Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


Release your inner dork.



michelle and barack obama

Release your inner dork. Even the President does it.
They grow old, girls, but never up. [sigh]

(Michelle and Barack Obama)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: hanschka via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 665 comments

  1. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    Awesome pic.

      • Justacarolinian says:

        All the way home?

      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

        I am glad you have seen better pics. I think we can all agree this isn’t the best picture ever taken, but that doesn’t make it less awesome.

        • Justacarolinian says:

          You mean boring?

        • Justacarolinian says:

          Or staged?

          • VictoryNotVengeance says:

            I mean “awesome”. President with a lightsaber is full of WIN. Sorry any photo of him wouln’t have met your approval, but I would have even thought a photo of any other presidents with a lightsaber would be awesome. I guess fun is only fun if Obama is not having it? God knows we saw enough Bush at the dynasty ranch.

            • paws4thot says:

              That’s why it’s awesome; he’s managing to have fun with a kid’s toy, and still look more like a major political figure than John Major ever did.

            • Justacarolinian says:

              It would be awesome, if there were not so many of the ahwwwwwwwwwwww type photos being put out. Even your favorite pizza gets old after the 10,000th slice. Staged is staged. KFC will never be better than Momma’s chicken.

              • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                How many photos of a president with a lightsaber have you seen? Its my first. So… its still awesome. Now if I see him with a lightsaber in every pic for a few weeks, it will still be awesome, but at least I will see where you are coming from.

                • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                  And I love Momma’s chicken.

                • Justacarolinian says:

                  It’s not the lightsaber, but rather the ahwwwwww that they keep cramming down everyone’s throat. Genuine is fine, but fake is boring. Even Bill Clinton gets tired of bimbos, oh wait. He doesn’t.
                  Yeah, Momma’s chicken, good. KFC, fake and old. Momma’s was made with love, KFC was made with spit and whatever else some minimum wage worker threw in. But hey, it looks nice…..

                  • mothergoose says:

                    I see your point; but, you have to admit, no matter what Obama does, what pictures are taken, what he says from this point forward; at least we can all agree that he WAS right when he said Kanye was a jackass!! ;-)

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      Eating briars by the fence. Pooping elderberries. Oh, I already used that one.
                      I knew that about Kanye for some time now. He reminds me of the reprobate minds in the Bible. That and the natural brute beast….

                  • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                    Well at least you see the obvious problem with low wage labor and how it leads to inadequate products. If the shareholders of KFC would take a pay cut and pay those workers at the shop more, they might take more pride in their chicken preperation, and therefore make it more comparible to momma’s.

                    On the other hand, unless you have some more pictures lying around with a President weilding a lightsaber, this pic is still awesome. And it doesn’t look fake or staged. It looks like someone playing with his family. I assume…. you have had experiances like that? Admittingly, you aren’t in the lime light like Obama is, but that doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be able to go outside and pretend to be a Jedi every once in a while.

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      I have plenty of experiences like that. I am a big kid with my children. But I don’t use them to pretend I’m harmless.
                      Now if we could just get you to see the dangers of Big Govt.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        My goal is not big government. My goal is the withering away of the state. Complete difference.

                        • Justacarolinian says:

                          Complete anarchy. *sigh* I bet you are one of those “Down with Capitalists” protesters using Wal Mart sheets…..

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Anarchy and withering away are two completely different things. Anarchy is what happens when you just up and dissolve a governenment. Withering away as where you use legistlation to bring the classes closer together so that everyone is effectivly middle class. The “government” then just becomes and organization to regulate trade of goods. Over time ot withers away. No anarchy where I am going.

                        • I don’t mean this rude or sarcastic, but you don’t make sense. Withering away of the state in one reply, big Federal Govt in another……..

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Its a process known as withering away of the state. it begins with the socialist overthrow of a current government which is replaced by the dictatorship of the proletariat. (Big government) Over time as the big government is converted from being high paying positions of privilege, to workers wage paying trade distibutors, as well as the elite being regulated so that they are middle class and the workers from the lower class being lifted to a position of middle class, the state (of government) will no longer be necessary and will wither away. Anyway… confusing mouthful I know…. but its a process.

                        • Sorry, but any time there is a big govt, someone will take advantage of it. Your withered govt will get some rain and become that kudzu beside the highways.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I do agree with you there. Someone will take advantage of it. Thats why when it occurs, you have to have the -right- people to make it happen.

                        • You have to have people who stick to the idea of individual freedom, responsibility, and not interfering with the rights of others.
                          Now to get you to see that minimum wage job might not be so minimum if the corp weren’t stuck with reducing wages to because of the fraud of corp taxes. Corporations do pay taxes, consumers do.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          The “corp” isn’t stuck reducing wages. They do it on purpose so that they can maintain a heafty profit for those rich enough to invest at the very top.

                        • But they DON’T pay taxes. Yes, there are some rich at the top, and a lot of poor investors too.
                          I guess you idea is that no one should be rich, no matter if they earned it or not.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I believe people can earn the right to a fair and even above average living. I do not believe that there is any amount of work that should enable someone to be “rich”. Baseball contacts for millions, movie deals for millions, CEO payoffs in the millions. These things are not “earned”. They are either given or taken. And I know that many Americans feel they have to let the rich stay rich because they have thise warped sense that they too can be rich, and that makes it ok. It also helps Americans ok with the idea that if they are doing better than someone else, its because they earned it and those beneath them are dumb or lazy. Since I think all of the above is false other than some of the middle class earning their middleclassness, then i dismiss the idea of the “millionare” and the “billionare” as being those who have manipulated the money flow to their advantage. I saw that those who have had the money taken from them, sgould fix the glitch in the system, and funnel all their actual hard earned money back away from the born into wealth of so many citizens, or paid celebrities, or those who jjust happen to shoot to unlimited wealth because of an “invention” that should ahve been used to help mankind.

                        • Hitler thought he was the -right people- to make it happen…..

                        • Rando the Floydist says:

                          Godwin Godwin GOOOOOOOOODWIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNN!!!11!!11evelenty!!!

                        • charro the Floydist says:

                          KHAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!1

                        • randman83 says:

                          Well, vnv, you were on the right track, but you sort of…warped it. Yes, people who are dishonest and take advantage of others, be they government, CEO’s, cheating welfare recipients, drug dealers or used car salesmen, should be recognized as such and be stripped of any wealth they accumulated through dishonest tactics (or drawn and quartered). But there are people, more than you might think, who honestly earned their wealth without taking advantage of people. You point to “manipulated the money flow to their advantage.” Let’s say, for example, the I invest in a small business. The owner wants my investment, and I agree to give it to him under certain terms. If both parties agree to the terms, how is that manipulative? If we both haggle and negotiate into a deal where we both benefit, that is a deal that can not be considered wrong, since those terms are to the benefit of those involved. All others not involved have no right to that money since they did not take the financial risk.

                          Now, the obvious exceptions to this are, as is usually the case, people who are dishonest and seek to take advantage of others. If someone enters into a contract that is meant to lull the other party into a trap, then that person does not deserve the money he makes, because his financial risk is just an imaginary facade. We saw this as commonplace with insurance companies with intentionally ambiguous contracts that really do not benefit anyone. You know who else has employed this tactic? The drafters of almost any bill that has passed through congress in the last two decades (a kind estimate). The real problem is that our congress is filled with professional politicians, not thinkers. If we were to elect representatives who weren’t out to pull one over on people by making it so only they know how to interpret law, we would not be in some of the major predicaments. We need more people who think in terms of actual, practical consequences, not talking points.

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      By the way, I used to be a member of Starfleet, and took tickets for theaters in a Monster Maroon (Star Trek II uniform) when they had Trek movie releases. I know all about releasing the inner dork. Thankfully, I let it all hang out years ago……

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        Now see? And if that picture was online, i would have most likely called it awesome too.

                        • And I lived it up too. But I wasn’t in the public spotlight trying to make people think I’m Joe Average. I knew I was a dork, and the only thing on my mind was setting the phaser to stun with a certain red head in my charter.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          You lost me somewhere. I don’t see how you being a Starfleet cadet is cool, but the president playign with a lightsaber is him trying to sell and image. Seems like they are both innocent fun to me.

                        • One of us was a teenager, one of us was President. One of us was trying to impress the band camp geek, the other trying to fool the nation into thinking he is Joe Average. What do you think of my video?

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I haven’t watched the video yet. It will probably have to wait till i get home from work. I don’t know why Obama need to fool anyone. We didn’t vote him in because he was Joe Average. That was the Bush/McCain tactic and it led us to either years of suck, and one hellashiously bad campaign. I think he was elected because of the speaking ability, and his “smarter than Joe Average” ways. I know thats why I voted for him. Because Joe Average has no business in the white house. But if he wants to play with a lightsaber, that makes him even more Joe Above Average to me!

