Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


TAKE IT OFF SEXAH!



barack obama

TAKE IT OFF SEXAH!
Grandma always knew how to make things awkward

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Grimmiekins via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 227 comments

  1. milenkokonut says:

    first! :)

    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

      Public speaking is the process of speaking to a group of people in a structured, deliberate manner intended to inform, influence, or entertain the listeners.

      In public speaking, as in any form of communication, there are five basic elements, often expressed as “who is saying what to whom using what medium with what effects?” The purpose of public speaking can range from simply transmitting information, to motivating people to act, to simply telling a story. Good orators should be able to change the emotions of their listeners, not just inform them. Public speaking can also be considered a discourse community. Interpersonal communication and public speaking have several components that embrace such things as motivational speaking, leadership/personal development, business, customer service, large group communication, and mass communication. Public speaking can be a powerful tool to use for purposes such as motivation, influence, persuasion, informing, translation, or simply entertaining.

  2. milenkokonut says:

    and, yeah, Obama IS Sexah! grrrr… :o D

    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

      No he isn’t he has dumbo ears.

      • mothergoose says:

        Some women call them “handlebars” when their man has decided to give oral…ummm…nevermind… carry on… nothing to see here!!

      • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

        We girls call those handles. :lol:

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          Yeah but are they sexy? Come on now……. A girl in a school girl outfit with Pig tails = sexy.. a doofey looking guy who grabs air with his ears =/= sexy…

          • mabsba says:

            Okay, I finally have to ask: how is it that you are finding any guys sexy? I thought you were straight. As a straight woman, I don’t find women sexy no matter how good looking.

          • mothergoose says:

            Sexy is more than just looks, ILPB… it’s attitude, presence, aura, karma… AND HE GOT IT!!!!

          • creaturefeature the cookie baker says:

            You’d be surprised what women find sexy in a man, ILPB . . . . . !!

            • I Like Peanut Butter says:

              No I wouldn’t… I’ve studied your kind ofr 30 some years now….. and there a variences, depending on the woman.
              1) Some woman are attracted to power
              2) Some woman attracted to money
              3) Big Biceps
              4) Six pack abs
              5) Sense of humor
              6) Great with kids
              7) Great with Animals
              8) Romance novel cover
              9) THAT guy….
              10) Bad Boys

              Sometimes it’s a combination of all…. however never once has a girl come up to me and said “DAMN you sticking out ears are sexy”.

              • creaturefeature the cookie baker says:

                errrm – you missed one thing out . . .

              • Wino the god of all things inebriation and warrior-god says:

                How about Harvard law degree, President, caring father…. and happens to have ears that “stick out”?

              • mabsba says:

                Sorry, you still lose. I have BEEN a woman for a lot longer than that and can tell you that what a particular woman will find attractive is NOT predictable (except perhaps to that woman and her man — he obviously has figured it out :) ). I suspect you are about as accurate as those homophobic straights who think they can tell who’s gay by looking at them.

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  Alright what’s missing from my list? Remember I did say combination. Oh and it’s actually quite easy to tell, if he’s kissing another guy on the lips he’s gay, if he went to Britney Spears concert for the dancing and music, he’s gay, if hehe’s holding a sign up to gay protesters that makes a sighn say “Gay Sex is Great” he’s gay……

                  • mabsba says:

                    Sorry, I’ve never met a straight person who had very good gaydar — and your list of stereotypes just proved why.

                    Your list fails in so many ways it would take too long to describe. Basically, it’s as superficial as your list of how to tell people are gay.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      You still haven’t mentioned what’s missing from my list. I said attitude, sense of humor, good with kids, not everything on that list is negative and to treat as such is being a little touchy there Mabs. So wait, good attitude is superficial GOT IT!!!

                      • I think making a list of this sort is pretty much exactly what the word superficial means by definition.

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          superficial: concerned with or comprehending only what is on the surface or obvious
                          I got lazy and stopped saying “some” it was intended for all, if I say some, not being stereoyping nor superficial, and hte fact I mentioned it could be a combination of all of these, oh and the fact I brought in non-superficial things like being good with kids, animals, good attitude, funny, etc….. I would have to disagree. Superficial would be if I had just done money, power, and looks.

                        • Not the content of your list, but the list itself. Trying to say what women are attracted to without taking into account a woman’s age, interests, goals, and a variety of other factors, seems to be only a list of the obvious and leaves out the real details involved with what makes a woman attracted to somebody else. I’m not calling you superficial, but your list is just a broad overview lacking in real substance and only touching the surface, hence i think it’s superficial by definition.

                      • Rattus says:

                        I think kindness in general is sexy. In fact, the very first boy I fell in love with was the only one who didn’t laugh at me when I fell off of my bike.

                        I think stability and sanity is sexy.

