Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

 

« Previous | Next »


We know this field


corn sarah palin

We know this field is well fertilized

(Corn Sarah Palin)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: fastfood via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 245 comments

  1. semperfidd says:

    WOW!!!! A Sarah Palin lol…How unusual

    • Ceefax says:

      Sarah Palin is a Sarah Palin lol.

    • I know right? Where are those super funny ones that talk about how Obama is pure evil and is destroying the country? Those are hilarious.



      NOT.

      • Grantski says:

        Rando, can you honestly say we’re better off now than before Obama came into office? He wont even stop this healthcare bill when most of the country says they dont want it. Not to mention the spending trillions of dollars that aren’t there.

        • What did he spend trillions on? If you mean the department of defense, social security, and medicare; that might be a debate worth having. If you mean a stimulus package; that could also possibly be worth arguing for or against. Other than those 4 listed things, im not real sure what you’re referring to. Only one side of the propaganda machine is claiming the “America” doesn’t want health care. I guess depends on who you ask and how you ask it. The last poll i saw that mentioned health insurance reforms was overwhelmingly popular.

          • The thing is, I want my health care reform to actually have some reform in it. I have some concerns about the current bill. The conservatives think it does too much, but I think it does way too little.

            • Ivan, Superstar! says:

              ^^^This.

            • Your right in your concern, but your concern shows up on a general poll in the “hates Obamacare” column. My point was that the polls are easily, and most of all purposefully, a misrepresentation of what “America” wants.

              I assume it’s the mandate that you dislike, it’s the one thing i don’t like either. But after hearing strong arguments for it, i see it as the only way to get healthy people “in the pool”. It’s really easy to hate it, but it’s the same concept as social security. The younger healthier citizen’s taxes pay for the older sicker citizen’s needs. Tough argument to swallow, but i have to say it makes a decent one.

              • I do predict that things like smoking and obesity being a major concern for our country’s future if the mandate goes into law. Healthier lifestyle’s all across the country being a nice side effect, and yet you still have the choice to be as unhealthy as you want (your insurance is cheap and guaranteed). It could be great, and it could be a great failure. There are always two sides to everything. Action-Reaction. History shows, it’s usually the younger generation that grasp these Nationalist movements a lot easier than the older generations do.

              • Charlie Oscar Delta says:

                You can make up statistics to prove anything, forfty percent of people know that!

                courtesy of the great fountain of wisdom that is known as Homer Jay Simpson

            • It needs to go into the books, regardless of what’s in it. Pardon the language, but it’s a SH!TLOAD easier to pass an amendment than it is to pass a bill. Put a law in the books, and we have future generations of politicians to amend it into perfection. 60 years from now, the bill could look nothing like it does when it passes this year. If you believe health care to be an American right…then you should be for this bill. No other President in United State’s history has come this close, and every Democrat in the White House has tried. I’m willing to see Republicans take over the Congress, the Senate, and/or the White House for a term or two just so we can see a health care bill passed. It’s worth it to me.

              • semperfidd says:

                Yeah. That worked so well for social security, medicare, medicaid. You are wrong Wickets and foolish if you believe that either party in congress will make this work. I know it gets old hearing this but please name something that the government runs that is not full of wasteful spending and inferior service. I agree with diss below, we need reform but we need to do it by targeting specific issues and not create a whole new cluster F.

                • Default User says:

                  The post office?

                  • MonaLisa (inCT) says:

                    You can’t even get one of your kids to go to the corner store for 44 cents.

                    • paws4thot says:

                      Not even if you give them 44c for getting a bag of potatoes, 44c for an lb of deli ham… for 30 or 40 items?

                      • Default User says:

                        Maybe…maybe if you give them 99c for a bag of potato chips, for them…you know, if there’s nothing good on TV and their friends are busy.

                        • paws4thot says:

                          All I was doing was partially correcting the common mail carrier analogy (a full correction would pay them more for heavy and/or bulk items).

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  To build off this point some. My Grandma is 95 years old, and sick. Meidcare doesn’t want to pay for anything. They turned her down for surgery to remove cancerous tumors, b/c “The risk is too large to warrant such surgery”, in other words “You could die in surgery and we’ll be out thousands of dollars, so we’ll jsut let you die a nice slow painful cancerous death.” Yeah and Health Care run by the government wouldn’t enact “Death Panels”….. Sorry Rando, Wicket, Ivan, and other’s but your precious government is just as bad as insurance companies.

