Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous You Raise Me Up | A Spanish Tradition Next »
Painting by Dan Lacey
Congressman David Wu resigned yesterday amid allegations that he had a sexual encounter with the 18-year-old daughter of a friend. Wu was the first Chinese-American person elected to congress when he took office in 1998. You will, however, inevitably remember him as that “one guy who with that sex scandal who dressed up like a tiger.” Better than being forgotten, I suppose.
Submitted by: Unknown
Via: Telegraph.co.uk
 | Wahoo on Hero’s Shawarma |
 | MrsQ Of Philly on GREECE |
 | neoritter on Progress Poker |
| !neoritter on Progress Poker |
 | vrestal on North Carolina Today |
 | Geary on GREECE |
| MrsQ Of Philly on Progress Poker |
| MrsQ Of Philly on Progress Poker |
 | Joe Biden on Hero’s Shawarma |
 | waggle238 on Time Travel Protester |
Cheezburger Company Blog
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures 
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies 
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode. 
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz 
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
It’s the Lie of the Tiger.
♫ So many times
it happens too fast
you trade your duty for passion
don’t lose your grip on that teenager’s hair
you must fight just to keep them quiet ♫
Say, Sybil, got one about Larry Craig?
Uh, say, Sybil, got one about Larry Craig?
Ooops, typo on the e-mail address.
Applying “Chap”stick while typing?
Martinis and reparative therapy will do that to you!
Did the reparative therapy cure you? See if it’s any good on multiple personality disorder.
It didn’t work on you.
You should visit Bachmann’s clinic for a complete overhaul.
Aw…. Itsy….. you too? Granted, we have had our differences, but… that?
That was just too obvious. Unless it’s Nailin trying to confuse everyone, which I wouldn’t put it past him. But you were the one that was typing and eating soup last night. Maybe you’re Nailin?
So you’re saying he’s Tronybell? Half troll, half Brony, half…Tinkerbell?
“Nailin” came back and remade his comment with the correct square for some reason, after apologizing for it already… Hmm.
Well, you might as well jump on the band wagon. Agent and Argy are making room.
Take a nap. Retreat into your shell for a few hours. You’ll emerge refreshed.
Chap! Are you Nailin!? WOW!
I know you aren’t the original Nailin, because he was mean as h3ll and had a blue square.
::rubs his temples:: ! Yes, Itsy, I am Nailin. You can tell by how many times Nailin used :: :: to emulate some kind of action vs JAC pointing it out. !
No, Itsy. I am Chap. Its been pretty obvious when I imposter, and its been pretty obvious when I sarc, and its been pretty obvious when I frell it all up.
Ok, ok. Don’t get upset I was just asking.
Right, right. Sorry, my mistake. The convo I have with JAC down below has me a bit on edge. Sorry for snapping.
No need to be on the edge.
If you want to return to site where Chap lost his sock, click here: http://news.icanhascheezburger.com/2011/07/26/political-pictures-debt-the-price-of-new-policies-bush-vs-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-549043
Not to correct you, but see how the fractally thingy didn’t change? What do you think that means?
That you’re incompetent, that you screwed up again Simpson.
As has been known to happen.
Maybe that’s the reason privately-owned utilities don’t run so well…to many Homer Chapmans.
Yup. Got me again. Running out of fridge space yet?
Stay out! It’s a refrigerator not a closet!
You changed the name and forgot to change the email address?
Boo ya!
That’s ::Chap::stick.
I saw that exchange between you and Agent Fail. I especially liked how you worked in the word “Chap” and a few colons.
Know what I like even more? How it seems you are jumping on board with Agent. EVERYONE is me. Yup. Drive bys, the occasional regular…
BTW, Carolinian. The next person to answer a call from you will answer with “Hello”. Its me. Yup. And I know you don’t need to press “2″ for Spanish. That voice asking you to do so is me. Just to get in your head. Lots of room in there…
/sarc off
JAC, at some point in time, you are going to have to stop looking at punctuation, odd posting habits, biases, etc, and look at the post for what it is. An individual comment from some one whom more than likely will never post again. You can either accept that, and take each poster for what they are, or you can see some phantasmal me behind every strawman, bit of snark, or (admittedly) poorly erected straw man and mispelling, or, post ::Chap:: every other post to justify your own paranoia. Agent, Argy, and a few others, cripes man. I already own them. I had a 20 minute following last night from typing my email wrong. Don’t be them.
*sniff sniff sniff*
Smells like FAIL…and desperation…and snark?
re: from some one whom more than likely will never post again
You are the biggest tease. Dare ya!
