Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


If ignorance is bliss



teabagger

If ignorance is bliss, this woman must be in a constant state of orgasm

(Teabagger)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Viv via Our LOL Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

You May Like:

» 338 comments

  1. oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

    Hahahaha! Dhoti it’s for you!

    • oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

      Oh wait, I mean FIRST! Ordinal me!

    • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

      The Dhotī or Doti in Hindi, called Dhotiyu in Gujarati, Suriya in Assamese, Vaytti or Veshti in Tamil, Dhuti in Bangla, Dhoti or Kachche Panche in Kannada, Dhotar, Angostar, Aad-neschey or Pudve in Konkani, mundu in Malayalam, Dhotar in Marathi, Laacha in Punjabi and Pancha in Telugu is the traditional men’s garment in Indian subcontinent. It is a rectangular piece of unstitched cloth, usually around 7 yards long, wrapped around the waist and the legs, and knotted at the waist.

      In northern India, the garment is worn with a Kurta on top, the combination known simply as “dhoti kurta”, or a dhuti panjabi in the East. In Tamil Nadu, it is worn with an angavastram (another unstitched cloth draped over the shoulders) or else with a chokka (shirt) in Andhra Pradesh or jubba (a local version of kurta). The lungi is a similar piece of cloth worn in similar manner, though only on informal occasions. The lungi is not as long and is basically a bigger version of a towel worn to fight the extremely hot weather in India. The sarong is another similar item of clothing.

      • See, this is why you can’t trust wikipedia — it actually means “he who fights tigers”. (+1 Internets for anyone who gets the reference.)

        • oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

          Look over there! *steals Dhoti’s internets and runs away giggling*

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          Change in topic, but wanted it high up:
          We are all geeks here, what is people’s take of the New Cpt America comic book pretty much making fun of Tea Baggers, or tongue in cheek calling them racist?

          I personally don’t think that Politicizing needs to be in Cpt America (put in Graphic Novels). To Cpt America is both liberal or conservative, b/c he represents America, not “liberal” or “conservative” America. If anything he would be against any of the “petty” bickering we do.

          • paws4thot says:

            That’s fair, and with a “name” book like Cptn America I’d agree. There is a place for politics in graphic novels (see V [for Vendetta]) but they need to have original characters and stand alone from the “real World”.

          • Ivan The Patron Saint Of Shortright & Pastafarians says:

            My take is this; So it’s partisan. So what? It’s ok to be partisan when the Repubs are in control, but not when the Dems are? The writers are obviously liberals, and they still have the right to express themselves. Free speech. You know, that thing you conservatives like to squawk about?

              • Ivan The Patron Saint Of Shortright & Pastafarians says:

                Well, you ARE a jerk. I never met your knee though, so I can’t tell if it’s a jerk as well. ;)

                • That’s what you’ve got? Really? Go back to screaming “dissent is no longer patriotic” or whatever.

                  • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                    To be fair Dhoti, I don’t recall a Dem calling Republican dissent unpatriotic per say… hypocritical, ignorant, narrow minded, and selfish perhaps, but I don’t see many Dems going for the unpatriotic angle… I have been known to miss these things from time to time though. I am a dirty furriner after all.

                    • Sadly, it’s a common theme here from whichever party is in power. The administration or the party never says it directly, of course; they rely on their flacks to get the message across. For example, a NYT columnist calling McCain “the unpatriotic opposition”. It’s not an isolated incident.

                      I’m just enjoying the irony of Ivan, who champions forcibly silencing people who are even just a tiny bit religious (except for liberals), suddenly championing free speech and the unfettered exchange of ideas.

                    • SoldierB says:

                      Green Beard,

                      I’ll give you that they haven’t used the word “unpatriotic”. Instead, they’ve called the tea party activists Nazi’s, an attempt for “mob rule”, and several other names. They didn’t use “unpatriotic”. Instead, they labelled with words that people associate with unpatriotic. So, no, they didn’t SAY it, they just super strongly IMPLIED it.

                      Of course, there WAS an “unamerican” comment by Pelosi, but I guess we’ll skip that one.