                        • Obama won because Bush was the most liberal conservative in history, other than security. And most Republicans were questionable about Iraq at that.
                          Add in McCain was/is such a weak candidate. The media orgasam over a man’s skin color instead of judging him by his character. And just for good measure, throw in the fact that Obama is going to pay my mortgage and fill up my gas tank, and you have 4 years of Comrade Kommisar.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I think that if you asked most people who actually voted for Obama, thats not the answer they would give. I think its just the answer the republicans like to give so they can sleep at night.

                        • If you asked them it would be “Hope—-Change——Change——-Hope——–Pay my mortgage——–Free healthcare——Yes we can———–Brains——”

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I still get the impression that you are making these things up. I think change and brains are a big part, because we definately need change and we need it from people with brains. But i think you are just making like of a huge portion of the populations thinking process. I mean, Obama won pretty big. Surely you aren’t chalking up that large of a block of the public to only be concerned as what they perceived as free?

                        • Oh, you mean Karl Rove and I plotted and hired Pixar to make that video on Youtube? The one with the woman telling us Obama was going to pay her mortgage?

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I don’t know, did you plot and hire the rednecks from Utah that said that Obama was going to allow “the blacks to take over” and that he was a terrorist? Did you hire people to go to rallies and chant kill him? I figured not. But I hope this does go to show that there are idiots on both sides of the fence. You have to skip those people and talk to the majority, which I hope is smarter than both your and my example.

                        • Never said there were not idiots on both sides of the fences. But rather you deny that there IS another side of the fence…..

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Oh I see the other side of the fence. It just ain’t greener. In fact, its poluted, filled with poverty, racism, and corporate greed. Stayin’ on my side thanks.

                        • From where most of us sit, your side of the fence is full of sh…..er, poop. With lots of briars and elderberries.

                        • charro the Floydist says:

                          OH MY GOD! Are you two SERIOUS?! This is SO BORING! *throws pie*

                        • Rando the Floydist says:

                          Yeah, these two had way too much time on their hands today. I didn’t count all of them, but I think they combined for somewhere near 14,000 posts today. Very prolific.

                        • charro the Floydist says:

                          Cataclysmic and prolific
                          In the age of super boredom
                          Hype and mediocrity
                          Celebrate relentlessness
                          Menace to society

                    • Semperfidd says:

                      By shareholders do you mean all the middle class people that have YUM brands Inc. (KFC Parent Company) in their 401k or just the rich ones?

                      Here is some more information on the company you want to punish for being so bad.

                      For the past four years, the company has been recognized as one of Fortune Magazine’s “Top 50 Employers for Minorities.” It also has been recognized as one of the “Top 50 Employers for Women” by Fortune, one of the “40 Best Companies for Diversity” by Black Enterprise Magazine for the past two years and one of Black Enterprise’s “30 Hottest Franchises for 2006,” one of the “Corporate 100 Companies Providing Opportunities for Hispanics” by Hispanic Magazine, one of the “Top 50 Corporations for Supplier Diversity” by Hispanic Trends Magazine and by BusinessWeek as one of the “Top 15 Companies for In-Kind Corporate Philanthropy.”

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        First of all…. “Furtune Magazine”?
                        Then… top 50? Doesn’t that just about include all the major corporations running around the USA about now? And by shareholders I mean the guys with the majority of the stock that sit on the board collecting money. Not the people frying chicken for 7.50 an hour and have part of their pay deducted to buy stock for their wonderful company.

                        • Semperfidd says:

                          Individual stockholders only make up 23% of the total stocks available. The rest is held by mutual funds etc

                      • Semperfidd says:

                        VNV. Here is some more terrible stuff that KFC does.

                        Since the World Hunger Relief launched in 2007, more than one million of the Company’s employees, franchisees and their families have volunteered more than nine million hours to aid hunger relief efforts in communities worldwide. The effort has raised $36 million for the WFP and other hunger relief organizations and is helping to provide approximately 160 million meals and save the lives of about 4 million people in remote corners of the world, where hunger is the most prevalent.

                        At the Clinton Global Initiative last year, Yum! Brands pledged to do the following over the next few years: raise and donate at least $80 million to help WFP and others provide 200 million meals for hungry school children in developing countries; donate 20 million hours of hunger relief volunteer service in the communities in which it operates; donate $200 million worth of its prepared food to hunger agencies in the United States and use the Company’s marketing clout to generate awareness of the hunger problem, and convince others to become part of the solution.

                        Yum! and its brands have been committed to fighting hunger for more than a decade by donating more than $46 million of prepared food annually to the underprivileged in the United States. Since the company went public in 1997, it has donated more than $500 million of its food to hunger relief agencies in the U.S

                        The gall of those corporate meanies.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Who is doing the volunteering? The people dropping the chicken? or the corporate execs? I wonder how much Yum makes in profit every year? Want to toss those numbers up there for us?

                        • I know. Shame on them. And their chicken just ain’t touching Momma’s home cooked. Oh, my. Now I need a screen for my keyboard. Drooling all over it.
                          Green beans, mashed taters, cole slaw, corn on the cob, cathead biscuits.

                        • VNV, you are just a jealous fool. Shame on you.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Why am I jealous? I don’t want anything that they have. Was Robin Hood jealous? Not that I am implying that I am Robin Hood, although I would love to be. The point is, just because someone wants to take the money from the rich and give it to the poor doesn’t make then jealous. Sometimes it makes them a hero.

                        • Semperfidd says:

                          Don’t forget VNV. Most of the people making money from this corporate bad guy are also paying taxes both federal and state that help the poor. You are basically a communist/socialist ass who thinks he is right (or should I say left) about everything. I will not waste anymore time with you. Get rid of all the wealth in this country and see where that gets you. Good luck

                        • Robin Hood? You are demented. Got some sort of God complex yourself.
                          Psssssst. Robin Hood is fictional. And it’s not your business what other people earn.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          And your policy would be? Insults to those who have ideas? Whats that next law that should be passed? Got any plans? Whats world’s number 1 problem?

                        • Oh, no, no. You have all the ideas on how to fix/rule the world. And you are jealous. That wealth you want to spread doesn’t get thrown in the trash. You would benefit from it too.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          So you are saying you have no ideas or policy? Any? Just words? Just… a couple of insults? No… actualy plan? Just…. mine is bad yours is better but yours is…..? Not a thing?

                        • Yes, I have ideas. Come to my local school board meeting and I’ll share some of them with you. Or when County Council meets. But you have no business in the voting booth with me.
                          Give up your childish attempt at painting me as empty minded, or implying that everyone has ideas that they want forced on others.

                        • randman83 says:

                          VNV, your lack of respect for humanity astounds me. If you want to help the poor, it’s probably a bad idea to completely disregard their right to own property.

                          And btw, justacarolinian, Robin Hood was real, but he didn’t steal from the rich and give to the poor. He stole from the government and gave back to the people who had been wronged. If you just steal from one group and give to another, there really is no point in having a society, since your future is stolen from you and put in the hands of bureaucrats and thieves.

              • Rando the Floydist says:

                Don’t knock KFC. I luvs me some KFC. *stomach growls*

            • Shisno says:

              More awesome: he’s making the lightsaber noises.

    • AngelMax says:

      Agreed. This picture is really cute. And given the reactions of Michelle and the kids, I don’t think it need any captioning.

  2. Justacarolinian says:

    Michele is actually using the Jedi mind trick on him….

  3. Guts says:

    The force is strong on this one. He might be…

    “The Chosen One”

  4. Annie says:

    Obama isn’t dorky, Star Wars is now cool.

  5. Wazzit says:

    ” Don’t worry Poland! I’ll protect you from missles with my light saber!”. ( cue video of fat guy swinging stick around like light saber on YouTube)

    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

      Poland didn’t have a chance either way….

      • wallFly says:

        poland never does.. after all, whaddaya expect from a nation who put screen doors on a submarine. they were dooomed!!!

        • mothergoose says:

          Did you hear about the Polish National Outdoor Ice Hockey Team?

          -Drowned in Spring Training.

          • What makes it so bad is that the French team dove in to save them, but gave up and surrendered.

            • VictoryNotVengeance says:

              And we came in and dropped a few A-bombs and then called it freedom!

              • Is that why the French women have such hairy pits?

                • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                  Never thought of it that way…

                  • Maybe all that firebombing is why the Japanese aren’t so hairy? (My wife is Japanese, at least half.)
                    So how would you have ended it? Bombing with Otis Spunkmyer Muffins till they were so full they couldn’t fight?

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      How would I have ended it? So… for this example… how far back to get I to put myself and still be in charge? Because… if I was in power, it would have never been necessary. We would have stopped fascist advances with the Spanish Civil War. Doubt Hitler would have been so froggy after that. I think the Japanese would have felt the same way.