In the words of “Charlie Brown”:
Why everybody always pickin’ on me?
’cause he’s a clown, that Charlie Brown!
What part of Unicorns, tape measures and The Franklin Mint don’t you understand? Call Agent, for all I care. Chap said dance!
C’mon, sad clown. Don’t be so crabby.
OOooooh. Sounds like a threat. Internet tough guy.
No, I dont’ accuse you of every single sock in here. But it’s pretty obvious that you have done some socking. And yes, I figured I would draw you out with a few :: here and there. And agent fail was an obvious sock and not some drive by.
I’ve been giving you a hard time because you seem to be obsessed with me lately. And you have been socking. Admit it. Be a man.
I’ve said that Agent goes over the line and some of the people he goes after don’t deserve it. You do. I don’t feel sorry for you the least.
So are you threatening that you have personal information of mine and intend to use it dishonestly? Please do. It’s a felony.
And don’t worry, I wouldn’t waste my time calling you. Or answering a call from you. (bad grammar ::dude::)
So go roll your dice, ask mommy for some cookies and appletinis and be sure not to bite off more than you can chew. I will be nice to you and not have fun at your expense when you stop with the dishonesty. And socking to try and divert attention from the dishonesty is 10 fold wimpy. Be a man.
::deep sigh::
“And you have been socking. Admit it. Be a man.” — wow. Hey, I tried. In your head, without having to make the attempt.
“So are you threatening that you have personal information”— remember that paranoid delusion part I mentioned? I am almost curious as to how you got there, but… not really after reading your whole post.
“And socking to try and divert attention from the dishonesty is 10 fold wimpy. Be a man.” — so, not only do you need a delusion to live in, but now you need a delusion to justify attacks? Wow. A few weeks back, when you made that rousing “give the benefit of the doubt” speech, and harkened back to trying to be civil? Didn’t you notice what I was trying to do? With the exception of a few whom deserved it (“I’ve said Agent goes over the line”), I have been making a good attempt to be civil. Sure, I fall short of that mark, but I at least try to make ground when I do. Chicago Dave and I never really were the best of pals, but it occured to me I should apologize, bury the hatchet, and take what I see, and grant a benefit of the doubt. Its very interesting to see that you haven’t cleared your own bar.
Here, maybe this will sink:
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”.
Be consistant in whom you refer back to as a sock. I am sure that hobgobin will agree with you every time.
Dude, take your sedatives and wash them down with a big pitcher of martinis. We’ll all feel better.
You have in no way attempting to be civil. If you were, I would be nice to you. I prefer mending fences. I thought you and I left on ok terms. Then suddenly you come out swinging at me in posts where I wasn’t even in the thread.
All the little accusations of paranoia aren’t supporting your cause. You were busted at least once socking. I don’t really care, but when you keep coming after me with the socks I’m going to give you a hard time. The game. You just lost it.
And it does look like a plausible deniabilty but a threat. Don’t go all conspiracy theory on me when you start posting pyscho stuff.
And if you are so thin skinned that a bit of ribbing can get you this upset it tells me the bit dog hollered first.
“Then suddenly you come out swinging at me in posts where I wasn’t even in the thread.” — help me out. Where was this?
“You were busted at least once socking”— are ya sure? I mean like, for really realsy sure? Socking as in not the sky blue boomerangs, posted as something other than “Chap” for sure? Cause last night I went back to find my own mistake, to arrive at a location where DSG pointed it out (while I had the tag “Chap”) and it corrected.
And it does look like a plausible deniabilty but a threat — Please help me to see how you feel threatened.
Know why I am “thin skinned” on the matter? Cause it was a model of you I was trying to follow. No, I am not gonna be as quick as you. I don’t have the military service, etc, but I can still smile and bear a lot. Now, the model I am trying to follow is calling me a sock. WTF, man?
Nice Blame Shift: “It’s really your fault. I was only a-tryin’ to be like you!”
Blame infers I was doing something wrong Argy.
Try and keep up.
I don’t feel threatened. I’m laughing at the threat. You are thin skinned because something so trite has caused such an outrage with you. I know you aren’t all the socks and people that Agent and Argy rag you about. That is there way of keeping you honest. Maybe it works, maybe it wont.
You did learn something from DSG. How to play the innocent victim and insult people with nice appearing words.
You leave me out of the love/hate fest with Agent, Argy, Itsy and whomever and I will leave you out of my posts. f you want to have an honest conversation, try being honest with me.
Deal. So, now that we are going to be honest with eachother:
“Then suddenly you come out swinging at me in posts where I wasn’t even in the thread” — please, show me.
