Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


America



moonshiners

America, according to europeans

Where did they get that idea? (Via Up Next In Sports)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: dunno source via Our LOL Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 1,158 comments

  1. Bethany says:

    Hmmm…. yeah, no.

    • flib says:

      It should read “American according to Obama”

      • Spanky wants to lynch EWAdams says:

        WIN !!

        • Clearly the great depression was all Obamanations fault!

          we should have him charged with treason for his lies to us!

          • Jeremy says:

            I’m going to assume that you are joking, since the great depression ended roughly 30 years before Obama was even born…. Although it is hard to tell, I live in Texas and I’ve met conservatives who would say this, literally thinking it was true.

            • Igloo McCoy says:

              Dude, his name is “bitter TROLL.” Are you ferrealz?

              • Jane St.Clair Glamorous First Lady of PK says:

                I think this calls for a facepalm.

                • my cable is out!!! clearly its obama’s fault. he is stealing bitter troll’s cable and redistributeing it to poor people who dont have jobs! they dont get cable if they dont have jobs! how am i to watch fox news and be infermed of the important events of the moment.

                  • Default User says:

                    You’re just going to have to read a newspaper to get your news. I’m sorry, but it’s the only way.

                    • awesomeness says:

                      If this is America according to Europeans… then where’s the fat guy? :/

                      • Aaaaargh says:

                        Entirely true. And I’ve visited America and indeed, lots of fat people.

                        I mean, there’s fat people in Europe, but not thàt fat. We only have a few of them and even they try to do some sport, they all play darts.

                        • ZOMG all Americans are fat!!11!1!!!!
                          No we’re not, asshole. Yeah, we have a lot of fat people. Obesity is a big problem here. But it’s not like we’re a nation of giants waddling around. Sheesh.

                        • wallFly the conquering dingo says:

                          stereotype stereotypically confirmed…

                          i think i saw it on the tuuuubes, america is now a nation of giants. we eat babies. (or is that just me?)

                        • Facts Check says:

                          ^ Click for statistics. Suffice to say, America has quite a bit of an overweight problem compared to Europe.

                        • atomus says:

                          Agreed but lots of AFRICAN-Americans are fat, if not the fattest – not just the whities

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Suffice to say, America has quite a bit of an overweight problem compared to Europe.

                          Yes, but we brought the world fast food, so now, you’re catching up! You’re WELCOME!

                        • wtfever says:

                          Americans are only fatter than europeans because we’re rich and we can afford big luxury cars and daily trips to high priced restaurants, were we consume calories that would sustain a European girl for a month… or an African kid for a year!

                        • bad fairie says:

                          just a random thought here that i’m tossing out to be mulled, not fought over: regarding europe’s attitude towards almost worshiping the extremely thin, how much of this attitude is from the early half of the last century where anyone who did not look at least half starved was looked at as a member of the bourgeoisie or aristocracy, then perhaps as sympathizers who were given preferential treatment by a later conqueror?
                          after all, what better way to demonstrate unity with the suffering masses than to be as starved as they were, regardless of the cause of starvation. hence the need/movement to make ultra-thinness chic and fashionable?

                          none of this is to reduce the obesity issue here or elsewhere, but add a different perspective

                        • Rich says:

                          I don’t buy it. Even if it were true that Europe is more obsessed with being thin than America (which I see no evidence to support) I’d expect to see fewer fluctuations in the fashionable measurements. As things stand this stuff changes over time so I don’t think a historical basis is likely.

                          My theory is that people used to be attracted to heavier people because it was a sign of wealth and power. These days anybody with access to junk food can be fat, so that’s no longer a measure of how successful you are… whereas being thinner (without becoming ill) could be a sign of having self-discipline, or the resources to spend on fitness or healthy food.

                        • orly says:

                          It’s not a sign of wealth of power, it’s a sign of having absolutely no self control after seeing a burger.

                        • bad fairie says:

                          oh, really? have you studied any subsistance cultures? in many, those who had power within their tribe/village/region were the ones with access to more food than those lower on the socio-economic ladder, therefore they ate better/more. those same groups tend to see heavier people as more desirable as potential partners because of presumed better health, which for breeding purposes is remarkable – how many children can an anorexic female carry to viability and provide for after birth compared to a female who is overweight?
                          now bring those same people to an affluent country where food is readily available, they aren’t going to change their concepts overnight nor within a generation or two – it is a part of nurture, not to mention the probability that those people who’s ancestors carried genetic traits to horde calories to survive starvation periods are also more apt to be overweight.
                          now for a completely almost unrelated spin on obesity – did you know that steroid drugs prescribed as part of chemo can cause weight gain, low thyroid causes weight gain, undercompensating with insulin in a diabetic causes weight gain, depression can result in weight gain, as does alcoholism, and some eating disorders including a type of brain damage/malformation/chemical imbalance within the brain that shuts off the nerves that register satiety.
                          not every person who is overweight is so because of an inability to say no

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          All true. However, I think that’s a T-R-O-L-L. Shhh. You’re spooking him. They don’t learn; they turn on you with the impart of information. If you refrain from trying to retrain it, it’ll just go away quietly.

                        • gow says:

                          not all of them a lot of them though :(

                          and now kids less see all the gun toting patriots defend themselves :D

                        • Dutchy says:

                          @wtfever
                          Thats exactly the thinking that screwed america up.
                          75% of the population THINKS it can get big cars and such,
                          but only 25% can actually afford this lifestyle.
                          The rest just thinks: the guy next door bought a big car (or fridge etc.) i have to get one too.
                          (not accurate percentage, but you get the point atleast i hope you do)

                        • European says:

                          i live in a small european country and the image i got from america is a great deal of potencial but so but sooo little achievments… in here we do the same things with half the stuff you have…. also all ur high schools are filled with bullies and dumb blondes, ur southern territories are filled with guns and dumb people and you are so full of fat and dumb people….

                          that is the image of what we see u as… not necessarily true but since i heard u guys got like 8XXL there… its awkward all i could ever find here is like XXL and even those are few in shops, so maybe just maybe u do have more and in higher numbers….

                          also… we blame you guys for screwing the economy… specially with that iraq thing…. yeah even we could tell that GWB was dumb and we only saw some speeches of him…

                          and thats the way we see you… u see us as pricks and snobs… so maybe we are :P dunno

                        • runlevel0 says:

                          I miss the fat guy with the cowboy hat and the gun.

                          I’m disappointed. It’s all O’Bamer’s fault, sure, he photoshopped this important document to make us EUrian think that all USians are slender organic beer-browers.

                          Hmmm…. beeeeeer ….

                        • Sunnivaixchel says:

                          (according to reader’s digest)
                          the english think we’re slobs
                          the french think we’re fat
                          and the polish are just glad we aren’t russian

                          (not my words)

                          and yes, americans in general are kinda fat.
                          it comes from all the fast food we eat.

                    • runlevel0 says:

                      Well, I just read that the British where gathering a fleet to defend the USA against the Irish invasion lead by O’Bama !!

                      Until the saviours arrive you should defend yourselfs against the lies of the Irish and in no way accept the Euro as your currency! The Euro is BAD, and it smells bad too!

  2. medicboy214 says:

    Europeans aren’t too far off :D

  3. ratt says:

    I think you mean, ‘West Virginia according to the rest of the US.’

    • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

      ^Much better caption.

      • creaturefeature the pie maker says:

        A pity the writer of the original caption didn’t have the guts to give his/her name when they submitted this cr%p.

        • 8 says:

          Why do you care what his name is? Unless if you want to make it personal between he and you, just argue against the caption.

          It always makes me laugh when some guy gets offended by what someone’s opinion on the Internet and all he has to say is “You’re too cowardly to put your name”.
          His name is not relevant to anyone, except to someone who wishes to track him down and smash his face in. It’s actually because of those people that nobody gives their name on the Internet. It’s actually rule number 1 on the Internet.

          • Default User says:

            It doesn’t have to be their real name, their common internet name would suffice. We just want to know who needs to be ridiculed for their poor humor skills if they start making comments.

  4. Chartreuse says:

    Actually … we just think you people are fat.

  5. Sven says:

    You give yourself way to much credit. We think you are fat an way to religious.
    Actualy, they look more like Rusians to me.

  6. dzutan says:

    this is exatly what I think of America!

  7. Glasofruix says:

    Seems accurate enough to me…

    • ay dios mio says:

      Then you need to pull your head out of your butt, and look at the real world.

    • And how many Americans have you met? I’m guessing zero. Americans, in general, are pretty fvcking awesome.
      Don’t tell the conservatives I said that. I’ve got my reputation to maintain here.

      • Glasofruix says:

        There’s some of your “born again” zealots patrolling here, so yes i’ve already seen quite a bunch of americans.

        • Glasofruix says:

          *there are

          /returns to his english book

        • So. You base your stereotypes of Americans on a few posts by some random people on a LOL site. You can’t be serious. And the zealots tend to be trolls. That’s totally not fair, and you know it. And there’s nothing wrong with being religious.

          • mabsba says:

            “You might be a religious zealot if you think everyone ELSE is a religious zealot.” ™. :D

          • Glasofruix says:

            By here i mean where i live (well maybe i’m not clear enough), there are some young people from baptist church, they intruduce themselves as envoyees from america, speak with american accent and try to convince old ladies in public transports.

            • viking gal says:

              Those young people are only envoys from their own church. They are NOT envoys for the country the USofA. They might like to think they represent the whole of the US, but they do not. And please feel free to tell them that, next time you encounter them.
              The US probably does have a higher-than-average percentage of religions which evangelize. Which is undoubtedly a side-effect of all of the religious folks who left Europe so as to practice their own religion (rather than the state religion of their country of origin).
              There are a few communities where such behavior predominates, but it is not the national tendency.

              • Yeah, that’s still not fair. You can’t base your entire perception of a 300 million+ population on a few wingnuts that you’ve seen wherever you are. In fact, I’d say most Americans hate the kind of crap that you (Glasofruix) are describing. Yeah, there are a number of them, but they are regularly mocked here in the States.

                • Terrell Owens says:

                  Exactly. I once met a French man in Seattle and he reeked of booze and cigarettes. Now, if I would to make an assumption that every French man smells like that, would it be a bit asinine of me?

            • mabsba says:

              Ditto to VG (below). Most Americans hate those people just as much as you do. I am working on a new door sign: Here’s the deal — you keep your First Amendment rights to yourself and I’ll keep my Second Amendment rights to myself. (Those being free speech/freedom of religion and right to bear arms amendments, respectively.)

              And no, I’m not an American ‘gun nut’; I’m just hoping the threat will dissuade them. ;)

    • Glasofruix says:

      Btw, I wasn’t serious from the beginning (well except for the born-again-zealots swarming aroung train stations), relax people try some humor :D

  8. Mr. Gerbz says:

    What we think of yankees in general is a combination of this (rednecks), fat people, and stupid religious fanatics. And a few intelligent people.

    • n00bs says:

      What we think of euros in general is people who don’t wash, have bad teeth, and are a bunch of losers that can’t even protect their own countries so we have to spend our money to do it. And a few intelligent people.

      • GD says:

        come on, Americans LOVE Europe! Because we’re libertines(in comparison to the American ways)
        you say we don’t protect our countries? i say we’re smart enough not to resolve our differences with violence America doesn’t spend money on Europe, they waste money invading middle-eastern countries, countries that don’t have a chance against them, this at the cost of hundreds and hundreds of lives, both “foreign” and American
        we don’t have family and friends going off dying in a country far far away
        we have peace, free healthcare and better education
        we’ll just go ahead enjoying all that
        call us losers
        we aren’t bothered

        • n00bs says:

          Just see how much longer you have all that freedom when we no longer are able to keep your countries safe. Resolving your differences without violence only goes so far… Especially when you are dealing with tyrants.

          • Rammkatze says:

            Thank you for your nice comment. Now I know american history books stopped being updated in the 40′s.

            • n00bs says:

              Right, again, please see my comment below about STEROTYPES! Then take a look at some of the comments in here directed at Americans. Thanks.

          • Churj says:

            Umm… so I have nothing against the US or against Europe. I just feel it necessary to point out though that European nations (and Canada! Woo!) are providing more support in both Iraq and Afghanistan than any other region on Earth.
            On top of that, What are regarded as the second to fourth most powerful armies in the World are all in Europe (Russia, Germany, Britain). I’m pretty sure France is regarded as sixth or seventh as well. Europe is quite capable of defending itself.

            • Churj says:

              Oh, and before anybody throws a fit and screams “what about China!!11!!elebenty!!1!”
              While China, India, Burma, and North Korea may all have larger militaries manpower wise, the severe shortcomings in equipment and training make their armies less effective.

          • Dutchy says:

            n00bs , turns out you really are a n00b.
            OK, you can defend your country (and others), but right now your country is going down a slope which you chose to dive of yourselves.
            Hello? economy much?
            If you ask me , america should stop behaving like the ‘police’ of the earth and mind their own buisness.
            maybe instead try to fix their own problems that would be a great start.

            • I hate to admit it, but I agree with this.

              • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist Pastafarian says:

                I’ve agreed with that for years.

                • Which is why I was so very disappointed with Obama’s Nobel Prize speech and his new “No Mr. Nice Guy” bit that he’s been playing around with. That’s not what I voted for.

                  • n00b says:

                    Well he’s just finally starting to become realistic, reality does that to you.

                    • froofrou who is pissy today says:

                      I disagree with you completely on that statement, n00b. He is NOT becoming any more realistic than he was the day he was elected. The problem is that he’s fallen victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous is Never Get Involved In A Land War in Asia, but the third most famous is You Can’t Please All The People All The Time. And that’s what he’s trying to do, and is therefore pissing off everyone.

                  • Bladed Advocate says:

                    I love the fact that his daughter woke him up that morning…
                    “Daddy daddy! The TV said you won something!”

            • n00b says:

              Yes, but we are all part of one big economy now, so what happens to us, happens to the world and visa versa. Our problems are your problems and your problems are our problems. That’s just how things are now, we are becoming more and more a global community. If we stopped standing up to tyranny, who would do it? The UN? LOL!

            • Naoyusimi says:

              The thing the Dutchy, there, doesn’t realize, is that an awful LOT of Americans agree with this!

              We are not our government (even tho it’s *kinda* supposed to be that way), and neither are YOU.

              • Dutchy says:

                Im not saying i could do a better job at being president of the U.S. im just saying they arent paying enuf attention to their own country and people.

        • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

          As an American that has lived in Europe, I hate being put in the place of defending the Iraq and Afghan wars. I disagreed with Iraq and was wary of Afghanistan. Regardless, Afghanistan was supported by most European countries and they did send troops to help out initially. Although liberals in the states like to make fun of the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Iraq, there were a number of European countries that supported those actions as well.

          PS: It doesn’t support your argument that Europe has better education if you are unwilling to even follow standard practices for capitalization, much less punctuation.

          • GD says:

            somehow i don’t think the usual norms of grammar apply on this site. see the Lolcats section to see what i mean.
            it’s about what you say, not using capital letters

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              Except for the situation in which what you say has to do with how you are saying. Please, don’t make me think of the spelling on the lolcats site, it makes me sad. I meant to put a smiley face to show sarcasm next to the PS, but hit enter too quickly. :(

          • Mr. Gerbz says:

            While I hope that in the future a lot of things are more equal throughout Europe like education, currently we are far from this goal.
            For example, we in The Netherlands have a pretty decent education system (could be better, if it wasn’t for those religious people in our government), but the education in Spain, Germany, and France is pretty bad for example. Most of them don’t even learn sufficient English.

            • Default User says:

              If the learning of a specific foreign language is your primary basis for why the schools are not up to par, you might want to consider going back to school to see what else they teach besides foreign languages.

              • paws4thot says:

                Given that you’re addressing a Netherlander, who will speak Dutch, English, French, German, and quite probably Italian and Spanish to a sufficient standard to hold this conversation in any of them, you might want to rethink that comment.

                • Default User says:

                  No, being able to speak a bunch of languages fluently is a very good skill, but is only a fraction of what you should be learning in school and will definitely limit your future employment opportunities. With only the ability to speak other languages you can get a job as a translator, or you can get a number of minimum wage jobs, but even with those you’ll still be limited if you can’t do things like simple math.

        • viking gal says:

          “American doesn’t spend money on Europe”. Sounds like someone doesn’t remember the Marshall plan, and does not understand international banking. If we hadn’t bailed out AIG and hit our major banks with a cash infusion, YOUR banks would still be trying to borrow money along with ours.
          As for “call us losers”? No, I am too intelligent to have such a shallow monolithic view of such a large group of peoples. Unlike yourself.

          • GD says:

            i see, you say you’re too intelligent to insulte me. but then you do

            • viking gal says:

              I’m not aiming at your entire country. I can see the difference between a group of persons and an individual. I can also see the difference between a country’s government and the people who voted it in. After all, not everyone voted for the party who won the top offices. And the folks who won, and who chose the country’s economic and military policies might have mis-represented themselves while running for office.
              Your statements above castigate the entire country and all of the people in it as a monolithic unit. You might have chosen to clarify your statement to better reflect your opinion, but instead you chose to defend your ‘name’ with a ‘bounces off me and sticks to you’ sort of statement. And yes, I do call that stupid.

              • GD says:

                well, if that’s the way you wanna go…
                you’re stupid!

                • Naoyusimi says:

                  Carefully ignored everything she said and went straight to the childish return . . . great way to redeem yourself.

                  • n00bs says:

                    I think GD is a troll… He posts under at least two other names.