                  • paws4thot says:

                    I can see your point but the risk of surgery is what it is. Who pays the resultant bill doesn’t change the risk of carrying out a specific procedure in a particular way.

                    This is a highly personal question, and I implore everyone to take “I don’t want to discuss this” as an answer, but have you had the conversation about living wills and DNR directives with your immediate family? This is what your so-called “death panels” are actually about.

                    I’m down with saying that my answer is that we have had that conversation, and are all fine with giving DNR and “No Heroic Measures” directions to medical staff when the circumstances warrant.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      paws: I’m not saying the DR or my Grandma was against the Surgery, SHE WANTED IT!!! Medicare said no to her. The “Death Panels” have nothing to do with DNR or living wills, it has to do with people’s WANT for treatment and said treatment is turned down. You know the same thing insurance companies do that the government wants them to stop doing. (funny how they can do the EXACT opposite they ask of companies, and the government’s supposed to be non-profit)

                      • paws4thot says:

                        You’ve missed my point; I was saying that any reputable surgeon or anaestheiologist (sp)should refuse to operate if they consider the risks of the operation to be too high, regardless of the potential benefits of the op. Ok?

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          I disagree. I think that they should let the patient know the risks involved, and let the patient decide. I don’t want anyone else deciding my fate but me really. I also believe in aboslving the DRs of most of the risk when they perfrom the surgery with risk involved. IE person dies not instant wrongful death suit, unless the Doc made a blatant mistake and/or was drunk, etc…

                        • Default User says:

                          Personally, if my choices were surgery that may kill me, or may save my life vs guaranteed long painful death I would go with the surgery option. Yeah, it could result in my death, but if if I didn’t get the surgery I would die anyways. It seems the question boils down to possible death vs certain death. Shouldn’t doctors choose possible death over that?

                        • JTDrift says:

                          I hate to sound shallow or even down right offensive, but in this case…. she’s 95yrs old. I would imagine that the Docs would factor that in with their decision to not operate on her. depending on the location and size of the cancer, the recovery time can be on average long and longer. She would have to be on some heavy meds afterward just to heal the wounds the surgery caused! Also, it is the right of the patient to know all the risks involved with their well being to make an educated decision in regards to her heath. It is the right for the patient to not be denied by ANYONE, access to life saving operations. But… she’s 95yrs old. wouldn’t the surgeon and their team be more useful doing the same surgery on someone younger? like say a child?

                        • I Like Peanut Butter the Anti-Correction says:

                          JTDrift: It’s not the DRs it’s Medicare refusing to pay. You know that same people that want to run our Health Care System. You know the whole “Death Panel” fears, they get somewhat substantiated here now don’t they.

            • dissimilitude says:

              The thing that most bothers me about the health care bill is this: In my opinion, a single law (which of course has to start with a bill) should address a single discrete issue or problem. In this situation, there are several issues that are only tangentially related and our brilliant government has decided that Every Single Issue must be addressed in ONE bill. Logically, they need to step back, identify what the specific issues ARE, prioritize them in some fashion, and then work on drafting legislation to address EACH issue. For example, a clearly worded bill addressing the pre-existing conditions issue (and perhaps a few other ways our insurance companies screw us over for increased profits) could easily have passed by now with bipartisan support. It’s like the old adage, “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time”…but they’re determined to figure out how to get the elephant in one bite and don’t understand why there’s choking going on.

              What we’re going to end up with is a massive clusterflurk that nobody understands, which doesn’t actually solve most of the problems it needed to address, which adds more levels of confusing bureaucracy, and which will probably include a heaping side of pork to get it passed.

              • froofrou says:

                *standing ovation* Nicely put, Diss!

              • I totally understand, but at this point in the game…if you want health care reform and you don’t want to wait 2 more decades for it to happen, I’d start thinking about being happy with what we have instead of opposing it. There is no such thing as perfect and you can never please everybody. It’s obvious this whole debate has grown tiresome and turned a massive amount of people that used to be “for health care refore” now against it, but in the long run they just need to pass the ugly ass bill and move on. If confusing bureaucracy and the ALWAYS persistent pork is the only thing you oppose, i’d very respectfully ask you to rethink your priorities. It’s about sick people getting health care, not about politically pleasing the center or the left or both at the same time.

                • My concern with breaking it down like diss is suggesting is that it would take forever to get everything passed, and essential elements might be turned down by Republicans which would put a big hole in the plan. I don’t like the current plan, but I don’t like making 200 mini-bills either.