                        I think taking a heavy bag from my hand and carrying it without asking if I need help is sexy (assuming I actually know you – it’s kind of frightening if you’re a stranger).

                        I think the ability to admit to being wrong is sexy.

                        I think that appreciating that a great date doesn’t have to cost a penny is sexy.

                        I think that hugging me without it turning into sex is sexy.

                        I think all these things are way sexier than money or power.

                  • creaturefeature the cookie baker says:

                    *grabs ILPB by the ears*

                    *whispers the following: &%£*M&!??@~^*

                    got that ???

              • viking gal says:

                Let me see. 5 was important (humor), and 7 (animals). But I also value smart, kind, and comfortable with who he is.
                I wouldn’t want to deal with the ego that comes from super-gorgeous (if he isn’t gay).
                ‘Perfect’ muscles at my age range would require WAY too much time in the gym, so no thank you!
                Yes, there are certain bits of ‘unattractive’ that I would find lust-killers. But not necessarily the same aspects that would be deal-breakers for other women.

          • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

            ILPB, it is so obvious you are not a girl :D . Deep down, we are really not overly about looks. Witness the hot girls with the dorky guys.

            • I Like Peanut Butter says:

              I call BS on that, unless the man has something else to compensate. People will not go on dates or talk to individuals in a “romantic way” unless there is an initial mutual attraction.

              • mabsba says:

                You are so full of it, it’s coming through your fingers. My bil is as dorky as they come, including having Cerebral Palsy, and they have been together for 25+ years. And sis was a cutie college girl when they met.

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  So you mean to tell me that a guy you find physically unattractive would get a chance at a “date” with you if he approached you?

                  • Danbala says:

                    I think the thing is that the physical attractiveness seems to vary wildly.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      I agree whole heartidly, but that has to get you in the door, then the rest can go.

                      • Danbala says:

                        Depends on a lot though – whether you’re meeting in a “blind date”-situation or it’s emotions that grow out of another form of relationship.

                        The physical traits you listed are turnoffs for me, btw. :)

                      • mabsba says:

                        No, it doesn’t. You can be attracted to a person for something that has nothing to do with their physical appearance.

                        • semperfidd says:

                          I have to agree with mabs on this point ILPB. What about internet romances where you fall in love with the person before you even meet?

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          And how many of those romances actually work out if the people meet in person and one is the exact opposite of what the other finds attractive (physically)? There are exceptions to everything however majority of life’s romances start with a stirring in the loins on looks, however that stirring can be completely stopped if the person is not the “whole” package.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          It’s certainly true that if you have two people with the same basic appearance one can be attractive and one repellent due to personality. On the other hand, I’ll readily admit I’m more likely to find somebody attractive if they look like Clive Owen than if they look like Joseph Merrick. Yes, it’s superficial, but I’ll admit it.

                        • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                          @diss: there definitely has to be a physical attraction there, but it’s so variable as to who finds what attractive.

                        • mabsba says:

                          I wanted the t-shirt my husband was wearing the first time I saw him. Didn’t actually notice him. He still has it.

                        • Default User says:

                          Mabs likes include long walks on the beach, romantic dinners and t-shirts.

                        • Just out of curiosity Mabs, what was on that T-shirt?

                  • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                    Yes. But not all women are like that. Just like not all men are attracted to the sticks (as I call them) or the curvey women like me. However, men tend to be more visual in picking their partners, generally; women are usually not that visual (with exceptions to every rule).

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      There were some online studies as well as other ones (can’t get the links at work b/c it’s “dating stuff”) that shows women are just as willing to not consort with someone they don’t find attractive as men.

                      Bottom line there are people who live for looks, those that live for attitudae, some in-between, however looks will always get oyu in the door (just everyone’s perception of looks is different)….

                      PS I love me my curvy women. :-)

                      • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                        studies in general have shown that you will date people you consider the same level of attractiveness as you are. but they have done follow-ups that have shown that a fugly guy with a stupendous personality will get more dates than the brad pitt (thelma and louise hottness) with an IQ of 7.

                        yes, you generally date within your attractiveness… but there are other things associated with attraction. and they’re definitely more important than attractiveness.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Well, at least more SECOND dates! :-) Agreed, though. And adding that once you get hit by the personality and start falling for the person, physical appearance becomes of even less importance. Hence the fact that we can look at you guys lying there in the morning snoring with your mouths open and not feel repelled.

                      • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                        I think that’s what we were all trying to tell you was that it’s so varied that you simply can’t make a “list”. :D

                        PS Isn’t that funny, I love my curves ;)

              • ugly bloke says:

                I am short, fat, bald, stupid, poor, smelly, ugly and toothless, and have no problem getting dates.
                *licks own eyebrows*

            • If girls were overly into looks, I’d still be a virgin, so I think Nucky is right.