                    • mabsba says:

                      So, is MPD (multiple personality disorder) a leading characteristic of trolls? :)

                      • bad fairie says:

                        no, but MSD (multiple sock disorder) is frequently manifested by trolls, but is a reliable indicator

                        • bad fairie says:

                          that should have read: and can be a reliable indicator, or but can also be a reliable indicator of several psychological disorders

                          & a word the wise, ‘never try to think while a pup is trying to bury her waffle behind you’

                        • keithybabes says:

                          So that’s what the kids are calling it these days. :lol:

                        • bad fairie says:

                          lol, keithybabe – i don’t know what kids call anything these days ;) but i know what it is when my roommate gives my pups more people food than they can eat at one time and the silly pug brings it to grandma to hide from the others…. and i wish that’s what hiding a waffle was, it would be so much easier than what i cleaned out of my computer chair today after i sat in it…again…

                • Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

                  You do realize in comparison to rock solid stance VG layed out before you, your response pretty equals “Mah bwain huwt twying to make big word argu-arguma-…. big wowrd fighting! Yur Stoopud!”

              • Joysgirl says:

                Well put!

            • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

              You are a single person. You are also a douchebag. Therefore I’m sure there are more insults in your future. All Viking Gal said was that she isn’t going to stereotype and insult an entire group of people. Your superior enlightenment is certainly shining through.

          • Fidelio says:

            I am sorry to say but your post shows such a high level of ignorance, it hurts my brain.

            You claim that people here do not understand international banking, yet you have a curiously distorted view of it, yourself.

            The banking crisis (which was largely triggered by the Bush (and to a lesser extent the Clinton) administration pushing housing for everybody, making it very interesting for Banks to give credits there, no matter what the cost. The deregulation of Banks forced by the Bush administration created the perfect storm then.

            The financial earthquake had its origin in the US, but it affected and dragged the rest of the (just as greedy) world down with it.

            Your “saving” your banks and AIG was not a noble gesture to help “Europe”, it didn’t even effect Europe all that much – it was a measure to protect the American economy, first and foremost. European countries had to bail out their own banks, spending at least as much money.

            There is a good reason that the Euro is so much stronger than the Dollar right now – and it is not just your trillions of Dollars you borrowed from the Chinese to finance the Oil wars. (And please don’t kid yourself, America isn’t “protecting” Europeans from “Tyrants” – they are protecting their oil replenishment.)

            You seem to have a very contorted view of reality there, better get it checked

            • viking gal says:

              Did I claim that the US bailing out their banks solved all of the problems of the financial systems of the world? No. But if they had not done their share of bailing, the ripple effects would have been tremendous.
              If you’ve read through this thread (or read previous comment threads), I am not a ‘USA over all’ type. However, GD was being excessively anti-US, and my comments were aimed at him.

        • Jeebus Crepes! says:

          So, you would have defeated the Axis powers in WWII without the U.S.? …yeah, thought so.

          • N_M says:

            could’ve America existed if it hadn’t been discoverd in the XV century?
            you can’t say America did this or that in WWII. that’s too far away. you can’t go more than 20 years back in time. Not so long ago everyone wanted the American dream. Not anymore. This caption is what Europe thinks of America now.

            • Given that the discovery of America goes back 600 years, yet WWII was only 70, I don’t think you can actually say that we can only go back 20 years. We’re still talking recent history and there are still veterans of that war alive (not so with the discovery of America.) But since you want to take a narrow view of history, what do you suppose the European continent would be like if America hadn’t kept Soviet Russia at bay? And taking that a bit further, do you think that Russia’s expansionism would have stopped with the few countries it did dominate?

              • viking gal says:

                I have friends who escaped from Hungary in the 1950′s who would agree heartily with Eddie.

                • Naoyusimi says:

                  Not only that, would we be fighting in Afghanistan now if Russia hadn’t have tried to invade it–what was it?–30 years ago? Okay, it could be said that it’s partially our misstep for not moving in & helping more after the Russians pulled out, but still . . .

                  The problem with this mudslinging back and forth is that the world is too connected–politically, economically, all of it–to hang on to this juvenile nationalism. We’re going to have to let it go, eventually.

                  The next mindset, the only one that will save us, will be:
                  We’re humans on this blue ball–and we’re all we’ve got.

              • EJNorth says:

                I don’t think you got your facts right there (no offense), Soviet was actually only in “war” with the US, because both were superpowers. So it all became some sort of competition, so if the US didn’t exist there would be no cold war.

                • I didn’t say “didn’t exist”, I said kept the USSR in check. Can you imagine what the European continent would look like today if the US had pulled completely out of Europe after WWII? As for my facts, the only reason there was a cold war in the first place is because of Russia’s expansionism. Had Russia been content with kicking Hitler’s ass and withdrawn to it’s own borders, there wouldn’t have had a cold war. In addition, why do you think Berlin was divided for so many years? It wasn’t the US that put a wall up. Maybe YOU should go and look up your facts.

                • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                  And that whole thing about the Soviet Union wanting to expand its zones of influence for ideological reasons.

                • Damn us Americans for existing and creating that cold war!

            • charro says:

              “that’s too far away. you can’t go more than 20 years back in time”

              Whose rule is this? Did you just make that up? Seems subjective and fallacious to me.

            • bad fairie says:

              what?! the americas were only found a few hundred years ago?!?! then who the heck met the white man on the shores? phantoms and figments? the americas were settled over 10,000 yrs ago, or are you that eurocentric that the native americans (both northern & southern tribes/nations) are of no consequence to your viewpoints?

              • Default User says:

                There were also the Chinese who visited (but didn’t stick around) in the same century as Columbus, then there’s some interesting theories on Africans having established trade routes with South America. Even Leif Erickson stopped by New England for a bit near to a millennium ago. If you do the research there are some really interesting theories and evidence regarding the interaction of the Americas with the rest of the world.

            • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

              I love how you don’t realize that you need to change your email address as well as your name when going a-socking. You still have the same avatar, you idiotic twit.

        • n00bs says:

          Oh, and the post of mine that you were responding to was rife with “STEREOTYPES”, like the one I responeded too and many of the posts in here. I made that post to make a point, let’s just bring out ALL the steotypes.

        • DD says:

          We spend tons of money on you guys so that every 50 years you guys don’t fall into another crazy war that is oh-so-common to Europe, which would cost us even more money and lives when we have to come break up the fight.

        • Jeri says:

          “America doesn’t spend money on Europe,” You would make great liberals here, just waiting for that next free handout. America owe s Europe nothing yet we guard your borders from enemies at great sacrifice to our selves and have even forgiven millions in post war debt. Yet you think we should ‘spend’ on you. Obviously you lack the will, the intellect and the dignity to make your own way. I spent years in Europe, I know where real freedom lies.

        • DaDave says:

          You would be surprised at the amount of foreign aid the U.S. gives various European countries.

          And, you are right, Europe doesn’t resolve differences with violence. That is why France had those wonderful immigrant riots, and why Brittan is a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists.

        • Rax says:

          Seeing that your entire history is riddled with conflicts, wars where you neighbor came to take your land, thats a rather silly statement.

          As far as your education system, I am pressed to find any life-defining invention from Europe in the last 40 years.

      • EJNorth says:

        But you guys have spend so much money on the “war factory” that you have dept to China, isn’t that true?

    • nickj says:

      Very nice. Love the religious fanatic comment. I guess anyone who does not strictly segregate their religion or faith from the rest of their life is a fanatic? Now, get out of your western mindset and examine the rest of the world.

    • sarahjane says:

      Yep, that’s about right.

      Oh – and I LIVE here and have all my life. :)

      Most of the fat people are both religious fanatics AND rednecks.

  9. viking gal says:

    I blame Jerry Springer…and would like to know which idiot it was, who decided to export a show that I wouldn’t ever consider watching?

  10. BoredomCorner says:

    I’m Canadian, and I think a lot of Americans are religious fanatics and selfish/ignorant morons.

    And BTW I get that impression by talking to you people on forums and seeing the idiots some of you (ie. Republicans) want to run your country.

    • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist says:

      Aren’t you people supposed to be more passive/aggressive?

    • Basara says:

      You misspelled “Democrats”.

      It’s really funny that most of the stereotypes people seem to have of rural Americans are applied to the same people while being mutually exclusive.

      Like the fact that the religious nuts are part of the same population as the bootleggers and moonshiners.

      Hell, one could probably make the case that said bible-thumpers are that far over the top from having to constantly fight the battle with the bootleggers, drug dealers (urban wastelands have NOTHING on the number of prescription drug dealers and pot growers in Appalachia) to try to protect their children from those things.

      Frankly, most Republicans don’t like the religious fanatics either, but they end up with that party because of the “lesser of two evils” situation. On the other hand, the Democrats have pretty much given their most fringe and most corrupt factions free reign to run their party.

    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

      Proof that in fact not all of us are polite… unfortunate.

      Yes it does, from what we get second hand from the media, and internet forums, appear that the US has a higher concentration of crazies (of all types, but especially religious zealots) however you have to grant for the fact the mad dog always barks the loudest.

      However I rarely do encounter Americans with a chip on their shoulder smaller than a railroad tie. They exist, several even post here, however I would say the concentration per capita of ignorant, arrogant, narcissistic jerks does seem to be a bit higher than it does up here… no offense :)

      • viking gal says:

        There is more of a cultural allowance for the expression of stupid opinions in this country. I will grant that. Comes from that old ‘freedom of expression’ in the bill of rights–if you don’t want the government to control what information it available, you have to allow the loonies to talk in public!

        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

          The people most in the spotlight are generally the ones their countrymen find most embarrassing. I’m sure if anyone down there stopped to look at Canadian media for a while, we would all come off as whiny b!tches with funny accents… in fact come to think of it that IS in fact how we tend to be portrayed by your media so I guess that proves my point.

          It’s the ego thing that tends to bother me. Yes, I am well aware many, if not most Americans aren’t that bad, but from my direct experience with Americans there seems to be a bit of a culture of superiority over the rest of the world that we find… irritating. Moreover it come across as each individual believes they are superior to the rest of America. Individuality is great, but it needs to be balanced by equality.

          • viking gal says:

            Hubris. *sighs* It usually bites them in the butt, sooner or later!

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              I just want to clarify, I don’t hate Americans, I find some of the general trends in the US disturbing, but I know there are plenty of good, kind, intelligent people in the US, some of whom are just as disturbed by the same trends. I think in general we Canadians really do love America, we just find it hard to see our big sister going through such a hard time.

              *squeezes America*

              • viking gal says:

                *squeezes Canada*
                We loves you back–except maybe when you send the arctic clipper our way! :P

                • mabsba says:

                  Aww…. *squeezes Canada also and whispers could you send us some more of your cheap drugs?*

                • Default User says:

                  Or when you borrow our favorite skirt without asking, and tattle to mom and dad about what time we came hoe last night! But we still love you little sis. Most of the time. :D

                • bad fairie says:

                  some of us like the cold arctic weather that gets sent our way, it keeps our ski resorts running and occasionally chases home the wimps who can’t handle real weather ;)

                  • viking gal says:

                    I don’t mind cold, I just don’t like it when the polar air slips down to New England! O.o If that makes me a wimp, so be it! :D

                  • Charro God says:

                    I hate the arctic blasts. HATE.

                    • I hate the cold. I hate the hot. Is there anyplace that’s 70 degrees year round?

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        The mall. Duh. You should know that! ;-)

                        • Do I look like Jason Lee? Do I look like someone who wants to live at the mall? I think I spend enough time there already. *shudder* ;)

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Lol…you have to admit, though, it IS 70 degrees all year round.

                        • Default User says:

                          We don’t have with this ‘weather’ nonsense here in San Diego. The counties thermostat is set to 73.2 degrees year round and the cloouds are set to Sunny/partly cloudy as well.

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          That settles it, DU. That’s where I’m going.
                          ::goes to store and buys one of those “For Sale By Owner” signs and puts in front of the house::

                        • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist Pastafarian says:

                          Yeah, the weather is great, but earthquakes terrify me. O_O

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          But Ivan, are they scarier than hurricanes?
                          I love FL; it would be my second choice, weather-wise. As I recall, though, the humidity in southern CA was nowhere near like near tropical FL. Just sunny. I was there several times when I was younger. Never encountered an earthquake, so I don’t know if I’d ride it out well, or not.

                          Cost of living is high in any lovely climate, but between the two, which would you think is higher? I’m guessing southern CA. I might have to consider that. :)

                        • Jess says:

                          i’m 23, lived in florida every year of it. this year’s been exceptionally awful for a winter- it’s been high 80s everyday since “fall”. can we, for the love of the noodlegod, get a “cool” day ONE TIME this year?!?!?!

                        • Default User says:

                          CA is probably more expensive, depending on what part (even in San Diego county the cost of living can change notably depending on where you live) BUT! (the but needed it’s own exclamation mark yes.) Florida has hurricanes, most years the state gets hit my a hurricane. We don’t have those here. We once got rained on a bit by a hurricane that hit baja but that’s it really. As far as earthquakes go they really aren’t that big a deal. one example I can give(out of the many I’ve survived : P ), I was talking to my supervisor at work one day and she said “Is that an earthquake?” “I dunno, maybe, could just be the construction down the street” we both shrugged and went back to what we were talking about and later found out it was an earthquake. Didn’t do any damage and many people didn’t even feel it.

                        • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist says:

                          That’s my constant complaint; WHERE’S MY WINTER??? >:(

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Ivan, I’ve a spare room if you want a little winter to visit. ;)

                      • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                        well… if you made that -70 you could count Yellowknife… I know Some parts of BC that rarely drop below 30, but this whole ‘warm’ thing you Americans keep talking about confuses me a bit… around here we currently have about 3-3.5ft snow (drifts up to 5ft) and are hovering around -40, and this summer we were somewhere around 90-95 for a few weeks… did I mention that the only reason southern Alberta isn’t a desert is because the rest of the year it’s tundra :P

                        • Bladed Advocate the Highwayman says:

                          Green Beard – from what I can recall when we met – lives in Alberta… (we Canucks all know each other, you know… and yes we also know Steve, thanks for asking)
                          Therein lies probably Canada’s strongest representation of what the United States would term ‘Republicans’.
                          Ol’ Blade, on the other hand, lives in British Columbia – which is not anywhere near Columbia nor is it particularly British… though some people here wish they were…
                          We in BC could be termed ‘tree-hugging, liberalist, pot-smoking, Berkenstock-wearing hippies’… but Green Beard and I get along just fine.
                          My highwayman skills drive the farmers east and north towards the Athabasca River where our intrepid pirate loots them for their hay!
                          Stereotypes are awesome!

                        • Vila Restal says:

                          Kids today have no stamina!! My God!! I experienced real cold when I was in the Navy. You try repairing an comms aerial when you are currently 20 odd miles off the coast of Northern Norway. **walks off muttering about kids today**

          • lolpuncher says:

            I think most countries have that issue. Its not a bad thing, its just nationalism. Thinking your country is the best is not really bad. I’m sure Canadians, Chinese people, Germans, etc… can all give reasons why their nation is the best.

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              I cannot speak for the others, but as a Canadian I think the sentiment is more along the lines of we are superior in some areas (otherwise we would just move), but each nation has it’s niches where it excels above the rest.

              From every other nation I hear interchange of ideas, British who desire a policy more like Spain on this issue, French who wish to try a more German style institution for that service and yes, often other countries wanting to be more like America on some issues. There would seem to be more acknowledgment of each others strengths and weaknesses among other developed nations.

              Meanwhile it seems like any suggestion that America can learn from other nations experiences, and possibly take a page from their playbook if they happen to succeed at something strike many (though not all, and I would hesitate to say most) Americans as unpatriotic. There is as you say some level of nationalist pride and even arrogance mostly stemming from culture shock when other confronted by the practices and values of other culture, no matter what nation you are referring to, but there does seem to be an air of condescension that goes beyond that with many Americans.

          • Default User says:

            As an American I can say you are correct about the ego. Alot of Americans do act as though America is superior to other countries in other ways and treat foreigners with a holier than thou attitude which I’m sure they appreciate. Not all Americans do it, but enough to have a negative impact, I’ve noticed it more strongly in older generations especially. A whole “We saved your ass in WWII! You owe us” type of mentality. It gets annoying and old rather quickly.

            Also, no offense Green Beard and don’t take this the wrong way, but you’re accent is kinda funny. :P

            • ay dios mio says:

              I think it’s because America is at the height of it’s empire. Everyone hates the big dog at that moment. Time passes and so does the torch, and Americans will hate whoever replaces us.

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              Now hold on then there, eh. Just because a regional accent in southern On-tear-I-O happens to be pretty darn funny sounding, doesn’t mean we all talk like a bunch of hosers, eh.

              *puts on toque so he can ride his chesterfield down a snowy hill*

              • Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

                I had a buddy from Peterboro, I used to imitate his accent when I waited tables… it made me lots of money. Americans seem to like to give Canadians money.

                • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

                  My sister-in-law is Canadian and she and my brother were married at her family’s lake cottage north of Toronto. All her bridesmaids kept talking about my “american accent” and I was like, “but I don’t have an accent!”

                  • Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

                    Oh but you do dear! And it’s tres seksi! See!? I’m not a stupid Amurican! I can speek French!

                  • Funny, I keep telling all my in-laws that they talk funny, but I don’t think they’re buying it since I’m in the minority.

                    • Default User says:

                      They do speak funny though! Have you asked them how they think the name Megan is pronounced?

                      • I don’t have to ask, I hear it all the time.. they pronounce it as Mee-gan, where as I say it as May-gan.

                        • megalodon says:

                          Garr. And my name IS Megan, and it’s pronounced with a short E, like EGG. I quite frankly hate every time someone uses a long A or especially EE. That is exactly why I asked everyone in college to call me just “Meg” instead, because then no one would misspell it or mispronounce it.

                          (No offense to other Meagans or Meghens or Meghans or Meeeeeeegans, cuz I know we’re all different. Just a personal pet peeve.)

                        • Oh, oh, I hate it when people pronounce my name (Eric) as Errrrr-ic and not Air-ic. That’s really annoying.

                      • Oh, and the name Gerrard.. everyone here pronouncess it as Jarred. First time I heard that, I’m like WTF?