                      • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                        I’m certainly not arguing that it might be implied, just never used explicitly. Semantics and all…

            • Nebton says:

              Of course the writers have the right to express themselves. I just think that it’d be better for the comic book if they kept to more universal themes (as ILPB suggests). I know this might be controversial amongst us geeks, but Lucas had the right to use Jar Jar Binks to ruin our memories of Star Wars. That doesn’t mean it was a wise decision or one we should applaud.

            • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

              i don’t think a widespread “comic” of any sort should be that partisan… liberal or conservative. had it been spouting conservative ideals i wouldn’t be thrilled either.

              but as a point of clarification, i’ve never read capt america… so i’m not sure if it’s always had a partisan lean to it. based on the title alone i think it should be smack down the middle though, no matter the affiliation of the writers.

              • CX316 says:

                Captain America used to have issues where people were writing in to Marvel telling them that they expected Cap to either be A) Over in Iraq bashing down doors and beating up terrorists, or B) Standing on street corners protesting against the patriot act, depending on the political views of the people writing in. This is the reason they killed Cap off in the first place. They just happen to have brought him back at a time when he and the other mainstream avengers are the “underground” resisting against H.A.M.M.E.R’s hardline control of the US. This means that as such, Steve has come back as a very much liberal character, but once Dark Reign is over, he’ll probably go back to straddling the fence again, or he’ll quit his role as Captain America like he did during ‘Nam.

                • Default User says:

                  Feh. He should have stayed dead.

                • PortlandMark says:

                  One thing only: Captain America has always had a strong moral component to his story line. There may have been a time when those morals were non-partisan (during WWII for instance), but I would argue that the current story lines, as they have been conveyed to me in news articles, are only considered partisan because one party has completely lost it’s moral compass in some very glaring areas. Seriously, do you see Captain America torturing prisoners? Supporting warrantless wiretapping? The old Captain America held to a set of morals that the right wing in our party currently believe they follow. The left, of course, found him shallow and jingoistic.

                  I’d love to see the conservatives in our country move back to good old WWII era values again.

                  • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

                    My reply keeps getting eaten — part of the vast left-wing conspiracy, I’m sure — but the gist was me laughing at your characterization of right-wingers when Obama is seeking warrantless wiretaps of cell phone triangulation information and stepping all over the Fourth Amendment.

                    I doubt this concerns you, because just like it was only “torture” until Nancy Pelosi signed off on it, it’s also only warrantless search as long as it can be blamed on a Republican.

                    • PortlandMark says:

                      Well, thanks for confirming for me that you are incapable of disagreeing without being disagreeable.

                      In truth, Obama’a continuation of warrantless wiretapping was one of the first things he did that really bother me. He’s also being shady about releasing White House visitor logs, and generally *not* rolling back the vast expansion of executive power Bush II initiated. I’m not surprised, but I’m very disappointed.

                      Re: torture. I’ve always been opposed to it, just like I’ve always opposed invading nations by choice. I don’t understand where Pelosi enters the equation at all.

                      Finally, if you weren’t so cowardly and unpleasant, you would gave read my post in the PK group yesterday expressing my disappointment with the Obama administration over cell phone tracking. But then, we’d all find you’re just an empty suit, wouldn’t we?

                      • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

                        Typical — rather than owning up to your ingrained hypocrisy and moral cowardice, you blame it on the big, bad messenger. Are you going to threaten to report me to the admins again for telling the truth?

                        So, let me get this straight: when it’s a Republican performing warrantless searches, you rant and rave and protest and complain about the evil “right wing” for the next decade. But when a Democrat does it, you (allegedly) post weakly worded comments of dissatisfaction on an anonymous Internet forum — and even then, you have to be called out to do it.

                        Morally bankrupt nutroots like you make me physically ill. I can’t believe my vote counts as much as your rubber stamp.

                    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

                      “Obama is seeking warrantless wiretaps of cell phone triangulation information”

                      HE IS?! HOLY CRAP!!! That’s straw that breaks the camels back for me. I’m joining the next Tea Party protest and voting Paul/Kucinich in 2012.

                      (not sarasm, I honestly didn’t hear about this.)

                    • librise says:

                      ah conservatives….
                      don’t want any goverment so that no one will find about their affairs with prostitutes and homosexuals and all their other{read in hick accent} uhn chrissstin’ laaak behayvyuuur.