  3. Cuddlee says:

    His kung fu is strong.

  4. dissimilitude says:

    Funny, and congrats to Grimmiekins, but…..please don’t. Please.

  5. woohoo says:

    awesome picture, thank god that will never happen!

  6. pittypat says:

    OK, *now* will BK puhleeez grace us with his charming presence? ;)

    • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

      BT is, I believe, currently unable to join us. I’m sure he will as soon as he can. We all miss him :D

      • mabsba says:

        Hey, Canuck! Ice dancing for the win!!!

        • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

          I know!! I was crying by the end of their dance. Sappy, ain’t I? :D

          • mothergoose says:

            Not that I would rub it in about the hockey game the other night but… ouch Dammit!! I just burned my lip on a steaming cup of USA VICTORY!!!!

            • I Like Peanut Butter says:

              MG a few days too late…. but yeah it REALLY must be embarrassing to lose on home ice to someone who hasn’t beaten you in like 40 or 50 years… OUCH!! ;-)

              • Churj says:

                Hey, we didn’t lose to the American team, we lost to Miller.
                That man deserves a good medal regardless of how the rest of the team does for the tournament.

                • Churj says:

                  **gold medal. :D

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    Good medal works as well. You can blame your defense for constantly turning the puck over in your zone as well.

                    • Churj says:

                      Brodeur failed miserably at saves, but for most the game team Canada did control the puck (and dominated with shots on net etc). The Americans won way too many face offs, but the real victory was Miller making so many crazy saves… especially in that last minute of play.

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        What was that, like 15 shots in the last 2:00 minutes. That empty net goal by the USA must killed you.

                      • Canada also lacked discipline, taking a lot of stupid penalties. But yeah, Miller won that game. I think he stopped about 45,300 shots. Brodeur allowed 4 goals on 2 shots, which I’m not even sure is possible.

                        • Churj says:

                          Haha that game was all about the goaltending. At the end of 2nd/beginning of 3rd, the Canadians did take a few too many penalties… of course, the Americans third goal was also the result of a goaltender interference that wasn’t called. Just sayin’!
                          I stick by my guns though, Canada was in control of the game for most of the game, but Miller just kept denying them every opportunity they had.

            • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

              It was a rough weekend for the Canucks. But I’m still proud of every one of them. :)

              • mabsba says:

                Well, you know I don’t follow hockey, although you’ll be proud of me for actually understanding when they talked about how well the American goalie did, so we can just bask in the other medals, ours and yours. :-)

                • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                  Five golds, four silver and a bronze. I don’t care what anyone says, I am super proud of all of our athletes, the 4th, 5th, 6th, etc. finishers as well!
                  :D

                  • mabsba says:

                    FTW, I have to go with the woman who took a 150 foot (50 m) airborne tumble on the downhill and actually skiied the next day. :shock: Totally impressed.

                  • Danbala says:

                    Hmpf. We only have 3-2-2. (Yeah, I had to look that up. :p )

                  • Canada has done very well, and has surprised people in at least a few events. But if they don’t pull their heads out of their asses in hockey, it’ll be a dark, dark day in Vancouver.

                    • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                      We can do it, Rando. I have faith
                      *sits in the corner, rocking back and forth muttering at least we have the women*

                      • Yeah, what was their most recent score, I haven’t paid attention. Have they scored over 50 in a game yet?

                        • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                          It’s been close :lol:

                          Hey, did any of you see Tom Brokaw’s thing on Canada? Someone e-mailed it to me. It was awesome!!

                          What was even more awesome was the guy at the end talking to Tom saying that California has more people than Canada and Tom saying, yeah, but they have a better economy. HEEHEE.

                        • Default User says:

                          Our economy is just fine! Um…can someone lend me some money for duct tape, I need to fix something….*stands in front of large gaping hole in the economy so no one will know it’s there*

                        • The Colbert Report from Canada was pretty funny. They LOVE him there, huge outdoor set looked like a couple thousand were there to watch the taping. Colbert did one of his “The Fighting” your-district-number-here segments but changed it to “The Fighting” your-riding-number-here. As always Colbert’s interviews with law-makers, Canadian or American, is full of prejudice and close-minded arrogance (priceless)!

        • eddiepscetti says:

          Well you should hear all the brouhaha going on down this way over that Russian pair and their ‘Aboriginal’ routine. The Aborigines are thoroughly pissed and say that the routine doesn’t even come close. After watching it, I just wanted to smack the both of them just on general purposes.

          • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

            ignoring the racist side of the routine… it was horrifically boring. ice dance on its own is boring (no lifts and jumps) but the routine was just awful. there was a pair from the UK (don’t remember which country) that did a hoe-down type ice dance routine and it was so much more fun to watch.

            one other thing i noticed about the russian team. the chick had a half inch of dark brown roots showing in her “blonde” hair. don’t you think you’d do your roots before going on international tv?!