                        • Default User says:

                          I also understand they don’t seem to be aware that there is an i in Jessica :D . And it’s spelled Meeghan. The H is important (I had a friend in high school named Megan, she was from Australia and that was how we decided her name should be spelled.)

                        • While we’re at it, how about the name Danielle? I always pronounced it as Dan-yell, but here it’s Dan-e-elle. Why they insist on adding and taking away letters is beyond me (or even changing the way letters sound)!

                  • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                    The accent thing depends on the location, I have to think about it to hear the accent of heartland Americans usually, just like someone from Saskatchewan, it’s the behavior that gives away the fact they aren’t locals.

                    When I was doing tech support for Americans, my accent was guessed to be anything from Texan (by a Texan no less), Californian, New English(New Englander?), and even New Yorker. Some of us have accents that are dead give-aways, (Newfies and other Maritimers, Frogs, Southern Ontarians, etc.) the rest you probably couldn’t tell they were Canadian (until they walked outside in shorts and a t-shirt in when it’s 30 degrees Fahrenheit or down a keg of American beer and still don’t feel it).

                    • bad fairie says:

                      you mean to say that canadians no longer finish nearly every sentence with ay/eh/ey or however it’s spelled, and you don’t order tay when you want a cuppa tea? ;)

              • A chesterfield? You guys ride couches down snowy hills? And in the northern US (not the NE) they also have funny accents, dontchaknow.

                • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                  We tried to get living room furniture riding added to the Olympics for Vancouver, but the Olympic Comity reacted about the same way you did…

              • Bladed Advocate the Highwayman says:

                Green Beard, this viking gal doesn’t like our accent, eh!
                Huh… I can’t think of what she might be talkin aboot.
                Maybe we should sit on the chesterfield a minute, eh, and if there’s no enough room, I’ll stand at th’arseuver so’s we can all drink some Timmys double-doubles and irish them up with a fourty-pounder.
                That is… until the hydro runs out or we have to jersey someone for gettin’ too pissed…
                I could probably scrounge up twan and a mickey if we runs out… lol

    • nickj says:

      As stated above…
      Very nice. Love the religious fanatic comment. I guess anyone who does not strictly segregate their religion or faith from the rest of their life is a fanatic? Now, get out of your western mindset and examine the rest of the world.
      Westerners (Canada, Europe, Americans…) are not a cultured as they think they are. They actually are worse and frequently force their view on the world and judge it.

    • I’m American I think a lot of Canadians are beer swilling hockey nuts.

    • Oh, and smell like maple syrup! pffffffffffffft

    • The one stereotype that seems to be predominant here in Australia is that all Americans spend their time at Wal-Mart looking over the assault rifles that can be bought.

      So let’s see a show of hands: How many of you spent your Sunday looking over the assorted weaponrs that can be purchased at Wal-Mart?

    • Just out of curiosity, is there a reason you decided to highlight Republicans, or is your bias showing through? Trust me when I say there are idiots on both sides of the aisle.

      • ay dios mio says:

        He highlighted them because the funny comedians must be political experts, and should therefore be sided with.

        • Default User says:

          Are you telling me Carlos Mencia and Dane Cook don’t have degrees in political science? Oh, sorry, you said funny comedians.

  11. MK1K says:

    We dislike the religious fanatics over here too >_>

  12. lolpuncher says:

    Ironically those immigrants are probably fresh out of Europe. Omigod?!!? You mean dumbass Americans are really just descended people from other countries? People need to stop hating. We give more in aid than some countries have in their entire economy.

    • RDF108 says:

      Well America is made up of the bottom rung of society from around the world. Even the Statue of Liberty says so!

      “Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

      It’s a great big joke from France, and America fell for it.

      • viking gal says:

        My father came to the US because Europe (DK, D, N) at the time was just too snooty to let him go to college. Heaven forbid he had originally gone to trade school (parents were too poor to send the last few children to college), and then he made up the difference in studying to take his studentexamen in a different country. He did very well here, and ended up an engineer and co-owner of a successful company.
        Maybe it is a big joke for you, but lots of folks have done very well through leaving the social rigidity of Europe. I’m glad that my Danish cousins are more open-minded than yourself!

        • lolpuncher says:

          Yeah, except for the fact that the “huddled masses” ended up dominating the world. Viking gal has it exactly right. We rejected the caste system of other countries, we accepted talent that was otherwise turned away, and that talent allowed us to become the richest nation in the world.

          • n00bs says:

            Which is the real reason they hate us.

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              Richest nation by what measure? You have the highest GDP, biggest army, most stuff and highest purchasing power. You also have the highest per capita debt, most waste and pollution, greatest disparity of wealth and widest divide in standard of living of any G20 nation. I’m not saying there aren’t people who are jealous of your upper class, but some of us find your claims of wealth a bit over stated.

              • Naoyusimi says:

                I’d have to beg to differ about “most pollution” (possibly “most waste”, too, depending on what sense of this you mean): Many countries have horrible pollution. We have standards in place that are pretty decent, that are, for the most part, followed. When we discover contamination, that area is taken care of. Not so in many countries . . . even those you might not think of right away. Everyone may think of larger developing nations like China, but I heard about a smelting operation in, I think it was Uruguay, awhile back, that was contaminating the land and the water, and nothing was being done about it. Mexico, our neighbor, has horrible drinking water standards. So before you talk about pollution, think about what you’re saying. One of America’s largest exports? What is it? That’s right: FOOD.

                Polluted? Really? Look at all the ingredients in your next meal, baby.

              • n00bs says:

                Greatest disparity of wealth? Have you been to Mexico? I’m a bit dubious of that, also most waste and pollution… If we have a wider divide of standard of living it may be due to the fact thay we have many more wealthy people living here, but we also have the highest standard of living for our poorer citizens, who have it many times better than in most other countries. Our poor would seem like wealthy people in most other countries.

                • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                  I have a hard time considering Mexico a developed nation; getting there, certainly, quite close actually, but not quite there yet. As for your poor being wealthy by comparison to other nations, to Rwanda or Nigeria sure, to Japan or France, not so much. As for waste, I’m not talking total volume per acre (I’m well aware there are many nearly pristine areas of the US), but while most other developed nations have focused on the direction of improving efficiency in both production and consumption, the US seems to have put a much heavier emphasis on sheer volume (albeit major decrease in production since most of that is done in the third world now anyway).

                  • n00bs says:

                    “but while most other developed nations have focused on the direction of improving efficiency in both production and consumption” – I know you aren’t talking about China and India.

                    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                      again… not exactly the comparison I was going for (although again, in a generation or 3 India may get there). I’m thinking the major western democracies here.

                      • n00b says:

                        Not sure it matters if they are polluting the rest of the world and have no intention of stopping, does it?

                        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                          No but that is a matter of trying to develop alternate paths to achieve economic and political development.

                          To use an analogy, it’s like trying to teach your teenage siblings that dependency on drugs and alcohol is bad, you know from experience and trying to help them find a better way to deal with peer pressure and personal issues. Meanwhile your drunken older brother isn’t willing to acknowledge he has a problem, while you and the other adult siblings are all going to AA meetings.

                        • viking gal says:

                          You might consider drawing the drunken older brother into the mix…India and China are having their own versions of our notorious river which caught on fire (back in the 1920′s). Drawing someone into contributing their expertise towards the solution usually works better than yelling at them about how they are part of the problem. But of course yelling at the US is what some folks have come to enjoy.

                        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                          Perhaps not the best analogy. I’m more than willing to accept some of the best, most promising new ideas for improving the efficiency of production are coming from the US, I’m also well aware Canada and other nations are hardly blameless when it comes to over indulging on the worlds scarce resources. It does however seem from this side most American ‘wealth’ was generated merely by borrowing against other nations and future generations in a system that doesn’t entirely account for global and temporal externalities.

                • charro says:

                  Now, I could get preggers, then I would qualify for public aid. But, you see, I’m not one of those “ebil liberals who want to game the system”.

                  Also, the thought of breeding makes me sick.

                  I just want to make my pay and know that I can have basic healthcare without going broke.

                  • Default User says:

                    Also, the thought of breeding makes me sick

                    That’s just the morning sickness, it usually passes by the second trimester.

                    • ay dios mio says:

                      lulz

                    • mabsba says:

                      Lies! All lies told by the evil patriarchy to keep you breeding! :)

                      Actually, I never had particularly bad morning sickness, and since my pregnancy ended just after the second trimester, didn’t have a lot of the other problems (eg weight gain etc). ;)

                      • viking gal says:

                        Friend of mine had morning, noon and night sickness. Lost her first pregnancy due to that. Second was a success even though she didn’t gain a single pound. Third was more typical with weight gain–except that it was twins!

                      • Naoyusimi says:

                        I had one pregnancy where I did nothing but puke. Puked my guts out, any time of the day or night. Soda crackers, you say? Didn’t keep those down, either. Was losing weight. It didn’t last too much longer, though.

                • mabsba says:

                  If you have Planned Parenthood, they do all the girly stuff and are usually the cheapest. Worth checking out.

                  • charro says:

                    They weren’t cheaper than the Health Dept.

                    • mabsba says:

                      Oh. I haz a sad for you. I hate the way that anyone who works but doesn’t have a really good job never qualifies for anything discounted or free. My mom’s clinic would have taken care of you. :)

                      Ahah! I just realized. It’s the health insurance you’re lusting after, not the hubby. ;)

                • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                  On the other hand I, as lower middle class, have my healthcare paid for by my taxes, and still take home after expenses close to $100 after essentials. If necessary I can see a doctor at any time, and if I’m in an accident I don’t need to declare bankruptcy when I get the bill. Oh and we do have insurance companies…

                  You and BT should come try the great white north, a tad chilly in the winter, but we have maple syrup and healthcare :)

                  • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                    sorry my mind wandered in the middle there, but I caught up to it now, we do have insurance companies, my taxes don’t pay for boob jobs and other elective procedures. Medication still comes out of pocket if you don’t have insurance, but thanks to regulation for allowing other companies to release generic versions sooner, the prices are considerably lower

                  • DaDave says:

                    Yes, they should go up north, where they can wait six months to be seen by a doctor then another month to be diagnosed with a recurrence of cancer only to be told that there is only a 10% chance of survival because the cancer was not detected in time. And, then die.

                    Which is exactly what happened to a friend of my ex-girlfriend in Toronto. And, she had to wait eight months to see a dentist.

                    • mabsba says:

                      Got to love those foaf (‘friend of a friend”) stories. :D

                    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                      Eastern provinces tend to mess up the equation a bit, they try to do too much with to little. In Alberta I see a dentist when I want to see a dentist, if the one I want to see is too booked I can wait a few days or find someone who isn’t as busy. I can see my GP a few times a week if necessary (my GP usually gives me heck for not coming in often enough though, apparently a physical every 5 yrs is a bad idea).

                      If you insist on pretending anecdotes are evidence, my mother went from suddenly having headaches to diagnosed with a brain tumor in less than a week and had surgery well in advance of any severe trauma.

                      Yes, your procedures can catch cancer quicker, if you can afford the tests. Our procedures can catch heart disease faster because we tend to do more research in that area while you do more in cancer. We generally swap info but there is a lag.

                    • charro says:

                      Anectdotes =/= evidence. Please state a story with actual facts that is non-fallacious.

                    • Default User says:

                      Eh, even in the US you’re probably going to have to wait a few weeks to see a dentist for the appointment time you want unless it’s an emergency (in which case the appointment time you want is ‘Now! For the love of all that is holy! Now!’)

                    • bad fairie says:

                      how about this: i had insurance, fair insurance — took care of a couple high risk pregnancies with minimal out of pocket expenses, for which i am eternally grateful, however, when i started having headaches similar to stroke victims – my doctor blew it off with ‘well that’s nothing ot worry about at your age’, and when i told him about the phantom odors i was picking up, his comment was ‘i’m sure that’s nothing to worry about.’ it wasn’t until i was able to change doctors (within the same insurance network) did i get a doctor who cared enough to send me for a cat scan. it turns out that i’ve got a fairly inoperable cyst in my brain — if it would have been caught before wrapping itself around my optic nerve maybe surgery would be an option, maybe i wouldn’t have the brain damage i have, maybe i wouldn’t have gone into menopause at 35…..and yes, i am an american — don’t tell me how much better off our way is than others, because this is just the tip of the iceberg of medical horrors i could that pertain to me, my children, or my parents – not ‘friend of a friend’ stories… and if you want proof, i can photograph the 2 reams of just my test results for you…. this is a great country, but it’s got some flaws. looking at fixing them doesn’t make us unpatriotic or anything else derogatory, it makes us sensible… only fools ignore a broken bone and insist the body is whole because there is no blood

                    • viking gal says:

                      GYN appointments in the US are typically a 4 month wait, unless you have an infection.

                    • Default User says:

                      Yeah, but most GYN appointments are for regular check ups and there isn’t a rush for that. When you do have something wrong you can usually get one within the week.

                    • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

                      Even worse, friend of an ex-girlfriend. I mean, if she’s willing to sleep with this d-bag, how can I trust in her taste in friends?

                    • Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

                      John Holmes OBGYN: “Seeing multiple patients at once”

                    • Ah yes, another “Canada is a 3rd world country because of their health care system” story. I’ve never bought those stories. BTW, I used to work for a doctor’s office right here in the good ol’ USA, and a couple of the doctors were so popular that there was a 6 month wait for checkups. You learn to be smart about making your appointments and make them far in advance, unless it’s an urgent matter. Believe it or not, seeing a doctor here in the USA isn’t as easy as the anti-health care reform people say.

                      • mabsba says:

                        I can’t imagine what you’re talking about, Rando. Our health insurance only went up 15% this year (rather than the expected 20%). Only $900 more. But I did only have to wait a week and a half to see my new doctor. :)

                      • Maxwell Silverhammer on set of the best tea party ever says:

                        Yeah I’ve shared this story before, but our company sent out our healthcare “news” packet. BC/BS claimed they expected a 20% profit over claim costs. I find it a pipe dream to think that in an economy where there are few jobs to be had, and fewer that are even buying into health insurance, that expecting a 20% pure profit, is wishful thinking.

                    • Bladed Advocate the Highwayman says:

                      Whoa whoa… are you saying, Hel, that Oilers fans are mentally handicapped?
                      I don’t DISagree, I’m just asking… seenig as though I’ve met some Flames fans as equally – let’s call them retarded – as any others.
                      Vancouver Canuckleheads, too…

                    • Bladed Advocate the Highwayman says:

                      Whoa whoa… are you saying, Hel, that Oilers fans are mentally handicapped?
                      I don’t DISagree, I’m just asking… seeing as though I’ve met some Flames fans as equally – let’s call them retarded – as any others.
                      Vancouver Canuckleheads, too…

              • lolpuncher says:

                I’ve lived in several countries, several in Europe. I’ve also traveled everywhere. I’ve had the best quality of life in America. Most waste and pollution? Please. China builds new coal plants everyday, they don’t even try to cut emissions. Also don’t be so high and mighty. Canada is a tremendous exporter of minerals, including coal. You guys contribute to the problem, so don’t be so quick to point the finger. And yes, my measure of wealth is the GDP. Its kinda the one that most economies use.

                • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                  I’m glad you found a place in the world that works for you.

                  Yes China is potentially the worst scourge on the face of the planet in terms of self destructive behavior. Claiming the US is better than China is kind of a weak argument. Likewise I did say above that Canada is certainly not blameless or without its own problems to fix.

                  My opinion is that GDP by its self is something akin to measuring personal income by gross pay. How much you make is relative to your other costs, and in this case, yes the US makes a vast amount more than the rest of us. They also have a heavier debt load both in real terms and in environmental damage that will eventually cost to repair. It is possible to live beyond your means even when you are making a 6 figure per annum salary. In the end when the debt comes due, you are in the same frying pan as the rest of us.

                  I’m not saying Canada is any better, I just question to what degree if any the American system is superior to ours.

                  • n00b says:

                    It’s all relative GB, everyone is going to think their country is the best and they will all have different reasons why.

                    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                      Agreed, but only through questioning and re-examining the validity of our reasoning do we progress to better and truly stronger nations. I’m not trolling or trying to start a fight. I’m merely attempting to seek the basis of the assumption that ‘America is wealthier’ to see if it can be backed up or amounts to borrowing funds and calling that wealth.

                      I define wealth as net benefit over and above expenses AND debt that can be used to improve quality of life. My question is does American ‘wealth’ meet that criteria.

                  • lolpuncher says:

                    America has the most money, that was my point. As for who has the best system, that’s relative. I think a countries success is based by how happy the people who there are. What all these European haters fail to realize is that most Americans enjoy living here, especially those who came here and got a better life. But if whatever Canada does floats your boat, well good for you.

          • Compulsorry says:

            You’re Chinese?

          • mehmeh says:

            America may be the ‘richest nation’ but what you may call a class divide in Europe (which barely exists anymore) is a race divide in America. The reason why people hate America is because they themselves have turned into the fat snooty kid at school that likes to bully everyone and farts a lot (pollution).

            • lolpuncher says:

              HAHAHA. There is no class divide? What about the widespread hatred for Turks in Germany, Algerians in France, Arabs everywhere, and non-Catholics in Spain. West Germans still refuse to get along with East Germans. Did you know “Ossi” is a derogatory term?

        • Rammkatze says:

          WTF?! What social rigidity?!

      • Giggle says:

        Lulz your comment reminds me of the “degeneracy thesis” of America.

    • Glasofruix says:

      *stop

  13. Teach_J says:

    You forgot a cross to make it complete.

  14. CatLol says:

    Well, that’s exactly what I think of America, except that two of the guys should have been fat.

  15. mcfatty says:

    Well, considering that there are two proper nouns in the caption and only one capitalized letter, I can understand why.

  16. Fred's mom says:

    More like Europe according to Americans. -.- We’re supposed to be ‘inferior’ …

    • lolo says:

      Yes exactly my thoughts!
      If this was Americans according to Europe, they at least need some BIG guns propped up around them.