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    If you try and do too much too quick you will get the reaction you are getting now. When the center is out protesting, something is wrong Rando. The myth is that the Tea PArties are all conservative nut jobs, when in actuality there are many may moderates out there. As said before when the center is protesting a politician has fvcked up.

                    • who cares anymore, i’d happily concede the house of representatives and the white house to republicans for two terms(two terms is how long it takes America to realize that Republicans could care less what they want). This notion of not passing a bill because we’re scared of not getting re-elected is the same BS that i hate Repubs for. If you know it’s right, and you know it’s going to help Americans, then pass it and get voted out and feel good for doing the right thing.

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        In it’s current form it really won’t help Americans, it’ll raise taxes, add to the debt, and hurt the economy. If you watch the stock market, everytime the Health Care looks close to passing it crashes almost 100- 200 points. It’s cutting off your nose to spite our face.

                        • your point just makes mine more valid. pass the bill, then give the torch to whoever Rush Limbaugh wants. We both end up happy, and my cousin will be able to afford hip surgery, and your neighbor can go get the cyst checkup she’s been avoiding, and the elder obese teacher can finally get some affordable medication to keep teaching. I’m to the point that i don’t care anymore, I just want to see the bill passed…even if it means years of Republican control of any of the three branches of elected government. Republicans will never hold the office or the house for more than two years…trust me, i’m very aware of their policies.

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          With a fragile economy, anything else that’ll hurt it more right now, just doesn’t seem the right plan. Also if it’s SO horrible and against public favor, I’m pretty sure it could get repealed. Do it right, do it slow, rash action does nothing for this country except piss people off, and frankly I don’t want my taxes to go up another 5-8% (which they will) in the next few years, I can’t afford it.

                  • Here is the perfect example; Rando thinks the bill does too little, while Diss thinks it does too much too fast. Both are very valid points and although they seem contradictory, both appear to be on the same side of the debate. Republicans (the other side of the debate) have a very easy answer to our silly discrepancies; that is just don’t pass anything! If anyone thinks that Democrats will still hold this political trifecta (House, Senate, and White House) after November then they are delusional. My point is, just pass the damn thing and end the debate. Republicans will not vote for it this year, next year, or the year after that. We have one opportunity that every Democratic administration for the last 50 years has tried, and it shouldn’t be wasted. The in-party arguments are a benefit of having logical disagreements, Republicans normally don’t have this in-party disagreement problem, as they just kick a person out of the party if you don’t vote along with the party lines. And their party line says, NO TO ANY REAL HEALTH REFORM. I’m pleading the Senate to just pass it, I don’t care if it’s not exactly what i want anymore. It’s like i’d rather half a half-eaten half-melt chocolate bar with peanuts (i hate peanuts!), than nothing at all.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      But the half eaten, half melted candy bar could make you sick, putting you in a worse situation. Why pass something that will make EVERYTHING worse. Also is the Dems just hurry up and pass the Health Care Bill you will see in November there is a REAL risk of the Dems not only losing the super majority, but the majority. If you think nothing is getting one now, imagine Obama against both the House and Senate on ANYTHING!
                      Actually if the Dems would stop coddling the BIG Civil Lawyers (who tend to support the Dems) and actually stop the frivulous mal-practice cases, they would probably get more support. Instead of just setting up costing the public more money. Health Care costs are out of control for many many reasons, and THAT needs to be looked at.

                      • Your argument is stale and not worth reacting to. It literally hurts my pride to say, i don’t care. I’ll sit through a Mit Romney or even a (one term) Sarah Palin Presidency…politicians shouldn’t vote on whether or not they’re gonna have a job in November. Vote what they think is right, vote regardless of what the dimwit opposition says. Be bold, be gracious, and know in your own moral bowels, that your vote is what the country needs…not what the next poll says. It’s getting disgusting. ILPB, you seem nice and somewhat reasonable, but politics is getting F’n upsetting. Republicans have filibustered 80% of the bills in the Senate….and then they pander to the public because Americans think “our government doesn’t work”. It’s f’n disgusting and i don’t think i can continue this conversation with you without throwing out insults.

                        • Default User says:

                          Ugh, I hate to side with PB here ;) , but they are voted in to do our bidding, if you don’t do what the people want you get voted out. It’s a goverment of the people, by the people and for the people. That means the people have a say in what happens and if what happens isn’t what they want they vote in new people to fix it(in theory). Of course the problem now is it seems we only manage to vote in people interested in doing what is right for their wallet, or fighting against the other party for the sake of opposition without any real reason for it….