            • mabsba says:

              I agree. I’m not that big a fan of ice dancing. However, I could NOT believe that those Russians didn’t think anyone would be upset with them. How could someone travel internationally for what they do for a living and not have some clue?

              • Nucky the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                Apparently, they received complaints in Aussieland (I’m just going to rename every country, kay?) and this time held meetings with the local natives, exchanged gifts, etc. (They were wearing native blankets when they received their scores for compulsories (sp?), as a “good will gesture). Why they thought that would make it “okay” I don’t know.

                Oh, and Mabs, I’ve been a huge fan of ice dancing ever since I watched Torville and Dean dance to Bolero…….sigh

                • mabsba says:

                  “Well, we’re just going to continue with our stereotypical interpretation of your culture, but, look, presents?” I hope the presents weren’t trading beads, at least.

                  Ice dancing is okay, just not top of my list for winter Olympics. Not very popular in the States right now as NBC aired that instead of the Canadian-USA hockey game. I don’t even watch hockey, but WTF?

                • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                  the torville and dean routine was probably the only ice dancing routine that i like. but it makes me sad the way that they butchered bolero. a FAST rendition should be about 13 minutes long… and it was like 3minutes tops. :(

  7. pittypat says:

    um, that would be BT (BK is my secret, secret nickname).

  8. gringo says:

    Wonder where his teleprompters are hidden? Lord knows he can’t string 3 words together without it.

    • paws4thot says:

      First pointless conservatroll of the day. You’re not only an embarrassment to yourself, but even to those conservatives who have 2 neurons each to keep themselves company!

      • mothergoose says:

        Kinda like the speaker I saw a highlight of the other day… (can’t remember who it was, but I think it was at CPAC)…makes a wisecrack about Obama reading from a teleprompter whilst making a speech, using a teleprompter… priceless…

        • Churj says:

          But come on guyz!!1!111!!! Nobody evr uses a teleprompter but obamaman does cuz he suxors and stuffs. Come on!11!elebenty!!

          • I Like Peanut Butter says:

            Well as long as you can admit it, we should get along fine…. giggity giggity

            • Ivan, Superstar! says:

              Yeah. Here’s a LOL for you.

              {http://cheezburger.com/View.aspx?aid=3219186176}

              • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                Double link posting on same board, that’s a party foul Ivan.. now go to a keg stand, but not with the Sam Adams, you get the BEAST Keg….

                And I will not be baited into a teleprompter war…… they all use one, just some more than others. (And yes Bush should have stuck to his more often than not).

                • dissimilitude says:

                  Not the PBR! ;-)

                • Ivan, Superstar! says:

                  Eat me, how’s that for a foul?

                  And suddenly you’re all morally superior “I will not be baited into a teleprompter war” when you’ve been liberally (hehe) throwing the teleprompter slur at us for weeks. Now it’s a pic of one of your heroes using a teleprompter, you don’t want to discuss it. *smacks PB with a rolled up newspaper* BAD TROLL.

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    Ivan: When was the last time I brought up the teleprompter? And if you look at the rest of my answer I made fun of Bush….. so who’s being the trolly troll now….. seriously dude you go from 0 to A$$hole in 2.2 seconds… you need to chill.

                    • Ivan, Superstar! says:

                      From this page alone: Look at your response to Churj, and right below here you said “BUT was the telepormpter [sic] on… NOW that’s the question…… ;-)

                      You’re just unhappy that you’ve been called out. ;)

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        Wow Ivan you need to learn sarcasm… besides this last two SARCASTIC posts, when was th elast ime I got on Obama’s a$$ about Teleprompters?

            • Churj says:

              Haha yup. I’ll actually admit I don’t like Obama! I do like both libertrolls and conservatrolls though, because then we get to mock people… and regardless of political affiliation, all of PK can come together in that mockery :D .
              Hyperbole = laughs for all

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          BUT was the telepormpter on… NOW that’s the question…… ;-)

  9. Mewt says:

    Didnt Obama’s gran die a while back?

  10. clueless says:

    Ya gotta love granny. I’ve known (read had) more than one granny who knew how to make things awkward. Perhaps it is my goal to be outrageous when I a old.

  11. Justacarolinian says:

    Finally, a funny Obama LOL. Not a gut buster, but funny. WTG BT.

  12. DRH says:

    It’s mean to make fun of Obama’s granny.

  13. LOL, okay that actually made me laugh. Yay!

  14. Jenna says:

    I find Obama FAR from sexy.

  15. oɹɹɐɥɔ says:

    I uh. Ew.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up