  17. Charles says:

    Sarah Palin sums up the European view of typical Americans. Her continued popularity only confirms our view.

    • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

      That is like saying that the continued popularity of Jean-Marie le Pen in France confirms my belief that all Europeans are racist and xenophobic.

      • Charles says:

        Well it would imply the French were.

        And you’d be right.

        • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

          The generalization from France to Europe was on purpose. I am pointing out the absurdness of the generalization. Based on Palin’s ‘popularity’, all Americans or even a large portion of Americans fit that description. The US is a large and diverse place, somewhat like Europe.

          • Charles says:

            Possibly, but America has a stronger underlying unity.

            You take an American from the East Coast and he’ll fit in with the West Coast crowd better than a Britain in Lithuania.

            I don’t know if people from Oregon have a pathological hatred or distrust with people from Washington State, but over the same area in Europe you could easily have several groups that dislike each other.

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              You mean, enough hatred to go to war with each other? *Thinks of US Civil War* *thinks of racial tensions in contemporary LA*

              The point is that it is an incredible uninformed stereotype regardless of the “underlying unity”. I am sure you are aware of the increasingly strong showing far right, anti-immigrant parties have made in elections in countries across Europe. This doesn’t mean that all, most or even a substantial percentage of Europeans support these politics.

            • viking gal says:

              “America has a stronger underlying unity”…I take it that you weren’t visiting this site during the last presidential election?!?

              • Charles says:

                The civil war was one war fought 150 years ago. Racism is a trait common to humanity as a whole. But at the end of the day most American’s still cheer for America.

                Despite the EU, Europe is still divided along national lines. Imagine if each state in America had its own language, culture, and foreign policy with 1000 years of conflict between neighboring states.

                I don’t doubt America is a divers place full of opposing opinions, in fact the numerous conflicts between North & South, Black & White, Right & Left are some of the first things I think of when it comes to America. I just don’t believe its as diverse as Europe.

                • viking gal says:

                  Come on over some time. Spend several days each in Boston, Miami, New Orleans, LA, Cheyenne, Tuscon, Salt Lake City, Indianapolis, San Francisco. If you really travel this country, you will find Amish communities, Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods, Hmong enclaves, Chinatowns, little Korea’s, Italian-heritage neighborhoods, a Somali community in Maine… Or just spend a month in New York city.

                  • charro says:

                    No, don’t go to Tucson. It’s really boring there.

                    • viking gal says:

                      But the ‘street spam’ that I saw for Ron Paul during my visit was hysterical! (young folk with funny signs at every 5th intersection)

                    • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

                      I’m not a fan of the Southwest in general, even though I know that’s your hood.

                    • Donald Zerli, Patriot says:

                      Tucson is boring?
                      Oh yeah?

                      Tucson has college students, a large Mexican population, conservative retirees, a lot of old hippies, a huge air force base, and a large seasonal population of homeless people who come there in the winter to escape the cold. When I was there in the 70′s, it also had the most powerful people in the Mafia living there, and it was the main entry point for most of the drug traffic coming up from Mexico.

                      All these people converge on each other like some kind of social train wreck on a daily basis.

                      It doesn’t get any more entertaining than that.

                      Besides, Tucson is the place where a street preacher picked MY face out of a large crowd and announced (shouted actually) to everyone that I was Satan, walking the earth. How can you beat that?

                      Jodi Foster’s character is “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” said it best: “Tucson is the weirdo capital of the world.”

                • charro says:

                  I have to agree with Charles on this one.. We aren’t nearly as diverse as the EU. We’re diverse all right, but not as diverse as them. The strongest point of our unity is definitely our language. While I know most Europeans are polyglot, that doesn’t automatically mean that if you live in Germany you’ll speak Italian. If you live in AZ, you speak English, just like that person who lives in CA. Or NY. Or AL. We can travel among the states in our borders and understand each other.

                  Or try too, I’ve talk to some people in the South that I know they’re speaking English but damned if I know what they’re saying.. :shock:

                    • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                      Yeah, I don’t believe we are as diverse as the EU on any level, but my initial point was that he was horribly mistaken if he thought we were as unified as his earlier posts indicated. I think even as Americans we forget quite how diverse we are at times.

                      I went to college at a small southern school in Georgia. The locals were sometimes hard to understand even though I grew up only and 1.5 hours away in Atlanta.

            • “America has a stronger underlying unity.”
              We DO?!?

  18. Schmitt says:

    ?…no it’s not
    our image of america is: dumb people + fat people…most of the time dumb and fat people

  19. Care Troll says:

    I love all the “America is overly religious” comments. Considering the crusades, the Spanish inquisition, the dark ages and the holocaust, I think the U.S. has been pretty good about controlling their fanatics.

    • lolpuncher says:

      Not to mention the wars of the Huguenots in France, the Catholic/ Protestant conflicts in Ireland and Queen Mary’s massacre of Protestants. The list goes on and on. America had what, the Salem Witch Trials?

      • Naoyusimi says:

        The Scopes Trial . . . a few others.

        • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

          We sometimes also forget why the Mormons didn’t stay in Missouri.

          • Naoyusimi says:

            I don’t know why . . . their breeding practices were similar.
            Oh, zing!
            [BTW, another Iowan, here.]

            Seriously, I think they were kicked out of Ohio & Illinois, too, right?

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              We could just forgo making fun of other countries and make fun of Missouri. Rando should like that. :) What part of Iowa?

              Yeah. They traveled a good bit, but I thought Missouri was the most violent.

              • Naoyusimi says:

                East Coast. Sittin’ about a block from the Mighty Mississippi.

                Yes, Rando would. Missouri’s almost too easy of a target, isn’t it?

                • mabsba says:

                  But…but…Missouri gave us Twain. That must eclipse any faults! ;)

                • Missouri can be broken up into 3 sections: Kansas City (normal people), St. Louis (normal people), the rest of the state (backwoods rednecks who are pretty f’ing scary, especially down near the Bootheel.)

                  • Naoyusimi says:

                    How about Columbia? I went to a pretty f*&k’ng awesome concert in Columbia, about 11 years ago.

                    Jefferson City OK? Gravity Kills was from Jefferson City. (I saw them at the above-mentioned concert . . . I think it was called BoCoMo.)

                    • Columbia is home to Mizzou, so it gets a pass. It’s not quite up to par with the two major cities, but it’s normal-ish. Jefferson City is the capital, so it’s full of Missourian politicians. I think I’d rather take my chances with the bootheel people. Gravity Kills was awesome back in the 90′s. Too bad they didn’t stick around. Missouri doesn’t churn out nearly enough good rock bands.

                      • Naoyusimi says:

                        What is “Mizzou”? I’m guessing that’s a college? Or maybe you have universities down there, now? :P

                        I LOVED Gravity Kills. I’m not one of those people stuck listening to the music that was popular when they were in high school (like their tastes never grew beyond age 17), but I really loved the music of the 90s, so maybe I’ll just get stuck there.

                        NAH! There is still some good stuff coming out.

                        • Mizzou is what we call the University of Missouri. I forget that people outside of MO don’t know that. And yes, it’s a university with a well-respected journalism program and an even more respected party school program.

                          Our local alternative station has “Wayback Weekends” where they play exclusively rock from the 90s. Those are pure awesome in my book.

                        • Default User says:

                          When did the 90′s become ‘wayback’?

                        • Pearl Jam is being played on the classic rock station here. The 90′s are old now. *sobs*

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          I thought to be a “classic” it had to be 20, 25 years old . . .
                          ::ulp::
                          ::remembers when I first heard the Seattle sound::

                        • bad fairie says:

                          correction: to be “classic rock” it has to pre-date woodstock (the original) and should be by someone who knows what a duck tail was (and wore it) who at least knew when the music died, could have performed with elvis, fats, or jerry lee (this does include the beattles btw). anything that is post folk is old rock; if it’s from the late 70′s – it just deserves to be burned (oh, that’s right, we did burn disco), 80′s rock could now be classified as part of the recent oldies, but anything from the 90′s forward is just yesterdays noise.

              • Missouri is not violent, and I’ll beat the piss out of the next person who says that!

            • Hey, hey, we do not share breeding practices with the Mormons.
              Wait, what are the breeding practices of the Mormons?
              And it’s ironic that an Iowan is making fun of Missouri considering all the nasty, terrible things we say about Iowa down here, especially in NE Missouri where I went to college for a year.

              • Naoyusimi says:

                Yes, well you can SAY anything you like about Iowa, it just doesn’t make it true.

                Maybe if you wave that wand, Harry Potter. :D

              • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                I don’t claim the state (too much corn for my liking), I just live there most of the year. :) I like St. Louis a lot. I haven’t made it to anywhere else normal in Missouri though. Everywhere else I have been in MO scares me far worse than any of the tiny bumblefvck towns I used to travel through in GA where I grew up.

    • Charles says:

      The crusades, spanish inquisition and dark ages all ended before the United States came into existence.

      Since then however the US have subjugated and practically wiped out the native population. Enforced slavery and racial segregation long after the rest of the civilized world, and have supported and launched their own crusades. How has America done any better with its fanatics?

      • n00bs says:

        Native populations were not wiped out, that’s a myth. Many more died from disease which was unintentional than in the wars. Also, when did we enforce slavery long after the rest of the world?

        • shane says:

          yeah, those unintentional smallpox laced blankets sure did the trick, didn’t they?

          • n00bs says:

            That is a complete myth, I challenge you to find any evidence that that was ever done purposefully. I can tell you now before you waste any time there is none. There is a letter from a BRITISH officer suggesting it and that is all.

            • Charles says:

              So what was shooting all those buffalo herds about then?

              • Jeebus Crepes! says:

                Sacred meat makes the best hamburgers… fool. :)

              • viking gal says:

                Masculine testosterone excess.
                As for the Native American populations, the US is not blameless. But then neither is Spain, the Netherlands, or any of the other colonizing countries. Not to mention the UK in Australia. Spain was particularly heinous in their treatment of the natives in Central and South America, and the diseases that they brought with them wiped out most of the Native American population in the Northern continent, way before the Pilgrims got to Massachusetts.
                We’re all human, all of our ancestors have done horrible things. Get over yourself already!

                • Charles says:

                  I completely agree with you. If you look at the original argument I was just trying to point out America isn’t perfect.

                  • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                    Believe me, we know ;)

                  • n00bs says:

                    No one said it was perfect, I was just saying there was no deliberate genocide of the Native Americans by small pox blankets, that is a myth.

                    • mabsba says:

                      I don’t know about that particular story, but it is true that the slaughter of the buffalo WAS part of the way the American government forced Native Americans onto the reservations (by removing their food supply). That is pretty well documented.

                      • Icer says:

                        No, that was not a part of the “plan” there was no set plan, though there were a lot of treaties, broken treaties, unfulfilled treaties, etc. that lead to this. The over hunting was cause by enterprising men who could get 1 dollar a hide, get over 100 hides a month, and spend roughly 100 to get into the trade.

                        As well as the bone which was used for carbon black for printer’s ink, and the meat was used later on.

                        Roughly 98% of the Native populations had died out by the 1850′s, and 70 million of the 75 million in the America’s lived in South America.

                        • mabsba says:

                          I’m sorry, but there was wholesale slaughter of buffalo that were just left to rot, so it couldn’t have been solely for profit.

                        • n00bs says:

                          It was a complete waste yes, but there is no proof it was a plan by the government to destroy Native populations or drive them onto reservations.

                        • Icer says:

                          Do you know why they were left to rot? Lets say I shoot 10 buffalo, 4 roam futhur away than I can conceivably retrieve them before they start to rot, 1 I cannot skin before it starts to rot, and 5 I skin and make a profit.

                        • mabsba says:

                          No. Hundreds of buffalo were shot from moving trains and left to rot. And it may not have been officially ordered by the government, but it was definitely part of the way that the American Indians were controlled, by removing their major food source.

                        • Default User says:

                          Icer, you need to A) Work on your skinning speed. B) Stop shooting things you know you won’t have time to skin. C) Shoot to kill, if they can wander so far that you can’t get to them before the start to rot you are a terrible shot. What, did you shoot it in the ear?

                      • Jeremy says:

                        There was blood on both sides. Sure, there have been peaceful native american tribes who have been taken advantage of by the American government. There were also many settlers in the U.S. who just wanted to build their farms and live peacefully, and some native American tribes would go and kill these settlers and their families for no reason. There were horrible tribes like the Karankawa who were aggressive, war-like, and cannabalistic and killed settlers and other native american tribes. The settlers were indeed guilty of bloodshed on many accounts, but it is stupid to think that all native americans were just precious little angels who would never hurt a fly and were just victims of the terrible settlers. Often these natives left a bad impression, which led to prejudice against all natives, not just against specific tribes. Just as many natives believed that all white men were bad guys, because of what the Spanish did to them centuries before.

                        • ” There were also many settlers in the U.S. who just wanted to build their farms and live peacefully, and some native American tribes would go and kill these settlers and their families for no reason”

                          ya know..maybe these natives saw the settlers as ..maybe…INVADERS????

                          hi im here to farm this land

                          no, this is our hunting grounds..

                          nope sorry farm land now, would you like to hear about jesus?

                          really we need this land to hunt on to eat..

                          silly savage…off to the reservation with you!

                        • I can’t believe there are people on here actually trying blame the Native Americans for what happened, or trying to say our ancestors didn’t fvcking slaughter them. Seriously, guys, our ancestors were nasty to the Native Americans. Flat out fvcking awful to them. Don’t make excuses for that viciousness. As for Indians killing settlers, well, don’t we say it’s okay to defend your land from invaders? There you go. Duh. Cheese & rice, people!

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer on set of the best tea party ever says:

                          Dude! Don’t withhold the cheese and rice! I’m starvin’ here!

                        • *burps* Oh you wanted some of that? Sorry, bud.

                    • Naoyusimi says:

                      I think it was the Brits who taught the Eastern Woodlands tribes the idea of “scalping”.

                      • viking gal says:

                        I think you are right about that. And the Iroquois taught the New England European gals that they were getting ripped of in the rights department… Ending eventually in the actions of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and company.

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          OK, THAT I didn’t know. I do know they are (the Five Peoples, and it’s probably “were”, now, since Americans pollute other cultures they deem unsuitable) one of the very few matriarchal and matrilineal cultures. What a shame. We should have learned MORE.

                        • Default User says:

                          The matrilineal cultures seemed the smart ones, I mean, you always know who the kids mother is, she’s the woman who gave birth to the kid. You have only the woman’s word however that the father is who she says she is((not trying to imply that women are liars or prone to adultery, at least not any more so than men), and not all cultures(though almost all, there were a few) cared a whole lot about promiscuity in women, so even if the mother knew who all she’d been sleeping with she still wouldn’t know who the father was for certain.

                        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                          Yep. Judaism is a matrilineal religion/culture specifically because of the numerous enslavements and invasions. And why a lot of progressive rights were granted to the woman almost 5,000 years ago in the marriage contract.

              • bad fairie says:

                at least the later buffalo hunts were sponsored by the railroads (who received massive land grants from the us govt) with the specific intents of clearing the land for homesteaders (translation: subjugate the natives so that they’d become docile and dependent on the government for supplies). by starving the tribes, they went back to the reservations because that was the only way they could stay alive. by the end of the hunts, entire herds were left to rot in the sun, not even the hides were taken because they’d fallen from fashion.

        • bad fairie says:

          really, try telling that to any native that there was not a concerted effort to annihilate their ancestors. or do you think events such as the trail of tears or the pursuing of the nez pierce in the dead of winter, or wounded knee, or…. shall i continue? there is 250 years at least of commited effort to wipe out the native americans.
          and lest we forget, what about what the spaniards did in central & south america?
          not one action taken by our government or any other was done with the best intentions towards native americans. not one.

          • But…but…Native Americans have reservations now! And free turkeys at Thanksgiving (irony FTW).
            My wife’s grandma (pure blood choctaw) has been harassing my wife to get her Indian card for years. She won’t do it, even though she could get extra aid for school and stuff. She doesn’t feel like the government owes her anything just because her grandma is Native American.

          • Naoyusimi says:

            You forgot the horrible massacre at Sand Creek. Mostly old people and children were killed, under Black Kettle’s flag of SURRENDER. If there was ever an argument for what he was trying to do there, it was Covington’s own words: “Nits make lice.” Many of his own men were absolutely sick about it.

            • Naoyusimi says:

              Made an error in that murderer’s name: it was Col. Chivington. I’m so glad his actions followed him the rest of his life, and that he died of cancer in 1892. Here’s hoping it was slow and painful. Karma DOES sometimes work!

            • bad fairie says:

              nope, didn’t forget, i was just holding that one back as my coup de grace if the lackwit came back to argue the point. and that statement along with a few made by our esteemed former president andrew jackson are the definition of the us policy towards native americans. not much has changed since that time period, except the pols have just gotten better at hiding their agenda.

              • Naoyusimi says:

                What absolutely HORRIFIED me the most, of nearly anything primary evidence I’d studied, was a woodcut done in the 16th century, showing the Spaniards lopping off the hands and feet of the natives. This was a woodcut, and the expressions of horror on the faces of the handless and footless natives almost made me cry! Those natives didn’t attack them. They were being punished for not working (probably in a mine) or something like that . . . you tell me that the start of relations between Europeans and the Americas’ natives wasn’t aggressive on the part of the Europeans!

      • lolpuncher says:

        Actually, Spanish, Portuguese, French and British explorers did the majority of the subjugation(*cough Coronado *cough) before America came into existence. The continued immigration of EUROPEANS into America was the driving factor behind the westward expansion and the elimination of Native Americans. And as for the abolition of slavery, several European nations were behind the U.S. England and France thought of themselves as progressive after 1833, however they through all that out the window during the new Imperialism of the the Victorian era.

