • Yelp says:

                Wait, let me open my history book at the chapter on WWII.

                - The USA did not get in the war to help France, or Britain, or any other country but to avenge he attack on Pearl Harbor. Helping those countries was collateral bonus (like collateral damage, except this time it’s good).

                - On D-Day, the French Résistance saved American asses by destroying supply lines (bridges, railways, etc.) which prevented the Germans to bring tanks, large number of troops and extra weapons and ammo to the front.
                All the efforts to land foot on the beaches of Normandy would had been vain without the Résistance.
                Did I mention the Résistance was composed mostly of civilians? That’s what I call a badass country.

                The French are not bad militarily, in fact they are doing a fairly good job in Afghanistan. They just have a different philosophy than the USA and they think killing is hardly excusable.
                While the USA waged a war against Afghanistan and Iraq that killed 200’000 civilians in retaliation for the killings of 3’000 civilians in 9/11, the French would probably take less drastic measures to stop Al Qaeda and risk a second terrorist attack.
                It may be less patriotic, but the world would be a better place if more countries had the same philosophy.

                • bitterclown says:

                  Again? The US did not kill any amount of civilians in “retaliation” for any attacks. They were there to stop the terrorists and that is all, the terrorists that sometimes hide in civilian populations. By doing that they kept untold thousands of innocents safer from continued attacks from Alquada and other terrorist.

                  • Yelp says:

                    They kept untold thousands of innocents safer? Please.
                    - 9/11 caused the death of 3000 American civilians.
                    - Somewhere between 100’000 and 200’000 civilians have died somehow because of the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan (and I don’t care which side shot them here). The exact number is hard to come by so to keep it simple I will keep the number at 150’000 dead civilians.

                    It’s not like the Taliban killed hundreds of people every day in their own country. And at a rate of 3000 deaths per terrorist attack, 50 attacks would be required to kill as many people as civilians killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
                    And there is no telling how many more civilians will die before this war is over.

                    So far there has been only one attack in the USA, so it’s not an easy thing to organize. At this rate it would take Al Qaeda a few centuries to kill 150’000 civilians.

                    Face it, the Bush administration just decided 1 American life was worth at least 30 to 60 Iraqi/Afghan lives. And they could has easily done a better job at protecting civilian casualties.

                    I will also point out only somewhere between 4000 and 5000 American soldiers have died, which is a handful compared to the number of civilian casualties, and as much as I respect what these soldiers do I wonder if perhaps there is not some disregard for civilian safety in combat.

                    In the USA, cops abandon car chases if they feel the guy they are chasing poses a threat of causing a deadly accident.
                    In case of a hostage situation, they attempt to negotiate with the hostage takers before storming in the building and risking the execution of hostages.
                    It seems the philosophy of “saving innocent first, shooting bad guys later” does not apply to Iraqis and Afghans.
                    How you can explain such a disproportionate level of civilian casualties except by disregard for civilian safety is beyond me.

                    And yes, if you do something knowing your actions will indirectly cause such dramatic consequences you are responsible.

                    • ubr says:

                      “So far there has been only one attack in the USA, so it’s not an easy thing to organize. At this rate it would take Al Qaeda a few centuries to kill 150′000 civilians.”

                      did you ever think that the reason why there have not been any more attacks is because we invaded iraq and afghanistan?

                      as for civilian safety in combat… the enemy combatants in iraq and afghanistan repeatedly use civilians as human shields for their operations and yet you still think that it is the us soldiers who have no regard for innocent life…

                      in short, your hatred of the iraq and afghan war plus your hatred of us troops has blinded you to what is actually happening in the real world. remove your bias and look at the facts with open eyes.

                      • Harry says:

                        as for civilian safety in combat… the enemy combatants in iraq and afghanistan repeatedly use civilians as human shields for their operations and yet you still think that it is the us soldiers who have no regard for innocent life…

                        I rather think indiscriminate use of cruise missiles in the opening days/nights of the conflict lead to thousands of civilian deaths, and that it’s the US who have no regard for innocent life.

                • Care Troll says:

                  why does that number never stay the same?

                • Care Troll says:

                  So you want to compare militia’s not actual military forces?
                  If you were to let the american people loose with out the constraints of the Geneva convention and with out any real control. I’d be afraid of the circumstances. I’m a patriot, I love my country, but we have some real nuts in here. The truth of the matter is France declared war on Germany after the invasion of Poland. To quote French General Gamelin France had”inferiority of numbers, inferiority of equipment, inferiority of methods” Then in less than a year the french government formally surrendered. With their backs to the wall and nowhere to go the french resistance was formed.