            • R-A-N-D-O says:

              Well, Ivan, as we all know, the Republicans know what’s best for us all, so it’s actually a very good thing if they are partisan. It keeps the dirty liberals from spreading their evil across the country. Now, partisan is a terrible thing because if the liberals get their way, then the country will become more LIBERAL! And then the entire country explodes.

              • froofrou says:

                Well, Rando, as we all know, the Democrats know what’s best for us, so it’s a very good thing if they are partisan. It keeps the dirty conservatives from spreading their evil across the country. Now, partisan is a terrible thing because if the conservatives get their way, then the country will become less entitled. And then the entire country explodes.

                • PortlandMark says:

                  *snerk*

                • R-A-N-D-O says:

                  I see what you did there.

                  • Default User says:

                    You’re both wrong. As we all know, I know what’s best for us all, so it’s actually a very good thing if they are partisan. It keeps the dirty politically minded from spreading their evil across the country. Now, partisan is a terrible thing because if the politically minded and politically indifferent get their way, then the country will become more POLITICAL! And then the entire country explodes.

                    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

                      No Default you’re wrong.

                      It is I, da GANGSTA who knows what’s best for us all, so it’s actually a very good thing if they are partisan. It keeps the dirty bustas & wankstas from spreading their evil across the country. Now, being a wanksta is a terrible thing because if the bustas get their way, then the country will become more WANKSTA. And then the entire country explodes.

          • Nebton says:

            Prepare yourself…

            I agree with you.

            • Default User says:

              I agree as well, though I feel compelled to point out that Cpt America was born of propaganda.

              • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                It kinda makes sense that comic books would have a strong partisan leaning. Superhero’s being the embodiment of a rather specific moral framework would tend to take up very specific causes and fight hyperbolic, almost satirically, extreme instantiations of their real-world-equivalent ideologies.

                The fact that every aspect of life in America seems to get categorized in to left or right wing politics would tend to make it nearly impossible to avoid coming off as partisan attack.

                • mabsba says:

                  Why, you, you…wait a minute… *uses right-left thermometer to check GB* It just keeps showing C? What the heck is a C doing on my thermometer?

                • Brak the Asgardian Zappaist says:

                  Just as an aside, have any of you guys ever read Preacher by Garth Ennis? An absolute tour de force. The most amazing comic run ever.

                  • Default User says:

                    I’ve read some of it, but haven’t had time to really get into it sadly. It was very good from what I did read. Though my favourite comic line of all time is always going to be Sandman.

                    • Brak the Asgardian Zappaist says:

                      A friend lent me the whole series in TPB. I sat down to start it and didn’t get up till it was done…sucked me in that hard. I’m casual with Sandman but what I’ve read is VERY good. I’m also very partial to Deadpool…and the last two or three runs of Hulk have been amazing.

        • Abc says:

          If that is what it actually means then you might want to tell all the other web sites, including the Indian ones. It would appear only you seem to thinks it means this. Please give 1 site that can verify your claim that it “actually” means “he who fights tigers”.

    • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

      I was going to do one on teabagging, but there was too much to fix for the censors….. :D

    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

      Okay I was just on Facebook because I haven’t been there for like 2 weeks and I have a bunch of Farmville gifts.

      But I need some help. I have NO IDEA what I’m doing on that thing! How do you play that game?

  2. rhine of the rhino says:

    Jesus needs tea bags? Are they decaf or regular?

  3. bodo says:

    I thought the whole tea-thing was about money? No? It’s about religion? Did Obama steal my religion? Or he’s going to? Wait, he’s going to tax it, is that the deal? I’m so confused.

    I started trying to figure out how she was going to actually teabag someone, but I found myself unable to go very far down that path (mental images and all).

  4. Schmoe says:

    “Tea”: legalize it! Now!

  5. Abba Dabba says:

    If ignorance is so blissful, why are Obama voters and liberals in general such a miserable bunch of whiners? Considering some of the stupid $hit you people say, you really shouldn’t be making fun of other people “ignorance”
    IE: global “warming” is real, you can tell by the 3 feet of snow etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc
    I’m still waiting for all you religion haters to say what you say about Christians and Jews to the religion that wants to kill you…all of you, especially the biggest liberals who are dumb enough to defend them.

    Bush spent money, Bush BAD, Obama spends 5 times as much in 1 year, Obama GOOD….you’re right, ignorance is bliss.

    • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

      HOW, we got a troll clean-up here on aisle 4. Could you please take care of this?

      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

        *claps gleefully*
        I get to use my M1A! I get to use ILBPs present! Yay!

        *blows ignorant conservatroll with RPG*

        Hey Andy, I made sure the head was intact for what little brains you can get.

      • bodo says:

        I don’t know, I think we should examine it in its native habitat first. It seems to be claiming that the woman isn’t displaying any sort of ignorance, but rather than providing a cogent argument to support this, it is simply lashing out using ridiculous, out-of-context rants in a sort-of ad-hominem fashion. Quite fascinating, really. I think perhaps it’s a lesser Blue Hills mountain troll, or possibly a forest troll of some kind, but I could be way off (not really my area of expertise and all).

      • jean jeannie says:

        LOL!

    • Global warming is real! The cause is obvious to anyone who is willing to look.

    • Danbala says:

      Heeehehehe. No, sorry, your troll attempt fails. When you go that far into trying to appear stupid, it loses any credibility.

    • Eddiepscetti says:

      SILENCE! I KEEL YOU!

      You’re making those of us here that ARE conservative look like raving lunatics. Please take your spooge elsewhere you basement dwelling crotchwaffle.

    • Rando is annoyed with the voting says:

      Any other liberal stereotypes you want to bash? Aren’t we all commies or something too? And all the Muslims want to kill us? I’ll make sure to ask my coworkers to spare me. I didn’t know they’re all trying to kill me. Go figure. As for global warming, you go ahead and believe whatever you want to believe. The planet doesn’t give a fvck if you think it’s happening or not. Just because it still snows doesn’t mean it’s not happening. I guess the entire planet has to be a sauna before dipsh!ts like you will believe anything.
      As for comparing Bush to Obama, I’m not thrilled with Obama’s first year, but I’ll still take it over any given year under Bush.
      Enjoy your fear mongering, but know this…
      No one cares what you think. But it is fun to rant at you sometimes.

      • FaileV says:

        They can’t help it. They’re playing checkers while the world plays chess. If they hear warming they expect deserts ignorant of the fact that weather has so many factors that slight change has it screwed up one way or another.

        • Rando is annoyed with the voting says:

          Global climate changes are way too complex for most of us to even begin to understand, and when someone is already hellbent on not believing it, they’re not even gonna try to understand it. And I’m sure the likes of Beck or Limbaugh aren’t going to understand the first thing about it.

          • semperfidd says:

            I’m still waiting for the mini ice age that was predicted by these same scientists 35 years ago. I don’t think there are many people who dispute that there is global climate change (funny how it is now climate change and not global warming now). The debate is if it is caused by humans. To ignore that global climate change is not politically motivated is stupid and if as you say it is way too complex for most of us to even begin to understand, then why do you believe in it? Because Al Gore said so? Or because the UN said so?

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              Technically the long term trend is warming, but near term effects are… erratic at best. Global Warming, as a term, sets an unrealistic expectation that short term variations in weather will always tend toward the high side. Climate Change is a vaguer term, but is less likely to cause confusion.

              The fact that humans are having a measurable impact is not contested in any real way, it’s the extent to which we are influencing it. Conservative estimates (not the political grand standing, or fringe science) show almost negligible impact but may be overestimating the self-regulatory mechanisms, many of which we don’t understand very well. More drastic estimates suggest our impact will rapidly overwhelm many of the self regulation mechanisms, so these are also likely wrong.

              And as for the mini-ice age… if the closest thing to a scientific journal you are getting your information from is Scientific American, or National Geographic, then expect to get fleeced regularly by fringe/pseudo-science.

              (And for the love of the flying spaghetti monster can we please stop letting Gore keep inserting him self in to this, that man makes me want to loose my politeness…)

    • wicket's ebil twin says:

      We stupid liberals defend your religion just as much as we’d defend a Muslim practicing their’s. And when big business wants to screw you out of your best interests IE-poluting your backyard and your children’s future), we’ll still be on your side…even if you’ve already been tea-bagged into being on their side. And when a “conservative” President runs this country’s economy into the ground, us liberals will still be here to clean it up. Call me names all you want, it makes you seem pity, unreasonable, and without an ounce of creditibility.

    • N/A says:

      Global warming causes greater snowfall. Crack a book, cure your ignorance.