    • GD says:

      yeah but you forget that all that happend before the modern age.
      we’ve evolved
      there are places in america where thy still teach creationism at school
      i think that says enough…

      • viking gal says:

        And there are places in Europe where they still hassle kids with brown skin. And heckle young women because of their appearance. And have multiple violent riots over foot ball matches.
        Pot? Meet Kettle.

        • GD says:

          yeah cos america’s sooo tollerant. you don’t have racism over there, no, not al all

        • GD says:

          btw, you’re not american, aren’t you?
          cos you said football and not soccer…

          • viking gal says:

            I’m American born and bred. I have lots of cousins in ‘the old country’, so I thought I would write what you would understand. Considering your audience is an important part of communication, after all.
            I’m not claiming that we don’t have racism here. It is improving, but you can’t have improvement by hiding it under the rug. I’m also not claiming that we don’t have sexism, class-ism, etc.–those thrive all over the world. And I am a realist. But the US also is not the place which you are describing.

        • Naoyusimi says:

          Yes, I think it’s hilarious when Europeans (of all stripes) try to point the finger at Americans and say how violent we are, then have large-scale riots and kill people, all over “football” matches. I was shocked to read that alcohol is not allowed at these GAMES in Scotland, Serbia–I’m sure there are more places. Wonder why that is?

          • Default User says:

            True, when I was 10 my parents and I went to England for vacation, I remember the police were out in force and all the fountains had been turned off because Scotland and England were having a Football match, it was the first in several years, or at least the first to be hosted in London. I was very surprised that there was so much commotion over a sports game.

    • Rammkatze says:

      Considering the holocaust was more about race than religion and that the other two you mentioned happened centuries ago, it should be clear we despise the fanatism because we got rid of it so long ago. How primitive…

      • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

        This is all STUPID!!! Fanatics exist in Europe. Fanatics exist in the US. whoop-de-doo! We have proven that both everyone is a terrible person because fanatics exist everywhere!@@!!!!!111

    • DaDave says:

      You forgot the government backed religions in various European nations.

  20. Fred says:

    They’re too skinny…

  21. Falkus Kiber says:

    Unfortunately there are a lot of religious fanatics and selfish/ignorant morons here in the USA. In some places that picture is more or less correct. I can offer some of my family as an example (I try to avoid them).

    However, I would like to point out that you never see the nice, average American on TV. This is because generally normal people are not obnoxious, in your face jerks. They are way too ‘boring’ for the media to pay attention to them.

  22. n00bs says:

    Europe is being over run by muslims. That’s a religion. Just wait when they are the majority and start voting. Then we’ll see scary fanaticism.

    • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

      Nah, they tend to be second class citizens in most Western European countries. Don’t expect them to be able to be voting in mass too soon.

      • n00bs says:

        They are having children faster than the native populations, it is only a matter of time.

        • siobhan says:

          the chinese are faster… plus they don’t die (not in europe anyway, they prefer to go back to china for this… a fact I learnd some months ago and somehow found utterly funny)… but the best part of it… they do it with a smile. I’d sai… prepare america. for you don’t want to have to look at an always smiling europe… now do you?

        • Hierophantria says:

          You mean like Mormons and Catholics?

          Hello Kettle, this is Pot.

    • GD says:

      i don’t know what it’s like in america, but in europe you can vote regardless of your religion. so muslims already can vote

      i love how you say “muslims. That’s a religion”
      it’s not. islam is the religion, muslims are the followers.
      if you wanna diss someone, don’t use words you don’t know the meanig of

      • n00bs says:

        I didn’t mean to say they can’t vote now, but they will be voting in a majority in the next 20 years or so, then you will undoubtably have Sharia law in some form or another.

        • Shaz says:

          Apparently, we’ve got sharia law now anyway. It’s just that it’s only the Muslims who know about it unless it gets reported in the press.

          • n00bs says:

            It will soon be imposed on everyone, you have declining demographics and an influx of muslim immigrants who are out breeding you that will demand it, to put it bluntly.

      • coyoteman says:

        The first sentence in your post really made me LOL! :) I think that’s why there is so much hatred of America from others. They really know very little about us.

  23. Damn, where is my moonshine?

  24. shane says:

    give those men a gun collection and a few bibles and they look like the bush whitehouse anyway….

  25. wednesdee says:

    To the other Americans on this thread. It’s true, because of the idiots that make it to television and troll forums. We are inferior and fat. Not because that’s what we are but what is portrayed over the air waves. The problem is, the morons are the ones with the loudest voices.

    For the record, I am one of those fat americans who happens to believe in thier faith and ~gasp~ is a conservative and apparantly an idiot and have no clue on what goes on in the outside world. Oh wait did I mention I’m southern so a bigot and racist too!

    Gotta love stereotypes.

    • GD says:

      yes, being sarcastic will prove everyone wrong -_-

    • Rammkatze says:

      What exactly are you trying to achieve by claiming to be a stereotype?

      • Sqwirk says:

        Many americans get fat because the FDA is more corrupt (in the pockets of industry) than the equivalents in Europe. Because in America there’s that brain bug that all “government” is bad.

        Compare the ingredients for the exact same brand products in the Europe and the USA.
        For example, breakfast cereals. The European version will be low GI, the US version will be high GI. No wonder ppl get fat and diabetic.

        Sure you can say “don’t eat processed” food. Then only less wealthy ppl working long hours (the average american) will get fat and unhealthy… and tha’ts the American way, right?

        • charro says:

          It’s all about the profit.

          Wheat pasta is more expensive than the starchy empty carb stuff.
          Whole wheat 7 grain bread is more expensive.
          Bubbly fruit juice (instead of soda) is way more expensive than a 2 liter of high fructose corn syrup + bubbly water.
          High quality good cuts of meat are more expensive than spam.
          Organic, no MSG fresh soup is more expensive than MSG high sodium ramen.

          I make a decent wage, but I struggle to buy healthy groceries for myself.

          • n00b says:

            Demand is what drives price, there is obviously a higher demand for crappy food. If people would stop buying it, it would dissappear. It’s my opinion that more people need more education on what’s healthy and why you should eat it. But, it’s sooooo easy and fun to drive into a McDonalds and order off the $1 menu then to make up a big crock pot of food on the weekend and eat it all week…

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              Demand isn’t the only thing that drives prices. Overhead, labor cost, current supplies, government taxes/subsidies…

              So let me get this straight. You are endorsing a tax on unhealthy foods ;)

              • n00b says:

                Well, it wouldn’t bother me too much, I just don’t want more income taxes. I wouldn’t even mind a tax on consumption, if they did away with income tax! But that’s just me… I think education is the key though…

                • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                  Those are mostly fixed prices, but not necessarily. They do set a base price at which it is no longer valuable to produce/sell that product so demand does determine most fluctuations, but it certainly does not determine all food costs. If gas prices were to have kept increasing, it probably would have decreased the cost of local foods and products over mass produced/ foreign made products, for instance.

                  • viking gal says:

                    not to mention that sodas used to be in glass bottles, not plastic. And soda, beer and soup cans used to not be lined with plastic. And most plastics used in food containers in the US these days contain additives which have been shown to create insulin resistance (definition of type II diabetes and a major cause for over-eating). Most of those studies by the way were not conducted in the US…and 4 of the 5 relevant chemicals have been banned for use by the EU.

                    • n00b says:

                      Still, I have to insist, if people stopped going to fast food restaurants, they would soon close. They are not the only alternative to the poor, not by a long shot. People need to be educated on alternatives.

                      • viking gal says:

                        Depends on where you live. Most inner city areas, the only reasonably close sources of food are overpriced convenience stores and bodegas, and fast food places. A lot of the grocery chains pulled out of the cities due to concern about shoplifting.
                        In Boston a few years ago, it was a VERY big deal when a food store actually opened on one of the branches of the subway system. People were having to take a taxi, or shlep their bags from bus to bus to subway and then to their apartments.

                        • n00b says:

                          Well in those places it could be a problem, but that’s not a widespread problem for the country. Most big cities have enough grocery stores. Those kinds of problems needs to be dealt with on a case by case basis, imo.

                        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                          “that’s not a widespread problem for the country.”

                          Actually, yes it is. There are massive “food deserts” in all cities in the US. Reasonably priced grocery stores will not go in to these areas. These same areas are also “health-care deserts”.

                      • Default User says:

                        The people who go to the fast food places often work to many hours a day to have time for that education, and are to tired by the end of the day. Many of them work two jobs while trying to raise a family and just don’t have time to even go anywhere else or cook and so they grab fast food on their way home because there’s not much alternative as far as they know.

                        • n00b says:

                          As far as they know, which means they need to be educated. It doesn’t take much time to make a list every week, do some shopping and plan out meals for the week. You can always assign tasks to the children, it makes them feel special to help out.

                        • Default User says:

                          Well, you go explain all that to them, and many of them don’t have “weekends”. They work all seven days to be able to pay the bills and feed the kids.

                        • n00b says:

                          That’s just negative thinking, there is always time to buy food and make it.

                        • n00b says:

                          Wait… You’re telling me there are two parent families where BOTH parents work 24/7? Something is wrong there.

                        • Default User says:

                          Never said they were two parent families.

                        • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

                          In fact, they’re frequently not.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          That’s just negative thinking, there is always time to buy food and make it.

                          BwaHaHAhaHA!!! Riiiiight. When you get off one job at 5 and have to be at your second job at 6 in between? Really?

                        • n00b says:

                          Ok then, people don’t have time to feed their kids, what’s the answer? Geez. This is far from what the original argument was, there is plenty of food availiable in this country, plenty. If people aren’t getting it, then there is something wrong there that needs to be dealt with. But, I have yet to see on the evening news anyone dying of starvation in this country. There is plenty of public assitance, local food banks and churches. If kids are going hungry it’s not that the food is not available.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Well, my kids never went hungry when I had to do that, but it definitely precluded cooking a healthy meal at home from unprocessed ingredients….My point was that sometimes feeding your kids Taco Bell, or having them nuke frozen dinners (or make sandwiches, etc.) is the only viable option due to the time/money constraints; in other words, people aren’t necessarily giving their kids fast/convenience foods just because they’re lazy.

                        • n00b says:

                          Well, who ever said that? People were saying that kids were starving, you never let your kids starve, did you? I didn’t think so. Anyway, how can we all be fat if we’re starving? We aren’t, we may be eating cheap bad food though because it’s cheep and convenient, also it tastes better. That’s why I keep saying education.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Oh….I guess I got sidetracked by the nesting somehow. No, there’s no reason for any kids to be starving in the US; if you genuinely don’t have money for food, there’s food stamps (they even have an “emergency-track” for processing new applications for people in dire circumstances) and if the parent is selling the food stamps to buy drugs or something (far more complicated than it used to be since they’re electronic now, but yeah, still doable), the kids need to be somewhere else.

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          You obviously haven’t seen the studies which demonstrate the calorie-rich, nutrition-absent food is cheaper than home-cooked food, and contributes to the obesity epidemic, seen overwhelmingly–huh, funny that–in the poorest sector of Americans.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Huh? My kids aren’t obese….Did I miss something again?

                        • n00b says:

                          *sigh* Because they don’t know the alternatives. Beans and potatoes are not expensive, there are lentils and many types of greens, even some that grow wild. Much of this stuff can be bought in cans or frozen and are easy to fix and retain the nutrients. It also doesn’t taste as good as a big mac. I’m done.

                        • Default User says:

                          we may be eating cheap bad food though because it’s cheep and convenient, also it tastes better.

                          I…um..what? Tastes better?! No..it..I…my brain…you hurt my brain!

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Sorry, Diss. Didn’t make clear who I was replying to, but it was n00b. We’ve run out of nesting levels!

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          n00b: No. Not (in all cases) “because they don’t know the alternatives”. Did you read what I wrote??

                          Another point: Certain healthy foods are cheap, but then . . . do you realize how MUCH of certain things it takes to feel FULL on it? Lentils & beans are cheap, but for someone with digestive problems, they might be nigh-impossible to eat (as someone with migraines and IBS, believe me, I have dietary restrictions a mile long, if I want to feel “normal” or even halfway good), not to mention the cheap versions need soaking overnight (time-consumption)–but that’s not my main point. It’s cost vs. health. Whole grains bread – very good for most people = more expensive. Organic vegetables = more expensive. LEAN meats = more expensive. Even if one stuck to brown rice for a whole grain and cans of tuna for protein (of course, the best-for-you tuna would be solid white or solid albacore), one still needs fresh (or at least frozen) fruits and vegetables. Canned vegetables have had most of the nutrients removed (personally, I think they’re salty, mushy, and taste like crap), so that’s not the best option.

                          Point is, it’s not ALL about education. Or even time.
                          It’s the almighty dollar!!

                        • mabsba says:

                          I’m sorry, Nao, but I have to point out that after your year of tuna, you will probably have died of mercury poisoning. :)

            • Sqwirk says:

              Well that’s the problem.

              In the US you either cook from ingredients which is time consuming (unless you’re privillaged enough to have someone do that for you) or you buy pre-prepared food which is sold on price and often low quality.

              There’s no reason for the pre-prepared food to be as bad as it is. The exact same branded products are lower quality in the US vs overseas.

              The choice shouldn’t be between complete junk and cooking yourself.

              • n00b says:

                Once again, if people didn’t buy it, it would dissappear. But, people need to be informed. Also, cooking on the weekend and freezing left over portions is a good way to save time, among other ways. A can of bean already cooked or fozen vegetables have all the nutrients of making them yourselves mostly.

                • mabsba says:

                  Actually, most canned products have a lot of sodium in them, but you are correct in that you can make better choices and still save some time. But in terms of calories per dollar, the crappy food is the best deal, unfortunately. I cannot make four hamburgers for what the fast food chains sell them for.

                  (BTW, I don’t eat any of that stuff, but then we also have enough money so that our food budget is plump. :D )

                  • Sqwirk says:

                    It’s just sad really.

                    Average earnings are less in the US (and it’s even worse for median earnings i.e. what the middle class take home), it’s only the cheap food and fuel that make them nominally better off (if you put value in PPP figures).

                    • viking gal says:

                      And of course making food on the weekend and freezing it assumes that the person isn’t working overtime to make ends meet…and that they have room for a decent-sized fridge (rather than those bogus under-sized apartment fridges which I’ve had the misfortune to meet a time or two).

                    • n00b says:

                      No one is starving in this country, the right food is availiable at low costs too.

                      • mabsba says:

                        I think most people eat fast food for the price and the convenience, not ‘fun.’

                        And there are people starving in this country. Period.

                        • n00b says:

                          Why would there be? With food stamps and public assistance, unless they aren’t aware of it, or have have other issues. Who is starving in this country?

                        • n00b says:

                          I remember when I was worse off than I am now, I was living in a rural area and had to go to the local food bank, there was a lot of food available. I don’t know, things may be changing because of the bad economy now, it may get worse too.

                        • viking gal says:

                          Apparently lots of kids–they get free breakfast (high carb) and free lunch (ditto) at school, but often nothing on the weekends, and limited food in the summer. My evidence? My cousin who does food assistance in the summer for the kids he teaches during the school year.

                        • n00b says:

                          So the parents are not caring for them, it’s not that food is not available to them.

                        • n00b says:

                          …and that’s very sad, btw.

                        • viking gal says:

                          Yeah, sad. and not the kids’ fault, either.
                          Food banks up in the NE are reportedly getting seriously hit by the economy.

                        • mabsba says:

                          You said people are not starving here. That’s false. The discussion of why the children are going hungry does not affect the fact that they are. Your statement is still false.

                          The food banks and meal sites here all report having to turn people away.

                          And VG is totally correct that most children who get that very poor quality free food at school go home to houses with no food on the weekends.

                          Many are people who make ‘too much money’ to qualify for any kind of assistance, but barely can pay their basic bills. Some are just worthless parents who shouldn’t have had kids. Some have serious mental problems. Many are just people who were never taught by their parents how to budget, cook or any of those things we take for granted.

                        • n00b says:

                          Yea, I hear that, and I agree that we could be coming to a time when the poor WILL seriously be in trouble in this country. I hope not.

                        • n00b says:

                          Can you please point me to sources for that information? Because I have seriously never heard of that in this day and age with food stamps and public assitance, unless the parents are SERIOUSLY miss managing their funds.

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

                          If you haven’t heard, then you’ve not been listening or have been ignoring. The current consensus done by the salvation army is 1 in 8 people in America are struggling with hunger.
                          It’s not a well hidden secret. You should look into it.

                        • Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

                          Don’t get me started on school lunches VG, it makes me so angry I hulk out. I’m torn because I know that the majority of my students wouldn’t get breakfast if they didn’t eat it at school but they frequently serve a delightful entree that is called “breakfast pizza”. Want to know what breakfast pizza is? It’s freaking sausage pizza! For breakfast! Followed by a lunch of texas toast!

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Actually, Mabs, as I was posting it, I thought that. Canned tuna not one’s healthiest option.

                          There are lots of things that people thing are healthy that are not. I read an article just the other day … scary! I’m never eating another apple unless I at LEAST peel it (I should anyway–peels are supposedly bad for IBS), but still . . . organic would SEEM to be the way to go, yet those marked “organic” don’t have consistent standards, so–what to do? Sometimes I’m mystified by what I should eat.

                      • “No one is starving in this country”
                        You’ve lost it, haven’t you?

                  • n00b says:

                    Well, your right, the sodium needs to be watched but still better than fast food! Also, the chains probably buy hamburger in bulk (I hate to think of the quality of the meat, eww!) but we could buy about the same amount of hamberger and make spaghetti or chili and get more than four servings for the most part. It’s just not as exciting as going out for fast food, but everyone wants to be served every now and then, I understand the draw. It’s fun to eat out.

            • Charro God says:

              Well this is true, but it helps little if I’m in the minority protesting the crappy foods.

              Though I agree with you, education is the key to fixing what is wrong with this country. And not just nutrition wise..