“You were busted at least once socking” — please, show me.
“And it does look like a plausible deniabilty but a threat ” — please, demonstrate.
You don’t get it, do you? I’m not going to argue with you.
Walk away from this subject and I bet most of the issue will go away. I know it will from me. Nothing you say will convince me that you were not socking. And you thought you were cute with the conspiracy crap. Be a man and walk away. You will never hear it from me again.
No JAC, this isn’t a “be a man” thing. You aren’t being taunted. You aren’t being bullied in some way. Some one is legitimately asking you why it is you feel threatened, why you feel like you were attacked (“came out swinging”), and how you think a poster is socking.
While I normally like to funnel things down to a yes or no, that is not the issue here. You have a blank slate, and frankly, I would LOVE to hear it. Last time you said you wouldn’t bring up andy more that thought I socked, and here we are again. You can imagine how my faith on the matter when you say that I will never hear it from you again is a bit shaky.
I don’t recall ever telling you that I wouldn’t bring up socking to you. Not until today. Yes, I told you from day 1 that I believe you are a sock of another one of the regulars. I don’t think that now because you are so whiny about it.
I’m actually shocked that you are this bothered about it. Think skinned. If you can’t take this heat, why are you even on PK? Look at the crap I’ve gotten for years on here.
When you walk away from this you will never hear from me again about you socking. With the only exception of you getting caught plain as day. (such as your avatar saying things that weren’t meant to be you)
Peachy. Socking accusations resolved.
So, since our conversation regarding giving some one the benefit of the doubt, and trying to be civil, so you have a grievance with me, where was it at, so that I might be aware of it -and not do it again-.
And in this most recent conversation where did you feel threatened (even if veiled), so that I -might not do it again-.
Nesting fail… Walk away. I don’t feel threatened. Enjoy the peace. Stir the pot and get crap on you.
… man… JAC, I tried. I really did. You brought up some issues regarding my behavior, and later decided that they weren’t worth talking with me about. I honestly don’t know what to say to that. Well, hey. Bonam fortunam to you.
*sigh* What part of I’m not going to argue with you do you not understand? Never mind, that will only start ANOTHER argument.
Instead of accepting the peace you want to argue the point. This is exactly why I don’t feel sorry for you when Agent/Argy or such engage you. It’s most likely why they choose you as well. That and the thin skin.
It’s the troll trio acting like the Three Stooges: Agent, Itsy, and Oaf.
^^^^^^^Woman hater^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JAC, this is not a threat, nor a claim to have personal information:
“BTW, Carolinian. The next person to answer a call from you will answer with “Hello”. Its me. Yup. And I know you don’t need to press “2″ for Spanish. That voice asking you to do so is me. Just to get in your head.”
It’s pointing out just how silly it is to see Chap behind every person you interact with. Granted, that’s something Agent has been doing more than you.
^ Pot calling the kettle black
Walk away. I don’t feel threatened. Enjoy the peace. Stir the pot and get crap on you.
wow, JAC.. that was a bit off the deep end.
Even for an internet bully.
“Them”? *shudder*
WHY did someone immortalize that in oils?
Count your blessings. It’s not a nude pose this time.
Arrrgh. Pass the mind bleach and mental floss.
It needs to be easier to unsubscribe from stupid online drivel.
There’s always a block rule….
why did he have to resign again?
Probably lots more stuff we don’t know about and it would have come out.
So then why the hell is that bastard Charlie Wrangel still in office, dammit!
Same reasons ted kennedy, byrd, clinton, frank and obama never got booted from office.
All are democrats, all in that inner circle, the chosen few that aren’t burdened with the same ethics standards as everyone else.
I would rather have someone who has strange sex fetishes, but doesn’t do anything actually illegal, in office than one who commits criminal acts, avoids taxes, and then has the unmitigated gall to be the chairman of the committee that makes tax laws.
Well, you’ve just eliminated most of the democrats in congress and maybe a few republicans.
Not that I would complain about it, mind you.
what has obama done?
We don’t know if he’s guilty until it comes to trial, but his former staff members say he’s pretty unbalanced. Considering he’s still in office, that’s unusual to say the least.
Unusual like Weiner, Massa or Lee?
Q. why did he have to resign again?
A. Congressman David Wu resigned yesterday amid allegations that he had a sexual encounter with the 18-year-old daughter of a friend.
The mods made it easy to answer that question.
it’s perfectly legal though
There is some weird sh$t going on with this board today.
Are you receiving heavy “moderation”?