                      • I guess you would have nuked Hitler then, since we would have had the bomb, you being so all knowing…… either way, stopping it was a serious thing. I tend to think you would have been declaring “Peace in our time.”

                        • Did you have the A-bomb already when Franco did Spain? I don’t know the exact dates when the first bomb was manufactured.

                        • You missed where I said he would of had it because of his great all knowing intelligence.

                        • No, I didn’t miss it, i was just wondering when the first bomb was made. I could’ve googled it up, but I was too lazy.

                        • July 16, 1945 was the first successful test.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          No A-bomb when Franco started a military coop with fascists equipment and troops to overthrow a democratically elected goverment. And second, No, I wouldn’t have dropped any a-bomb. But I would have sent backup for the American troops that volunteered to go, instead of trying to ban them from helping. I would have also convinced the rest of Europe that fascism was the enemy, and we could have combined stopped Franco’s takeover. There were a couple of times the Republic could have won. We just refused to help.

                        • So, I guess you think the Atomic bombings were worse than the fire bombings? Or how about the V-1 / V-2?
                          What about the ear mound? Or Manchuria 1931?
                          Sir, War is hell. Period. The cost effectiveness of a weapon doesn’t make it any more or less evil. Dead is like pregnant, you either are or are not.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          No. I think that letting a war break out over Europe so you can sell guns to both sides and then only jumping in at the end because your “innocence” was attacked is thw worst thing. War is hell, yes. Using war to make profit? Even more hell worthy.

                        • You sir, are demented if you think we waited till 41 to get involved so we could sell weapons. I bet Rev Wright would look at you and say “What?”

                        • slaggingham says:

                          I’d go back in time and shoot Marx and Engles. No radical Communists = No radical anti-communists = some 100-million lives saved from BOTH genocidal philosophies.

                          You know, as Sci-Fi fans, we should take note that VNV’s beliefs have already found their ultimate expression in the Sci-Fi world… there’s a whole culture in Star Trek TNG that completely adheres to Communistic philosophy…

                          The BORG.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Funny you should say that, because in Star Trek TNG, Starfleet was basically communist. They didn’t believe in money. They weren’t paid. Replicators made it so there was no want, no poverty. The worked solely for self improvement. So in the Star Trek universe… the ultimate hope for Humanity was communist. I am not sure the Borg could be considered any of the isms we have today. Technically the Borg was just 1 entity with multiple personifications. Communists are individual people, just individuals working for common goals. Like the crew of the Enterprise.

                        • Yes, there was money in Star Trek. Many places. That story line changed from time to time. Often referred to as credits.
                          Individual expression in Communism? But comrade, I don’t want to be shot for not paying party dies!

                        • slaggingham says:

                          The Federation bears as much resemblance to Communism (in theory or practice) as I do to Winona Ryder.
                          That is, absolutely none.
                          Federation has money (credits.)

                          The Federation philosphy was “technology unchained,” which is something neither Right nor Left seems to be comfortable with.

                          But if anybody ever keeps us from achieving that level, it will be the Earth-bound Leftist types, who even now argue that we shouldn’t be spending money (even the pitiful amount we do spend) on developing space while there are social problems and poverty on Earth.

                          Failing to see, of course, that the main reason that there is no poverty in the Star Trek universe is that its predecessors went all out in the exploration and development of space’s vast resources.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          No surprisingly, you are confusing communism with Soviet Russia. And the money in Star Trek was definately not Starfleet. We are still waiting on that policy btw, whenever you are ready. I would love some of this “ideas” hidden behind those pointless insults.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Well hi Wynonna! I had no idea you were here! I seem to remember in First Contact when that lady asked how everything was paid for Picard said “we don’t hve money in the 24th century”. Maybe I was wrong, and god knows I wish I had time to go look through 2 millions fan quotes to find all the episodes dedicated to human greed (capitalism) being replaced.

                        • slaggingham says:

                          The only way you could ever have Star Trek-style, or any style, of communism without the oppression that has ALWAYS accompanied it so far is if you eliminate its main flaw, and take steps to ameliorate its secondary flaw:

                          Flaw 1: Scarce resources. Now, space has infinite resources, or as near as doesn’t matter. You don’t need to fight over energy when you can get all you need from harnessing your sun’s abundant output for the next 5 billion years. You don’t need to fight over mineral wealth whne every asteroid 1km in diameter holds 2 trillion dollars worth of metals, and there are hundreds of thousands of them.

                          Of course, the second problem with Humanity is that people aren’t angels, they’re PEOPLE. There are only two ways around this: 1 Remove drive, greed, ambition, and all other human attributes that cause conflict differences from the equation – in other words, Be the BORG, or 2: Give your misfits breathing room and other worlds to go to.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          So, wynonna, it looks like what you are saying is that all of the old worlds problems were caused by greed an poverty? And they solved it by finding the unlimited resources in space. So what If I were to tell you that if we divided up resources the right way, we wouldn’t even need to explore the vast regions of spce to make it happen?

                        • slaggingham says:

                          I’d tell you what I always tell people who give me that argument:

                          1. Your math is way way wayyy off.
                          2. But only by decreasing the standard of living for many people. That will never fly. MY way, on the other hand, can give that same outrageous wealth to everybody.

                          Solve the technological problems first, and the distribution problems will wither away a hgell of a lot faster.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I completely agree that we need to develope our technology. It really is the answer. But… how do we do that in a peaceful direction? Thats the real trick. We are too nusy waring on our puny rock that we will never make it into space.

                        • slaggingham says:

                          Maybe somebody actually has to WIN first.

                          You know, some of us CAN cooperate, we’ve done a fair job with the International Space Station.

                          It’s just that we’re not currently willing to keep that up. We’ve cut our space budgets to the bone and beyond.

                          First, they gave the money to the military to win Vietnam. We all know how epicly that failed.

                          Then they gave the money to the Left to end poverty. Still waiting on that one, too.

                          I say give the money back to NASA, and to the public sector, use it to build an orbiting solar power station (the first of many.) Once we’re using the sun’s power for electricity, we’ll use much less oil (source of conflict eliminated), pollute less (source of conflict eliminated), and generally be able to tell the Middle East what to go do with itself.

                          More later… I’ve just been called to a meeting. Big brains.

                        • Rando the Floydist says:

                          Please tell me you guys aren’t arguing if a fictional universe is communist or not.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          It didn’t seem nearly embarassing a few minutes ago…..

                        • It’s ok, Rando, my head just asploded over all the back and forth that’s going nowhere. So I’m not surprised that the debate transitioned to the fictional. These words come to mind:

                          He’s a real nowhere man,
                          Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
                          Making all his nowhere plans
                          for nobody.

                          I’m in for a KFC run though!

                        • Rando the Floydist says:

                          I heard that, Ed! Into the squad car! I can hear the original recipe calling to me already.

                        • We’re rollin’.. they’re hatin’

                        • charro the Floydist says:

                          OH MY GOD! Are you guys SERIOUSLY arguing about Star Trek’s applications in the real world?! I have Star Trek tattoos and even I’M bored! *goes back to throwing pies*

                    • Japanese aren’t hairy? You must be kidding!

          • wallFly says:

            ok, since we got off topic of polish jokes, i got a serious question.

            i heard this joke a ways back and can’t remember all of it: it’s something like if you’re russian when you’re going into the bacthroom and you’re _______ when you come out, what are you when you’re in the bathroom? (the “______” part is what I can never remember)

            • Oscar the Mild says:

              Actually, I think its from a joke this guy in pub drew on a napkin about a brothel. The guy going in is ‘Russian’, the guy leaving is __”Finnish”__ and the guy in the helicopter hovering over the brothel is “Irish”

            • Ivan The Floydist says:

              When you’re going in, you’re “Russian”, when you’re coming out you’re “Finnish” and while you’re in there, “European”. It was so stupid it made itself a place in my mental Rolodex, and I CAN’T GET IT OUT! *whimper*

  6. paws4thot says:

    Robert Ross, this is not the presidential residence you are looking for.

  7. Keri says:

    It looks like he’s making the lightsaber sound with his mouth.

  8. The Steve says:

    Anyone who can’t have fun with a lightsaber doesn’t know how to have a good time.

  9. LolIJustMadeThisNameUp says:

    Normally we’d have to photoshop to get a picture like this.

  10. scrape says:

    Psheeeewwwwww. Vwooooooooonnn.

    • Wazzit says:

      (Protecting the Female Wookie and it’s offspring)

      • Wazzit says:

        What a filthy little troll- your mom needs to whoop your ass good!

        • Justacarolinian says:

          Leave him alone. He wrist is sore from circle jerking. In his universe, humor is only funny if it makes fun of the right.

          • Wazzit says:

            Is that why he only uses his left hand?

