
String theory? Issa spaghetti yes? Here, I’a facepalm for you
LoL by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Fluffy Dissent | Putin Puns Next »

String theory? Issa spaghetti yes? Here, I’a facepalm for you
LoL by: Unknown
Ok, where is outrage? Come on now, this is more racist than that Chinese lady commercial. I expect some extreme liberal outrage up in here! How dare they make Italians look like stupid spaghetti eating broken English speaking fools. I can’t wait to hear the explanations…
Sorry Itsy but the lol hinges on the Church’s denial of science…and like draugr says the Pope isn’t Italian.
Oh how in the world does that matter!? The lol, incorrect as it may be, is assuming Italians eat spaghetti and talk in broken English. That is racist, remember the Chinese lady lol? It’s what I learned. I now know what racism is and this is it. Come on folks!? RAAAAAAAAAAGE!!!
Sorry, I’m having a hard time summoning outrage about something so ridiculously stupid that was created for a lolsite.
Ok, well I tried…
And you failed.
itsybit, you do realize there’s a difference between a politician’s racist joke shown to several million people during the superbowl, and some yahoo’s crappy joke on a cheezburger site, right?
This.
Of course there is a difference in the amount of people that see them. But either both are racist or both are not. I don’t think either one is just having fun with it.
I don’t know about racist. Both Italians and Germans are caucasians. It is certainly an ethnic slur on Italian accents and intelligence, but in the end it only displays the bigotry and ignorance of its perpetrator. I guess that’s why I’m not angry. This person designed and executed his own punishment. Kinda sad, actually.
You are right, both lols display and attempt to propagate a bias against a group of people based only on their difference from the target audience. The major difference being this lol implied Italians were inferior, while the other portrayed the Chinese as an actual threat.
Actually, the other portrayed big spending politicians as the threat. It only portrayed the Chinese as doing what anyone would do naturally and that is taking advantage of an adversary. Not sure what is so wrong with that…
The actual threat was our jobs going to China because of our debt burden, made larger by free-spending pols. It would not be wrong of the Chinese to take advantage, but it was still a threat made all the sharper because it was made by a stereotypical ethnic Chinese.
Well what I saw was the reason for the threat being laid out by a Chinese woman speaking broken English, as many Chinese English speakers probably do. Then the woman being called Debbie Spenditnow? That says it all, she was obviously the threat according to the commercial, not the pretty Chinese lady on a bike. I’m sure people don’t really think the Chinese people are coming over here and literally stealing our jobs somehow…
She was pretty much saying, “LOL WE STEALIN UR JERBS KTHXBAI”
No, they think our companies are leaving here and taking jobs that were ours with them. They would be leaving us and going to China due to taxes. Debbie was only a threat due to her spending, which would cause taxes to rise, contributing to the exodus of opportunity to Fu Manchu’s yellow horde of Blue Bees.
The pretty lady was not the threat, per se. Her country was.
No it is the big spender politicians that are the threat. Not the companies and not the Chinese.
itsybit: The reason big spending pols are a threat is that taxes need to go up to support that habit. One of the direct consequences of raising taxes is that businesses will leave for greener pastures. It’s not a question of patriotism but of pragmatism: they’ll go where they can make the most money. The point the commercial was making was that China lent us a lot of money and a lot of the companies would go there. So, kind of a double whammy: taxes go up and possibly lose your job. At least that’s my sense of it.
Exactly, sounds like we agree. If our politicians can stop that insane spending we can maybe reverse some of the damage. The Chinese are not our enemy, we are our own worst enemy. That to me was the message of the Chinese lady commercial.
You do realize the Church doesn’t deny science right?
This is retarded and the stereotype is rather worn-out, but unlike the commercial, which was created by someone taking themselves seriously, this is just a stupid joke.
I agree. The lol is tasteless, mistaken in premise, and not funny. Chico Marx is funny; this is not.
The pope is not Italian.
The Pope is German. Sieg Heil!
Oh grow up!
he was in the Nazi youth, you know. the Heil works just fine
It was Hitler Youth actually. So were most German kids. To not be was considered suspicious. (As was membership of the Nazi Party. No one actually forced you to join it, but if you didn’t join it enough barriers went up to prevent you from living your life normally)
I hope he made LOTSA SPAGHETTI!
The pope is polish, no?
That was the last pope.
The greater and more productive of the two is in the wheelchair.
Atheism is the ultimate ego trip. They believe they ARE God.
In some cases, yes, but it is a vocal minority. Atheists are no more universally awful than Republicans.
Atheism = No God
According to you, they believe they are god.
Therefor, they believe they don’t exist.
Wait, that’s entirely wrong, so you must simply be an idiot.
dont try to use logic, it will only give you a headache
Kinda what he was getting at was that atheists replace the idea of God with the idea of self, thus replacing a deocentric universe with an egocentric one.
I think it more replaces it with the idea of man, which is better for appreciating the things you can actually touch, and whose thanks are really needed.
First, since you would be the best known example of Man to yourself and therefore closest to your ideal human, there you are back in your egocentric universe.
Be careful with denying the reality of things that are intangible. There are no empirical proofs of emotions,thoughts, hopes, or dreams, but I trust you will not deny their reality.
I have never needed the thanks of anyone, though I have appreciated gratitude when it was given me, and always tried to render it to my benefactors.
