Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


1 divided by 0?


mitt romney

1 divided by 0? I didnt mean for you to take the sign literally

(Mitt Romney)

We’re taking this sign seriously.

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Aqpwod via Our LOL Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 194 comments

  1. gmc360 says:

    ummm…why are Mormons so whack?

    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

      PK users

      My native country Haiti has been ravaged by that earthquake yesterday. I have family living over there right now who I’m worried to death about. Please keep the country in your thoughts and prayers.

      I may be going over there next week to help, so you may not see my comments for a while. As always; peace, love, & God bless.

    • JB says:

      gmc360, A wittier and more relevant initial response here would have been “First”.

      • gmc360 says:

        BJ is very witty for a Mormon.

        • JB says:

          I imagine if I were Mormon, that might true. It still may be true (but more likely is not because ‘brevity is the soul of wit’ and I’m never brief) even given my actual religion.
          What amuses me is how you toss around the word “Mormon” like there is some inherent evil in it and expect I will be offended by your assumption that I’m Mormon. I’m not. All the Mormons I’ve met are truly good, kind and intelligent people. Even if I don’t agree with their beliefs entirely, I can still appreciate them as individuals.
          Your ignorance and prejudice is repugnant and the source of most of the world’s problems.

          • Default User says:

            An interesting aside, although I strongly disagree with the teachings of the LDS, more so than most other brands of Christianity, and have never actually met a Mormon myself(or at least not knowingly as most people don’t introduce themselves with their name and religious affiliation), everyone I know who knows Mormons describes them as being incredibly nice and polite, I can’t think of any other group that would be described that way.

            • froofrou the fierce says:

              My b-i-l has said that according to the research he’s read, the Mormon charitiesare where you want to donate if you intend on as much of your dollar getting to the people in need. I think he said 97 or 98 cents of every dollar goes to helping people. With other places like the Salvation Army it’s something like 70 cents or less, with the worst being that one with Sally Struthers begging you to feed the children in Africa. I think less than 30 cents goes to those kids.

            • mabsba says:

              Eh, I have met Mormons who were total a$$es, but no more than any other group. In many areas the only Mormons people meet (that they know are Mormons) are the missionaries, and they are incredibly nice and polite. SInce they have a motive for being so, however, I think that is not exactly a valid sample.

              • gmc360 says:

                No evil in the use of the word Mormon, it is all ridicule. Cherck yer sniffer. You realize exactly where on the interweb you are right? Not prejudice …. not the source of the world’s problems. Religious nut jobs AND those with sticks in their asses cause most the problems around here.

                • Danbala says:

                  Did you just post this reply to the wong post?

                  • Default User says:

                    I’m impressed you can decipher it enough to come to the conclusion that it’s in the wrong spot. I can’t quite understand what he/she is trying to say. For example, why does he/she want to check my nose? I’m fairly certain he’s ridiculing Mormons, not calling them evil, but after the that the post just deteriorates….

                    • Danbala says:

                      I think gmc360 is seething with anger and therefore using that particular writing style (“incoherent rambling” as the technical term is) in response to:

                      What amuses me is how you toss around the word “Mormon” like there is some inherent evil in it and expect I will be offended by your assumption that I’m Mormon./…/Your ignorance and prejudice is repugnant and the source of most of the world’s problems

                      • gmc360 says:

                        Guess I gave you some of folks too much credit. I always thought the folks around here were witty AND smart.

                        Note to self – no more shorthand, spell everything out else confusion reigns and groupthink ensues.

                        • Default User says:

                          It was the poor grammar that did us in. The fact that you had replied to the wrong person also made most of it seem to be mad, incoherent, ramblings. I still can’t understand why ones nose would be helpful though.

                        • Danbala says:

                          “I always thought the folks around here were witty AND smart.”

                          Indeed. So the failure in communication might have had something to do with how you wrote that post?

                        • mabsba says:

                          Well, since your post appeared to have nothing to do with my post that you replied to, I’m not sure why you’re blaming everyone else for failing to understand you. Less rambling would help also. ;)

                          BTW, remember Poe’s Law. People write such insane stuff TOTALLY seriously that you have to put a little smilie or in some other way indicate you’re joking otherwise readers have no way of knowing.

          • Dexeh says:

            Oh snap!

