Julianne Moore as Sarah Palin in the upcoming HBO film, “Game Change.”
Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Even Worse Than Herp Derp | It’s Good to be King? Next »
Ready for Her Closeup
» 71 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
Deelz on Crowd Pleaser Andrew Long on Vandals Cashing In Daniel Bell on Vandals Cashing In noname on I’m So Live imnotreallyhere on Time Travel Protester imnotreallyhere on GREECE imnotreallyhere on GREECE eddi on Does to Jets What it Does to… Lyerra on Haven’t They Heard of Ce… Clueless the amazing… on My Bad 
Cheezburger Company BlogPrint on Demand
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Animal Memes: OCD Otter - Takes a Long Lunch
Lolcats - Lolcats n' Funny Cat Pictures
Yikes.
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
Duuuuuude
Animal Capshunz - All of the Internet's Animals. Captioned
This Is the Cleanest My Car Has Ever Been
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Go To Your Room!
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Darth Maul And His Cat
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Stripey Hoggies
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
Roman Emo
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Turn on the Jets!
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
Owlways and 7eva
ROFLrazzi - Lol Celebs and All That's Fab Funny in Showbiz
Good Guy George
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
Timothy Olyphant Totally Looks Like Cristian de la Fuente
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Darth Vader Kokeshi
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Ring of the Day: Diamonds on my Grill
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
UFO Bathtub
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
About 3 yrs after the election and she still makes liberals mortified.
They claim she was nothing, barely a foot note in history, not worth reporting on. Yet, we have many SNL skits about her and now, what appears to be, a HBO feature?
Say it ain’t so!
Sarah Palin as president, still galactically better than who is there now.
Mortified? No. Horribly amused with a hint of sadness about the fate of man kind? Yes.
There were also lots of SNL skits about Britney Spears. The difference is that Britney actual contributed something to society.
If by ‘galactically’ you mean ‘you would have to be an extraterrestrial, with no comprehension of human ethics and morals or any knowledge of Earth Politics politics,’ then I agree.
^ THIS
It’s rather annoying the proposition that liberals are ‘scared’ of Palin. I’m frankly as scared of Palin as I am scared of a brain dead amputee, in that their mere existence is somewhat unnerving and uncanny, but they don’t pose a threat in the slightest.
So why the continuing attention to her? Why are they following her bus all over DC and then whining when she doesn’t hand out her itinerary?
If she’s as you describe, then no one should pay her any mind at all.
Because she makes excellent comedy material and us liberals enjoy funny stuff.
Really?
I haven’t seen anything from liberal politician remotely funny.
Weinergate was hilarious.
Some people just can’t stop thinking about wiener.
“I haven’t seen anything from liberal politician remotely funny.”
The grammar in that is kind of funny.
Sarah is so 2008. I’ve hardly heard anything about her, or her hellish brood, lately. I’m guessing that at this point the only person who fears her is Todd.
I heard her CPAC speech was killer. I haven’t heard it yet.
Neither has almost anyone else. Sarah is yesterday’s news.
That’s because it’s a literal Brown Note, so they didn’t put it up anywhere.
You’re one to talk.
Itsy’s one to look.
You clearly aren’t looking then.
Oh look! He’s wearing his pants! Or is he….
Funny how one occurrence is atrocious, but two makes it a-okay to you.
How many photos were there of his junk again?
How many cancer-ridden wives did Newt divorce?
See that’s not funny, photos of your junk on the internet is. Bwahahaha!
However, the number’s the same. ;3
Somebody is still obsessed with wiener.
newt persecuted clinton for having an affair, while having one himself.
edwards did a slightly lesser version of the same thing without the hypocrisy, and only once, but involving the cancer-ridden wife that he went back to, and his name is mud.
weiner did’t even have a real affair.
newt did it twice, did it in a horrible way, and also was censured for misuse of his power. hm… gop double standard much?
Everyone tries to trump up the misdeeds of the enemy while downplaying those of their own people… It’s not strictly a single political party that does this. Welcome to Earth..
I’m just pointing out hypocrisy.
Well, then, all you have to do is point in the general direction of DC…
That goes without saying. ;3
Or because they’re hoping it’s really Tina Fey
Because she’s a celebrity, being media whores and c*ckblocking people who actually have a reason to be there is what they do.