                        • DU, you precious soul, i’m aware why people are elected and what they are suppose to do when they are elected. The problem resides in that the people elect their representatives for whatever positions term limits are. We elect our Senators for two year terms for example. He/She is elected to use their best judgement, not some pundit or poll’s judgement, but their own judgement. It’s the power they are given by being elected. In other words, once they are in office THEY ARE WHAT AMERICA WANTS at least in their particular states. If you can remember the Bill Clinton health care reform attempt, you should see strikingly similar characteristics. Once the debate lasts long enough for opposition to spew radio pundit garble, opposing TV ads, and blatant lies…the debate ends up on the side of evil instead of good. Call that what America wants if you prefer, but i call it very effective propaganda. I want my representatives to vote with what they want…not what the latest Rasmussen poll says they should want.

                        • Er, we elect House reps for 2 years. We elect senators for 6 years. Just saying.

                        • a55hole, just saying. i’m being way to emotional on this subject than usual. i want to go back to making farming puns…i’m going to get a drink. I got pretty worked up, and just expressing myself here, not really focusing on anybody here on PK. This just seems an appropriate place for me to vent. I’ll come back in an hour (after the bar) and I’ll either be back to the funnies or i’ll beligerantly start attacking anyone in sight. thanks for pudding up with me.

                        • or i’ll be getting laid…. *fingers crossed* could explain my pent up rage….

                        • Default User says:

                          O.o

                        • back from the bar!!!! i could care less abpit plitics. ilove you guuysss

                    • “I’m pleading the Senate to just pass it, I don’t care if it’s not exactly what i want anymore.”

                      That’s very dangerous thinking there, wicket. And it would backfire, horribly. It wouldn’t get the toe in the door for future improvements. The Democrats would pat themselves on the back for passing the bill, and then our government would say “we did, it’s over with” and forget about it. They’d declare victory even though it wouldn’t actually be what we want. And then both sides of the debate would be stuck trying to make a toothless, useless bill work.
                      At this point, I hope I’m wrong. I hope that it will somehow be good for America and that all of us who are skeptical on both sides are wrong. Because you’re right when you say it’s our only chance at reform. But I have this bad feeling that they blew it.

                      • The debate is over Rando. I’m not happy with it, just like the right isn’t happy with it, just like the middle isn’t happy with it, just like the left isn’t happy with it. But by all means, the debate is over. They tried to please everybody and ended up with a jumblefurk of a bill. At this point it either passes by majority or it doesn’t. And whatever repercussions the Democratic party pays, is it’s own fault, but it’ll pay those seats for a reason…because they tried to help the helpless, they tried to help the sick get healthy. It’s a minimal price to pay for doing what is right…even if it is the right bill. People might forget which political party is actually looking after them for a couple of election seasons, but eventually Republican policies will leave half the country behind again and people will again vote in someone that wants to fix a problem and not prolong it. You are old enough to have witnessed these political ebb and flo’s before, I know you understand what i’m saying.

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        Rando: There will be more chances. I’m a firm believer in little change at once, subtle changes. That’s how progession works. If you try too much at once the people notice. It’s like cooking a frog. If you just drop it in boiling water it’ll just jump right out (if it can). However if you slowly boil the water that the frog is in, it’ll think it’s getting a nice wamr bath until it’s too late. American politics and public are similar to that. IMHO… and for the record, NO I DON’T BOIL FROGS ALIVE… only lobsters and crabs, and mussels and clams….

                        • I have no patience for subtle changes. Health care in America needs an overhaul, not subtle changes. And doing it a little at a time does nothing to help people now. Never fear, American family going into bankruptcy over medical bills, there may be relief for you 10 years down the road. Too little too late.

            • Youtoo says:

              Rando is Fastfood- EWAdams evil twin .

        • Nebton says:

          Jon Stewart had an excellent bit on last night about how “most of the country says they don’t want it”. I love it when he tackle’s Fox News’ talking points.

        • Demidan says:

          Think much?

      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

        But the ones that make fun of OBama looking like Tiger Woods or Will Smith are pretty funny. :-)

        However though this is a Sarah Palin Lol, I really didn’t find it that funny. Plus it’s like the second in two days, and it was re-used, can’t we do like a PalinDay…. or soemthign not one everyday.