          • VictoryNotVengeance says:

            But thats so easy to do…. its not really even considered humor anymore… its just saying how it is. Most of the time it comes with tears… because of how sad it really is.

            • Justacarolinian says:

              You are an ass if you don’t think both the left and the right are worth making fun of. A blind old ass eating briars along the fence.

              • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                I make fun of the democrats and the republicans if thats what you mean. I only wish we had a left in this country to make fun of. Both of our parties are two sides of the same right winged coin.

                • paws4thot says:

                  Likewise, but it’s easier to make fun when the others make fun with you, which is partly why I tend towards the liberal most of the time (I have very right-wing views on some issues, but please not Afghanistan, because I said that was a mistake when we first went in).

                  • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                    I think where the line is drawn with most people is that the have a “conservative morality”. They “don’t believe in sleeping around”, or “believe that abortion is last resort”, or “thinks drugs are bad.” That kind of stuff. Tese beliefs aren’t just “right wing” ideals. The only problem is when trying to legislate these things. Many of the main issues confronted by people are those that say “vote for me so I can camke a law that agrees with you” when in reality, no law is even necessary. If someone wants to sleep around, thats their business. Not mine, and although I have a conservative morality, I know I can’t legislate against someone else because thats taking away one of their freedoms. Moral implicatons should be left to individuals and upon individual circumstance, and not just widely rules against.

                    So if we leave out the morality and stick to the fiscal side of things, I tend not just toward “liberal” but way past it. The caste stystem has been in use on the planet for centuries, and although we have had advances, its always been to help the elites, and only when its second hand to them does it help anyone else. I think the age of “trickle down” economics is at an end, and things must be done, even drastic if necessary, to get things back in order.

                    Which is one of the reasons I can’t be “pro-democrac” although I like them much more the the republicans. Because I think the system is broken, no amount of voting, or no choice of candidates will ever be good enough. Anything that is produced by a broken machine will also be broken. What we need is a new machine.

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      The Constitution states the we have the right to replace out Government. I agree with you there. The machine is broken.
                      The only thing conservative about me is the belief that we should stick with the Constitution, including enumerated powers and such…. If you want the state of Vermont to become the Communist heart of America, GO FOR IT. So long as you don’t impede the rights of others, or force other states to live your way. That way, if one state screws it up, people leave.
                      Keep the Federal Govt out of as much as is possible.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        You can’t make any place be communist. You can only attempt to make them socialist. Communism only exists once the state withers away.

                        I think that having the states as individuals is great, but I definately believe in a strong federal government, at least while it lasts. I also believe that following one document, or book, or written word as any undenyable truth is foolishness. It leaves too much to interpretation.

                        And I also believe that once a government has been bought out by business instead of public interest, which ours has, it is up to the people to stand up for themselves and overthrow said government. The time has come for “prosperity” to not simply mean “profit”.

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        Glad to see you admit that Communism is the final result of Socialism.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        Communism is no garuntee, no matter how long you may or may not be socialist.

                      • Neither is anarchy, other than a complete collapse of civil society. Think about the old American west. The link under my name is a video I think you will enjoy!

                    • paws4thot says:

                      I’d say “no law because no law is necessary” is libertarian rather than liberal (and legislating personal morality is always in that area).

                • Justacarolinian says:

                  Eating briars and poopin elderberries. And only on the left side of the pasture.

                • Semperfidd says:

                  I think you need to live in another country if you fail to see that America has a left side.

                  • The ole gray mule ain’t what he used to be……

                  • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                    you would have said that about me either way, but I still stand that “left of the right” is not “left enough”

                    • No problem with that. But keep it in YOUR state. If those members of your state get tired of you, they will change as needed. And if you are the next Glorious Leader, then they will tell everyone how well you have run your state.

                      But as for me, I like this private ownership, I want to be left alone. Let te govt run it’s business, and let me run my own.

                      Think of it this way. Would you want some Bible thumping “Vote Jesus for president” leader to amend the Constitution and force everyone to become Baptists?
                      Neither do I. And don’t think it can never happen.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        But… the whole Republican party runs on the ticket you said you would avoid. And I don’t plan on limiting the spread of equality to just my state or even my country. When it happens, its going global.

                      • First, I’m no republican. You made that mistake before.
                        Second, it’s scary this world vision you have. Damn if you ain’t another Hitler/Mussolini/Tojo. Going to cover the 8 corners of the world with “Your” vision of what is correct for everyone.
                        And no, not everyone of faith is the “Jesus for president” type. Go eat some more briars.

                      • Look at you divert and not answer. No, it’s not scare tactics are us. You have said in more than one reply today how “YOU” have the ultimate answer to ALL the world’s problems, and how the entire WORLD should be run the way YOU want it to be.
                        And some things ARE bad. But even those things that are bad don’t belong under Federal law, and there is fair debate if they belong under state or local law. The idea is for everyone to be free to pursue happiness, so long as they don’t impede or interfere with the rights of others.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        In fact, you are the only one claimin I have all the answers Carolinian, and I have this feeling you are so claiming because in the past it has been a tactic used to simply shut people up. “If I can shout loud enough that this guy thinks he is the only one then i can turn everyone against him.” Its a lower form of tactic, and its not going to work on me. I think that my ideas are just fine. I also think I am not alone in thinking them. I just think that there are less of me spending time writing it here.

                        And I complete agree that everyone should be able to pursue happiness but the point you are missing is that these corporations -are- infringing on others. The ship over seas for slave wages, they buy off governenments so they can pollute the earth. They constantly research subliminal advertising so that they can advertise directly to our brain. They brag about how cost effective they are, and how poor the government is run when they have to try and regulate to clean up the mess. The idea is to make sure that those powers that start to grow exponetially grow with specific controls so they do not get out of control and only answer to a profit margin.

                      • Shut people up? Like you accusing me of scare tactics?
                        Dude, go back and read what you wrote today.
                        The control over ANY company is people, not govt. Govt will always fail you. Always.
                        You talked about your plan, and how it would take over the world. Just in this thread…..

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        If by “my plan” you mean my hopes of seeing poverty eliminated and if by “the world” you mean the spread of equality globally then you are right. “People” do not control anything unless they are willing to step forward and control it. We have been controlled for far too long.

                        And yes, I am accusing you of whatever it is you want to call it when you don’t give any answers to any problems and just say things like “you are the next Glorious Leader” and “think you should rule the world ” and “converted him from his 8 corners of the world vision”. Because although all those things might have been intended to paint me in a bad light, none of them really said anything. So, although I don’t think you are making anyone afraid, you aren’t making any of the problems I am discussing any better. If you wrote a paragraph stating what the top 5 biggest world problems were and how you would fix them, I would read it, comment, and do what I could to add. I certainly would not use your tactics. So… call it what you will…. but… its no way to be constructive.

                      • I mean how you seem to think you are the only one who has the answers to it. Your plan, it being that and all.
                        Do you know the definition of Utopia?
                        You keep spouting YOUR plan. That is not me scaring people. Get over it.
                        All I have said is that we need to stick with the original idea of America. Individual freedom. Not anarchy, but each community taking care of itself and when necessary lending a hand to others. But not by the rule of law.

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        You admitted things were wrong. Admitting things needed to be fixed. And so the way to do that is in…. keeping the way things were? Thats what got us here. I want to know what you plan to do to make em right! If you were in a position to make some policy, what would it be? Nostalgia of the good ol days that never were doesn’t count. Come on man. Now you have me interested. Name your top five “worlds worst problems” and a sentence or two as to hoe you would fix them? Please… give us something!

                      • charro the Floydist says:

                        *turns the hose on* You two quit fighting! It’s time for dinner!

          • Rando the Floydist says:

            Calling Michelle Obama a wookiee is “humor?” Well, it’s good to see you back to your original jackass persona, JAC. And the circle jerk comment was totally uncalled for.

        • paws4thot says:

          pointless –
          1. a. – Having no point; blunt; wanting keenness; obtuse; as, a pointless sword; a pointless remark.

          2. adjective – Lacking meaning; senseless.

          3. adjective – Ineffectual

        • It was just a Star Wars joke. I think you are implying too much. Maybe I missed something, but it didn’t come across to me as anything more than a joke.

          • the_original_shortright says:

            it seemed like there was more to it to me as well. and i’m not saying that just because i like ivan… i’m saying it because i thought he was being incredibly racist when i read it the first time. however, i don’t know why i’m defending myself and ivan to you, because you think VERY little of ivan and i’m sure will continue to do so no matter what.

            • Not at all. I think Ivan is fine, just thought he went overboard on this one. To be honest, I took the wookiee thing to be left over from yesterday. I haven’t read a lot of Wazzit, so he may be a racist twit. But in the pure Star Wars sense, I thought it was funny. Not any different than Cheney being Emperor Palpatine or Limbaugh as Jabba the Hutt.
              Ah, what the heck, some one give me a thermal detonator!