  2. The Prophet says:

    But it’s a simple question! The answer is-

    *The fabric of space and time is shattered*

  3. Sqwirk says:

    lol he looks like a throwback from the gene pool

    seriously, how did somone that freakishly fugly become a candidate?

    • JB says:

      Obviously, you are one of our great minds.

      • Sqwirk says:

        You can’t deny that’s one ugly dude.

        • JB says:

          Actually, yes, I can.
          What I CAN’T deny is that I strongly believe your eyeglass prescription needs an update.

          • Sqwirk says:

            I think you’re the one with vision problems.

            I mean politicians aren’t exactly eye pleasing at the best of times but seriously this guy is freaky creepy looking.

            • Sqwirk says:

              My first thought on seeing him (?) would be to call the cops to check the sex offenders register. It’s amazing he lasted as long in the race as he did.

              • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                closet ‘mo

              • n10bettes says:

                That’s a bad picture of him true, but he’s a very attractive man. I’m curious about why you think he’s creepy looking…

                • viking gal says:

                  I’m curious also. I didn’t vote for him when he ran for governor here, and have disagreed with most of what he did and said as governor (saving the Olympics does NOT prepare one for governing), but never have heard of anyone being creeped by his looks. Usually menfolk rave over his hair, and women are either attracted or ‘eh, he’s good looking, but…’.
                  So please, enlighten us!

                • Default User says:

                  Can’t say I find him in the least bit attractive. I think his face is just a bit long, but well, um…I don’t think how he looks should have anything to do with his running for president. I’m also not about to call the cops to see if he’s a registered sex offender. He’s not attractive, doesn’t mean he’s molesting kids.

                  • Danbala says:

                    Looks shouldn’t have to do with it, no, but iirc there are statistics showing that the taller and/or better looking candidate almost always wins, or something like that.

                    Can I be more vague and more lacking in the department of giving sources? Sure I can, given time.

                    • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                      the main basis for this was a the kennedy/nixon debates. people who heard it on the radio said nixon won in a landslide… people who watched it on TV said kennedy won in a landslide.

                      years of research (including by one of my insane comm professors) showed that the (main) reason people thought kennedy won on TV was that he was handsome and filmed well while nixon generally looked disgruntled and was sweating and hadn’t done makeup or anything.

                      and no, i don’t have a cite… i shredded all those research papers and everything after that class was done (looking at the affect of different media on people’s perceptions of “reality”).

                      • Danbala says:

                        I’ve heard of some research (though I can’t say what level of significance it might have had – for all I remember it could have been Leno’s “Jay Walking” ;p ) that was more recent. Like Bush/Gore-recent, at least. Too bad my memory is only surpassed by my fact research stamina when it comes to suckiness. ;p

                        • Nebton says:

                          If you go to Google Scholar and search on “attractiveness electability” (without quotes), you’ll find many, many hits.

    • Sara says:

      So looks is a factor in how one becomes a candidate? Is that why you vote? Lord help this country..8(

      • JB says:

        Sara,
        Sure!!! That’s the thrill of living in America! Our destiny hinges on the whims of a willfully ignorant citizenry.
        Think about it: Had the poster’s shallow candidacy standards been applied in 1860, this would be a very different country today.
        Moral: Teach your children well. Then teach them to educate themselves!

  4. bogo says:

    lol, 1/0 = +∞

  5. Jaida says:

    1/0= -∞

  6. Cuddlee says:

    *LMAO* I consider this caption a Win just for its nerdiness ;)

    • Sesoron says:

      I doubt this counts as “nerdiness”, because nerdiness implies knowledge of an academic field, whereas this implies ignorance of one. If the joke is that Mitt’s too stupid to know that anything divided by zero is infinity, then it gets credit for being on-point but not for being terribly funny.

      • Danbala says:

        Anything divided by zero is infinity? You’re thinking of the specifics of calculus with some limes operation then?

        • Danbala says:

          Umm. I guess it’s not “limes” in English. “lim -> 0″ stuff then. :p

          • mabsba says:

            “Limit” is the word you’re looking for. :) *math geek to the rescue* Oh, shoot. My son took my cape again.

            We read it as: the limit of one divided by n as n goes to (or approaches) zero is infinity. :)

            • Nebton says:

              Ah, but only if n approaches zero from the positive side!

