Show me on the bear where I can touch you.
(Bill O’Reilly)
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Basil Marceaux – The Tennessee Titan | Always Low Blows… Always! Next »
When Foreplay Goes Horribly Wrong…
» 114 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
keshet the adequate on Ballistic Marshmallows Dave on Must Be Blah History Mont… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Kate on Keeping the Internet Hone… Deacon Blues on Spock Facepalm imnotreallyhere on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… LaFeeVerte on Ballistic Marshmallows imnotreallyhere on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… BJ on Prop 8 Ruled Unconstituti… 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
VIDEO: Seattle Aquarium's New Otter Pup's Second Vet Exam
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
No gurls allowed
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
Maybe if I Stay Very Still I'll Be All Right
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Great Escape
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Nom Distraction
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Two-by-Snores
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
So Why Was It The Best I've Ever Had??
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Counteract That Yoga With Cookies
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
SUCK IT, NOT TREBEK!
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Accurate Claim is ACCURATE
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
American Idol Kyle Crews Totally Looks Like The Big Green Patrick Reena
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Big Head Harry Potter Characters
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Ring of the Day: I'm Batman
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
String Theory
Wedinator - Your special day... is hilarious.
Skyrim First Dance
Five Minute Getaway - Beautiful Travel and Vacation Photos
Gaudí-esque complex, Punta del Este, Uruguay
Set Phasers to LOL - Sci Fi and Fantasy LOLs
I Didn't Know
Animal Memes - A Meme-nagerie of Famous Internet Critters
Crazy Girlfriend Praying Mantis: It Was My Doctor. He Says I'm Dying. How Bad Do You Feel Now, Lady?
first(vote)!
now, why does this not seem strange? (WE’LL DO IT LIVE!!)
In probability theory, a stochastic process, or sometimes random process, is the counterpart to a deterministic process (or deterministic system). Instead of dealing with only one possible reality of how the process might evolve under time (as is the case, for example, for solutions of an ordinary differential equation), in a stochastic or random process there is some indeterminacy in its future evolution described by probability distributions. This means that even if the initial condition (or starting point) is known, there are many possibilities the process might go to, but some paths may be more probable and others less.
In the simplest possible case (discrete time), a stochastic process amounts to a sequence of random variables known as a time series (for example, see Markov chain). Another basic type of a stochastic process is a random field, whose domain is a region of space, in other words, a random function whose arguments are drawn from a range of continuously changing values. One approach to stochastic processes treats them as functions of one or several deterministic arguments (inputs, in most cases regarded as time) whose values (outputs) are random variables: non-deterministic (single) quantities which have certain probability distributions. Random variables corresponding to various times (or points, in the case of random fields) may be completely different. The main requirement is that these different random quantities all have the same type.[1] Although the random values of a stochastic process at different times may be independent random variables, in most commonly considered situations they exhibit complicated statistical correlations.
wrong answer. I wasn’t asking the literal, exact reason that it doesn’t seem strange. instead of that incredibly long post, my question (rhetorical as it may be) could have simply been answered with, “because he’s Bill O’riely.”
Ordinal post understanding fail
yes, I failed at understanding the word. that’s why I had to look it up, and that’s why I openly admitted that I had to look it up.
you know what? I’m confusing myself. ignore my last posts.
Don’t say the f word if you don’t want an ordinal post next time.
There is no wrong about it. Understanding Pundit Kitchen fail, and a double fail on you for daring to suggest the response was in any way wrong.
I <3 Charro.
I wanna bang Charro.
What? Should I have kept that to myself?…
Well, at least expressed the desire more eloquently.
You said the silent part loud, didn’t you?
I’ll show you on the bear where I’d touch Charro!!!!
Oooh! Show me!
Awwwww that’s sweet!
I less than three mabs.