Nobody’s scared of Sarah Palin. We’re just aware of what a mess she’d make if she ever got elected. There’s a difference.
palin’s a media whore, who drums up attention herself. giving her that attention does not mean anyone’s scared of her.
c’mon, she’s a joke. that the gop doesn’t realize that because she’s one of theirs (and therefore needs to be defended automatically) is idiotic.
One can say that picking on Tebow is tiresome without actually defending Tebow.
I find it fun to pick on show-boaters, myself. ;3
Please tell me she didn’t have full creative control over this…
And if she did, then I’d like to introduce: SPINAL TAP!!!
In the new version, the ignorance would be turned up to 11.
I have a feeling if Woody Harrelson is in this, that it is not her authorized version of events nor did she have any say in the creative process.
The first Palin biopic, “Nailin Pailin,” was better.
Lisa Ann, how would I live without you…
I just looked into it. This is HBO/ Director Jay Roach’s second political film together. The first was “Recount” and guess what year it was released? 2008. Something else was going on in 2008…what was it? Now, for 2012…something else is happening this year too…we get another biased “fact-based” movie that is aimed at something. But what could it be?
Typical Hollywood propaganda crap.
To be fair, most Typical Hollywood Crap is in the form of action movies and romantic comedies.
Yes, but this is a special form of Hollywood Crap, known as propaganda in which they specialize close to election time.
It’s also not very cost effective, since relatively few people actually go to see it and it only really earns revenue when it goes to Pay-Per View and political science majors are bored on a Saturday Night.
Well that’s because of the quality which is why it is referred to as crap.
I don’t recall anybody I know having every gone to a movie about current/recent politics.
Do we get to see Sarah’s boobs?
Meh.
People choose to see movies. Don’t like it? Don’t pay to see it.
Propaganda is when China has required attendance at patriotic rallies.
You see the difference, right?
DOH! Sorry. I left my Pollyanna on.
That’s a very narrow definition you are working with there. Would it have been propaganda if Sarah Palin had written the script?
If I recall, the general definition of propaganda was some form of art meant to make a political point, such as film, paintings, sculpture, etc etc.
It’s not always art, maybe media would be more accurate. Using this definition:
Any kind of data including graphics, images, audio and video, though typically excluding raw text or executable code.
There can be a lot of propaganda in art, but it can also be found in public service announcements, advertising, news, speeches, etc.
It also goes a little further than just making a political point. It is differentiated from disseminating information in that it either adds to or takes away from the facts in an effort to persuade.
You could say that brushing your teeth 3 times a day is good for you. On the surface, it seems like disseminating information. But, what if research showed that brushing 3 times a day actually broke down the enamel causing more cavities and tooth decay. Then you found out that the ADA was the group behind the public service announcements to brush 3 times a day in an attempt to bring in more business. Then it becomes propaganda.
I blame television.
I blame the ADA.
I blame society, because, technically, it’s responsible for everything that happens to itself.
if palin had written the script, it’d be filled with such nonsensical ramblings as to make me look good.
plus, no director worth his salt would give serious credence to a script written in crayon.
Propaganda doesn’t require a captive audience.
Too true. One of our most iconic pieces of propaganda during WWII was the war reports that they showed before a movie in the theaters.
Spring-Break College Kids?
Three days later, and Brent Bozell is parroting me.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2012/02/24/bozell-hbos-palin-pollution/?subscriber=1
Personally I think that Tina Fey impersonator would’ve done better.
It’s gonna be the best comedy on television!
Three vocally and fiercely anti-Republican actors playing the parts of Republicans in a movie about an election. I’m sure this film will absolutely nail it. I was going to try to draw an analogy, but I couldn’t think of a vocally and fiercely anti-Democrat actor that is still alive.
It’s called the GOP. ;3
But there are no actors in the Republican party.
Oh wait! You were trying to subtlely suggest that Republicans are insincere by comparing them to professional performers and contrasting them against the unquestionable altruism and authenticity of their ideological opposite. FUNNY! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!
Well, they are politicians, and you asked for, specifically, anti-Democrat actors.
No actors that aren’t Rethuglicans? Maybe you missed “bedtime for bongo” or “terminator” or “walker texas ranger” Oh you mean those rethuglicans are as bad a politician as they were bad actors!
All credibility is lost when you use words like “Rethuglicans” or “Democraps” or any of the other colorful idiocies people tend to use…
Ronald Reagan wasn’t an actor. If you don’t believe me, look it up on Conservapedia.
http://www.mypalal.com/aboutalan/ConservativeCelebrities.cfm
Not quite.