      • froofrou the wuss says:

        It causes more snowfall, less snowfall, colder winters, warmer winters, colder summers, warmer summers, bad hurricane seasons, mild hurricane seasons, indigestion, weight loss, anal seepage, watery eyes, and congestion.

        • dissimilitude says:

          What she said. *nods*
          Also, remember, guys, if global warming causes you to experience an erection lasting longer than 4 hours, call your doctor immediately. ;-)

        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

          In short yes (as least on points 1 through 6). Nature in all its forms is far more complicated than any one human being could possibly understand. We in most cases won’t see what the final outcome is going to be until we are dealing with the aftermath. What models we have of global warming scenarios are built mostly off proxy data since the last major warming period most people were more concerned with surviving than recording the effects, and most probably didn’t even realize the climate was significantly warmer.

          The anthropogenic side of things is even less well understood. Current models suggest that it will amplify the effects, though to what degree is indeterminate. So yes if it was going to be a warm winter due to natural warming then it will be an even warmer winter. If it was going to be a bitterly cold winter, then it will likely be even colder than expected, or possibly colder at lower latitudes and warmer further north, or possibly the complete inverse of what is expected.

          *goes out to sunbathe in his quite pleasant 40 °F temperatures*

          • froofrou says:

            It’s the anthropogenic side of things that pisses everyone on my side off. We’re not denying climate change. Of COURSE there’s climate change, any idiot can see that. How much and what direction is up for some debate, but it’s there. The science on climate change is shaky and is in no way definitive, and man-caused climate change is virtually non-existant.

            Especially considering the rather large chunks of data that have been thrown out due to “irregularities” in the last couple of months, I’d say that running around screaming “ZOMG MAN IS KILLING US!!!” is a bit premature. I’m all for safer, cleaner, better ways of doing things, but let’s not shut down life as we know it over something that we’re not sure of. Please?

            • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

              (side note, I’m not arguing this out of malice so please don’t misinterpret my statements as a personal attack)

              No data was thrown out, the emails in question were investigated yes, but independent investigations have cleared the findings. What has been cast as scientific misconduct by the opposition is a fairly standard practice when presenting data to the public. While the loss of significant chunks of original samples shows an unacceptable level of due care and competence, the meta data has proven sufficiently verifiable by independent means.

              No one who has actually read and understands the claims believes man is solely responsible for what is happening only that we are amplifying the problem. The main problem in the climate change debate is not the science, its the hyperbolic fear mongering. I understand why it’s being done. People react far stronger when they are being told New York will be under water in 20 years than when they are told the coast line will recede by several yards over the course of the next 100, but putting the worst case scenario out there without clearly stating there is a significant level of uncertainty is clearly not the right solution either.

              This should not be a matter of debate just because there is a significant level of uncertainty however.

              Allow me to illustrate with a thought experiment. You go to sleep one night and when you wake up you are in the African Savannah. Clearly you have every reason to believe you are dreaming. You notice there is a rhinoceros charging at you. Do you ignore the potential danger, under the reasonable assumption it is a dream, or get the heck out of the way as quickly as possible on the off chance it’s not.

              In the climate change issue the causes are quite clear, it’s the effects and what constitutes a reasonable response that are debatable.

              • froofrou says:

                Second side note, it wasn’t just the emails I was referring to. I heard a couple of weeks ago that the science used to give Al Gore and his research team a Nobel Prize was either made up or deeply flawed, and has been tossed.

                • froofrou says:

                  And I didn’t think you were arguing out of malice…..I didn’t think you were arguing at all. Merely presenting an opposing viewpoint and backing it up with your evidence :-)

                  • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                    In my world there exists this thing called an honest and respectful argument. They’re actually quite enjoyable when you get the hang of it. :D

                    As for Gore, indeed, his research team has taken more than a few liberties with the facts, and for making the science a political issue I will forever curse the ground he walks on.

                    • froofrou says:

                      I like your world. It’s very similar to mine :-)

                      I think that if the global warming nut job crowd really wants to be taken seriously, they need to kidnapp Gore and duct tape him to a pike to be paraded through the city.

        • WorldsTallestMidget says:

          …and occasional lower back pain.

    • forge says:

      The only person I see whining right now, is you, sizzlechest.