    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

      Well actually the field has some brown spots, and erally the grass looks pretty tepid, and I believe I see quite a bit of crab grass… no, this lawn is in pretty bad shape. Eddie what is your take?

  2. peepers says:

    I knew she was an alien!

  3. clueless says:

    Did anyone else find this kind of corny?

  4. Igetstabby says:

    Cause the people that support her actually do work

  5. fastfood + Sarah Palin LOL = big flame war
    *gets extinguisher*

  6. Smitty says:

    Sarah Palin
    La Piranhas
    Has Anal Rip

  7. Grantski says:

    I didn’t know Vlad had access to UFO’s.

  8. {http://cheezburger.com/View.aspx?aid=3247411968}

    Once again, someone thought it was funny to rip me in their LOL making. Yeeeeeeeeah, I’m so very much NOT EWAdams, whoever anonymously made this LOL. I’m Eric-in-STL, and I’ve made hundreds of my own LOLs, including one that seriously rips into EWA. This one actually offended me. *sulks in the corner some more*

  9. keithybabes says:

    You could land a plane on her head.
    It would be a Palin-drome.

  10. This LOL reminds me. I made a GraphJam chart to sum up PK for us all:
    {http://cheezburger.com/View.aspx?aid=3242160384}

  11. I know, I could make a Big Head joke here but it would be a little out of left field and definitely flat. Also way too corny for my usual ways but I promise to… Eh, screw it, I am not feeling appropriately punny.

  12. I will need to see some cropper identification m’am.

  13. Johnnie says:

    i’d fertilize her fields…

  14. Gorgonzola says:

    … because it is obviously full of sh1t.

  15. Gryphon says:

    Epic win on the comment! Bravo *standing ovation!!!*

  16. Sock Monkey says:

    Who is this Sarah America person anyway? She looks like the bad comedian that was on The Tonight Show recently…

  17. Calico says:

    yeah, lets trash Sarah Palin, a decent human being. But lets fawn over that terrorist loving jerk Obama. You are a brain dead moron for putting this up. Not funny. YOU are full of (*), not Sarah.

  18. beany says:

    Dan Quayle is gonna be soooooooooo pissed when he sees this!

  19. meglet says:

    *sigh* i haven’t been to PK in a couple of weeks, and i come back and walk straight into a bl00dy flame war. Captionless palin is hilarious but frankly i’m bored of her and the more we make fun of her the more oxygen she has to run for 2012 or whenever your next election is. hmph.
    Meanwhile, us aussies are exporting our own well known ignoramus racist piggy pauline hanson. Migration WIN :D suck it, britain!

    • Hi meglet, i’m nice..and bored…and hounding anyone posting this late/early.

      You can’t say ‘we’, like it was me and you who voted for a second Sarah Palin Lol this week on the PK front page. Then again you can’t say what happens on PK has anything to do with a Presidential run in 2012. I doubt cheezburger.com has that much pull in American politics.

  20. Hapiface says:

    Second in fertilization count only to the field with Obama’s face on it.

    • Nonono says:

      Now that was very original!

      Oh wait … sorry my bad – what is the opposite of original again?

      Ah yes … *yawn*

      • Hapiface says:

        Matching like captions with like retorts, Nonono. ; )

        • Nonono says:

          No, just being an angry neocon with no imagination. Troll on!

          • Justacarolinian says:

            And yet Nonono is the one leaving flaming remarks on the run.

            • Well, Hapiface is being an asshat conservatroll, so I don’t see any problem with Nonono’s response.

              • Hapiface says:

                How is my post ANY worse than the original caption? PLEASE, explain this logic.

              • Justacarolinian says:

                I haven’t seen Hapiface make any nasty comments, but I will keep my eyes open. Thanks Rando.

                • Justacarolinian says:

                  Aww heck. I missed the first comment. DURH. Sorry. Sleep deprivation is setting in. My furnace (natural gas) has been acting up the last few days. I’ve woke up twice now and it wouldn’t run. Last night at 3am. I got it fixed today, but the last few days of it have me groggy. And I need to stay up long enough now to keep me from waking up early in the morning.

                  • I can sympathize with furnace issues. Trust me, you don’t want it going down when you have a low of 3 degrees. That was a terrible night. My life was saved by very good space heaters.