              • mabsba says:

                Yes, noobs is being incredibly simplistic.

                But it’s hard to educate students who get so little at home: I remember being told as a volunteer at a childcare for homeless children that it was important to sit down and eat with the children because they NEVER saw that in their ‘normal’ life.

                Being disadvantaged is more than lack of money: it’s much more about someone teaching how to do laundry, shop, budget, cook…the endless list of tasks that most of us take knowing for granted. I am always so happy that I chose my parents so well. ;)

          • Default User says:

            Bubbly fruit juice (instead of soda) is way more expensive than a 2 liter of high fructose corn syrup + bubbly water.

            I prefer suger and water to high fructose corn syrup. For my birthday my dad brought me back a 6 pack of 500ml pepsi from Mexico. They use sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup. Tastes so much better.

          • My wife and I do eat a bit of fast food, but mostly we make our own meals. One conclusion I have come to, aside from the health aspects, is that meals cooked at home tend to also be more filling. For example, if we cook spaghetti I don’t have the desire to snack later on in the evening. But let me get McD’s, and within two hours I’m back at the pantry getting some chips, cookies, or anything else that fills the square. On top of all that, while cooking is time consuming, if you shop right it can actually be cheaper to cook at home.

            • Default User says:

              If you’re cooking from scratch it’s almost always cheaper to cook from home, unless you’re making gourmet meals with caviar and canapes. Vegetables and pastas are cheap, and you can buy a steak or chicken and cut it up to add to a meal rather than making it the whole meal. My mom likes to cook from scratch a lot. I made steak stew using her recipe for about 20 people for a camping trip and it cost about 20 dollars for all the ingredients.

              • Exactly! We like to have steak at least once a week, and if you compare a good porterhouse that you buy at the store (where you get to pick it out yourself) compared to what you get in a restaraunt, I’ll take the one I cook first. I’m not opposed to eating out, but one of my biggest issues is at home I know what I’m getting and how fresh it is.

              • Sqwirk says:

                I’m not saying you can’t eat healthily. Of course you can.

                There’s just no reason for pre-prepared and processed foods to be actually bad for you.

                • n00b says:

                  No, there really isn’t any, except people like the taste and end up buying fatty, salty or sugary foods over the healthy foods. If they stopped buying them, they would stop making them. The end.

  26. siobhan says:

    dang… and I always compared the us of a to hulk hogan. ;)

  27. KC says:

    And still, most people who want to emigrate and make their lives better want to go to “white, fat, racist, ignorant, religious” America.

  28. coyoteman says:

    You know, I have seen in forums, YouTube comments, etc., a great deal of anti-USA sentiment from Europeans and Canadians which reaches an almost hysterical pitch. Yet apart from forums such as this one, which address the matter directly, I see very little anti-European or anti-Canadian sentiment from the USA. I would estimate the ratio to be at least 20:1, if not greater. I believe that, to the outside observer, this says a great deal about which group has more civility.

    • Rammkatze says:

      It might be selective reading. You see, I see exactly the opposite of what you do LOL

      • Really? On just this site alone compare the anti-US sentiment with the the anti-Europe/Canadian sentiment. Take your blinders off and have a real look around. Any anti-European comment you read is a reply to a stereotype posted by a European/Canadian.

        And FTR, the only Canadians I really don’t like are the French variety. All other Canadians are ok in my book though.

        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

          Please don’t misunderstand my statements, I am not anti-American. I’m quite fond of my southern cousins. I just disagree with their decisions, and the direction they have been moving in as a nation. I do not presume to ‘know better’ than them how they should live, and while I may seem confrontational on the surface, it’s only because I wish to either better understand their choices or prompt them to truly consider whether those choices are beneficial.

          Oh and I think you’re pretty cool too Eddie.

          • Thanks GB the C. From the posts that I have read from you, I can say the same. I think Canada is a beautiful country, with exceptional people (except the French variety.. oh wait, I noted that already). The only problem I see is that Canada is still a part of the Commonwealth and I think that causes some internal conflicts with most Canadians. I think, like Australia, Canada would be much better off as a Republic with no ties to the Monarchy. But then again, that’s just my opinion and maybe Canadians like being associated with the Monarchy.

            • keithybabes says:

              Canada better off as a republic with no ties to the monarchy??? I think Britain would be too.

              • Yeah, but how are you going to divest yourself of the Monarchy? Where would they go? Although, I guess they could move to the Bahama’s. I just relish the thought of seeing Camilla in a thong.. Oh God, what have I just done?!?!

              • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                For us its sort of a non-issue. We don’t pay taxes to the crown, we have a Monarch in name only. Any attempt to exert power from the thrown would be laughed at and ignored. Our membership in the Commonwealth is merely an acknowledgment of a shared heritage with other Commonwealth nations and the explicit promise to consider the needs of the other Commonwealth nations in foreign policy decisions, something like a less explicit version of NATO.

                • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                  Except that whole appeal for dissolving Parliament not so long ago.

                  • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                    That was more a matter of determining the technicalities of the electoral process, and Canada specifically requested external arbitration in that matter. I do however believe this unholy obsession with a first past the post parliamentary needs to end. Our electoral system is overdue for an overhaul.

                    My personal suggestion is this, but I’m certainly willing to come to a rational compromise:

                    Municipal Government – Direct representative democracy, no change needed.

                    Provincial Government – Bicameral, one body elected first past the post, second body elected proportionally, leader of the Majority in the proportional body takes the seat of provincial executive.

                    Federal Government – Tricameral, one body elected first past the post, second body, 2 reps appointed by province after each provincial election, third body elected proportionally, leader of the Majority in the proportional body takes the seat of Federal executive.

                    • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                      Do all three federal bodies have to come to an agreement for legislation/ can each body veto legislation? Which body services as the national judiciary?

                      I get excited about these things. It makes me really happy that you have such a detailed prescription.

                      • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                        At the federal level yes, the three chambers would have to come to simple majority agreement. I see no reason to push federal legislation without broad agreement, however national budgets can pass with 2 chambers so long as the third doesn’t oppose with a 2/3rds majority.

                        I’m still working on the specifics for the Judiciary, but I’m thinking Executive appointment by with majority approval by the first-past-the-post and provincially appointed bodies.

                • Neither does Australia. But, and I’m not sure if this is true with Canada, there is a Governer General who is the representative for the Queen. I don’t know what power’s the position has, but it still says that the Monarchy has a presense here, even if it’s in name only.

          • Default User says:

            Wait, first we were your big sister, now we’re also your cousin?! Maybe this picture is more accurate than we first thought. :P

    • ay dios mio says:

      And judging from your “20:1″ I can see you have no idea about the statics you want us to believe are valid.

  29. Great says:

    That’s not really funny, it’s not very accurate, but judging by american replies here, you surely deserve to be treated that way :P

  30. As an Amrican, I can report that this is mostly true… I spent 20 years in Uniform, and was stationed all over, and I am ashamed of our citizens (but I still am proud of the Constitution).

    • Jeebus Crepes! says:

      As an “Amrican”… Yeah you cannot even spell it, so I refuse to allow you to speak for me. I am clean, educated, good genetics, and refined. You spent 20 years in uniform and are saying you are ashamed of the citizens you swore to protect. You are a pretentious bastard, and it is a shame that people with your mindset are left with firearms and entrusted to protect us. You are also ignorant, the Constitution was written SOLELY because the men in charge viewed the common man as the ones in the picture. I have traveled all over this country as well, and more than the piss poor areas our government invades to place Army bases in, and pictures like these, are very much the minority.

      • Rammkatze says:

        And your educated self never learned what a typo is? You are a pretentious bastard who purposedly knit-picks in an attempt to look smart.

        Yes, a european is standing up for an american, the world is coming to an end!

        • Your standing up for an “American” who is slamming and entire population. Yeah, you should feel proud of that..

        • Jeebus Crepes! says:

          Yes I know what a typo is, but I would imagine it best to to call our entire population the equivalent of what the picture portrays while making one. Also, my educated self knows you never begin a sentence with “and.”

          Try again…

    • Why are you ashamed of Americans? I’m ashamed of some of the things our government has done, as the way some idiots act, but your statement is just silly. I’m hardly a patriotic American, but I still think you’re full of it.

      • mabsba says:

        Well, I will admit that sometimes I am embarrassed at other Americans’ behavior in the same way one can be embarrassed by a relative’s behavior. You’re not responsible for it, but when someone asks, you still have to acknowledge the relationship. (“Yep, that’s my cousin pissing off the water tower.”)

        • Maxwell Silverhammer on set of the best tea party ever says:

          Well he better stop! Those water towers can be really mean when they get pissed!

          …..Oh… you meant… he’s going off the water tower… gotcha.

          • mabsba says:

            I couldn’t tell some of the really stupid stuff my cousins say because the moderators block the n-word. I’m blaming the genes on the other side. :)

            • Maxwell Silverhammer on set of the best tea party ever says:

              The English language is so much fun to use as a weapon of confusion… like how you can join a club… that goes to the club… and gets clubbed. So much fun…

              • mabsba says:

                Hey, no arguments from an English geek on that! It’s a great language to know…and a terrible language to learn. :) (I do a bit of ESL — English as Second Language — tutoring.)

  31. piere says:

    so true … typical american

  32. Rammkatze says:

    I’m confused. I’m European and I don’t think of americans like this. I thought that was the stereotype for the southern states only. *scratches head* That’s what the Simpsons taught me! :D

  33. UBERGRUE says:

    As somebody from Europe, I can say that this is not how the majority of us see the US.

    Apparently, the Europeans think 1920′s Alabama is the whole of the US.

  34. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    *feels a little guilty for agreeing with most of the Europeans that have posted…*

  35. Kelly says:

    actually, europeans know the us quite well… my boyfriend knows the us capitals better than i do and he is from spain. if anything, i think this is how the us imagines the south to be… and i suspect it´s true in the small towns.

  36. Najzero says:

    acshully, we think:
    - americans iz fat
    - americans can has guns
    - americans dun give a crap about the rest of the world

    • n00bs says:

      Let me match you stereo type for stereotype:
      - Europeans are dirty and don’t wash
      - Europeans don’t have good teeth
      - Europeans are sissies that run from a fight and hide behind the US skirt

      Hows that for stereotypes!? You see? You are acting just like the people in the photo you are judging.

      • Sqwirk says:

        Europeans think american have bad teeth full of fillings.

        But that having exactly straight and perfectly white (visible) is necesary in American society because of the lack of health care and social mobility. In the USA you can judge someones socioeconomic background by their physical apperance.

    • Chris says:

      acshully, that last one iz:
      - americans dun give a crap about the rest of the world, unless thay haz oil – then thays come and take it

  37. Texas says:

    nay that just form where bush form

    • VictoryNotVengeance says:

      Ironically, the use of the word “form” here is pretty funny. Because it gives the impression that those dudes in the lol weren’t merely born, but formed out of some lesser breeding pool. I also think that imagining Bush emerging from that same sludge is pretty funny.

  38. Skathrex says:

    @n00bs: Again “us Europeans” see the thing a little diffrent. Even when we say that invade Afghanistan was the right thing to do. In Europe its more or less a fact, that Iraq was because of the oil. And even if your point is valid, thats not even a reason to elect such a moron into office.
    This may be a little over the top, but last time germany elected a moron…well let me state it this way, things didnt go that well the next 12 years.

    • n00bs says:

      How was Iraq about oil? The price of oil increased for us! We didn’t get any oil, did you? Did anyone get the oil but the Iraquis? I don’t buy the whole war for oil thing, there isn’t any evidence of it. But beside all that, we didn’t elect GWB to go and fight in Iraq, we elected him to protect us and in the first 4 years it appeared he was doing a great job. He got a little weird in the final 4 years but how is that any proof we elected him out of hate?

      • Glasofruix says:

        Yeah, he protected you so well that your entire economy has fallen apart, nice work dubya.

        • n00bs says:

          Look, that’s not exactly my argument. He did start spending like a drunken sailor there at the end which is not good for the economy. Of course Obama is continuing it on a massive scale. But, my argument is that we DID NOT elect him twice out of HATRED, which was the contention of the poster I was responding to. So please, stick to the original argument and show how electing GWB was an act of hatred towards the rest of the world.

          • n00bs says:

            But now Obama, who is thought of well by the rest of the world, is not able to close Guantanamo anymore than GWB was able too. If holding these people in Guantamo is so bad, why don’t European countries step up and take some of them? And like I said before, most of our allies went with us into Iraq, they did find yellow cake in Iraq which is a WMD and it is well known that Saddam used chemical WMD’s on the Kurds, so how can they point a finger at us? Can you imagine how GWB would be villified if Sadam had WMD’s and they got into the hands of Al Quaeda or Hamas and they used them?

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              Yes, yes, yes. Guantanamo is slowly being closed and there are some prisoners who are headed to Europe.

              The argument about the Kurds really is an argument that if we were going to take over Iraq we should have done it under Bush the senior when we ‘truly’ had international support for our endeavor.

              I agree, had ‘terrorists’ somehow gotten their hands on WMDs from Iraq then Bush would have been blamed, but there was little reason to believe Iraq was going to do that. I will let you have the last word b\c I am really tired of arguing over the reasons for going into Iraq.

              My main point did not have anything to do with the war per se, it was that the re-election of Bush was interpreted as going against the international community by the international community, although his reelection had little to do with Iraq in the states.

              • n00bs says:

                Yes, I will agree with your last paragraph, because I know that the reelection of GWB did not have anything to do with a hatred of the outside world, but more of a desire to have protection from fanatics who were outright saying they wanted to destroy us. It was a frightening time for this country, that’s all.

              • Default User says:

                *passes BW a case of “two buck chuck” wine* Take a break, this wine needs some sampling.

  39. gobo says:

    This is absolutely ridiculous. If you really believe this then it says more about your foolish preconcieved assumptions about Europeans than it does about Europeans. One Lincoln rating for you, you earned it.

  40. typical american video says:

    • pa says:

      Didn’t see any fat people.

      • viking gal says:

        OK. Two things. 1) I have actually been to Toms River, NJ, and also to ‘Jenks’ (Jenkinson Beach, in Point Pleasant, NJ). The folks you saw in the video were pretty close to the appearance of what you would see on the beach at Jenkinson’s. The young people in that area of the country to not run to fat…until they’ve had a couple kids.
        2). The people in that video were certainly not representational of the average American (although I’ve gone to high school with SOME like that). They were chosen for being amusing, and willing to display their stupidity. (there is a whole series based on this concept–’stupid Guidos from the NJ shore’). Those people were also not representational of the average person from the central New Jersey shore. AND they were all A) media whores and B) drunk off of their butts.

      • Philip says:

        Get out of my head, pa!

        (oh, and also:
        1. No news pundits lieing all the time.
        2. No starvingly anorexic hollywood chicks filled with silicone.
        3. No mention of World War 2 or 9/11
        4. No explosions
        5. No guns
        6. Nobody’s getting sued
        7. No cars (let alone an SUV)
        8. No drunk college people
        9. No Christian signs/chants/gospels/churches
        10. No hippies
        11. No pot (over half of Americans has smoked pot. That’s a bigger % than in Amsterdam)
        12. Why the hats? We don’t think Americans have hats.
        13. Not one American flag or sign of patriotism.
        14. There aren’t even Muslims who are being oppressed (or having their countries invaded).

        So this is how (some or very few) Americans think Europeans think Americans are.

  41. Lone Wolf says:

    The south according to people who live in the south

  42. Soul says:

    Not true, there are no weapons and no black people clubbed to death by policemen.

  43. Skathrex says:

    ok first i didn’t say or mean you elected GWB out of hate. If it come out this way i am sorry, didn’t mean to. What i meant was that with GWB it started that “we Europeans” brag about America. I think it wasn’t that bad before GWB.

    And the Iraq Oil thing, well obviously it wasn’t about Sadam, and it wasn’t about Weapons of Massdestruction. So its just speculation but GWB and his government did this to have a better control over the oil resources. And for the gas price thing. Its funny how Americans keep complaining about it. You should be happy that your gas price which is that low. Over here in Germany we pay more than 3 times the price. When you would get rid of you big ass cars you would see that its not that bad.
    But lets not talk about this, i think there are so many points which America and Europe have totally diffrent views of. This would take forever

    • n00bs says:

      Ok, well thank you for at least admitting that our election of GWB was done out of hatred for the world is not true. And, yes we could go on and on about the oil thing and I don’t want to spend time on a Sunday morning. But, remember we did not go into Iraq alone, the free flow of oil is important to the entire world economy, not just US. Think about all the things we use oil for, not just for gas, but for heating and industry and the amount of things that petroleum is used for is huge. We ALL need oil, not just USA.

  44. Giggle says:

    I just love watching the Americans and Euros fight so much! You all get so defensive about the silly stereotypes there are.

    This caption has provided me many lulz.

  45. bodo says:

    As a native Californian, I’d like anyone in the US with a similar bigoted view towards my state to think about this (that’d be pretty much all of Idaho and Texas, and maybe most of the rest of the country between us and the Northeast). Is it that it’s only the other person’s bigotry that’s bad?

  46. Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

    Where would you be flying out of? Vayama .com is pretty good for flights between the US and the Europe.

  47. n00bs says:

    If I wasn’t so broke because of this bad economy I would send you a ticket! :)

  48. conte de fees says:

    Whoa, whoa people. Canadians, Americans, Europeans! We shouldn’t be fighting. We all have one important trait in common: we are awesome.

    Now, shall we all band together and make fun of another continent/country? What about South America? Brazil’s big, let’s all make fun of them!

  49. crystaltwylyght says:

    The majority of Europeans (that’s right, the whole continent) is still just jealous that we won the American Revolution. Guys come on, it was like, 200 years ago. I know the break-up was rough, but can’t we still be friends?

  50. crystaltwylyght says:

    The majority of Europeans (that’s right, the whole continent) is just jealous that we won the American Revolution. Come on guys, that was a long time ago. I know the break-up was rough, but can’t we still be friends?