  6. Nerill says:

    Sorry, I think I missed physiology class, but shouldn’t she be clam-dipping for the J-guy?

  7. gmc360 says:

    I like how she spelt everything right.

  8. typical 4 jebus says:

    dear america enjoy your redneck and lol … typical american

  9. ViiStar says:

    Luke 20:25
    “Well then,” he said, “give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and give to God what belongs to God.”

    Matthew 22:21
    They said to Him, “Caesar’s.” Then He said to them, “Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that are God’s.”

    Mark 12:17
    And Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they were amazed at Him.

    IE – PAY YOUR TAXES!
    EPIC BIBLE READING FAIL.

  10. Lllll. says:

    …either a “photoshopped” or a found “photoshopped” image…both possibilities stew in contempt…

  11. Ash says:

    Are there any points for spotting that the caption to this picture is a quote from the radio show ‘Old Harry’s Game’?

    -Ash

  12. MM says:

    It is NOT ignorance!

    • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

      But….IT. IS. SPARTA!!!

      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

        I don’t know, I think the old lady’s a bit chunky to be from Sparta. Besides I thought in Sparta once they reached 35 they were fed to the Spartan Childran in training… or was that Socialists?!?!? :-)

        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

          No, that’s “Soylent Green”.

          It’s not a woman, it’s an old dude. He’s a shamed old man because he didn’t die in battle, fighting for the glory of Sparta. So, he was cast out & sent to the U.S.

  13. HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

    Off topic but I need to verify something with the Canucks on here:

    Do you seriously have a Sasquatch as one of the Vancouver Olympics’ mascots???!!!

    • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

      Uh….no comment. :D

      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

        That’s awesome!! You’re takin the piss, aren’t you!!

        • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

          Of course. ;)

          • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

            The Canadian OC was sitting around:

            “Dude…you know what would be hilarious…uhm….


            duuuddddeeee…
            …oh…yeah…
            You know what would be hilarious and soooo awesome…
            A hockey-loving Sasquatch as an Olympic mascot.
            Right?…Right?…Can you see it, dude?
            It’s not even a real animal. Biggest joke on the rest of the world!…
            High five, dude…High five…
            …Do we have any D0ritos?”

            • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

              Damn, it’s like you were actually there! :D

              • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                You’ve seen one pot-filled “planning” session you’ve seen them all. ;-)

                • VOC Spokesperson says:

                  *ahem* The Vancouver Olympic Committee denies emphatically the salicious rumours currently spreading on PK that the committee members were engaged in the use of illegal substances during the meeting to choose the official mascots of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics. Any and all indications to the contrary are vicious lies spread by those jealous easterners who wouldn’t know good pot if it bit them on the a……*ahem* I mean, spread by those out to discredit our fine committee.

                  On a completely separate note, the VOC is making an appeal to the makers of Doritos and Reese Peanut Butter Cups to become the official suppliers….um, sponsers of the VOC.

                  • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                    *claps, giggles*
                    Brava.

                    I’m super ticked off at the network for being sh*t-for-brains idiots and not broadcasting the US vs Canada men’s hockey game on NBC. Feck ice-dancing! I want hockey, dog-gamnit!!

                    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                      HOW you have my deepest sympathies, I’ll be sure to come on and let you know tonight what the score was when we’ve finished butchering your team ;)

                      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                        Listen you syrup-sucker, I don’t need your charity! ;-)
                        (I’ll be watching the game on MSNBC but I’m livid that NBC is such a bunch of morans that they’d broadcast icedancing rather than what is the equivalent of the NHL all-star game!)

                        • viking gal says:

                          I’m still mad at NBC for not showing the final competition of women’s handball as promised, back in 2004. I know, I know, women’s beach volleyball is hot. But I wanted a chance to watch my father’s favorite sport with him, just once. And now it isn’t possible. :(
                          That has rather taken the glow off of the Olympics for me, permanently.

                        • PortlandMark says:

                          Ice dancing has females in scant clothing, hockey is a minor draw for most of the USA. NBC may be promoting pedophilia, but I think they know their audience pretty well. Myself? I’m listening to public radio during pledge week rather than watch the Olympics. Until the luge competition comes on!