I certainly don’t find myself ideal, I find the guy I have a crush on ideal. ;3
We lack belief in god. It’s that simple. You show us proof and most of us will spin on a dime. Until then, have fun believing in your as of yet unproven, magical, sky-daddy of an imaginary friend for delusional, ignorant adults.
Prove there is no God and I’ll believe your way. Until then, I’ll continue to believe. If I’m wrong I’ll be no worse off. If you’re wrong I’d say you screwed the pooch.
The Absence Of Evidence Is The Evidence Of Absence
One piece of evidence is not proof; else I could point at any living thing and say that it is obviously too complex to have happened by chance- indicating a Creator.
And that would be countered that such complex systems were built up over trillions of years.
Check it out: the Earth is only 4,000,000,000 years old, not even 1/2 a trillion.
Even were I to grant you the trillions of years, who set up the laws of probability and weren’t they a great idea? In fact, who set up any of the scientific laws?
Proving a negative really is much more difficult than showing a positive.
I really have no problem with atheists provided they refrain from ridiculing my faith as BJ did.
I never said they were notable until Earth came to its current state.
Besides, compare neanderthals with yourself, and then tell me how old they are. ;3
Dude, I didn’t like what BJ said about religious people, but I would never call him a neanderthal. I have no idea how old he is.
I never mentioned BJ, nor do I know a noun that follows that acronym.
BJ is the person I first replied to who said “…have fun believing in your as of yet unproven, magical sky-daddy of an imaginary friend for delusional, ignorant adults.”
Since he lacks proof of his conclusion, calling someone delusional and ignorant because they believe the opposite way with equal lack of proof says more about his state of mind than mine. Enter Geary, who took up his end of the debate.
Well, I find it annoying when I make a comment and the OP doesn’t respond, so I take the liberty of responding to any conversation in which I have an opinion to chip in, though MacFeegle’s giant comments tend to throw me for a loop.
Not angry, just explaining where BJ comes from. Pretty sure the reason this is all in the open is so anyone who wants to respond can. You at least are interesting.
Being annoyed doesn’t mean you’re angry. ;3
And thanks!
If it was that simple you wouldn’t added your word diarrhoea at the end of your comment.
Atheism on paper yes, atheism in the real world though includes some varying level of malicious denunciation of anyone who believes otherwise. Typically describing such dissenters as stupid or psychologically weak.
I hate to say it, but it is comments like that one that make me think that South Park may have given us a pretty accurate depiction of a future in which all religion is wiped out, but there is still war because they can’t agree on which version of atheism is the correct one. As long as people can rationalize the devaluation of large groups of people for their perceived differences there will always be war. That’s just as true of atheists as it is anyone else.
Granted, considering most atheists I’ve found are agnostics who don’t know what the word ‘agnostic’ is, I doubt spirituality, I don’t think two atheists will knowingly stumble upon each other by chance and get around to explaining their version of atheism. ;3
If they were agnostic they wouldn’t be confrontational about their atheism. Since if they were agnostic; they would be readily admitting that theism could be true and that atheism may not. Further they’d be also making the first step into admitting that atheism is a belief. BJ is an atheist, the assumption that atheism has been proven while theism has not makes him one. I would say he’s a soft atheist since he’s willing to compromise IF proof is ever provided.
I just realized I strayed off a bit. Most atheists I’ve met tend to be confrontational about their belief. And they’re not shy about making jokes that would denounce religion or theists. That to me would make them purely atheist.
Rome is in Italy. Pope must be Italian. And aren’t Catholics soooooo ignorant, by the way?
I’m having a hard time to decide who’s more ignorant, catholics or americans. I think I’ll settle for hoping to never ever meet a catholic american!
If you want to see real ignorance, try an American Fundamentalist.
John F. Kennedy was a catholic American. And the most ignorant are the Germans.
You might want to rephrase that, since the Germans kinda beat Americans in most every aspect in the modern world.
you are right there! (except for military, economy, and technology)
Their military is more efficient, their economy is much more stable, and their technology output is much more reliable, at least regarding automobiles.
Militaries will be more efficient if smaller (ours still blows theirs out of the water with technology, equipment, and power), our economy has a greater GDP per capita and lower debt per capita, and we are miles ahead in any other technology field
If I recall, Germany actually has higher GDP per capita and lower debt per capita, or that might be a higher GDP:Debt ratio.
Debt/Capita
USA: 47,568
GER: 57,755
% debt to GDP
USA: 99
GER: 142
GDP/Capita
USA: 48,147
GER: 44,558
They’re military is of course more efficient when we’re subsidizing their defense. We’ve had military bases in Germany how long now?
And for the rest see waggle’s post.
*their
Lol. I thought Americans were supposed to be arrogant and xenophobic? I guess they don’t have mirrors where you come from…
Catholics ignorant?
Umm, maybe few hundred years ago? Catholic church supports scientific method, don’t deny evolution, don’t have a problem with stem cell research if cells are not taken from deliberatly aborted fetuses, and have a law against directly participating in civil government.
Compared to some they are freaking fountain of knoweldge and understanding.
I do believe that was sarcasm on Uckfay’s part.
Still there are stupid people out there that will take uckfay’s post as the Gospel.
I have trouble imagining that Hawking would be ok with the pope touching him.
What’s more insulting is that the Pope apparently is blessing a known atheist
Not really. The meaning behind the gesture is good, regardless of whether the recipient of the gesture is of the same religion as the one making the gesture.
All HEIL the pope!
pope is german, the body language says it all.
the pope takes joy at another mind of god