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      It’s been in the mid 20′s, but that’s still cold. We have 2 small fan forced electric heaters, and a big Kerosene unit, so we were ok. But while I like sleeping in the cold, waking up THAT cold at 3am is not nice. The house thermostat was bottomed out at 50.
                      It turned out to be the safety control unit. (I wasn’t here when the repair man came, so I don’t know the official name) Which was doing it’s job. There was a problem, and it shut down the furnace. But of all the dangerous mechanical work I’ve done over the years, natural gas/propane is something I’m afraid of, and don’t know why.

                      • Don’t know why? Dude, my stove & furnace are propane, and I’m terrified of it. I think it’s the very real danger of something going wrong ending up in a big fiery explosion. I’ve seen it enough on the news to make me paranoid. I don’t TOUCH the furnace except to change the filter.

  21. foo says:

    Neither side of the Palin controversy gets it. It’s not about persona, style, rhetoric, it’s about doing things. Even Palin supporters never mention the things that I’m about to mention here.

    1- Democrats forget when Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because as soon as she took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits. The Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, “la la la la” (well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that has ever done anything similar.

    2- Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new system of splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t let the door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed, and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being wealthier. Of course, the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done anything similar.Each person that lives in Alaska gets between $1200-$2000 per year for living there. What do VA. Governors give you? Answer, a closed rest stop. Now try to name anything Obama accomplished while a senator?

    3- The other thing she did when she walked into the governor’s office is she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known as “pork.” She went through the list, took 85% of them and placed them in the “when-hell-freezes-over” stack. She let locals know that if we need something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous governor’s jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook (remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning – I imagine – that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to hear the names of those other governors.

    4- Now, even with her much-ridiculed “gosh and golly” mannerism, she also managed to put together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas pipeline built which will be the biggest private construction project in the history of North America. No one else could do it although they tried. If that doesn’t impress you, then you’re trying too hard to be unimpressed while watching her do things like this while baking up a batch of brownies with her other hand.

    5- For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn’t start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No governor for 30 years could make them get started.. This summer, she told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and threatened court action.. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the way to the court house. Alaska won again.

    6- President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for Alaska to be at 50% renewable by 2025. We are already at 25%. I can give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style and persona.. Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool. But that’s just a cover-up. I’m still waiting to hear from liberals the names of other governors who can match what mine has done in two and a half years. I won’t be holding my breath.

    You have just read the truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along with the Democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her. I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty, immoral people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter ex-presidents’ wives or current President and his wife and staff.

    So “You go, Girl.” I only wish the men in Washington had your guts, determination, honesty, and morals. I rest my case.

    • teabagger slayer says:

      Cut-and-paste politics fail.

    • 1. You forget that those same corrupt charges and investigations that she apparently has taken credit for, somehow don’t apply when the charges and investigations of corruption are focused on her.

      2. I guess the only way Alaskan’s will allow Big Oil and Big Government to rape their state’s land, wilderness, and resources, is to pay them off at $1200-$2000 a pop.

      3. Being the richest state in petroleum and diamond production, and yet having the smallest populated state (There are more citizens in the city of Ausin, TX than in Alaska) it would be easy to assume that you wouldn’t need Federaly funded projects as much as less resource rich states with exponentially larger populations would.

      4. Support for the natural gas pipeline had support from both party lines and although Sarah Palin is quick to claim credit for signing the bill, many Alaskans and those involved in the decade long planning process claim she was, for the most part, the beneficiary of lucky timing. With high energy prices driving demand, there was pretty much no opposition to the proposed pipeline.

      5. I hate to side with Exxon, because they are part of the Big Oil corprate proprietors that keep pollution and dependency on oil an American mainstay, but in this particular case Palin acted more like Hugo Chavez than a United States representative. Just like Hugo Chavez did to Exxon in Venezuela, Sarah Palin denied Exxon their due process rights when the Point Thomson leases were yanked. In other words, forcing them to start drilling or lose their investment.

      6. Again i reference the population of the whole state of Alaska is less than any major city in the rest of the country, and a large part of that population is rural. I give her credit for moving her citizens toward renewable resources, but find it strange that at the same time is letting the highest bidder rape the states non-renewable resources…i find that very strange.

      This was fun. Do you have anymore?

  22. memememe says:

    Wow, Palin is the biggest fail. I mean she literally ditched her civic duty at the first hint of fame and fortune, and people want to make her president? If anyone has proved they are only in it for the money and power, it’s she.

  23. Goblin says:

    Proof that the cropcircles are man made.

  24. amenza says:

    it would be fertilized even better if it was bristol palin


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up