              • Ivan The Floydist says:

                Trust us, Wazzit is a racist twit.

                • wallFly says:

                  yar, even if you don’t want to go with the racist approach on that, the use of “it” as opposed to “her” is dehumanizing her (perhaps that’s not the right word, but it’s close), which is pretty insulting in and of itself

                • Ivan The Floydist says:

                  One more thing, I’ve seen you around, and although you and I are on opposite sides of the fence, you seem to be moderately respectful when responding to others, and you make reasonable, thoughtful comments. (shortright and I are political opposites, but we are VERY close friends, so you see us disagree, but in the friendliest way. I wouldn’t say anything to hurt her for the world). However, you seem to be associating closely to this Wazzit, and he is already earning a reputation as a nasty, mean little troll. Be careful his bad reputation doesn’t rub off on you. Actually, that’s what my comment on the other thread was implying…that you are becoming a troll by association for agreeing with his nasty comments. I was feeling a bit pissy yesterday, so it came off meaner than I intended. I apologize for that.

                  • the_original_shortright says:

                    if we’re such close friends you should join the PK facebook group so we can stalk each other in real life! ;)

                    but as for the rest of it – i totally agree. siding with someone (even if it’s only for a moment) who is showing themselves to be a giant ass will tarnish your reputation round these parts. we’ve had some good debates, justacarolinian, but yesterday and today you’ve seemed a little off kilter.

                  • No apologies necessary. And I may not be so far on the other side of the pasture as you think, just that the pasture needs a few fences to keep one bull from dominating all us cows.
                    I think I also mistook you for Igor. My bad.
                    I’m a contractor, and one of my biggest clients bit the dust, and while they might not die before it’s over, I have had to move on to greener pastures. And that pasture don’t let me in the gate till next Monday, so I have been sitting here all day bored, and may have missed a thing or two.
                    Let it be known throughout Cheesyland. This Carolina man has no love for racists. I am also of the firm belief (from the Bible) that you can disagree as far as east is to west, and still respect and love a man. Though I will admit that some are testing that doctrine today.

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      Oh please let me guess? A christian man that believes that some desearve to live wealthy lives while its ok for some to starve? As long as its not in your state right? -Very- christ-like.

                    • the_original_shortright says:

                      VNV, everyone is playing nice over here. how ’bout you go piss in someone else’s corn flakes? haven’t you pissed off justa enough today??

                    • Yeah, Christ believed that. Shows me that you know little of the Bible, or chose to pervert it to your fantasy sim city world.
                      You don’t work, you don’t eat. Look it up.

                    • Shortright, that man couldn’t piss me off if his life depended on it. In the oh so elegant words of Forrest Gump, stupid is as stupid does.
                      I choose not to empower people like him to insult me. Yeah, they can be noisy at times, but so are farts.

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      shortround, I have no yet begun to piss in your corn flakes, and if I have, then eat em up good buddie! yummy!

                    • the_original_shortright says:

                      i don’t eat cornflakes. good effort though. *2 thumbs up to VNV*

                      however, trying to demean me by calling me the name of one of indiana jones’ best sidekicks is actually pretty funny. shortround was awesome.

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      Well good then. Because I happen to love me some Indiana Jones, so … it really wasn’t as hurtful as one might think. And the only reason I brought up corn flakes is because you did. And I didn’t know I pissed off that many people today? JustaCarolinian. lol! And really? Does that count? Isn’t it still like 1962 there? (the part about the year was a joke. my family is from GA, where its still 1952)

                  • Wazzit says:

                    Ah- the old too-often-played=race=card! To borrow Justa’s comment- even Reverend Wright is looking at you and saying “Nigga, Please!”. What a pathetic little masturbating twit you are Ivan.

                    • Ivan The Floydist says:

                      Oh we should be so lucky!

                      Notice how he’s trying to draw Justacarolinian back into his thrall. Keeps quoting him and such. Just sad. Hopefully Justa is too smart (and civilized) for that.

                    • Rando the Floydist says:

                      Heh. So tell us more about what you think about black people, Wazzit. You have my attention.

                    • wallFly says:

                      i could do to hear more about this random fellow. what’s the story there?

                    • the_original_shortright says:

                      wallFly – random was a troll who had obviously been reading the site for a while. he knew information about rando and bitter troll’s lives… things that were quite painful and personal to them. when he got into arguments with them he’d just throw those sorts of things into the argument in order to hurt touchy spots. he fought with EVERYONE on the site, not just the regulars. he was rude, he was crude, he was probably the one person that EVERYONE agreed was a troll and needed to go away.

                      after about 3 days of him being a total ass to people and frankly being WAY over the line his posts just disappeared. people have been banned before (their IP is no longer allowed to comment) but we hadn’t seen comments completely removed by the admins. what we found looking back through the LOLs from the time he was around… everything about him was removed. not just the rude and crude stuff. everything.

                      this was probably about 6 weeks ago.

                    • wallFly says:

                      thanks original – didn’t know the admin’s could/would do that.

                      i’m guessing he was here when i was, just must have (fortunately it sounds) missed him

                    • Rando the Floydist says:

                      I’m starting to wonder if Random found a way around it and is looking to bug us again.

                    • the_original_shortright says:

                      rando – i was wondering that too… made me a bit unhappy.

                    • Yah, not falling for that. And that wasn’t the context I was using earlier.
                      Ivan, I have some water ballons and a pickup, how about we do a drive by? And if it gets serious, we can rely on BT with the .50 in the back.

                    • wallFly says:

                      where there’s an internet, there’s a way

                    • bitter troll says:

                      bitter troll will use his bitter chainsaw-nods-

                    • Can we use the recoil on the .50 for propulsion? GET SOME…GET SOME…..
                      How can you shoot women and children? Easy, you just don’t lead them as far….

                    • Sheesh says:

                      Ivan and Rando are obviously racists. I bet you were against Sotomayor, wern’t you?

                    • Ivan The Floydist says:

                      Actually no. I supported her. Can someone PLEASE show me ANY statement either of us made to deserve this troll calling us racist? Come on, put up or shut up. If you can’t prove your accusations, you are a troll.

                    • Rando the Floydist says:

                      Actually, Ivan. It’s true. I’m…I’m so ashamed of my racism. You see, I hate white people. A lot. Fvckin’ crackers. *shakes fist at the sky*

          • Ivan The Floydist says:

            Let me help you figure this out. When you imply that the first family are “wookies” you are the one trying to insinuate that they are animals. When I read your snarky little racist haha, I infer what you’re saying, ie that the Obama women are animals. So to reiterate; imply – what the statement maker does, infer – what the reader does.

            I hate having to school these children. Next thing you know, one of them will try to use the word “irregardless”. *shudder*

        • Ivan The Floydist says:

          FYI Wazzit, my mother died 2 years ago.

  11. ElbieSee says:

    Are Star Wars fans dorks or geeks? Or nerds?

    All of the above?

  12. Meowth says:

    We all knew Obama was a a Jedi. That is part of the reason we voted for him!

    • Wazzit says:

      More like Darth Maul……..

      • Justacarolinian says:

        Would be an improvement…..

        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

          I so wish I could see him doing one of those crazy front slips and lopping someone belonging to the Bush dynasty in half. Anyone, really. Wouldn’t matter.

          • Justacarolinian says:

            That’s ok. He failed…….to.

            • Justacarolinian says:

              Make that *too* 2 years with this laptop, and I can’t type on it worth a poot. My next one will have a real keyboard. *sigh*

          • Semperfidd says:

            Thought you were against violence?

            • VictoryNotVengeance says:

              Not CGI, scifi movie violence. I make exceptions for things that aren’t in real life.

                • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                  It usually causes more problems than it solves.

                  • No way! Violence is a primum mobile of mankind.

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      I would rather move slowly, and violence free. And I still believe it causes more problems than it solves.

                      • But it’s inevitable, so best thing to do is to perfection it!

                      • wallFly says:

                        ok, violence usually begets violence, but you gotta admit, sometimes it sovles some things pretty qucik. just needs to be done right, is all. and, it’s not appropriate in all situations, so it comes down to the circumstance and what the circumstance necessitates for a conclusion that’s to the betterment of.. well.. me. :)

                        • violence needs no appropriate situations or circumstances, it just IS!
                          Cool title for an abstract painting: Violence is!

                        • Danbala says:

                          Violence is often only a quick term and temporary solution.

                          (So, I just agreee with VNV, I guess, as usual. :p )

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          How can I be the only bad guy if you are agreeing with me Danbala! Geez….