                  • Yelp says:

                    The French government did not surrender, the general at the head of the French military did it and was labeled a traitor for it. It was not the decision of the French president.

                    Otherwise, I should probably use what you said about the Geneva convention to argue that France has better standards than some Americans.

                    Look, I was just trying to remind a few people here that the French are not as bad fighters as what they seem to think. I never wanted it to be a contest of who’s the toughest between France and the USA.
                    The Résistance, a French guerrilla mostly composed of civilians, were brave, efficient at fighting the Germans in their own ways, and they played an important role when the USA, Canada, and other countries invaded Normandy.

                    I never said the USA were not good fighters or were worse fighters than France, I just reminded people here of the merit of some French fighters.
                    I feel people here got offended because I dared say France fighters were not complete useless cowards. Apparently some people take it as an insult if you say the US military is not the ONLY good military in the world. My apologies.

                    • ubr says:

                      so… the vichy french was just a figment of our imagination?
                      revisionist historians always make me laugh…

                      as for the french in military endeavors…
                      indochina – loss
                      algeria – loss
                      ww2 – loss
                      ww1 – barely squeaked a win with a lot of help
                      franco-prussian war – loss
                      napoleon’s russian campaign – loss

                      • Yelp says:

                        Did I say the Vichy French did not exist?
                        The Vichy Government (that’s how it’s called in France) did exist, but was far from having the support of the majority of French people and is not considered a legitimate government by France.

                        Just picture it as a bunch of renegades who proclaimed themselves as the representatives of France while the majority of the population was actually against them.
                        And again, the Vichy government does not erase the actions of the Résistance.

                        You may also want to consider Napoleon’s many victories, not just his defeat against Russia.

                        You really seem to be thinking any defeat erases every past victory. I’ll have you know the USA did not meet only victories either.

                        I also hate to bring this up, but since you want to dig further in the past I will remind you France helped the USA against England in the War of Independence.

                        I don’t know why you want to bring France down so much. It seems like you just can’t stand that France may have had any good fighters in it’s history.

                        • Yelp says:

                          Read my post a little bit lower about the Vichy Government for details.

                        • ubr says:

                          nope, i just can’t stand when people revise history to fit their ideology.

                          napoleon’s victories were 200 years ago. and he was forced to live the rest of his life on an island prison.
                          and waterloo. don’t forget waterloo.

                          as for french fighters, i’m sure that some of the soldiers are brave and honorable men, but the history of the french army does not give them much to back up that claim.

                          as far as i’m concerned the only good french military unit in the last hundred years is the foreign legion which is not really made of french soldiers… (well, roughly a quarter are french citizens…)

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Agincourt – loss
                        Crecy – loss
                        Poitiers – loss
                        Blenheim – loss
                        Waterloo – loss
                        Trafalgar – loss
                        Just sayin’, is all

                • Doogie says:

                  Yet the Vichy French fired on Allied soldiers and sided with the Nazis. Care to explain that one Yelp?

                  • Yelp says:

                    The Vichy government was created after General Pétain surrendered and made a deal with the Germans, trespassing the authority of the president of France.

                    France was pretty much divided, and some sided with the Vichy government. Many did not like it and some decided to keep up the fighting against the Germans (The Résistance).

                    After the war, those who helped the Germans got in a lot of trouble. Some were legally prosecuted, but most of the time civilians took matters in their own hands and simply killed the traitors.

                    • Yelp says:

                      (Hit “add comment” by mistake)

                      You can’t judge France on the actions of the minority who were part of the Vichy government. Not to mention the fact these people later became labeled as traitors…

                      You probably would not like it if someone said U.S. soldiers are all war criminals because some of them raped a girl and killed her family in Iraq. You would argue these actions were condemned by the military and are the independent actions of a few who do not represent American soldiers. And I would agree with you.

                      Sorry, but the Vichy government is not France. France considers this government as an act of treason.

                      I should add the actions of this government do not erase the actions of the Résistance.
                      Anyway my point was that the French are not as bad as some people here make them seem. I did not even say they were better than American soldiers, I just said they had merit too.
                      But it seems some people here consider it an insult to imply not all countries are crap.

                      You guys are THAT pissed at France just for not going to Iraq? Explains a lot…

                      (And I’m not French by the way).

              • Isildo says:

                Haha… You said “Run Away” and the song from Spamalot started playing in my head. Most fun I’ve had all day.