    • crystaltwylyght says:

      Sorry for posting that twice

    • hmmm says:

      actually, that’s not true at all. I’ve lived in Europe, and Europe has a huge amount of respect for the revolution and views it in a very positive light. Even when the revolution happened, we had broad support in Europe. Even England was very split on the revolution DURING the revolution, with many prominant politicians supporting us.

      Our revolution was FUNDED by France and the Dutch, hello????! How about a little appreciation for the people who bought all our weapons and then gave us the money to rebuild our infrastructure, you POS. Now granted that was more out of animosity towards the British than love for us, but the fact is they still paid for our war.

      The American Revolution was a huge motivator for Europe, and was the inspiration for many of their own revolutions and for turning the monarchies of Europe into nothing more than figureheads.

      Read a book you moron. People like you and comments like this are exactly why some Europeans think that Americans are backward hicks as in the picture above.

      • paws4thot says:

        Sure, but that was France and the Netherlands prosecuting their on-going was with England by other means. An illustration of “the enemy of my enemy is my ally” in action.

        • Naoyusimi says:

          Paws, he said that:

          . . . granted that was more out of animosity towards the British than love for us, but the fact is they still paid for our war.

  51. mabsba says:

    Wow. What a really hate-filled thread today. It’s sad that we all only see each other through the incredibly slanted lens of the media and popular culture. Too bad we can’t all remember that the noisiest, most annoying people from another country or culture usually represent the smallest fraction of that place and a fraction that most of the ‘normal’ people who live there are embarrassed to be associated with.

    • FTR, I don’t have any hate for Europeans. The ones I know are good solid people and can’t say that I have any stereotypes of them. However, since I’ve moved to Australia, I can say that I have come across a lot of invalid stereotypes of Americans. The sad part is, most of those are from people who have never even been to America. I suspect the same is true here from those that are European.

      • mabsba says:

        Well, I certainly found that to be true when in Europe. The people with the strongest opinions usually had the least actual experience. One wouldn’t want to mess up one’s opinions with pesky things like facts! :D

        BTW, I wasn’t remarking to anyone in particular, just the general theme. I did notice that a few people tried to make polite and rational comments, but they were drowned out by the roar of stereotyping.

      • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

        I have actually found in Europe that some of the most hateful comments towards the US come from US ex-patriots and their friends. I have wondered before if many of the stereotypes come from people that have chosen to leave the states because of negative views of it.

        • Speaking from experience, I’m proud as hell to be American and despite some negatives, have encouraged people going to the States for holiday to try and get in as much of the experience as possible. One exception is I try and discourage people from spending too much time in L.A. The only reason I’m an ex-pat is that my wife is Australian and at the moment prefers to live here to be closer to her parents. But who’s to say what will happen in the future? I would much prefer to retire in the States, but if that doesn’t happen, so be it. I will continue to consider myself an American first and always.

    • charro says:

      Yeah, most of these conversations are just ridiculous. It’s sad that there is so much xenophobia and stereotyping going on.

      I see Europe as a magical land of rainbows and flowers.. Is that wrong?
      ;-)

  52. Sandgirl says:

    I don’t think we’re much wrong…

  53. UBERGRUE says:

    How can you not like the US? THEY HAVE CAPTAIN CRUNCH!

  54. SteelSkin says:

    Hmmm… not really. When I think of America as a stereotype, I think gun-wielding religiously fanatic racist white people.
    Other frightening american stereotypes include the gun-wielding gangstas, and of course the gun-wielding rednecks. Wait, did I mention that you tend to let potentially dangerous people carry guns?
    Of course, I know you aren’t all like that. Now if you excuse me, I have to grab my bike, to go eat my snails with red wine, camembert and baguette.

    • charro says:

      Hmmm.. Very true. It does seem we allow some dangerous people to carry guns.

      Can I have some red wine and snails?

    • conte de fees says:

      I have to say, I’m an American currently studying in France and the first I’ve ever seen a gun out (not like in a store window or a police holster) was at the Austerlitz train station in Paris. Like… big guns being carried by guards. I was unnerved for a second.

      not saying anything in terms of the truth of any stereotype, just an observation.

      • SteelSkin says:

        Yes, we have the Army in trains stations and airports to prevent terrorism. It’s called “vigipirate”, and it’s active since 1991. It’s meant to be dissuasive, hence the full uniforms and assault rifles.

  55. Pootah says:

    This is not how I view Americans.

  56. ObeyTheKiwi says:

    wel this is stupid.. becuz of a caption that isn’t even funny everyone is insulting eachother…sigh :o

  57. varenoea says:

    Haha, no, don’t worry. When Europeans hear “America”, they don’t think of a bunch of boozing redneck hobos.

    They think of cars that waste incredible amounts of petrol, of young people being deprived of sex-ed, of Fox News, of a desolate health insurance situation, of a much greater percentage of homeless people who are forced to live on the street; and they think of plastic surgery and of hotels that keep up huge meadows in the middle of the desert and thereby waste lots of water and energy. Oh, and of a country that has constantly been at war for the last, how many, 70 years?

    Don’t worry, nobody sees you like in that picture above.

    PS: European is spelled with a capital E.

  58. Lolnathan says:

    I always suspected this site’s readership was unabashedly Anti-American. And now I know for sure. Shame. The US is a great country with, in general, good friendly people.

    • whatcrap! says:

      America is the light of the free world, just hope that it doesn’t go out with all the dousing it’s taking from inside and out.

  59. Texas says:

    i imagine american like fat people

  60. Jeremy says:

    What I’m curious about is how do you people define the difference between a religious person and a religious fanatic? Some people call religious fanatics anyone who simply sincerely believes in and adheres to the teachings of a given organized religion, basically takes their religion seriously. I think this definition is unfair. Personally I think a religious fanatic is simply someone who uses their beliefs to enforce a violent, hateful, or forceful political or social agenda, i.e. the Taliban, the crusades, westboro baptist church, the young earth creationists, etc.

    • religious person, someone who lives their life accounting to a faith or teaching

      religious fanatic, someone who wants YOU to live YOUR life to their religious teachings or faith, and if you dont..they will do everything in their power to MAKE YOU…because thats what (insert deity here) wants…

      • I think that’s a fantastic definition. I would like to add, if you can’t say more than two sentences in a row without saying something about God, Jesus, or your deity of choice (when the subject isn’t religion to begin with) then you may be a fanatic (I sense a Foxworthy-ish stand up career based off this. Score!)

        • mabsba says:

          “You might be a religious zealot if….” *in proper southern drawl*

          • Naoyusimi says:

            I get sick of people thanking God every single time something goes right in their life. Oh, yes, you’re so special that God is tinkering around trying to make things go right for YOU!! I guess that’s why the globe is heating up and melting the darn polar ice caps. He’s busy making your little progeny score well on his history test! He’s busy allowing you to feel good you woke up again, today! I’m about to defriend these losers on FB that have to Thank God for being alive–like every day. My gag reflex is working overtime.

            • Naoyusimi says:

              ” . . . WHO have to Thank God” . . . ::grrrrr::
              ::walks away grumbling about being brought up and surrounded by hicks who can’t speak proper English::

            • mabsba says:

              What’s worse is when you go out of your way to do something for someone and his/her response is “Oh, thank god for sending you to help me.” Occasionally I have just freaking lost it and said, “I have freaking free will; how about thanking ME?”

              I am a bad, bad person, but I can’t stand that!

              • Naoyusimi says:

                Yeah!
                A little gratitude in the right direction goes a long way towards making good things happen again!
                (am SO not being sarcastic, but mine IS a double-edged comment, pertaining to my life; too bad the person who s/b reading it won’t ever.)

                • mabsba says:

                  I have (I really am a bad person) upon occasion, when someone does the ‘thank god I’m alive today’ replied with ‘yes, thank god for not killing me today.’

                  Bad, bad me. Now I have to go to work. Probably punishment from god for being bad.

                  • how come no one ever blames god when things go wrong?

                    well my dog exploded…guess god wanted it to happen..

                    • Default User says:

                      There was an Onion article on that a while back. The headline was something like “Family happy God has answered dying child’s prayer. Answer is no”

                    • mabsba says:

                      I have never understood that. My pregnancy went very badly at the end: I almost died and our son was 1#15.5oz, in the Neonatal ICU for 10+ weeks. He came out fine. People still say “You must thank God for saving your child.” To which I usually reply, “Then I would have to blame God for trying to kill him…and me.”

                      Yes, I know. I’m a bad person. But it’s tiresome to have people constantly project their religious beliefs onto you. Besides, I bet hell has all the fun people! ;)

        • dissimilitude says:

          What if I have days when I can’t get through two sentences without using some form of the work fvck?

          I think that may just mean I’m a little stressed.

          • mabsba says:

            Well, I think it means you need cookies. *gives diss cookies* All better now, see?

            • dissimilitude says:

              Cookies helps, thank you, Mabsba.

              Or should I just thank God for sending you with the cookies, hmmm? :twisted:

              • mabsba says:

                Well, I guess that would depend on whether or not you wanted to get more cookies! :twisted:

                • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                  So, a story that’s tangential to this discussion. On a very long 13-hour flight to Auckland, NZ, I was stuck in the middle of a group of missionaries who were going to bring the word of the Lord to those heathen Maori (or something like that – I couldn’t be arsed to find out the details). When the flight attendants brought us dinner, the one sitting next to me said “I would like to thank JC for this meal…” etc. So, under my breath and in Russian I said “I would like to thank Debbie, my flight attendant, from bringing me this meal and the bottle of wine, which I can use it wash down my Dr@mamine & pass out, avoiding any attempts of religious conversion that are sure to follow”. My evangelical seat-mate gave me a smile, thinking I was praying as well. I’ve never gotten more sleep on a flight before or since then.

    • mabsba says:

      I don’t know who ‘you people’ is, but I think there’s a gray area between the two extremes you mention. To me, ‘fanatics’ are those who are so convinced that their religion is right that they want to force other people to adhere to it, whether by violent means (eg Taliban) or political (Americans who want prayer in schools). The problem is that they never consider themselves to be hateful or violent or forceful because what they’re doing is ‘right.’

  61. bobzmoose says:

    Stop being jealous, Europe. Come over sometime and we’ll have some moonshine.

  62. RedNZ says:

    I’m not ‘european’ but that’s probably what I’d be described as by most americans. You know what? Most of the world doesn’t actually give a crap what americans are like, except when they project it on the rest of us.

    • But isn’t that true of most countries? I have heard that when Australians go out of the country they are viewed as insufferable, loud, obnoxious, drunkards, etc. However, that is NOT how the people actually are here. I would suspect the same is true of Americans. Get them out of their comfort zone and some just completely lose the plot and turn into people they wouldn’t otherwise be at home. Thus giving the impression of what has been displayed in the anti-American comments here.

      • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

        And those that don’t fit the stereotype either don’t get noticed as being Americans, Australians, whatever, or are written off as a ‘good’ American.

        • Default User says:

          Well, the problem the Aussies have is we can’t really tell the difference between the Aussie accent and the British one so we just automatically assume if you’re loud, obnoxious, and drunk you must Australian and if you aren’t those things you’re obviously British.

          • I’m pretty good at telling the difference between an Aussie and a Brit. Until recently, I had real difficulty in telling the difference between an Aussie and someone from New Zealand. The differences are subtle, but if you know what to listen for it’s that difficult. Alot of Aussies talk like either Paul Hogan, Russell Crow, or Steve Irwin (who is at the extremem end of Aussie accents – also called Ockers).

          • Naoyusimi says:

            Whaaa? DU, speak for yourself.

            I can tell. Aussies flatten out and elongate their vowels.

            It’s easy to tell. I’ll teach you.

            • Default User says:

              Well, the problem the Aussies have is we can’t really tell the difference between the Aussie accent and the British

              (yes I did just quote myself)

              When I said we I wasn’t including myself :P . I can tell the difference, but a lot of people I know can’t. Aussia and Kiwi is another matter though, simply because to my knowledge I’ve never heard a kiwi accent (Unless you count Heinreich the Somaon’s accent when we gets back from visiting family in NZ, but he tends to mesh a bunch of other accents in there to so it’s a bit hard to distinguish)

      • paws4thot says:

        Not in my experience, but then the sort of thing I’m likely to say to an Aussie is along the lines of “3 pints of Truddles’ Old Predictable and 3 packs of mixed crisps please?” ;)

        • keithybabes says:

          Ha! I swear the last time I was served by an Aussie barman (or NZ.. meh, who cares) and asked for a Coke, I swear to God he said ‘D’you want arse with thit’. I HOPE he meant ice…

          • Naoyusimi says:

            Yuck! No arse in mine, TY.

            And do NOT say that “meh, who cares” within earshot of an Aussie . . . or especially a Kiwi!! OMG
            Kiwi’s are a leeetle bit defensive about being mistaken for Aussies, in my experience. :D

  63. Jennifries says:

    As an American, I must say this is fairly accurate, however, all the people need to be at least 70lbs heavier (about 32kilograms for you Europeans), there need to be some religious protesters in the background, preferably with two separate and conflicting views, and we need some some misspelled signs to show us how uneducated everyone is.
    And now I’m sure someone will tell me off for being unpatriotic. :D

  64. Afterburner says:

    Penis.

    This discussion needed to be more lighthearted.

  65. guyom says:

    Actually as a european, i see this photo and think “this is Romania”

  66. angie says:

    hm, see, i saw this pic and said, ‘awesome. free booze.’ i think that may have even been the original message they were trying to send…

  67. Churj says:

    Woohoo for stereotype wars!
    So did anybody miss the point this was supposed to be a joke mocking the stereotype of what stereotypes europeans have?
    Also just sayin’, American media mocks European cultures all the time, and it’s perfectly acceptable. European media mocks American culture and it’s fine. Why doesn’t everybody just sit back and laugh at us Canucks for a while? We’ll even say sorry afterwards and give you a timbit.
    (It doesn’t bother us to get teased, because we’re still bigger than the USA)

    • mabsba says:

      Hey! The Canucks have doughnuts! Ummm…doughnuts. :)

    • All I want is one decent apology for Nickleback..

      • Churj says:

        For that I am truly sorry… But come now, plenty of worse has come from other places around the world.

        • That maybe true, but Canada singlehandedly brought Rock and Roll down so many notches with Nickleback there’s serious debate as to whether it can fully recover. The good news is, Bruce Springsteen is rumored to be opening The Boss’ School of Rock. Keep your fingers crossed that it’s true.

          • Churj says:

            I’m sorry to say, but I think another particular nation has to look at it’s own record before mocking another nation’s music. I mean, there’s a particular nations who likes to take young people with not talent and convince them they can be both music AND tv stars. Ex: Jonas Brothers, Miley Cyrus, Lindsay Lohan, Hillary Duff, Brittney Spears.

            Still sorry for Nickleback though.

            • None of the above claim to be rock though. Nickelback is a rock band. A terrible, terrible rock band (there are one or two guilty pleasure Nickelback songs I like, but I always feel dirty after listening to them).
              But our hands aren’t entirely clean, for a band called Styx exists.

              • Churj says:

                Actually, sadly, Hilllary Duff calls herself punk, and the Jonas brothers claim to be rock.
                Mind you, Green Day claims to be punk too. Don’t get me wrong, I really like their music… but it hasn’t been punk since slappy hours.

      • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

        We’ll apologize for Nickleback when you apologize for Eminem. By the way, what happened to that guy? Did he get shot, or did someone finally point out to him he couldn’t rap.

        • Default User says:

          We are exceedingly sorry for that monstrosity. If he hasn’t been shot already we shall see to it that it happens post haste.

          • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

            Likewise, we are truly and deeply sorry for Nickleback, Celine Dion and Alan Thicke. We offer as an apology BTO, and The Tragically Hip (we may throw in The Respectables, but so far they only have 1 hit in English, we’ll see how the rest turn out. Otherwise we’ll send you The Trews.)

            • Default User says:

              I suppose I should add (though it pains me to even acknowledge that these are ours) how terribly sorry we are for Britney Spears, Tom Cruise, the song “It’s a small world” and Scientology in general. I think I should also take this opportunity to apologize for Tila Tequila. Her very name has disgraced a proud and noble alcohol tradition.

    • Giggle says:

      Rofl are you serious? Ever heard of the song “Blame Canada”? There are so many pissed off canadians ranting on youtube about it it’s not even funny!

      • Churj says:

        For future reference: When angry trolling, do not use “1337-speak” such as “rofl” or “lmao” or anything along those lines. It results in people not taking you seriously (not that they would in the first place), and gives them something extra to mock about you.
        Also, when somebody is clearly trying to make the point that the trolling on a message board has gotten out of hand, and that people need to sit back and have a laugh… maybe it’s time you drink a real beer like Molson, rather than that watered down cola Bud that yanks seem to like.
        Anyway, I have a hole in the roof of my igloo, so I’m going to go patch it with moose turds and beaver tales now.

    • conte de fees says:

      nah, some of your fellow canucks are already mad at the americans. scroll up. I’m much too scared to mock the great white north.

      Speaking of timbits, thanks for Tim Hortons! And for playing hockey with us! You guys rock. :)

      • Churj says:

        Hehe we gave you lacrosse and hockey, and basketball was invented by a canuck as well (he just happened to be living in the states at the time).
        Just so you guys realise how much of an honour it is for us to let you have Tim Hortons, that would be like you guys building the pentagon in Moose Jaw. We love you guys enough to share that with you (it’s also kind of an apology for burning down the white house in the war of 1812… sorry about that by the way).

        • Naoyusimi says:

          You’re kidding, right? Lacrosse was invented by Native Americans!

          • Default User says:

            Native Canadian Americans?

          • Churj says:

            Yeah, the native tribes in modern day Ontario and Quebec (That’s in Canada). They also used to be days-long affairs involving all the men from entire villages, played across hundreds of acres. That’s a sport.