                    • Nucky the Official Booty Wench says:

                      You can watch it at my house. :) But you know, you’re going to lose…… heehee

                      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                        Silly Nucky. If you and I were at your house we would not be watching hockey. :twisted:

                        • Nucky the Official Booty Wench says:

                          Ooooo….would we be doing #5 on your list? *claps hands*
                          :( But I have to work tonight.

                        • Default User says:

                          Ah! But it’s a pity the copy machine at your work has broken down *runs in with baseball bat and smashes copy machine, pulls out sharpie and writes “Acme Copy machine repair co. inc. llc.* But not to worry, I know an excellent repair service and they should have one of their technicians arriving any moment! Why look, here she is now!

                        • Default User says:

                          edit *finishes smashing copy machine and then runs up to HOW, pulls out a sharpie and writes “Acme Copy machine repair co. inc. llc” on her shirt*

                    • dissimilitude says:

                      Waitwaitwait, seriously?

                      NBC….always finding new ways to p1ss me off.

                      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                        Yes, seriously. Can you believe that??!!! Ice DANCING (not even figure skating but ice DANCING!) will be on NBC and the hockey game will be on MSNBC. F*ckers!

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Ice dancing….how is that even a SPORT? Gah. (Yes, yes, I know it requires skill and physical ability blahblahblah but so does effing ballet and that’s not a sport either!)

                        • Nucky the Official Booty Wench says:

                          I love you guys! :D

                        • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                          I suggested turning hockey fighting in to it’s own sport and getting that added to the list official Olympic sports, but no one seemed interested.

                        • viking gal says:

                          Ballet is an EXTREME sport. The women put pads in their toe shoes so that the audience won’t see the BLOOD!
                          /rant
                          But yeah, it should be hockey!

                        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                          @GB – I would pay to watch ice hockey fighting as a separate sport. What a great idea. Heck, thanks to NBC we in the US may have to pay per view to watch ice hockey.

                          VG – I’d rather watch ballet than ice dancing.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Okay, now I have to stand up for the ballerinas. They have the highest pain threshold of any athlete. I remember reading about the Prima Ballerina for the New York Ballet dancing for half a season with a hairline fracture in her ankle.

                          You can now resume talking about that ice thingie. :)

                    • oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

                      Hey, I like Ice Dancing.

    • Nucky, the Official Booty Wench of Asgaard says:

      Okay, I looked it up for you:

      Miga is a snowboarding sea bear inspired by the legends of the Pacific Northwest First Nations – tales of orca whales that transform into bears when they arrive on land. Part Spirit Bear, a rare white bear unique to BC, Miga’s outgoing spirit and high energy draw her to action and adventure.

      Quatchi, a shy and gentle giant, is a sasquatch – a popular figure in local Aboriginal legends of the Pacific West Coast. Quatchi reminds us of the mystery and wonder associated with the great Canadian wilderness. Although Quatchi loves all winter sports, he’s especially fond of hockey and dreams of becoming a world-famous goalie.

      Sumi is an animal spirit who wears the hat of the orca whale, flies with the wings of the mighty thunderbird and runs on the furry legs of the black bear. With a name that is derived from the Salish word ‘sumesh,’ meaning guardian spirit,’ Sumi is passionate about the environment and is a fan of all Paralympic sports.

      Please note that BC’ers are famous for their pot smoking. :LOL:

  14. drive-by commenter says:

    Someone please ask that woman to confirm that she refuses to accept Social Security and Medicare payments from the evil socialist government.

  15. memememe says:

    Why do I have the feeling this group was created on a crazy bet, kind of like Scientology? Probably because in both cases, I’m amazed anyone falls for such drivel, and it’s always good for a laugh.

  16. mamegoma says:

    ok so im sure im about to get made fun of hardcore but im willing to take it in the hopes that someone could please explain this picture/caption to me???

    • Default User says:

      Tea bagging is a sexual term referring to placing a mans ‘teabags’(if you can’t figure out what a mans tea bags are, I’ll give you one hint, it’s something women don’t have) into someones mouth, or on their face. The tea bag protesters (from the Boston tea party protests of the American Revolution) adopted/were given the name teabaggers unaware of the slang meaning it carried. This woman is obviously unaware of the sexual implications of her sign.