                Run away! Run Away!
                Run away from the stench and the trenchies!
                Run away! Run Away!
                From these horrible, nasty old Frenchies!
                These frogs and their terrible prattle, are fighting a battle with cattle!
                We’re all full of fear so let’s get out of here!
                Run away, run away, run away!

            • ubr says:

              you’re from france? did you have to learn german when you were growing up? you didn’t? oh yeah, thanks to us yanks you didn’t have to…

            • brak says:

              Now how did I know that?

            • LMAO!!! What the phuck would France know about military operations, at ANY level?

    • PFCHOOD says:

      and what happens when you topple a dictator who was gassing his people (kurds) and you leave. the insurgents fill in the void killing all in their way. then im pretty sure u would b watching the tv screen going y didnt anyone help. im leaving for iraq in 3 months. if i do i thing to save one life and i die, its worth it. have a heart.

      • Dope says:

        PFCHood, I wish you well, I had the “pleasure” of taking part in both Golf 1 and 2, all I can say to you is trust the men to your right and your left, fight for them, and keep your head down, God Bless you

        • Care Troll says:

          You can chalk this up to “dumb American” but when exactly did Gulf war 2 take place? I’m assuming that gulf war 1 you were part of was the 6 month conflict from 1990 to 1991, AKA Desert Storm.

    • If you are indeed from France, don’t ever, ever, ever bring up Vietnam (btw, it’s one word you fscktard) again. Do you realize that had France not colonized Vietnam, we probably never would have had a Vietnam conflict?

      • brak says:

        They bailed on it leaving us stuck with the stinking mess. Thanks fer that one too, mon amis.

        • Rando the Floydist says:

          “Ah hell. Now what? I know, America will clean it up. They’ll take on anything.”

        • Ng says:

          France didn’t bail out, they got crushed at Dien Bien Phu, same as you guys got truely stuffed at Saigon, hey, and nobody asked you to come here and make problems, so don’t just pick on French, we stuffed the Brits and Japs too, read your history books

    • grifkiller64 says:

      THANK YOU

  13. Michael says:

    These guys are Canadian, but lets get some trivia going. Where is the US, Canada and Mexico? America!

  14. lewisifer says:

    this pic sucks balls. what will it take for them to stop repeatedly posting it with a new, even more retarded caption each time?

  15. Mina says:

    Fail on at least two different levels.

    1. Not even American Soldiers. I know that a lot of people (ignorant people) say we should annex Canada and be done with it, but since that hasn’t actually happened, stop trying to claim their soldiers.

    2. If this WERE Americans, then how is this in ANY way a compliment to our troops? Just because some of us embrace the “stupid redneck” sterotype doesn’t mean we all do. And I know this site doesn’t have to be “complimentary” pics of our military, but that does seem to be the theme this week…

    • ubr says:

      service personnel having a good time is not a “stupid redneck” stereotype. obviously the only stereotypes existing in this conversation are ours. good day.

      • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

        Someone else also pointed out that Canada is in North America. Even if they’re Canadian, they’re still Americans…. it’s never truly specified.

        • Mina says:

          And someone else pointed out what the reaction would likely be if you called a Canadian an American to their face. Decidedly not pleasent.

    • keithybabes says:

      Everyone has a go at the Americans because they’re big and powerful. Or the British because they WERE big and powerful. Taking the piss out of Canada is like mocking the weak: it’s just not the done thing. You want to start worrying when people start being nice to you…

  16. gplongwood says:

    Funny! Not that it matters, but they’re not US soldiers

  17. Jon says:

    “… how is this in ANY way a compliment to our troops?”

    Wait … what? Are you saying that the only captions allowed
    are those that compliment the subject of the picture? Or are
    soldiers (or TROOPS) special – like Speical Schools? – and
    need extra care and protection?

    I can only say, mina, that you are the epitomy of COMMENT FAIL!!1!

    • ay dios mio says:

      Reply FAIL

      • Doogie says:

        Go back to Kate and your kids, Jon….

        • ay dios mio says:

          What?

          • Rando the Floydist says:

            I think it’s a nesting fail, ay dios mio. I think he was making fun of Cpt. British Flag there that you responded to as well.

            • Jon says:

              Yeah, mine was a nesting fail too.
              *shrug* happens sometimes. Mea culpa,
              blah blah.

              WRT to some of the comments further
              downstream, sorry, but I really don’t
              understand the notion that soldiers
              (sailors, airmen) are somehow above
              having the mickey taken out of them.
              For goodness sakes, the soldiers in
              the above pic are taking the mickey
              out of *themselves*. The caption just
              plays off their own efforts.