            • Naoyusimi says:

              But they weren’t Canadians; that’s the point.
              Did the Natives in the U.S. (tho it declared its independence in 1776) get treated like or considered U.S. Citizens? Nope.
              I really don’t think you can consider your Native Americans or First Peoples, or whatever you would like to call them, Canadians, not back when they were inventing lacrosse.

              So, there! :P ::ppfffbthh::

              • mabsba says:

                Besides, wasn’t there a great version of lacrosse in Central America in which they used the heads of the last losing team?

                • Churj says:

                  Heh, and in the opium dens of indochina they used to play a version of dodgeball with the heads of defeated enemy warriors.

                  First Nations people in Canada are Canadian citizens, and large parts of this country were built on trade and interaction with their tribes. They are just as responsible for the country that Canada is today as the Europeans that immigrated here.

                  • Naoyusimi says:

                    OY VEY!

                    I never said they held no responsibility for the country of Canada . . . I’m also pretty sure that had Western Europeans never invaded they would have been pretty happy with the way things were.

                    My point, ONCE AGAIN, is that they invented Lacrosse long before anything like “Canada” was a twinkle in anyone’s eye!

                    • Default User says:

                      Just because they didn’t yet know they were Canadians doesn’t mean they weren’t. In fact, it was very nice of the Europeans to come and educate the native people as to their countries name. :D

  68. Erik says:

    That picture isnt quite complete, it needs some drugs, guns and gangrape as well ;-)

  69. lotus says:

    The one on the left looks like a Baldwin

  70. L. says:

    Throw in some banjo music and pretty much, yeah.

  71. L. says:

    Calm down, Americans. You guys make fun of everyone else all the time. If you dish it you gotta take it :) lol

  72. Jules says:

    I don’t think about America that way. Only about half of the U.S., really…

  73. The Wanderer says:

    Am i the only european who imagines long, straight, sunny roads and big, loud, shiny Harleys when it comes to thinking about America?
    That, and MIBs.
    And Pontiac Firebirds.
    And fake California (huge) boobs, lol.

    I just would like to point that morons are spread all around the world, and “they’re coming outta the goddamn walls”.
    Plus, a large part of the first americans (except for the natives) were from Europe. So, let’s say, maybe i’m a far, far, far, far, far relative of an old woman living in… Arizona.
    And a guy living in… Springfield, Illinois, could be a far far far relative of a cute swiss girl.

    Anyway, we’re all far (far far far) relatives, on Earth.
    Our grand-grand-grand-grand-etc-parents were two pretty smart monkeys, it seems.

    …Now i’d like a banana milkshake.

  74. mabsba says:

    Okay, which of you said the naughty thing that was expunged, screwing up the nesting?

    (BTW, I know why you can’t say V1codin!)

    • Default User says:

      Don’t look at us! We’ve only said naughty things that haven’t been expunged! Would you like to join in? *offers Mabs a corset and a muffin

      • mabsba says:

        Sorry, I have to keep an eye on the cookies I’m making for my boys. Don’t want them to get burnt. :)

        • Maxwell Silverhammer on set of the best tea party ever says:

          Yeah, these muffins are drugged… for the… usual activities that happen at the tea parties… And as avid practitioner of the culinary baking art, I cannot condone my muffins being used to hinder further baking jobs….
          But here! *Hands mabs a muffin*
          This is a good one… and it has absolutely no ruffies in it!…. None at all…

  75. john says:

    Well, they are wearing shoes. So our reputation has improved.

  76. An Innocent Bystander says:

    Europe, and also Canada, South America, Australia, China, the former Soviet Bloc, any African nation that can afford a television, any race creed or culture abused by Americas regrettable deeds in the past or present, and Americans living anywhere the education system hasn’t ground itself to a halt trying to figure out that whole evolution hoo-haw.

  77. coyoteman says:

    775 posts and counting! This one sure paid the bills for the month!

  78. Starling says:

    Have the Merkins considered not taking themselves so seriously? Life’s much more fun that way.

  79. EuroDog says:

    “I’m not aware of too many things. I know what I know if you know what I mean..”

    Isn’t this their more recent anthem?

    “Americans” – what a joke. Oh, wait. You want to go back to the Moon again? Okay, we’ll send you a few more Europeans then… just like before.

    MuHAHAHAHAHahahahaha.

    Stop the drugs, go back to school, open your eyes – and I don’t want to hear about how you were abused as a child anymore. Tough, if you don’t like it. Hey, remember! — Stupid’s fun!!

    • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist Pastafarian says:

      *pats EuroDog on the head* There there, bitter little European. The next time you’re invaded, we’ll come save your ass again. If we’re not too busy. ;)

      • EuroDog says:

        Of course you realize the US came into World War Two late and the only real way it could find to stop the entire war (war in the Pacific) was by using a weapon developed mainly by Europeans and European Jews:

        Leo Szilard (Hungary), Eugene Wigner (Hungary), Rudolf Peierls (Germany), Otto Frisch (Germany), Niels Bohr (Denmark), Felix Bloch (Switzerland), James Franck (Germany), James Chadwick (Britain), Emilio Segre (Italy), Enrico Fermi (Italy), Klaus Fuchs (Germany) and Edward Teller (Hungary).

        Eh, hem… Education: something frequently talked about, but rarely demonstrated. (Best point above)

    • Clearly, you’re suffering from severe jealousy due to our mind-blowing awesome sauce that you ain’t getting.

  80. hmmm says:

    well considering that the far right has spent the last 6 months saying that anyone who lives under socialized healthcare is living in the equivilent of Nazi Germany, it’s understandable that they think that we’re all illiterate hicks. I lived in Europe and go to Canada all the time. It’s awesome. I mean, I like America just fine, but anyone who thinks Canada is Nazi Germany needs to a frontal lobotomy. It’s just too bad we sometimes get judged for what only a small and vocal minority are dumb enough to think. But most Europeanas I’ve met understand not all Americans are that dumb.

  81. Ignatz says:

    This looks like a typical weekend at my house.

  82. degoe says:

    not america, just the south

  83. Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist Pastafarian says:

    I’d like to apply for citizenship please! Can I crash on your couch?

  84. HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

    I was born and lived in several European countries. And my family chose to come to the U.S. and CHOSE to become U.S. citizens. You can say all you like about the problems of the U.S. but very few other countries offered my family the same opportunities and freedoms. Having lived and worked in Europe, Australia, NZ and South America, I can tell you that there are “rednecks” EVERYWHERE.

    • mabsba says:

      “Redneck is a state of mind.” Jeff Foxworthy. :D

    • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

      Does he color his hair blonde?? Cause that’s what it looks like. How very Nazi Youth of him.

      • Miss Fit says:

        LOL, yeah he does indeed sport the ‘exploded-yar-of-Hydrogen-peroxide’-look. Seriously, with carnival there are actually sold a lot of Wilders-wigs.

        The scary thing is- he’s actually quite popular here (and not only around carnival). When the day comes he’s succeeded in overthrowing our government, can I crash your place? :(

        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

          Of course you can my little Dutch dumpling. But things are not that much better on this side of the Atlantic.

          • Miss Fit says:

            *glomps* Thank youu~ I’ll be sure to bring a Wilders-wig with me, as a thank-you-present. It’s all you need in life, right?

            And you know what they say about grass and the other side. :) I really want to see America just once in my life – why not doing so when some Hitler-Jügend- twat has taken the lead here? Although I’m hoping that Holland will come to its senses a.s.a.p. and ostracize him for life or something. …Except when it’s Carnival of course.

  85. Justme says:

    Oh the irony…!

  86. RocketMetalWarrior says:

    Wow, this lol has a lot of comments

  87. Ash says:

    Ironically, this picture could also be titled ‘Everywhere else, according to America’.

    • slaggingham says:

      No.

      For instance, a picture of Europe according to Americans would be an image of the Space Hippies from the “Return to Eden” Episode of Star Trek.

      The Middle East, according to Americans, would just be a guy with a turban and a bomb. (Like in that newspaper cartoon.)

      China would be a headshot of Jackie Chan.

      Japan would be a screen shot of Sailor Moon.

      Canada would be a big picture of a polar bear on an iceberg during a blizzard. (Or a completely blank white image, same thing.) OR, conversely, a guy in a Cunning Hat jumping up and down and screaming “WE’RE NOT THE UNITED STATES!”

  88. typical american music says:

    • Miss Fit the DD Dutch Dumpling says:

      *is able to watch first 25 seconds*

      OK. This is WAY beyond what mindbleach and psychological help can fix.

      -goes to kitchen to gauge eyes out and cut off ears á la certain painter-

      Why can’t they do the world a big favor and be TRULY stupid in forgetting to open their parachutes. …Oh, wait, they have people who do the thinking for them. Now we’ll never get rid of them. *sobs*

  89. Pio the man says:

    At first glance, i thought it read “Europeans according to americans.”. Made me laugh. Right on target, as usual with punditkichen.

    Then i realised what it actually read. I guess the correct caption would be “Americans, according to americans trying to picture europeans’ point of view, as far as both their inferiority and superiority complex are concerned.”. C’mon people, the US aren’t victims. The “self-righteous imperialists” caricacture is actually way more vivid in the rest of the world’s mind than the hillbilly image.

  90. Tinky says:

    I don’t get it. We’re all a bunch of rural moonshine runners? Who get by without gubbamint assistance on our own resources?

  91. Donald Zerli, Patriot says:

    HEY EVERYONE!

    Just came in! Could someone fill me in on the conversation? Just give me a capsule version of, say, the first thousand posts.

  92. Lurch says:

    “Americans, according to..err, everyone”

  93. Chris says:

    If that’s America according to Europeans what on Earth does Europe look like according to Americans?!

    Oh yeh, they don’t realise it exists!

  94. Jaelle says:

    Meaning… illiterates? European spells with a capital E, last time I checked.

  95. Moko says:

    I took it as yanks being everything a hick is. Which you are.

  96. L says:

    This image is funny because its true.

  97. Soldierfish says:

    HAHAHA, in almost every american movie i have seen, the german people look like little nazis or wear leather pants and are drinking beer from 1l glasses. and now you are pissed, cause you realize, that its the same on the other side?

    you showed us many times, how small the average iq of an american is (i just say reelection of bush!), so why do you wonder, the rest of the world thinks of you as rednecks?

    Its endless amusement for me, to read your comments, go on and WHINE =)

  98. Hierophantria says:

    *cheers* Stupidity s a world-wide epidemic. As is xenophobia, ignorance, stereotyping, fanaticism, extremists, racism, and every other nasty thing. Can we just sit down, shut up, and try to actually see something good in someone else?

  99. Ptit says:

    Amen to that! People fail to see that we are alike, it doesn’t matter where you come from! The Americans who defend America on this blog only do this now as defense. I’m sure in real life they too complain about their county. And the same goes for Europeans, mutatis mutandis. It’s a vicious circle that never ends.

  100. n00bs says:

    You win the best post contest!

  101. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    I think people just need to get over the dotted lines on the map. That may have worked in 1400, but today you can get from any spot on the planet to any other spot on the planet in less than a days travel. Face it people, we are all in the same country now. Get over the differences, be a world citizen. The only number 1 is Earth. Now go make a positive impact.

  102. Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

    I like your randomly chosen Avatar. :)

  103. Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

    Agreed.

    btw- you have to change your email when you change names otherwise your avatar remains the same.

  104. viking gal says:

    Or you can go to gravatar and choose your own picture…

  105. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    Good points. And Germany is where the hottest music scene on the planet is, so at least you have got us whipped on culture.

  106. n00bs says:

    I just want to know, once and for all, what makes you think electing GWB, twice, had ANYTHING to do with hate. We had been attacked like never before on civilian targets in this country. We had every reason to elect a leader that we believed would protect us.

  107. Default User says:

    Ich Bein Gott! Ich bein ein Berliner! mmmm *noms own arm off* There, I have come back at you in German! Though I do recommend {http://learnyourdamnhomophones.com/} (Thanks Charro). It’s quite a useful site (I use it and I’m a native English speaker). Sorry, I just wanted to recommend t because you used the wrong threw. Not trying to rag on you about it just thought you might find it helpful.

  108. Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

    You have the same avatar as GD and N_M.

  109. Jane St.Clair for the recognition of Intelligent Americans says:

    Bitter wino is telling you to stop leaving your socks about the place. It’s the maid’s day off.

  110. n00bs says:

    lol! I noticed that too…

  111. Naoyusimi says:

    Good catch.

  112. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    What he didn’t wasn’t protect. What he did was invade. There is a difference.

  113. Oh for crying out loud. 9/11 =/= Iraq. No matter how many times Bush told you it was a war on terrorism, the Iraq war had nothing to do with 9/11. At. All. Geez. What possible link is there between the two besides some crap they made up to link Hussein to Bin Laden or Al Qaeda? Seriously. And we elected him before 9/11 so that doesn’t fly. His re-election is nothing short of a mystery to me. I figured him losing in 2004 would be a no-brainer. *sigh*

  114. n00bs says:

    He had a reason and had backing from the UN and congress at the time. The burden is on you to prove why he would want to invade Iraq for any other reason but to do his job which is to protect us.

  115. n00bs says:

    …AND we didn’t go alone either.

  116. Naoyusimi says:

    Oh, gods, not this again!

    And he really didn’t have much backing from the U.N., since the U.N. inspector, Hans Blix, said there is NO REASON to invade. Perhaps we strong-armed them a little later, I’m not sure . . . but still. Blix had it pegged!

    “Protect us”? From the Sept. 11th terrorists? By invading the wrong country? They were Saudi, after all, hiding and training in the Afghan-Pakinstan border region. Hmm, fascinating argument.

  117. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    Correction, he had UN backing for Afghanistan, not even the rest of NATO supported Iraq, the only NATO ally to join you in Iraq was Britain and that was only because you both thought the other had intel they weren’t sharing.

    The rest of us thought the existing UN operation would provide enough of a stop-gap to hold until Afghanistan had been dealt with… this is what happens when your ambassadors get something in their eyes when sharing intel… :)

  118. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    Not to be contrarian here VNV, but I think we still may be a bit to divisive socially to declare the ‘One World’ ideology to have come in to its own. If anything the unprecedented exposure we have to each other has made us more segregationist and exclusive. We stare in shock and horror at our fellow man and then try to build bigger fences… with nukes and missile shields.

    In time I do believe we will get over our current bout of xenophobia, and become closer knit as a species, but that is assuming we can survive the next hundred years without vaporizing life on earth.

  119. Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

    I had to do a double take earlier. I thought I was reading another GD post and noticed there was a different name at about the time he was about to get dirty with VG. I figured at the very least, I could help GD be more discrete. :)

  120. Maxwell Silverhammer in David Bowie's trailer on set says:

    “What ‘is theis the meaning of this!?’ Say your damn pronouns!”

  121. Default User says:

    No! I am very strongly anti-noun!

  122. Miss Fit says:

    OheMGee! Where? Be so kind as to provide this sex-starved European with the link, please.

  123. Default User says:

    {http://punditkitchen.com/2009/12/13/political-pictures-moonshiners-america-europeans/comment-page-1/#comment-282787}

  124. mabsba says:

    Didn’t Bill O’Reilly say that ‘sex-starved European’ was an oxymoron? :)

  125. Miss Fit says:

    All I can say is…

    …I want a muffin now.

  126. HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

    He thinks that “polyglot” = “polyamorous”. Fvcking maroon.

  127. Miss Fit says:

    O’Reilly said a looot of things.. actually, I’m suprised that there are still people out there who take him seriously. There’s a 2-minute-film made by someone who lives in Amsterdam as a response, though – click on my name if you want to see it. :)

    Mind you, this is not meant as a “See, the Netherlands are soo much better!”-film/comment, I don’t know for sure of those facts are the real deal either, but I believe that the dude who made this got his facts from some official source, so don’t shoot the messenger, please~

  128. mabsba says:

    Any source has to be better than O’Reilly. My father-in-law actually sent me “Bill O’Reilly’s Advice for Teenagers” for my son, so I expect a collective ‘poor mabs’ now. ;)

  129. dissimilitude says:

    Dare I ask what his advice for teenagers is? :shock:

    However, I do love this classic, classic O’Reilly moment from so many years ago. (“This fvcking thing SUCKS! We’ll do it LIVE!”)

  130. mabsba says:

    I do not know. My son put the book in the recycling bin. I have such a smart boy. *beams with parental pride*

  131. Miss Fit says:

    *dies from laughing* :’D Ahh, priceless~

    “WE’LL DO IT LIVE!!”

    Do [i]what[/i] live, Billy-boy? *winkobvioussexualinnuendowink* .. sorry, that’s my Dutch sex-deprived self speaking here.

  132. Miss Fit says:

    Ohh, you’ve taught him well! You can be proud indeed. Now who said that Americans don’t care for the environment again?

  133. Aw, why did you do that? Now what are you going to use when you run out of toilet paper? ;)

  134. Naoyusimi says:

    :D
    Keithy! Thanks for chiming in! Yes, that’s what I thought.
    Hmmm, maybe I really am better at world accents than most Americans . . .
    Tell ya the truth, tho … I THOUGHT I was good, until I had to turn on subtitles for “Snatch”. I think I did it for “Layer Cake”, too. LOL

  135. Well would it make you feel better if I said I find it hard to distinguish between American and Canadian (unless you get them lined up next to each other)? But at least I can understand them after years of exposure to US movies…

  136. Naoyusimi says:

    The main way to tell? Get one of them to say one of these words:
    1) house
    2) about

    If it comes out “hoos” or “aboot”, then you’re dealing with a Canadian. We’ve got several regional accents, but I don’t think any of them use that pronunciation. :D

  137. viking gal says:

    Also 3) boat.

  138. Default User says:

    polyglot = polyamorous!? *picks up foreign language books and begins studying*

  139. Default User says:

    That is awesome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up