                        • wallFly says:

                          true, often temporary, but then again, everything is. personally, i’m not violent (outside of world of warcraft) and i usually would prefer to find an alternate means to an end than a “kill ‘em all!!” approach but… there’s sometimes where someone means to hurt ya and the only thing left to do is whack em with a stick, ya know?

                        • wallFly says:

                          sorry, i think today i’m just in the ramblin mood, i coulda shortened that to… “yah, you make a good point”

                        • slaggingham says:

                          I think violence did a pretty good job in determining, permanently, whether the dominant Mediterranean culture would be Roman or Carthaginian…

                          whether the Western Hemisphere would remain the playground of European monarchies (See: Bolivar & Washington, among others)…

                          whether or not Slavery would continue in the Us South, and/or whether the states’ rights had primacy over federal authority…

                          and whether Fascism would become the dominant European governmental style.

                          Among other things.

                        • Danbala says:

                          VNV: “How can I be the only bad guy if you are agreeing with me Danbala! Geez….”

                          Oh! Sorry – didn’t mean to step on your domain! I’ll keep agreeing in silence instead? ;)

                        • Rando the Floydist says:

                          You’re right, slaggingham. Trying to work out problems is stoopid. Let’s just kill each other over everything. Geez, do you EVER say anything worthwhile? If not, please continue your joy of violence against yourself. *grumble*

                        • My ideal as far as use of force goes (whether as an individual or a nation) is that we should strive to act comparably to (I’m probably reeeaally dating myself here!) Caine in the Kung Fu tv series or Billy Jack. Try to be nonviolent, don’t start anything, warn people if they try to start something with you or pick on the innocent, but if they don’t desist, you need to be prepared to kick some ass.

                        • Violence is natural, just like war is, nothing wrong with that.

                      • But in your judgment, everyone else is wrong. Who the hell are you to think you should rule the world and choose right and wrong for all of us.
                        You are worse than the “Jesus for president” types. At least they think someone with a sound mind will come, where as you think YOU are that sound mind.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I never said I was the guy who was going to fix everything. I may be waiting for the same leader as those religious types. I think the sound minds are already here. All over the planet. I think they are thinking and growing. I think those sound minds will one day stand up for what they believe is right. I will, of course, do what I can to help them. But… in your judgement… isn’t everyone who isn’t agreeing with you wrong? I am wrong because of that I think. Obama is wrong for having a light saber. Only you are right when you post a youtube video? I think the people on this website can argue over who is right and wrong until they are blue in the face. I just post ideas. Agree with them or not. I don’t care. But I will do what I can to poke wholes in what i see are bad ideas like “god bless america and no place else”. Its my duty as a good citizen to call it like I see it.

                        • You sure did. You laid out the plan, all about how it would be this way, and with -the right people- in charge. You point out how everyone is wrong, but your vision is right.
                          And no, not one single person has to agree with me. And thats the beauty of it all. So long as I don’t impede on you, or others, I can be as smart or dumb as I choose.
                          This conversation has long left Obama’s posing with the saber.
                          And believe it or not, most people actually want God Bless the World, not just America. Though some of them don’t, and even more think that many need a change first. Gosh, even you think America needs a change before it can be blessed.

                        • Meowth says:

                          I’m not saying that I agree with everything VNV says, but I do agree that violence is not the answer.

                        • @Meowth
                          Just so you know, I don’t think violence is the answer. But I am wise enough to know that it happens, and if you are the weaker, or without protection, you will be the victim. And sometimes it also requires someone stronger than the original aggressor to root him out. I tell you, I look forward to a world where there will be no violence.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          And your the policy you would enstate to ensure that violence does one day go away is…? Anything? Policy….? Changes…? Just one?

                        • How about speaking out against idiots, errr, people who think THEY have all the answers and will fix all the world problems if THEY can create this massive world commune.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Speak out all you want, but know this: Unless somebody does it, it will never get done.

                        • @Meowth. I agree. But speaking is the first place to start. And violence should be the last, but often is not.

                        • Meowth says:

                          What I mean is that if you speak out against every person who has ideas about nonviolent solutions, which you imply is your plan about two or three posts up, you will be speaking out against some people whose plans are good, sound, and likely to work. Of course, one person speaking out against them will not undermine their plans, but it is not likely to help them much, either.

                        • @Meowth. Not speaking out valid solutions at all. Just those who seem to think they have the utopian plan to solve all the world’s problems.

                        • Look at nature: Full of violence.
                          Look at history: Full of violence.
                          Look at the Disney Channel: Don’t look at the Disney channel.
                          Violence is nothing but natural and we’ll never live without it.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Just because violence exists does not mean it is automatically the solution to all problems, especially when there are peaceful alternatives that work a lot better.

                        • Peaceful solutions that work a lot better for whom?

                        • paws4thot says:

                          People who don’t have violence done unto them, as a general rule.

                        • …and as long as it’s the better solution for other people, it will never cease to exist. Even our so-called “democracies” can’t change that might equals right for those who possess it or who want to posess it.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Violence is never a better solution. Some people just refuse to see that.

                        • Disagreed! For those who use violence successfully it actually is the better solution: brings more power, more wealth, on a larger scale, more territory, etc etc.

                        • Meowth says:

                          And yet it all falls apart when someone turns that violence against you. Tell me, can it really be a permanent solution when it only works for a very short time?

                        • A very short time? That’s relative.
                          Europe, the way it now exists, has been built over centuries, mainly on violence.
                          The United States have been built on violence, from the beginning, by taking the native american’s land, etc etc. History repeats over and over, and it will always involve violence.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Which is why it isn’t the solution. We must learn from our past mistakes and break the cycle of violence. The only way to achieve the goal of breaking the cycle of violence is through nonviolent means. There is no possible way violence could be the answer to that.

                        • There’s people to whom, the “past mistakes” you’re refering to, are not mistakes at all, since they made a profit out of them. Would the US even exist today, without violence?

                        • Meowth says:

                          Without violence, religion, and repression, it wouldn’t have needed to.

        • charro the Floydist says:

          Mmmmm Darth Maul…

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      I thought he was Superman?

  13. ocentertainment says:

    Man, shut up Michelle! Lightsabres are cool at any age!

  14. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    Looks like he is saying ” Shhh…. I sense a great disturbance in the force.”

  15. deadinfrance says:

    This is one great picture-you go Mr. President!

  16. Gia says:

    He has the same type of lightsaber that I do….it lights up, and makes a cool “whrrr” sound…but mine’s red.

  17. RiderLeangle says:

    It’s blue?
    You mean you can be president and still have to be a Jedi Apprentice?
    Damn.. Those Jedi are strict to let people be a Jedi Knight

    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

      He was too old. They like em younglings.

    • The Steve says:

      *prepars to show inner geek*

      The color of the lightsaber has nothing to do with the skill of the jedi. Obi Wan had a blue lightsaber and he was a Jedi Master. Luke’s was green, and he was an apprentice. Yoda’s was also green, to match his skin of course, yet he was also a master.

      Samuel L. Jackson had a purple lightsaber in the new movie. It probably had “Bad Mother-Fu(ker” inscribed on the handle…or should have.

      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

        Ready for a real geek responce?

        The color actually has to do with the type of crystal used inside the chamber of the hilt. According to KotOR lore, the color of the crystal was often chosen by the type of jedi weilding it. Some jedi’s are better a physical combat, some are better at force powers like force push, and some are better at meditation and seeing the future. Depending on where you focus your abilities, many times dictated what color crystal you would look for to construct your first saber.

        • So what is the difference between NCC 1701 and 1701A?

        • wallFly says:

          VnV – you’re sort of right depending on what you’re going by. The crystal used did change the color but it wasn’t until the games Knights of the Old Republic that they were associated with Guardian or what not. In the movies, the Jedi weilded blue or green (and one purple one), whereas in the games there were also orange / yello such as with Plo Koon (who had a blue one I think in Episode II).

          Not much mention has been said in the books conerning this either (Though I’ve only read the Thrawn Trilogy and the first two books of the new Fate of the Jedi series, Outcast and Omen (Outcast was way better than Omen, btw)).

          I’m not sure what’s canon, but my bet would be to go with the movies.

          • VictoryNotVengeance says:

            The movies definately get presidence. But its still fun to think about all the posibilities and the “why”. Plus, even in KotOR, if you wanted to change your crystal color you could. So.. in the end… it may just be a fashion statement.

          • wallFly says:

            blargh, i just saw where you referred to it as “According to KotOR lore”

            in other words, my prev. post was pure redundency (except for the bit about Omen, author didn’t do a good job sticking with Star Wars lore)

          • VNV right? *GASP THE HORRORS* Oh, you mean he was correct in saying things about the sabers. For a moment there I though someone had converted him from his 8 corners of the world vision.

            • VictoryNotVengeance says:

              Well at least I am not a terrorist secret Muslim baby killer like JustaCarolinian! See? When I use cliche terms for attempted maximum effect, it looks dumb too. Not just when you do it.