  17. VanHorne says:

    Teabagging is the derogatory term given by the liberal Left to describe the Tea Party Movement supporters. If you know your early American history, you understand the implications of the “Tea Parties” and what they’re representing. The Lefties knew what they were doing when they introduced such a foul slang term in everyday descriptions of the protesters. And once again, it’s interesting to see how when their side is protesting something, they’re called “patriots” by the government-run mass media. Yet when people stand up to protest their freedoms and property being stripped away by an overbearing government full of Left-wing moonbats, they’re considered “tea-baggers”. Democrats, once again showing the world that their own critical standards for everyone still don’t apply when it’s them.

    As for the whole Cpt America thing… if I was Captain America, I’d have retired to a secluded island by now and given the finger to the people of this country. The people don’t deserve a hero when they aren’t willing to stand on their own two feet and do something to defend themselves first.

    • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

      I find it ironic that you protest over taxes claiming it erodes individual rights while standing silently as liberal and conservative ‘representatives’ alike quietly hand over a right so fundamental it wasn’t even considered in your constitution, the right to free thought, under the guise of ever more bloated and imbalanced “Intellectual Property” laws in secret, back room, agreements and with barely a whisper in the main stream media.

    • R-A-N-D-O says:

      You know what, pal? Fvck you. If there comes a time when the US military needs ME to fight for it, then our country is completely fvcked. I am SO not military material. There are people who are willing to defend this country (or fight in whatever pet project our government is into, Bush AND Obama, I’m talking to you). That’s great. I’m short, fat, have major hearing loss in my left ear, and blind as a bat. YOU DON’T WANT ME FIGHTING FOR YOU. So fvck you and your “do something to defend themselves.”

      You right wingnut conservatrolls who have it in for all liberals are pathetic excuses for Americans. Yeah, the entire country has it out for the poor widdle conservatives. Nobody loves you. The ebil liberals are out to eat the babies of the noble, saintly conservatives who want what’s best for everyone. Do me a favor and die in a fire.

      I get so sick of seeing that attitude on here. It makes me want to stay away from here.

    • Danbala says:

      “the government-run mass media”?

      I thought you were the land of the free and all that jazz? And I thought it was the “libtard mass media”? is it only when the government happens to be considered libtard that it suits to call it “government-run”?

    • Danbala says:

      “The people don’t deserve a hero when they aren’t willing to stand on their own two feet and do something to defend themselves first.”

      Maybe “the people” have different views on what is important to defend, and what is the best way to defend it, than you do?

  18. iNAKO says:

    someone should say that in halo

  19. Fat Betty says:

    So, she is ignorant because she isn’t aware of the slang, nasty, made-up definition of “teabagging”?

  20. Rando is annoyed with the voting says:

    I’m gonna need one of them thar screen protectors now.

  21. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    I don’t know if I would actually consider this a stereotype in these places as such or just wishful thinking.

  22. wicket's ebil twin says:

    I heard that Asian girl’s buttcr@cks go sideways like their eyes do. Is that a stereotype or wishful thinking?

  23. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    Don’t we all dream of a magical place of endless alcohol, loose morals and easy women… I don’t know about you but that’s why I come on the Internet.

  24. JMixx says:

    It depends. Are they standing up, or lying down?

  25. wicket's ebil twin says:

    so a stereotype then? i only mentioned the vertical or horizontal axis of Asian girls butt cracks. Regardless, i’d like to know more about this strange dreamland you speak of…is it in Texas?

  26. WorldsTallestMidget says:

    I’ve tried to come on the Internet. It never gets past my computer screen. *SPLAT!*

  27. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    I suppose you’re right wicket, it is indeed a stereotype, albeit one not perpetrated out of hate, just juvenile hedonism. As for the dream land, I haven’t tried looking in Texas yet, but I have some promising leads in back woods British Columbia.

  28. wicket's ebil twin says:

    Juvenile? How dare you!

  29. Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

    Who said there’s anything wrong with being juvenile, I highly recommend it on a regular basis.

    and on a side note thbbppppp

  30. Captain Wow WILL go Avada Kedavra on your ass says:

    I agree.
    *walks off behind a building and barfs*

  31. R-A-N-D-O says:

    Is that why girls call his name out so much when it’s happening?

  32. oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

    Yes.

  33. WorldsTallestMidget says:

    That joke is so old it has Alzheimer’s.

  34. charro says:

    Rando isn’t old! He wouldn’t know that! Sheesh.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up