Is there someone in charge of ordinal posts? Anyway, there were a lot more on the vote page with more than 3 votes, why’s this up here?
because it’s voted on twice, second time being after it hits the front page. (that’s why i was able to be first to vote)
Ah, they’ve changed things since I’ve been here. I can see we still respond properly to ordinal posts. Thanks, Charro
*constantly typing “define:(whatever word)” into google to figure out what’s being said*
That’s what happens to people who post “first” or any other ordinal post. I posted stats and description for a gelatinous cube for it once.
oh, ok, thanks. although I’ve gotta say, what he described easily fit the idea of an answer to my rhetorical question.
HE!? You think that rack belongs to a he!? Look…we need to send you back to biology class.
I’m doubly insulted now.
I’m as surprised as you are. But I’ll take the compliment that somebody on the PK staff really liked it…..
Excellent, BroadwayJoeFYVM!
Why is this funny?
The caption doesn’t do anything for me, but pictures of Billy and his panda will never not be funny to me ^_^
Ah, I guess it’s something that comes from watching his show, then. I agree, the caption isn’t funny at all, it’s a class-less shot at an opposing viewpoint that has no actual purpose beyond being a class-less shot at an opposing viewpoint. But I guess that’s what the internet is for, randomly spewing useless stuff without worrying how it’s taken on the other side.
The right never gives a crap how we take their jokes, so why should we care how they take our jokes? Getting insulted constantly by the right gets old, so I have absolutely no issues insulting them.
So maybe not being one sided could be a good thing? Which is what I think Hapiface was hinting at. That thing called objectivity?
I have no problem with people making legitimate jokes about a person’s actions or statements, regardless of which side that pundit/opinionist is on. But this isn’t a legitimate joke, this is a pathetic personal attack with absolutely no basis in reality or fact. It’s not funny, it’s just sad.
Careful Rando. The “one-sided” people are going to accuse you of being one-sided.
Excuse me. I don’t ALWAYS do that, just when he generalizes or the “My side does it less.” Also taking jokes, meh that’s subjective for the most part. **kicks Ivan in the knee** that’s just a warning shot, and if you didn’t mean me, then well **kicks other knee** it’s no longer one sided.
Wasn’t talking about YOU, retard. *kicks back, hobbles away* Big old meanie face. *sniffle*
Hey you were only one-sided in your kick!!!!
Stop it you two, or I’ll take the bewbs away!! I mean it.
Now THERE’S a threat that will work! *tweak*
PB! Ivan! Behave yourselves! DU and I will have to un-invite you to the Boob Festival!
Well, see, since the right likes to make lots of mean jokes about lefties, I make jokes about the righties. That makes it fair!
Yeah but left handed people are inheriantly evil.
Really? It would be the first time I’ve seen you accuse Rando of anything. Usually you make excuses for him.
I know right? Expressing your own viewpoint without giving a viewpoint you despise equal time is just EVIL, and I know nobody would be that hypocritical. And anyone who would criticize me for not being objective wouldn’t take pot shots at the left. Nooooooo. That would be despicably hypocritical. But I don’t know anyone like that.
Funny, neither do I. Good thing too, I’m sure such an individual would be a bore at parties, in fact he’d probably be run right out of the club..
But not until people left the club because they couldn’t stand the twit.
I thought this was funny and it had nothing to do with it being Bill O’Reilly. It’s a picture of a guy pointing to a bear with a reversal on the standard “Show us on the doll where the person touched you.” That’s what made it funny.
I didn’t but then all I know about B O’R is that he invented Google!
But Al Gore invented the internet! And global warming!
Pedobear’s secret identity is revealed at last!
Now, see, I think this is a major step up for Bill considering the his sexual harassment past. He’s asking for specific directions. Very good, Bill.
I think you have the wrong Bill.
Posted the very dry version of Bill-o’s harassment case.
I’m very surprised. I thought everyone knew about O’Reilly’s sexual harassment suit, but dan’s a whipper snapper, so he might have missed out on that one.
I think it was thrown out of court prior to dan’s.. ummm blossoming into womanhood?
Also, having read that article, this sounds like a case of guilty until proven innocent, but you’re a conservative, so you’re still guilty anyway. Read the article. He said it’s false, and it was never proven, so in the eyes of the law, he is innocent, and you are making baseless claims.