              • But no where have I ever talked about converting to islam, or controlling by terror. But you did talk about your world vision and how you would implement it.
                Keep reaching in the dark……

                • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                  There is is again. You think this is some kind of scial movement of 1? I am just sharing my personal ideas, but I am not the only on that thinks them. You like to pretend I do because if gives you leverage to argue without saying anything.

                  • I don’t need leverage. You have said enough today to tell everyone where you stand.
                    Some of your ideas are fine. On a local level, or as a personal choice. But not in the federal govt, and certainly not a world govt level.

                    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                      And the beautiful part is that you are welcome to your opinion. And when you post some carolinian policy, which we haven’t yet seen, then I will tell you what I think about that.

                      • I’ve posted plenty. Let the people rule themselves. Individual freedom. Enumerated Federal powers. Anything not listed is for the States to do.
                        Something you don’t seem to be familiar with.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          But you don’t seem to be saying anything. Freedom! Yeah… Braveheart said that. We get it. States rights! Yeah… we heard that one quite a bit before the Civil War. What I am asking, is how do you think we solve the problems facing the world? You just seem to have concepts that can’t clearly be defined, or you just don’t have any “ideas”.

                        • Are you that ignorant on purpose?

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          I almost thought you were going to write something substancial there. Oh well..

                        • Well, I don’t know. I stated that I am for the Constitution of the United States of America. That people should be free to pursue life as they choose, so much as that doesn’t interfere with others. I discussed Enumerated Powers, and the 10th Amendment. But you ignore that, and went into accusing me of scare tactics.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          But clearly the Constitution of America is up for interpetation. You have stated things need fixing. We are are waiting for the how. Tell us!

                        • See, you are too stupid to understand that it’s not up to me to fix things out of my home state. Let them fix it. That is the policy. If they need help, why we are neighbors, and by our own choice, we may or may not help.
                          You keep shouting that I have no policy. Some one will sooner or later believe you.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          So your answer is “i don’t have to do anything I’ll let them do it.” Oh great. Well I won’t be holding my breath until your bright future arrives. lol!

                        • Wow, lie through your teeth. I have never said do nothing. But rather don’t force my solutions on others.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          “it’s not up to me to fix things out of my home state”. To me that says if the world has a problem, “its not up to me to fix things out of my home state” Wow… and here I was thinking I would have to alter the quote at least a little to fit it in there… but you so clearly said that I didn’t have to. And the reason you don’t force your solutions on others is because you don’t have any solutions.

                          You are literally just trolling me. You saw me post that I liked Obama’s lightsaber pic, you replied to my comment by picking on Obama, and it escalated from there. You have no plan, no resolutions, not any even ideas. You are going to let those in power just do all the decision making for you. As long as it “ain’t in your state.” *sigh* Its people like you, sir, that got us into this mess, and it sad to say that its going to be people like me who are going to wwilling dig your back out of it. In the meantime, why don’t you go to your states website, and quit trolling me with you “i have nothing to say” statements.

                        • I wouldn’t troll you if your life depended on it. I was here before you were this morning. And I have been on here for months now.
                          And bite me. It’s people like me that keep jerks like you from becoming the next Hitler. What you fail to realize, is that someone one else will think they are helping you, and it will eventually be something you don’t want.

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Still got nothing to say but insults I see? Not big on self improvement are we?

                        • I’ve got plenty to say, and I have said it. But since I don’t talk out of the left side of my mouth, you ignore it. And keep saying, I know you are, but what am I.

                        • No1askedme says:

                          Why do you two always end up arguing?

                        • Because I stand for for truth, justice and the American Way! And he’s a commie tard.
                          (note, sarcasm)

                        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                          Because I stand for for truth, justice and an Equal Way!! And he’s a carolinian tard.
                          (note, sarcasm)

                        • bitter troll says:

                          bitter troll stands for truth, justice and the troll kingdom way!
                          and i like pie
                          ( note i do like pie…its good )

          • Mina says:

            The Young Jedi series makes mention of types of crystals dictating color, but no where in the ones I’ve read (the first 4) did it say anything about color relating to focus are/skill. I’m not sure how closely the follow canon though considering the series focuses on Han & Leia’s kids and the rest of the younger generation.

            • wallFly says:

              Mina, the only place I’ve seen the types of Jedi broken up into Guardian/Sentinel/Consular is in Knights of the Old Republic and I think they did this simply in order to make it more role-playable while maintaining a feel of the class system of D&D (keep in mind Bioware had just come out of the Neverwinter Nights series and I think they were trying to tie in their fantasy RPG audience with Sci-Fi… just a guess).

              You should check out the Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn though, fantastic series.

              • Mina says:

                I’m not a gamer so I wasn’t aware of that. Thanks!

                And I’ll have to look into it. I haven’t read anything Star Wars in about 7 years, time for me to get back into it.

        • ay dios mio says:

          I knew that too. I just really loved KOTOR.

          • VictoryNotVengeance says:

            It was one of the greatest games I have ever played.

            • ay dios mio says:

              Mass Effect. It’s the spiritual successor. Pretty hard to compare them.

              • wallFly says:

                mass effect was fantastic, really broadened some of the concepts explored in KOTOR (which, never thought was as good as alot of people did, as far as RPG’s go there’s plenty out there that kick it’s butt like Baldur’s Gate, any of the Elder Scrolls from Arena through Oblivion to Fallout 3 (ok, that’s not fair, the last one was post-KOTOT).

                But, if you haven’t already, check out the new “Old Republic” MMO they’re working on. Kind of a KOTOR version of Star Wars: Galaxies.

              • No1askedme says:

                Mass Effect is easily the greatest game I’ve ever played. It’s just so short! :(

        • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

          And don’t choose the yellow color, you won’t be accepted by most other Jedi because of the danger of using a yellow lightsaber.

        • Roguefemme says:

          VNV, I salute your geekiness.

          However, I must point out that the plural of “Jedi” is “Jedi”. :-)

      • bitter troll says:

        sam jackson was allowed to keep his gold plated purple bladed lightsaber, on the hilt it does read ” BMF” on it

        • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

          All of the actors who play Jedi keep their lightsabers, in fact, when cast George Lucas presents a box full of the prop lightsabers with different designs and the actors get to choose their lightsabers just like they would have to build them themselves… if they were actually Jedi.

  18. Chris says:

    Now all we need is a pair of twenty sided dice and his decent to the dork side will be complete.

    • wallFly says:

      ascent you mean

      plus, i prefer my vorpal longsword +5 to a lightsaber anyday.

      um.. ok maybe not

      • charro the Floydist says:

        I’m confused, maybe someone could help? If dice is the plural, but you refer to them as a pair, should you use the singular? As in “Bring a pair of die”, and “Bring the dice”, each meaning the same thing? Though, dice could refer to more than two, as plural does not necessarily denote a pair. I should get some sleep.

        • paws4thot says:

          Die is the singular, dice the general form of the plural yes.

          “A pair of 20-sided dice” is specifying the number of dice (2) and type (20-sided polyhedral, probably numbered 1 .. 20). I’m pretty certain that “a pair of die” is wrong because you’re specifying more than one die. Similarly, “bring me a dice” would be wrong because you’ve asked for one, and used the plural form of the noun.

          • keithybabes says:

            The singular of mice is mouse.
            The singular of lice is louse.
            So the singular of dice is douse.

            • paws4thot says:

              Grouse (pronounced /ˈɡraʊs/) are a group of birds from the order Galliformes. Is the plural of grouse in this context grice?

              • keithybabes says:

                Indeed yes. There is only one exception to that rule: the singular of house is Hice. If you’re the Queen, that is. Oh, but then the plural is hizes. I’ll shut up.

        • keithybabes says:

          The singular of pants is, er, pants.

  19. TheTrueDeraj says:

    I disagree with the man’s politics, but he still seems like a fun guy to hang around with.

  20. VNV, the nesting is failing big time. Feel free to continue your rant here.

    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

      Ok. You gonna give us some policy here? Or were you saving that for my next nest? Cause I have a feeling the only thing you can do is shout “fail” in my direction.

      • I have stated plenty of policy. But since you can only see the left side of any post, I guess you missed it.

        • VictoryNotVengeance says:

          You have stated no policy. “freedom” isn’t a policy. “states rights” is sort of a policy but it doesn’t answer any questions about the problems we face. I am beginning to think you don’t actually have any. To think I wasted all that time! Geez! Well… At least now we know. I am the bad guy who has ideas, and you are the good guy with none. Well that’s a lot easier that way! I can go relax and play video games now!