              If we’re going to say that volunteers
              for public service are beyond reproach
              or humour, then we’ve just ruled
              politicians off limits. Surely that
              can’t be right, hmmm?

              • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                I’m not entirely sure anyone was arguing that fact. From personal experience I would have to say Ay dios mio, and Rando would agree with you. They were just merely pointing out the nesting failure in your reply is all.

    • No1askedme says:

      Although I disagree with the war and I understand that they signed up for the military themselves, I don’t see a need to bash the soldiers. Sure they fought in a pointless war, but it was beyond their control, hell, I have a cousin in the NAVY and he got shipped out to Iraq. He didn’t die or anything but come on, this country’s military leaders must be insane or something! If anything, we should pity them, war isn’t fun.

      • Rando the Floydist says:

        I just found out via Facebook that my cousin was just sent Kuwait as an army doctor. I had no idea he was even in the military.

      • Rando the Floydist says:

        Oh, and I agree with you. We shouldn’t bash the soldiers. We should take them away from a war that does nothing to defend the USA so they can be safe. If you signed up prepared to die for your country that’s one thing. But what are these guys dying for? :(

        • Rando the Floydist says:

          Yeah. I hope they understand that most of us support them, but we don’t like the war they’re fighting. Our misgivings aren’t about them.

      • HI says:

        War isn’t fun, and most soldiers become soldiers to defend their country. They have to go where their Country sends them. I’d love to live in a peaceful world, but given human nature that is a pipe dream.

  18. Aah, the USA… A magical place where the dumbest people in the world try to survive with the horrible health conditions, loads of debt and they still think their country kicks ass. Well, the guys in the photo killed 1,5 million Muslims and FAILed to change the Middle East maps. This photo could have been published at FailBlog with a caption “U.S. Army Fail” :D

  19. Me says:

    FYI: Look at the uniform, those are CANADIAN soldiers!

  20. CAF says:

    CANADIAN, THEY ARE CANADIAN!!!

  21. HI says:

    Umm, except the soldiers in that picture are Canadian!

  22. Cosman246 says:

    Shows us how bloodthirsty this nation can be. (T_T)

  23. mulaz says:

    I wanna see what happens when the road starts going uphill :D

  24. gmc360 says:

    Canada ftw!

  25. charro the Floydist says:

    ZOMG I BET NO ONE BUT ME HAS SAID THIS, ESPECIALLY NOT REPEATEDLY THROUGH THE ENTIRE LOL BUT THOSE SOLDIERS ARE CANADIAN NOT AMERICAN!!!11ELEBENTY11!!3.14159!!!

  26. alex says:

    Hey man, give Canuck soldiers some credit… they get no funding yet still manage to keep thousands of men fighting in combat missions in Afghanistan. On top of that, the concept of a storm trooper came from Canadians in the Great War (German planes used to actually look for Canadian troops…. more than 2 units in one area, and they new there was an attack coming). They also fielded the largest percentage of their population of any nation on Earth in WW2 (over 1 million men from a country of just over 10 million).

    For a brief moment, in 1945, Canada shone in glory as the 4th most powerful nation on Earth :D .

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      Now they’d just be happy if they could win a damn Stanley Cup. (Which is coming to St. Louis this year, hell yeah!)

    • Wait a second, I’ll buy underfunded, but NO funding? How the hell do they afford to buy weapons and stuff? I know it isn’t with their good looks.

    • For a brief moment, in 1945, Canada shone in glory as the 4th most powerful nation on Earth.

      When was that? Oh wait, let me guess.. 11:13 am on the 13th of September?

      • alex says:

        After the second world war, with the utter destruction of the militaries of Germany, France, Italy, Japan, China (stuck in a civil war still at that point), Canada had the fourth largest army… beat by the Russians with the largest, then the Americans and Brits. Within a few months though the Canadian army had been mostly demobilized so that didn’t stay the case for long.

  27. Asuna says:

    Is the economy that bad up in canada that the military has to use these as their “hummers?”

    • paws4thot says:

      Neutron emission is a type of radioactive decay of atoms containing excess neutrons, in which a neutron is simply ejected from the nucleus. Two examples of isotopes which emit neutrons are helium-5 and beryllium-13. However, the decay of helium-5 is also (by definition) a case of alpha-decay.

      Many heavy isotopes, most notably californium-252, emit neutrons among the products of a different radioactive decay process, spontaneous fission.

      Neutrons are absorbed and emitted in the process of nuclear fission, a nuclear chain reaction propagated by neutrons. Delayed neutrons emitted by neutron-rich fission products aid control of nuclear reactors by making reactivity change much slower than it would be for prompt neutrons alone.