You ever hear of “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? Just because it was thrown out doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. If you think the justice system in this country isn’t borked, you ARE an naive infant.
So what about all the smoke of accusations against the president right now? That’s proof?
You know, when you’ve asked someone not to talk to you, you’d think they’d figure out NOT TO FVCKING TALK TO YOU.
Perhaps if we all ignore him, he’ll go away?
You ever have a really annoying younger sibling that always tries to tag along while the big kids are playing? You know the type, jumping up and down, waving their hands in the air, yelling, “OH! OH! LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!”
It’s like that.
And then you get sick of it and fight back and sure enough YOU get in trouble.
HE hit me back first!!!
That’s what most of us are trying to do. Ivan, really, just ignore it. Focus on the boobs, Ivan, focus on the boobs…
*focuses on the bewbs*
*eyes cross*
*loses focus*
*faints*
*begins giving Ivan mouth to nipple….uh….mouth* Breathe, dammit, breathe!
*noms and pretends to still be fainted*
Then don’t talk about me. Plain and simple. And for the record, I’ve never seen you ask me not to talk to you.
Can someone show me where I’m talking about him? I was talking about Bill-O and his sexual harassment thing, and suddenly he-who-shall-not-be-named tries to get all partisan. (I love that he keeps claiming he’s not conservative, and then he attacks everything liberal).
I’m really worried that he’s stalking me! It’s really, really creepy.
And why am I surprised? Charro told him to stop talking to her as well, but he kept right on until she left. At least in her case, she was a female. Well, I’m not leaving.
Uh Ivan, it wasn’t partisan. It was objective. You were the one being partisan. I simply mentioned that it applies to both sides. Would you be so willing to say that the accusations are true when it’s someone you support?
And I’ve never seen you hold back from voicing your opinion when you disagree with me. That’s not stalking, but it is funny how you complain about it in a vain attempt to dodge the point. And I will say, whenever you make the snide comments about me, named or not, I am going to make the appropriate response.
Does he realize we’re talking around him and not to him? Because we’re not going to acknowledge his existence with a reply. It’s like he’s a ghost or something. Oooooooh spooky!
I think it’s cute that he’s assuming it’s all about him. It could be about anyone, but his inherent narcissism makes everything all about him!
Cricket, did you even read Rando’s comment? Or are you being disingenuous again?
If I find a way to get it washed off, I’ll let you know.
Spooooooooky!
Ivan? Can you help me scrub off? I think I must have picked up a troll pheremone somewhere, because icky creatures keep following me around and trying to talk to me.
Yeah…uh…what I said up there. Nasty nesting gremlin struck again.
You know what’s funny? I think that sometimes when we talk other people have to pick up a dictionary. Then when they learn a new word they like they parrot it back – even when it’s incorrect. Silly plebes.
I do still hang around sometimes, but I have to say that this place sucks a lot more when there are certain people around, and I don’t like the fact that my requests for privacy have been (repeatedly) willfully ignored. It saddens me in this day and age that simple etiquette is just disregarded. Sure, I’ve made my share of mistakes, but I acknowledged so right away and continued on my path of avoidance. Some others are not as mature.
Thrown out of court?!? I thought he settled the case for a large sum of money?
Besides, he should pay me big money… I can no longer eat falafel without feeling dirty…
Hey Clinton ruined Cigars for me. Now what am I going to do with all those extra years on my life?
Well, if you just need something to smoke, I know some hippies that can hook you up… plus, I understand there’s absolutely no research that demonstrates it shortens your life at all!
Your memory, otoh…
Well, I didn’t really follow the story, so I wasn’t sure of the outcome. To me, a big monetary payout really implies guilt, don’t you think?
Didn’t Clinton pay off Jennifer Flowers? Actually BIG monetary payment usually doesn’t imply guilt, it implies “I don’t want to have a stupid lawsuit that’ll drag out for years constantly in the media”. That’s why so many STUPID mal-practice suits or suits against big companies never go to trial.