            • Danbala says:

              Thanks! I’ve repressed all memories of English calculus terms. ;p

              • mabsba says:

                You and most the students I taught — usually the day after they learned them! :)

                • Danbala says:

                  Generally it was a matter of “about 30 seconds after the exam was done” for me. ;)

                  • mabsba says:

                    But then they pass and go away, so that’s okay! Otherwise their parents call the university and complain. (Seriously, PARENTS of ADULT students.)

                    • Danbala says:

                      Poor (adult) kids. :/

                      (I would have denounced all kinship with my mum had she done anything like that. :p )

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        Well, you probably actually did your work and passed your classes, too! The only reason I feel at all sorry for the kids is because their parents are really hindering them at growing up and taking some responsibility for their own lives by hovering like that.

                    • Nebton says:

                      Yes, when did that start? It wasn’t that way when I was an undergrad (oh, so many decades ago).

                      • mabsba says:

                        I bet it was. :) I recall one incident in 1986 (grad school).

                        My husband’s cop friend pulled over a young man (early 20s) for speeding. When he got up to the car, the man held up his cell phone and told the cop to ‘talk to his dad.’ Hubby’s friend explained that that was NOT happening. Many of these young ‘adults’ seem to expect their parents to step in AND for it to be effective. NOT.

                        (Whereas my kid was aghast that I spoke to his math teacher about his grades when I ran into him in the parking lot at school. Poor, abused child. :D )

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Funny, that worked very well for one of our local politicians’ early-20s-aged sons. ;-) Well, in his case it was “Talk to my mom…” after he’d wrecked his vehicle with some weed in it.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Well, I really meant “NOT” with regards to this cop friend. I don’t doubt that with the right connections, we have enough corruption here that he would have received some serious pressure. ;)

                        • james says:

                          wow u must be realy smart! u went 2 grad school! and u told us all about limits!

                      • Nebton says:

                        Well, I’m Georgia Tech class of ’90 (BS Phys), and I wasn’t aware of it happening at the time. Of course, I wasn’t a professor or even a TA, so I suppose I’d have no reason to be aware of it as long as my parents never tried to embarrass me like that (and, bless them, they didn’t).

                        • mabsba says:

                          I only knew because one of my students’ parents called the dean (the DEAN!) to complain about her darling’s math grade. Fortunately he thought it was hilarious.

                          Now I understand some colleges have to have sections just for dealing with parents. I wonder what they call them? Helicopter defense systems?

                        • Nebton says:

                          By the way, I should point out that I can be considered an expert on parenting. I’ve never had a single child who didn’t earn a Nobel in one field or another…

                        • mabsba says:

                          Null sets don’t count for parenting points. :)

                        • FaileV says:

                          I think it is happening more often, but not at a significant rate. I think it’s mostly there is that trend of super over protective, never punish the kid, always be their friend “parents.”
                          I’ve seen a few freshman like that while in college, but I tend to avoid freshman like the plague. I can’t stand the “I can do anything I want now” mentality.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Well, as the parent of a hs junior, I know that at EVERY college fair we go to, the introductory speaker talks about it. As do the college guidance people. So it’s happening enough for that to happen.

                          And colleges hiring people just to deal with the problem sounds significant to me. (We gets LOTS of college stuff due to aforementioned junior.)

                        • FaileV says:

                          fair enough. it must be in certain areas. i haven’t seen it that much here, but this is Montana and the locals are a bit more self sufficent than others (not always) and i doubt we’re on the helicopter radar for schools

                        • mabsba says:

                          And it sounds like you are a student, yes? It’s not really something instructors would talk about to other students (due to privacy issues and not wanting to encourage more of the same).

                          Unfortunately, it’s far from being just freshmen. :)

                        • Nebton says:

                          FaileV: I think it’s also a matter of what you’re able to observe. As a student, you’re not going to witness the same stuff that parents and teachers witness.

                        • Nebton says:

                          mabs: Q8<

                        • mabsba says:

                          Hey! Nebbi thinks I look like Pamela Anderson! Nothing fake here, fella. :D

                        • Nebton says:

                          Movie form:
                          Q|-<
                          Q{-<
                          QΞ-<
                          Q≡-<
                          Q=-<
                          Qx-<
                          Q/-<

                        • Default User says:

                          Now I understand some colleges have to have sections just for dealing with parents. I wonder what they call them? Helicopter defense systems?