  28. dave says:

    These are Canadian Soldiers.
    What does Canada do? We have done pretty much MOST of the work in Afghanistan so far.

    you know, the war that actually meant something but has now spiralled back into a dump.

    It doesn’t surprise me that an American doesn’t know what the rest fo the world does though. IN fact, it’s sadly become all too typical. I blame your propaganda spouting mainstream media.

    • Ivan The Floydist says:

      Wow, now even the Canadians are becoming dicks? I thought you guys were more passive aggressive.

    • Rohvannyn says:

      What a coincidence, I blame the media too! We should go have a beer.

    • Lolnathan says:

      If America sucks so bad why does your entire country live along our border? Go up north, jackass.

    • No1askedme says:

      Yeah, as an American, I can tell you that the mainstream news isn’t even worth watching for information anymore, other than the weather. It is pretty funny to switch between FOX and ABC while they are covering the same topic though, if I didn’t know better I’d think they were trying to out-crazy each other, if that’s really the case tough, FOX wins hands down.

  29. mike says:

    The two in the picture are tankers, more specifically they are Royal Canadian Dragoons. I know this because i was one for 15 years and i know the 2 goofballs in the picture. This is what happens when soldiers get bored. You should see what we did with an old golf cart one time.

  30. guyman says:

    you guys are dumb they’re clearly Nigerian soldiers

  31. JunkPileQueen says:

    I hate to point it out again (I’m sure others already have) But, those soldiers are Canadians. Check the ‘relish’ coloured camo pattern- thoses are members of the Canadian Forces.

    • I hate to point out that you are lacking in situational awareness. If you had bothered to read through the other posts above your’s, you would have noticed that this was addressed over and over and over. You fail at spotting the obvioius.

  32. Rohvannyn says:

    In this case I don’t really care who they are, or from what country, I just think it’s really cute!

  33. Ex Soldier says:

    Those are NOT US soldiers. Those cammies are that of European or British troop. No they’re not Green Beret’s, jakkass!

  34. Alex says:

    Sorry to piss on your parade, but those are Canadians, ’cause last week I mounted a turret on my tricycle.

  35. robyroxit says:

    Wow. I didn’t realize this one had made it to this list. I’m pretty surprised.

    My mistake for incorrectly identifying the nationality of the soldiers, but it still pretty funny isn’t it?

    When I made this one, it was strictly tongue in cheek. No disrespect to our troops, this or that side of the border. I don’t have to like why you’re fighting or where you’re fighting, I just wish you all safe homecomings.

  36. robyroxit says:

    One other thing… that buggy’s wheels are damn near flat. That’s gotta be some heavy pedaling.

  37. Anonymous says:

    If those are Canadian soldiers, why are they wearing M81 U.S. Woodland camo pattern http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodland_(camouflage)
    and not CADPAT camo?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CADPAT

  38. MKO says:

    Errr, I’m no expert, but those are Canadian combat fatigues…. We call it CadPat. Helps that I get to wander around in a set of em now and then.

    • keithybabes says:

      Well I’ll be damned. 70000 comments on this subject and nobody has spotted the Canadian angle!!!. I wonder if there’s a special set if combat fatigues for cowards called CowPat? I’d wear that.

  39. keithybabes says:

    Tries desperately to attach a lol.

  40. robyroxit says:

    hahahhah after reading your comment, I searched and found yours.

    Sorry dude, no plagurism intended. I dunno about everyone else, but I can’t view existing captions till I submit one.

    Wish that weren’t the case.

  41. frecklejuice says:

    They’re not Americans Dumbass! grrr

  42. Dan says:

    Guess it should say, “North American Ingenuity”

  43. Daboatstain says:

    Gawd Dang Zipper Heads (as Armoured troops are called in Canada) You must have had a couple of screws knocked loose riding around in a metal can having a 105 mm Gun fire feet from your head……..

    Anybody else notice that the picture is reversed The lettering on the building is backwards. Although they do do things strange at PET.

  44. Owain says:

    American ingenuity, shame their Canadian……nice work sparkplug !!!!

  45. sweven the great! says:

    roflamo…hi ppl

  46. bailey says:

    there not american troops :L

  47. mike says:

    those arent even americans

  48. Tony says:

    hm, except for the fact that the men in the picture are british. i totally agree with that statement

  49. Dr. Phil Layshiio says:

    FAIL

  50. Yukon Jack says:

    Canadian not American

  51. kristin says:

    I realize that anyone who didn’t start out as a Marine will always find a way to try to be one but this is taking the prase adapt and overcome a little too far….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up