You’re not contradicting me by saying that. I agree that Clinton was a horn-dog, and I’ll say the same thing I said back then “I don’t care what he does with his penis”. That had nothing to do with his ability to govern. If she was paid off, it’s because Clinton was a naughty boy. It’s none of the public’s’ business that he cheated on Hillary. Besides, it was consensual in that case. The Bill-O case was NOT.
Jennifer Flowers was different. that was the sexual harrasment case. Jennifer was the Big Nose while Monica was the chubby intern.
Oh yeah. Well, HER I didn’t believe.
I thought Paula Jones was the one with the big nose.
Jane’s right. Gennifer was the model he had ummm “fun” with.
Paula Jones. Monica Lewinsky. Didn’t anyone tell Bill that being President he could have damn near anyone? Didn’t JFK teach us anything?
Well look at Hiliary…. no accounting for taste. Problem is JFK had to make some of them.. umm disappear.
My dad still hasn’t forgiven him for taking Marilyn away from the world.
Hey, that wasn’t Kennedy, that was Sam Giancanna! Come on, what Irishman’s going to waste a beautiful woman like that! Only a stinking Italian would… um….
Wait, are we doing inter-caucasian racism this week? I was almost sure we were!
Well, not everyone diligently follows talk show hosts’ sexual harrasment cases. It’s not like he’s the president of the United States or anything…
You win the prize. I think you’re the only one who gets my jokes. Rando’s not quite there yet. He’s had three posts to get this one, and he still hasn’t gotten it, but you hit it on your first try!
It looks like I really should work on my delivery. That was a subtle poke at Bill Clinton. Maybe next time I’ll use a wink face or something.
Why are you subtly poking at Bill Clinton? We love Clinton jokes here. Those are FUNNY! And don’t subtly poke Clinton. He’ll not so subtly poke back.
Hey Billy is that a roll of quarters in your pocket or you just happy to see me?
I chuckled.
I weep for your sense of humor.
Awww, is mocking your hero making you sad?
Hero? Hardly. I find O’Reilly to be boring. All he has is “end of the world” this and “ultimate ruin” that. Beck is always finding something that “deeply disturbs” him. Rush, on the other hand, he’s just an ass hole, and he’s not afraid to be in your face about it. He calls himself the best, acts as if he’s the best, and doesn’t give a damn what anyone else says. Take what Rush actually says with the grain of salt it deserves, and enjoy someone who’s show is actually entertaining. But hero worship O’Reilly? HARDLY.
I would stay away from doing ANYTHING for that guy.. Even weeping for his sense of humour. Just some friendly advice.
They’re all annoying, and yes, I’ll be bipartisan this time and say the liberal pundits are also annoying and I don’t listen to them either.
I bet the bear’s name is Mackris
Let me show you on the bear where my 2nd chakra is baby!! lol! Oh wait, that’s not Al Gore…
*Note to self, do NOT touch Bill O’Reilly’s bear. EVER*
I thought that was a stand alone rule?
The republirage is strong in this one…
So posting the word “first” made your week/millennium?? Lame.
That’s why people here post random replies to it. If you step back and think about it, it’s not really an achievement. LOL
yeah, and you’re totally right, but hell, why not? I didn’t waste the space like the reply, I simply added that in. it sure wasn’t necessary, but neither was the response.
The point is, this board has a long record of intolerance of ordinal posts. If you had read it for a few days you’d see that. It’s the culture of this forum. Just the way it works. if you don’t know enough not to make a first post then expect the mild reprisal. That’s all
I knew about it, and I expected (well, actually, I’ve seen quite a few types of responses) something to this effect. however, if I could do it over, I’d still first. really no point in begrudging me that. and really…. I don’t read the comments *that* often, so spamming it really just screws yourself.
if you were aware of the ordinal post rule here, you should also be aware that the reply isn’t spam (unwanted advertising for garbage) but is actually educational, and often entertaining; much more so than seeing ‘first’ on every new page