                          Anti-aircraft missiles.

                          Also:
                          Q:-< and the lopsided Q;-<

                        • keithybabes says:

                          Q-l-E :twisted:

      • keithybabes says:

        What about 0 / 0?

        • Jean-Philippe says:

          Same as 1/0, but smaller.

          • Andrew says:

            Much more controversial, 0/0 is
            0/anything is zero
            anything/0 is undefinable
            anything/itself is 1

            • Nebton says:

              0/0 is clearly 2.

              Proof: Let y=2x/x. Obviously, y is always 2. As x approaches 0, y is still 2. You can even approach 0 from the negative side, if that’s the way you swing. Y is still 2. Ergo, 0/0 is 2. QED.

              • keithybabes says:

                Or indeed, QE2.

              • Default User says:

                But what if y=3x/x?

                • froofrou the fierce says:

                  You dirty pirate hooker! How dare you inflict math on these poor, unsuspecting people!!! A pox on you!!

                  • Default User says:

                    I’m a clean pirate slut. I don’t accept money for that sort of thing and I bathe regularly (which is no easy feat on a pirate ship out at sea). Oh, and Nebbi started it!

                    • mabsba says:

                      Technically, I believe the person who created the lol started it. Nebbi and I just encouraged it. Totally innocent. (Especially as I didn’t point out the minor flaw in Nebbi’s ‘proof.’) ;)

                      And DU is NOT dirty. You stop that, Froo. Didn’t they wreck the pirate ship in a previous lol? I’m sure that would wash them down nicely.

                      • froofrou the fierce says:

                        Ok fine, she’s a clean slut of indeterminate origin with a pox.

                        Happy?
                        :-)

                        *goes on about her business, hating math all the while*

                        • Default User says:

                          Ok, which one of you gave me the pox? And if I have it then the rest of the regulars probably have it by now too.

                • Nebton says:

                  How can y be 3x/x when I told you to let it be 2x/x?

                  Sheesh. Some people just don’t understand proper math etiquette. And mabs, I resent the implication that there’s anything wrong with my proof. I ended it with QED, didn’t I?

                  • viking gal says:

                    My calculus teacher translated QED as ‘quite easily done’. Ah, good memories! (my linear algebra teacher however? NOT good memories!)

                    • mabsba says:

                      Calculus geek joke (that’s probably redundant): the limit as calculus grades go from A to F of Engineering is Business. :)

                      (I taught at a university that weeded out 2/3rds of its freshman engineering students via calculus.)

              • Um, I’m confused. If y=2, then wouldn’t x/x=1, thus making 0/0=1? Math sure is paradoxical.

                • Nebton says:

                  Ah, but you can’t cancel out the x, because it’s zero. So, no. 0/0 is 2. That’s my story, and I’m stickin’ with it!

              • Mr. Logic says:

                Not to rain on your presumably sarcastic parade, but you forgot to divide by the two. If x=0, then y does equal 2. But that is for 2x/x. Get rid of the two, and you get 1= x/x. Sorry, I’m a math freak.

      • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

        It’s not ignorance, it’s absurdity. Would you be complaining about ornithology if the captioner had instead made the tired “what is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow” joke instead?

        And yeah, you might want to crack open a textbook for a little refresher.

      • PortlandMark says:

        Did they change basic arithmetic since I was in school? ANY number divided by zero is “undefined”, since any number multiplied by zero is zero. Otherwise, EVERY number divided by zero would be infinity, no? Does that mean infinity comes in diferent sizes? (Actually, it does, but lets leave that for another discussion)

      • Nebton says:

        As others have pointed out, the question of what is 1/0 depends entirely on context. In standard limits terminology, if 0 is being approached from the positive side, then 1/0 approaches infinity (which is not to say it equals infinity). If it is being approached from the negative side, then it approached negative infinity. In general, it’s undefined. In standard programming terminology, 1/0 = NaN (not a number). There are no doubts other contexts (e.g., sub-fields of set theory) where it equals something else entirely.

  7. Mervyn says:

    My math teacher tried to divide by zero today, he’s so old, it’s funny!

  8. Igetstabby says:

    He’s more man than most.

  9. Meh says:

    Hey guys, don’t thrash my guy and I won’t thrash your guy, Obama or Mccain, or girl, Clinton or Sarah Palin. Thanks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up