          • Yes, you are that ignorant. And a real jackass at that. The only defense you can give is that I don’t have a plan to conquer the world.
            VNV/Biden 2012! Reminds me of Pinky and the Brain. What are we going to do tonight VNV? Well Joe, same as always, take over the world!
            (Admit it, you are now singing …..brain brain brain brain)
            Snarf!

            • VictoryNotVengeance says:

              Still no policy! You are just the thing that won’t quit aren’t you!

            • Plenty of policy. You are just like a school yard kid that has to keep shouting the same thing over and over. Must have last word. Must have last word.

              • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                Yeah. Thats me ;) I guess we can take “plenty of policy” as your official stance on poverty, or world hunger? Let me guess. When it comes to magazines you real “all of em”?

              • Ivan The Floydist says:

                Actually, I’m not seeing your policy either. Just you slinging insults.

                • *many* of the ideas…… Sheesh, I want a laptop with a real keyboard. After years of a custom built desktop that died about the time Vista came out, I thought this HP with the newest operating system would keep me from having to upgrade.
                  Yeah, I also thought I looked cool in above mentioned Monster Maroon.

                • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                  Thats not what I was doing. I was asking for legitimate ideas for the future. You had none. It still doesn’t look like you are looking forward. Just like you are looking around or looking back. All you have stated here are all the things you don’t want to change or have any control of changing. Nothing about what you -would- change.

                  • Ivan The Floydist says:

                    Unfortunately, it seems to be the “conservative way”; tear down the progressives ideas, but provide none of their own. *sigh* Some things never change.

                    • Beg to differ with you Ivan. Change all you want, but keep Gov Co. out of it.

                    • Semperfidd says:

                      As opposed to the “liberal way” of taking everything and redistributing it to everyone as the government sees fit?

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        Thank you Semper!

                        VNV, you get home yet and watch that video? I know you had to work late, as you did nothing today but wait breathlessly for my replies all day.

                      • charro the Floydist says:

                        No no, that was me. *pants*

                      • Roguefemme says:

                        Somebody’s been watching Limbaugh again.

                        Raising taxes on the rich (or even just undoing the ridiculous tax CUTS they got under the Bush administration) does not constitute “taking everything”. And spare us the whines about how they “earned their money”, because nobody on EARTH does work deserving of the kind of money they make- least of all a bunch of incompetent CEOs who run their companies into the ground and then fly their personal jets to go beg the government to bail them out.

                        And anyone who throws tantrums over a few bucks of their money being spent to _save lives_ is a complete waste of oxygen.

                        By the way, did you know “Semper Fidelis” was first found carved on a Roman doghouse in Pompeii? It’s also where the traditional dog name “Fido” came from. Just sayin’.

                  • Well, I darn sure would stop the spread of Socialism. Don’t think I don’t have ideas because I don’t believe in forcing them on others.
                    And I would change the world, by working hard, raising my children as productive members of society, and not sucking the teat of welfare. I would and do give assistance to those in need around me. I have taken help from others when I needed it. I spread the wealth around by my choice, and not at the point of a gun.

                    • Ivan The Floydist says:

                      Actually, those are personal mores. And who’s pointing a gun at you? I’d call the cops on ‘em, yes I would!

                    • wallFly says:

                      just to stoke the fires here a bit – what are you reasons for disliking socialism so much? i mean, besides being a republican tenet, what are the actual reasons?

                      seems to me many countries utilize it to certain degrees with quite a bit of success

                      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

                        including ours in some areas

                      • Ivan The Floydist says:

                        Win.

                      • Rando the Floydist says:

                        Hellz yes, wallFly!

                      • Maybe I’m wrong, but as I read history, and understand the entire idea of our Constitution, big government rule always fails in the end. Monarchy’s worked well for quite some time, some better than others, and some complete failures.
                        And it seems to me that many of the European Socialists are beginning a trek back away from it.

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Have any of you read PJ O’Rourke on good Socialism vs bad Socialism? Like, say, Sweden vs. Cuba? I suspect Justacarolinan would agree with his analysis, and VNV possibly not. Anyway, he’s pretty damn funny. Just to nail my colours to the mast I think that the purpose of government is to do the bidding of the people, rather than the other way round. All the problems of the 20th century were caused by governments with ideas.

                      • paws4thot says:

                        Maybe I’m wrong, but I think that a lot of Americans (mostly their “conservatives”) confuse “democracy with social programmes” with totalitarianism. I’ll agree with Justacarolinian that there’s a move away from totalitarian models, but that doesn’t equate to a move away from social programmes.

                      • Roguefemme says:

                        YES! Thank you! Finally, someone sensible.

                • charro the Floydist says:

                  I like searching for my name, I can see when people are talking about me.

                  No I have nothing to add, but I wanted to interject that.

                  And now for some related song lyrics!

                  You’re in a mess cause this is the end
                  God he cannot bless not leading your hand
                  In your mother’s womb you feel warm and safe
                  But that’s a fallacy cause this is your grave

          • Roguefemme says:

            Lack of ideas is practically a requirement for joining the Republican party. Too much thinking makes you unpatriotic, yanno.

  21. Rohvannyn says:

    But it’s not a RED lightsaber….

  22. Yelp says:

    Well now we know why Obama scrapped Bush’s missile shield project: we don’t need it, he can use the force to send back missiles where they came from.

    • wallFly says:

      just curious, but did you read Gates press release? even if you didn’t the unclassified stuff they’ve released as far as airborne or sea-based missile defense systems are pretty impressive.

      you were probably just messin’ but the stuff they’re releasing is the unclassified stuff, so just imagine what they’re actually using out there. also, google “kinetic projectile” or even some of the advances they’re making in microwave or sonic weaponry. pretty cool stuff

  23. bitter troll says:

    hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kids…

  24. Jojo says:

    I’m a devout conservative and I hate everything about Obama… but… this pic makes me smile.

  25. Ron MacQuarrie says:

    Saw the original on Reddit.
    There was a guy in the background picking his nose. . .now THAT was an awesome picture.

  26. aaron says:

    500th comment! yay.. anyway… LOOK A DISTRACTION! 500th comment teehee

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      Now THIS is a unique opportunity. Ordinal post for a 500th comment.

      Finger Eleven is a Canadian rock band from Burlington, Ontario, formed in 1989. They originated in Burlington, Ontario, as Rainbow Butt Monkeys. They have currently released five studio albums, with their album The Greyest of Blue Skies bringing them into the mainstream. The 2003 self-titled album achieved Gold status in the US and Platinum in Canada, largely due to the success of the single “One Thing”, which marked the band’s first placing on the US Hot 100 Chart at number 16. Their 2007 album Them vs. You vs. Me launched the single “Paralyzer”, which went on to top numerous charts including the Canadian Hot 100 and both US rock charts, as well as reaching #6 on the US Hot 100 and #12 on the Australian Singles Chart. They won the Juno Award for Rock Album of the Year in 2008.

  27. D. Vader says:

    Obi-Wan never told you what happened to your father, did he Barak?

    He told me enough, he told me you killed him!

    No, Barak, -I- am your father.

  28. charro the Floydist says:

    Teal deer.

  29. Blarg says:

    I love that look on his face! It says, “May the dork be with you.”

    /golfclap

  30. Ekkoria says:

    Anyone else notice he has a boner?

  31. Oscar the Mild says:

    It’s Obama Won Kenobi

  32. Savaga says:

    That lightsaber is based on Qui-Gon Jinn’s, which is green. Every Star Wars geek knows that. Why is Obama’s blue? Clearly he’s not nerdy enough.

  33. boink says:

    gotta love unfounded bias, Id bet a paycheck that if there was a picture like this of bush people would call him a moron or a childish idiot or say he was holding the light saber wrong or just anything else negative they could think of. But no, its someone else doing the exact same thing and we just call it funny. Well done to all of you out there. /golfclap

  34. Bob says:

    You can tell by the look on his face is making the lightsaber noise

    schushhhh wraaaoun

    • Roguefemme says:

      ~snickersnort~ I’ll bet he is.

      I’m pretty meh on Obama’s politics- I don’t think he’s nearly liberal _enough_ – but I do like that he’s not afraid to be a little dorky when it’s fun.

  35. Roguefemme says:

    Is anyone else amused by the sudden profusion of anti-national health care ads plastered all over PK?

    And aww, the ittle trollies has a mad. Would you like lollipops to make you feel better?

    Oh, but wait! Giving you lollipops that someone else paid for would totally be SOCIALISM! Lollipops would lead to the downfall of our society! Eeekkk!

  36. paul says:

    yeah funny how nobody realized it is photo shopped… the light saber isnt straight. and its choppy along the light saber

  37. KanyeWest says:

    Yo Obama, I’m real happy for you, Imma let you finish, but Yoda was one of the best Jedi Masters of all time!

  38. sexybeast15 says:

    dats wassup mii presidents black mii limbos blue nd i bee got damn iyf mii flag aint too


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up